Re: [rules-users] add guvnor-webapp-core as a dependency to project
I doubt there are any docs for this yet :) Unfortunately at this point you need to check where the modules you need are yourself. Just search for the class in guvnor repository that implements the interface, they should be all there. I would also like to warn you that the module structure in Guvnor will change before 6.0 gets out. Toni On Mar 1, 2013, at 7:05 PM, kooper wrote: Ok, I think I got it(but I could be wrong). It seems that I cannot use guvnor-webapp-core as a dependency, outside of guvnor-webapp-drools war. As guvnor-webapp-core has CDI annotations on interfaces and and abstract classes that are not implemented in guvnor-webapp-core. So I need to implement them in my app before deploying, think just missed smth during documentation reading. Thanks everyone for your help :). -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/add-guvnor-webapp-core-as-a-dependency-to-project-tp4022632p4022656.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] deadlock
Can you please try the snapshots marked as 5.5.1 (which is actually for the 5.6 release) and let us know if you still have problems: http://snapshots.jboss.org/maven2/org/drools/drools-core/ We will also need some sort of test case to reproduce the issue. Mark On 5 Mar 2013, at 04:12, Smita S. Deshpande smita.deshpa...@mastek.com wrote: Hi, We are currently using drools 5.0.1 for processing business rules. But we are currently facing an issue where if we invoke the rule using 10 concurrent requests , thread gets locked . The error is as below . Deadlock/Blocked Monitor Owns Monitor Lock on org/drools/rule/JavaDialectRuntimeData$PackageClassLoader@0E99F9B8/0E99F9C4 Waiting for Monitor Lock on org/drools/rule/CompositeClassLoader@0DB50DC0/0DB50DCC Java Stack at java/lang/ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:606(Compiled Code)) at java/lang/Class.forNameImpl(Native Method) at java/lang/Class.forName(Class.java:163(Compiled Code)) at org/drools/rule/JavaDialectRuntimeData$PackageClassLoader.loadClass(JavaDialectRuntimeData.java:458(Compiled Code)) at java/lang/ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:606(Compiled Code)) at /Rule_AutoUW_Rule_BR12Constants_153_0ConsequenceInvoker.evaluate(Rule_AutoUW_Rule_BR12Constants_153_0ConsequenceInvoker.java:16) at org/drools/common/DefaultAgenda.fireActivation(DefaultAgenda.java:934(Compiled Code)) at org/drools/common/DefaultAgenda.fireNextItem(DefaultAgenda.java:885(Compiled Code)) at org/drools/common/DefaultAgenda.fireAllRules(DefaultAgenda.java:1086(Compiled Code)) at org/drools/common/AbstractWorkingMemory.fireAllRules(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:661(Compiled Code)) at org/drools/common/AbstractWorkingMemory.fireAllRules(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:637(Compiled Code)) at org/drools/reteoo/ReteooStatelessSession.execute(ReteooStatelessSession.java:203(Compiled Code)) Can you please advice .This has been occurring on Production systems and causing failures Thanks Regards, Smita Deshpande Technical Specialist - DU UK Insurance Mastek Ltd | Cerebrum,2nd Floor, KalyaniNagar, Pune, Maharashtra, INDIA (M)(0)9823041314 | (T) 91 20 66072000 Extn - 2256 | VOIP: 729 | www.mastek.com Email:- smita.deshpa...@mastek.com MASTEK LTD. In the US, we're called MAJESCOMASTEK ~~ Opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not that of Mastek Limited, unless specifically indicated to that effect. Mastek Limited does not accept any responsibility or liability for it. This e-mail and attachments (if any) transmitted with it are confidential and/or privileged and solely for the use of the intended person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. This e-mail and its attachments have been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. It is the responsibility of the recipient to run the virus check on e-mails and attachments before opening them. If you have received this e-mail in error, kindly delete this e-mail from desktop and server. ~~ ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] add guvnor-webapp-core as a dependency to project
Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/add-guvnor-webapp-core-as-a-dependency-to-project-tp4022632p4022687.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Potential memory leak in package analysis tool in Guvnor 5.3
I have recently been looking at upgrading our installation from 5.1 to 5.3 (latest supported by RedHat). As part of this I noticed the Package Analysis tool so I started experimenting with it. All that happens is that I get an exceptio message in the JBoss AS server.log file and an apparent memory leak. The exception relates to a SerializationException thrown by VerificationService.analysePackage and contains many (many) Verifier Errors saying quote [ERR 107] Line 2:0 mismatched input 'when' expecting one of the following tokens: '[package, import, global, declare, function, rule, query]'. /quote Using jvisualvm, I can see that the memory usage takes a step jump each time I use the analysis tool and eventually (actually after only 2 usages) I get OutOfMemoryErrors. The package compiles just fine. Is there a known problem with the analysis tool? Chris Selwyn ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Guvnor Authentication
rjr201 wrote: Hi, I'm still struggling to get authentication to work with Guvnor 5.5 on JBoss 7. Can anyone confirm that the fix described here is still necessary/correct with Guvnor 5.5? http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-configure-Guvnor-5-4-JAAS-with-jboss-7-0-2-td4020424.html You probably ran into the same problem reported by https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1986, which is caused by a Seam security bug. If this is the case, you can either wait for 5.6.0 release or you can work around the problem based on the article described above. Cheers, Jervis It feels strange that I have to change the source code for something so common as authentication. Any insight anyone can give me on doing this would be really helpful. Thanks in advance, Rich. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-Authentication-tp4022675.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Guvnor Authentication
Thanks for your reply. I'll take a look at that. Do you know when 5.6 will be released? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-Authentication-tp4022675p4022691.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Is it possible to compare the hashmap values in Drools Spreadsheet
Hi.. i have a code which should compare the two column values through hashmap in drools spreadsheet. when i parsed the code from spreadsheet to .drl file, there is '/' is appending to code. Please have a look on the attached document and help me in solving the issue. Drools_SpreadsheetIssue.docx http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4022692/Drools_SpreadsheetIssue.docx -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-compare-the-hashmap-values-in-Drools-Spreadsheet-tp4022692.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Is it possible to compare the hashmap values in Drools Spreadsheet
Hello, This is by design, see https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/blob/master/drools-decisiontables/src/main/java/org/drools/decisiontable/parser/ActionType.java#L179 If a cell value contains some textquotation marksome textquotation markmore text the quotation marks are assume to be part of the value and escaped. This can be overridden using EscapeQuotes false flag in the RuleSet properties section. On 5 March 2013 13:58, kareemsk7 shaikabdul.kar...@igate.com wrote: Hi.. i have a code which should compare the two column values through hashmap in drools spreadsheet. when i parsed the code from spreadsheet to .drl file, there is '/' is appending to code. Please have a look on the attached document and help me in solving the issue. Drools_SpreadsheetIssue.docx http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4022692/Drools_SpreadsheetIssue.docx -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-compare-the-hashmap-values-in-Drools-Spreadsheet-tp4022692.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Is it possible to compare the hashmap values in Drools Spreadsheet
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4022694/sheet.png The code which you shared is to create xl-sheet using java code. but in my scenario, rules will be set directly in Xl-sheet. I will share my xl-sheet for your reference. i am comparing values dynamically from hashmap through bean. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-compare-the-hashmap-values-in-Drools-Spreadsheet-tp4022692p4022694.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Is it possible to compare the hashmap values in Drools Spreadsheet
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4022695/java_code2.png http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4022695/java_code.png i am sharing my java code as well for your reference. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-compare-the-hashmap-values-in-Drools-Spreadsheet-tp4022692p4022695.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Change in eval mvel syntax from 5.1 to 5.3
I have been using 5.1 for some time and am looking to upgrade. I have found that, where in 5.1, I used to be able to write $jd: JobDetails( eval ( $t = [MTSURVEY, MTINSTALL, MTEXCHANGE, MTMAINT]; !($t contains getJobType(businessArea, templateJobId) )) ) However, in 5.3.1 this now produces a syntax error as follows:- [CheckJobType] [ERR 101] Line 9:9 no viable alternative at input '$t' in rule CheckJobType [CheckJobType] Parser returned a null Package I have found that I have to now code the condition as follows:- $jd: JobDetails( eval (!([MTSURVEY, MTINSTALL, MTEXCHANGE, MTMAINT] contains getJobType(businessArea, templateJobId) )) ) It is a relatively minor thing but I am curious as to why I should have to recode this. What has changed to cause me to do this? What other incompatibilities exist? Chris ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Is it possible to compare the hashmap values in Drools Spreadsheet
The code I linked is within them drools-decisiontable module; it was for your information. Add EscapeQuotes false to the RuleSet properties and your XLS should translate to the DRL you expect. On 5 March 2013 14:43, kareemsk7 shaikabdul.kar...@igate.com wrote: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4022695/java_code2.png http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4022695/java_code.png i am sharing my java code as well for your reference. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-compare-the-hashmap-values-in-Drools-Spreadsheet-tp4022692p4022695.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Decision tables - maintenance workflow - best practices
I am planning to load the decision tables into a KnowledgeBase and cache it in Infinispan so that it can be accessed by all app instances. Since the rules dont change frequently, the loader script can be run whenever there is an update. This makes the XLS files stay along with the loader and not scattered across instances, but i would like to know from the community how it's handled - without Guvnor. Please refer original question in thread. -ja -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Decision-tables-maintenance-workflow-best-practices-tp4021191p4022698.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] drools linkage errors
Hi, Initially I am using jboss-drool 5.0.1 version in our project and I updated to jboss-drools 5.4.0 version in our project but I am getting linkage errors as mentioned below. *java.lang.LinkageError: loader (instance of org/drools/rule/JavaDialectRuntimeData$PackageClassLoader): attempted* *duplicate class definition for name: com/ds/rule/vm/fvm/ruleengine/Rule_Product_has_minimum_number_of_valid_quotes_5263d589f8864649bbb734bada7a54ed * *at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) [rt.jar:1.6.0_30]* *at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClassCond(ClassLoader.java:631) [rt.jar:1.6.0_30]* *at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:615) [rt.jar:1.6.0_30]* *at org.drools.rule.JavaDialectRuntimeData$PackageClassLoader.fastFindClass(JavaDialectRuntimeData.java:615) [drools-core-5.4.0.Final.jar:5.4.0.Final]* *at org.drools.util.CompositeClassLoader$CachingLoader.load(CompositeClassLoader.java:254) [knowledge-api-5.4.0.Final.jar:5.4.0.Final]* *at org.drools.util.CompositeClassLoader$CachingLoader.load(CompositeClassLoader.java:237) [knowledge-api-5.4.0.Final.jar:5.4.0.Final]* *at org.drools.util.CompositeClassLoader.loadClass(CompositeClassLoader.java:88) [knowledge-api-5.4.0.Final.jar:5.4.0.Final]* *at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:295) [rt.jar:1.6.0_30]* *at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:247) [rt.jar:1.6.0_30]* *at a.b.c.Rule_person___unique___name_656ee3db19d34e689d95e2d6b2be67b6Eval0InvokerGenerated.evaluate(Unknown Source)* *at a.b.c.Rule_person___unique___name_656ee3db19d34e689d95e2d6b2be67b6Eval0Invoker.evaluate(Unknown Source)* *at org.drools.rule.EvalCondition.isAllowed(EvalCondition.java:114) [drools-core-5.4.0.Final.jar:5.4.0.Final]* And each time I ran the project I am getting same error but on different rules. Could you please help me out how to solve this issue? with regards, k.chaitanya. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Concurrent stateful knowledge session
Hi I have one question and one problem. The question is, is multiple instances of stateful session, thread safe? The problem is, we have a bunch of test cases. Each test class extends from an abstract class in which drools session will be created. Previously we had stateless session so therefore for each test method we had to create a new session and call execute() method. Now because of the huge number of test methods this runs for about 20 minutes. So we decided to change the the session to stateful to make it faster. After this change, many of test cases have ended with assertion failure which doesn't make sense. I don't know what's wrong here, before each test method, we retract any previous fact and we insert new objects. Since jnuit runs tests in multiple threads I thought maybe there is an issue with concurrency. Can anyone please help me on this. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Concurrent-stateful-knowledge-session-tp4022702.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Fw: Fw: constraints lacking and in excess
Anyone having an idea?
Thanks
Michiel
-
http://www.codessentials.com - Your essential software, for
free!
Follow us at http://twitter.com/#!/Codessentials
- Forwarded Message -
From: Michiel Vermandel mverm...@yahoo.com
To: Rules lists.jboss.org rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 8:54 PM
Subject: [rules-users] constraints lacking and in excess
Hi,
I have written a custom move implementation.
At first I got the exception:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: The moveClass (class
my.planner.solver.MoveGroupToPeriod)'s move (PROJECT Period GroupChange:{T=
Inspect 55871.I#0 [4-4] Bart DE BIE IV XI} = (P5) [i1]) probably has a
corrupted undoMove (my.planner.solver.util.TaskChangeListMove@35e8df37). Or
maybe there are corrupted score rules.
...
I found out that I did not undo all changes that I made in the move.
After fixing this, I now often get Score corruption as below.
I checked and all changes are preceded with director.beforeVariableChanged(...)
and followed by director.afterVariableChanged(...);
What could cause this corruption?
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Score corruption: the workingScore
(-286hard/-30601soft) is not the uncorruptedScore (-286hard/-30401soft):
The workingMemory has 3 ConstraintOccurrence(s) in excess:
preferedRegion/NEGATIVE_SOFT:[{T= Inspect 115519.I#0 [8-8] Dirk JANSSENS
IV V}, Johan LAMOTE, 99, V]=99
taskSpreading/NEGATIVE_HARD:[(P7) , 77]=100
preferedRegion/NEGATIVE_SOFT:[{T= Inspect 115519.I#1 [8-8] Erik VERHOEVEN
TL V}, Dirk JANSSENS, 99, V]=99
The workingMemory has 6 ConstraintOccurrence(s) lacking:
preferedRegion/NEGATIVE_SOFT:[{T= Inspect 115519.I#0 [8-8] Dirk JANSSENS
IV V}, Dirk JANSSENS, 99, V]=99
taskSpreading/NEGATIVE_HARD:[(P7) , 75]=36
preferedRegion/NEGATIVE_SOFT:[{T= Inspect 115519.I#1
[8-8]
Erik VERHOEVEN TL V}, Erik VERHOEVEN, 99, V]=99
preferedRegion/NEGATIVE_SOFT:[{T= Inspect 4747.I#0 [10-10] Johan LAMOTE IV
V}, Johan LAMOTE, 99, V]=99
taskSpreading/NEGATIVE_HARD:[(P8) , 74]=16
preferedRegion/NEGATIVE_SOFT:[{T= Inspect 4747.I#1 [10-10] Dirk JANSSENS
TL V}, Dirk JANSSENS, 99, V]=99
Check the score rules who created those ConstraintOccurrences. Verify that
each ConstraintOccurrence's causes and weight is correct.
at
org.drools.planner.core.score.director.AbstractScoreDirector.assertWorkingScore(AbstractScoreDirector.java:249)
at
org.drools.planner.core.solver.scope.DefaultSolverScope.assertWorkingScore(DefaultSolverScope.java:96)
at
org.drools.planner.core.phase.AbstractSolverPhaseScope.assertWorkingScore(AbstractSolverPhaseScope.java:124)
at
org.drools.planner.core.localsearch.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase.solve(DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase.java:86)
at
org.drools.planner.core.solver.DefaultSolver.runSolverPhases(DefaultSolver.java:190)
at
org.drools.planner.core.solver.DefaultSolver.solve(DefaultSolver.java:155)
at my.planner.app.InspectionSchedule.solve(InspectionSchedule.java:275)
at
my.planner.testcore.AbstractPlanningTestClass.solve(AbstractPlanningTestClass.java:444)
at
my.planner.testcore.AbstractPlanningTestClass.solve(AbstractPlanningTestClass.java:469)
at my.planner.RealBaoTest.datasetBAO20122013(RealBaoTest.java:226)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
at
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
at
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
at
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runNotIgnored(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:79)
at
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:71)
at
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:49)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:50)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:467)
[rules-users] Invitation to use Google Talk
--- You've been invited by Charles Moulliard to use Google Talk. If you already have a Google account, login to Gmail and accept this chat invitation: http://mail.google.com/mail/b-24e447c28b-cbf64d740a-0ZFldaRm8r596E2OwjQjXBBFTbw To sign up for a Google account and get started with Google Talk, you can visit: http://mail.google.com/mail/a-24e447c28b-cbf64d740a-0ZFldaRm8r596E2OwjQjXBBFTbw?pc=en-rf---a Learn more at: http://www.google.com/intl/en/landing/accounts/ Thanks, The Google Team ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Concurrent stateful knowledge session
See below. On 06/03/2013, ismaximum mnr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I have one question and one problem. The question is, is multiple instances of stateful session, thread safe? The problem is, we have a bunch of test cases. Each test class extends from an abstract class in which drools session will be created. Previously we had stateless session so therefore for each test method we had to create a new session and call execute() method. Now because of the huge number of test methods this runs for about 20 minutes. So we decided to change the the session to stateful to make it faster. After this change, many of test cases have ended with assertion failure which doesn't make sense. I don't know what's wrong here, before each test method, we retract any previous fact and we insert new objects. I'm inclined to say that, given your course of actions, this is very likely to happen unless you have taken great pains to make your rules safe from mutual interactions between transactions - transactions in the sense of one related set of inserts/firings/.../retracts. (I can elaborate on this if necessary.) Since jnuit runs tests in multiple threads I thought maybe there is an issue with concurrency. Yes, but not in the classic sense :-) -W Can anyone please help me on this. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Concurrent-stateful-knowledge-session-tp4022702.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
