Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.beta0 released

[Dima Pasechnik]

On Monday, October 7, 2019 at 5:24:07 PM UTC+3, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>
> Volker wrote: 
>
> > 533fd5d6cd (HEAD -> develop, tag: 9.0.beta0, trac/develop) Updated 
> SageMath version to 9.0.beta0 
>
> [...] 
>
> > 93b86bfad3 Trac #24824: Update GLPK to 4.65 
>
> [...] 
>
> On Cygwin64 on Windows 7, building GLPK fails with 
> the following configure error: 
>
> [glpk-4.65.p0] checking for DLL/static GMP... static 
> [glpk-4.65.p0] configure: error: gmp.h isn't a DLL: use 
> --enable-static --disable-shared 
>

do you have Cygwin's GMP package installed?
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/cc8190a3-f53d-40c0-a49c-ff4fda7cfafd%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta3 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM and for a 
*python3 
*build:

  - incremental build (from 9.0.beta2, with -j16) OK 
  - tests from ptestlong passed, except for 

--
sage -t --long --warn-long 51.1 
src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx  # 1 doctest failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 51.1 src/sage/repl/attach.py  # 4 doctests failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 51.1 src/sage/libs/singular/function.pyx  # 1 
doctest failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 51.1 
src/sage/numerical/backends/generic_backend.pyx  # 2 doctests failed
--

Hopefully, these failures are fixed by
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28334 

and
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28622 

which should be merged in Sage 9.0.beta4.

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/926fd271-5173-4699-a4ad-a66a849f113e%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta3 released

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

FWIW, on Debian testing running on a smaller machine (core i5 + 8 GB RAM, 
no gap_packages installed), upgrading a Python 3-based 9.0.beta2 to 
9.0.beta3 gives the usual ptestalllong failures:

Permanent failures :

File| Result  
+-
src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx | 1 doctest failed

Transient failures :

File| Result   
+--
src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py  | 1 doctest failed 
src/sage/plot/animate.py| 7 doctests failed
src/sage/combinat/matrices/hadamard_matrix.py   | 2 doctests failed
src/sage/misc/latex.py  | 1 doctest failed 
src/sage/misc/persist.pyx   | 2 doctests failed
src/sage/coding/databases.py| 2 doctests failed
src/sage/repl/load.py   | 1 doctest failed 
src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py  | 2 doctests failed
src/sage/misc/remote_file.py| 2 doctests failed
src/sage/databases/findstat.py  | 9 doctests failed
src/sage/interfaces/magma_free.py   | 2 doctests failed

HTH,



Le dimanche 27 octobre 2019 19:16:12 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
>
> On Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, the upgrade of a Python 
> 3-base 9.0.beta2 to 9.0.beta3 gives results close to those already reported:
>
> Permanent failures :
>
> File| Result  
> +-
> src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py  | 1 doctest failed
> src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx | 1 doctest failed
>
> Transient failures :
>
> File| Result   
> +--
> src/sage/graphs/generators/smallgraphs.py   | 6 doctests failed
> src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py  | 1 doctest failed 
> src/sage/plot/animate.py| 7 doctests failed
> src/sage/combinat/matrices/hadamard_matrix.py   | 2 doctests failed
> src/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py | 2 doctests failed
> src/sage/coding/databases.py| 2 doctests failed
> src/sage/misc/latex.py  | 1 doctest failed 
> src/sage/misc/persist.pyx   | 2 doctests failed
> src/sage/repl/load.py   | 1 doctest failed 
> src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py  | 2 doctests failed
> src/sage/combinat/designs/ext_rep.py| 1 doctest failed 
> src/sage/misc/remote_file.py| 2 doctests failed
> src/sage/databases/findstat.py  | 9 doctests failed
>
> The transient failure on ssmod.py wasn't seen previously. OTOH, I've 
> fiddled with the CPU speed control of the machine...
>
> HTH,
>
>
>
> Le dimanche 27 octobre 2019 01:48:46 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :
>>
>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
>> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
>> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 
>>
>>
>> 906b12b1e2 (tag: 9.0.beta3, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 
>> 9.0.beta3
>> 4e12d998bc Trac #28562: Tensor Fields: Better Zero Treatment
>> 78d7905fc3 Trac #28531: bliss canonical labels ignores edge labels
>> 9b8f10e98f Trac #28642: Silence pyflakes warning
>> 3a0581721d Trac #28601: some typos and https
>> ceee1d48ad Trac #28463: .neighbors() error in polyhedron.representation
>> c4738d71aa Trac #28159: Vector Bundles
>> 7f4acc39f8 Trac #20264: Hasse-Weil Zeta function of a cyclic cover of P1 
>> over finite fields.
>> 1ece1cfe12 Trac #28636: refresh the pieri_factors file
>> 6d35e3a139 Trac #28619: Reference manual doesn't build with 
>> --include-tests-blocks
>> 0bdecde0d4 Trac #28637: remove deprecated alias for algebraic dependency
>> 948658943c Trac #28631: Implement polynomial factorization over universal 
>> cyclotomic field
>> f2e5a05dd9 Trac #28625: Let CombinatorialPolyhedron handle f_vector of 
>> polyhedra
>> c07209551d Trac #28621: Add CombinatorialPolyhedron method to Polyhedron 
>> objects
>> e745a8cb7c Trac #28604: CombinatorialPolyhedron: ridge_graph -> 
>> facet_graph
>> 847b27812f Trac #28603: CombinatorialPolyhedron: edge_graph -> 
>> vertex_graph
>> adf7c6f30a Trac #28600: Use standard notation for pullback and 
>> pushforward on manifolds
>> dafcaac1cb Trac #28155: Check for formality of GCDA's
>> b81b