Re: [rt-users] Rt 3.6 or 3.8 ?
Le 19/08/2008 à 17:47:25+0200, Rainer Duffner a écrit > Albert Shih schrieb: > > You (really) want to use the FreeBSD ports-system to install all the > stuff that RT requires - installing RT via ports is optional, IMO. > ATM, there's also no 3.8.x port anyway. OK. > > > "Supported" is probably a question of how much you pay BP. I think they > still support a number of customers with very old releases. OK. That's mean not for me > > Using it only by email is a bit weird, IMHO - it kind of negates all the > advantages the web-interface has over Inboxes.. Well I'm old-manand I'm going more speed with mutt/vi than with Firefox Thanks for the tips. Regards. -- Albert SHIH SIO batiment 15 Observatoire de Paris Meudon 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26 Heure local/Local time: Mar 19 aoû 2008 21:51:44 CEST ___ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
Re: [rt-users] Rt 3.6 or 3.8 ?
Albert Shih schrieb: > Hi all > > I'm running FreeBSD, and at this moment I don't have the rt36 ports > (freebsd package system). Of course I can install manually, but I'm a > little stupid about CPAN (OK I think If I very want to I can install 3.8, > but that's mean I don't use ports, and that s*** for maintaint uptodate all > ports). > > You (really) want to use the FreeBSD ports-system to install all the stuff that RT requires - installing RT via ports is optional, IMO. ATM, there's also no 3.8.x port anyway. > The second point is I'm just going to begin using RT. > > The third point is : I'm going to use RT with mail (less I can use web > interface more I feel confortable), so I don't knwon the compatibility > between 3.8 and something like Command by email" (see > http://wiki.bestpractical.com/ > view/Extensions). > > My question is : What time you think the 3.6 version can be supported ? Or > you advise is very to use 3.8 and don't start with 3.6 ? > "Supported" is probably a question of how much you pay BP. I think they still support a number of customers with very old releases. Using it only by email is a bit weird, IMHO - it kind of negates all the advantages the web-interface has over Inboxes.. cu, Rainer ___ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
[rt-users] Rt 3.6 or 3.8 ?
Hi all I'm running FreeBSD, and at this moment I don't have the rt36 ports (freebsd package system). Of course I can install manually, but I'm a little stupid about CPAN (OK I think If I very want to I can install 3.8, but that's mean I don't use ports, and that s*** for maintaint uptodate all ports). The second point is I'm just going to begin using RT. The third point is : I'm going to use RT with mail (less I can use web interface more I feel confortable), so I don't knwon the compatibility between 3.8 and something like Command by email" (see http://wiki.bestpractical.com/ view/Extensions). My question is : What time you think the 3.6 version can be supported ? Or you advise is very to use 3.8 and don't start with 3.6 ? Lots of thanks. -- Albert SHIH SIO batiment 15 Observatoire de Paris Meudon 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26 Heure local/Local time: Mar 19 aoû 2008 17:22:30 CEST ___ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
