[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!
Craig Citro wrote: Hi Jaap, I went ahead and fixed (I hope!) the doctest below. (I just added a prec flag, and made the doctests use it, so this should avoid any sort of architecture-dependent issues). Could you try this out and let me know if it works, and then give the patch a positive review? Thanks! If anyone else is seeing this doctest failure, could you also try it out? (I don't see it on my machine, so I'm guessing this works, but I can't be sure.) Patch is here: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2201 Hi Craig, I couldn't apply this patch for some reason I don't understand! abort: outstanding uncommitted changes Jaap --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!
Craig Citro wrote: As follow up: If anyone else is seeing this doctest failure, could you also try it out? (I don't see it on my machine, so I'm guessing this works, but I can't be sure.) Patch is here: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2201 I applied the patch by hand. And got: copying build/lib.linux-i686-2.5/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py - /home/jaap/downloads/sage-2.10.2.alpha0/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage/rings/number_field byte-compiling /home/jaap/downloads/sage-2.10.2.alpha0/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py to number_field.pyc running install_scripts changing mode of /home/jaap/downloads/sage-2.10.2.alpha0/local/bin/dsage_server.py to 775 changing mode of /home/jaap/downloads/sage-2.10.2.alpha0/local/bin/dsage_worker.py to 775 changing mode of /home/jaap/downloads/sage-2.10.2.alpha0/local/bin/dsage_setup.py to 775 running install_data running install_egg_info Removing /home/jaap/downloads/sage-2.10.2.alpha0/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage-0.0.0-py2.5.egg-info Writing /home/jaap/downloads/sage-2.10.2.alpha0/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage-0.0.0-py2.5.egg-info -- | SAGE Version 2.10.2.alpha0, Release Date: 2008-02-14 | | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.| -- sage: Exiting SAGE (CPU time 0m0.00s, Wall time 0m14.94s). [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.10.2.alpha0]$ ./sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py [21.3 s] -- All tests passed! Total time for all tests: 21.3 seconds I'll give the trac a positive review. Jaap --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!
Hi, all, On Feb 14, 2008, at 22:41 , mabshoff wrote: here is the first alpha0 for 2.10.2. It has been greatly delayed by SD7 and then at least on my end by the cold I brought home from it that put me out of commission for two days. The big changes in this release are * Debianization of the build system * unramified and eisenstein extensions * code for enumerating totally real fields The tarball [206MB] is available at the usual place: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-2.10.2/ sage-2.10.2.alpha0.tar The build fails on my Mac OS X system [10.4.11, Dual Quad Xeon]. The last part of the install log is appended. The full (7MB!!) install log is in sage.math.washington.edu:logs/2.10.2.alpha0.log. I built it with -j6. I'm trying it now without parallelism, but in the meantime, any thoughts? Justin = *** TOUCHING ALL CYTHON (.pyx) FILES *** scons: `install' is up to date. -- sage: Building and installing modified SAGE library files. Installing c_lib scons: `install' is up to date. Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 1207, in module deps = create_deps(ext_modules) File setup.py, line 1198, in create_deps deps_graph(deps, f, visited) File setup.py, line 1165, in deps_graph this_deps = search_all_includes(f) File setup.py, line 1089, in search_all_includes S = open(filename).readlines() IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'sage-main/sage/modules/ free_module_element.pyx' sage: There was an error installing modified sage library code. ERROR installing SAGE -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds Men are from Earth. Women are from Earth. Deal with it. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!
Hi Jaap, I went ahead and fixed (I hope!) the doctest below. (I just added a prec flag, and made the doctests use it, so this should avoid any sort of architecture-dependent issues). Could you try this out and let me know if it works, and then give the patch a positive review? Thanks! If anyone else is seeing this doctest failure, could you also try it out? (I don't see it on my machine, so I'm guessing this works, but I can't be sure.) Patch is here: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2201 -cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.10.2.alpha0]$ ./sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py** File number_field.py, line 2087: sage: F.reduced_basis() Expected: [1, alpha, alpha^2 - 15*alpha + 1, alpha^3 - 16*alpha^2 + 469*alpha + 267109] Got: [1, alpha, alpha^2 - 15*alpha, alpha^3 - 16*alpha^2 + 469*alpha + 267109] ** 1 items had failures: 1 of 6 in __main__.example_60 ***Test Failed*** 1 failures. For whitespace errors, see the file .doctest_number_field.py [33.8 s] exit code: 256 Jaap --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!
mabshoff wrote: SNIP The patch at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/1963/Sage-2.10.2... fixes the import error. Hi Jaap After applying the patch I got on Fedora 7 32 bits: -- The following tests failed: sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/padics/padic_ZZ_pX_CR_element.pyx sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py Interesting that there is a 32 vs 64 bit issue left in the extension code. The above two doctest failures should be caused by David's patch. [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.10.2.alpha0]$ ./sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py** File number_field.py, line 2087: sage: F.reduced_basis() Expected: [1, alpha, alpha^2 - 15*alpha + 1, alpha^3 - 16*alpha^2 + 469*alpha + 267109] Got: [1, alpha, alpha^2 - 15*alpha, alpha^3 - 16*alpha^2 + 469*alpha + 267109] ** 1 items had failures: 1 of 6 in __main__.example_60 ***Test Failed*** 1 failures. For whitespace errors, see the file .doctest_number_field.py [33.8 s] exit code: 256 Jaap --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!
Craig Citro wrote: sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py Actually, this one could be unexpected numerical noise from the code I added in with John Voight's code. Jaap, could you post this doctest failure, too? Sorry I missed this message. See elsewhere in this thread. Jaap --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!
Hello folks, * unramified and eisenstein extensions We are having some problems with the build from vanilla sources build: [10:11] mhansen-2028 mabshoff: You there? [10:13] mhansen-2028 After building alpha0, I get the following: [10:13] mhansen-2028 type 'exceptions.ImportError': No module named padic_extension_generic_element [10:26] mhansen-2028 wstein-grant: You around? [10:36] wstein-grant hi [10:36] wstein-grant hi mhansen-2028 [10:36] wstein-grant yep, alpha0 fails to work on all machines because of the error mhansen-2028 mentions above. [10:38] mhansen-2028 Lovely :) [10:38] mhansen-2028 We should find the source for that file. So let us know if anybody (David himself?) has the solution. It seems that every time we merge a major patch that adds a lot of code and moves some around has at least one of those import errors. Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!
On Feb 15, 2:03 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de wrote: Hello folks, * unramified and eisenstein extensions We are having some problems with the build from vanilla sources build: [10:11] mhansen-2028 mabshoff: You there? [10:13] mhansen-2028 After building alpha0, I get the following: [10:13] mhansen-2028 type 'exceptions.ImportError': No module named padic_extension_generic_element [10:26] mhansen-2028 wstein-grant: You around? [10:36] wstein-grant hi [10:36] wstein-grant hi mhansen-2028 [10:36] wstein-grant yep, alpha0 fails to work on all machines because of the error mhansen-2028 mentions above. [10:38] mhansen-2028 Lovely :) [10:38] mhansen-2028 We should find the source for that file. So let us know if anybody (David himself?) has the solution. It seems that every time we merge a major patch that adds a lot of code and moves some around has at least one of those import errors. The patch at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/1963/Sage-2.10.2.alpha1-fix-import-issue.patch fixes the import error. Cheers, Michael Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!
mabshoff wrote: On Feb 15, 2:03 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de wrote: Hello folks, * unramified and eisenstein extensions We are having some problems with the build from vanilla sources build: [10:11] mhansen-2028 mabshoff: You there? [10:13] mhansen-2028 After building alpha0, I get the following: [10:13] mhansen-2028 type 'exceptions.ImportError': No module named padic_extension_generic_element [10:26] mhansen-2028 wstein-grant: You around? [10:36] wstein-grant hi [10:36] wstein-grant hi mhansen-2028 [10:36] wstein-grant yep, alpha0 fails to work on all machines because of the error mhansen-2028 mentions above. [10:38] mhansen-2028 Lovely :) [10:38] mhansen-2028 We should find the source for that file. So let us know if anybody (David himself?) has the solution. It seems that every time we merge a major patch that adds a lot of code and moves some around has at least one of those import errors. The patch at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/1963/Sage-2.10.2.alpha1-fix-import-issue.patch fixes the import error. After applying the patch I got on Fedora 7 32 bits: -- The following tests failed: sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/padics/padic_ZZ_pX_CR_element.pyx sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial.pyx sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/misc/functional.py sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/groups/group.pyx sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/combinat/partition_algebra.py Total time for all tests: 2704.2 seconds Please see /home/jaap/downloads/sage-2.10.2.alpha0/tmp/test.log for the complete log from this test. [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.10.2.alpha0]$ Jaap --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!
This is doctest where the result used to be Traceback (most recent call last): ... TypeError: cannot create a p-adic out of class ' sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial_element.MPolynomial_polydict' but after the p-adics patch it started working and returning p. I looked at it briefly and couldn't figure out why it was doing so. David On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mabshoff wrote: SNIP sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial.pyx That is a new one. Could you post the detailed failure? [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.10.2.alpha0]$ ./sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial.pyx sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial.pyx** File multi_polynomial.pyx, line 256: sage: R(S.0) Expected: BROKEN -- FIX ME Got: p ** 1 items had failures: 1 of 14 in __main__.example_4 ***Test Failed*** 1 failures. For whitespace errors, see the file .doctest_multi_polynomial.pyx [2.0 s] exit code: 256 Jaap --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!
On Feb 15, 9:21 pm, David Roe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi David, This is doctest where the result used to be Traceback (most recent call last): ... TypeError: cannot create a p-adic out of class ' sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial_element.MPolynomial_polydict' but after the p-adics patch it started working and returning p. I looked at it briefly and couldn't figure out why it was doing so. I remember now that we discussed that at SD7, so sorry for the noise. David Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!
mabshoff wrote: SNIP sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial.pyx That is a new one. Could you post the detailed failure? [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.10.2.alpha0]$ ./sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial.pyx sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial.pyx** File multi_polynomial.pyx, line 256: sage: R(S.0) Expected: BROKEN -- FIX ME Got: p ** 1 items had failures: 1 of 14 in __main__.example_4 ***Test Failed*** 1 failures. For whitespace errors, see the file .doctest_multi_polynomial.pyx [2.0 s] exit code: 256 Jaap --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!
SNIP The patch at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/1963/Sage-2.10.2... fixes the import error. Hi Jaap After applying the patch I got on Fedora 7 32 bits: -- The following tests failed: sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/padics/padic_ZZ_pX_CR_element.pyx sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py Interesting that there is a 32 vs 64 bit issue left in the extension code. The above two doctest failures should be caused by David's patch. sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial.pyx That is a new one. Could you post the detailed failure? sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/misc/functional.py sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/groups/group.pyx sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/combinat/partition_algebra.py Those also happen on 64 bit. Total time for all tests: 2704.2 seconds Please see /home/jaap/downloads/sage-2.10.2.alpha0/tmp/test.log for the complete log from this test. [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.10.2.alpha0]$ Jaap Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.2.alpha0 released!
If you want to commit to the devel/sage repo you need to drop in the files from http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/missing-debian.tar.gz into SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage. hg status should then show that everything is ok. Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
