Re: [rules-users] Validation in Guvnor fails due to unrecognized method of implemented interface
Hi Brody, Some things that you can try: 1. Try refreshing the browser after you have moved to 5.0.1. Maybe it is still using the old javascripts and that is why it is not showing the editors. 2. Try rebuilding the packages. 3. Move repository from 5.0.0.CR1 to 5.0.1 using the export/import that is under admin. Toni Brody bach wrote: Hi Edson, thanks for the reply.. how can I contact the guvnor people than? :) Or are they reading this too? Regards bb Edson Tirelli-3 wrote: Brody, This seems to be a serialization problem. Please, talk to the guvnor people on how to migrate between versions. []s Edson 2009/7/9 Brody bach brodyb...@yahoo.com Sooryfor reposting this one, Edson was expecting a feedback :) Hi Edson, sorry for the very late reply As I mentioned before, I had this problem in Guvnor. So I undeployed my old guvnor and redeploy a new one (the one I take fresh from website :), so it should be the latest version). Now I get a new problem: I can't open any rules I've created using the previous version. The exception I got: 12:06:26,171 INFO [STDOUT] [] DEBUG 01-07 12:06:26,171 (ServiceImplementation.java:loadRuleAsset:491) Load time taken for asset: 62 12:06:26,171 INFO [STDOUT] [] ERROR 01-07 12:06:26,171 (RepositoryServiceServlet.java:doUnexpectedFailure:69) com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.SerializationException: Type 'org.drools.guvnor.client.rpc.RuleAsset' was not assignable to 'com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.IsSerializable' and did not have a custom field serializer. For security purposes, this type will not be serialized. 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.SerializationException: Type 'org.drools.guvnor.client.rpc.RuleAsset' was not assignable to 'com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.IsSerializable' and did not have a custom field serializer. For security purposes, this type will not be serialized. 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.impl.LegacySerializationPolicy.validateSerialize(LegacySerializationPolicy.java:140) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.impl.ServerSerializationStreamWriter.serialize(ServerSerializationStreamWriter.java:581) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.impl.AbstractSerializationStreamWriter.writeObject(AbstractSerializationStreamWriter.java:129) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.impl.ServerSerializationStreamWriter$ValueWriter$8.write(ServerSerializationStreamWriter.java:146) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.impl.ServerSerializationStreamWriter.serializeValue(ServerSerializationStreamWriter.java:520) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.RPC.encodeResponse(RPC.java:573) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.RPC.encodeResponseForSuccess(RPC.java:441) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.RPC.invokeAndEncodeResponse(RPC.java:529) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.RemoteServiceServlet.processCall(RemoteServiceServlet.java:164) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.RemoteServiceServlet.doPost(RemoteServiceServlet.java:86) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:710) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:803) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at org.jboss.seam.web.ContextFilter$1.process(ContextFilter.java:42) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at org.jboss.seam.servlet.ContextualHttpServletRequest.run(ContextualHttpServletRequest.java:53) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at org.jboss.seam.web.ContextFilter.doFilter(ContextFilter.java:37) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at org.jboss.web.tomcat.filters.ReplyHeaderFilter.doFilter(ReplyHeaderFilter.java:96) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:230) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:175) 12:06:26,171 ERROR [STDERR] [] at
Re: [rules-users] Using field values of an ENUM in the decision table
Is the following rule in-valid?
when
$c: Computer()
eval($c.getMemory().getValue() == 512)
then
System.out.println( THIS IS IT XXX );
___
Can someone help me understand if eval is used incorrectly to invoke the
nested accessor method getValue()? Null pointer exceptions are thrown in
method org.drools.rule.EvalCondition.isAllowed
Thanks in advance,
-Visu
Visu Nageswaran wrote:
Hello, I am posting a simpler version of the actual requirement:
Class Computer has a field 'memory' of the enum type 'Memory' which is
defined over integer values
- - - - - - - - - -
public enum Memory{
MEM1(512), MEM2(1024), MEM3(2048);
public int value;
Memory(int i){this.value = i;}
public int getValue(){return value;}
}
- - - - - - - - - -
There is a requirement to model a decision table between memory and price
I am looking for the field constraint on the memory field to match to the
values:
memory.???-- Price
512 -- 100
1024 -- 200
2048 -- 300
I tried memory.name, memory.name(), memory.value, memory.getValue(); Does
this have to be done using template expressions say something like memory
== Memory.reverseLookupEnum($param)
Any help, pointers in this regard would be appreciated. thanks.
-Visu
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Using-field-values-of-an-ENUM-in-the-decision-table-tp24391112p24424994.html
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Hibernate Query delivers wrong values
Hi there! I'm working with the latest snapshot-releas of v5.1 (build3098-rev27324-20090630-0403). My application consists of two independent processes, both are repeated periodically (timer-node). the processes both have ruleset-nodes. some rules are querying a database with hibernate in the rule condition (LHS). the queried objects are then inserted into workinmemory (insert(object)), then some computation follows, the objects are modified and written back to db, and then the objects are retracted (retract(object)). Now to the problem: when I start the application, everything works correct, and leads to the right results. But when I change a field of a db-record manually, the hibernate-query delivers the old values!! (of course the changes are committed.) Anyone has an idea whats going wrong here? Is there some kind of caching mechanism that delivers the old objects instead of querying the database? greetz! tom -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
RE: [rules-users] Hibernate Query delivers wrong values
I assume ...but when I change a field of a db-record manually... means you go into the database and tweak a field? In which case this is definitely a hibernate session usage issue and I'd suggest you read up on the latter. With kind regards, Mike -Original Message- From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Zwifl Sent: 10 July 2009 11:46 To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org Subject: [rules-users] Hibernate Query delivers wrong values Hi there! I'm working with the latest snapshot-releas of v5.1 (build3098-rev27324-20090630-0403). My application consists of two independent processes, both are repeated periodically (timer-node). the processes both have ruleset-nodes. some rules are querying a database with hibernate in the rule condition (LHS). the queried objects are then inserted into workinmemory (insert(object)), then some computation follows, the objects are modified and written back to db, and then the objects are retracted (retract(object)). Now to the problem: when I start the application, everything works correct, and leads to the right results. But when I change a field of a db-record manually, the hibernate-query delivers the old values!! (of course the changes are committed.) Anyone has an idea whats going wrong here? Is there some kind of caching mechanism that delivers the old objects instead of querying the database? greetz! tom -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Using field values of an ENUM in the decision table
Modifying the eval expression to include a check for NULL got it working:
when
$c: Computer()
eval( $c.getMemory()!=null $c.getMemory().getValue().equals(512) )
then
System.out.println( THIS IS IT XXX );
end
Visu Nageswaran wrote:
Hello, I am posting a simpler version of the actual requirement:
Class Computer has a field 'memory' of the enum type 'Memory' which is
defined over integer values
- - - - - - - - - -
public enum Memory{
MEM1(512), MEM2(1024), MEM3(2048);
public int value;
Memory(int i){this.value = i;}
public int getValue(){return value;}
}
- - - - - - - - - -
There is a requirement to model a decision table between memory and price
I am looking for the field constraint on the memory field to match to the
values:
memory.???-- Price
512 -- 100
1024 -- 200
2048 -- 300
I tried memory.name, memory.name(), memory.value, memory.getValue(); Does
this have to be done using template expressions say something like memory
== Memory.reverseLookupEnum($param)
Any help, pointers in this regard would be appreciated. thanks.
-Visu
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Using-field-values-of-an-ENUM-in-the-decision-table-tp24391112p24426652.html
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Hibernate Query delivers wrong values
Yes, Hibernate caches in several ways. Go here: http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/stable/core/reference/en/html_single/ Search for cache. :) Some caching you can disable. (The 2nd level session factory cache.) http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/stable/core/reference/en/html_single/#configuration-optional-cacheprovider The cache on the session cannot be disabled, but you shouldn't be using hibernate sessions for the long term anyway. (i.e. a new one should be opened up each time the rule condition is evaluated.) --- On Fri, 7/10/09, Thomas Zwifl tom...@gmx.at wrote: From: Thomas Zwifl tom...@gmx.at Subject: [rules-users] Hibernate Query delivers wrong values To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org Date: Friday, July 10, 2009, 5:46 AM Hi there! I'm working with the latest snapshot-releas of v5.1 (build3098-rev27324-20090630-0403). My application consists of two independent processes, both are repeated periodically (timer-node). the processes both have ruleset-nodes. some rules are querying a database with hibernate in the rule condition (LHS). the queried objects are then inserted into workinmemory (insert(object)), then some computation follows, the objects are modified and written back to db, and then the objects are retracted (retract(object)). Now to the problem: when I start the application, everything works correct, and leads to the right results. But when I change a field of a db-record manually, the hibernate-query delivers the old values!! (of course the changes are committed.) Anyone has an idea whats going wrong here? Is there some kind of caching mechanism that delivers the old objects instead of querying the database? greetz! tom -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] ClassCastException when using an accumulate function on a locally declared type
This was a bug. It is fixed now. Thanks for reporting.
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-2202
Edson
2009/7/9 bill simms sitri...@gmail.com
Hello,
Recently I've been working with Drools version 5.0.1 to set up an event
processor. While doing so I have come
across difficulties with the accumulate function, in that it will always
throw a ClassCastException
when inserting events that are declared within my drl file. To illustrate
this I've set up an example which is
shown below. I've search Google and the mailing list for several hours,
but the only way past this problem
appears to be that I will have to declare a class externally and make sure
it implements Serializable. Does
anyone has suggestions for another approach? Secondly, I would have
assumed that since Drools was
compiling these internally declared classes, that Serializable would have
been implemented automatically. So
is this a result of the generated class not implementing Serializable, or
have I missed something in my rules
file? Thanks.
The important part of my drl file is:
declare TestEvent
@role( event )
@expires(10s)
id : String
end
#This rule works fine when 'Accumulate Count' is commented out, and is used
to make
#sure that the event inserting has worked.
rule Is It There
when
TestEvent() from entry-point test
then
System.out.println(Found a TestEvent.);
end
#This rule throws a ClassCastException when a TestEvent is inserted.
rule Accumulate Count
when
$n : Number() from accumulate($t : TestEvent() from entry-point
test,count($t))
then
System.out.println(Found + $n + events.);
end
The unit test does this:
FactType testEventType =
session.getKnowledgeBase().getFactType(com.drools.test, TestEvent);
for(int i = 0; i 10; i++){
Object testEvent = testEventType.newInstance();
testEventType.set(testEvent, id, id);
WorkingMemoryEntryPoint mainStream =
session.getWorkingMemoryEntryPoint(test);
mainStream.insert(event);
session.fireAllRules();
}
The exception I receive is:
org.drools.RuntimeDroolsException: java.lang.ClassCastException:
com.drools.test.TestEvent cannot be cast to java.io.Serializable
at org.drools.rule.Accumulate.accumulate(Accumulate.java:172)
at
org.drools.reteoo.AccumulateNode.modifyTuple(AccumulateNode.java:424)
at
org.drools.reteoo.AccumulateNode.assertObject(AccumulateNode.java:284)
at
org.drools.reteoo.SingleObjectSinkAdapter.propagateAssertObject(SingleObjectSinkAdapter.java:42)
at
org.drools.reteoo.PropagationQueuingNode$AssertAction.execute(PropagationQueuingNode.java:326)
at
org.drools.reteoo.PropagationQueuingNode.propagateActions(PropagationQueuingNode.java:221)
at
org.drools.reteoo.PropagationQueuingNode$PropagateAction.execute(PropagationQueuingNode.java:394)
at
org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.executeQueuedActions(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1486)
at org.drools.common.NamedEntryPoint.insert(NamedEntryPoint.java:158)
at org.drools.common.NamedEntryPoint.insert(NamedEntryPoint.java:122)
at org.drools.common.NamedEntryPoint.insert(NamedEntryPoint.java:80)
at org.drools.common.NamedEntryPoint.insert(NamedEntryPoint.java:28)
at com.drools.test.MyUnitTest.testEvents(EvaluationTest.java:66)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
at
org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringTestMethod.invoke(SpringTestMethod.java:160)
at
org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringMethodRoadie.runTestMethod(SpringMethodRoadie.java:233)
at
org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringMethodRoadie$RunBeforesThenTestThenAfters.run(SpringMethodRoadie.java:333)
at
org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringMethodRoadie.runWithRepetitions(SpringMethodRoadie.java:217)
at
org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringMethodRoadie.runTest(SpringMethodRoadie.java:197)
at
org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringMethodRoadie.run(SpringMethodRoadie.java:143)
at
org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.invokeTestMethod(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.java:160)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.runMethods(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:51)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner$1.run(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:44)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:27)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:37)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.run(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:42)
at
org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.run(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.java:97)
at
[rules-users] Drools Roadmap - Planned Release 5.1 release date
Hi, I was wondering if there is a planned release date for Release 5.1? Thank you, Daniel McDonald Fidelity National Information Services - Research Development Office phone: (972) 691-6593 Mobile phone (214) 697-8163 _ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _ ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Drools Roadmap - Planned Release 5.1 release date
McDonald, Daniel wrote: Hi, I was wondering if there is a planned release date for Release 5.1? end of this month, beginning of next. I high level overview, nothing concrete, is probably something like: BPM Process Console (embedded in Guvnor) BPMN2 (subset of) as default skin + extensions Embeded BPEL (ODE) + value add (guvnor storage, guvnor BPEL editor, unified deployment, integrated audit viwer). Simulation Test (with excel front end). WS/Rest Services Virtual Service Manager. Not sure on best name for this, but it should be the main way to request a session. All sessions support idle time/time to next job. This means we can create a priority queue of sessions and evict, for GC, sessions not doing much. This allows instant access to often used sessions and little often used sessions will be loaded from the DB and placed into the priority queue (think of it as a sort of cache). Incremental Changeset Support return of the .ddj deployment jar (5.2) RIO(jini) remoting which includes directory services. HA - load balancing and fault tollerance (5.2). Oryx web based flow editor (5.2) Thank you, Daniel McDonald Fidelity National Information Services - Research Development Office phone: (972) 691-6593 Mobile phone (214) 697-8163 _ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _ ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Detect rules changes at runtime using a push mechanism
Hi I read the drools documentation and this is what I find quote The KnowlegeAgent is created by the KnowlegeAgentFactory. The KnowlegeAgent provides automatic loading, caching and re-loading, of resources and is configured from a properties files. The KnowledgeAgent can update or rebuild this KnowlegeBase as the resources it uses are changed. The strategy for this is determined by the configuration given to the factory, but it is typically pull based using regular polling. We hope to add push based updates and rebuilds in future versions. unquote Is the push based update available in the latest version? or is there a way to get this done thru custom code? Thanks Ram rviswanathan wrote: Hi I am trying to detect rule changes (that I edit using Guvnor) at runtime in my java program. I was able to use the resource scanner (as provided in the drools documentation) to poll and get the changes. I am also trying to see the possibility of using a push based approach, instead of the polling. I see the classes for the ResourceChangeMonitor, ResourceChangeNotifier and ResourceChangeListener, but I am not sure how I should go about using these. I tried to use the following method on the ResourceChangeNotifier by passing in a listener implementation and the ChangeSet as the resource - but what do I implement inside this method? void subscribeResourceChangeListener(ResourceChangeListener listener, Resource resource) Is this approach correct? Thanks Ram -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Detect-rules-changes-at-runtime-using-a-push-mechanism-tp24421172p24432129.html Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] W3C published Last Call working drafts for Rule Interchange Format
The W3C RIF working group has published six Last Call working drafts [1]. Of particular interest here is the RIF Production Rule Dialect[2] which defines a language dialect for exchange of production rules. Please send any comments to public-rif-comme...@w3.org by July 31, 2009. Gary [1] http://www.w3.org/News/2009#item123 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-prd/ http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-core/ ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] looking for more information on drools expert
Hi Aldian, I think you misunderstood the semantics of forall(). Forall in Drools is the same forall quantifier from the First Order Logic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-order_logic So, if you want to write a rule that says: When for all equipments of type 'router' there is an alarm, then raise a general failure alarm. when forall( $e : Equipment( type == router ) Alarm( source == $e ) ) then // raise a general failure alarm end So, if you have 10 routers in the working memory and only 9 of them have associated alarms, this rule will NOT fire, because the condition is not matched. But, if an alarm is raised for the 10th router, then all of them have an associated alarm and the rule will fire. So, as you can see, forall is a quantifier CE, in the same way that not and exists are quantifiers. They operate on multiple facts at once, and as so, you can not use the variables bound inside their scope outside of it. In the above example, if you tried to use $e in the consequence, which of the 10 routers would it be bound to? So, since it makes no sense, the engine disallow the usage of variables bound inside quantifiers outside of them. Just to be easier to remember I call quantifier CEs scope delimiters. The general rule is: variables bound inside a scope delimiter are never available outside of them. I don't understand what you are trying to do in your first rule in your example. If you write your rule in plain English, the people from the list can help you write it correctly. Finally, just for completeness, be careful with the semantics of time. Your Alarm class is using the system clock to define timeout, and that will give you all kinds of headaches, not to mention wrong/unexpected results. But this e-mail is already too long. I suggest you take a look at the Drools Fusion docs on temporal reasoning. []s Edson 2009/7/10 Gab Aldian aldian...@gmail.com Hi everybody I have read with attention the drools expert documentation, which was very interesting, but a little 'too simple. For example, most examples don't present rules with the keyword forall. I also met big difficulties mixing the references on the objects to my javacode. This is why I would need some more documentation with examples that go deeper into drools capacities. To give you clues about my plan, here is an example (which works perfectly in drools 5) that I have developed: java code - http://drools.pastebin.com/m1a705614 rule code - http://drools.pastebin.com/m3f30cbdc As you can see I am studying the case where drools is used for the monitoring of a network of equipments that send alarms about their problems. But I have big difficulties, because I would like to get references on the objects of the forall, and to execute javacode such as $toto.method($titi, $tata), but such things seems impossible (systematic failed of compilation) Could you please help me? Thank you very much! Aldian ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Edson Tirelli JBoss Drools Core Development JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] WebService invocation from Drools Flow
bdoshi wrote: Hi, We have situation where we would like to invoke webservice call from our process flow. Is there out of box component like email, log, WS-HumanTask etc. for invoking webservice? Seems like we have to make use of WorkItem and implement within WorkItemHandler. Is that the right and recommended approach? I think so. If you make a WS invocation work items, ideally with CXF, then do please contribute it back. Mark Thanks, ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
