Re: [sage-devel] any([magma(True),magma(True)]) produces stack overflow

2022-02-18 Thread Simon Brandhorst
Indeed it was on 9.4. Sorry I forgot to mention that. Thank you.

On Friday, February 18, 2022 at 9:31:06 PM UTC+1 jus...@mac.com wrote:

>
>
> > On Feb 18, 2022, at 12:23 , David Roe  wrote:
> > 
> > This should have been fixed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32602.
>
> It was reported fixed for 9.5, and Volker’s release message for 9.5.beta6 
> indicates it was included then. And it does not fail for sage 9.5 on my 
> system.
>
> Simon may let us know what config he’s using.
>
> Justin
>
> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 2:58 PM 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-devel <
> sage-...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > On Feb 18, 2022, at 08:09 , Simon Brandhorst  wrote:
> > > 
> > > ```
> > > sage: any([magma(True),magma(True)]) 
> > > Fatal Python error: _Py_CheckRecursiveCall: Cannot recover from stack 
> overflow.
> > > Python runtime state: initialized
> > > 
> > > Thread 0x7f7b15e34700 (most recent call first):
> > > ```
> > > Can anyone reproduce?
> > 
> > This works for me with Sage 9.5 on macOS 10.13.6 (built from scratch). 
> By “works”, I mean I get “True” as a result.
> > The same holds for sage 8.[3-9].
> > 
> > However, with 9.[0-4], I get the same error you report: a stack 
> explosion, ending with SIGABRT.
> > 
> > HTH
> > 
> > Justin
>
> --
> Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large
> Director
> Institute for the Enhancement of the Director's Income
> --
> In mathematics you don't understand
> things. You just get used to them. 
> --John von Neumann
> --
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/d1b99696-db5e-443b-a7ec-10e3c69fa4afn%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [sage-devel] any([magma(True),magma(True)]) produces stack overflow

2022-02-18 Thread 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-devel



> On Feb 18, 2022, at 12:23 , David Roe  wrote:
> 
> This should have been fixed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32602.

It  was reported fixed for 9.5, and Volker’s release message for 9.5.beta6 
indicates it was included then.  And it does not fail for sage 9.5 on my system.

Simon may let us know what config he’s using.

Justin

> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 2:58 PM 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-devel 
>  wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Feb 18, 2022, at 08:09 , Simon Brandhorst  wrote:
> > 
> > ```
> > sage: any([magma(True),magma(True)])
> > 
> >
> > Fatal Python error: _Py_CheckRecursiveCall: Cannot recover from stack 
> > overflow.
> > Python runtime state: initialized
> > 
> > Thread 0x7f7b15e34700 (most recent call first):
> > ```
> > Can anyone reproduce?
> 
> This works for me with Sage 9.5 on macOS 10.13.6 (built from scratch).  By 
> “works”, I mean I get “True” as a result.
> The same holds for sage 8.[3-9].
> 
> However, with 9.[0-4], I get the same error you report: a stack explosion, 
> ending with SIGABRT.
> 
> HTH
> 
> Justin

--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large
Director
Institute for the Enhancement of the Director's Income
--
In mathematics you don't understand
   things. You just get used to them. 
   --John von Neumann
--

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/236B748E-5656-451D-8948-90BB20614D15%40mac.com.


Re: [sage-devel] any([magma(True),magma(True)]) produces stack overflow

2022-02-18 Thread David Roe
This should have been fixed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32602.
David

On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 2:58 PM 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-devel <
sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote:

>
>
> > On Feb 18, 2022, at 08:09 , Simon Brandhorst  wrote:
> >
> > ```
> > sage: any([magma(True),magma(True)])
>
>
> > Fatal Python error: _Py_CheckRecursiveCall: Cannot recover from stack
> overflow.
> > Python runtime state: initialized
> >
> > Thread 0x7f7b15e34700 (most recent call first):
> > ```
> > Can anyone reproduce?
>
> This works for me with Sage 9.5 on macOS 10.13.6 (built from scratch).  By
> “works”, I mean I get “True” as a result.
> The same holds for sage 8.[3-9].
>
> However, with 9.[0-4], I get the same error you report: a stack explosion,
> ending with SIGABRT.
>
> HTH
>
> Justin
>
> --
> Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large
> Director
> Institute for the Enhancement of the Director's income
> ---
> --
> They said it couldn't be done, but sometimes,
> it doesn't work out that way.
>   - Casey Stengel
> --
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/8C8FA0F0-6144-4CB6-995E-4CF4A40ED8A4%40mac.com
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAChs6_%3DWmAund%2Bv%2BWr49x_CwAefKrMC0%2B0uqWofmCgcOXmLeOQ%40mail.gmail.com.


Re: [sage-devel] any([magma(True),magma(True)]) produces stack overflow

2022-02-18 Thread 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-devel



> On Feb 18, 2022, at 08:09 , Simon Brandhorst  wrote:
> 
> ```
> sage: any([magma(True),magma(True)])  
>   
>
> Fatal Python error: _Py_CheckRecursiveCall: Cannot recover from stack 
> overflow.
> Python runtime state: initialized
> 
> Thread 0x7f7b15e34700 (most recent call first):
> ```
> Can anyone reproduce?

This works for me with Sage 9.5 on macOS 10.13.6 (built from scratch).  By 
“works”, I mean I get “True” as a result.
The same holds for sage 8.[3-9].

However, with 9.[0-4], I get the same error you report: a stack explosion, 
ending with SIGABRT.

HTH

Justin

--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large
Director
Institute for the Enhancement of the Director's income
---
--
They said it couldn't be done, but sometimes,
it doesn't work out that way.
  - Casey Stengel
--



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/8C8FA0F0-6144-4CB6-995E-4CF4A40ED8A4%40mac.com.