So my question is, how can I say to the split node to consider the fact
outgoing from the ruleFlowGroup1 and not a fact in the working memory
In one of the future releases, we will add support for ruleflow 'variables'
that can temporarly store some value so that it can be used by other rules
or inside constraints (like a split in your example). For now you can
simulate this by either using some dedicated Fact in your working memory or
a global that can store this value.
Kris
- Original Message -
From: hypnosat7 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 10:18 AM
Subject: [rules-users] problems using rule flow
When I use my rule flow with only one asserted fact it work very well, but
when I assert more than one fact it goes wrong. I used the Audit View to
fix
the problem.
My rule flow : Start - ruleFlowGroup1 - split - ruleFlowGroup2
- join
When I edit my split node I have this :
To node ruleFlowGroup2 : constraint
To node join : constraint
For the node join constraint I specified something like :
myFact(state==myFact.state1)
And when a fact with state==myFact.state1 is inserted the split node
constraint are true for the others facts even if their states are
different
from myFact.state.
I'm also updating my fact in all the rules.
So my question is, how can I say to the split node to consider the fact
outgoing from the ruleFlowGroup1 and not a fact in the working memory
Thanks
Any help pls ?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/problems-using-rule-flow-tf4128169.html#a11739566
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
