Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6 released

[François Bissey]

I finally pushed 9.6 to master in sage-on-gentoo. An unusually long time 
between actual release and availability for me.
Early testing seems to show we suffer from 
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33304 in a repeatable manner in 9.6 in Gentoo. 
May be we’ll be able to tackle it.

> On 16/05/2022, at 10:27, Volker Braun  wrote:
> 
> The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-9.6. As always, you can get 
> the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the 
> self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
> 
> There was no change over 9.6.rc4
> Sage
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sage-release" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/71a2285d-226c-4aac-a804-971a58710ad5n%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/914331AF-EA48-472E-910D-4FD158A8573B%40gmail.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6 released

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

On Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM :

   - with Sage’s own python : same results as in the last couple of rcs ; 
   - with system’s Python : catastrophic failure 
   . 

HTH,
​
Le lundi 16 mai 2022 à 00:27:40 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :

> The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-9.6. As always, you can 
> get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, 
> the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> There was no change over 9.6.rc4
> Sage
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/4577af1e-eb11-4847-8887-6f4d71940850n%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Final 9.6 upgrade is catastrophic on Debian testing

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

After perusing the failures log and some wild guesses, problem worked 
around by ./configure --with-system-python=no.

Does this problem deserve reporting to Debian (*i. e.* filing a ticket 
against Debianpython3 package) ?
​
Le lundi 16 mai 2022 à 16:03:05 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :

> On another machine, Sage builds, but `ptestlong` fails with a slightly 
> smaller list of failures :
>
> ```
> --
> sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
> src/sage/schemes/cyclic_covers/cycliccover_finite_field.py  # 1 doctest 
> failed
> sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
> src/sage/dynamics/arithmetic_dynamics/projective_ds.py  # Killed due to 
> abort
> sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
> src/sage/schemes/curves/projective_curve.py  # Killed due to abort
> sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
> src/sage/schemes/curves/affine_curve.py  # 48 doctests failed
> sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
> src/sage/rings/function_field/ideal.py  # 12 doctests failed
> sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
> src/sage/schemes/curves/closed_point.py  # 23 doctests failed
> sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
> src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_field.py  # Killed due to abort
> sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
> src/sage/rings/function_field/differential.py  # 2 doctests failed
> sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
> src/sage/schemes/product_projective/rational_point.py  # 1 doctest failed
> sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
> src/sage/schemes/curves/curve.py  # 14 doctests failed
> sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
> src/sage/interfaces/singular.py  # 5 doctests failed
> sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
> src/sage/schemes/curves/constructor.py  # 4 doctests failed
> sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
> src/sage/schemes/curves/point.py  # 6 doctests failed
> sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
> src/sage/libs/singular/function.pyx  # 1 doctest failed
> sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
> src/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_element.py  # Killed due to abort
> sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
> src/doc/en/constructions/algebraic_geometry.rst  # Killed due to abort
> sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
> src/sage/libs/singular/singular.pyx  # 1 doctest failed
> --
> ```  
>
> Suggestions ?
>
> Le lundi 16 mai 2022 à 14:56:14 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
>
>> After make dist-upgrade, rebuilding Sage faiis opn the *documentation* :
>>
>> [sagemath_doc_html-none] NameError: Singular library 'freegb.lib' not found
>> [sagemath_doc_html-none] 
>> [sagemath_doc_html-none] Note: incremental documentation builds 
>> sometimes cause spurious
>> [sagemath_doc_html-none] error messages. To be certain that these are 
>> real errors, run
>> [sagemath_doc_html-none] "make doc-clean doc-uninstall" first and try 
>> again.
>>
>> This happens even after make doc-clean doc-uninstall. Still stuck.
>>
>> Do you need logs/install.log ?
>> ​
>> Le lundi 16 mai 2022 à 13:24:04 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
>>
>>> Le lundi 16 mai 2022 à 13:17:53 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>>>
>>> Have you rebuilt from scratch after the system update?

>>> Nope. That’s usually unnecesary.
>>>
>>> Any update of a dynamic library used by Sage can lead to lots of errors, 
 unless the relevant components are rebuilt.

>>> I’ll try that (*i. e* make distclean && ./configure 
>>> --enable-download-from-upstream-url && make ptestlong) . Not especially 
>>> fun…
>>>
>>> On Mon, 16 May 2022, 12:13 Emmanuel Charpentier,  
 wrote:

> Observed on two systems running Debian testing (updated daily).
>
> On these two systems, 9.6.rc4 (*resp* 9.6.rc4) gave satisfying 
> results (already reported). After daily system update, the compilation of 
> 9.6 went well, bit ptestlong gave catastrophic results : 57 (fifty 
> seven, count 'em !) segfaults...
>
> Enclosed an archive containing :
>
>- config.log 
>- config.status 
>- logs\install.log 
>- logs/ptestlong.log 
>
> I'm at loss
>
> -- Emmanuel Charpentier
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "sage-release" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to 

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6 released

[Matthias Köppe]

Please add 
to https://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/ReleaseTours/sage-9.6#Availabilityasbinaries

On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 12:24:12 PM UTC-7 William Stein wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the new release!
>
> I built the cocalc-docker images [1] using sage-9.6 on both x86-64 and
> amd64 (Apple Silicon) and the builds worked fine, and everything I
> tested regarding integration with CoCalc also worked fine. I've
> updated these images on Dockerhub.
>
> CoCalc-docker is basically a large image that has Sage, Jupyter,
> Pluto.jl, VS Code, a web-based X11 server, LaTeX, SageTex, a new 
> collaborative
> Whiteboard with Sage code cells, and much more all together in one
> easy to install
> and run image. But it's big -- 25GB uncompressed -- so may or may not
> be of use
> depending on what you're doing...
>
> [1] https://github.com/sagemathinc/cocalc-docker
>
> -- William
>
>
> On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 3:33 PM Matthias Köppe  
> wrote:
> >
> > Yay! Thanks a lot, Volker.
> >
> > On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 3:27:40 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote:
> >>
> >> The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-9.6. As always, you 
> can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. 
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
> >>
> >> There was no change over 9.6.rc4
> >> Sage
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "sage-release" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to sage-release...@googlegroups.com.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/f8367c34-48c8-4227-b484-a98ced30ad0dn%40googlegroups.com
> .
>
>
>
> --
> William (http://wstein.org)
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/38209b2f-e5a5-4997-9ccc-d8ce63aa50cen%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6 released

[William Stein]

Hi,

Thanks for the new release!

I built the cocalc-docker images [1] using sage-9.6 on both x86-64 and
amd64 (Apple Silicon) and the builds worked fine, and everything I
tested regarding integration with CoCalc also worked fine.  I've
updated these images on Dockerhub.

CoCalc-docker is basically a large image that has Sage, Jupyter,
Pluto.jl, VS Code, a web-based X11 server, LaTeX, SageTex, a new collaborative
Whiteboard with Sage code cells, and much more all together in one
easy to install
and run image.  But it's big -- 25GB uncompressed -- so may or may not
be of use
depending on what you're doing...

[1] https://github.com/sagemathinc/cocalc-docker

 -- William


On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 3:33 PM Matthias Köppe  wrote:
>
> Yay! Thanks a lot, Volker.
>
> On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 3:27:40 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-9.6. As always, you can get 
>> the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the 
>> self-contained source tarball is at 
>> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>>
>> There was no change over 9.6.rc4
>> Sage
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sage-release" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/f8367c34-48c8-4227-b484-a98ced30ad0dn%40googlegroups.com.



--
William (http://wstein.org)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CACLE5GB%3Dz_fbufivX7BQNsVsTsk_zN5xwJad7WHCMafsVH3ryw%40mail.gmail.com.

[sage-release] Sage 9.6 Ubuntu 20-04

[Thierry Dumont]

Starting from a fresh clone:

Compilation ok.

A warning when doing "sage -optional":

/usr/local/sages/sage/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10.3/lib/python3.10/site-packages/sage/misc/package.py:119: 
UserWarning: failed to fetch the version of pkg='ore_algebra' at 
https://pypi.org/pypi/ore_algebra/json
  warnings.warn("failed to fetch the version of pkg={!r} at 
{}".format(pkg, url))



t.d.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/1e8351a0-ea23-a67d-85ff-03b719336bbd%40math.univ-lyon1.fr.

Re: [sage-release] Final 9.6 upgrade is catastrophic on Debian testing

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

On another machine, Sage builds, but `ptestlong` fails with a slightly 
smaller list of failures :

```
--
sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
src/sage/schemes/cyclic_covers/cycliccover_finite_field.py  # 1 doctest 
failed
sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
src/sage/dynamics/arithmetic_dynamics/projective_ds.py  # Killed due to 
abort
sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
src/sage/schemes/curves/projective_curve.py  # Killed due to abort
sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
src/sage/schemes/curves/affine_curve.py  # 48 doctests failed
sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
src/sage/rings/function_field/ideal.py  # 12 doctests failed
sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
src/sage/schemes/curves/closed_point.py  # 23 doctests failed
sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_field.py  # Killed due to abort
sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
src/sage/rings/function_field/differential.py  # 2 doctests failed
sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
src/sage/schemes/product_projective/rational_point.py  # 1 doctest failed
sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
src/sage/schemes/curves/curve.py  # 14 doctests failed
sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
src/sage/interfaces/singular.py  # 5 doctests failed
sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
src/sage/schemes/curves/constructor.py  # 4 doctests failed
sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
src/sage/schemes/curves/point.py  # 6 doctests failed
sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
src/sage/libs/singular/function.pyx  # 1 doctest failed
sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
src/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_element.py  # Killed due to abort
sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
src/doc/en/constructions/algebraic_geometry.rst  # Killed due to abort
sage -t --long --random-seed=292720829567961557971978070321731961282 
src/sage/libs/singular/singular.pyx  # 1 doctest failed
--
```  

Suggestions ?

Le lundi 16 mai 2022 à 14:56:14 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :

> After make dist-upgrade, rebuilding Sage faiis opn the *documentation* :
>
> [sagemath_doc_html-none] NameError: Singular library 'freegb.lib' not found
> [sagemath_doc_html-none] 
> [sagemath_doc_html-none] Note: incremental documentation builds sometimes 
> cause spurious
> [sagemath_doc_html-none] error messages. To be certain that these are 
> real errors, run
> [sagemath_doc_html-none] "make doc-clean doc-uninstall" first and try 
> again.
>
> This happens even after make doc-clean doc-uninstall. Still stuck.
>
> Do you need logs/install.log ?
> ​
> Le lundi 16 mai 2022 à 13:24:04 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
>
>> Le lundi 16 mai 2022 à 13:17:53 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>>
>> Have you rebuilt from scratch after the system update?
>>>
>> Nope. That’s usually unnecesary.
>>
>> Any update of a dynamic library used by Sage can lead to lots of errors, 
>>> unless the relevant components are rebuilt.
>>>
>> I’ll try that (*i. e* make distclean && ./configure 
>> --enable-download-from-upstream-url && make ptestlong) . Not especially 
>> fun…
>>
>> On Mon, 16 May 2022, 12:13 Emmanuel Charpentier,  
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Observed on two systems running Debian testing (updated daily).

 On these two systems, 9.6.rc4 (*resp* 9.6.rc4) gave satisfying results 
 (already reported). After daily system update, the compilation of 9.6 
 went well, bit ptestlong gave catastrophic results : 57 (fifty seven, 
 count 'em !) segfaults...

 Enclosed an archive containing :

- config.log 
- config.status 
- logs\install.log 
- logs/ptestlong.log 

 I'm at loss

 -- Emmanuel Charpentier

 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups "sage-release" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an email to sage-release...@googlegroups.com.
 To view this discussion on the web visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/b6cb0005953d0196ed460cd7159e9165b0eb18b4.camel%40free.fr
  
 
 .

>>> ​
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 

Re: [sage-release] Final 9.6 upgrade is catastrophic on Debian testing

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

After make dist-upgrade, rebuilding Sage faiis opn the *documentation* :

[sagemath_doc_html-none] NameError: Singular library 'freegb.lib' not found
[sagemath_doc_html-none] 
[sagemath_doc_html-none] Note: incremental documentation builds sometimes 
cause spurious
[sagemath_doc_html-none] error messages. To be certain that these are real 
errors, run
[sagemath_doc_html-none] "make doc-clean doc-uninstall" first and try again.

This happens even after make doc-clean doc-uninstall. Still stuck.

Do you need logs/install.log ?
​
Le lundi 16 mai 2022 à 13:24:04 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :

> Le lundi 16 mai 2022 à 13:17:53 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>
> Have you rebuilt from scratch after the system update?
>>
> Nope. That’s usually unnecesary.
>
> Any update of a dynamic library used by Sage can lead to lots of errors, 
>> unless the relevant components are rebuilt.
>>
> I’ll try that (*i. e* make distclean && ./configure 
> --enable-download-from-upstream-url && make ptestlong) . Not especially 
> fun…
>
> On Mon, 16 May 2022, 12:13 Emmanuel Charpentier,  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Observed on two systems running Debian testing (updated daily).
>>>
>>> On these two systems, 9.6.rc4 (*resp* 9.6.rc4) gave satisfying results 
>>> (already reported). After daily system update, the compilation of 9.6 
>>> went well, bit ptestlong gave catastrophic results : 57 (fifty seven, 
>>> count 'em !) segfaults...
>>>
>>> Enclosed an archive containing :
>>>
>>>- config.log 
>>>- config.status 
>>>- logs\install.log 
>>>- logs/ptestlong.log 
>>>
>>> I'm at loss
>>>
>>> -- Emmanuel Charpentier
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "sage-release" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to sage-release...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/b6cb0005953d0196ed460cd7159e9165b0eb18b4.camel%40free.fr
>>>  
>>> 
>>> .
>>>
>> ​
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/948e16b6-29c8-4ed2-ad10-737a18289209n%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Final 9.6 upgrade is catastrophic on Debian testing

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

Le lundi 16 mai 2022 à 13:17:53 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :

Have you rebuilt from scratch after the system update?
>
Nope. That’s usually unnecesary.

Any update of a dynamic library used by Sage can lead to lots of errors, 
> unless the relevant components are rebuilt.
>
I’ll try that (*i. e* make distclean && ./configure 
--enable-download-from-upstream-url && make ptestlong) . Not especially fun…

On Mon, 16 May 2022, 12:13 Emmanuel Charpentier,  wrote:
>
>> Observed on two systems running Debian testing (updated daily).
>>
>> On these two systems, 9.6.rc4 (*resp* 9.6.rc4) gave satisfying results 
>> (already reported). After daily system update, the compilation of 9.6 
>> went well, bit ptestlong gave catastrophic results : 57 (fifty seven, 
>> count 'em !) segfaults...
>>
>> Enclosed an archive containing :
>>
>>- config.log 
>>- config.status 
>>- logs\install.log 
>>- logs/ptestlong.log 
>>
>> I'm at loss
>>
>> -- Emmanuel Charpentier
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "sage-release" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to sage-release...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/b6cb0005953d0196ed460cd7159e9165b0eb18b4.camel%40free.fr
>>  
>> 
>> .
>>
> ​

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/5de56a5e-df0d-4447-8186-a83e30272b93n%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Final 9.6 upgrade is catastrophic on Debian testing

[Dima Pasechnik]

Have you rebuilt from scratch after the system update? Any update of a
dynamic library used by Sage can lead to lots of errors, unless the
relevant components are rebuilt.


On Mon, 16 May 2022, 12:13 Emmanuel Charpentier, 
wrote:

> Observed on two systems running Debian testing (updated daily).
>
> On these two systems, 9.6.rc4 (*resp* 9.6.rc4) gave satisfying results
> (already reported). After daily system update, the compilation of 9.6
> went well, bit ptestlong gave catastrophic results : 57 (fifty seven,
> count 'em !) segfaults...
>
> Enclosed an archive containing :
>
>- config.log
>- config.status
>- logs\install.log
>- logs/ptestlong.log
>
> I'm at loss
>
> -- Emmanuel Charpentier
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-release" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/b6cb0005953d0196ed460cd7159e9165b0eb18b4.camel%40free.fr
> 
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq0HRAeqNZTAac5d0jDLZX4yEOsAeKmArw2mU3bq%2B7pLbA%40mail.gmail.com.