[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.3.rc2 released

2021-04-08 Thread Matthias Köppe 
I have opened tickets for some but not all of these issues:

#31624 
fedora-34-standard: eclib, singular build failures with system ntl 


#31623 
homebrew-macos-10.15-standard-default: Doctest errors related to singular 


#31622 
conda-forge-macos: RuntimeError from qqbar cmp_elements_with_same_minpoly 


#31621 
ubuntu-groovy-standard: numerics-related sage testsuite errors 


Help is needed...

On Thursday, April 8, 2021 at 9:27:54 AM UTC-7 Matthias Köppe wrote:

> On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 10:29:29 AM UTC-7 Matthias Köppe wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, April 6, 2021 at 3:33:00 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
>>> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
>>> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 
>>>
>>> 824f9cccaf (tag: 9.3.rc2, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 
>>> 9.3.rc2
>>>
>>
>> Tests on various platforms are running at:
>> - https://github.com/sagemath/sage/actions/runs/724020346 (Linux and 
>> macOS)
>> - https://github.com/sagemath/sage/actions/runs/724020349 (Cygwin)
>> - https://github.com/sagemath/sage/actions/runs/724020348 (optional 
>> packages)
>>
>
> Here's a summary of these runs. I am comparing to 9.3.beta8, for which the 
> results were summarized in:
> - https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/KdSKg6RdZok/m/zM2Bhfm0AwAJ, 
> - https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/KdSKg6RdZok/m/75iHB1nYAwAJ,
> - https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/KdSKg6RdZok/m/3Fkd7K1aAgAJ, 
> - https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/KdSKg6RdZok/m/GXfB1rW1AgAJ:
>
> 9.3.beta8> 
> *ubuntu*-{trusty,xenial,bionic,focal,groovy,hirsute}-{minimal,standard}: 
> Clean
> 9.3.beta8> *debian*-{jessie,stretch,buster,bullseye,sid}-{minimal,standard}: 
> Clean
> 9.3.beta8> ... with the exception of:
> 9.3.beta8> {debian-bullseye,ubuntu-groovy}-standard: cvxopt testsuite 
> errors, *numerics-related sage testsuite errors*
> 9.3.beta8> (is system BLAS feeling OK??)
>
> The numerics failures on debian-bullseye have disappeared (or perhaps it 
> is processor dependent, and we were luckier in this run), but show up in 
> debian-sid this time. 
> *The numerics failures on **ubuntu-groovy are still present. **Could 
> someone please help by taking a look at these numerics errors on?*
> Everything else is unchanged in 9.3.rc2 (with some more results in thanks 
> to #31502). 
>
> 9.3.beta8> *linuxmint*-17-{minimal,standard}: *Doctest errors from 
> "setlocale" output*
> 9.3.beta8> linuxmint-{18,19,19.3,20.1}-{minimal,standard}: Clean
>
> Unchanged in 9.3.rc2. GH Actions running out of disk space in 
> linuxmint-20.1-standard - despite #31502.
>
> 9.3.beta8> *fedora*-26-minimal, centos-7-minimal, centos-7-i386-minimal: 
> openssl problem
>
> fedora-26-minimal and centos-7-minimal are clean now, thanks to 
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31439
>
> 9.3.beta8> fedora-{26,27,29,30,31,32,33}-standard: Clean
> 9.3.beta8> fedora-{27,28,29,30,31,32,33}-minimal: Clean
> 9.3.beta8> fedora-28-standard: 
> 9.3.beta8> - cvxopt testsuite errors
> 9.3.beta8> - src/sage/rings/polynomial/groebner_fan.py # 3 doctests failed
> 9.3.beta8> - *src/sage/rings/real_mpfr.pyx # Killed due to abort*
>
> *fedora-28-standard:* *Similar but not the same failures in 9.3.rc2*
>
> 9.3.beta8> fedora-34-standard:
> 9.3.beta8>   [eclib-20190909]   /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/*libntl.so: 
> undefined reference* to 
> `std::__exception_ptr::exception_ptr::_M_release()@CXXABI_1.3.13'
>
> *fedora-34-standard eclib problem is unchanged in 9.3.rc2, and also issues 
> with ntl show up in singular*
>
> 9.3.beta8> *centos*-7-standard: [dochtml] ImportError: /lib64/*libz.so.1: 
> version `ZLIB_1.2.9' not found* (required by 
> /sage/local/lib/libpng16.so.16)
>
> Unchanged in 9.3.rc2
>
> 9.3.beta8> centos-8-{minimal,standard}: Clean
>
> 9.3.beta8> *gentoo*-{minimal,standard}: Clean
> 9.3.beta8> gentoo-python3.7-{minimal,standard}: Clean
>
> *New doctest failures *for all of these from linker messages - 
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31578
>
> 9.3.beta8> *archlinux*-latest-{minimal,standard}: Clean
>
> Unchanged in 9.3.rc2
>
> 9.3.beta8> *slackware*-14.2-{minimal,standard}: Clean
>
> Unchanged in 9.3.rc2
>
> 9.3.beta8> *conda-forge*-minimal: *Error building package python3-3.9.1*
> 9.3.beta8> *conda-forge*-standard: *Sage does not accept system python3*
>
> Unchanged in 9.3.rc2
>
> 9.3.beta8> *ubuntu-*{bionic,focal}*-i386*-minimal: 
> [openssl-3.0.0-alpha11] /usr/include/stdio.h:27:10: fatal error: 
> bits/libc-header-start.h: No such file or directory
> 9.3.beta8> *debian*-buster-*i386*-minimal: likewise
> 9.3.beta8>

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.rc2 released

2021-04-08 Thread 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release 
Just finished up compiling and testing the three .rc releases for sage 9.3.

I did this on my three macOS systems: 10.13.6 (2017 iMac Pro, 18-core Xeon W), 
10.14.6 (2017 MBP, quad-core Core i7), and 10.15.7 (2019 MBP, 8-core Core i9).

> On Apr 6, 2021, at 15:33 , Volker Braun  wrote:
> 
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. 
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 

For RC0 and RC1, none of the builds completed, due to a failure for Pynac (the 
same in all 6 cases: “/usr/local” leakage).

For RC2, all builds completed without problem, and all tests (‘ptestlong’) 
passed.

Justin

--
Justin C. Walker
Curmudgeon-at-large
--
Network, n., Difference between work
charged for and work done



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/85167BB2-8CAD-4067-91FE-709BFE157E22%40mac.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.3.rc2 released

2021-04-08 Thread Matthias Köppe 
On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 10:29:29 AM UTC-7 Matthias Köppe wrote:

> On Tuesday, April 6, 2021 at 3:33:00 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote:
>
>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
>> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
>> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 
>>
>> 824f9cccaf (tag: 9.3.rc2, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 
>> 9.3.rc2
>>
>
> Tests on various platforms are running at:
> - https://github.com/sagemath/sage/actions/runs/724020346 (Linux and 
> macOS)
> - https://github.com/sagemath/sage/actions/runs/724020349 (Cygwin)
> - https://github.com/sagemath/sage/actions/runs/724020348 (optional 
> packages)
>

Here's a summary of these runs. I am comparing to 9.3.beta8, for which the 
results were summarized in:
- https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/KdSKg6RdZok/m/zM2Bhfm0AwAJ, 
- https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/KdSKg6RdZok/m/75iHB1nYAwAJ,
- https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/KdSKg6RdZok/m/3Fkd7K1aAgAJ, 
- https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/KdSKg6RdZok/m/GXfB1rW1AgAJ:

9.3.beta8> 
*ubuntu*-{trusty,xenial,bionic,focal,groovy,hirsute}-{minimal,standard}: 
Clean
9.3.beta8> *debian*-{jessie,stretch,buster,bullseye,sid}-{minimal,standard}: 
Clean
9.3.beta8> ... with the exception of:
9.3.beta8> {debian-bullseye,ubuntu-groovy}-standard: cvxopt testsuite 
errors, *numerics-related sage testsuite errors*
9.3.beta8> (is system BLAS feeling OK??)

The numerics failures on debian-bullseye have disappeared (or perhaps it is 
processor dependent, and we were luckier in this run), but show up in 
debian-sid this time. 
*The numerics failures on **ubuntu-groovy are still present. **Could 
someone please help by taking a look at these numerics errors on?*
Everything else is unchanged in 9.3.rc2 (with some more results in thanks 
to #31502). 

9.3.beta8> *linuxmint*-17-{minimal,standard}: *Doctest errors from 
"setlocale" output*
9.3.beta8> linuxmint-{18,19,19.3,20.1}-{minimal,standard}: Clean

Unchanged in 9.3.rc2. GH Actions running out of disk space in 
linuxmint-20.1-standard - despite #31502.

9.3.beta8> *fedora*-26-minimal, centos-7-minimal, centos-7-i386-minimal: 
openssl problem

fedora-26-minimal and centos-7-minimal are clean now, thanks to 
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31439

9.3.beta8> fedora-{26,27,29,30,31,32,33}-standard: Clean
9.3.beta8> fedora-{27,28,29,30,31,32,33}-minimal: Clean
9.3.beta8> fedora-28-standard: 
9.3.beta8> - cvxopt testsuite errors
9.3.beta8> - src/sage/rings/polynomial/groebner_fan.py # 3 doctests failed
9.3.beta8> - *src/sage/rings/real_mpfr.pyx # Killed due to abort*

*fedora-28-standard:* *Similar but not the same failures in 9.3.rc2*

9.3.beta8> fedora-34-standard:
9.3.beta8>   [eclib-20190909]   /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/*libntl.so: 
undefined reference* to 
`std::__exception_ptr::exception_ptr::_M_release()@CXXABI_1.3.13'

*fedora-34-standard eclib problem is unchanged in 9.3.rc2, and also issues 
with ntl show up in singular*

9.3.beta8> *centos*-7-standard: [dochtml] ImportError: /lib64/*libz.so.1: 
version `ZLIB_1.2.9' not found* (required by /sage/local/lib/libpng16.so.16)

Unchanged in 9.3.rc2

9.3.beta8> centos-8-{minimal,standard}: Clean

9.3.beta8> *gentoo*-{minimal,standard}: Clean
9.3.beta8> gentoo-python3.7-{minimal,standard}: Clean

*New doctest failures *for all of these from linker messages 
- https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31578

9.3.beta8> *archlinux*-latest-{minimal,standard}: Clean

Unchanged in 9.3.rc2

9.3.beta8> *slackware*-14.2-{minimal,standard}: Clean

Unchanged in 9.3.rc2

9.3.beta8> *conda-forge*-minimal: *Error building package python3-3.9.1*
9.3.beta8> *conda-forge*-standard: *Sage does not accept system python3*

Unchanged in 9.3.rc2

9.3.beta8> *ubuntu-*{bionic,focal}*-i386*-minimal: [openssl-3.0.0-alpha11] 
/usr/include/stdio.h:27:10: fatal error: bits/libc-header-start.h: No such 
file or directory
9.3.beta8> *debian*-buster-*i386*-minimal: likewise
9.3.beta8> debian-buster-i386-standard: Clean except for
9.3.beta8> - src/sage/*parallel/decorate.py* # 1 doctest failed
9.3.beta8> - src/sage/schemes/*elliptic_curves/ell_field.py* # 1 doctest 
failed
 

9.3.beta8> *homebrew-macos-10.15**-minimal**-xcode_11.7* (
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/2051746258): Clean except for:
9.3.beta8> sage -t --random-seed=0 src/sage/geometry/polyhedron/base.py  # 
1 doctest failed (*get_memory_usage*)
9.3.beta8> sage -t --random-seed=0 src/sage/interfaces/gap.py  # 1 doctest 
failed
9.3.beta8> (File "src/sage/interfaces/*gap*.py", line 482, in 
sage.interfaces.gap.Gap_generic._read_in_file_command)

9.3.beta8> *-standard-default* likewise

*New errors that appear to be related to Singular!*
*https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/2282411164*
*sage -t --random-seed=0 
src/sage/dynamics/arithmetic_dynamics/projective_ds.py  # 12 doctests 
failed*
*sage -t --random-seed=0 src/sage/geometry/polyhedron/base.py  # 1 doctest 
failed*
*sage -t

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.3.rc2 released

2021-04-08 Thread Samuel Lelièvre 
Thanks Volker for the new release and Matthias for the overview
of remaining work.

On macOS 10.14.6 with many Homebrew packages, from an
existing SageMath 9.3.rc0, after the following commands:
```
$ source .homebrew-build-env && ./bootstrap -q && ./configure -q
```
the extraneous configure message (dealt with at #31496) was
displayed. After that, the following commands
```
$ MAKE='make -j1' && make -s V=0 && make -s V=0 testlong
```
gave "All tests passed!".: )   : )   : )--Samuel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAEcArF2a5J8jCC-Vj%3DoRRKVbgTqRfKMc83tYvtibdwBztHiLDw%40mail.gmail.com.