Re: [rules-users] Loading rules performance problem in 5.4.0.Beta2 compare to 5.0.1
Appreciate for the useful info, Mark. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Loading-rules-performance-problem-in-5-4-0-Beta2-compare-to-5-0-1-tp3768609p3777289.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Loading rules performance problem in 5.4.0.Beta2 compare to 5.0.1
On 23/02/2012 03:29, erolagnab wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm planning to upgrade to Drools 5.4.0.Beta2 from 5.0.1. > However when testing the performance w.r.t rules loading, 5.4.0.Beta2 is not > only much slower (50% slower) but also eats more memory compare to 5.0.1. > > Is it something expected from 5.4.0.Beta2 to compensate other > fixes/features? 5.4 has a significantly more power which makes the build process more complex and thus slower. However we've never actually profiled the build process to attempt to improve it's performance or reduce memory. We won't get around to improving those for 5.4, but we will address it as some point in the future, I know that Mario is itching to get parallel rule building :) As always code contributions are welcome :) Mark > > Thanks, > > Trung > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Loading-rules-performance-problem-in-5-4-0-Beta2-compare-to-5-0-1-tp3768609p3768609.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ___ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Loading rules performance problem in 5.4.0.Beta2 compare to 5.0.1
Hi all, I'm planning to upgrade to Drools 5.4.0.Beta2 from 5.0.1. However when testing the performance w.r.t rules loading, 5.4.0.Beta2 is not only much slower (50% slower) but also eats more memory compare to 5.0.1. Is it something expected from 5.4.0.Beta2 to compensate other fixes/features? Thanks, Trung -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Loading-rules-performance-problem-in-5-4-0-Beta2-compare-to-5-0-1-tp3768609p3768609.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
