Rejected posting to ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM

2005-08-09 Thread L-Soft list server at DevelopMentor (1.8e)
You  are not  authorized to  send mail  to the  ADVANCED-DOTNET list  from your
rsync@LISTS.SAMBA.ORG account. You might be authorized to send to the list from
another of  your accounts,  or perhaps  when using  another mail  program which
generates slightly  different addresses, but  LISTSERV has no way  to associate
this other account or address with yours. If you need assistance or if you have
any question regarding  the policy of the ADVANCED-DOTNET  list, please contact
the list owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---BeginMessage---
The original message was received at Tue, 9 Aug 2005 09:51:05 +0100 from 
lists.samba.org [40.92.149.239]

- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
advanced-dotnet@discuss.develop.com




===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentorĀ®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com

---End Message---
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Automated reply from [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2005-08-09 Thread jroyler
On holiday
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


meta data stored in separate file?

2005-08-09 Thread Joe Pruett
i found a couple messages in the archives relating to backups vs. 
distribution and ownership issues without root privs that kinda touched on 
the idea of storing meta info (ownership, modes, acls) in a separate file.  
has anyone else looked at storing meta data in a side file of some sort?  
it seems that it could be done all on the client side.  send over files 
with totally plain meta info and then send another file with text 
containing the actual meta data.

the reason i'm looking at this is to use rsync as a backup system for 
foreign systems.  ones that don't share uid space (or even os 
similarity) to the central server.  basically use ssh with a non-root 
keypair so that data can be read/written to each servers backup space.  by 
using separate meta files, we can handle windows or other systems that 
might have acls or permissions flags that don't match with unix.

i realize that this is normally what tar/cpio/dump/etc would be used for, 
but rsync has the nice ability to use hardlinks to create pseudo snapshot 
backups that make it easy to retrieve things, plus the inherent speedup 
from the rsync algorithm.

any input from the list about this idea?

-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Re: meta data stored in separate file?

2005-08-09 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 12:52:43PM -0700, Joe Pruett wrote:
 has anyone else looked at storing meta data in a side file of some sort?  

I recommend using a program such as fakeroot (when used with the -s
option to save the meta data) or pretendroot (which I haven't personally
used).  For instance, either run something like this for a daemon setup:

  fakeroot -s /path/fakeroot.data rsync --daemon --port=8873 \
--config=/path/rsyncd.conf

(Make sure that the real user that is running the daemon can write to
the lock file, the pid file, all the module paths, and any log file;
also, disable chroot and be sure to use an unprivileged port.)

Alternately, do something like this for a remote-shell-based copy:

  rsync -av --rsync-path=fakeroot -s /path/fakeroot.data \
/src/ host:/dest/

Either option will allow the remote rsync to save all the owner, group,
device, etc. info that the sending rsync provides.

..wayne..
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Re: meta data stored in separate file?

2005-08-09 Thread Joe Pruett
 I recommend using a program such as fakeroot (when used with the -s
 option to save the meta data) or pretendroot (which I haven't personally
 used).  For instance, either run something like this for a daemon setup:
 
   fakeroot -s /path/fakeroot.data rsync --daemon --port=8873 \
 --config=/path/rsyncd.conf

but this doesn't work for windows acls, and maybe not for unix acls.  it
also wouldn't apply to apple fork data, which was another thread i found
but forgot to mention in my message.

i realize this is turning rsync into more of a backup system than it is 
now, which is why i was thinking maybe it could be done with client side 
code.

-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Re: meta data stored in separate file?

2005-08-09 Thread Dan Pritts
There's something called backuppc (i think backuppc.sourceforge.net)
which uses some sort of db backend and has multiple possible transports,
rsync is one option.  I think it might do what you're looking for.

It also has other interesting features, like storing only a single local
copy (on the backup server) of a given remote file.  So you don't, for
instance, have an entire windows XP image on disk for each
client, but rather many database entries for files with these names 
md5sums.

I haven't really used it (yet).

I don't think it directly supports mac resource forks, perhaps could be
made to do so with an appropriate rsync variant.


On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 01:58:47PM -0700, Joe Pruett wrote:
  I recommend using a program such as fakeroot (when used with the -s
  option to save the meta data) or pretendroot (which I haven't personally
  used).  For instance, either run something like this for a daemon setup:
  
fakeroot -s /path/fakeroot.data rsync --daemon --port=8873 \
  --config=/path/rsyncd.conf
 
 but this doesn't work for windows acls, and maybe not for unix acls.  it
 also wouldn't apply to apple fork data, which was another thread i found
 but forgot to mention in my message.
 
 i realize this is turning rsync into more of a backup system than it is 
 now, which is why i was thinking maybe it could be done with client side 
 code.
 
 -- 
 To unsubscribe or change options: 
 https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
 Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


danno
--
dan pritts - systems administrator - internet2
734/352-4953 office734/834-7224 mobile
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Re: meta data stored in separate file?

2005-08-09 Thread Joe Pruett
 There's something called backuppc (i think backuppc.sourceforge.net)
 which uses some sort of db backend and has multiple possible transports,
 rsync is one option.  I think it might do what you're looking for.

interesting tool, but it is not what i need.  it doesn't do acls.  it is a
pull system, rather than push.  this is for an isp setting (which i didn't
mention yet) where colocation customers would push their backups to a
central box.

any other tools out there?

-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html