Re: [rules-users] Drools 5.5.0 - Execution Performance

2013-11-28 Thread ch3xy
I used same session for insertion and retracted facts after each cycle. But
nothing changes in execution time when creating a new session each cycle.

I made a last test with 300 totally different facts and it showed that the
rule engine somehow learns and asserts faster if a similar object is
inserted ...

Anyway, I think my problem is solved for now. Thank you for sour support



--
View this message in context: 
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-5-0-Execution-Performance-tp4026936p4026989.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] Drools 5.5.0 - Execution Performance

2013-11-26 Thread ch3xy
Thanks for your fast reply ...

I did not retract the facts after each cycle, I inserted the facts within
the loop and fired rules afterwards ... but i repeated the test with fireing
rules and retract facts for each cycle - the effect is the same ... the
elapsed time is nearly the same (about 2 sec for 600 facts) and it gets
faster after the first loop cycle

Working memory was in Identity mode (which is default) but I also tried with
equality ... same result
I changed mode this way:

RuleBaseConfiguration ruleBaseConfiguration = new RuleBaseConfiguration();
ruleBaseConfiguration.setAssertBehaviour(RuleBaseConfiguration.AssertBehaviour.IDENTITY);

should be correct or am i wrong?

BatchExecution resulted in about 2 sec total time as well ... so it seems
there is no difference ...


It would be great if the rule engine somehow learns over time and assertion
gets faster but I am still not sure whether this is because asserting same
instances of facts



--
View this message in context: 
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-5-0-Execution-Performance-tp4026936p4026942.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


[rules-users] Drools 5.5.0 - Execution Performance

2013-11-25 Thread ch3xy
Hello, 

first of all I'd like to mention that i am pretty new to Drools, so please
be patient :-) 
We are using Drools 5.5.0. we have a knowledgeBase of about 500 rules and a
pretty complex object structure. So far everything is working fine … at the
moment we are testing the performance of the engine and we encountered a
quite strange  thing. We generated about 10 objects, inserted it into the
session and measured time needed for execution of rules. To simulate a high
number of facts, we inserted the same objects over and over again (100x,
1000x, 1x). When the first objects were inserted, the time of execution
was about 100ms but for each iteration the execution got faster and faster
(20ms, 10ms and later on even 1ms) .. 

Now my question: Are the objects somehow cached in the working memory, so
that execution gets faster or does this increase of performance has an other
reason? I read a few things about shadow facts which are not present anymore
since Drools 5 and sync and async Rete and I think this could be a potential
answer for my question, but I am not able to understand this completely. For
me it is important to know whether the increase of performance is only due
to the fact that we are inserting the same facts over and over again or if a
significant increase of performance is still possible if facts are not
identical? 

Can someone help me? 

Thanks in advance




--
View this message in context: 
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-5-0-Execution-Performance-tp4026936.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users