Re: [RDT-Dev] Refactorings - initial import

2007-02-06 Thread Kyle Shank
Great news!

Markus what is the state of incorporating ruby-debug?

On 2/6/07, Markus Barchfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Christopher Williams wrote:
  There are still some things that need to be addressed:
 
  - Cruisecontrol: The plug-ins aren't built and integrated into the
  automated
  build yet and I'm not sure what needs to be done. Markus?
 OK. Build is up again. Your modifications to the feature.xml and
 svn_co_rdt were all right but I had to update the cruiseControlWorksapce
 on the server (cd /home/rdt/cruiseControlWorkspace; svn update).
 Furthermore I have added the refactoring.tests plug-in to the tests
 feature.

 BTW: two build failed because the subversion checkout was not complete,
 but I do not think that this is related to the refactoring plug-ins. I
 just assume that the sourceforge subversion service has not been very
 reliable.

 cheers
 Markus


 -
 Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
 Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
 Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
 http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
 ___
 Rubyeclipse-development mailing list
 Rubyeclipse-development@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rubyeclipse-development


-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Rubyeclipse-development mailing list
Rubyeclipse-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rubyeclipse-development


Re: [RDT-Dev] Another release

2006-04-11 Thread Kyle Shank
Any news on the update site?  I still can't access it.

On 4/10/06, Markus Barchfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Kyle Shank wrote:

 Are we ready to put up another release on the release update site?
 
 
 Hi Kyle,

 I've uploaded the RC1 to the release update site. It should not get the
 regular way to upload release candidates to the release update site, but
 you asked two weeks ago for the release and therefore the exception.

 Although it is uploaded the http requests for both
 download.rubypeople.org and updatesite.rubypeople.org were extremeley
 slow - it took several minutes to get an answer (no timeout, though).

 Since the upload with scp from the same machine was fine it seems to be
 an issue of the web server.
 John-Mason, could you have a look?


 Markus



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0944bid$1720dat1642
___
Rubyeclipse-development mailing list
Rubyeclipse-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rubyeclipse-development


[RDT-Dev] Re: RJS RXML support

2006-04-07 Thread Kyle Shank
Sorry, they are in the plugin properties file nvm :)

On 4/8/06, Kyle Shank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Have these been added to the Ruby Editor??  I'm not seeing it in CVS.



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0944bid$1720dat1642
___
Rubyeclipse-development mailing list
Rubyeclipse-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rubyeclipse-development


Re: [RDT-Dev] Getting another build of RDT

2006-04-04 Thread Kyle Shank
The RemoteTestRunner issue is a result of the new Rails integration
testing.  They define a default_test in
ActionController::IntegrationTest that gets picked up by the test
runner because it extends Test::Unit::TestCase.  What happens is that
if there are 9 real tests that all pass the bar will be green but the
view will show 9/10 tests with an empty block for the last one and
this default_test will appear in the test hierarchy.  As a hack I do a
check for the ActionController::IntegrationTest and bypass when it
attempts to get picked up.  I haven't committed the code or anything
but there needs to be a way to configure the test launcher to exclude
certain classes or just implement the hack.

On 4/4/06, Christopher Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 All,

  I think an 0.8.0 release (at least a release candidate) is do-able.
  We already have a lot of functionality since the 0.7.0 release, and
  it's been working fine for me (I patched bugs with the new browsing
  stuff locally, but until just now SF.net's CVS was down so I just
  checked them in).
 
  The only bug I'd like to see fixed for an 0.8.0 is the Fixnum
  syntax highlighting - we highlight numbers inside identifiers (like
  method names) when we shouldn't. Beyond that I'd encourage everyone
  to try out a copy of the nightly build and make sure what's in
  there is stable - particularly Ruby browsing, handling of RJS/RXML,
  the new class wizard, template insertion via content assist, code
  formatting and the goto matching bracket action.
 
  There's release related tasks I'd like to see happen as well, but
  they should be able to be done post-release - particularly, I'd
  like to use RadRails experience to help us create some single-
  download releases of 0.8.0 - so you pick the download for your
  platform and get the bare minimum stuff you need to run RDT (plus
  maybe some branding like splash loader screen, icon, etc).

 An additional couple notes:

 We should probably set up our plugins to enforce that they require
 the 3.1.x versions of eclipse plugins (we'd need to figure out which
 plugins and versions exactly) - so we can avoid our users trying RDT
 out on 3.2 and having all sorts of odd bugs.

 Next, I think immediately after this release we should target Eclipse
 3.2. They've released their last milestone build and the final 3.2
 should be coming by June.

 Thanks,
 Chris



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0944bid$1720dat1642
___
Rubyeclipse-development mailing list
Rubyeclipse-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rubyeclipse-development