Re: [rules-users] Drools 5.4 Jitting Error

2012-12-21 Thread Caillard, Quentin
I haven't explained what was my problem, but indeed it has been solved with
5.5. Thanks :)

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:40 PM, kc7bfi
wrote:

> Has this error been fixed and, if so, in what version of DRools? David
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-4-Jitting-Error-tp3999176p4021283.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ___
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>



-- 
*Quentin CAILLARD*
*Software Engineering*
Email : q...@ariadnext.com
Phone : +33 (0)2 30 960 874
Fax : +33 (0)2 30 960 423

*AriadNEXT SAS*
80 av des Buttes de Coësmes
35700 RENNES - FRANCE
http://www.ariadnext.com
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] Drools 5.4.1-Final Download

2012-09-26 Thread Caillard, Quentin
Drools 5.4.1-Final has not been released yet.

2012/9/26 dxande6 

> There are some updates to Drools in the Drools 5.4.1-Final download that we
> need to resolve some issues with Drools 5.4.0-Final.
>
> Does anyone know where I can download the 5.4.1-Final download?
>
> Thank you.
>
> -Dean
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-4-1-Final-Download-tp4019973.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ___
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] Drools 5.4 Jitting Error

2012-09-06 Thread Caillard, Quentin
Sorry, it is a quite old thread. But i am experiencing some jitting error
with the 5.4.0.Final. If I well understand, the jitting error doesn't stop
or modify the execution of my rules. Am I right? Can i use this version
anyway?

Thanks for your response.

Regards

2012/5/17 Mario Fusco 

> I have reported this issue here:
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3511
> I have also already fixed it and pushed the fix on the master branch.
>
> Working on the fix I also found another workaround: even replacing
> feeKeys[1] with feeKeys[1+0] should work. I don't know if this is better or
> worse than the former one I suggested, since it is a bit more concise but
> probably also less readable.
>
> Thanks again for reporting this,
> Mario
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-4-Jitting-Error-tp3999176p3999537.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ___
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>



--
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] [Solved] Concurrency bug in 5.4.0.Final

2012-07-11 Thread Caillard, Quentin
No problem.
Thanks for the explanations about your roadmap.

Quentin CAILLARD

*Software Engineering*

quentin.caill...@ariadnext.com



2012/7/11 Edson Tirelli 

>
>Unfortunately, we have limited resources to maintain older branches in
> the community. While backporting fixes like this is usually quick (a few
> minutes of work if the source code did no diverge too much), making a full
> release involves usually more than a week of work by multiple members of
> the team. We feel that it is much more productive to use that time towards
> the new release putting it out sooner rather than later.
>
>In any case, users can always build from source themselves if they need
> the fix sooner and this kind of bug is typically found during the
> productization and does not usually affect the product. In the rare
> instances that it does, customers receive patches created by the Red Hat
> product team.
>
>The source is available in github: 
> https://github.com/droolsjbpm<https://github.com/organizations/droolsjbpm> and
> building it is just a few maven commands. You can check the documentation
> for instructions.
>
>Edson
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Caillard, Quentin <
> quentin.caill...@ariadnext.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>> Thanks for the fix.
>>
>> I have read in Mark Proctor's blog that the 5.5 will be released within
>> the next 4-5 months. Is there any release date for the next release in the
>> branch 5.4.x?
>>
>> 2012/7/11 Edson Tirelli 
>>
>>>
>>>   Hi all,
>>>
>>>   Just a heads up, in case you are using the community release
>>> 5.4.0.Final in a multi-threaded application, be aware that we found a quite
>>> serious racing condition bug:
>>>
>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3573
>>>
>>>   The bug is now fixed in 5.4.x branch, so I strongly recommend that you
>>> build from source and use that instead. The bug was also fixed in the
>>> up-stream branch and will be released in 5.5.0.
>>>
>>>   IMPORTANT: if you are a Red Hat subscriber, you don't need to do
>>> anything as the problem did not exist in the product release.
>>>
>>>   Edson
>>>
>>> --
>>>   Edson Tirelli
>>>   JBoss Drools Core Development
>>>   JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
>>>
>>> ___
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Quentin CAILLARD
>>
>> *Software Engineering*
>>
>> quentin.caill...@ariadnext.com
>>
>>
>> ___
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>   Edson Tirelli
>   JBoss Drools Core Development
>   JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
>
> ___
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] [Solved] Concurrency bug in 5.4.0.Final

2012-07-11 Thread Caillard, Quentin
Hi.
Thanks for the fix.

I have read in Mark Proctor's blog that the 5.5 will be released within the
next 4-5 months. Is there any release date for the next release in the
branch 5.4.x?

2012/7/11 Edson Tirelli 

>
>   Hi all,
>
>   Just a heads up, in case you are using the community release 5.4.0.Final
> in a multi-threaded application, be aware that we found a quite serious
> racing condition bug:
>
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3573
>
>   The bug is now fixed in 5.4.x branch, so I strongly recommend that you
> build from source and use that instead. The bug was also fixed in the
> up-stream branch and will be released in 5.5.0.
>
>   IMPORTANT: if you are a Red Hat subscriber, you don't need to do
> anything as the problem did not exist in the product release.
>
>   Edson
>
> --
>   Edson Tirelli
>   JBoss Drools Core Development
>   JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
>
> ___
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>


-- 

Quentin CAILLARD

*Software Engineering*

quentin.caill...@ariadnext.com
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] convert drl file to rf?

2012-07-03 Thread Caillard, Quentin
When i right click on the .rf file i have the option Convert to BPMN2
process.

2012/7/2 al so 

> I have both drools and jBPM plugin installed. Where do you do that right
> click? Anything that is intuitive won't work in eclipse. I did the right
> click on drl file and didn't see any such options.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Caillard, Quentin <
> quentin.caill...@ariadnext.com> wrote:
>
>> The ruleflow file(.rf) is deprecated. You can convert your old ruleflow
>> (.rf) to jbpm(.bpmn) file. I did it by using the Drools plugin for Eclipse.
>> If you have the plugin, a simple right click should work.
>>
>>
>> 2012/6/29 abhinay_agarwal 
>>
>>> in the newer version of drools we cannot create a ruleflow file..we can
>>> only
>>> create a jbpm process file
>>>
>>> are ruleflow file(.rf) and jbpm(.bpmn) related ??
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-convert-drl-file-to-rf-tp4018344p4018352.html
>>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> ___
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> ___
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
> ___
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] convert drl file to rf?

2012-06-29 Thread Caillard, Quentin
The ruleflow file(.rf) is deprecated. You can convert your old ruleflow
(.rf) to jbpm(.bpmn) file. I did it by using the Drools plugin for Eclipse.
If you have the plugin, a simple right click should work.

2012/6/29 abhinay_agarwal 

> in the newer version of drools we cannot create a ruleflow file..we can
> only
> create a jbpm process file
>
> are ruleflow file(.rf) and jbpm(.bpmn) related ??
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-convert-drl-file-to-rf-tp4018344p4018352.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ___
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>



-- 

[image: Description : long_bleu_fdblanc2]

Quentin CAILLARD

*Software Engineering
*

* *

quentin.caill...@ariadnext.com

Phone : +33 (0)2 30 960 874

* *

*AriadNEXT *

80 av des Buttes de Coësmes

35700 RENNES - FRANCE
Fax : +33 (0)2 30 960 423
<>___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] convert drl file to rf?

2012-06-29 Thread Caillard, Quentin
I may be wrong, but i think that drl files and jpbm are not used to achieve
the same goal. Drl files to create rules and jpbm to create flows. Then i
think that converting a drl file to a jbpm file makes no sense.

2012/6/29 al so 

> or jBPM file from drl file???
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:50 PM, al so  wrote:
>
>> Can one convert an existing drl file to a rule flow file in eclipse?
>>
>>>
>>
>
> ___
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>


-- 

[image: Description : long_bleu_fdblanc2]

Quentin CAILLARD

*Software Engineering
*
<>___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users