Re: [Samba] cannot write to my shares - SOLVED
Hi! At 21:29 05.08.2003 +0200, you wrote: At 21:05 05.08.2003 +0200, you wrote: Make sure you have writable = yes for each of your shares, My config file included read only = no, isn't that the same? OK, I found it. I have to mount the Partition with umask=, then it's possible for every user (including the guest account) to write to it, too. But is there a possibility that I give write access to someone who connects as a guest but deny writing access to the users on the local machine? (That would make sense for e.g. a webserver that has several user accounts but also provides file sharing for the local network it is connected to.) Bye Tobias __ mp3's prime time is over... use open source, patent-free ogg-vorbis for audio compression -- www.vorbis.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Winbind fails w/ 3beta3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Lahners, Jeremy wrote: I'm having an unusual problem with my new samba servers. Notice, servers is plural, meaning all of my new servers are experiencing exactly the same problem at different times throughout the day, which leads me to believe that the problem is not with samba but with my Win2k server. However, I still need help in determining what is causing the problem... At various times during the day, winbind stops responding to requests to authenticate. ANY attempts to map to the drive fail. However, any existing connections to services continue to work just fine. A restart of winbind fixes the problem immediately. A quick scan of the client log file shows... [2003/08/06 07:49:13, 0] auth/auth_util.c:make_server_info_info3(994) make_server_info_info3: pdb_init_sam failed! Can you give me some more information about your domain infrastructure? Maybe a level 10 debug log? cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there. --John Cusack - Grosse Point Blank (1997) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE/Mz6rIR7qMdg1EfYRAhj1AJ91jQ7geRku/58OaagPcI1dX8vYVgCdFlkX rY9zBvh4fQvyMHVjIAzYgEM= =e/g4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Finally winbind on RH9 working, but why ?
I had similar problems with getent on one of my servers. After some investigation, I had forgotten to edit /etc/nsswitch.conf to add winbind to the users and groups there. Wbinfo worked great, nothing from getent. After the change, and a restart of winbind (don't know if that was necessary or not) all was well. Jeremy Lahners [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Schemmer Associates Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Maybe I'll rephrase it shorter : 1) eventhough 'wbinfo -g' gives me the correct groups, they do not show up when I go 'getent group'. Can it be the spaces in the Samba groups 'Domain Admins' and 'Domain Users'? Where is the information about these groups stored on the Samba pdc? 2) I only get winbind to do it's job (which is connecting to a local share on the domain member with a winbind user) when I a) set the parameter 'winbind cache timeout = 0' OR b) create the user locally on the domain member, which is of course what we try to avoid by using winbind... any idea's why playing with the cache timeout causes a difference? Thanks in advance... the full story is below but I guess it's to long for anyone to read *grin* Jo De Baer -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Need help on default-ACLs and create mask
Dear Readers: I'm using Samba 2.2.8a on a Solaris 9 machine. Samba has been compiled with ACL-Support and everything works fine, but there is one feature that I dont understand. A file that is created in a directory with default ACLs for the owner, group and others-permissions will inherit these permissions and the umask will be ignored. Example: cd /var/tmp mkdir dir setfacl -s u::rwx,g::rwx,o:---,d:u::rwx,d:g::rwx,d:o:rwx dir umask 022 touch dir/testfile ls -l dir/testfile Result: -rw-rw-rw- 1 root other 0 Aug 6 16:59 dir/testfile Samba will NOT ignore the create mask parameter in this situation. Is this a bug or a feature? Any suggestions on how to configure samba, so that files in some directories of a share will get 666-rights while others (in the same share ) will get 664? Thanks Peter -- Peter Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Small problem - Samba-2.2.7a-7.9.0
Hi I have sall problem - samba-2.2.7a-7.9.0 for Red Hat 9... When I copy more files or large file with Server Samba to Windows 98, all computer (server samba) restart... so Mariusz Rosinski PS Sorry, my English is not very well - but :)) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 2.2.8a file permissions not working
The ACL is not the issue here, but being able to change the basic user,group.other permissions on files/folders. Right now 2.2.8a seems to ignore any permission changes you make from W2K. In playing around some more I find that it will remove permissions, but you cannot add permissions. On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 02:46 PM, Errol Neal wrote: Or our two UNIX file servers, one is Solaris 8 and the other RedHat Linux 7.3. Samba was compiled as follows: configure --prefix=/opt/samba --with-acl-support --with-quotas Right now it doesn't looks like changing file/folder permissions are working from W2K. When we right click on a file/folder and go to the security tab it show the current file permissions fine. But when you try to change them it is being ignored. No error messages are being shown. No matter what we do no changes are happening on the UNIX side. This occurs on the Linux file server too. This did work in 2.2.7a and compiled the same way as above. Is there something different in 2.2.8a, or is this a bug In order to use '--with-acl-support', your kernel needs to have acl-support, and that is dependant upon the file system you are running. Red Hat 9 does not have ACL support in the default kerner NOR do Red Hat's modified kernels up to 2.4.21, so my guess is your RH 7.3 does not have ACL support either. Errol Errol Neal, Systems/Network Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Enhanced Technologies Inc. http://www.enhtech.com 703-924-0301 or 800-368-3249 703-924-0302 Fax --- C. J. Keist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UNIX/Network ManagerPhone: 970-491-0630 Engineering Network ServicesFax: 970-491-5569 College of Engineering, CSU Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301 All I want is a chance to prove 'Money can't buy happiness' -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] samba-3.0.0 Beta3 LDAP error
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 02:46, Matt Bednarik wrote:
I installed samba 3.0.0 beta3 on FreeBSD 5.0 alpha RELEASE, with
./configure --with-ldapsam --with-quotas --prefix=/usr/local/ldapsamba,
the smbd log told me this:
2003/08/07 07:37:29, 0] lib/module.c:smb_load_module(40)
Error loading module '/usr/local/ldapsamba/lib/pdb/ldapsam.so': Cannot
open /usr/local/ldapsamba/lib/pdb/ldapsam.so
[2003/08/07 07:37:29, 0] passdb/pdb_interface.c:make_pdb_methods_name(447)
No builtin nor plugin backend for ldapsam found
[2003/08/07 07:37:29, 1] passdb/pdb_interface.c:make_pdb_context_list(537)
Loading ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1 failed!
I did a updatedb and then did a locate ldapsam.so and it found nothing.
That file does not exist in that directory either.
I was having problem with this also but I found a work-around, the
problem is when you run the configure script it tests to see if it can
compile a test program against the LDAP libraries but if it can't, it
won't tell you. When you run configure check for a place where it says
it's testing for LDAP support and check the few lines after it, chances
are it'll say it can't find ldap or something like that.
If you want to test your LDAP libraries yourself make a small c file
like this (I'm not a programmer at all so I'm not even sure if I'm using
the function correctly or if there's mistake in the program but it
compiled on my computer, that's the important part, I'm sure a
programmer would find mistakes in this 10 lines of code):
---
#include stdio.h
#include ldap.h
int main()
{
ldap_init(127.0.0.1 389);
return 0;
}
---
Compile it using gcc -lldap -o file file.c If you can't compile it
then Samba won't be able to compile itself with LDAP support.
So now you have two options, modify the Samba compile scripts or the
OpenLDAP compile scripts. I choose the later since it'll solve problems
when linking other programs against the OpenLDAP library (and I tried to
modify the Samba compile scripts but had no luck with that).
I've attached the patch I used to compile OpenLDAP so it would link
against the other libraries it needs so you can compile the test program
(and Samba) against the LDAP libraries. It's based on a Redhat patch
since when I tried to compiled Samba on Redhat it worked but the Redhat
patch didn't work out of the box when I tried to use it to compile
OpenLDAP on Slackware. Also I'm not sure that's the right way to do it
but it works for me!
Let me know if it works.
Jean-Rene Cormier
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Unix UID from LDAP
On 7 Aug 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 17:10, Raul Umyarov wrote: Hello How can I create single samba users database in OpenLDAP without creating local user account? I am successful create SambaSamAccount with Samba 3.0beta3. But following Samba HOWTO Collection (from 3.0beta3), ldapsam is just password backend and not provided replacement of /etc/passwd. There is sambaIdmapEntry in ldap schemas in samba 3.0beta3, but samba don`t use it. May be it is for winbind only? Correct - much to my disappointment, this code was removed during the Samba 3.0 beta process. It is now only used by winbind. However, you have always needed to have the users in nsswitch, the usual solution being to use nss_ldap. (Which will give you a similar result, in the end). Just to clarify things, the code was removed because there were various problems and inconsistencies in the idmap layer. It was not pulled out willy nilly. Andrew knows this but just failed to mention it. cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there. --John Cusack - Grosse Point Blank (1997) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] pdbedit handles samba domain name incorrectly
Am Freitag, 8. August 2003 13:25 schrieben Sie: So, you have configured a 'strange' setup, specifically overriding how the Samba team constructs and tests the system, then wonder why it breaks? ;) I tried to follow the KISS (keep it small and simple) principle to reduce side-effects of configuration changes. One tool one job. Tools like smbclient need to know if Samba is acting as a PDC - because the name of the 'sam' is only the workgroup name for the PDC, otherwise, it's the name of the machine. (individual machines may each have accounts in LDAP servers, for their own 'local' accounts, should you wish to configure it this way.) Most probably my understanding of 'SAM' is a bit lacking. I always thought of domains as databases containing machine and user accounts. So for single machines this concept is extended to local user accounts being members of a local domain? Is this right? Shouldn't we then somehow distinguish between workgroup names (for browsing services) and domain names (for accounts, authentication etc)? New smb.conf option...? Marcus -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba + Cups: don't succeed to print from Windows 2000station
Hello, I have configured cups (1.1.18) on a Suse 8.2 Pro Linux server. I have also configured samba (2.2.7a), and joined a domain. I have created printers with cups and declared them to samba with cupsaddsmb command. All seems to be ok. I can print from my Linux server. But, when I want to print from ny windows2000 station: - I can find my linux server - I can find and connect printers which are declared - I do not succeed to print (the test page or another document). The system says it is not able to print. I do not see the job on the cups web interface. May someone help me ? Is there a problem rather with cups or with samba configuration ? What is the point of locking ? I executed cupstestppd on cups-samba printers ppd files. All values are 'pass'. I looked at log files, but didnt see anything that helped me. So if someone has some idea to help me, the idea would be welcome. Regards, Nadine -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba 3 beta 3 helpers and squid?
ntlm_auth basic works, but ntlm doesn't appear to. Any chance of implementing -l like in the man page? The messages below are from squid's cache log. [2003/08/08 11:00:19, 10] utils/ntlm_auth.c:manage_squid_request(374) Got 'YR' from squid (length: 2). [2003/08/08 11:00:19, 10] utils/ntlm_auth.c:manage_squid_ntlmssp_request(296) got NTLMSSP packet: [2003/08/08 11:00:19, 10] utils/ntlm_auth.c:manage_squid_ntlmssp_request(306) NTLMSSP challenge [2003/08/08 11:00:19, 10] utils/ntlm_auth.c:manage_squid_request(374) Got 'KK TlRMTVNTUAADGAAYAFsYABgAcwwADABABwAHAEwIAAgAUwAA AACLBgIAIFRDU19NQUlOX0RPTUpBUkJPRURCQzAwNjc4NNn7Yl6XTBHkXHQAwwOrD5hN 2tl9N3RVsZo2QnBIoeLXMFPKDfb5lzrR+rE/oeQRaA==' from squid (length: 191). [2003/08/08 11:00:19, 10] utils/ntlm_auth.c:manage_squid_ntlmssp_request(296) got NTLMSSP packet: (Then there's a 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1887), 140 bytes, would that be useful?) [2003/08/08 11:00:19, 3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:ntlmssp_server_auth(283) Got user=[JARBOED] domain=[TCS_MAIN_DOM] workstation=[BC006784] len1=24 len2=24 [2003/08/08 11:00:19, 10] utils/ntlm_auth.c:manage_squid_ntlmssp_request(309) NTLMSSP NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED When I browser uses a different proxy (samba 2.2.8a and wb_ntlmauth), NTLM works. Do you see anything suspicious? ~ Daniel --- This message is the property of Time Inc. or its affiliates. It may be legally privileged and/or confidential and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s). No addressee should forward, print, copy, or otherwise reproduce this message in any manner that would allow it to be viewed by any individual not originally listed as a recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this message. Thank you. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Too many open files error
We have a Sun E450 running Solaris 8 and Samba 2.2.8a as our domain controller. We have had no problems with Samba until earlier this week when we have started to get lots of these errors in log.smbd: [2003/08/08 16:29:14, 0] lib/debug.c:(348) Unable to open new log file /home/samba_pearl/var/log.smbd: Too many open file s This has been happening once a day, at the same time some users are not able to print from their PCs (the machine also controls printing via Samba and Cups). Any idea what could be going wrong? Michael -- Michael Keightley [EMAIL PROTECTED]Tel: +44 131 240 3137 Systems Manager, Quadstone Limited,Fax: +44 131 220 4492 16 Chester Street, Edinburgh EH3 7RA, Scotland http://www.quadstone.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] (no subject)
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba's Performance and reliability question
Hello everyone. I am about to rollout a samba PDC running 2.2.8a with LDAP on the backend to hold user accounts and passwords. I just wanted to ask a few questions about performance and stability. My network is around 40 users at this time, and will most likely jump to about 80 by the end of the year. The server I set the PDC on is a Xeon 2.8ghz with 2gigs RAM and 3 hot-swapable SCSI 320 drives configured in a RAID 5 array. I have about 70 gigs of space to work with. Besides doing authentication for my users, the PDC will also host a directory that users will access on a daily basis. With that in mind, I wanted to get some feedback about the expectations I may expect as well as any potential dowfalls. Also, what else can I do to increae performance, stability and security? I appreciate everyones input and help. Cheers, Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Group mapping... static ???
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote: Hi all, I'm testing group mapping, wondering how It works exactly... I thought Samba was storing a mapping table allowing to retreive infos on Unix/Windows groups in a DYNAMIC way. Unfortunately, group mapping seems to be static, here is what I did : net groupmap sets up static mappings. winbindd can assign mappings between group SIDs and gids dynamtically. Here is what I don't understand : If I delete the groupmapping or modify it, the SambaPrimaryGroupSid of foo isn't modified ! Foo remains a Domain User... Another example : if I create first the user, then the mapping : the user doens't get the new SambaPrimaryGroupSid and doesn't become a Domain User... Am I missing something ? Is the mapping only used while creating users ? I thought the table was used in a more dynamic way... Is there a technical limit in implementing this function this way ? Please help me... For now you just have to make sure to clean up both entries. Sorry. It's on the todo list somewhere to fix. cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there. --John Cusack - Grosse Point Blank (1997) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE/Mz8JIR7qMdg1EfYRAmVJAJ0S/oLuzHfpOQ8RIjjbNMdJ8obrmACgsVY/ Us2N3IlcT/Y1RcGMb33ev9c= =vwft -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 2.2.8a file permissions not working
We have upgraded from Samba 2.2.7a to 2.2.8a. We have samba running our our two UNIX file servers, one is Solaris 8 and the other RedHat Linux 7.3. Samba was compiled as follows: configure --prefix=/opt/samba --with-acl-support --with-quotas Right now it doesn't looks like changing file/folder permissions are working from W2K. When we right click on a file/folder and go to the security tab it show the current file permissions fine. But when you try to change them it is being ignored. No error messages are being shown. No matter what we do no changes are happening on the UNIX side. This occurs on the Linux file server too. This did work in 2.2.7a and compiled the same way as above. Is there something different in 2.2.8a, or is this a bug Thanks... --- C. J. Keist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UNIX/Network ManagerPhone: 970-491-0630 Engineering Network ServicesFax: 970-491-5569 College of Engineering, CSU Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301 All I want is a chance to prove 'Money can't buy happiness' -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba Team Debian repository
After users request I've just added the Release file to our Debian packages rep on samba.org mirrors. Hope this helps. Simo. -- Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano mobile: +39 329 328 7702 tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] DID IT! - Samba 2.2.8a+LDAP+PDC
I am so stoked I just had to share this with y'all. I just SEAMLESSLY migrated all of my machines and users over to my new Gentoo Linux Server. I even kept the same: domain name and old PDC NetBios name. The trickiest part was getting all of the users to keep their same profile, but I managed that by cloning the RID and Lanman/NT hashes for the user accounts. Free at last! # include much_backpatting.h -- Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] device sequence
How can I change the device startup sequence ? I´d like to start pcmcia device before the network card start. Thanks Djoni -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] It turns out this all happened because of a brand newnetwork switch. We put
the old one back in out of desperation and, BAM, all the problems went away. There were no other symtoms that pointed at that switch so we didn't suspect it all. Re: [Samba] Win98 troubles - Resolved Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:59:21 + Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailer: AngleMail for phpGroupWare (http://www.phpgroupware.org) v 0.9.14.006 It turns out this all happened because of a brand new network switch. We put the old one back in out of desperation and, BAM, all the problems went away. There were no other symtoms that pointed at that switch so we didn't suspect it all. The leason here is if it doesn't work inspite of all the correct settings, start replacing hardware. So thanks guys. -- Bob Crandell Assured Computing When you need to be sure. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.assuredcomp.com Voice - 541-689-9159 FAX - 541-463-1627 Eugene, Oregon -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba3+KBC
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Jan Peuker wrote: Hi Jerry, hi List, maybe this is a boring question - but where may I find configure in the CVS? you have to generate it by running ./autogen.sh cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there. --John Cusack - Grosse Point Blank (1997) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
CVS update: samba/source/smbd
Date: Thu Aug 7 05:36:08 2003 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/smbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12997/smbd Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 open.c oplock.c Log Message: An oplock break reply from the client causes the sequence number to be updated by 2 if there is no open reply outstanding, else by one Yes - this makes no sense Jeremy. Revisions: open.c 1.115.2.25 = 1.115.2.26 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/open.c.diff?r1=1.115.2.25r2=1.115.2.26 oplock.c1.64.2.7 = 1.64.2.8 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/oplock.c.diff?r1=1.64.2.7r2=1.64.2.8
CVS update: samba/source/smbd
Date: Thu Aug 7 02:59:52 2003 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/smbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30356/smbd Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 blocking.c notify.c oplock.c process.c Log Message: Turns out I had my packet sequences wrong for oplock break code. I was storing the mid of the oplock break - I should have been storing the mid from the open. There are thus 2 types of deferred packet sequence returns - ones that increment the sequence number (returns from oplock causing opens) and ones that don't (change notify returns etc). Running with signing forced on does lead to some interesting tests :-). Jeremy. Revisions: blocking.c 1.28.2.6 = 1.28.2.7 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/blocking.c.diff?r1=1.28.2.6r2=1.28.2.7 notify.c1.14.2.4 = 1.14.2.5 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/notify.c.diff?r1=1.14.2.4r2=1.14.2.5 oplock.c1.64.2.6 = 1.64.2.7 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/oplock.c.diff?r1=1.64.2.6r2=1.64.2.7 process.c 1.92.2.21 = 1.92.2.22 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/process.c.diff?r1=1.92.2.21r2=1.92.2.22
CVS update: samba/source/auth
Date: Fri Aug 8 05:11:11 2003 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/auth In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv21773/auth Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 auth_util.c Log Message: need to be able to connect to a domain member as a local account; don't always map to the domain name Revisions: auth_util.c 1.39.2.41 = 1.39.2.42 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/auth/auth_util.c.diff?r1=1.39.2.41r2=1.39.2.42
