Re: [rt-users] How to initiate a ticket in request tracker for an external supplier

2011-08-26 Thread John Rouillard
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:08:21AM -0400, Gilbert Rebeiro wrote:
 Is this too obvious?
 
 The needs are to initiate a ticket (email) that doesn't send an
 autoreply but is an email with the request showing the proper ticket
 number in subject line.
 This would then be sent to the organization (email address) that
 needs to perform the task:
 This way we can track the open task.
 We can have updates populate the ticket when they reply to the email.
 A RT user would be the requester in this case
 
 Is anyone doing this?
 There must be a way.

I would try installing the command by mail extention for RT
and using the:

AddCc: address Add new Cc watcher using the email address

command to add the email address of the vendor. I think the AddCc
occurs before the email notifications are sent. So if you use the
reply address with the normal notification scrips it should work.

This will result in an autoreply to the person opening the ticket, but
I think you want that as confirmation that the ticket was opened and
properly processed.

-- 
-- rouilj

John Rouillard   System Administrator
Renesys Corporation  603-244-9084 (cell)  603-643-9300 x 111

RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA  September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA  October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA  October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia  November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain  November 28  29, 2011


Re: [rt-users] tracking tickets which have been replied to?

2009-02-11 Thread John Rouillard
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:17:45PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
 Okay, this is so obvious of a requirement in a ticket system that I've  
 been spinning in circles assuming I'm overlooking something.  However,  
 I haven't found it, so could someone please clue me in how to do this?
 
 Ticket opened by a customer - needs response
 Ticket replied to by helpdesk - has been handled
 Ticket replied to by a customer - needs response again
 
 Unfortunately, I see nothing in RT which will highlight that message  
 and bring it up on anyone's screen as needing action.  Yes, an e-mail  
 will go out.  But I'm looking for the following kind of things:
 
 1. If not responded to within a given period, unassign from owner and/ 
or escalate in some visible fashion
 
 2. Bring it to the top of everyone's list as needing action.
 
 I'm guessing that the solution will rely on something like this:
 
 A) A global script to lower priority on Comment or Correspondence (or  
Resolve) below a certain number
 B) A global script to raise priority on update from customer above  
that certain number
 C) An rt-crontool script to annoy people about priority  certain  
number unanswered tickets
 
 Has anyone else already run down this road?

Not exactly what you are looking for, but I set the status to stalled
when I am waiting for input from the user.  Then the default global
script:

  On Correspond Open Tickets with template Blank 

will open the ticket again when the user (or anybody else) responds
normally (as opposed to responding with a comment).

A canned search for open tickets sorted by last updated time should
bubble it to the top of the list. I have such a bookmarked search
running as my status display every 10 minutes or so.

--
-- rouilj

John Rouillard
System Administrator
Renesys Corporation
603-244-9084 (cell)
603-643-9300 x 111
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] Editing Comments or Replies

2008-09-03 Thread John Rouillard
eOn Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 11:31:02AM -0400, Alan Cheng wrote:
 This RT user of ours used a different open source ticketing system
 before.  That system allows modifications to the Summary (almost
 equivalent to the email Subject:), Note and Description.  With this
 feature the user found it easy to update a ticket for future search
 without sifting through all the comments.  I believe the system logs the
 modifications so we know which user touched the Summary I guess.  But I
 don't believe it records exactly what changes were made so this still
 isn't good enough for auditing purpose...
 
 Will modifying the email subject line for a RT ticket break all the
 links (data, attachments, etc...)?  Just curious... 

I claim it shouldn't have any effect except that email messages coming
in with just the subject (but no ticket identifier) that could be
matched to the ticket's subject field won't be. But I think that
feature is only in the more recent RT's.

However, what I suggest is a custom summary/checklist text field. In
my (old version) of rt, the best I can do is an enter multiple
values custom field, which kind of bites for this purpose as it keeps
merging all the lines, but yours may operate better.

I implemented something similar for roundup's sysadmin tracker a while
back. It's useful for keeping things like other ticket/case numbers
from vendors, keywords for searching, checklists of open tasks up to
date.

-- 
-- rouilj

John Rouillard
System Administrator
Renesys Corporation
603-244-9084 (cell)
603-643-9300 x 111
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] Sharing a custom field between two queues

2008-01-01 Thread John Rouillard
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 09:06:23AM -0800, Gene LeDuc wrote:
 At 04:10 PM 12/21/2007, John Rouillard wrote:
 Hi all:
 
 I have two queues with a custom field called assets. If a ticket is in
 queue A, and I fill in the assets field it works fine as long as the
 ticket stays in queue A. When I move the ticket to queue B, the assets
 field is empty. If I move it back to queue A the field is once again
 filled. We have to change the queue of a ticket as part of the
 workflow.
 
 I saw that custom fields can be defined globally, but just two queues
 of some 20 queues on our RT installation should have an assets custom
 field.
 
 I've set up queues (in v3.6.3) that share custom fields and had it work 
 fine.  As I recall, you create the custom field globally and then assign it 
 to whatever queues you want.

Ok, I am using 3.2.2 and defining it globally, adds it for all queues.
There is no way to assign it to a queue. So guess I am out of luck
until I can upgrade.

Thanks for you help.

-- 
-- rouilj

John Rouillard
System Administrator
Renesys Corporation
603-643-9300 x 111
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

SAVE THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS ON RT SUPPORT:

If you sign up for a new RT support contract before December 31, we'll take
up to 20 percent off the price. This sale won't last long, so get in touch 
today. 
Email us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or call us at +1 617 812 0745.


Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


[rt-users] Sharing a custom field between two queues

2007-12-21 Thread John Rouillard
Hi all:

I have two queues with a custom field called assets. If a ticket is in
queue A, and I fill in the assets field it works fine as long as the
ticket stays in queue A. When I move the ticket to queue B, the assets
field is empty. If I move it back to queue A the field is once again
filled. We have to change the queue of a ticket as part of the
workflow.

I saw that custom fields can be defined globally, but just two queues
of some 20 queues on our RT installation should have an assets custom
field.

I am running RT 3.2.2, is this the way it's supposed to work, or is it
broken in 3.2.2? Is there some way to tell RT that the assets
field of queue A and the assets field of queue B are the same field?

-- 
-- rouilj

John Rouillard
System Administrator
Renesys Corporation
603-643-9300 x 111
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

SAVE THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS ON RT SUPPORT:

If you sign up for a new RT support contract before December 31, we'll take
up to 20 percent off the price. This sale won't last long, so get in touch 
today. 
Email us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or call us at +1 617 812 0745.


Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] Automatic ticket resolution

2006-08-07 Thread John Rouillard
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:23:42PM -0500, Bryce Porter wrote:
 I was wondering if it's possible to set a ticket to resolve itself  
 automatically after a given timeframe expires. For example, I've  
 placed tickets with some of my vendors, and they always tell me  
 we'll keep this ticket open for 24 hours just in case you want to re- 
 explore this issue or something similar. Any ideas?

Well, in a tracker I did for roundup, I just added a date and action
(state field) so that you coul specify a date on which the state (and
an optional message) were appended to the ticket. Then I used a cron
job to scan for dates that matched the current day and executed the
actions.

Something similar could be done in rt by adding a couple of custom
fields. It's sort of the same idea as escallation. Set the fields and
have an external cron job perform the action.

I don't know of anything ready out of the box though.

-- 
-- rouilj

John Rouillard
System Administrator
Renesys Corporation
603-643-9300 x 111
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com