[Bug 15254] rsync performs full replication with option -I since last upgrade to version 3.2.3 protocol version 31
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15254 Frank B changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WORKSFORME |FIXED --- Comment #10 from Frank B --- Ok, so you're saying the behavior before the upgrade was a bug (not transferring old files) and this has now been fixed in the new binary so that it's transferring the files again. This is what I was looking for - question answered. The documentation still doesn't cover that combination, but never mind. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
[Bug 15254] rsync performs full replication with option -I since last upgrade to version 3.2.3 protocol version 31
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15254 --- Comment #9 from Wayne Davison --- The combo of -I with -u briefly changed to be broken but it was fixed. The -u option means that older files on the sender are ignored. -I means that files with the same date are TRANSFERRED. When that was not occuring, it was a bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
[Bug 15254] rsync performs full replication with option -I since last upgrade to version 3.2.3 protocol version 31
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15254 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
[Bug 15254] rsync performs full replication with option -I since last upgrade to version 3.2.3 protocol version 31
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15254 --- Comment #8 from Frank B --- Quick addition: You can say it's a "corner case", a result of wrong assumptions regarding u/I or a weird usecase but you can't say "nothing has changed" since that clearly isn't true. The question is: is uI supported (the documentation does not state this) and which behavior is correct, the old one before the update or the new one - or which behavior would you expect? I have a working solution now but that's definitely a point to be clarified and at least to be updated in the documentation. There could be other users too using this combination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
[Bug 15254] rsync performs full replication with option -I since last upgrade to version 3.2.3 protocol version 31
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15254 Frank B changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
[Bug 15254] rsync performs full replication with option -I since last upgrade to version 3.2.3 protocol version 31
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15254 --- Comment #7 from Frank B --- Yes, it has. The crontab was unchanged for months and directly after the update of rsync via apt, it started performing full replications. It's clearly a result of the new binary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
[Bug 15254] rsync performs full replication with option -I since last upgrade to version 3.2.3 protocol version 31
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15254 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Korb --- I can confirm that something did change... # mkdir /tmp/src /tmp/dest # touch /tmp/src/a /tmp/src/b /tmp/src/c # rsync -vai /tmp/src/ /tmp/dest/ sending incremental file list .d..t.. ./ >f+ a >f+ b >f+ c sent 211 bytes received 76 bytes 574.00 bytes/sec total size is 0 speedup is 0.00 # touch /tmp/dest/b # /usr/src/rsync-3.2.0/rsync -vai -nIu /tmp/src/ /tmp/dest/ sending incremental file list sent 77 bytes received 12 bytes 178.00 bytes/sec total size is 0 speedup is 0.00 (DRY RUN) # /usr/src/rsync-3.2.7/rsync -vai -nIu /tmp/src/ /tmp/dest/ sending incremental file list >f. a >f. c sent 97 bytes received 22 bytes 238.00 bytes/sec total size is 0 speedup is 0.00 (DRY RUN) Guess that is up to Wayne if this is a fix or a regression. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
[Bug 15254] rsync performs full replication with option -I since last upgrade to version 3.2.3 protocol version 31
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15254 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Korb --- I had the same knee jerk reaction as Wayne to this question. -I means re-copy everything (or at least re-diff everything unless --whole-file). But I never attempted to mix it with -u so I held my tongue. Is it possible that in the past -I + -u meant re-copy everything but don't overwrite anything newer and now that exception is no longer honored? If that is the case I am not even sure whether this would be a regression or not. I have always considered -I to mean re-copy everything as an alternative to the even worse option of --checksum. But I can see a possible use case for it interacting with -u to redefine "everything". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
[Bug 15254] rsync performs full replication with option -I since last upgrade to version 3.2.3 protocol version 31
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15254 --- Comment #4 from Wayne Davison --- No it didn't. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
[Bug 15254] rsync performs full replication with option -I since last upgrade to version 3.2.3 protocol version 31
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15254 --- Comment #3 from Frank B --- The behavior still changed as this was working for months and clearly changed directly after upgrading to the new binary but it's okay for me. Looks like the I should have been l in my case due to a copy and paste issue and different font appearances. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
[Bug 15254] rsync performs full replication with option -I since last upgrade to version 3.2.3 protocol version 31
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15254 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #2 from Wayne Davison --- You need to re-read the manpage for -I. You seem to have reversed its meaning. https://download.samba.org/pub/rsync/rsync.1#opt--ignore-times -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
[Bug 15254] rsync performs full replication with option -I since last upgrade to version 3.2.3 protocol version 31
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15254 --- Comment #1 from Frank B --- rsync --version rsync version 3.2.3 protocol version 31 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
