RE: [rules-users] top n - accumulate function parameters

[Evans, Jess]

The MVEL trick works.  That was exactly what I was hoping to find.
 
thanks,
 
-Jess



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edson Tirelli
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 3:40 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] top n - accumulate function parameters



   Accumulate functions support only a single parameter, as they are
defined now, but would be great if someone can come up with a good way
of adding support to variable number of parameters.

   Having said that, you can probably try a quick trick for your rules.
The way accumulate function works now is that it takes an expression as
the parameter, evaluate the expression and sends the result of the
expression to the accumulate function implementation. Example:

... accumulate( Cheese( $price: price ),
   sum( $price * 10 ) )

   So the engine will calculate $price * 10 and will send the result
into the function implementation.
   So, if you are using MVEL dialect, you can use the list creation
simplified syntax to pass multiple parameters to the function. I never
tried, but should work:

rule xyz
dialect "mvel"
when
...
... accumlate( Cheese( $price : price ),
 averageTop( [10, $price ] ) )
then
  ...
end

The syntax [ ] will create a list in MVEL and will pass it into the
method call:

public void accumulate(Serializable context, Object value) {
  List values = (List) value;
  ...
 }

 Problem is you only have the parameters available in the
accumulate() and reverse() call... you don't have access to them in the
init() and result() call.

 If you want to improve this, you are more than welcome!

[]s
Edson

 


2008/11/11 Evans, Jess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


I'm trying to average top N items.  I can of course collect the
items and do the rest in the consequence, but thought it might be a
scenario applicable to a custom accumulate function.  However, the
accumulate function interface methods only take one parameter.  If I
were to declare a function top(N, things) within an accumulate call
would drools autobox the parameters into some sort of collection?  
 
Maybe this is a naive solution anyway.  I am still learning to
think declaratively.
 
 
cheers,
 

-Jess

___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users






-- 
 Edson Tirelli
 JBoss Drools Core Development
 JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com

___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Re: [rules-users] top n - accumulate function parameters

[Edson Tirelli]

   Accumulate functions support only a single parameter, as they are defined
now, but would be great if someone can come up with a good way of adding
support to variable number of parameters.

   Having said that, you can probably try a quick trick for your rules. The
way accumulate function works now is that it takes an expression as the
parameter, evaluate the expression and sends the result of the expression to
the accumulate function implementation. Example:

... accumulate( Cheese( $price: price ),
   sum( $price * 10 ) )

   So the engine will calculate $price * 10 and will send the result into
the function implementation.
   So, if you are using MVEL dialect, you can use the list creation
simplified syntax to pass multiple parameters to the function. I never
tried, but should work:

rule xyz
dialect "mvel"
when
...
... accumlate( Cheese( $price : price ),
 averageTop( [10, $price ] ) )
then
  ...
end

The syntax [ ] will create a list in MVEL and will pass it into the
method call:

public void accumulate(Serializable context, Object value) {
  List values = (List) value;
  ...
 }

 Problem is you only have the parameters available in the accumulate()
and reverse() call... you don't have access to them in the init() and
result() call.

 If you want to improve this, you are more than welcome!

[]s
Edson



2008/11/11 Evans, Jess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>  I'm trying to average top N items.  I can of course collect the items and
> do the rest in the consequence, but thought it might be a scenario
> applicable to a custom accumulate function.  However, the accumulate
> function interface methods only take one parameter.  If I were to declare a
> function top(N, things) within an accumulate call would drools autobox the
> parameters into some sort of collection?
>
> Maybe this is a naive solution anyway.  I am still learning to think
> declaratively.
>
>
> cheers,
>
> -Jess
>
> ___
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>


-- 
 Edson Tirelli
 JBoss Drools Core Development
 JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users