Rsync acl patch 1.113 compilation problems on cygwin

2006-03-20 Thread Tevfik Karagülle
Hi,

Recently, there have been some fundamental achievements regarding
acl-support on the cygwin platform. I thought that it would be convenient to
offer an acl-patch enabled rsync as a part of the cwrsync package (a yet
another minimalist rsync on cygwin solution). I get some compilation errors.


What I did:

- Downloaded acl patch v1.113 from rsync site

- Run commands below In the rsync source directory:

 # make clean
 # patch  patches/acls_diff_1_113.txt
 # ./prepare-source
 # ./configure --enable-acl-support

   
checking whether to support ACLs... Using solaris ACLs
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating lib/dummy
config.status: creating zlib/dummy
config.status: creating popt/dummy
config.status: creating shconfig
config.status: creating config.h

rsync 2.6.7 configuration successful

 # make

gcc -I. -I. -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W -I./popt  -c rsync.c -o rsync.o
rsync.c:105: warning: unused parameter 'dflt_perms'
gcc -I. -I. -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W -I./popt  -c generator.c -o
generator.o
generator.c: In function `recv_generator':
generator.c:876: error: too few arguments to function `dest_mode'
generator.c: At top level:
generator.c:757: warning: 'dflt_perms' defined but not used
make: *** [generator.o] Error 1

-

I use gcc 3.4.4. 

Any ideas what I'm missing here ?

Rgrds

Tev

cwRsync maintainer

http://itefix.no/cwrsync
http://sf.net/projects/sereds


-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Re: Rsync acl patch 1.113 compilation problems on cygwin

2006-03-20 Thread Wayne Davison
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:40:33PM +0100, Tevfik Karag?lle wrote:
 rsync.c:105: warning: unused parameter 'dflt_perms'

This would seem to indicate that the 3rd hunk in the patch for rsync.c
didn't get applied:

@@ -116,7 +118,7 @@ mode_t dest_mode(mode_t flist_mode, mode
cur_mode |= (cur_mode  0444)  2;
}
} else
-   cur_mode = flist_mode  ACCESSPERMS  ~orig_umask;
+   cur_mode = flist_mode  ACCESSPERMS  dflt_perms;
if (daemon_chmod_modes  !S_ISLNK(flist_mode))
cur_mode = tweak_mode(cur_mode, daemon_chmod_modes);
return (flist_mode  ~CHMOD_BITS) | (cur_mode  CHMOD_BITS);

I tried applying revision 1.113 of the acls.diff to 2.6.7, and none of
the hunks failed, so I don't know what might have caused this for you.

 generator.c: In function `recv_generator':
 generator.c:876: error: too few arguments to function `dest_mode'

The dest_mode() call is at line 883 in both 2.6.7 and the CVS version of
generator.c, so something is quite different about your generator.c.
This hunk of the acls.diff patch added the extra arg to the dest_mode()
call:

@@ -871,7 +880,8 @@ static void recv_generator(char *fname, 
if (!preserve_perms) {
int exists = statret == 0
   S_ISDIR(st.st_mode) == S_ISDIR(file-mode);
-   file-mode = dest_mode(file-mode, st.st_mode, exists);
+   file-mode = dest_mode(file-mode, st.st_mode, dflt_perms,
+  exists);
}
 
if (S_ISDIR(file-mode)) {

 generator.c:757: warning: 'dflt_perms' defined but not used

This makes me think that several hunks failed to apply, since dflt_perms
is referenced in 3 of them (not countint the hunk that defined it).  Did
you apply other patches to the source prior to the acls.diff patch?

..wayne..
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


RE: Rsync acl patch 1.113 compilation problems on cygwin

2006-03-20 Thread Tevfik Karagülle

I applied a post-2.6.7 patch regarding exclude.c you sent via this mailing
list. I might apply the same patch set twice. Could it be the reason ?

I've downloaded sources and applied both patches again and everything works
as expected.

Thanks!

Tev



 -Original Message-
 From: Wayne Davison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: 20. mars 2006 18:48
 To: Tevfik Karagülle
 Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
 Subject: Re: Rsync acl patch 1.113 compilation problems on cygwin
 
 On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:40:33PM +0100, Tevfik Karag?lle wrote:
  rsync.c:105: warning: unused parameter 'dflt_perms'
 
 This would seem to indicate that the 3rd hunk in the patch 
 for rsync.c didn't get applied:
 
 @@ -116,7 +118,7 @@ mode_t dest_mode(mode_t flist_mode, mode
   cur_mode |= (cur_mode  0444)  2;
   }
   } else
 - cur_mode = flist_mode  ACCESSPERMS  ~orig_umask;
 + cur_mode = flist_mode  ACCESSPERMS  dflt_perms;
   if (daemon_chmod_modes  !S_ISLNK(flist_mode))
   cur_mode = tweak_mode(cur_mode, daemon_chmod_modes);
   return (flist_mode  ~CHMOD_BITS) | (cur_mode  CHMOD_BITS);
 
 I tried applying revision 1.113 of the acls.diff to 2.6.7, 
 and none of the hunks failed, so I don't know what might have 
 caused this for you.
 
  generator.c: In function `recv_generator':
  generator.c:876: error: too few arguments to function `dest_mode'
 
 The dest_mode() call is at line 883 in both 2.6.7 and the CVS 
 version of generator.c, so something is quite different about 
 your generator.c.
 This hunk of the acls.diff patch added the extra arg to the 
 dest_mode()
 call:
 
 @@ -871,7 +880,8 @@ static void recv_generator(char *fname, 
   if (!preserve_perms) {
   int exists = statret == 0
  S_ISDIR(st.st_mode) == S_ISDIR(file-mode);
 - file-mode = dest_mode(file-mode, st.st_mode, exists);
 + file-mode = dest_mode(file-mode, st.st_mode, 
 dflt_perms,
 +exists);
   }
  
   if (S_ISDIR(file-mode)) {
 
  generator.c:757: warning: 'dflt_perms' defined but not used
 
 This makes me think that several hunks failed to apply, since 
 dflt_perms is referenced in 3 of them (not countint the hunk 
 that defined it).  Did you apply other patches to the source 
 prior to the acls.diff patch?
 
 ..wayne..
 


--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html