[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta1 released
2021-09-14 22:50:30 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> c349c87d0d (tag: 9.5.beta1, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to
> 9.5.beta1
>
Thanks for this new release.
In Cygwin 3.2.0 in Windows 10:
```bash
$ export MAKE='make -j4' && ./bootstrap -q && ./configure -q && make -s V=0
&& make -s V=0 ptestlong
...
--
sage -t --long --warn-long 251.2 --random-seed=0 src/sage/misc/persist.pyx
# 1 doctest failed
--
Total time for all tests: 10096.3 seconds
cpu time: 32053.6 seconds
cumulative wall time: 59597.3 seconds
Pytest is not installed, skip checking tests that rely on it.
make: *** [Makefile:201: ptestlong] Error 1
$ ./sage -t --long -a --failed
Running doctests with ID 2021-09-22-10-35-59-a9965c51.
Git branch: develop
Using --optional=build,cygwin,dochtml,pip,sage,sage_spkg
Doctesting entire Sage library.
Only doctesting files that failed last test.
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long --warn-long 278.3 --random-seed=0 src/sage/misc/persist.pyx
**
File "src/sage/misc/persist.pyx", line 1018, in sage.misc.persist.picklejar
Failed example:
if uid==0:
raise OSError('You must not run the doctests as root, geez!')
elif sys.platform == 'cygwin':
raise OSError("This won't always behave on Cygwin depending on
permission handling configuration.")
else:
sage.misc.persist.picklejar(1, dir + '/noaccess')
Expected:
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
PermissionError: ...
Got:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/home/s/sage9h/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/sage/doctest/forker.py",
line 704, in _run
self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs)
File
"/home/s/sage9h/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/sage/doctest/forker.py",
line 1098, in compile_and_execute
exec(compiled, globs)
File "", line 4, in
raise OSError("This won't always behave on Cygwin depending on
permission handling configuration.")
OSError: This won't always behave on Cygwin depending on permission
handling configuration.
**
1 item had failures:
1 of 10 in sage.misc.persist.picklejar
[139 tests, 1 failure, 11.17 s]
--
sage -t --long --warn-long 278.3 --random-seed=0 src/sage/misc/persist.pyx
# 1 doctest failed
--
Total time for all tests: 12.0 seconds
cpu time: 1.3 seconds
cumulative wall time: 11.2 seconds
Pytest is not installed, skip checking tests that rely on it.
```
That failure is already addressed at:
Sage Trac ticket 32514
Fix file permission doctest in src/sage/misc/persist.pyx
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32514
so hopefully the next beta can pass all tests in Cygwin! --Samuel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/7f1b76b9-ac6f-4170-8991-98aae2e896a2n%40googlegroups.com.
Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta1 released
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 8:53 PM Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > So far : > > 9.5.beta1 “naked” passes ptestlong without any failure ; > 9.5.beta1 +Fricas fails the single fricas limit doctest ; > reinstalling the other optional packages entails the same failures as > reported above. > > The problem is that I do not know which optional package is responsible for > which failure. The problem us compunded by the absence of a (documented) way > to uninstall a given package. make -clean should remove > > Suggestions ? > > Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 19:50:00 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : >> >> One more data point : ptestlong running on the “naked” 9.1.beta1 + Fricas >> gives the single limit failure. >> >> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 16:22:26 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : >>> >>> Data point : reinstalling Fricas gets me the `plusInfinity()/+Infinity` >>> failure in `src/sage/calculus/calculus.py` >>> >>> HTH, >>> >>> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 16:15:30 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 15:11:33 UTC+2, axio…@yahoo.de a écrit : > > I opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32525 for the limit/FriCAS > failure. Can you check without too much work which release or even > commit caused the failure? Nope : I had a hunch about possible interference of installed packages, bit the bullet and make distclean && make. So far, the resulting Sage, without any complementary package, passes all tests that failed with the previous versions. Next tests : run ptestlong on this “naked” sage reinstall the optional packages re-run ptestlong. But this will have to wait a bit… HTH, [ Snip… ] >>> >>> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-release" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/ab0a00af-7d37-4c1a-957f-afa09bd8a76cn%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq2FQ4-Fm2J2Gu7JXVSdseOr-ScD2%2BALsMNUtnuXieSTwg%40mail.gmail.com.
[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta1 released
So far : - 9.5.beta1 “naked” passes ptestlong without any failure ; - 9.5.beta1 +Fricas fails the single fricas limit doctest ; - reinstalling the other optional packages entails the same failures as reported above. The problem is that I do not know *which* optional package is responsible for *which* failure. The problem us compunded by the absence of a (documented) way to uninstall a given package. Suggestions ? Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 19:50:00 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > One more data point : ptestlong running on the “naked” 9.1.beta1 + Fricas > gives the single limit failure. > > Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 16:22:26 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > >> Data point : reinstalling Fricas gets me the `plusInfinity()/+Infinity` >> failure in `src/sage/calculus/calculus.py` >> >> HTH, >> >> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 16:15:30 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a >> écrit : >> >>> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 15:11:33 UTC+2, axio…@yahoo.de a écrit : >>> >>> I opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32525 for the limit/FriCAS failure. Can you check without too much work which release or even commit caused the failure? >>> Nope : I had a hunch about possible interference of installed packages, >>> bit the bullet and make distclean && make. So far, the resulting Sage, >>> *without >>> any complementary package*, passes *all* tests that failed with the >>> previous versions. Next tests : >>> >>>- run ptestlong on this “naked” sage >>>- reinstall the optional packages >>>- re-run ptestlong. >>> >>> But this will have to wait a bit… >>> >>> HTH, >>> >>> [ Snip… ] >>> >>> >> >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/ab0a00af-7d37-4c1a-957f-afa09bd8a76cn%40googlegroups.com.
[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta1 released
Yep. *Mea culpa*... Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 21:23:00 UTC+2, axio...@yahoo.de a écrit : > > Is 9.1.beta1 a typo? (Should it be 9.5.beta1?) > emanuel.c...@gmail.com schrieb am Donnerstag, 16. September 2021 um > 19:50:00 UTC+2: > >> One more data point : ptestlong running on the “naked” 9.1.beta1 + >> Fricas gives the single limit failure. >> >> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 16:22:26 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a >> écrit : >> >>> Data point : reinstalling Fricas gets me the `plusInfinity()/+Infinity` >>> failure in `src/sage/calculus/calculus.py` >>> >>> HTH, >>> >>> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 16:15:30 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a >>> écrit : >>> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 15:11:33 UTC+2, axio…@yahoo.de a écrit : I opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32525 for the limit/FriCAS > failure. Can you check without too much work which release or even > commit > caused the failure? > Nope : I had a hunch about possible interference of installed packages, bit the bullet and make distclean && make. So far, the resulting Sage, *without any complementary package*, passes *all* tests that failed with the previous versions. Next tests : - run ptestlong on this “naked” sage - reinstall the optional packages - re-run ptestlong. But this will have to wait a bit… HTH, [ Snip… ] >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/98da36ad-bc92-4c66-b384-616588ca39ban%40googlegroups.com.
[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta1 released
Is 9.1.beta1 a typo? (Should it be 9.5.beta1?) emanuel.c...@gmail.com schrieb am Donnerstag, 16. September 2021 um 19:50:00 UTC+2: > One more data point : ptestlong running on the “naked” 9.1.beta1 + Fricas > gives the single limit failure. > > Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 16:22:26 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > >> Data point : reinstalling Fricas gets me the `plusInfinity()/+Infinity` >> failure in `src/sage/calculus/calculus.py` >> >> HTH, >> >> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 16:15:30 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a >> écrit : >> >>> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 15:11:33 UTC+2, axio…@yahoo.de a écrit : >>> >>> I opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32525 for the limit/FriCAS failure. Can you check without too much work which release or even commit caused the failure? >>> Nope : I had a hunch about possible interference of installed packages, >>> bit the bullet and make distclean && make. So far, the resulting Sage, >>> *without >>> any complementary package*, passes *all* tests that failed with the >>> previous versions. Next tests : >>> >>>- run ptestlong on this “naked” sage >>>- reinstall the optional packages >>>- re-run ptestlong. >>> >>> But this will have to wait a bit… >>> >>> HTH, >>> >>> [ Snip… ] >>> >>> >> >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/fe9c70fc-7083-4d35-9eaf-6017a7325dfen%40googlegroups.com.
[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta1 released
One more data point : ptestlong running on the “naked” 9.1.beta1 + Fricas gives the single limit failure. Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 16:22:26 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > Data point : reinstalling Fricas gets me the `plusInfinity()/+Infinity` > failure in `src/sage/calculus/calculus.py` > > HTH, > > Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 16:15:30 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > >> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 15:11:33 UTC+2, axio…@yahoo.de a écrit : >> >> I opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32525 for the limit/FriCAS >>> failure. Can you check without too much work which release or even commit >>> caused the failure? >>> >> Nope : I had a hunch about possible interference of installed packages, >> bit the bullet and make distclean && make. So far, the resulting Sage, >> *without >> any complementary package*, passes *all* tests that failed with the >> previous versions. Next tests : >> >>- run ptestlong on this “naked” sage >>- reinstall the optional packages >>- re-run ptestlong. >> >> But this will have to wait a bit… >> >> HTH, >> >> [ Snip… ] >> >> > >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/c8dfe743-9c77-4e99-abc1-a2a1d3a787f0n%40googlegroups.com.
[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta1 released
possibly https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31849 is the culprit for the limit/FriCAS failure axio...@yahoo.de schrieb am Donnerstag, 16. September 2021 um 17:19:29 UTC+2: > Do you have easy access to previous sage releases? I don't see a reason > why this test would have passed... > > Martin > > emanuel.c...@gmail.com schrieb am Donnerstag, 16. September 2021 um > 16:22:26 UTC+2: > >> Data point : reinstalling Fricas gets me the `plusInfinity()/+Infinity` >> failure in `src/sage/calculus/calculus.py` >> >> HTH, >> >> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 16:15:30 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a >> écrit : >> >>> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 15:11:33 UTC+2, axio…@yahoo.de a écrit : >>> >>> I opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32525 for the limit/FriCAS failure. Can you check without too much work which release or even commit caused the failure? >>> Nope : I had a hunch about possible interference of installed packages, >>> bit the bullet and make distclean && make. So far, the resulting Sage, >>> *without >>> any complementary package*, passes *all* tests that failed with the >>> previous versions. Next tests : >>> >>>- run ptestlong on this “naked” sage >>>- reinstall the optional packages >>>- re-run ptestlong. >>> >>> But this will have to wait a bit… >>> >>> HTH, >>> >>> [ Snip… ] >>> >>> >> >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/c2c063d4-b2b7-4d7f-a08f-10d8b60d66aen%40googlegroups.com.
[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta1 released
Do you have easy access to previous sage releases? I don't see a reason why this test would have passed... Martin emanuel.c...@gmail.com schrieb am Donnerstag, 16. September 2021 um 16:22:26 UTC+2: > Data point : reinstalling Fricas gets me the `plusInfinity()/+Infinity` > failure in `src/sage/calculus/calculus.py` > > HTH, > > Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 16:15:30 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > >> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 15:11:33 UTC+2, axio…@yahoo.de a écrit : >> >> I opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32525 for the limit/FriCAS >>> failure. Can you check without too much work which release or even commit >>> caused the failure? >>> >> Nope : I had a hunch about possible interference of installed packages, >> bit the bullet and make distclean && make. So far, the resulting Sage, >> *without >> any complementary package*, passes *all* tests that failed with the >> previous versions. Next tests : >> >>- run ptestlong on this “naked” sage >>- reinstall the optional packages >>- re-run ptestlong. >> >> But this will have to wait a bit… >> >> HTH, >> >> [ Snip… ] >> >> > >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/87eb4a16-3430-4a8d-b2bf-4d1e3345c763n%40googlegroups.com.
[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta1 released
Data point : reinstalling Fricas gets me the `plusInfinity()/+Infinity` failure in `src/sage/calculus/calculus.py` HTH, Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 16:15:30 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 15:11:33 UTC+2, axio…@yahoo.de a écrit : > > I opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32525 for the limit/FriCAS >> failure. Can you check without too much work which release or even commit >> caused the failure? >> > Nope : I had a hunch about possible interference of installed packages, > bit the bullet and make distclean && make. So far, the resulting Sage, > *without > any complementary package*, passes *all* tests that failed with the > previous versions. Next tests : > >- run ptestlong on this “naked” sage >- reinstall the optional packages >- re-run ptestlong. > > But this will have to wait a bit… > > HTH, > > [ Snip… ] > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/d26da0f6-20f0-4622-81f6-e0f95505744bn%40googlegroups.com.
[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta1 released
Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 15:11:33 UTC+2, axio…@yahoo.de a écrit : I opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32525 for the limit/FriCAS > failure. Can you check without too much work which release or even commit > caused the failure? > Nope : I had a hunch about possible interference of installed packages, bit the bullet and make distclean && make. So far, the resulting Sage, *without any complementary package*, passes *all* tests that failed with the previous versions. Next tests : - run ptestlong on this “naked” sage - reinstall the optional packages - re-run ptestlong. But this will have to wait a bit… HTH, [ Snip… ] >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/7f4ad220-b6f1-47cc-a576-5b00c158916fn%40googlegroups.com.
[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta1 released
On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build from 9.5.beta0, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/3614c18e-d731-4b35-85f2-fefff7203452n%40googlegroups.com.
