Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.rc1 released

[Dima Pasechnik]

note that gap_package installed alters code paths of GAP code which might
not even depend explicitly on it.


On Thu, 12 Aug 2021, 17:07 Emmanuel Charpentier, <
emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry for the late answer...
>
> Le lundi 9 août 2021 à 18:16:23 UTC+2, Samuel Lelievre a écrit :
>
>> 2021-08-09 12:00 UTC, Emmanuel Charpentier:
>> >
>> > On Debian testing running on core i5 + 8 GB RAM,
>> > upgrading 9.4.rc0 to 9.4.rc1 and running ptestlong
>> > gives three permanent failures :
>> >
>> > sage -t --long --warn-long 92.9 --random-seed=0
>> src/sage/doctest/test.py # 7 doctests failed
>> > sage -t --long --warn-long 92.9 --random-seed=0
>> src/sage/tests/cmdline.py # 2 doctests failed
>> > sage -t --long --warn-long 92.9 --random-seed=0
>> src/sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py # 3 doctests failed
>> >
>> > As far as I can tell now, these failures are identical to those already
>> reported for a couple previous releases.
>>
>> Regarding the last one, I opened
>>
>> - Sage Trac ticket 32294
>> Fix failing doctests in groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py
>> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32294
>>
>> Is it the same doctests as in that ticket you see failing?
>>
>
> Yep. But on another system (Debian testing running on core I7 + 16 GB RAM)
> it passes. Go figure...
>
> It seems to depend on atmospheric pressure and temperature, phase of the
> moon AND Dow Jones closing...
>
>
>> Do you have any optional packages installed?
>>
>
> Yep : cmdstanpy cypari2 dot2tex fricas gap_jupyter gap_package iniconfig
> json5 jupyter_kernel_gap jupyter_kernel_singular kenzo libsemigroups pandas
> pycodestyle pyflakes pysingular pytest python_dateutil pyyaml relint saclib
> sagemath_standard singular_jupyter tqdm ujson
>
>
>> Can you reproduce on a fresh clone?
>>
>
> I'll have to install a new tree...
>
>
>> I observed the doctest failures on Debian 10 "buster"
>> for Sage with many optional packages installed. That Sage
>> was built a few releases ago, and those tests have been
>> failing for a while on it, including after upgrading to 9.4.rc1.
>>
>> On the same machine, another Sage, also with many optional
>> packages, but installed from a fresh clone more recently,
>> passed those doctests, both for Sage 9.4.rc0 and Sage 9.4.rc1.
>>
>> I guess I should inspect the config.log files to try and spot
>> the key difference between these two Sage installations.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-release" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/94a41093-7ca7-4894-8d28-bb9e540e5fb8n%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq0OY9Z%2B7deYYT6i9S-j1R0Ufkf_Wp5YgP6Fq%2BaSEKDApQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.rc1 released

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

Sorry for the late answer...

Le lundi 9 août 2021 à 18:16:23 UTC+2, Samuel Lelievre a écrit :

> 2021-08-09 12:00 UTC, Emmanuel Charpentier: 
> > 
> > On Debian testing running on core i5 + 8 GB RAM, 
> > upgrading 9.4.rc0 to 9.4.rc1 and running ptestlong 
> > gives three permanent failures : 
> > 
> > sage -t --long --warn-long 92.9 --random-seed=0 src/sage/doctest/test.py 
> # 7 doctests failed 
> > sage -t --long --warn-long 92.9 --random-seed=0 
> src/sage/tests/cmdline.py # 2 doctests failed 
> > sage -t --long --warn-long 92.9 --random-seed=0 
> src/sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py # 3 doctests failed 
> > 
> > As far as I can tell now, these failures are identical to those already 
> reported for a couple previous releases. 
>
> Regarding the last one, I opened 
>
> - Sage Trac ticket 32294 
> Fix failing doctests in groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py 
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32294 
>
> Is it the same doctests as in that ticket you see failing? 
>

Yep. But on another system (Debian testing running on core I7 + 16 GB RAM) 
it passes. Go figure...

It seems to depend on atmospheric pressure and temperature, phase of the 
moon AND Dow Jones closing...
 

> Do you have any optional packages installed? 
>

Yep : cmdstanpy cypari2 dot2tex fricas gap_jupyter gap_package iniconfig 
json5 jupyter_kernel_gap jupyter_kernel_singular kenzo libsemigroups pandas 
pycodestyle pyflakes pysingular pytest python_dateutil pyyaml relint saclib 
sagemath_standard singular_jupyter tqdm ujson 
 

> Can you reproduce on a fresh clone? 
>

I'll have to install a new tree...
 

> I observed the doctest failures on Debian 10 "buster" 
> for Sage with many optional packages installed. That Sage 
> was built a few releases ago, and those tests have been 
> failing for a while on it, including after upgrading to 9.4.rc1. 
>
> On the same machine, another Sage, also with many optional 
> packages, but installed from a fresh clone more recently, 
> passed those doctests, both for Sage 9.4.rc0 and Sage 9.4.rc1. 
>
> I guess I should inspect the config.log files to try and spot 
> the key difference between these two Sage installations.  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/94a41093-7ca7-4894-8d28-bb9e540e5fb8n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.rc1 released

[Matthias Köppe]

The problem on opensuse-tumbleweed is fixed 
by https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32368, *needs review*.

On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 12:51:32 PM UTC-7 Matthias Köppe wrote:

> Thanks, Volker, for the latest release candidate.
>
> We still have problems on the following platforms:
>
> - *opensuse-tumbleweed (*https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/3274952722*): 
> *Errors building *cypari, ecm, singular*
> - *conda-forge*: Multiple problems, as noted earlier
> - *fedora-34:* (fixed by https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32359, *needs 
> review*)
> - *centos-7-i386 (*https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/3274952890
> *):  SIGFPE* while building dochtml
>
> Also there remain *race conditions* in Python package installation - 
> fixed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32361 (*needs review*)
>
> As we are preparing notes on platform support for 
> https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.4, it would be good to know 
> about the status of Apple Silicon (M1) support (
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30592).
>
>
> On Sunday, August 8, 2021 at 3:06:04 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote:
>
>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
>> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
>> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 
>>
>>
>> e0cbf2c965 (tag: 9.4.rc1, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 
>> 9.4.rc1
>> 952f7f9006 Trac #31565: Build still non-portable despite 
>> SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes because of numpy
>> 5090d3dab1 Trac #32322: Random failure in projective_ds.py
>> a73ad2437f Trac #32142: Implement the alternating central extension of 
>> the Onsager Lie algebra
>> d81cacb611 Trac #32006: Fix links in tutorial bibliography
>> bd073b49ba (tag: 9.4.rc0) Updated SageMath version to 9.4.rc0
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/f02bc815-646c-431e-9858-66bbff35cd2an%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.rc1 released

[Matthias Köppe]

Thanks, Volker, for the latest release candidate.

We still have problems on the following platforms:

- *opensuse-tumbleweed (*https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/3274952722*): 
*Errors building *cypari, ecm, singular*
- *conda-forge*: Multiple problems, as noted earlier
- *fedora-34:* (fixed by https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32359, *needs 
review*)
- *centos-7-i386 (*https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/3274952890
*):  SIGFPE* while building dochtml

Also there remain *race conditions* in Python package installation - fixed 
in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32361 (*needs review*)

As we are preparing notes on platform support for 
https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.4, it would be good to know 
about the status of Apple Silicon (M1) support 
(https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30592).


On Sunday, August 8, 2021 at 3:06:04 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote:

> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 
>
>
> e0cbf2c965 (tag: 9.4.rc1, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.4.rc1
> 952f7f9006 Trac #31565: Build still non-portable despite 
> SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes because of numpy
> 5090d3dab1 Trac #32322: Random failure in projective_ds.py
> a73ad2437f Trac #32142: Implement the alternating central extension of the 
> Onsager Lie algebra
> d81cacb611 Trac #32006: Fix links in tutorial bibliography
> bd073b49ba (tag: 9.4.rc0) Updated SageMath version to 9.4.rc0
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/da66ed60-cc35-4d17-b25e-aa8d09974949n%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.rc1 released

[Matthias Köppe]

I have opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32359 for this -- clearly a 
blocker for Sage 9.4

On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 5:32:26 AM UTC-7 enriqu...@gmail.com wrote:

> I have the develop version installed in two computers with Fedora 34. On 
> one of them, the update was successful, but in the second one, since it did 
> not start I erased the installation and clone the git repository again. 
> This is the result:
>
> Checking whether SageMath should install SPKG gp2c... 
> checking whether any of pari is installed as or will be installed as 
> SPKG... no 
> configure: gp prefix is /usr 
> configure: error: using system pari and unable to locate pari.cfg
>
> I have no clue why this happens. Thanks, Enrique.
>
>
> El lunes, 9 de agosto de 2021 a las 0:06:04 UTC+2, Volker Braun escribió:
>
>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
>> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
>> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 
>>
>>
>> e0cbf2c965 (tag: 9.4.rc1, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 
>> 9.4.rc1
>> 952f7f9006 Trac #31565: Build still non-portable despite 
>> SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes because of numpy
>> 5090d3dab1 Trac #32322: Random failure in projective_ds.py
>> a73ad2437f Trac #32142: Implement the alternating central extension of 
>> the Onsager Lie algebra
>> d81cacb611 Trac #32006: Fix links in tutorial bibliography
>> bd073b49ba (tag: 9.4.rc0) Updated SageMath version to 9.4.rc0
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/c551d5a4-93c5-4808-a82e-898f684cbd0cn%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.rc1 released

[Enrique Artal]

I have the develop version installed in two computers with Fedora 34. On 
one of them, the update was successful, but in the second one, since it did 
not start I erased the installation and clone the git repository again. 
This is the result:

Checking whether SageMath should install SPKG gp2c... 
checking whether any of pari is installed as or will be installed as 
SPKG... no 
configure: gp prefix is /usr 
configure: error: using system pari and unable to locate pari.cfg

I have no clue why this happens. Thanks, Enrique.


El lunes, 9 de agosto de 2021 a las 0:06:04 UTC+2, Volker Braun escribió:

> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 
>
>
> e0cbf2c965 (tag: 9.4.rc1, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.4.rc1
> 952f7f9006 Trac #31565: Build still non-portable despite 
> SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes because of numpy
> 5090d3dab1 Trac #32322: Random failure in projective_ds.py
> a73ad2437f Trac #32142: Implement the alternating central extension of the 
> Onsager Lie algebra
> d81cacb611 Trac #32006: Fix links in tutorial bibliography
> bd073b49ba (tag: 9.4.rc0) Updated SageMath version to 9.4.rc0
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/ffadeeb9-e44e-4ae8-8c9a-e6f7f5018db6n%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.rc1 released

[Samuel Lelièvre]

2021-08-09 12:00 UTC, Emmanuel Charpentier:
>
> On Debian testing running on core i5 + 8 GB RAM,
> upgrading 9.4.rc0 to 9.4.rc1 and running ptestlong
> gives three permanent failures :
>
> sage -t --long --warn-long 92.9 --random-seed=0 src/sage/doctest/test.py  # 7 
> doctests failed
> sage -t --long --warn-long 92.9 --random-seed=0 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py  # 
> 2 doctests failed
> sage -t --long --warn-long 92.9 --random-seed=0 
> src/sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py  # 3 doctests failed
>
> As far as I can tell now, these failures are identical to those already 
> reported for a couple previous releases.

Regarding the last one, I opened

- Sage Trac ticket 32294
  Fix failing doctests in groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py
  https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32294

Is it the same doctests as in that ticket you see failing?
Do you have any optional packages installed?
Can you reproduce on a fresh clone?

I observed the doctest failures on Debian 10 "buster"
for Sage with many optional packages installed. That Sage
was built a few releases ago, and those tests have been
failing for a while on it, including after upgrading to 9.4.rc1.

On the same machine, another Sage, also with many optional
packages, but installed from a fresh clone more recently,
passed those doctests, both for Sage 9.4.rc0 and Sage 9.4.rc1.

I guess I should inspect the config.log files to try and spot
the key difference between these two Sage installations.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAEcArF2Ljc-ohu1TiRW3V9dedQJbA0cOuLnoONQQUQzaCkBs4g%40mail.gmail.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.rc1 released

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

On Debian testing running on core i5 + 8 GB RAM, upgrading 9.4.rc0 to 
9.4.rc1 and running ptestlong give three permanent failures :

sage -t --long --warn-long 92.9 --random-seed=0 src/sage/doctest/test.py  # 7 
doctests failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 92.9 --random-seed=0 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py  # 2 
doctests failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 92.9 --random-seed=0 
src/sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py  # 3 doctests failed

As far as I can tell now, these failures are identical to those already 
reported for a couple previous releases.

HTH,
​
Le lundi 9 août 2021 à 00:06:04 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :

> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 
>
>
> e0cbf2c965 (tag: 9.4.rc1, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.4.rc1
> 952f7f9006 Trac #31565: Build still non-portable despite 
> SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes because of numpy
> 5090d3dab1 Trac #32322: Random failure in projective_ds.py
> a73ad2437f Trac #32142: Implement the alternating central extension of the 
> Onsager Lie algebra
> d81cacb611 Trac #32006: Fix links in tutorial bibliography
> bd073b49ba (tag: 9.4.rc0) Updated SageMath version to 9.4.rc0
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/d346b72a-2fa7-404f-b591-57b51a0316a0n%40googlegroups.com.