Re: [rspec-users] align the runner

2007-10-03 Thread Shane Duan
Sorry, I just looked at the documentation and I meant runner extensions.


 Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:14:45 -0500
 From: David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [rspec-users] align the runner
 To: rspec-users rspec-users@rubyforge.org
 Message-ID:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

 On 10/2/07, Shane Duan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Yes.  Thanks.
 
  That probably means that the customer runner will work with both, if
  not already.

 Customer Runner? I assume you mean what we've been calling Story
 Runner, yes? We're calling that Scenario Runner from now on (because
 it makes more sense to run scenarios and examples than stories and
 specs).

 
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users


Re: [rspec-users] align the runner

2007-10-02 Thread David Chelimsky
On 10/2/07, Shane Duan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I saw from the thread color output that there is a plan to align
 the runner.  Is there a place to see what that means?  I am just
 curious.

I think that there are conversations about this on the rspec-devel
list. Thus far we haven't created any sort of public roadmap/gameplan,
etc. It'd be nice, but certainly not our first priority.

In brief, we want the output from running Scenarios and Examples to
look the same. So we'll want the underlying code to be unified. Make
sense?


 Thanks
 Shane
 ___
 rspec-users mailing list
 rspec-users@rubyforge.org
 http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users


Re: [rspec-users] align the runner

2007-10-02 Thread Shane Duan
Yes.  Thanks.

That probably means that the customer runner will work with both, if
not already.


 Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:06:43 -0500
 From: David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [rspec-users] align the runner
 To: rspec-users rspec-users@rubyforge.org
 Message-ID:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

 On 10/2/07, Shane Duan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I saw from the thread color output that there is a plan to align
  the runner.  Is there a place to see what that means?  I am just
  curious.

 I think that there are conversations about this on the rspec-devel
 list. Thus far we haven't created any sort of public roadmap/gameplan,
 etc. It'd be nice, but certainly not our first priority.

 In brief, we want the output from running Scenarios and Examples to
 look the same. So we'll want the underlying code to be unified. Make
 sense?

 
  Thanks
  Shane
  ___
  rspec-users mailing list
  rspec-users@rubyforge.org
  http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
 
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users


Re: [rspec-users] align the runner

2007-10-02 Thread David Chelimsky
On 10/2/07, Shane Duan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yes.  Thanks.

 That probably means that the customer runner will work with both, if
 not already.

Customer Runner? I assume you mean what we've been calling Story
Runner, yes? We're calling that Scenario Runner from now on (because
it makes more sense to run scenarios and examples than stories and
specs).



  Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:06:43 -0500
  From: David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [rspec-users] align the runner
  To: rspec-users rspec-users@rubyforge.org
  Message-ID:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 
  On 10/2/07, Shane Duan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I saw from the thread color output that there is a plan to align
   the runner.  Is there a place to see what that means?  I am just
   curious.
 
  I think that there are conversations about this on the rspec-devel
  list. Thus far we haven't created any sort of public roadmap/gameplan,
  etc. It'd be nice, but certainly not our first priority.
 
  In brief, we want the output from running Scenarios and Examples to
  look the same. So we'll want the underlying code to be unified. Make
  sense?
 
  
   Thanks
   Shane
   ___
   rspec-users mailing list
   rspec-users@rubyforge.org
   http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
  
 ___
 rspec-users mailing list
 rspec-users@rubyforge.org
 http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users