Re: [rules-users] Contains an object
On 26/04/2012, gboro54 wrote: > Is there a way to use contains with an object? i.e Yes, but've got to follow Java's sytax rules (apart from using additional operators). > > obj:Object(collection contains SubObject(string="TST",int=1)) > The second operand isn't a valid Java expression. Rather than being forced to use "from", consider inserting SubObjects as facts. $subobj: SubObject(string="TST",int=1) obj:Object(collection contains $subobj) > > I know you could do a from but we are writing a DSL and it would be great > if > I could accomplish something like this above But using "from" can be accomplished with a DSL phrase as well. -W > > TIA! > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Contains-an-object-tp3941334p3941334.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ___ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Contains an object
Yes I know that from can be used with DSL. I was just trying to think of a way to do something with a sub part of the object(i.e a dsl entry with a - ) laune wrote > > On 26/04/2012, gboro54wrote: >> Is there a way to use contains with an object? i.e > > Yes, but've got to follow Java's sytax rules (apart from using > additional operators). > > >> >> obj:Object(collection contains SubObject(string="TST",int=1)) >> > > The second operand isn't a valid Java expression. > > Rather than being forced to use "from", consider inserting SubObjects as > facts. > >$subobj: SubObject(string="TST",int=1) >obj:Object(collection contains $subobj) > >> >> I know you could do a from but we are writing a DSL and it would be great >> if >> I could accomplish something like this above > > But using "from" can be accomplished with a DSL phrase as well. > > -W > >> >> TIA! >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Contains-an-object-tp3941334p3941334.html >> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> ___ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users@.jboss >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > ___ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@.jboss > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Contains-an-object-tp3941334p3941387.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Contains an object
I guess I could also have a method on my main object that takes parameters and just do a not null check... gboro54 wrote > > Is there a way to use contains with an object? i.e > > obj:Object(collection contains SubObject(string="TST",int=1)) > > > I know you could do a from but we are writing a DSL and it would be great > if I could accomplish something like this above > > TIA! > -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Contains-an-object-tp3941334p3941343.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Contains an object
Is there a way to use contains with an object? i.e obj:Object(collection contains SubObject(string="TST",int=1)) I know you could do a from but we are writing a DSL and it would be great if I could accomplish something like this above TIA! -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Contains-an-object-tp3941334p3941334.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users