Re: [rules-users] rule limit
On 6 October 2011 01:09, Davide Sottara dso...@gmail.com wrote: As far as I know, the parser does not check the number of rules in a DRL Maybe you could do something like this: (i) use a KnowledgeBuilder to load the DRL resource; (ii) before you add the packages to the knowledgeBase, iterate over kBuilder.getKnowledgePackages() to find the package generated from your DRL; (iii) use getRules().size() on the package to check if the number of rules exceeds your desired threshold This would limit the number of rules per package and not per DRL file. Crude and not foolproof, but very cheap is a bash oneliner: LIMIT=10; PATH=some.drl; if [ $(grep '^\s*rule\' $PATH | wc -l) -gt $LIMIT ]; then echo more than $LIMIT rules in $PATH; fi -W D. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-rule-limit-tp3394660p3398277.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] rule limit
For an even less technical solution you could have a person with a big stick standing behind the users... I think what we are all wondering is why you want to limit the number of rules! Thomas -Original Message- From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users- boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Laun Sent: 06 October 2011 08:14 To: Rules Users List Subject: Re: [rules-users] rule limit On 6 October 2011 01:09, Davide Sottara dso...@gmail.com wrote: As far as I know, the parser does not check the number of rules in a DRL Maybe you could do something like this: (i) use a KnowledgeBuilder to load the DRL resource; (ii) before you add the packages to the knowledgeBase, iterate over kBuilder.getKnowledgePackages() to find the package generated from your DRL; (iii) use getRules().size() on the package to check if the number of rules exceeds your desired threshold This would limit the number of rules per package and not per DRL file. Crude and not foolproof, but very cheap is a bash oneliner: LIMIT=10; PATH=some.drl; if [ $(grep '^\s*rule\' $PATH | wc -l) -gt $LIMIT ]; then echo more than $LIMIT rules in $PATH; fi -W D. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-rule-limit-tp3394660p339 8277.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ** This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the postmas...@nds.com and delete it from your system as well as any copies. The content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be monitored by NDS for employment and security purposes. To protect the environment please do not print this e-mail unless necessary. NDS Limited. Registered Office: One London Road, Staines, Middlesex, TW18 4EX, United Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales. Registered no. 3080780. VAT no. GB 603 8808 40-00 ** ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] rule limit
The author gets paid (by slyfox (!)) according to the number of rules ;-) -W On 6 October 2011 10:24, Swindells, Thomas tswinde...@nds.com wrote: For an even less technical solution you could have a person with a big stick standing behind the users... I think what we are all wondering is why you want to limit the number of rules! Thomas -Original Message- From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users- boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Laun Sent: 06 October 2011 08:14 To: Rules Users List Subject: Re: [rules-users] rule limit On 6 October 2011 01:09, Davide Sottara dso...@gmail.com wrote: As far as I know, the parser does not check the number of rules in a DRL Maybe you could do something like this: (i) use a KnowledgeBuilder to load the DRL resource; (ii) before you add the packages to the knowledgeBase, iterate over kBuilder.getKnowledgePackages() to find the package generated from your DRL; (iii) use getRules().size() on the package to check if the number of rules exceeds your desired threshold This would limit the number of rules per package and not per DRL file. Crude and not foolproof, but very cheap is a bash oneliner: LIMIT=10; PATH=some.drl; if [ $(grep '^\s*rule\' $PATH | wc -l) -gt $LIMIT ]; then echo more than $LIMIT rules in $PATH; fi -W D. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-rule-limit-tp3394660p339 8277.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ** This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the postmas...@nds.com and delete it from your system as well as any copies. The content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be monitored by NDS for employment and security purposes. To protect the environment please do not print this e-mail unless necessary. NDS Limited. Registered Office: One London Road, Staines, Middlesex, TW18 4EX, United Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales. Registered no. 3080780. VAT no. GB 603 8808 40-00 ** ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Get previous fact from working memory.
Hello everyone, I think my problem is quite simple, but still, I can't come up with a solution. What I want to do is compare the last fact with the current one and I'm wondering how to do that. That's how I check if the EventType of the current Event is EVENT1. What I want to do now is check if the EventType of the current Event is EVENT1 and EventType of the previous Event is EVENT2. How can I do that? Thanks very much in advance, Martin -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Get-previous-fact-from-working-memory-tp3399064p3399064.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Get previous fact from working memory.
This depends on how you represent current and previous in your fact/event objects. -W On 6 October 2011 10:58, tungl mar...@seafoid.org wrote: Hello everyone, I think my problem is quite simple, but still, I can't come up with a solution. What I want to do is compare the last fact with the current one and I'm wondering how to do that. That's how I check if the EventType of the current Event is EVENT1. What I want to do now is check if the EventType of the current Event is EVENT1 and EventType of the previous Event is EVENT2. How can I do that? Thanks very much in advance, Martin -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Get-previous-fact-from-working-memory-tp3399064p3399064.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Get previous fact from working memory.
So, if I get you right, I have to, for example, store some kind of time stamp in my event object and compare it? My definition of previous simply depended on the order, the objects were inserted into the working memory. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Get-previous-fact-from-working-memory-tp3399064p3399079.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Get previous fact from working memory.
Title: CARTE DE VISITE
No need to store a explicit timestamp, drools will do that for you.
Your first option is a rule like this :
rule "check_agains_last"
when
$e1 : EVENT1()
$e2 : EVENT2(this before $e1)
not EVENT2(this after $e2)
then
...
end
Your second option is to implement a WorkingMemoryEventListener,
and implement the objectInserted method to store the last events
inserted (a simple 2 sized rolling stack will do the job), and
another that return the "previous" inserted Event object (the second
element of your stack).
this leads to a rule like this :
rule "check_agains_last"
when
$e1 : EVENT1()
eval (PreviousEventListener.getPreviousEvent() instanceof
EVENT2)
then
...
end
But in this last solution, you may fall into problem if two events
are inserted in seom other thread while the rules are processed. In
fact, I think you need "the event before another event", and not
"the previous of the last one" (the "last one" may be not the one
matched in your rule). Mays be your listener can be used to set, in
a new event that is inserted, the reference to the last one
inserted, something like that:
class PreviousEventListener implements WorkingMemoryEventListener
{
private Object lastInserted;
public void objectInserted (ObjectInsertedEventevent)
{
event.getObject().setLastEvent( lastInserted ); // check
class before of course ...
lastInserted = event.getObject();
}
}
rule "check_agains_last"
when
$e1 : EVENT1(...)
$e2 : EVENT2(...) from $e1.getLastEvent()
then
...
end
Le 06/10/2011 11:06, tungl a crit:
So, if I get you right, I have to, for example, store some kind of time stamp
in my event object and compare it?
My definition of "previous" simply depended on the order, the objects were
inserted into the working memory.
--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Get-previous-fact-from-working-memory-tp3399064p3399079.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Vincent
LEGENDRE
Consultant
Snior
EURODECISION
9A
rue de la Porte de Buc 78000 VERSAILLES
Tl. : +33 (0)1 39 07 12 40
Direct : +33 (0)1 39 07 26 16
www.eurodecision.com
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Get previous fact from working memory.
Thank you very much. I'll try that. But there's another small problem I've just faced. I'm trying to insert a new Event object into the working memory. I can do that with but results in What am I doing wrong? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Get-previous-fact-from-working-memory-tp3399064p3399156.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Get previous fact from working memory.
like in plain java : declare the type of your new variable before its name ... Event $e = new Event(...); insert($e); ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] ksession.insert() executes sequentially in multithreaded StatefulKnowledgeSessions
Hello,
I'm having trouble when trying to insert() facts inside parallel
StatefulKnowledgeSessions. From a main() java program I start multiple
threads. Every thread creates new KnowledgeBase and every KnowledgeBase
creates new StatefulKnowledgeSession so I have one StatefulKnowledgeSession
in every thread. Once StatefulKnowledgeSession has been created, I insert
lots of facts in each StatefulKnowledgeSession.
What was expected? I expected to run insert() in parallel, each insert
inside its thread StatefulKnowledgeSession. 4 threads inserting lots of
facts inside its own StatefulKnowledgeSession is expected to run in parallel
and see how CPU usage increases.
What have I seen? when all threads are inserting facts in its own
StatefulKnowledgeSession I can see that only one CPU is being used so there
is no parallel insertion in different StatefulKnowledgeSession.
Is there a synchronization inside insert() code? It's so strange. Even if i
try with 12 threads, I can't see a CPU usage increase when executing
parallel insert() inside different StatefulKnowledgeSession (threads).
Help please.
This is my thread code (no static objects):
public class KnowledgeSessionThread extends Thread {
private StatefulKnowledgeSession session;
private Message[] facts;
public KnowledgeSessionThread(Message[] facts) throws Exception {
session = readKnowledgeBase().newStatefulKnowledgeSession();
this.facts = facts;
}
public void run() {
try {
for( int i = 0; i facts.length; i++ ) {
session.insert(facts[i]);
}
session.startProcess(flowId);
session.fireAllRules();
session.dispose();
System.out.println(Thread finished);
} catch( Exception e ) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
private KnowledgeBase readKnowledgeBase() throws Exception {
KnowledgeBuilder kbuilder =
KnowledgeBuilderFactory.newKnowledgeBuilder();
kbuilder.add(ResourceFactory.newClassPathResource(Sample.drl),
ResourceType.DRL);
kbuilder.add(ResourceFactory.newClassPathResource(Sample.bpmn),
ResourceType.BPMN2);
KnowledgeBuilderErrors errors = kbuilder.getErrors();
if (errors.size() 0) {
for (KnowledgeBuilderError error: errors) {
System.err.println(error);
}
throw new IllegalArgumentException(Could not parse
knowledge.);
}
KnowledgeBase kbase = KnowledgeBaseFactory.newKnowledgeBase();
kbase.addKnowledgePackages(kbuilder.getKnowledgePackages());
return kbase;
}
}
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/ksession-insert-executes-sequentially-in-multithreaded-StatefulKnowledgeSessions-tp3399339p3399339.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] IllegalStateException happens when ResourceChangeScanner working on Version 5.3.0.CR1
I have already reported this issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733008 On 10/04/2011 02:56 PM, Oliver Liu wrote: Hi Guys, I want to upgrade drools from 5.1.1 to 5.3.0 CR1, but i found ResourceChangeScanner could't work. In version 5.1.1, i wrote this code to get a KnowledgeAgent KnowledgeAgent kagent = KnowledgeAgentFactory.newKnowledgeAgent(ReleaseAgent); kagent.addEventListener(new ReloadingRuleEventListener(this)); kagent.applyChangeSet(ResourceFactory.newClassPathResource(changeset-url.xml)); changeset-url.xml content is like: change-set xmlns='http://drools.org/drools-5.0/change-set' xmlns:xs='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xs:schemaLocation='http://drools.org/drools-5.0/change-set http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/labs/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-api/src/main/resources/change-set-1.0.0.xsd' add resource source='http://hostname:8080/drools-guvnor/org.drools.guvnor.Guvnor/package/PackageName1/snapshot_release' type='PKG' basicAuthentication=enabled username=user1 password=123456 / resource source='http://hostname:8080/drools-guvnor/org.drools.guvnor.Guvnor/package/PackageName2/snapshot_release' type='PKG' basicAuthentication=enabled username=user1 password=123456 / resource source='http://hostname:8080/drools-guvnor/org.drools.guvnor.Guvnor/package/PackageName3/snapshot_release' type='PKG' basicAuthentication=enabled username=user1 password=123456 / /add /change-set then wrote this code to scan if there is a new version snapshot on guvnor ResourceChangeScannerConfiguration sconf = ResourceFactory .getResourceChangeScannerService() .newResourceChangeScannerConfiguration(); sconf.setProperty(drools.resource.scanner.interval,60); ResourceFactory.getResourceChangeScannerService().configure(sconf); ResourceFactory.getResourceChangeScannerService().start(); ResourceFactory.getResourceChangeNotifierService().start(); It works very well, each time when ResourceChangeScanner finding there is new snapshot, it can reload the rules from guvnor properly. But when i updated to 5.3.0 CR1, ran this code, error happens: Exception in thread Thread-2 java.lang.IllegalStateException: reader does have a modified date at org.drools.io.impl.ReaderResource.getLastModified(ReaderResource.java :64) at org.drools.io.impl.ResourceChangeScannerImpl.scan(ResourceChangeScann erImpl.java:169) at org.drools.io.impl.ResourceChangeScannerImpl$ProcessChangeSet.run(Res ourceChangeScannerImpl.java:326) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) It seems in new version, UrlResource was parsed to ReaderResource(i rememer in 5.1.1, each resource in changeset-url.xml was parsed to UrlResource). Can you give a help? Thanks a lot -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/IllegalStateException-happens-when-ResourceChangeScanner-working-on-Version-5-3-0-CR1-tp3393027p3393027.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] rule limit
thanks for all of the responses, fun to read :) Sorry I thought it was pretty strait forward question. I would assume somehow the parser 'knows' how many rules are in a drl file I do not want an over ambitious user to just create rule after rule after rule (though I suppose he could technically do a lot even in one rule) rule a //1 when then end rule b //2 when then end rule c //3 when then end and so on... -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-rule-limit-tp3394660p3400312.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Cookbook: How to test rules using xUnit
Hi all, Not sure why the syntax highlighter is not working on the blog, but in any case, you can read the content. http://blog.athico.com/2011/10/cookbook-how-to-test-rules-using-xunit.html Hopefully it will be helpful to some people. Edson -- Edson Tirelli JBoss Drools Core Development JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Get previous fact from working memory.
Thanks Vincent, but when I do it like this: It's sufficient that EVENT2 has happened anywhere before EVENT1. So EVENT1, EVENT2 = false, false EVENT2, EVENT1 = false, true (that's right, but:) EVENT2, EVENT1, EVENT1 = false, true, true (?) How do I fix that? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Get-previous-fact-from-working-memory-tp3399064p3400371.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Get previous fact from working memory.
This is handled by simply using the before temporal operator: $e1: Event1() $e2: Event2( this before $e1 ) -W On 6 October 2011 19:09, tungl mar...@seafoid.org wrote: Thanks Vincent, but when I do it like this: It's sufficient that EVENT2 has happened anywhere before EVENT1. So EVENT1, EVENT2 = false, false EVENT2, EVENT1 = false, true (that's right, but:) EVENT2, EVENT1, EVENT1 = false, true, true (?) How do I fix that? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Get-previous-fact-from-working-memory-tp3399064p3400371.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Get previous fact from working memory.
Title: CARTE DE VISITE Hum, rigth ... You want the last to be false ? may be something like that (ignore the type first to get the last, then test it in a eval) rule "check_agains_last" when $e1 : Event (eventType == Event.EventType.EVENT1) $e2 : Event (this before $e1) not Event (this after $e2) eval ($e2.getEventType() == Event.EventType.EVENT2) then ... end But to me this rule is too complex according to what it tells ... You should implement the chaining via the listener. Le 06/10/2011 19:09, tungl a crit: Thanks Vincent, but when I do it like this: It's sufficient that EVENT2 has happened anywhere before EVENT1. So EVENT1, EVENT2 = false, false EVENT2, EVENT1 = false, true (that's right, but:) EVENT2, EVENT1, EVENT1 = false, true, true (?) How do I fix that? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Get-previous-fact-from-working-memory-tp3399064p3400371.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Vincent LEGENDRE Consultant Snior EURODECISION 9A rue de la Porte de Buc 78000 VERSAILLES Tl. : +33 (0)1 39 07 12 40 Direct : +33 (0)1 39 07 26 16 www.eurodecision.com ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] The database returned no natively generated identity value
Hi, I am trying to get a webapp ported from oracle to db2. I managed to get all the sql loaded in but it is now failing with the above error. After a day's searching (I am not a web-developer by trade so please bear with me) I managed to do a DB2 Driver trace and possibly narrow down my problem to a table drools appears to create SessionInfo One of the columns is an id field that hibernate appears to be populating with the following sql Shortly after I am receiving the following stack trace (apppended to the foot of this query). I feel like there ought to be a trigger or something that would actually populate the id field but hibernate seems to have problems. For all the tables we have created we have created sequence numbers where appropriate and are used by annotations in the code I am not sure how to do the same for this generated table Cheers for looking. As promised the stack -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/The-database-returned-no-natively-generated-identity-value-tp3400770p3400770.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] rule limit
Am 06.10.2011 18:48, schrieb slyfox: thanks for all of the responses, fun to read :) Sorry I thought it was pretty strait forward question. I would assume somehow the parser 'knows' how many rules are in a drl file I do not want an over ambitious user to just create rule after rule after rule (though I suppose he could technically do a lot even in one rule) You probably can't prevent him from doing it first hand. But when it comes to compiling/loading the rules, you can of course check the number of rules and issue an error message if it exceeds your limit. See answer by Davide Sottara for technical details. However I'm still not convinced that this rather technical measure will make your life easier in the long run. Still having the impression that educating the user of your system to find a useful structure in their rules will pay off more than just putting up road closed signs. Best regards Ansgar ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] NPE in SlidingTimeWindow$SlidingTimeWindowComparator
I'm getting a null pointer exception on either line 232 or 233 of SlidingTimeWindow. The only window I'm using is: rule Mark up to date timer(int: 5m) when $store: Store() exists (SensorReading (this.store == $store) over window:time(5m)) then ... end The rule never fires; this happens when the sliding time window is expiring tuples. It appears the comparator needs to handle nulls, but there's nothing in the JavaDocs about that. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] best design pattern for fusion stream
I have a trading application that currently handles a fair amount of messages
per second, generally in the thousands. Soon it will handle 10s and perhaps
hundreds of thousands of messages.
I have not done any load testing yet but while I am here I figured I should
ask if there are any known limitations that I may run in to?
Presently my trading app handles price quotes by consuming an amqp queue
bound to a topic:
try {
q = quotes.poll(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
if (q != null)
handleIncomingQuote(q);
} catch ...
I would like to use fusion so that I can get the code infrastructure done
and then hopefully never have to deal with code again for writing my
strategies, ideally all of that will be in the form of rules.
So I am at a point where I need to learn the camel integration piece so that
fusion will consume the amqp feed.
However, and this is my question, general practice is not to immediately do
any work on incoming message, currently I add to a LinkedBlockingQueue and
then pick up from another thread (shown above). So should I even worry
about the AMQP/Camel integration? It would seem to me that if fusion is
acting on each event this could become an eventual bottleneck. I wonder if
I would be better off manually inserting my incoming quotes into the entry
point in the manner that I have above, essentially by replacing
handleIncomingQuote(q) with EntryPoint.insert(q)?
Or does the working memory handle the buffering for me? Looking at the
Stream and Entry point doc I would say there is a chance but I am not
certain.
Thanks
Bobby
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/best-design-pattern-for-fusion-stream-tp3401432p3401432.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Guvnor - Operations with snapshots
Hi again. I have been able to use guvnor package versions with some success.. Is there any service I can call to create a new version? I have checked that it seems to change the package version when you click on save package. Can I have some URL to achieve it automatically? Thanks Demian On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Demian Calcaprina calcacue...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks Jervis. I currently use Guvnor 5.2, and saw that I can use version so I will try to use them. - Is there something I will be missing about versions, by using 5.2? - Do you know when a new version is created? With Snapshots, I could choose when to create a new one. How about versions? Thanks! Demian 2011/10/3 jliu j...@redhat.com On 2011/10/4 1:54, Demian Calcaprina wrote: Hi everyone. I am using Guvnor 5.2, and I need to make some operations from my application. Specifically, I need to make two operations remotely: - List Snapshots, as it is possible to list packages. - Create a new snapshot from a package. Is this possible to make these operation through rest API? Hi, Start from 5.3, Guvnor Packages are fully versioned. I would recommend you to use a vesioned package instead of package snapshot. Package snapshot will be deprecated in the future. Cheers, Jervis Thanks, Demian ___ rules-users mailing listrules-users@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
