[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.3.beta6 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- incremental build (-j16) from 10.3.beta5 with system python (3.10.12): OK
- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/d1d36a4e-c8e6-4e8a-9617-e0305fea3a2fn%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.3.beta3 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- incremental build (-j16) from 10.3.beta1 with system python (3.10.12): OK
- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"

Eric.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/28908d27-aea4-4c26-af98-fed175878948n%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.3.beta3 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Hi Vincent,

Le mardi 19 décembre 2023 à 09:16:11 UTC+1, vdelecroix a écrit :

Build does not work if python-flit is not present 

[editables-0.5] ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'flit_core' 
[editables-0.5] Error building a wheel for editables-0.5 


For the record, I don't have this issue here (Ubuntu 22.04): Sage 
10.3.beta3 builds successfully, while the Ubuntu package flit is not 
installed. 

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/8fff0748-03fe-49f4-ab0e-01691690c1e0n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.3.beta1 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Thanks for the release. 

On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- parallel build (-j16) from a fresh git clone + pull develop, with system 
python (3.10.12): OK
- make ptestlong gave a single error:

sage -t --long --random-seed=676542016572831857751872562668780748 
src/sage/numerical/backends/logging_backend.py  # Killed due to abort

The test is passed when run standalone. 
The same error (maybe a race issue) has been reported previously for Sage 
9.6.beta2: 
https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/vxYHQA6LUGw/m/0sfDdPnECAAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/vxYHQA6LUGw/m/GXGFksByAQAJ

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/893c584b-ca1c-43e3-ac29-c2f137de32d9n%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc4 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le mardi 21 novembre 2023 à 07:42:26 UTC+1, tdumont a écrit :


For me: 
-Debian testing, up to date 
-upgraded from 10.2 rc3 (NO make distclean) 
it works: 

sage: -log(1-x).series(x).simplify() 
1/19*x^19 + 1/18*x^18 + 1/17*x^17 + 1/16*x^16 + 1/15*x^15 + 1/14*x^14 + 
1/13*x^13 + 1/12*x^12 + 1/11*x^11 + 1/10*x^10 + 1/9*x^9 + 1/8*x^8 + 
1/7*x^7 + 1/6*x^6 + 1/5*x^5 + 1/4*x^4 + 1/3*x^3 + 1/2*x^2 + x - Order(x^20) 


Same here (Ubuntu 22.04): it works with Sage 10.2.rc4, upgraded from 
10.2.rc3. 

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/29e416e5-d378-4b31-b57f-558b8c5830f7n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc4 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- incremental build (-j16) from 10.2.rc3, with system python (3.10.12): OK
- make ptestlong fails on src/sage/libs/giac/__init__.py:

sage -t --long --warn-long 65.0 
--random-seed=32308605943777602951638175933820216 
src/sage/libs/giac/__init__.py
Timed out (and interrupt failed)
**
Tests run before process (pid=136357) timed out:
sage: from sage.libs.giac import groebner_basis as gb_giac # random ## line 
15 ##
sage: P = PolynomialRing(QQ, 6, 'x') ## line 16 ##
sage: I = sage.rings.ideal.Cyclic(P) ## line 17 ##
sage: B = gb_giac(I.gens()) # random ## line 18 ##
// Groebner basis computation time 0.086224 Memory 220.92M
sage: B ## line 19 ##
Polynomial Sequence with 45 Polynomials in 6 Variables
sage: sig_on_count() # check sig_on/off pairings (virtual doctest) ## line 
21 ##
0
sage: from sage.libs.giac import GiacSettingsDefaultContext ## line 55 ##
sage: from sage.libs.giac.giac import giacsettings ## line 56 ##
sage: giacsettings.proba_epsilon = 1e-16 ## line 57 ##
sage: with GiacSettingsDefaultContext(): giacsettings.proba_epsilon = 1e-12 
## line 58 ##
sage: giacsettings.proba_epsilon < 1e-14 ## line 59 ##
True
sage: sig_on_count() # check sig_on/off pairings (virtual doctest) ## line 
62 ##
0
sage: from sage.libs.giac import GiacSettingsDefaultContext ## line 72 ##
sage: from sage.libs.giac.giac import giacsettings ## line 73 ##
sage: giacsettings.proba_epsilon = 1e-16 ## line 74 ##
sage: with GiacSettingsDefaultContext(): giacsettings.proba_epsilon = 1e-30 
## line 75 ##
sage: giacsettings.proba_epsilon < 1e-20 ## line 76 ##
False
sage: sig_on_count() # check sig_on/off pairings (virtual doctest) ## line 
79 ##
0
sage: def testf(a,b):
   giacsettings.proba_epsilon = a/100
   giacsettings.threads = b+2
   return (giacsettings.proba_epsilon, giacsettings.threads) ## line 93 ##
sage: from sage.libs.giac.giac import giacsettings ## line 98 ##
sage: from sage.libs.giac import local_giacsettings ## line 99 ##
sage: gporig, gtorig = (giacsettings.proba_epsilon,giacsettings.threads) ## 
line 100 ##
sage: gp, gt = 
local_giacsettings(testf)(giacsettings.proba_epsilon,giacsettings.threads) 
## line 101 ##
sage: gporig == giacsettings.proba_epsilon ## line 102 ##
True
sage: gtorig == giacsettings.threads ## line 104 ##
True
sage: gphttps://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/938cbd6c-e40d-4a91-8800-29ee3a432b7cn%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc3 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- incremental build (-j16) from 10.2.rc2, with system python (3.10.12): OK
- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/afe1a399-49a0-4283-93bf-5d5b24a9b7cfn%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc2 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Thank you for having merged https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36529 !

Eric.


Le dimanche 12 novembre 2023 à 22:42:41 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit :

> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
>
> 4430e4cc37c (tag: 10.2.rc2, github/develop) Updated SageMath version to 
> 10.2.rc2
> 883e05f8ee0 gh-36698: src/sage/combinat/root_system/coxeter_group.py: Fix 
> typo in lazy_import
> a0872bed5c9 gh-36671: build/pkgs/openblas: Stop openblas from using 
> explicit `make -j N`; but use `make -j 1` on `ubuntu-trusty`
> 405e166238e gh-36669: Sage knows Hadamard matrices <1201, not 1001
> bb7cf9b7c64 gh-36529: src/sage/misc/latex.py: fix view()
> e349b002499 (tag: 10.2.rc1) Updated SageMath version to 10.2.rc1
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/c2a87e5a-5645-439a-99b5-88a0c5661862n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc0 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Thanks for the rc release. 
The function view() is still broken in it, but 
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36529
offers a fix. 
It would be nice if it could be merged in the final 10.2 release. 

Eric. 

Le dimanche 5 novembre 2023 à 18:22:44 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit :

> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
>
> ebef87aa8db (tag: 10.2.rc0, github/develop) Updated SageMath version to 
> 10.2.rc0
> be0b5cf887f gh-36647: fix random doctest error in 
> `src/sage/rings/polynomial/skew_polynomial_finite_field.pyx`
> 4533ffbea9b gh-36639: fix broken pyright in CI
> 636c96c96f8 gh-36636: Deploy live doc on push to develop
> d1da6ba6e3f gh-36635: clean the file hexad.py
> a54d377cc16 gh-36634: permutation_normal_form : case of empty matrices
> 505b6a40e99 gh-36632: .ci/merge-fixes.sh: Reduce output
> 29e95c5847a gh-36628: some simplifications in doctest/ folder (ruff C4)
> 7354bdb96a0 gh-36627: CI Linux: Build the default platform in one job
> 407909de675 gh-36625: RSA primes must be odd (textbook code fix)
> 411b0007256 gh-36621: Build CI: Fix configuration of coverage upload action
> 34c4a783f90 gh-36619: `sage.combinat`: Update `# needs`
> 5151d130641 gh-36618: `sage.modular`: Update `# needs`, doctest cosmetics
> 6454751583c gh-36616: CI Linux: Increase max_parallel for `standard-pre`, 
> decrease for `standard`, `minimal-pre`
> 9f448dd44ad gh-36614: .github/workflows/doc-build-pdf.yml: Do not build 
> HTML documentation, fix upload of PDFs
> 6ea89459402 gh-36613: .github/workflows/dist.yml: Fix deprecation message
> 2df7af70dc9 gh-36612: Replace relative imports by absolute ones in 
> `sage.libs` except `.ntl`
> 31f1948f139 gh-36611: fix the links to msolve spkg
> a0b2ecdb2a3 gh-36609: avoid using `itertools.pairwise`
> 904519d50d5 gh-36608: some changes by ruff UP
> 5660360605d gh-36607: write Weyl with a capital letter
> 23f7eeb0002 gh-36606: ruff fix UP027 (list comprehension)
> b655bed0b17 gh-36605: Replace relative imports by absolute ones in 
> `sage.libs.ntl`
> 2230ce24fb1 gh-36604: Calculation of Maximum Leaf Number graph parameter
> 92b27f6bdfa gh-36601: Doc preview for all languages
> d0b1490658f gh-36600: Support giac 1.9.0-67
> d9868b59c33 gh-36598: Relativize header imports
> 1a2624f26c9 gh-36596: Replace relative imports by absolute ones in 
> `sage.{geometry,groups,numerical,plot}`
> 571320b289f gh-36595: Replace relative imports by absolute ones in 
> `sage.{coding,combinat,graphs}`
> 8b52cc35935 gh-36594: Replace relative imports by absolute ones in 
> `sage.{matrix,matroids,modules,stats}`
> a717ac0d024 gh-36593: some cleanup in free algebras
> 1950399d579 gh-36590: Allow to import `sage.cpython` module multiple times
> 46346a9bcb7 gh-36578: add an example of a divisor on a curve
> cae95572dca gh-36577: NetworkX: Allow version 3.2
> d48a8092c12 gh-36573: Replace relative imports by absolute ones in 
> structure
> f53e80835da gh-36571: Add method to check whether a (di)graph is geodetic
> bb7d1466482 gh-36569: `sage.matrix`, `sage.modules`: Update `# needs`
> e5b774dc629 gh-36568: `sage.manifolds`, `sage.tensor`: Update `# needs`
> 89f286c0806 gh-36567: `sage.numerical`: Update `# needs`
> e6c966219af gh-36565: Limit wait for slow mirrors
> 9c4a5718a3b gh-36563: 
> `pkgs/sagemath-{objects,categories,environment,repl}`: Move metadata from 
> `setup.cfg` to `pyproject.toml`
> 3ee8d4ec871 gh-36559: care for E702 in fast_arith.pyx
> 28111086e07 gh-36557: src/doc/en/developer: Describe static typing workflow
> 1a4599f5f2f gh-36556: some fixes for pycodestyle E221
> 4b52f1022b5 gh-36555: refresh the file cluster_algebra
> e48a5c19875 gh-36549: cleanup in number_field_element
> 8c93da94b61 gh-36548: Support a few more Cython system packages
> 1674ef85759 gh-36546: refine category of RAAGs
> 540e835eae7 gh-36544: Support networkx 3.2
> bfdbb632ce9 gh-36543: Cleanup conditional assert
> ff67b4425e4 gh-36517: `sage.misc.lazy_attribute`: Add typestub file for 
> pyright
> 41625b80277 gh-36477: fplll 5.4.5, fpylll 0.6
> bfc9c01c09b gh-36453: Exclude Cython 3.0.3
> 3de6e29ddc8 gh-36259: `sage.rings.padics`: Update `# needs`
> a901ccc0ebd gh-35269: Implement characteristic polynomial computation for 
> Drinfeld modules of any Rank
> 16dadc96d78 gh-35053: Added kth roots to Permutation
> eb8417b6107 (tag: 10.2.beta9) Updated SageMath version to 10.2.beta9
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/447ebaa1-85d7-47f8-9261-a72483e521een%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta4 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le lundi 25 septembre 2023 à 20:21:23 UTC+2, matthia...@gmail.com a écrit :

The real error is further up in the log file:

INFO: gcc -shared -Wl,-O1 -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions 
-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -g -fwrapv -O2 
-Wl,-rpath-link,/home/eric/sage/10.2/local/lib 
-L/home/eric/sage/10.2/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/home/eric/sage/10.2/local/lib 
-g -O2 build/temp.linux-x86_64-cpython-310/sage/rings/complex_arb.o 
-L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openblas-pthread/ -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu 
-lgmp -lflint -larb -lgsl -lm -lopenblas -lmpfr -o 
build/lib.linux-x86_64-cpython-310/sage/rings/
complex_arb.cpython-310-x86_64-linux-gnu.so -lpari
/usr/bin/ld : ne peut pas trouver -larb : Aucun fichier ou dossier de 
ce type
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
 
Check if "make sage_conf-no-deps" fixes this problem. 


Yes it fixed it! 
Thank you Matthias!

Eric. 

 

Background: On Debian/Ubuntu, this library is called flint-arb, and this 
information is passed to the build system via sage_conf. On incremental 
builds, sage_conf seems to sometimes disappear.



On Monday, September 25, 2023 at 10:12:26 AM UTC-7 egourg...@gmail.com 
wrote:

Thanks for the release. 
On Ubuntu 22.04, incremental build from Sage 10.2.beta3 failed with 

[sagelib-10.2.beta4] error: Command "gcc -shared -Wl,-O1 
-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -g -fwrapv -O2 
-Wl,-rpath-link,/home/eric/sage/10.2/local/lib 
-L/home/eric/sage/10.2/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/home/eric/sage/10.2/local/lib 
-g -O2 build/temp.linux-x86_64-cpython-310/sage/rings/complex_arb.o 
-L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openblas-pthread/ -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu 
-lgmp -lflint -larb -lgsl -lm -lopenblas -lmpfr -o 
build/lib.linux-x86_64-cpython-310/sage/rings/
complex_arb.cpython-310-x86_64-linux-gnu.so -lpari" failed with exit status 
1
[sagelib-10.2.beta4] error: subprocess-exited-with-error
...
***
Error building Sage.

The following package(s) may have failed to build (not necessarily
during this run of 'make all-start'):

* package: sagelib-10.2.beta4
  last build time: sept. 25 
18:33file:///home/eric/sage/10.2/sagelib-10.2.beta4.log
  log file:/home/eric/sage/10.2/logs/pkgs/sagelib-10.2.beta4.log

The file sagelib-10.2.beta4.log is here 
.

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/1a3bba6a-ff99-4af3-bfd7-36801aa5cc05n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta4 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Thanks for the release. 
On Ubuntu 22.04, incremental build from Sage 10.2.beta3 failed with 

[sagelib-10.2.beta4] error: Command "gcc -shared -Wl,-O1 
-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -g -fwrapv -O2 
-Wl,-rpath-link,/home/eric/sage/10.2/local/lib 
-L/home/eric/sage/10.2/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/home/eric/sage/10.2/local/lib 
-g -O2 build/temp.linux-x86_64-cpython-310/sage/rings/complex_arb.o 
-L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openblas-pthread/ -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu 
-lgmp -lflint -larb -lgsl -lm -lopenblas -lmpfr -o 
build/lib.linux-x86_64-cpython-310/sage/rings/complex_arb.cpython-310-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
 
-lpari" failed with exit status 1
[sagelib-10.2.beta4] error: subprocess-exited-with-error
...
***
Error building Sage.

The following package(s) may have failed to build (not necessarily
during this run of 'make all-start'):

* package: sagelib-10.2.beta4
  last build time: sept. 25 
18:33file:///home/eric/sage/10.2/sagelib-10.2.beta4.log
  log file:/home/eric/sage/10.2/logs/pkgs/sagelib-10.2.beta4.log

The file sagelib-10.2.beta4.log is here 
.

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/c3a7adaf-0365-46d7-b5c3-9bd3c24086e6n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta1 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le samedi 2 septembre 2023 à 18:14:53 UTC+2, emanuel.c...@gmail.com a 
écrit :

On Debian testing, :

   - 
   
   Upgrading 10.2.beta0 to beta0 to 10.2.beta1 fails by *repeatedly* 
   failing to create one 3D plot in the documentation (lost exact reference, 
   sorry…) ; rebuilding all documatation fails also.
   

On Ubuntu 22.04 (Python 3.10.12),  I also failed to build the documentation 
after upgrading form 10.2.beta0 to 10.2.beta1, even after running
make doc-clean doc-uninstall
The error message is

[sagemath_doc_html-none] Error building the documentation.
[sagemath_doc_html-none] Traceback (most recent call last):
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File "/usr/lib/python3.10/runpy.py", line 196, 
in _run_module_as_main
[sagemath_doc_html-none] return _run_code(code, main_globals, None,
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File "/usr/lib/python3.10/runpy.py", line 86, in 
_run_code
[sagemath_doc_html-none] exec(code, run_globals)
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File 
"/home/eric/sage/10.2/pkgs/sage-docbuild/sage_docbuild/__main__.py", line 
502, in 
[sagemath_doc_html-none] sys.exit(main())
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File 
"/home/eric/sage/10.2/pkgs/sage-docbuild/sage_docbuild/__main__.py", line 
499, in main
[sagemath_doc_html-none] builder()
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File 
"/home/eric/sage/10.2/pkgs/sage-docbuild/sage_docbuild/builders.py", line 
818, in _wrapper
[sagemath_doc_html-none] getattr(DocBuilder, build_type)(self, *args, 
**kwds)
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File 
"/home/eric/sage/10.2/pkgs/sage-docbuild/sage_docbuild/builders.py", line 
162, in f
[sagemath_doc_html-none] runsphinx()
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File 
"/home/eric/sage/10.2/pkgs/sage-docbuild/sage_docbuild/sphinxbuild.py", 
line 327, in runsphinx
[sagemath_doc_html-none] sys.stderr.raise_errors()
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File 
"/home/eric/sage/10.2/pkgs/sage-docbuild/sage_docbuild/sphinxbuild.py", 
line 263, in raise_errors
[sagemath_doc_html-none] raise OSError(self._error)
[sagemath_doc_html-none] OSError: WARNING: autodoc: failed to import module 
'multi_polynomial_libsingular' from module 'sage.rings.polynomial'; the 
following exception was raised:
[sagemath_doc_html-none] 
[sagemath_doc_html-none] Note: incremental documentation builds 
sometimes cause spurious
[sagemath_doc_html-none] error messages. To be certain that these are 
real errors, run
[sagemath_doc_html-none] "make doc-clean doc-uninstall" first and try 
again.

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/b2676631-eed5-41fa-afef-8be9645b35dfn%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.0.rc1 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le samedi 29 avril 2023 à 08:26:18 UTC+2, tdumont a écrit :


When upgrading from rc0 to rc1 (Debian testing) I got an error when 
building "manifolds" documentation: 


FWIW, I did the same (upgrading from rc0 to rc1) on Ubuntu 22.04 and did 
not get such an error.

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/a8469286-1df6-469c-8d93-a8093dbdf474n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0.beta7 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM, after make 
sagelib-clean sagelib-uninstall : 

1/  parallel (-j16) build terminated successully ("Sage build/upgrade 
complete!") but with many error messages while building the documentation:

[sagemath_doc_html-none] importlib.metadata.PackageNotFoundError: sage-conf
[sagemath_doc_html-none] Traceback (most recent call last):
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File 
"/home/eric/sage/10.0/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.8/bin/sage-config", 
line 33, in 
[sagemath_doc_html-none] sys.exit(load_entry_point('sage-conf', 
'console_scripts', 'sage-config')())
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File 
"/home/eric/sage/10.0/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.8/bin/sage-config", 
line 22, in importlib_load_entry_point
[sagemath_doc_html-none] for entry_point in 
distribution(dist_name).entry_points
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File "/usr/lib/python3.8/importlib/metadata.py", 
line 503, in distribution
[sagemath_doc_html-none] return 
Distribution.from_name(distribution_name)
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File "/usr/lib/python3.8/importlib/metadata.py", 
line 177, in from_name
[sagemath_doc_html-none] raise PackageNotFoundError(name)

2/ make ptestlong resulted in one failure:

sage -t --long --warn-long 65.9 
--random-seed=148710094003348085974082296997178566799 src/sage/env.py
**
File "src/sage/env.py", line 17, in sage.env
Failed example:
out == repr((SAGE_ROOT, SAGE_LOCAL))   
 # long time
Expected:
True
Got:
False
**

This is a permanent one. 
In case this is useful,  from Sage's shell (sage -sh)
echo $SAGE_ROOT $SAGE_LOCAL
returns
/home/eric/sage/10.0 /home/eric/sage/10.0/local

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/b631c05d-4e0c-4145-bf8f-2f50d658e4cen%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0.beta6 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le lundi 27 mars 2023 à 17:06:35 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :

make sagelib-clean sagelib-uninstall 
make


This solved the issue. 
Thank you Dima!

Eric. 
 


On Mon, 27 Mar 2023, 16:03 Eric Gourgoulhon,  wrote:

Le lundi 27 mars 2023 à 17:00:12 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :

Hi, 

On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Intel Core i7-8665U @1.9 GHz + 32 GB RAM, 
incremental parallel (-j8) build from Sage 10.0.beta4 failed while building 
the documentation. 
Running 
make doc-clean doc-uninstall
and then make again did not help. 
The issue seems to be in sage.geometry.integral_points;


This is the same error as reported by Emanuel, our messages being posted at 
almost the same time.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/a09cdcd1-d643-4b8d-a487-42875ebfdadfn%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0.beta6 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le lundi 27 mars 2023 à 17:00:12 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :

Hi, 

On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Intel Core i7-8665U @1.9 GHz + 32 GB RAM, 
incremental parallel (-j8) build from Sage 10.0.beta4 failed while building 
the documentation. 
Running 
make doc-clean doc-uninstall
and then make again did not help. 
The issue seems to be in sage.geometry.integral_points;


This is the same error as reported by Emanuel, our messages being posted at 
almost the same time. 
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/c3657cd3-da46-4f4b-a72e-f6ca8514f120n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0.beta6 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Hi, 

On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Intel Core i7-8665U @1.9 GHz + 32 GB RAM, 
incremental parallel (-j8) build from Sage 10.0.beta4 failed while building 
the documentation. 
Running 
make doc-clean doc-uninstall
and then make again did not help. 
The issue seems to be in sage.geometry.integral_points; the full error 
message is

[sagemath_doc_html-none] [discrete_] WARNING: error while formatting 
arguments for 
sage.geometry.integral_points.InequalityCollection.are_satisfied: 
'NoneType' object has no attribute 'find'
[sagemath_doc_html-none] [discrete_] WARNING: error while formatting 
arguments for 
sage.geometry.integral_points.InequalityCollection.satisfied_as_equalities: 
'NoneType' object has no attribute 'find'
[sagemath_doc_html-none] [discrete_] WARNING: error while formatting 
arguments for sage.geometry.integral_points.loop_over_parallelotope_points: 
'NoneType' object has no attribute 'find'
[sagemath_doc_html-none] [discrete_] WARNING: error while formatting 
arguments for sage.geometry.integral_points.parallelotope_points: 
'NoneType' object has no attribute 'find'
[sagemath_doc_html-none] [discrete_] WARNING: error while formatting 
arguments for sage.geometry.integral_points.ray_matrix_normal_form: 
'NoneType' object has no attribute 'find'
[sagemath_doc_html-none] [discrete_] WARNING: error while formatting 
arguments for sage.geometry.integral_points.simplex_points: 'NoneType' 
object has no attribute 'find'
[sagemath_doc_html-none] sage --docbuild --no-pdf-links 
reference/history_and_license inventory --no-prune-empty-dirs
[sagemath_doc_html-none] [discrete_] The inventory files are in 
../../local/share/doc/sage/inventory/en/reference/discrete_geometry.
[sagemath_doc_html-none] Error building the documentation.
[sagemath_doc_html-none] Traceback (most recent call last):
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File "/usr/lib/python3.10/runpy.py", line 196, 
in _run_module_as_main
[sagemath_doc_html-none] return _run_code(code, main_globals, None,
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File "/usr/lib/python3.10/runpy.py", line 86, in 
_run_code
[sagemath_doc_html-none] exec(code, run_globals)
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File 
"/home/eric/sage/10.0/pkgs/sage-docbuild/sage_docbuild/__main__.py", line 
498, in 
[sagemath_doc_html-none] sys.exit(main())
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File 
"/home/eric/sage/10.0/pkgs/sage-docbuild/sage_docbuild/__main__.py", line 
495, in main
[sagemath_doc_html-none] builder()
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File 
"/home/eric/sage/10.0/pkgs/sage-docbuild/sage_docbuild/builders.py", line 
819, in _wrapper
[sagemath_doc_html-none] getattr(DocBuilder, build_type)(self, *args, 
**kwds)
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File 
"/home/eric/sage/10.0/pkgs/sage-docbuild/sage_docbuild/builders.py", line 
163, in f
[sagemath_doc_html-none] runsphinx()
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File 
"/home/eric/sage/10.0/pkgs/sage-docbuild/sage_docbuild/sphinxbuild.py", 
line 327, in runsphinx
[sagemath_doc_html-none] sys.stderr.raise_errors()
[sagemath_doc_html-none]   File 
"/home/eric/sage/10.0/pkgs/sage-docbuild/sage_docbuild/sphinxbuild.py", 
line 263, in raise_errors
[sagemath_doc_html-none] raise OSError(self._error)
[sagemath_doc_html-none] OSError: WARNING: error while formatting arguments 
for sage.geometry.integral_points.InequalityCollection.are_satisfied: 
'NoneType' object has no attribute 'find'
[sagemath_doc_html-none] 
[sagemath_doc_html-none] Note: incremental documentation builds 
sometimes cause spurious
[sagemath_doc_html-none] error messages. To be certain that these are 
real errors, run
[sagemath_doc_html-none] "make doc-clean doc-uninstall" first and try 
again.

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/d6799d5f-ace2-4f5a-b203-e6a746b92486n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0.beta3 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Thank you for the release. 

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
-  build (-j16) from a fresh git clone and with system python (3.8.10): OK
- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"

Eric. 

Le vendredi 3 mars 2023 à 01:03:32 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit :

> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
>
> 46a6105bc49 (github/develop, tag: 10.0.beta3) Updated SageMath version to 
> 10.0.beta3
> a822a2132aa gh-35035: make _multiple_x_*() methods work for all n≠0
> 0847642dbb4 gh-35033: sage.schemes: Replace imports from sage.*.all for 
> namespace packages
> b6557a8a14b gh-35027: gitignore another (temporary) autoconf file
> c0cf5362055 gh-35025: Implement __getitem__ and alias weight methods for 
> quasimodular forms
> 35852961c31 gh-35024: fix usage of verbose with positional argument
> 932112f48ec gh-35023: Remove upstream urls from checksums.ini that point 
> to trac
> 61e845ceb8d gh-35021:  Implement check for Lorentzian polynomials #28252
> bf6c233980b gh-34995: Support for tachyon >= 0.99.2
> 23ab3802d1c gh-34961: qqbar.clear_denominators: crude but fast alternative 
> algorithm
> 52a81cbd161 Revert "add missing # optional - gap3"
> c017a6a3d68 add missing # optional - gap3
> 8f5bbd278ae (tag: 10.0.beta2) Updated SageMath version to 10.0.beta2
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/a0635497-24cd-4773-a653-393a7d5aa218n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le lundi 30 janvier 2023 à 13:59:27 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- incremental build (-j16) from 9.8.beta7, with system python (3.8.10): OK
- make ptestlong --> all tests passed except for 

sage -t --long --warn-long 66.8 
--random-seed=81878619703120460056743231466438357448 src/sage/env.py
**
File "src/sage/env.py", line 16, in sage.env
Failed example:
out == repr((SAGE_ROOT, SAGE_LOCAL))   
 # long time
Expected:
True
Got:
False
**
1 item had failures:
   1 of   6 in sage.env
[45 tests, 1 failure, 7.81 s]

This is a permanent failure. 

Running the doctests manually in a Sage console, I get

sage: out
"(None, '/home/eric/sage/9.8-develop/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.8')"
sage: repr((SAGE_ROOT, SAGE_LOCAL))
"('/home/eric/sage/9.8-develop', '/home/eric/sage/9.8-develop/local')"

hence the doctest failure. 

On another computer with Ubuntu 22.04 (instead of 20.04), the doctest is 
passed, 
since both out and repr((SAGE_ROOT, SAGE_LOCAL)) are
"('/home/eric/sage/9.8-develop', '/home/eric/sage/9.8-develop/local')"

Eric. 
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/c41b2fc1-ff06-4271-b5d7-1ad91c84c671n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- incremental build (-j16) from 9.8.beta7, with system python (3.8.10): OK
- make ptestlong --> all tests passed except for 

sage -t --long --warn-long 66.8 
--random-seed=81878619703120460056743231466438357448 src/sage/env.py
**
File "src/sage/env.py", line 16, in sage.env
Failed example:
out == repr((SAGE_ROOT, SAGE_LOCAL))   
 # long time
Expected:
True
Got:
False
**
1 item had failures:
   1 of   6 in sage.env
[45 tests, 1 failure, 7.81 s]

This is a permanent failure. 

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/bbd59b14-8425-4aeb-9065-6762a2c3bbf5n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta3 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Thanks for the new release. 

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- incremental build (-j16) from 9.8.beta2, with system python (3.8.10): OK
- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"

Eric.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/ebf13b7d-f00f-4669-9c69-578923077078n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.rc1 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- incremental build (-j16) from 9.7.rc0, with system python (3.8.10): OK
- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/c00ea943-a976-449c-a4c4-0a6e50842ed6n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.beta3 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Thanks for the new release.
On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:

- build (-j16) from a fresh git clone with system Python (3.8.10): OK (*)
- make ptestlong --> all tests passed except for 
src/sage/modular/overconvergent/hecke_series.py,
  due to https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34025

(*) the Ubuntu package python3-venv had to be installed for the system 
Python to be used, cf. 
https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/O2m5zNTVc1g/m/XeXc4kDGAwAJ

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/5f6db0b9-9c97-4499-975a-0e848cbd7989n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.beta2 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le vendredi 17 juin 2022 à 19:49:31 UTC+2, matthia...@gmail.com a écrit :

> On Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 5:56:46 AM UTC-7 egourg...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> this is the first version of Sage that refuses to use the system Python, 
>> which is 3.8.10. Although only Python 3.7 is officially dropped by this 
>> version, configure says:
>>  
>> checking for python3 >= 3.8.0, < 3.11.0 with modules sqlite3, ctypes, 
>> math, hashlib, crypt, socket, zlib, distutils.core, ssl, ensurepip... 
>> checking ... whether /usr/bin/python3 is good... no, the version is in 
>> the supported range but cannot import one of the required modules: sqlite3, 
>> ctypes, math, hashlib, crypt, socket, zlib, distutils.core, ssl, ensurepip
>>
>
>  You may need to install the package "python3-venv".
>

Indeed, this solves the issue, thanks!
After having installed python3-venv, I could build Sage 9.7.beta3 from a 
fresh git clone with the system Python (3.8.10). 
I've updated 
https://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr/install_ubuntu.html
accordingly. 

Eric.  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/1e5988fc-feba-4005-a27b-9b4eac40a65fn%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.beta2 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Thanks for the new release.
On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:

- incremental build (-j16) from Sage 9.7.beta1: OK (but see below)
- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"

Side note: this is the first version of Sage that refuses to use the system 
Python, which is 3.8.10. Although only Python 3.7 is officially dropped by 
this version, configure says: 
 
checking for python3 >= 3.8.0, < 3.11.0 with modules sqlite3, ctypes, math, 
hashlib, crypt, socket, zlib, distutils.core, ssl, ensurepip... 
checking ... whether /usr/bin/python3 is good... no, the version is in the 
supported range but cannot import one of the required modules: sqlite3, 
ctypes, math, hashlib, crypt, socket, zlib, distutils.core, ssl, ensurepip

Consequently, Python 3.10.3 was installed as a SPKG during Sage build. 

Eric. 


Le dimanche 12 juin 2022 à 15:16:00 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :

> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> a6e696e91d (tag: 9.7.beta2, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 
> 9.7.beta2
> b95c1659af Trac #33865: direct computation of .formal()[1] for 
> elliptic-curve morphisms
> f0068fad25 Trac #33244: sage.arith.misc.power_mod() works in any ring with 
> %, not just ZZ
> 9de47303c2 Trac #15426: Performance of casting ZZ[x] to Qp[x]
> 93619a4835 Trac #33959: some improvements in sandpile.py
> d31947813b Trac #33958: cleaning two files in graphs/
> f8cb451fb6 Trac #33954: partial pep cleanup for sandpile.py
> 2ae859211b Trac #33948: fix pycodestyle E306 in all pyx files
> 93c1512579 Trac #33944: saving a tikzpicture to a local folder is now 
> broken
> b99762ba0c Trac #33943: 1 doctest failing in oeis.py
> 7280939142 Trac #33937: finite-field .extension() sets up wrong coercion
> fed1e4e89a Trac #33935: simplify some super(something) to super() outside 
> of combinat
> 1ffc363fae Trac #33934: simplify some super(something) to super() inside 
> combinat/
> c7e0784afe Trac #33913: FPLLL 5.4.2 and FPyLLL 0.5.7
> 1551d4fa23 Trac #33885: Reference undefined - pdf documentation
> 06efaa3178 Trac #33879: Run pytest on github workflow for pytest related 
> tickets
> df2124f237 Trac #33822: python3 spkg-configure.m4: Require ensurepip
> 96a04a85fe Trac #33745: Create direct sum of matroids
> 4c932d04a3 Trac #32072: trace of zero fails in padic extensions
> 8d796b6441 Trac #29941: Modularization of sagelib: Break out separate 
> packages sagemath-environment, sagemath-repl
> f112639e6d Trac #24949: Bug in p-adic expansion over ramified extensions
> da5e1ac57d Trac #23575: Geometric Frobenius is broken
> 67e08a3876 Trac #33933: Remove quickref and tutorial from sage.combinat.all
> 9fdcb698e0 Trac #32137: Update ncurses to 6.3 and readline to 8.1.2
> 0947cd9036 Trac #33930: failing doctest involving polymake and number field
> 16c763 Trac #33924: pep cleanup for giac and gp pexpect interfaces
> 17438c198d Trac #33911: remove class inheritance of object in misc, repl, 
> libs
> 2537707a5f Trac #33852: bootstrap, src/doc/Makefile: Remove use of the 
> SAGE_ROOT/sage script
> b15c91d8ae Trac #33926: Fix tox-docker builds
> 4ec6965256 Trac #32631: Typo in random_element of polynomial rings
> 4d74388add Trac #33912: remove trailing spaces in combinat
> 881da74fb0 Trac #33903: remove deprecation in nonexact.py
> 578204f49d Trac #33899: some fixes in arxiv links
> 8b8f67a9ad Trac #33889: get rid of some range(0,*) in pyx files
> 8d8c044584 Trac #33691: some care for pep8 in pyx in modular
> fbf034fdb2 Trac #33557: FormalPolyhedraModule should check polyhedra for 
> dimension
> 9015204871 <(901)%20520-4871> Trac #31017: build/bin/sage-spkg-info: 
> Format dependencies file; remove redundant "dependencies" sections from 
> SPKG.rst
> f5e8c5997a Trac #33916: tweak tox.ini: activate more pycodestyle checks in 
> cython files
> 564609f061 Trac #33914: remove class inheritance of object in 
> rings,structure,numerical,doctests
> 3853878b0a Trac #33910: installing jupyterlab causes sagelib rebuild
> 4d66bc90bb Trac #33905: pep and other details in dynamics
> 603a833979 Trac #33901: sage-bootstrap-python doesn't work when pyenv 
> shadows all usable pythons in PATH
> 788281e061 Trac #33739: Migrate gitpod to conda
> c2ca6af620 Trac #33601: Documentation: Add 'furo' theme
> a340bda639 Trac #33544: Use language_level=3 for Cython everywhere
> fa1477350a Trac #32937: Drop Python 3.7 support in Sage 9.7
> a8c488f4a2 Trac #31937: Update markupsafe to 2.1.1, jinja2 to 3.1.2
> cda7f69354 Trac #33917: Avoid Python 3.10 syntax in doctest introduced in 
> #33799
> 70ec4e67ab Trac #25872: Modular decomposition bug
> 5fb2a6ea44 (tag: 9.7.beta1) Updated SageMath version to 9.7.beta1
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Thank you Volker for the release!

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- parallel build (-j16) from a fresh git clone, with system python 
(3.8.10): OK
- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/09c584fc-db49-4a0d-b843-c0774ab2c863n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.rc0 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Thanks for this release candidate!
On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:

- incremental build (-j16) from Sage 9.6.beta7 with system python (3.8.10): 
OK
- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/f84ad739-f43a-4994-b000-4f81c7e85c7fn%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta7 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Thanks for the new release.
On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:

- incremental build (-j16) from Sage 9.6.beta6 with system python (3.8.10): 
OK
- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/57325caa-b62c-4f55-a0db-860c8178aeb2n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta5 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:

- incremental build (-j16) from Sage 9.6.beta4 with system python (3.8.10): 
  first attempt failed in building Sage doc;
  running  "make doc-clean doc-uninstall" and make again lead to a 
successful build. 

- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/0e1d3634-afef-4188-8117-dd5f6ea603c1n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta3 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:

- incremental build (-j16) from Sage 9.6.beta2 with system python (3.8.10): 
OK
- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/959d19f8-d818-4728-9f6e-e72a51dbe572n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta2 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:

- incremental build (-j16) from Sage 9.6.beta1 with system python (3.8.10): 
OK
- make ptestlong  failed with 
sage -t --long --warn-long 70.3 
--random-seed=166484064187536079316870694317400346754 
src/sage/numerical/backends/logging_backend.py  # Killed due to abort
(details below)

When run standalone, the test is passed. 

Eric. 

sage -t --long --warn-long 70.3 
--random-seed=166484064187536079316870694317400346754 
src/sage/numerical/backends/logging_backend.py
Killed due to abort
**
Tests run before process (pid=158259) failed:
sage: from sage.numerical.backends.logging_backend import 
_format_function_call ## line 29 ##
sage: _format_function_call('foo', 17, hello='goodby') ## line 30 ##
"foo(17, hello='goodby')"
sage: sig_on_count() # check sig_on/off pairings (virtual doctest) ## line 
32 ##
0
sage: from sage.numerical.backends.generic_backend import get_solver ## 
line 44 ##
sage: from sage.numerical.backends.logging_backend import _make_wrapper, 
LoggingBackend ## line 45 ##
sage: backend = get_solver(solver='GLPK') ## line 46 ##
sage: w = _make_wrapper(backend, 'ncols') ## line 47 ##
sage: logging_backend = LoggingBackend(backend) ## line 48 ##
sage: w(logging_backend) ## line 49 ##
# p.ncols()
# result: 0
0
sage: sig_on_count() # check sig_on/off pairings (virtual doctest) ## line 
53 ##
0
sage: import sage.numerical.backends.logging_backend ## line 100 ##
sage: from sage.numerical.backends.logging_backend import LoggingBackend ## 
line 101 ##
sage: from sage.numerical.backends.generic_backend import get_solver ## 
line 102 ##
sage: b = get_solver(solver = "GLPK") ## line 103 ##
sage: lb = LoggingBackend(backend=b) ## line 104 ##
sage: lb.add_variable(obj=42, name='Helloo') ## line 105 ##
# p.add_variable(obj=42, name='Helloo')
# result: 0
0
sage: lb.add_variable(obj=1789) ## line 109 ##
# p.add_variable(obj=1789)
# result: 1
1
sage: sig_on_count() # check sig_on/off pairings (virtual doctest) ## line 
115 ##
0
sage: import sage.numerical.backends.logging_backend ## line 124 ##
sage: from sage.numerical.backends.logging_backend import LoggingBackend ## 
line 125 ##
sage: from sage.numerical.backends.generic_backend import get_solver ## 
line 126 ##
sage: b = get_solver(solver = "GLPK") ## line 127 ##
sage: lb = LoggingBackend(backend=b) ## line 128 ##
sage: sig_on_count() # check sig_on/off pairings (virtual doctest) ## line 
129 ##
0
sage: import sage.numerical.backends.logging_backend ## line 146 ##
sage: from sage.numerical.backends.logging_backend import LoggingBackend ## 
line 147 ##
sage: from sage.numerical.backends.generic_backend import get_solver ## 
line 148 ##
sage: b = get_solver(solver = "GLPK") ## line 149 ##
sage: lb = LoggingBackend(backend=b) ## line 150 ##
sage: lb.print_ranges ## line 151 ##
>
sage: sig_on_count() # check sig_on/off pairings (virtual doctest) ## line 
153 ##
0
sage: import sage.numerical.backends.logging_backend ## line 179 ##
sage: from sage.numerical.backends.logging_backend import LoggingBackend ## 
line 180 ##
sage: from sage.numerical.backends.generic_backend import get_solver ## 
line 181 ##
sage: b = get_solver(solver = "GLPK") ## line 182 ##
sage: lb = LoggingBackend(backend=b) ## line 183 ##
sage: lb.base_ring() ## line 184 ##
Real Double Field
sage: from sage.rings.rational_field import QQ ## line 186 ##
sage: lb = LoggingBackend(backend=b, base_ring=QQ) ## line 187 ##
sage: lb.base_ring() ## line 188 ##
Rational Field
sage: sig_on_count() # check sig_on/off pairings (virtual doctest) ## line 
190 ##
0
sage: def compute_something(solver='GLPK'):
from sage.numerical.mip import MIPSolverException
mip = MixedIntegerLinearProgram(solver=solver)
lb = mip.get_backend()
lb.add_variable(obj=42, name='Helloo')
lb.add_variable(obj=1789)
try:
lb.solve()
except MIPSolverException:
return 4711
else:
return 91 ## line 253 ##
sage: import sage.numerical.backends.logging_backend ## line 269 ##
sage: from sage.numerical.backends.logging_backend import 
LoggingBackendFactory ## line 270 ##
sage: compute_something(solver = LoggingBackendFactory(solver='GLPK')) ## 
line 271 ##
# p = get_solver(solver='GLPK')
# p.add_variable(obj=42, name='Helloo')
# result: 0
# p.add_variable(obj=1789)
# result: 1
# p.solve()
# exception: GLPK: The LP (relaxation) problem has no dual feasible solution
4711
sage: fname = tmp_filename() ## line 292 ##
sage: compute_something(solver = LoggingBackendFactory(solver='GLPK', 
printing=False,
 doctest_file=fname)) ## 
line 293 ##
4711
sage: with open(fname) as f:
for line in f.readlines(): _ = sys.stdout.write('|{}'.format(line)) ## 
line 296 ##
|sage: p = get_solver(solver='GLPK')
|sage: p.add_variable(obj=42, name='Helloo')
|0
|sage: 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta1 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:

- incremental build (-j16) from Sage 9.6.beta0 with system python (3.8.10) 
failed with the error:
[sagemath_doc_html-none] ImportError: libflint.so.15: cannot open shared 
object file: No such file or directory
Running "make sagelib-clean" as suggested by Matthias fixed it, allowing 
for a successful build

- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"

Eric. 



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/56853992-fdd6-47e6-ac9e-e08b3bdedb31n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta0 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- parallel build (-j16) from a fresh git clone, with system python 
(3.8.10): OK
- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/cee8fea4-f3ee-4049-b503-80fdc3de9399n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Thank you Volker for the release!

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- parallel build (-j16) from a fresh git clone, with system python 
(3.8.10): OK
- make ptestlong: passed, except for 2 doctests in 
src/sage/game_theory/parser.py
This failure is the lrslib issue dealt with in 
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33101

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/962f64b0-84a8-403c-9bc0-a9637d71588en%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: after edit the sage library, sage -b now tells "Nothing to (re)build / all up-to-date."

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

This is fixed in Sage 9.5.rc1, cf. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33130

Eric.
Le vendredi 14 janvier 2022 à 15:44:15 UTC+1, Sébastien Labbé a écrit :

> With 9.5.rc0, I modify a file in the sage library, then
>
> $ sage -b
> Nothing to (re)build / all up-to-date.
>
> does nothing. This is a new behavior. But it seems my modications are 
> being considered, so it is okay.
>
> From where does this change in behavior come from?
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/2c7fbb57-b8e1-4102-93d4-be9d3e2b7995n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le vendredi 14 janvier 2022 à 11:54:23 UTC+1, Sébastien Labbé a écrit :

> On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 10:10:00 AM UTC+1 egourg...@gmail.com 
> wrote:
>
>> This is a permanent failure:
>> sage -t --long --warn-long 67.0 
>> --random-seed=127661401430613686989226810121136436198 
>> src/sage/game_theory/parser.py
>>
>
> A ticket exists for this issue: 
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33101 
>

Indeed! Thanks for pointing it out.

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/672d91d7-55a8-4d07-91f9-c2cfb851b3e3n%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le vendredi 14 janvier 2022 à 11:00:31 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :

>
> is this system-wide lrslib? 
>

Yes this is from Ubuntu package lrslib 0.70-3.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/2e1101de-5016-4faf-ad95-57d7a3158614n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- incremental build (-j16) from 9.5.beta8, with system python (3.8.10): OK
- make ptestlong --> 2 doctests failed in src/sage/game_theory/parser.py

This is a permanent failure:

sage -t --long --warn-long 67.0 
--random-seed=127661401430613686989226810121136436198 
src/sage/game_theory/parser.py
**
File "src/sage/game_theory/parser.py", line 75, in 
sage.game_theory.parser.Parser.format_lrs
Failed example:
lrs_output[:-2]# 
optional - lrslib
Expected:
[...,
 '2  0  1  2 \n',
 '1  1/2  1/2 -2 \n',
 '\n',
 '2  0  1  2 \n',
 '1  0  1 -2 \n',
 '\n',
 '*Number of equilibria found: 2\n',
 '*Player 1: vertices=3 bases=3 pivots=5\n',
 '*Player 2: vertices=2 bases=1 pivots=6\n',
 '\n']
Got:
['*lrsnash:lrslib v.7.0 2018.7.1(64bit,lrsgmp.h,hybrid arithmetic) gmp 
v.6.1\n',
 '2  0  1  2 \n',
 '1  1/2  1/2 -2 \n',
 '\n',
 '2  0  1  2 \n',
 '1  0  1 -2 \n',
 '\n',
 '*Number of equilibria found: 2\n',
 '*Player 1: vertices=3 bases=3 pivots=5\n',
 '*Player 2: vertices=2 bases=1 pivots=6\n',
 '\n',
 '*lrsnash:lrslib v.7.0 2018.7.1(64bit,lrsgmp.h,hybrid arithmetic)\n']
**

On another Ubuntu 20.04 computer, but with lrslib not installed, no error 
is reported, certainly because the doctest is skipped due to the marker 
"optional - lrslib".

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/fa6a174e-357a-4119-8eea-f22b28735997n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc0 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Hi Volker,

Thank you for this release. 
Would it be possible to include 
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30362 
in the next rc if any? This ticket has been in positive review state for 17 
days; it introduces symplectic structures on manifolds and it would be nice 
if Sage 9.5 is shipped with them. Thank you. 

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/e8918304-abee-4c6b-a623-ff993e920544n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta8 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Hi Volker, 

Le dimanche 12 décembre 2021 à 15:19:57 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit :

>
> We should probably make a release some time soon... if you have anything 
> that you want to get into 9.5 then get it polished now ;)
>

Could you please merge  https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30362 ?
It introduces symplectic structures on manifolds and could have many 
applications.
Thank you!,

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/cce554b8-c270-4362-b086-b315576e4308n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta8 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- incremental build (-j16) from 9.5.beta7, with system python (3.8.10): OK
- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/c0436c77-3334-489f-81a7-f366ccc83b86n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta7 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- incremental build (-j16) from 9.5.beta6, with system python (3.8.10): OK
- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/d233fa96-eb09-480e-9bc1-43b2ec99a584n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta6 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- incremental build (-j16) from 9.5.beta5, with system python (3.8.10): OK
- make ptestlong results in 1 failure:

**
File "src/sage/plot/plot.py", line 1782, in sage.plot.plot.plot
Failed example:
plot(f, (x, -3.5, 3.5), detect_poles='show', exclude=[-3..3], ymin=-5, 
ymax=5)
Expected:
Graphics object consisting of 12 graphics primitives
Got:
Graphics object consisting of 13 graphics primitives
**

Strangely, the test is passed when run standalone:

./sage -t --long src/sage/plot/plot.py
Running doctests with ID 2021-11-16-11-30-56-31426e61.
Git branch: develop
Using 
--optional=build,debian,dochtml,pip,sage,sage.geometry.polyhedron,sage.rings.real_double,sage_spkg
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long --warn-long 66.6 
--random-seed=321008040313156700460941679315322569825 src/sage/plot/plot.py
[461 tests, 61.81 s]
--
All tests passed!
--
Total time for all tests: 61.9 seconds
cpu time: 58.9 seconds
cumulative wall time: 61.8 seconds

I am wondering how can one have 13 graphics primitives in ptestlong and 12 
in standalone mode...

Eric. 




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/5c5d1b72-f7fd-43bd-a69a-846359f59f39n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta3 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- incremental build (-j16) from 9.5.beta2, with system python (3.8.10): OK
- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/1fab2b65-edab-4301-a85a-6e3632648e91n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta2 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- incremental build (-j16) from 9.5.beta1, with system python (3.8.10): OK
- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"

Eric.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/12a346d9-4afa-41f8-a06f-3837a73622b6n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta1 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- incremental build from 9.5.beta0, with system python (3.8.10): OK
- make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!"

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/3614c18e-d731-4b35-85f2-fefff7203452n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta0 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Intel Core i7-8665U with 16 TB of RAM:

- build from a fresh git clone and using system Python (3.8.10):  OK
- make ptestlong: OK ("All tests passed!")

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/c1e27e44-fdee-4e8b-b5e8-83b6072832cfn%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Issue with sage-9.3-Ubuntu_20.04-x86_64.tar.bz2

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Hi all,

I've just noticed that when running ./sage immediately after unpacking 
sage-9.3-Ubuntu_20.04-x86_64.tar.bz2 on a freshly installed Ubuntu 20.04.2 
system, one gets the error message

/usr/bin/python: not found

The issue is immediately fixed by installing the Ubuntu package 
python-is-python3, which simply provides a symlink from /usr/bin/python to 
/usr/bin/python3.
Since the package python-is-python3 is not installed by default in Ubuntu 
20.04, this certainly perturb new users. 

Could this be fixed when preparing the Ubuntu binaries for Sage 9.4 ? 
If not, python-is-python3 should be mentioned as a prerequisite for 
installing Sage binary on the download page. 

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/f12b9c12-cd8e-4160-9585-e800c4b67b0en%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.3 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Thank you Volker!

Le lundi 10 mai 2021 à 23:24:54 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :

> The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-9.3. As always, you can 
> get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, 
> the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
>
> d6c5cd9be7 (tag: 9.3, trac/master, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version 
> to 9.3
> 3f4547f2cc Trac #31624: fedora-34-standard: eclib, singular, ipykernel 
> build failures with system ntl, zeromq
> c27d4d6803 (tag: 9.3.rc5) Updated SageMath version to 9.3.rc5
>
>
> PS: if you were too fast and downloaded the typoed 9.4 then please rebase 
> on 9.3 ;-)
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/f6b8b131-f163-47f7-a0e8-578020ed7b54n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.3.rc1 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Thanks for this release. Would it be possible to merge the positively 
reviewed ticket
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31536
in the next rc? 
This ticket

- fixes the blocker https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31513
- fixes the %matplotlib notebook magic, which is broken in a %display latex 
context in Sage 9.2
- performs some code improvement regarding the handling of MathJax
- has been quite tested with Jupyter notebooks involving various types of 
Sage objects, Matplotlib objects and ipywidgets, so that it should be 
pretty safe to merge it  (although we cannot pretend to exhaustivity).

Thank you.

Eric.
Le mardi 30 mars 2021 à 22:41:40 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :

> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 
>
> a89f81d778 (tag: 9.3.rc1, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.3.rc1
> 6e084f9dba Trac #31521: numpy build broken with SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes
> 2c25f07cfd (tag: 9.3.rc0) Updated SageMath version to 9.3.rc0
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/8e3510a5-533a-47d5-b1c1-b96de8466af4n%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.3.beta2 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le mercredi 25 novembre 2020 à 14:02:06 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :

> this one? 
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30945 
>
>
Yes, exactly. 

On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 12:59 PM Eric Gourgoulhon 
>  wrote: 
> > 
> > 
> > Le mercredi 25 novembre 2020 à 13:35:31 UTC+1, Sébastien Labbé a écrit : 
> >> 
> >> On Ubuntu 18.04, running tests with various optional and external 
> packages, I get: 
> >> 
> >> Using 
> --optional=4ti2,cbc,ccache,cryptominisat,database_jones_numfield,debian,dot2tex,e_antic,external,fricas,glucose,latte_int,libnauty,lidia,lrslib,memlimit,normaliz,notedown,pandoc_attributes,pip,pycosat,pynormaliz,rst2ipynb,sage,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sage_spkg
>  
>
> >> -- 
> >> sage -t --long --warn-long 56.3 --random-seed=0 
> src/sage/interfaces/singular.py # Killed due to segmentation fault 
> >> -- 
> >> External software detected for doctesting: 
> ffmpeg,graphviz,imagemagick,internet,latex,octave,pandoc 
> >> 
> >> I can reproduce it when running the command: 
> >> sage -t --long --warn-long 73.3 --random-seed=0 
> src/sage/interfaces/singular.py 
> > 
> > 
> > I confirm the seg fault on Ubuntu 20.04 (Sage 9.3.beta2 built with the 
> system Python = 3.8.5, but with Sage's singular = 4.1.1p2). 
> > On the same computer (Intel Core i7-8665U + 32 GB RAM), the issue is 
> already there with Sage 9.2, but not with Sage 9.1. 
> > 
> > Eric. 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "sage-release" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to sage-release...@googlegroups.com. 
> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/16154ebe-6c36-4527-812c-da25a299b0e8n%40googlegroups.com.
>  
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/fede8b3c-92e7-438b-820b-2d61adf8291en%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.3.beta2 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le mercredi 25 novembre 2020 à 13:35:31 UTC+1, Sébastien Labbé a écrit :

> On Ubuntu 18.04, running tests with various optional and external 
> packages, I get:
>
> Using 
> --optional=4ti2,cbc,ccache,cryptominisat,database_jones_numfield,debian,dot2tex,e_antic,external,fricas,glucose,latte_int,libnauty,lidia,lrslib,memlimit,normaliz,notedown,pandoc_attributes,pip,pycosat,pynormaliz,rst2ipynb,sage,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sage_spkg
> --
> sage -t --long --warn-long 56.3 --random-seed=0 
> src/sage/interfaces/singular.py  # Killed due to segmentation fault
> --
> External software detected for doctesting: 
> ffmpeg,graphviz,imagemagick,internet,latex,octave,pandoc
>
> I can reproduce it when running the command:
> sage -t --long --warn-long 73.3 --random-seed=0 
> src/sage/interfaces/singular.py
>

I confirm the seg fault on Ubuntu 20.04 (Sage 9.3.beta2 built with the 
system Python = 3.8.5, but with Sage's singular = 4.1.1p2).
On the same computer (Intel Core i7-8665U + 32 GB RAM), the issue is 
already there with Sage 9.2, but not with Sage 9.1.

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/16154ebe-6c36-4527-812c-da25a299b0e8n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.rc0 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le mercredi 7 octobre 2020 à 16:40:16 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :

> On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Intel Core i7-8665U + 32 GB RAM:
>
> - incremental build (-j8) from 9.2.beta14 with system Python (=3.8.2): OK
> - all tests from ptestlong passed, except for 
>
> sage -t --long --warn-long 74.5 --random-seed=0 
> src/sage/quadratic_forms/quadratic_form__equivalence_testing.py
> **
> File "src/sage/quadratic_forms/quadratic_form__equivalence_testing.py", 
> line 90, in 
> sage.quadratic_forms.quadratic_form__equivalence_testing.is_globally_equivalent_to
> Failed example:
> Q.is_globally_equivalent_to(P)
> Expected:
> False
> Got:
> True
> **
> 1 item had failures:
>1 of  21 in 
> sage.quadratic_forms.quadratic_form__equivalence_testing.is_globally_equivalent_to
> [69 tests, 1 failure, 0.27 s]
>
> This error is persistent (i.e. still occurs when the test is run 
> standalone) and was not there in 9.2.beta14.
> It has also been reported for this release with Ubuntu 20.04 in 
> https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/0MnZQYItCYc/m/6ks32lnXAAAJ
>
>
This doctest failure is due to a bug in the system Pari (2.11.2 in Ubuntu 
20.04); it has been fixed in Pari 2.11.4,  which is now shipped with Sage, 
cf. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27749. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/360f7822-d2b9-40bc-a7bc-23e6a789e0cdn%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.rc0 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Intel Core i7-8665U + 32 GB RAM:

- incremental build (-j8) from 9.2.beta14 with system Python (=3.8.2): OK
- all tests from ptestlong passed, except for 

sage -t --long --warn-long 74.5 --random-seed=0 
src/sage/quadratic_forms/quadratic_form__equivalence_testing.py
**
File "src/sage/quadratic_forms/quadratic_form__equivalence_testing.py", 
line 90, in 
sage.quadratic_forms.quadratic_form__equivalence_testing.is_globally_equivalent_to
Failed example:
Q.is_globally_equivalent_to(P)
Expected:
False
Got:
True
**
1 item had failures:
   1 of  21 in 
sage.quadratic_forms.quadratic_form__equivalence_testing.is_globally_equivalent_to
[69 tests, 1 failure, 0.27 s]

This error is persistent (i.e. still occurs when the test is run 
standalone) and was not there in 9.2.beta14.
It has also been reported for this release with Ubuntu 20.04 in 
https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/0MnZQYItCYc/m/6ks32lnXAAAJ

Besides, the run of ptestlong generated the same Ubuntu crash reports 
regarding nauty and mwrank as those reported in
https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/6RLsvBKi84I/m/PscGzDefCgAJ

Eric.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/5b75303c-0341-4a87-9eb4-6ce05197f7d2n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta14 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Intel Core i7-8665U + 32 GB RAM:
- incremental build (-j8) from 9.2.beta13 with system Python (=3.8.2): OK
- all tests from ptestlong passed

Although make ptestlong reports "All tests passed!", two Ubuntu crash 
reports have been generated during the ptestlong run:
1/ Title: nauty-gentourng crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main()
 nauty-gentourng is from the Ubuntu package nauty 2.6r10+ds-1ubuntu1
2/ Title: mwrank crashed with SIGABRT in std::terminate()
 mwrank is from the Ubuntu package eclib-tools 20190909-2build2

Eric.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/2c22f391-22be-480a-92cb-8862ddbfcd14n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta13 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM 
computer: 

  - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.2.beta12: OK 
  - make ptestlong: all tests passed.

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/dfea7e5e-1e13-4ce6-97a3-57acabcba5fbn%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le mercredi 16 septembre 2020 à 19:05:59 UTC+2, Samuel Lelievre a écrit :

>
> Recommendations of packages to install can still be improved,
> see the dedicated ticket:
>
>   https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29586
>
> but we need to balance the maintenance effort with the gains.
>

Indeed! 

>
> In this case, what you can conclude is:
>
> - satisfactory versions of these packages (or possibly packages
>   that depend on them) for that OS were not found
> - on some version of that OS, satisfactory versions of these
>   packages exist that would avoid having to build them
>
> and what we should do about it is probably adapt the wording
> to better convey that. For instance:
>
> hint: installing the following system packages, if not already
> present, is recommended and may avoid building some SPKGs from
> source (though some may have to be built anyway):
>

+1

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/9f452b23-c5c2-4080-9c32-d443d3cc533en%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le mercredi 16 septembre 2020 à 11:59:40 UTC+2, vdelecroix a écrit :

> Le 16/09/2020 à 11:51, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : 
> > Side note: the launch of Sage in a terminal is very fast on this 
> computer, 
> > less then 2 seconds. Maybe this is due to the use of the system Python? 
>
> On my computer, I have 3 sage with the following startup times 
> * conda (Sage 9.1, Python 3.7.8): around 1.3secs 
> * system (Sage 9.1, Python 3.8.5): around 1.3secs 
> * built from source (9.2.beta11, Python 3.7.3): around 1.5secs 
>

I was speaking about a cold start, i.e. starting Sage for the first time 
after login to the computer. 
For such starts, I was used to get about 10 or even 20 s, rather  than 1 s. 
For hot starts, it is indeed about 1 s. 

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/cdc57dc3-b0cc-44be-8ae1-b4c636738950n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Intel Core i7-8665U + 32 GB RAM:

- build (-j8) from a fresh git clone with a maximum of system packages 
(details below), including the system Python (3.8.2): OK
- all tests from ptestlong passed

Details of build:
As recommended in 
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/source.html#prerequisites,  
the following Ubuntu 20.04 packages were installed before the build:

sudo apt-get install bc binutils bzip2 ca-certificates cliquer curl 
eclib-tools fflas-ffpack flintqs g++ g++ gcc gcc gfan gfortran git 
glpk-utils gmp-ecm lcalc libatomic-ops-dev libboost-dev libbraiding-dev 
libbrial-dev libbrial-groebner-dev libbz2-dev libcdd-dev libcdd-tools 
libcliquer-dev libcurl4-openssl-dev libec-dev libecm-dev libffi-dev 
libflint-arb-dev libflint-dev libfreetype6-dev libgd-dev libgf2x-dev 
libgivaro-dev libglpk-dev libgmp-dev libgsl-dev libiml-dev liblfunction-dev 
liblrcalc-dev liblzma-dev libm4rie-dev libmpc-dev libmpfi-dev libmpfr-dev 
libncurses5-dev libntl-dev libopenblas-dev libpari-dev libpcre3-dev 
libplanarity-dev libppl-dev libpython3-dev libreadline-dev librw-dev 
libsqlite3-dev libsuitesparse-dev libsymmetrica2-dev libz-dev libzmq3-dev 
libzn-poly-dev m4 make nauty palp pari-doc pari-elldata pari-galdata 
pari-galpol pari-gp2c pari-seadata patch perl pkg-config planarity ppl-dev 
python3 python3 python3-distutils r-base-dev r-cran-lattice sqlite3 sympow 
tachyon tar xz-utils yasm

Then, after running 
make configure
./configure 
I've installed some supplementary packages as recommended in the outcome of 
configure:

sudo apt-get install coinor-cbc coinor-libcbc-dev libcdd-dev libcdd-tools 
cmake libisl-dev libnauty-dev ninja-build libxml-libxslt-perl 
libxml-writer-perl libxml2-dev libperl-dev libfile-slurp-perl libjson-perl 
libsvg-perl libterm-readkey-perl libterm-readline-gnu-perl libmongodb-perl 
libterm-readline-gnu-perl

I then ran
./config.status --recheck && ./config.status
which yielded the following recommendation:
configure: hint: installing the following system packages is recommended 
and may avoid building some of the above SPKGs from source:
configure:   $ sudo apt-get update 
  $ sudo apt-get install libcdd-dev libcdd-tools libnauty-dev

However these packages are already installed in the system:

sudo apt-get install libcdd-dev libcdd-tools libnauty-dev
Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait
Construction de l'arbre des dépendances   
Lecture des informations d'état... Fait
Note : sélection de « libnauty2-dev » au lieu de « libnauty-dev »
libcdd-dev est déjà la version la plus récente (094j-2).
libcdd-tools est déjà la version la plus récente (094j-2).
libnauty2-dev est déjà la version la plus récente (2.6r10+ds-1ubuntu1).
Le paquet suivant a été installé automatiquement et n'est plus nécessaire :
  libfprint-2-tod1
Veuillez utiliser « sudo apt autoremove » pour le supprimer.
0 mis à jour, 0 nouvellement installés, 0 à enlever et 2 non mis à jour.

Finally, I ran
MAKE="make -j8" make
and the build proceeded smoothly. 

Side note:  the launch of Sage in a terminal is very fast on this computer, 
less then 2 seconds. Maybe this is due to the use of the system Python? 

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/2e0ce63b-0dd4-4d5a-b4fe-35cac6bde2d7n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM 
computer: 

  - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.2.beta6: OK 
  - make ptestlong: all tests passed.

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/de334f21-5500-40d8-92d9-b12fe52bcde6n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Hi,

Le lundi 7 septembre 2020 à 07:21:19 UTC+2, matthia...@gmail.com a écrit :

>
> ubuntu-bionic-standard (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/1078907737 
> 
> ):
>   [dochtml]   UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xe2 in 
> position 2661: ordinal not in range(128)
>   [dochtml] Full log file: logs/dochtml.log
> Makefile:1874: recipe for target 'doc-html' failed
>

For the record, I did not experience such an issue on my Ubuntu Bionic 
(18.04) machine: the incremental build from Sage 9.2.beta11 went well, 
including for doc-html. 

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/9bc0df00-a176-4530-8751-b01390e25842n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta7 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le mardi 4 août 2020 08:54:54 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
>
> Of note : I lost the ability to launch the Jupyter notebook, as reported 
> in Trac#30123  ; the make build 
> workaround doesn’t work around this bug anymore.
>
Indeed. But as mentioned in 
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30123#comment:8, if you restore the broken 
symlinks in SAGE_ROOT/local/share/jupyter/nbextensions, the Jupyter 
notebook works again.

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/a06d3f0f-6bb6-4838-902a-2b5210951070o%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta7 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

A workaround is proposed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30123#comment:8

Le lundi 3 août 2020 15:16:42 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
>
>
>
> Le lundi 3 août 2020 14:46:51 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
>>
>> ISTR that make build may unhose you, even if sage -b is (temporarily ?) 
>> broken.
>>
>
> Thanks for your suggestion. Unfortunately, "make build" did not help (same 
> error message). 
>
> Eric.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/25f0be98-6eea-4887-abfb-379bf1b28829o%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta7 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le lundi 3 août 2020 14:46:51 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
>
> ISTR that make build may unhose you, even if sage -b is (temporarily ?) 
> broken.
>

Thanks for your suggestion. Unfortunately, "make build" did not help (same 
error message). 

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/8558c7eb-3b5c-4470-9ac7-241b33eac84fo%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta7 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Upgrading from Sage 9.2.beta6, the Jupyter notebook is broken: opening a 
notebook results in a blank page, with the following error message in the 
console:

[W 12:43:20.344 NotebookApp] 404 GET 
/nbextensions/mathjax/MathJax.js?config=TeX-AMS-MML_HTMLorMML-full,Safe=configured
 
(127.0.0.1) 11.99ms referer=http://localhost:/notebooks/SM_Kerr.ipynb

This is certainly https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30123, but this time the 
"sage -b" trick mentioned in 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/mWTD0_iBwKc/qZkOCqhgBgAJ did not 
work. 

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/842b9cc5-3559-4666-8b24-a142e82eab6bo%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta3 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Hi,

Le mercredi 8 juillet 2020 00:56:55 UTC+2, Justin C. Walker a écrit :
>
>
> So today, I dutifully did the same thing (for beta3).  However, once 
> getting the repository in place, there was no “./configure”. 
>
>
You should run

make configure

first. In other words, the full build process from scratch is

git clone https://github.com/sagemath/sage.git
cd sage
make configure
./configure
MAKE="make -j8" make

Best wishes,

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/a4b9943b-f46c-42e0-88c8-d452b27231d6o%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta2 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer:

  - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.2.beta1 after export LANG=C.UTF-8: 
OK
  - all tests from ptestlong passed

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/931b96c8-b09f-403e-a769-e2d14463a3c5o%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le vendredi 22 mai 2020 21:17:42 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :
>
> Binaries are now on their way to the mirrors!
>

Thanks. What about the binaries for Windows? Some users are asking for them 
on ask.sagemath and apparently, they are not yet on the mirrors.

Eric. 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/e96b2a55-ef9b-47cd-ad1d-542d4617bda1%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.beta7 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer:

  - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.1.beta6: OK
  - all tests from ptestlong passed

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/24ecd7e8-1fa8-49a4-b43a-c0a86ad2a67f%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.beta6 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer:

  - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.1.beta5: OK
  - all tests from ptestlong passed

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/cd439202-724a-4bf9-b058-0b648e3ae9c8%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.beta5 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer:

  - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.1.beta4: OK
  - all tests from ptestlong passed

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/fa39e496-1c03-4daa-9c92-4c49c56e6c13%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.beta4 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer:

  - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.1.beta3: OK 
  - make ptestlong reports the same failure as with 9.1.beta3:

sage -t --long --warn-long 53.7 src/sage/groups/cubic_braid.py  # 1 doctest 
failed

Details in the attached log of the 9.1.beta3 message:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-release/xxEfql2Isgg/LzglNX04FQAJ

As with 9.1.beta3, the test is passed when run standalone.

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/ee851fbc-f552-4832-ada6-8044de9a6c8a%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.beta2 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer:

  - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.1.beta1: OK 
  - all tests from ptestlong passed 

Eric

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/d1fbcc4c-ed6a-4382-a6d0-4639204d6b6c%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.beta1 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer:

  - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.1.beta0: OK 
  - all tests from ptestlong passed 

Eric


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/6f0ed587-5c8c-41f2-beaf-69badb121a34%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.beta0 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer:

  - build (with -j16) from a fresh git clone + pull develop: OK 
  - all tests from ptestlong passed 

Eric

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/cf676832-f42b-4fd2-8d7f-4f28c43f1edb%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Thank you very much Volker!
And congratulations to all people who made the Python 3 switch possible, 
especially to Frédéric Chapoton!
Happy New Year!

Eric.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/79758626-7802-4807-a8a1-87ab74ac32b0%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.rc1 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le mardi 31 décembre 2019 09:40:06 UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
>
> I have problems when building R 3.6.2 on my (usually rather stable) Ubuntu 
> patchbot.
>

Which version of Ubuntu? I could build R 3.6.2 without any trouble on 
Ubuntu 18.04, with the system BLAS (i.e. the Ubuntu package libblas-dev is 
installed on my system).

Best wishes,

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/3943a4d6-9227-45f0-ac35-fb8a34888440%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.rc1 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on Core i7-6700HQ + 16 GB RAM:
- incremental build (-j8) from 9.0.rc0 OK
- all tests from ptestlong passed, except for a transient failure:
sage -t --long --warn-long 86.4 src/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py  # 2 
doctests failed
This is the same error as that already reported for Sage 9.0.beta10. It did 
not occur while ptesting Sage 9.0.rc0 on the same computer and shows up 
here again. Anyway, the error is transient: the test is passed when run 
standalone. 

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/7c53bf12-702d-428d-b2ef-94e36351bc55%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.rc0 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on Core i7-6700HQ + 16 GB RAM:
- incremental build (-j8) from 9.0.beta10 OK
- all tests from ptestlong passed

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/13552465-4af9-4035-9719-97897a861fe7%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.beta10 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le mardi 24 décembre 2019 18:03:53 UTC+1, John Cremona a écrit :
>
> On behalf of all Sage users and deleopers I would like to thank Volker for 
> all his efforts over yet another year as release manager.  Your work is 
> much appreciated 
>

+1 
Thank you Volker!

Here is my report:

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on Core i7-6700HQ + 16 GB RAM:
- incremental build (-j8) from 9.0.beta9 OK
- all tests from ptestlong passed, except for a transient failure (reported 
by Emmanuel as well):
sage -t --long --warn-long 80.9 src/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py  # 2 
doctests failed
(details are attached)
The test is passed when run standalone.

Best wishes,

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/b85c78ef-f8ad-4c9c-a568-5c2764b67661%40googlegroups.com.
sage -t --long --warn-long 80.9 src/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py
**
File "src/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py", line 38, in sage.modular.ssmod.ssmod
Failed example:
t = X.T(2).matrix()# long time (21s on sage.math, 2011)
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
"/home/eric/sage/py3/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sage/modular/hecke/hecke_operator.py",
 line 749, in matrix
return self.__matrix
  File "sage/structure/element.pyx", line 487, in 
sage.structure.element.Element.__getattr__ 
(build/cythonized/sage/structure/element.c:4609)
return self.getattr_from_category(name)
  File "sage/structure/element.pyx", line 500, in 
sage.structure.element.Element.getattr_from_category 
(build/cythonized/sage/structure/element.c:4718)
return getattr_from_other_class(self, cls, name)
  File "sage/cpython/getattr.pyx", line 394, in 
sage.cpython.getattr.getattr_from_other_class 
(build/cythonized/sage/cpython/getattr.c:2614)
raise AttributeError(dummy_error_message)
AttributeError: 'sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_zz_pex.Polynomial_ZZ_pEX' 
object has no attribute 'dimension'

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
"/home/eric/sage/py3/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sage/doctest/forker.py", 
line 681, in _run
self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
  File 
"/home/eric/sage/py3/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sage/doctest/forker.py", 
line 1123, in compile_and_execute
exec(compiled, globs)
  File "", line 1, in 
t = X.T(Integer(2)).matrix()# long time (21s on sage.math, 
2011)
  File 
"/home/eric/sage/py3/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sage/modular/hecke/hecke_operator.py",
 line 751, in matrix
self.__matrix = self.parent().hecke_matrix(self.__n, *args, **kwds)
  File 
"/home/eric/sage/py3/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sage/modular/hecke/algebra.py",
 line 528, in hecke_matrix
return self.__M.hecke_matrix(n, *args, **kwds)
  File 
"/home/eric/sage/py3/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py",
 line 827, in hecke_matrix
SS, II = self.supersingular_points()
  File 
"/home/eric/sage/py3/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py",
 line 705, in supersingular_points
T2_matrix[pos, j] += ej
  File "sage/matrix/matrix0.pyx", line 970, in 
sage.matrix.matrix0.Matrix.__getitem__ 
(build/cythonized/sage/matrix/matrix0.c:7311)
raise IndexError("matrix index out of range")
IndexError: matrix index out of range
**
File "src/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py", line 39, in sage.modular.ssmod.ssmod
Failed example:
t.nrows()  # long time
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
"/home/eric/sage/py3/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sage/doctest/forker.py", 
line 681, in _run
self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
  File 
"/home/eric/sage/py3/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sage/doctest/forker.py", 
line 1123, in compile_and_execute
exec(compiled, globs)
  File "", line 1, in 
t.nrows()  # long time
NameError: name 't' is not defined
**
1 item had failures:
   2 of  17 in sage.modular.ssmod.ssmod
[79 tests, 2 failures, 4.34 s]

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta9 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer:

  - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.0.beta8: OK 
  - all tests from ptestlong passed 

Eric

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/763f7052-ab7b-4507-896a-484f3342f90c%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta8 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer:

  - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.0.beta7: OK 
  - all tests from ptestlong passed 

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/41128ee7-d268-4c42-9a6e-a817f90a0105%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer:

  - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.0.beta6: OK 
  - all tests from ptestlong passed 

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/7377f5c3-9e4d-4b1e-a107-14b7d28c3362%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta6 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer:

  - default (i.e. Python 3) build with -j16 from a fresh git clone + pull 
develop OK 
  - all tests from ptestlong passed 

Eric.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/487447c0-892b-462c-b266-57536a41e3df%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta5 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer 
and for a *python3 *build:

  - incremental build (from 9.0.beta4, with -j16) OK 
  - all tests from ptestlong passed 

Eric.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/9b67fa20-a6f2-47c4-b99c-8d1bbe41b88d%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: [sage-support] Changelog for Sage?

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Regarding the "digest summary of important major changes" asked by this 
user, maybe it is time to reactivate #22176 
 ?

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/42e68486-3545-45b7-b42e-cab1c03d58c6%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta4 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer 
and for a *python3 *build:

  - incremental build (from 9.0.beta3, with -j16) OK 
  - all tests from ptestlong passed 

This is the first time that Python-3 Sage passes all the tests on this 
computer! (thanks to the inclusion of #28334 and #28622 in this release). 

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/d0bcd55f-16b4-484e-9c27-95999c60c0b4%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta3 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM and for a 
*python3 
*build:

  - incremental build (from 9.0.beta2, with -j16) OK 
  - tests from ptestlong passed, except for 

--
sage -t --long --warn-long 51.1 
src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx  # 1 doctest failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 51.1 src/sage/repl/attach.py  # 4 doctests failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 51.1 src/sage/libs/singular/function.pyx  # 1 
doctest failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 51.1 
src/sage/numerical/backends/generic_backend.pyx  # 2 doctests failed
--

Hopefully, these failures are fixed by
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28334 

and
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28622 

which should be merged in Sage 9.0.beta4.

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/926fd271-5173-4699-a4ad-a66a849f113e%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Ubuntu binaries for Sage 8.9?

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le lundi 21 octobre 2019 00:33:57 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :
>
> Ubuntu 18.04 binaries are now up!
>


Thank you very much!

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/be69af74-d155-4634-bd94-d9665f7e9678%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta1 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM:


*- python2: *

  - incremental build (from 9.0.beta0, with -j16) OK 
  - all tests from ptestlong passed

- 
*python3: *

  - incremental build (from 9.0.beta0, with -j16) OK 
  - tests from ptestlong passed, except for 

--
sage -t --long --warn-long 51.0 
src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx  # 1 doctest failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 51.0 src/sage/repl/attach.py  # 4 doctests failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 51.0 src/sage/libs/singular/function.pyx  # 1 
doctest failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 51.0 
src/sage/numerical/backends/generic_backend.pyx  # 2 doctests failed
--

The first one is permanent and is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28334
The last three ones are passed run standalone and are tracked at 
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28622.

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/01fdcdeb-be8f-4e50-ae42-2da30dc76249%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Ubuntu binaries for Sage 8.9?

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

May I ask about the Ubuntu 18.04 binaries?
Some users are complaining about the lack of them:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-support/UBOR-iAq_VY/PTOwaVt2CQAJ
or are downloading the unique Ubuntu binary available (for 16.04) and are 
facing a crash since they are running Ubuntu 18.04: 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-support/w-OFC21Llmw/eW2JqBdCCAAJ
Thanks for your help. 

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/025953fa-eaee-4666-8703-b7db409f13f5%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Ubuntu binaries for Sage 8.9?

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le samedi 12 octobre 2019 15:35:44 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :
>
> I just copied the Ubuntu 16.04 binaries. The buildbot was having some dns 
> problems so the binaries are late.  
>
>  
Thank you Volker!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/65c5e118-f526-47b9-b47a-3eccc912ea51%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Ubuntu binaries for Sage 8.9?

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Hi,

There are no Ubuntu 18.04 binaries for Sage 8.9 on the mirrors listed at 
http://www.sagemath.org/download-linux.html,
while there are binaries for Debian since September 30. Is there any issue 
in producing these binaries? 
(having a look at http://build.sagemath.org/, it seems that Ubuntu builded 
are in "building" or " retry" state).
Can I help somehow?

Eric.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/d3733124-b0fb-427c-8426-3cb00f120ee2%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta0 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM:


*- python2: *

  - build (with -j16) from a fresh git clone + pull develop OK 
  - all tests from ptestlong passed

- 
*python3: *

  - incremental build (from 8.9, with -j16) OK 

  - tests from ptest-python3 passed, except for 1 permanent failure in 
   src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx 
   this is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28334

  - tests from ptestlong passed, except for 

--
sage -t --long --warn-long 52.1 
src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx  # 1 doctest failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 52.1 src/sage/repl/attach.py  # 4 doctests failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 52.1 src/sage/libs/singular/function.pyx  # 1 
doctest failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 52.1 
src/sage/numerical/backends/generic_backend.pyx  # 2 doctests failed
--

  The failed doctests are those tracked at 
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28298 

  The doctests in the last three files are passed when run standalone, 
while that in the first file is permanent (cf. the ptest-python3 report)
 
Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/e52d514f-4b4d-49c1-81f7-f55bd2150449%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.rc0 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM:


*- python2: *

  - incremental build (from 8.9.beta9, with -j16) OK 
  - all tests from ptestlong passed

- 
*python3: *

  - incremental build (from 8.9.beta9, with -j16) OK 

  - tests from ptest-python3 passed, except for 1 permanent failure in 
   src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx 
   this is the error tracked at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28334

  - tests from ptestlong passed, except for 

--
sage -t --long --warn-long 52.6 src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py  # 1 
doctest failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 52.6 
src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx  # 1 doctest failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 52.6 src/sage/repl/attach.py  # 4 doctests failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 52.6 src/sage/libs/singular/function.pyx  # 1 
doctest failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 52.6 
src/sage/numerical/backends/generic_backend.pyx  # 2 doctests failed
--

  The failed doctests are those tracked at 
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28298 

  The files
   - src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py
   - src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx
  have permanent failures, while
  - src/sage/repl/attach.py
  - src/sage/libs/singular/function.pyx
  - src/sage/numerical/backends/generic_backend.pyx
  have only failed doctests that pass when run standalone. 
 
Eric. 




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/153973d4-2804-4bc2-988f-01df0cca3259%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta9 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM:


*- python2: *

  - incremental build (from 8.9.beta8, with -j16) OK 
  - all tests from ptestlong passed

- 
*python3: *

  - incremental build (from 8.9.beta8, with -j16) OK 

  - tests from ptest-python3 passed, except for 
- 1 permanent failure in 
   src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx 
   this is the error tracked at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28334
- 1 transient (i.e. passed when run standalone) failure in 
   src/sage/interfaces/psage.py
   (cf. the attached log)

   - tests from ptestlong passed, except for a rather short list now:

--
sage -t --long --warn-long 53.7 
src/sage/combinat/root_system/weyl_group.py  # 7 doctests failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 53.7 src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py  # 1 
doctest failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 53.7 
src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx  # 1 doctest failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 53.7 src/sage/repl/attach.py  # 4 doctests failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 53.7 src/sage/libs/singular/function.pyx  # 1 
doctest failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 53.7 
src/sage/numerical/backends/generic_backend.pyx  # 2 doctests failed
--

  The failed docstests are those tracked at 
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28298
  The last three ones, which are denoted respectively by (J), (H) and 
(I) in #28298, are passed when run standalone. 
  The other ones (i.e. the first three lines in the above list) are 
permanent on this computer.

Eric. 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/f9cf32cd-5e45-4e21-8f5e-8eab7f496773%40googlegroups.com.
sage -t --long --warn-long 51.7 src/sage/interfaces/psage.py
**
File "src/sage/interfaces/psage.py", line 75, in 
sage.interfaces.psage.PSage._repr_
Failed example:
PSage()   # indirect doctest
Expected:
A running non-blocking (parallel) instance of Sage (number ...)
Got:
deleting
kill -9 20711
deleting
kill -9 20754
deleting
kill -9 20767
Exception ignored in: 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
"/home/eric/sage/py3/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sage/interfaces/psage.py",
 line 117, in __del__
Sage.__del__(self)
AttributeError: type object 'Sage' has no attribute '__del__'
Exception ignored in: 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
"/home/eric/sage/py3/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sage/interfaces/psage.py",
 line 117, in __del__
Sage.__del__(self)
AttributeError: type object 'Sage' has no attribute '__del__'
Exception ignored in: 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
"/home/eric/sage/py3/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sage/interfaces/psage.py",
 line 117, in __del__
Sage.__del__(self)
AttributeError: type object 'Sage' has no attribute '__del__'
A running non-blocking (parallel) instance of Sage (number 3)
**
1 item had failures:
   1 of   3 in sage.interfaces.psage.PSage._repr_
[6 tests, 1 failure, 4.80 s]

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta8 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Hi Volker, 

Le lundi 26 août 2019 00:37:50 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :
 

> 40c5efa0c8 Trac #28365: Use something instead of time() to ensure Manifold 
> uniqueness in tests
>


Although it appears in the list of 8.9.beta8 merged tickets,  #28365 
 has not been closed. 

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/33359dfb-590c-4b26-9a60-292dbc977d7c%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta8 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM:


*- python2: *

  - incremental build (from 8.9.beta4, with -j16) OK 
  - all tests from ptestlong passed

- 
*python3: *

  - incremental build (from 8.9.beta4, with -j16) OK 
  - tests from ptest-python3 passed, except for 1 permanent failure in 
src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx 
this is the error tracked at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28334

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/ae5a1464-c34f-4df1-82f8-a4e41eaf55b7%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta8 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Le lundi 26 août 2019 00:37:50 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :
>
> I'm inclined to name the next version 9.0. In particular, we now have 
> Python 3 support that, while not perfect, is at least usable so we should 
> mark that with a new major version. Also point-9 is a natural place to 
> switch. If you want to voice your opinion on that issue: now is the time ;-)
>

+1 

Eric. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/8a406894-ff4c-4386-8c30-f66cf548692c%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta7 released

[Eric Gourgoulhon]

Hello Sebastien,

This works for me on Ubuntu 18.04, with both Python 2 and 3 versions of 
Sage 8.9.beta7.
Maybe you should upgrade your SSL?

Best regards,

Eric. 

Le vendredi 23 août 2019 14:56:24 UTC+2, Sébastien Labbé a écrit :
>
>
> > I did my upgrade as usual, so I do not know where is the problem from. 
>> Am I alone to have this issue? Should I upgrade SSL or something? 
>>
>> This works for me on Debian buster, what OS are you on? And, is it 
>> python 2 or 3? 
>>
>>
> I am running Ubuntu 16.04 with this:
> ┌┐
> │ SageMath version 8.9.beta7, Release Date: 2019-08-18   │
> │ Using Python 2.7.15. Type "help()" for help.   │
> └┘
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/76126b7d-f58c-46f5-bd65-a6db19add287%40googlegroups.com.