I had intended to come back to this but because I didn't really think I
had anything to add to the discussion I put it at a low enough priority
that I forgot about it. But I saw your bug report and was surprised to
see that I was already unhelpful on this topic but because that original
poster didn't have access to do an rm while you are trying to get a
performance boost.
I have heard in the past that rsyncing an empty dir over a tree to
delete the tree is faster than an rm -rf but I can't say I have ever
benchmarked it to get any actual numbers. But now that I am hearing
that rsync actually adds a bunch of pointless chmods to the process. Is
it still faster given this problem? If so maybe we should be trying to
investigate why rm is so slow. Otherwise, I would agree that an
optimization to not do a bunch of pointless chmods is a good idea. I
would suspect that they are only there to prevent permission denied
errors perhaps on some obscure filesystem (I tested on vfat since it is
so non-compatible but read only files unlink fine there).
On 9/18/23 19:42, rsync--- via rsync wrote:
Context
---
I am one of the active developers of the open source application "Back in Time"
which uses "rsync" as backend and I want to fix an open issue:
"Back in Time"-Bug:
https://github.com/bit-team/backintime/issues/994#issuecomment-1724211507
"Back in Time" uses "--link-dest" to reduce traffic and storage by hardlinking
unchanged files in the backups/snapshots and tries to keep the permissions
by using "--perms --group --owner" by default.
Older snapshots are then deleted according to a schedule.
Issue
-
When deleting a complete snapshot folder with rsync using an empty source folder
(which is a best practice for faster deletion than "rm -f") the permissions of
hardlinked
files are changed from eg. 444/-r--r--r-- to 644/-rw-r--r-- for all deleted
files
with existing hardlinks:
mkdir empty
rsync -a --delete -s empty/ snapshot1/
This distorts the backup history.
There is a corrsponding 6-year-old issue in Bugzilla incl. a patch but the
issue is still unfixed:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806
Questions
-
1. Is there a reliable workaround ("--super" is proposed in the issue but may
probably not always work)?
2. If a rsync developer is reading this: Is there any chance to fix this?
Steps to reproduce
--
I have attached a bash script "setup.sh" as txt file which makes the issue
fully reproducible (on Ubuntu 22.04).
--
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,
Kevin Korb Phone:(407) 252-6853
Systems Administrator Internet:
FutureQuest, Inc. ke...@futurequest.net (work)
Orlando, Floridak...@sanitarium.net (personal)
Web page: https://sanitarium.net/
PGP public key available on web site.
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
