Indeed, it is not only great to see that Sage is increasing in the number
of citations* but also the total number of papers citing mathematics
software.
Best,
Travis
* In algebraic combinatorics, I sometimes notice that people give an
acknowledgement that they have used Sage to help with their paper without
actually citing Sage. This makes it harder for simple data mining tools to
pick up I think. I also know of some papers that have used Sage to
construct examples without even an acknowledgement... So there work to do
on making sure the broader math community does properly cite (or at least
acknowledge) the use of a CAS. (As I say this, I think I forgot to cite
Mathematica in one of my papers that one of my coauthors used somewhat
extensively...)
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 2:44:10 PM UTC+9 kcrisman wrote:
> I take this opportunity to thank the Sage community and the developers of
>> related softwares integrated for this Huge effort and to let you know of
>> the positive comments that I receive form the research community in MSC-52.
>> THANK YOU SO MUCH!
>>
>> If you are interested in a deeper analysis, I produced detailed graphics
>> and provide the raw data in a Jupyter notebook on my webpage:
>>
>> https://jplab.github.io/sage_cite.html
>
>
> Great post!
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/dc80e2fa-a1d8-4fc4-832f-82746b8193d8n%40googlegroups.com.
