Vs: Re: The source and destination cannot both be remote :-(
Christian Huldt wrote: That I have no idea about, but I believe it would double the bandwith requirements or half the speed compared to ssh r...@client rsync /var/tmp/in tom...@fileserver:/opt/ It would likely increase the latency, but it should not significantly impact the required bandwidth, assuming that you have a full-duplex connection. If you have a half-duplex connection, yes, the bandwidth consumption would double. Yes , with single network adapter. We using segmented network layout aka own network-interface for production, management and backup so bandwidth is not a problem for copying. Cause server are also configured own VLANs and firewalls between segments blocking traffic and eating performance so remote-remote rsync sounds good and gives more ways to copying data easily to server to server example in hardware refreshing cases. Regards Kari -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: The source and destination cannot both be remote :-(
7 maj 2010 kl. 17.43 skrev Michael Renner: Moin, this is something for the wish list: a 'rsync in the middle' mode. It would make sense: rsync is running at a server. Copyying files from one maschine to a file server. rsync r...@client:/var/tmp/in tom...@fileserver:/opt/ Would this be possible without breaking the hard link mechanism? That I have no idea about, but I believe it would double the bandwith requirements or half the speed compared to ssh r...@client rsync /var/tmp/in tom...@fileserver:/opt/ It would however be quite useful in some situations... -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: The source and destination cannot both be remote :-(
Christian Huldt wrote: That I have no idea about, but I believe it would double the bandwith requirements or half the speed compared to ssh r...@client rsync /var/tmp/in tom...@fileserver:/opt/ It would likely increase the latency, but it should not significantly impact the required bandwidth, assuming that you have a full-duplex connection. If you have a half-duplex connection, yes, the bandwidth consumption would double. --Kyle -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: The source and destination cannot both be remote :-(
7 maj 2010 kl. 21.20 skrev Kyle Lanclos: It would likely increase the latency, but it should not significantly impact the required bandwidth, assuming that you have a full-duplex connection. If you have a half-duplex connection, yes, the bandwidth consumption would double. I stand corrected and further educated. (And I really should get a better connection...) Great list! Christian -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
