Re: [rules-users] Test Scenarios with Rule Flows in 5.1.1 Guvnor
I know you said this is only part of the audit log but I don't see any facts inserted or rules being activated. The fact insertion statements should appear before the StartProcess rule is activated. Can you paste the entire audit log for running the test scenario? On Mar 30, 2011, at 11:42 PM, kylin8627live wrote: Hi Jeff, I met the same problem. I added the rule you mention to Guvnor and it is able to triggered nodes in my ruleflow. However, still no rules were fired. I guess rules are not assigned to ruleflow-groups because it mentions [size=0]. In rules I set up ruleflow-group properties and they work fine in Eclipse. Am I missing something? Following is a part of audit log FIRING rule: [StartProcess] activationId:StartProcess [0] declarations: BEFORE RULEFLOW STARTED process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:Start[id=1] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:CorrectInitQuestion[id=2] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:CorrectInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:CorrectInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:CorrectInitQuestion[id=2] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] AFTER RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:Start[id=1] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] AFTER RULEFLOW STARTED process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:CorrectInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:CorrectInitQuestion[size=0] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:WrongInitQuestion[id=14] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:WrongInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:WrongInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:WrongInitQuestion[id=14] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:WrongInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:WrongInitQuestion[size=0] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] Does null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] indicate anything? Really appreciated if someone can provide some helps. Best, Weilin -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Test-Scenarios-with-Rule-Flows-in-5-1-1-Guvnor-tp2754820p2757301.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Test Scenarios with Rule Flows in 5.1.1 Guvnor
Add a rule with a higher salience that starts the rule flow process rule StartProcess salience 100 when #conditions then #actions kcontext.getKnowledgeRuntime().startProcess(processname); end And add it to your package. Activate is for test scenarios that test individual rules that are part of a ruleflow group. For example, you want to test your second rule independent of the rule flow process, then activate RuleFlowGroup2 (and provide a set of facts that cause the rule in RuleFlowGroup2 to execute). Jeff On Mar 30, 2011, at 11:53 AM, John Peterson wrote: Hi all, I had (hopefully) a quick question about trying to test rules in rule flows in Guvnor with Drools 5.1.1. I have a simple 4 step rule flow (Start-RuleGroup1-RuleGroup2-End) with 1 rule in each Rule group. When I set up the test scenario to fire the first rule, which will trigger the second rule, activate “RuleGroup1”, and run the scenario, it doesn’t trigger the RuleFlow and fire the rule. I’ve also tried activating “Start” instead, but neither of them trigger the RuleFlow. I know from experience that Rule Flows don’t seem to work with 5.0, but with the addition of the entry options, I thought they would with 5.1.1. Am I mistaken? Also, when I look at the Audit Log, I see the Rule Flow activated and deactivated before any of the facts are asserted: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 1.jpg BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:Start[size=0] Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 2.jpg AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:Start[size=0] Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 3.jpg BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:Start[size=0] Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 4.jpg AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:Start[size=0] Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 5.jpg OBJECT ASSERTED value:com.test.Game@47244724 factId: 1 Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 6.jpg OBJECT ASSERTED value:com.test.Customer@4c584c58 factId: 2 Could this be part of the problem? Thanks! ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Drools flow and BPEL (Drools 5.1)
Actually there is another community project in JBoss, Riftsaw, that incorporates ODE into a JBoss AS environment. It is hard to say which process execution language best matches your requirements. That would depend on the degree of Web service orchestration in your architecture. If your business processes are 100% composed of Web services, then BPEL is probably the best process execution language, and you should take a look at Riftsaw. If your processes involve a lot of human integration or tight integration with rules, then BPMN2 process execution language and Drools Flow is the better way to go. Jeff On Sep 16, 2010, at 8:50 AM, Mark Proctor wrote: On 16/09/2010 03:29, tim wrote: Do you mean that there isn't embedded BPEL (i.e Apache ODE) in Drools 5.1？If that's true, I'll have to find other ways to support BPEL in our product. I find there is a guvnor-BPEL-editor component in Drools 5.1.1 source code. Are you planning to provide a BPEL editor in Guvnor? And in which release? We have no plans at the moment to embed BPEL into Drools. BPMN2 is far supperior to BPEL and that is were our focus is. Mark Thanks! ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Ruleflows
Why not try the second strategy you listed below: - (Insert one debt, start the ruleflow process) for each debt Since each debt is separate. As for only firing one rule in the ruleflow group, try using the same activation-group attribute on each rule in the ruleflow group. Activation groups cause only a single rule in the same group to be activated. Jeff Jonathan Guéhenneux wrote: I just constated its true. sadly (for me). How can I do to make that only one rule per ruleflow group can be activated with one specific tuple? I think that I can add an attribute in my business object, like boolean gravityComputed in order to activate only one time a gravity compute rule but thats not very clean. Is there any drools action to break the deactivate the current flow and activate the next one? and if yes, is it possible to call it from a rule? Subject: RE: [rules-users] Ruleflows Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:45:51 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org IMO, the first. Another answer; I believe RuleFlow controls the activation sequence so IMO yes. Kris, care to correct me? *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Guéhenneux *Sent:* 10 April 2008 11:36 *To:* Rules Users List *Subject:* [rules-users] Ruleflows Hi, I have to compute the gravity of a debt according to a set of rules organized in a ruleflow. I will have to process about ten thousands debts every minute. There is no dependency between the debts. All the rules are applied to one debt. What is the best strategy? - Insert all the debts, and start the ruleflow process or - (Insert one debt, start the ruleflow process) for each debt Another question: If a rule r1 in the ruleflow group rfg1 is fired on a debt d1, can a second rule r2 in the same ruleflow group be fired on the same debt d1? Discutez gratuitement avec vos amis en vidéo ! Téléchargez Messenger, c'est gratuit ! http://www.windowslive.fr/messenger/ Plus de 15 millions de français utilisent Windows Live Messenger ! Téléchargez Messenger, c'est gratuit ! http://www.windowslive.fr/messenger/ ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Closing connections with BRMS\JackRabbit Repository
Why use an XA datasource? It would not seem that the BRMS would be
involved in global transactions with multiple participants. Perhaps you
could try a local tx datasource and see if you still get the warning.
The exception is logged at INFO; typically it is not a problem, since
the app server will close the connection. I seem to remember there is
even a setting on the datasource to suppress the warning message. Not
sure why execution would stop for 4-5 seconds though.
mmquelo massi wrote:
Hi guys!
I have got JBoss 4.2.2, DROOLS BRMS 4.0.4 and Oracle 10g XE as RDBMS.
I defined an Oracle XA Datasource Drools Repository as follows:
/xa-datasource
jndi-namejdbc_XA/Drools_Rep/jndi-name
track-connection-by-tx/
isSameRM-override-valuefalse/isSameRM-override-value
xa-datasource-classoracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXADataSource/xa-datasource-class
xa-datasource-property
name=URLjdbc:oracle:thin:@//localhost:1521/xe/xa-datasource-property
xa-datasource-property name=User.../xa-datasource-property
xa-datasource-property name=Password.../xa-datasource-property
exception-sorter-class-nameorg.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.vendor.OracleExceptionSorter/exception-sorter-class-name
!--
prepared-statement-cache-size0/prepared-statement-cache-size --
!-- blocking-timeout-millis100/blocking-timeout-millis --
!-- min-pool-size2/min-pool-size --
!-- max-pool-size30/max-pool-size --/
/
valid-connection-checker-class-nameorg.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.vendor.OracleValidConnectionChecker/valid-connection-checker-class-name/
/no-tx-separate-pools/
metadata
type-mappingOracle9i/type-mapping
/metadata
use-java-contextfalse/use-java-context
/xa-datasource/
This repository is managed with JackRabbit.
So i defined the repository.xml telling jackrabbit that I want
to persist the rules into the Oracle XA Datasource I previously defined:
/PersistenceManager
class=org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.db.JNDIDatabasePersistenceManager
param name=dataSourceLocation value=jdbc_XA/Drools_Rep/
param name=schema value=oracle/
param name=schemaObjectPrefix value=${wsp.name
http://wsp.name}_/
param name=externalBLOBs value=false /
/PersistenceManager/
The problem comes out each time I reload the rulebase from
the BRMSeach time the RuleAgent wants to load
a rulebase (from the XA datasource ) the following exception is
thrown and the execution stops for 4-5 seconds:
/12:29:36,170 INFO [CachedConnectionManager] Closing a connection for
you. Please close them yourself:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
/java.lang.Throwable: STACKTRACE/
/at
org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.CachedConnectionManager.registerConnection(/
/CachedConnectionManager.java:290/ /)/
/at
org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.BaseConnectionManager2.allocateConnection(/
/BaseConnectionManager2.java:417/ /)/
/at
org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.BaseConnectionManager2$ConnectionManagerProxy.allocateConnection(/
/BaseConnectionManager2.java:842/ /)/
/at org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.WrapperDataSource.getConnection(/
/WrapperDataSource.java:88/ /)/
/at
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.db.JNDIDatabasePersistenceManager.getConnection(/
/JNDIDatabasePersistenceManager.java:77/ /)/
/at
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.db.DatabasePersistenceManager.initConnection(/
/DatabasePersistenceManager.java:730/ /)/
/at
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.db.DatabasePersistenceManager.reestablishConnection(/
/DatabasePersistenceManager.java:806/ /)/
/at
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.db.DatabasePersistenceManager.executeStmt(/
/DatabasePersistenceManager.java:852/ /)/
/at
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.db.DatabasePersistenceManager.exists(/
/DatabasePersistenceManager.java:673/ /)/
/at
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.state.SharedItemStateManager.hasNonVirtualItemState(/
/SharedItemStateManager.java:1104/ /)/
/at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.state.SharedItemStateManager.hasItemState(/
/SharedItemStateManager.java:289/ /)/
/at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.state.LocalItemStateManager.hasItemState(/
/LocalItemStateManager.java:180/ /)/
/at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.state.XAItemStateManager.hasItemState(/
/XAItemStateManager.java:252/ /)/
/at
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.state.SessionItemStateManager.hasItemState(/
/SessionItemStateManager.java:199/ /)/
/at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.ItemManager.itemExists(/
/ItemManager.java:258/ /)/
/at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.NodeImpl.hasProperty(/
/NodeImpl.java:2708/ /)/
/at org.drools.repository.PackageItem.getCompiledPackageBytes(/
/PackageItem.java:666/ /)/
/at org.drools.brms.server.files.FileManagerUtils.loadBinaryPackage(/
/FileManagerUtils.java:146/ /)/
/at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(/
/Native Method/ /)/
/at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)/
/at
Re: [rules-users] If one exists check all
I think what you are looking for is the forall. The forall Conditional Element will evaluate to true when all facts that match the first pattern match all the remaining patterns. E.g.,, rule No fields can be blank when forall ($i : Insurance( name != null || street != null || city != null || county != null || state != null || country != null || zip != null) Insurance(this == $i, name == null || street == null || city == null || county == null || state == null || country == null || zip == null) ) then Report error end Brian Enderle wrote: I have a test case that says that if any one field is present then all must be present and then verified. The items in question are for an Insurance object and are Name, Street, City, County, State, Country and Zip. If one of the these 7 fields is present (not null/blank) then it and all the other fields need to be verified. This needs to be done on a per object basis as not all InsuranceCarrier objects will have these fields filled in. Just to clarify I need rules for each field similar to the following: rule Name cannot be blank when $i : Insurance( name == null, street != null || city != null || county != null || state != null || country != null || zip != null) then Report error end Ithere a simple way to check all the values and then execute all the rules for that object? THanks in advance, Brian Enderle ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Ruleflow and Global - precision
Did you put a global declaration in the XOR Split Constraint Editor (same spot to put imports)? vdelbart wrote: Just an additionnal information of my problem : this two sentences work in a rule with the declaration of my global (Global HashMap map) : Boolean(eval((Boolean)map.get(decision) == true)) from Boolean.TRUE; Boolean(booleanValue == false) from map.get(decision) thanks, ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
