RE: your mail
Simon Cooke wrote: > To be honest... I couldn't find it either... I followed your > directions, and couldn't understand anything that was there (it was > all in Russian). I nosied around, couldn't find anything in English, Clicking on the British flag seems to make it worse! If you click straight on the Sprinter button on the left it seems to be ok. Or you can use this URL for the English version: http://virtuals.atlant.ru/peters/e-sprinter.htm Si (btw, Happy New Year/Millennium peeps!)
Re: your mail
To be honest... I couldn't find it either... I followed your directions, and couldn't understand anything that was there (it was all in Russian). I nosied around, couldn't find anything in English, looked at the pretty picture, and moved on. > Remind me to copy a roadmap next time ;) > > Anyone with any curiosity would have - i'd imagine - at least have a > nosey I did. I couldn't find anything until Ian pointed out what I was supposed to be looking at... Si
Re: your mail
- Original Message - From: Ian Collier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 11:02 PM Subject: Re: your mail > On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 07:33:14PM -, David L wrote: > > A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to > > some people on the list. > > Quite possibly. However, you neglected to mention that this was what > your post was about, and didn't give proper directions to it. Remind me to copy a roadmap next time ;) Anyone with any curiosity would have - i'd imagine - at least have a nosey
Re: your mail
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 07:33:14PM -, David L wrote: > A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to > some people on the list. Quite possibly. However, you neglected to mention that this was what your post was about, and didn't give proper directions to it. imc
Re: your mail
Gordon Wallis wrote: > > Martin Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > > David L wrote: > > > > > > Dont be pedantic > > > > > > A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to > > > some people on the list. > > > [snip] > > > > well, it interested me... perhaps people here should eat more winegums? > > ;) > > > Well, I second _that_! ditto ;) [oh no.. here we go again :)] Fitz -- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ#: 11077801 AOL/CServeIM: Flupert
Re: your mail
Martin Fitzpatrick wrote: > > David L wrote: > > > > Dont be pedantic > > > > A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to > > some people on the list. > [snip] > > well, it interested me... perhaps people here should eat more winegums? > ;) > Well, I second _that_! -- < The HEXdidn't... Homepage: < -- Featuring The U.K. Policenauts Homepage -- > < http://www.hexdidnt.clara.net > \-- AOL Instant Messenger: 'hexdidnt' --/
Re: your mail
David L wrote: > > Dont be pedantic > > A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to > some people on the list. I thought the point you were making was about its method of emulating a speccy right?.. About having a card in the pc's isa?.. If thats not what it said, I've obviously been eating too many winegums. I think I got that from the "ISA" thing on the schematic... so its probably a bit of a big leap thing... but I remember some mention of plug-into-pc sams some while ago.. well, it interested me... perhaps people here should eat more winegums? ;) Fitz -- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ#: 11077801 AOL/CServeIM: Flupert
Re: your mail
David L wrote: > > Dont be pedantic > > A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to > some people on the list. > > Obviously not. > > Oh well. Don't worry David, it was interesting, thank you for pointing the URL out to us. Some people just like to complain about things :) Gavin
Re: your mail
Dont be pedantic A Z380 or Z280 machine would, I would imagine, be remotely of interest to some people on the list. Obviously not. Oh well. - Original Message - From: Ian Collier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 4:11 PM Subject: Re: your mail On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 09:05:09PM -, David L wrote: > Anyone still actually interested in their Sam - try this site... click on > the Union Flag tho ;) > http://virtuals.atlant.ru/peters/e-index.htm Normally I ignore people who just post URLs without saying why I should go to them. You could have put a bit of info there, in particular mentioning what I have to click on to get the info.
Re: your mail
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 09:05:09PM -, David L wrote: > Anyone still actually interested in their Sam - try this site... click on > the Union Flag tho ;) > http://virtuals.atlant.ru/peters/e-index.htm Normally I ignore people who just post URLs without saying why I should go to them. You could have put a bit of info there, in particular mentioning what I have to click on to get the info. The URL above just says "under construction", and news says "No news today". Most of the other buttons are in Russian, including the page I get when I click on the Union Flag. (Well, not quite Russian - the images are in Russian but the text claims to be in the charset 'windows-1251' which doesn't contain Cyrillic characters so it looks like this: "ÁßàØÝà - ÕÞ ÔÞÜÐèÝØÙ ÚÞÜßîÕà"). I was about to give up when I happened to click on "Sprinter" and found the thing you were presumably trying to direct us to. Bit difficult to read but it appears to be a Z84C15-(what?)-based computer with 4096K RAM, 128K ROM, a hard disk and so on, which is Speccy-compatible. imc
Re: your mail
On Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 09:02:58AM +0100, Me wrote: > test Er, yes. Thank you for that fascinating insight... imc
Re: your mail
Jonathan Bristow wrote: >hmmm >I also heard that some scientists have managed to teleport a single Atom. How far? And how many floppies have the teleported? -- Stuart Brady
Re: your mail
hmmm I also heard that some scientists have managed to teleport a single Atom. Respect Another Stranger -Original Message- From: Diggory Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Date: 10 July 1999 01:32 Subject: Re: your mail >Hi di ho > >Andrew Gale wrote: >> >> > internet, but teleporting is still not possible (and will NOT, never ever). >> > >> >> Are you sure about that? > >Thought I heard some stuff recently about quantum entangled teleportation using photons... >Straying off the subject? > :-) > >Diggory >
Re: your mail
Hi di ho Andrew Gale wrote: > > > internet, but teleporting is still not possible (and will NOT, never ever). > > > > Are you sure about that? Thought I heard some stuff recently about quantum entangled teleportation using photons... Straying off the subject? :-) Diggory
Re: your mail
> internet, but teleporting is still not possible (and will NOT, never ever). > Are you sure about that?
Re: your mail
> Van: Aley Keprt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Aan: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no > Onderwerp: Re: your mail > Datum: donderdag, juli 08, 1999 2:00 > > 2, Does anyone want any Spectrum games? (there are about one > > hundred)Although I can't afford to post the games so they would have to be > > collected. > > ftp.nvg contains thousands of ZXS games (possibly...), so there is no need > for your ones, especially when they are "Sam-only". Read carefully "Although I can't afford to post the games so they would have to be collected." So i guess that these are tapes, boxes ect. You can do a lot on the internet, but teleporting is still not possible (and will NOT, never ever). -- Robert van der Veeke, aka RJV Graphics [EMAIL PROTECTED] Currently listening to : Rurouni Kenshin - Brilliant collection - Char's Gelgoog was using a double-bladed beam saber nearly 20 years before Darth Maul came down the pike!
Re: your mail
On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Rob Smith wrote: > Hello Sam Users, > > I recently rediscovered my Spectrum and Sam and have since been transferring > Specy games to Sam disc via a Messenger. I have to get rid of quite a few > specy game as I have little space to keep them all (although I am keeping a > select few). Anyway this brings me to two questions... > > 1, Is there any software that will allow me to compress the messenger files > on my Sam disc as I can only get 11 games on 1 disc? > > 2, Does anyone want any Spectrum games? (there are about one > hundred)Although I can't afford to post the games so they would have to be > collected. ftp.nvg contains thousands of ZXS games (possibly...), so there is no need for your ones, especially when they are "Sam-only". Aley [eili] Keprt - student, programmer (multimedia soft. etc.) phone: +420-68-538 70 35 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** http://get.to/aley
Re: your mail
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Si Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >Graham Goring wrote: >> Ugh! N! I think quotes should always follow the part of the message >> that they are replying too. Makes more sense, especially when replying >> to several different sections in a message, like: > >Are we saying the same thing? I prefer the text for the reply to be below >what you're replying to... > > >> >I like cheese. >> >> As do I. >> >> >I like sock. >> >> But there I must differ. > >... like that! :-) Oh yeah. D'oh. :) My reading skills aren't what they were... Graham Goring -- /\ | Ber-Limey! There's not even enough | |room to swing a cat in this sodding-| \=== ICQ: 5333545 ===/
RE: your mail
Graham Goring wrote: > Ugh! N! I think quotes should always follow the part of the message > that they are replying too. Makes more sense, especially when replying > to several different sections in a message, like: Are we saying the same thing? I prefer the text for the reply to be below what you're replying to... > >I like cheese. > > As do I. > > >I like sock. > > But there I must differ. ... like that! :-) Si
Re: your mail
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Si Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >Lee Willis wrote: >> And if it is necessary the quote should be at the top. > >I think most people prefer it that way, it's more intuitive as you have a >context to read the reply in! Ugh! N! I think quotes should always follow the part of the message that they are replying too. Makes more sense, especially when replying to several different sections in a message, like: >I like cheese. As do I. >I like sock. But there I must differ. Graham Goring -- /\ | Ber-Limey! There's not even enough | |room to swing a cat in this sodding-| \=== ICQ: 5333545 ===/
RE: your mail
Lee Willis wrote: > And if it is necessary the quote should be at the top. I think most people prefer it that way, it's more intuitive as you have a context to read the reply in! There's one guy at our company that still puts his comments BELOW blocks of code, which is most irritating to read!! Si
Re: your mail
Dave Hooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > is it more preferable to have the additions below the quote? i only ever > do that when it's necessary to follow the sense of the thread. i often > just type above the quote because i think it's better (and sometimes it > isn't - like now) If it's not necessary to follow the sense of the thread then IMHO you shouldn't have the quote there anyways ... And if it is necessary the quote should be at the top. HAND Lee. -- I was doing object-oriented assembly at 1 year old ... For some reason my mom insists on calling it "Playing with blocks"
Re: your mail
On Fri, Feb 26, 1999 at 02:40:52PM +, Dave Hooper wrote: > Fair enough > > On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Ian Collier wrote: > > > Yes. HTH. imc Pred. imc
Re: your mail
Fair enough On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Ian Collier wrote: > Yes. HTH. imc
Re: your mail
On Fri, Feb 26, 1999 at 02:20:19PM +, Dave Hooper wrote: > is it more preferable to have the additions below the quote? Yes. HTH. imc
Re: your mail
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Ian Collier wrote: > (Why is your quoting upside down?) quoting? upside down? how'd'you mean, guv? i'm using pine, it's not clever, i just reply to the message and put my own additions absolutely wherever i like. is it more preferable to have the additions below the quote? i only ever do that when it's necessary to follow the sense of the thread. i often just type above the quote because i think it's better (and sometimes it isn't - like now) dave
Re: your mail
On Fri, Feb 26, 1999 at 01:49:26PM +, Dave Hooper wrote: > ... i must've missed something ... in-joke, right? > > On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Martin Krammer wrote: > > help No, it just means Frode hasn't got "administrivia" turned on in the list config. :-) (Why is your quoting upside down?) imc
Re: your mail
... i must've missed something ... in-joke, right? dave On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Martin Krammer wrote: > help >
Re: your mail
On Thu, Feb 18, 1999 at 12:01:24PM -, Chris White wrote: > unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] No. You can't. We refuse to let you go. imc