Steffen Nurpmeso <stef...@sdaoden.eu> wrote: > Hello Giannis. > > I have to apply some corrections to my claim, sorry. > > Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in > <20200511173946._vy_n%stef...@sdaoden.eu>: > ... > |Also, if i say "? set mailcap-disable" and then > > Actually unnecessary, ~/.mailcap is inspected as a second step. > > | set pipe-application/pdf='@*=mupdf $MAILX_FILENAME_TEMPORARY' > > This should be "?*=++? mupdf $MAILX_FILENAME_TEMPORARY" then. > Important is ? not @ (has been deprecated long ago, hmm), and the > ++ to delete the file backing $MAILX_FILENAME_TEMPORARY, otherwise > your $TMPDIR will fill. > > Or just use an according entry in ~/.mailcap. > What could really make sense is an environment variable that is > passed to ~/.mailcap tests, so that those know the actual command > (i.e., mimeview or print). Hmm. > > |mupdf(1) will be spawned even for "print". > > Ciao, and greetings to Greece! > > --steffen > | > |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, > |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one > |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off > |(By Robert Gernhardt)
Gutten morgen Steffen. Your clarifications are really useful, thank you. 2 more clarifications, please.. Even, if i say "? set mailcap-disable", is there an inspection for the ~/.mailcap ? The $TMPDIR will be empty after each boot or am i wrong? So if it will not be empty after boot then the addition ++ will be useful. Regards :) Giannis.
