Re: [Samba] uncovering groupmap problems
Monday, December 22, 2003, 1:14:40 PM, Craig wrote: Did you create 'root' group in ldap? yes - it was listed in first message of this thread. Both records actually. Oh, sorry :-) I don't have samba+ldap running right now so i can't test wether it works or not. i hope this is not a(nother) samba bugs. did you check ldap log? grep MOD ldap.log or just delete and add mapping again --beast -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] cancelling interdomain trusts
Monday, December 22, 2003, 1:40:12 PM, Craig wrote: # smbpasswd -x -i MULLEN Me myself did not 'trust' smbpasswd or pdbedit tools to modify any attributes in ldap, because most account are not samba specific account only. better to write your own script for better control of ldap entry. Learning Samba 3 (so much has changed from 2.2x) simultaneously with LDAP has been a numbing experience. Methinks that there are config stuff for smb3 that aren't in LDAP db - possibly in secrets.tdb - sort of samba's equiv to the Windows registry. Don't mind passwords, but where do they hide the things like group mapping and domain trusts? I probably should have 'nuked' the secrets.tdb but I'm tired, chicken and perhaps someone will shine light in the dark corners. groupmapping is stored in ldap, see sambaGroupMapping objectclass. --beast -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] enabling remote desktop
That is the net result you would have come up with had you followed my suggestion (after a bit of mucking around :). The relevant policy description is in c:\windows\inf\system.adm (on my pc at least) and looks like: POLICY !!TS_DISABLE_CONNECTIONS #if version = 4 SUPPORTED !!TS_SUPPORTED_WindowsXP #endif EXPLAIN !!TS_DISABLE_CONNECTIONS_EXPLAIN ACTIONLISTON VALUENAME fDenyTSConnectionsVALUE NUMERIC 1 END ACTIONLISTON ACTIONLISTOFF VALUENAME fDenyTSConnectionsVALUE NUMERIC 0 END ACTIONLISTOFF END POLICY But I only found it quickly because of the key in your email, google is indeed a wonderful tool. Have a look around in the file though and you'll see some other useful keys you can set. James -Original Message- From: Andrew Gaffney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 22 December 2003 17:00 To: James Harper Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] enabling remote desktop I have found a bit easier way to do this. Create a file called rdesktop.reg (or whatever you feel like calling it): Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Terminal Server] fDenyTSConnections=dword: Then, in your netlogon script, add the line: regedit /s \\where\the\reg\file\is\rdesktop.reg Voila, the next time that a user logs in on that XP workstation, Remote Desktop Sharing will magically be enabled. Behold the power of Google! James Harper wrote: Me too!!! I've never done this before, but this might be worth a try if nothing else works: 1. run gpedit.msc on an xp machine and find the policy you want to enable. 2. search for that policy in the .adm files (c:\windows\inf\*.adm) to find out the registry setting that should be set. They are just text files. 3. get a machine with the policy set how you want it and export that registry entry to a file in your netlogon share 4. in your startup script, import that file into the registry. Not sure how to do that 'silently' but there is probably a way. 5. enjoy There may be a problem with persistence though, something else may override your registry entries. If this is true and you also have to reboot for the registry entries to take effect, then it won't work. If you find a better way then please share it as I'd like a tidy solution too. Hth. James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:samba- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Gaffney Sent: Friday, 19 December 2003 13:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] enabling remote desktop Is there a way to automatically enable Remote Desktop from a NETLOGON script? I want to enable Remote Desktop on *a lot* of machines, but I don't want to do it manually. -- Andrew Gaffney -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- Andrew Gaffney -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] So sweet ...
..::: Max Teens :::... http://210.101.95.254/maxteen/ ^^^^^^ Click here to see more Every day you see a lot you teens on the streets but you never know what do they usually do when alone! You think studying and learning poems? You're wrong then. When young hot girls are alone - they lose their good girls face and show their lascivious nature! Have you ever seen young boy and girls fucking like mad beasts on the floor in the bathroom? Have you ever seen them sucking one another's crotches right on the white leather sofa? Be sure - soon you will get this chance! http://210.101.95.254/maxteen/ ^^^^^^ Click here to see more -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] cancelling interdomain trusts
Hi Craig I'm new to Samba 3, and I still have problems with LDAP ;o) But maybe i can help on this... I think you want to remove a Workstation (the $ told me that) but there're not the W flag in sambaAcctFlags. Sorry if I'm wrong... Seb. Selon Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mother always told me that there'd be days like this. She just didn't tell me that they go on for weeks. OK - John's book suggests that we're not complete in this arena here...Yeah, I bought the Samba 3 How-to-guide - Borders/Phoenix had 3 on the shelf (now 2) - and also an LDAP book for reference. It's been a fun weekend ;-) problemo... # smbpasswd -x -i MULLEN ldapsam_delete_entry: Could not delete attributes for uid=mullen$,ou=People,o=Mullen,c=US, error: Object class violation (object class 'person' requires attribute 'cn') Failed to delete entry for user MULLEN$. Failed to modify password entry for user MULLEN$ [must check - yes, cn=MULLEN$ is there, but the $ is probably kinking the hose...dunno - it found it in simple search further down email] # net rpc trustdom list Password: The username or password was not correct. [2003/12/21 23:08:46, 0] utils/net_rpc.c:rpc_trustdom_list(2028) Couldn't connect to domain controller [too tired to figure this last one out] # ldapsearch -x -h localhost -b 'o=Mullen,c=US' '(uid=MULLEN$)' version: 2 # # filter: (uid=MULLEN$) # requesting: ALL # # mullen$, People, Mullen, US dn: uid=mullen$,ou=People,o=Mullen,c=US uid: mullen$ cn: mullen$ sn: mullen$ mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] objectClass: person objectClass: organizationalPerson objectClass: inetOrgPerson objectClass: posixAccount objectClass: top objectClass: kerberosSecurityObject objectClass: sambaSamAccount krbName: [EMAIL PROTECTED] loginShell: /bin/false uidNumber: 1001 gidNumber: 1001 homeDirectory: /home/mullen sambaSID: S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-3002 sambaPrimaryGroupSID: S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-3003 sambaPwdCanChange: 1072073389 sambaPwdMustChange: 2147483647 sambaLMPassword: the-names-have-been-changed sambaNTPassword: to-protect-the-innocent sambaPwdLastSet: 1072073389 sambaAcctFlags: [I ] yes, there's an entry in /etc/passwd for MULLEN$ (had to hand edit after adding the user mullen) interdomain trust was working earlier today - but I ended up purging the LDAP one last time because I had to get rid of SID's from original domain captured by net rpc vampire and create a new SID for the second domain. wanted to just delete the trust from LINUX-DOMAIN to WINDOWS-DOMAIN to start over. Trust from WINDOWS-DOMAIN to LINUX-DOMAIN seems OK. Learning Samba 3 (so much has changed from 2.2x) simultaneously with LDAP has been a numbing experience. Methinks that there are config stuff for smb3 that aren't in LDAP db - possibly in secrets.tdb - sort of samba's equiv to the Windows registry. Don't mind passwords, but where do they hide the things like group mapping and domain trusts? I probably should have 'nuked' the secrets.tdb but I'm tired, chicken and perhaps someone will shine light in the dark corners. Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbldap Tools problem
Hi all! I want to thanks all people here for their help, good job guys! :o) And nox, it's my question: I'm using smbldap-tools 0.8.2 from samba.idealx.org. In all the docs I read about it, I read that I must put these lines in smb.conf: passwd program = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-passwd.pl -o %u passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *successfully* I look in the code of the Perl script, and I saw 2 things: 1- there's no -o option 2- there no print (like successfully) when the end is OK, just nothing 3- the first new is New, beware of the case, its (very) sensitive And my question is: how is everybody able to use smbldap-tools without any modifications (except for smbldap_conf.pm ofcourse) ??? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Getting Spam from mailing List: [Samba] Notice for you
Hi everyone, since I subscribed to this mailing list (about two days ago) I`m receiving the attached message about 5-10 times a day. Has anybody had the same problem? And how can the problem be solved?? Best regads, Sven P.S.: In case anybody wonders, the email address used to subscribe to the mailing list has never been used before. Begin forwarded message: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: December 21, 2003 4:35:04 AM CET To: undisclosed-recipients: ; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: [Samba] Notice for you ..::: Drunk Young :::... http://210.101.95.254/drunk-young Click here to Join Drunk Young will take you to the new level of excitement. It is a guarantee of Your pleasure, because we choose models very seriously carefully, depending on you offers and suggestions. 'Drunk Young' is regularly updates to bring you more and more sweet nymphets 100% satisfaction guarantee, with unique content of shiny floral girls. That's why we have very high percentage of monthly rebills. Every day we take new pictures and videos at our own studio. At summer we often making photo sessions in country side, villages and also in another countys. Every week we update site content with fresh faces never been seen before. We offer you. 1. Exclusive content, just from our studio, with young pretty (some of them drunk :) girls: at least more than 66 boys and girls models. 2. Thousands of original pictures are the crystal clear quality and hi-resolution 1024 X 768 or more. All videos are in DivX format(DVD quality). 3. We choose models depending on you offers and suggestions. 4. EVERY 3-5 DAYS we add new content with new girls and boys! 5. All video in the members area can be saved directly to your hard-drive. 6. 24*7 responsive support: you can ask questions and express your wishes any time at our forum, we have what to discuss. I control support team everyday. 7. Many thanks for our hoster, you'll have super-fast and reliable connection with our server. and the last, but not the least reason: 8. 100 % confidentiality of your personal data. All transactions are 100% safe secure. http://210.101.95.254/drunk-young Click here to Join zone.hoha.ru/unsubscribe Click here to unsubscribe -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: Getting Spam from mailing List: [Samba] Notice for you
Sven bentlage wrote: Hi everyone, since I subscribed to this mailing list (about two days ago) I`m receiving the attached message about 5-10 times a day. Has anybody had the same problem? And how can the problem be solved?? Best regads, Sven P.S.: In case anybody wonders, the email address used to subscribe to the mailing list has never been used before. I noticed a very large upswing in spam after being subscribed here several days also. In fact it seems that the anti virus servers are sending back message denied signals also, which makes the traffic worse. is there an admin on this list who is concerned with SPAM/Antivirus filtering. If so can they please have a look at this. Of course this being a samba list, there must be more of you using outlook and m$ mail software which would explain it... So please patch patch your clients also -- James McDonald Singleton Australia 61+ (0)2 65712401 61+ 0428 320 219 Never make any mistaeks. (Anonymous, in a mail discussion about to a kernel bug report.) Linux 2.6.0-james7 #1 Thu Dec 18 22:01:50 EST 2003 athlon i386 GNU/Linux 00:00:00 up 4 days, 40 min, 2 users, load average: 1.53, 0.74, 0.34 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Wall Alarm
Wall Server: lfknplnm03 --- Mail-Info From: Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: undisclosed-recipients: ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Rec.: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 12/22/2003 03:22:52 AM Subject:[Samba] So sweet ... --- TXU Communications automatically screens all e-mail for inappropriate subject matter (i.e. material that is offensive, harassing, threatening, discriminatory, sexually explicit, pornographic or obscene). Based on this initial screening, the e-mail, referenced in the above subject, may contain information that is considered inappropriate for the business environment. The information of concern is shown below. If you have any questions, please direct them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your cooperation. _ 'fucking' found in ' Have you ever seen young boy and girls fucking like mad beasts on the floor in the bathroom? ' ! Mail has not been delivered! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Offensive Email - [Samba] So sweet ...
This message has not been delivered to your intended recipient(s) as it is in quarantine at Air New Zealand. Automated Scanning tools have detected content in this message that appears not to conform to the airline's E-mail usage policy. Sometimes these tools detect in error so if this is a valid business email please forward this reject message to your original recipient who can then arrange for the complete message to be delivered to them. Message: B0015f1000.0001.mml From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] So sweet ...-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Notification
* eManager Notification ** Recipient, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** End of message *** Received: from 208.8.92.60 by jupiter.INSIDEAI.COM (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 04:23:17 -0500 Received: from lists.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]) by viruswall.ai-logix.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35) with ESMTP id com for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 04:24:37 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261612C2EB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 09:23:14 + (GMT) X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [172.182.103.41] (ACB66729.ipt.aol.com [172.182.103.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839FB2C015 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 09:22:52 + (GMT) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 09:22:52 + (GMT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: undisclosed-recipients: ; X-Mail-Format-Warning: Bad RFC2822 header formatting in 22 Dec 2003 12:23:08 -0500 From: Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.00.6) Personal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on dp.samba.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-81.3 required=3.5 tests=BAYES_99,CLICK_BELOW_CAPS, FORGED_MUA_THEBAT,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_LINK_CLICK_CAPS, HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE,LIVE_PORN,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DSBL,RCVD_IN_NJABL, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP,RCVD_IN_SORBS,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=spam version=2.60 X-Spam-Level: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.3 Cc: Subject: [Samba] So sweet ... X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3 Precedence: list List-Id: General questions regarding Samba samba.lists.samba.org List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Notification
* eManager Notification ** Recipient, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** End of message *** Received: from 208.8.92.60 by jupiter.INSIDEAI.COM (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 04:23:40 -0500 Received: from lists.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]) by viruswall.ai-logix.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35) with ESMTP id com for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 04:25:00 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D35B2C307 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 09:23:37 + (GMT) X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [172.182.103.41] (ACB66729.ipt.aol.com [172.182.103.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839FB2C015 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 09:22:52 + (GMT) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 09:22:52 + (GMT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: undisclosed-recipients: ; X-Mail-Format-Warning: Bad RFC2822 header formatting in 22 Dec 2003 12:23:08 -0500 From: Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.00.6) Personal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on dp.samba.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-81.3 required=3.5 tests=BAYES_99,CLICK_BELOW_CAPS, FORGED_MUA_THEBAT,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_LINK_CLICK_CAPS, HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE,LIVE_PORN,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DSBL,RCVD_IN_NJABL, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP,RCVD_IN_SORBS,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=spam version=2.60 X-Spam-Level: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.3 Cc: Subject: [Samba] So sweet ... X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3 Precedence: list List-Id: General questions regarding Samba samba.lists.samba.org List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Notification
* eManager Notification ** Recipient, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** End of message *** Received: from 208.8.92.60 by jupiter.INSIDEAI.COM (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 04:24:59 -0500 Received: from lists.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]) by viruswall.ai-logix.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35) with ESMTP id com for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 04:26:19 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CB32C407 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 09:24:56 + (GMT) X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail5.txucom.net (mail5.txucom.net [207.70.175.242]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B02B2C39D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 09:23:21 + (GMT) Received: (qmail 8795 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2003 09:23:21 - Received: from mail.txucom.com (HELO lfknplnm03.txucom.com) ([207.70.128.3]) (envelope-sender [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by mail5.txucom.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 22 Dec 2003 09:23:21 - X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 03:23:18 -0600 From: 'lfknplnm03_Wall_Demon'@txucom.com To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on lfknplnm03/TXUC(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 12/22/2003 03:23:19 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on dp.samba.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=3.5 tests=BAYES_44,NO_REAL_NAME, PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Level: * Cc: Subject: [Samba] Wall Alarm X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3 Precedence: list Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Id: General questions regarding Samba samba.lists.samba.org List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Notification
* eManager Notification ** Recipient, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** End of message *** Received: from 208.8.92.60 by jupiter.INSIDEAI.COM (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 04:25:33 -0500 Received: from lists.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]) by viruswall.ai-logix.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35) with ESMTP id com for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 04:26:54 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5752C30F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 09:25:31 + (GMT) X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail5.txucom.net (mail5.txucom.net [207.70.175.242]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B02B2C39D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 09:23:21 + (GMT) Received: (qmail 8795 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2003 09:23:21 - Received: from mail.txucom.com (HELO lfknplnm03.txucom.com) ([207.70.128.3]) (envelope-sender [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by mail5.txucom.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 22 Dec 2003 09:23:21 - X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 03:23:18 -0600 From: 'lfknplnm03_Wall_Demon'@txucom.com To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on lfknplnm03/TXUC(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 12/22/2003 03:23:19 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on dp.samba.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=3.5 tests=BAYES_44,NO_REAL_NAME, PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Level: * Cc: Subject: [Samba] Wall Alarm X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3 Precedence: list Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Id: General questions regarding Samba samba.lists.samba.org List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] spam
yes i have gotton this email twice in the last three days as well its someone posing as a samba user then posting spam or has hacked the mailing list somehow :(( Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3.0.1 Fedora Linux compilation error
Hi, I am getting following error message, when compiling samba 3.0.1 source rpm on fedora Linux. I was able to compile samba 3.0.0 successfully. Error message: rpmbuild -ba samba.spec Compiling rpc_parse/parse_misc.c with -fPIC Compiling libsmb/unexpected.c with -fPIC_wins.so debug2html Compiling libsmb/namecache.c with -fPIC Compiling libsmb/nmblib.c with -fPIC Compiling libsmb/namequery.c with -fPIC Compiling libsmb/conncache.c with -fPIC Compiling libads/kerberos.c with -fPIC libads/kerberos.c: In function `kerberos_kinit_password': libads/kerberos.c:84: warning: passing arg 6 of `krb5_get_init_creds_password' iscards qualifiers from pointer target type Linking nsswitch/libnss_wins.so collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [nsswitch/libnss_wins.so] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.18912 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.18912 (%build) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] spam
More specifically, it's a spam message that was crafted carefully enough to pass the (usually very effective) spam filters on the list. I'm sure the filters will be updated in good time. Patience, folks. This really isn't worth the blood pressure medication. On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 08:10:36AM -0800, Paul Valley wrote: yes i have gotton this email twice in the last three days as well its someone posing as a samba user then posting spam or has hacked the mailing list somehow :(( Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] uncovering groupmap problems
On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 07:46, Stphane Purnelle wrote: dn: cn=Domain Users,ou=Groups,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: sambaGroupMapping gidNumber: 513 cn: Domain Users description: Netbios Domain Users sambaSID: S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-513 sambaGroupType: 2 displayName: Domain Users dn: cn=root,ou=Group,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: top cn: root gidNumber: 0 I see in this desciption that root is in sub-tree ou=Group and Domain Users is in sub-tree ou=Groups, it's normal or not ? Yes, that is how I thought it was supposed to work. Thus all of the group info migrated from /etc/group went into ou=Group and all of the group info migrated from smbldap-populate.pl and hence-forth via LDAP assignments went into ou=Groups No? Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem Restarting Samba3
I have Samba 3.0.0 installed on Mandrake 9.2. I also have Samba 2.8.8a installed per instructions from Mandrake -- but I do NOT start Samba 2.8.8a automatically. In fact, I don't use it at all. Maybe I should uninstall the Samba 2.8.8a rpm??? I will update to 3.0.1 as soon as an rpm is available from Mandrake. Anyway, I have a problem when I try to add a new share to my smb.conf file. I can't make it accessible to my Windows machines unless I reboot the Linux box. Simple restarting Samba3 doesn't do the trick (I think it's making Samba 2.2.8a START after shutting down Samba 3.0.0). Is there any trick to adding new shares and making them accessible to Windows without restarting either Samba3 or the whole server? And if I have to restart Samba3 -- and if I succeed in making it really restart -- won't that disconnect Windows users who are already connected to the server? Thanks for your advice. Andy Liebman -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Problem Restarting Samba3
Le lun 22/12/2003 à 16:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Is there any trick to adding new shares and making them accessible to Windows without restarting either Samba3 or the whole server? it doesn't usually take more than a killall -HUP smbd -- *** [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP public key: http://www.amakuru.net/dmorel.asc 28192ef126bc871757cb7d97f4a44536 signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?= -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Unknow socket option report
Hello, From smb.conf man page: You may find that on some systems Samba will say Unknown socket option when you supply an option. This means you either incorrectly typed it or you need to add an include file to includes.h for your OS. If the latter is the case please send the patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. I'm exactly in that situation: I'm getting Unknown socket options messages in the log.smbd (is there any way to know exactly which socket option is failing?), but I don't know how to edit includes.h to fix it... Some pointer to related documentation about this problem? My samba version is 3.0.1rc1. My OS is a (very :) conventional Linux system (SuSE 8.2, with the default kernel 2.4.20-4GB). My socket options parameter is: socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=4096 SO_RCVBUF=4096 Thanks! -- Fermín -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] uncovering groupmap problems
And in your smb.conf what group suffix have you specified ? Craig White a crit : On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 07:46, Stphane Purnelle wrote: dn: cn=Domain Users,ou=Groups,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: sambaGroupMapping gidNumber: 513 cn: Domain Users description: Netbios Domain Users sambaSID: S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-513 sambaGroupType: 2 displayName: Domain Users dn: cn=root,ou=Group,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: top cn: root gidNumber: 0 I see in this desciption that root is in sub-tree ou=Group and Domain Users is in sub-tree ou=Groups, it's normal or not ? Yes, that is how I thought it was supposed to work. Thus all of the group info migrated from /etc/group went into ou=Group and all of the group info migrated from smbldap-populate.pl and hence-forth via LDAP assignments went into ou=Groups No? Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] 3.0.1 problem with domain authentication.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jason Gauthier wrote: | User jgauthier does not exist, trying to add it winbind is not setup correctly and is not returning a uid for this user. There have so numerous threads on this in the past. cheers, jerry ~ -- ~ Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com ~ SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org ~ GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ~ If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song --Switchfoot (2003) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/5xk9IR7qMdg1EfYRAusdAKC7cKMmK0PtZUKmzBL6LuJXJ8DSRwCg7utP lvWD2ezR9Ud+G6AVGHJTyxw= =LfWt -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Printing OK on 98, Access denied on XP Pro
John H Terpstra wrote: Try adding to [global]: guest only = Yes Hrm, it works now. Happy! I've got to give it to you, Mister Terpstra, you seem to have a lot of the answers up your sleeve (lucky foir the rest of us). Thanks again. -wde -- Will Enestvedt UNIX System Administrator Johnson Wales University -- Providence, RI -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] uncovering groupmap problems
On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 09:12, Stphane Purnelle wrote: On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 07:46, Stphane Purnelle wrote: dn: cn=Domain Users,ou=Groups,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: sambaGroupMapping gidNumber: 513 cn: Domain Users description: Netbios Domain Users sambaSID: S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-513 sambaGroupType: 2 displayName: Domain Users dn: cn=root,ou=Group,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: top cn: root gidNumber: 0 I see in this desciption that root is in sub-tree ou=Group and Domain Users is in sub-tree ou=Groups, it's normal or not ? Yes, that is how I thought it was supposed to work. Thus all of the group info migrated from /etc/group went into ou=Group and all of the group info migrated from smbldap-populate.pl and hence-forth via LDAP assignments went into ou=Groups No? And in your smb.conf what group suffix have you specified ? --- moved top post to bottom for continuity... ldap group suffix = ou=Groups ldap user suffix = ou=People ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] uncovering groupmap problems
Craig White a crit : On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 09:12, Stphane Purnelle wrote: On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 07:46, Stphane Purnelle wrote: dn: cn=Domain Users,ou=Groups,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: sambaGroupMapping gidNumber: 513 cn: Domain Users description: Netbios Domain Users sambaSID: S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-513 sambaGroupType: 2 displayName: Domain Users dn: cn=root,ou=Group,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: top cn: root gidNumber: 0 I see in this desciption that root is in sub-tree ou=Group and Domain Users is in sub-tree ou=Groups, it's normal or not ? Yes, that is how I thought it was supposed to work. Thus all of the group info migrated from /etc/group went into ou=Group and all of the group info migrated from smbldap-populate.pl and hence-forth via LDAP assignments went into ou=Groups No? And in your smb.conf what group suffix have you specified ? --- moved top post to bottom for continuity... ldap group suffix = ou=Groups ldap user suffix = ou=People ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers Craig Ok, I think that is the problem, samba try to modfiy group root and cannot midify because is in ou=group. Samba search in ou = groups Can you try your command after moved dn: cn=root,ou=Group,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: top cn: root gidNumber: 0 TO dn: cn=root,ou=Groups,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: top cn: root gidNumber: 0 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] uncovering groupmap problems
On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 09:24, Stphane Purnelle wrote: Craig White a crit : On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 09:12, Stphane Purnelle wrote: On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 07:46, Stphane Purnelle wrote: dn: cn=Domain Users,ou=Groups,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: sambaGroupMapping gidNumber: 513 cn: Domain Users description: Netbios Domain Users sambaSID: S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-513 sambaGroupType: 2 displayName: Domain Users dn: cn=root,ou=Group,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: top cn: root gidNumber: 0 I see in this desciption that root is in sub-tree ou=Group and Domain Users is in sub-tree ou=Groups, it's normal or not ? Yes, that is how I thought it was supposed to work. Thus all of the group info migrated from /etc/group went into ou=Group and all of the group info migrated from smbldap-populate.pl and hence-forth via LDAP assignments went into ou=Groups No? And in your smb.conf what group suffix have you specified ? --- moved top post to bottom for continuity... ldap group suffix = ou=Groups ldap user suffix = ou=People ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers Craig Ok, I think that is the problem, samba try to modfiy group root and cannot midify because is in ou=group. Samba search in ou = groups Can you try your command after moved dn: cn=root,ou=Group,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: top cn: root gidNumber: 0 TO dn: cn=root,ou=Groups,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: top cn: root gidNumber: 0 --- added new record cn=root,ou=Groups,o=Mullen,c=US (left the other in Group) close but still didn't work # net groupmap modify ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=root net: ../../../libraries/liblber/decode.c:500: ber_scanf: Assertion `((ber)-ber_opts.lbo_valid==0x2)' failed. Aborted [EMAIL PROTECTED] migration]# net groupmap modify sid=S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-512 ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=root type=domain net: ../../../libraries/liblber/decode.c:500: ber_scanf: Assertion `((ber)-ber_opts.lbo_valid==0x2)' failed. Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] W98 abnormal behaviour
Hi all, i've got a strange behaviour with W98 workstations : I've samba3 running as a PDC on an heterogeneous network. it's used for authentication only and profiles are disabled so we use the local profile on workstation. the configuration works fine for Win2k and XP. But on W98, it get an standard profile from an unknown place and manage to write it on the server... here is my config, if any idea ... [global] dos charset = 850 unix charset = ISO8859-15 workgroup = DOMAIN server string = Serveur min passwd length = 0 username map = /etc/samba/smbusers log level = 3 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 50 announce version = 5.5 name resolve order = wins host lmhosts bcast socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g samba -s /bin/false -M %m$ logon path = logon home = \\%L\%U domain logons = Yes os level = 256 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins server = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 veto files = /lost+found/.*/ [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No browseable = No [Netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /var/lib/samba/netlogon browseable = No share modes = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes browseable = No [ressources] comment = Ressources path = /ressources valid users = +samba force user = samba force group = samba read only = No -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Problem Restarting Samba3
Not even. New shares are available immediately AFAIK. At least the were in 2.2.x. Greg On Monday 22 December 2003 10:55 am, David Morel wrote: Le lun 22/12/2003 à 16:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Is there any trick to adding new shares and making them accessible to Windows without restarting either Samba3 or the whole server? it doesn't usually take more than a killall -HUP smbd -- Greg Dickie just a guy Maximum Throughput -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] uncovering groupmap problems
Craig White a crit : On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 09:24, Stphane Purnelle wrote: Craig White a crit : On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 09:12, Stphane Purnelle wrote: On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 07:46, Stphane Purnelle wrote: dn: cn=Domain Users,ou=Groups,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: sambaGroupMapping gidNumber: 513 cn: Domain Users description: Netbios Domain Users sambaSID: S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-513 sambaGroupType: 2 displayName: Domain Users dn: cn=root,ou=Group,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: top cn: root gidNumber: 0 I see in this desciption that root is in sub-tree ou=Group and Domain Users is in sub-tree ou=Groups, it's normal or not ? Yes, that is how I thought it was supposed to work. Thus all of the group info migrated from /etc/group went into ou=Group and all of the group info migrated from smbldap-populate.pl and hence-forth via LDAP assignments went into ou=Groups No? And in your smb.conf what group suffix have you specified ? --- moved top post to bottom for continuity... ldap group suffix = ou=Groups ldap user suffix = ou=People ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers Craig Ok, I think that is the problem, samba try to modfiy group root and cannot midify because is in ou=group. Samba search in ou = groups Can you try your command after moved dn: cn=root,ou=Group,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: top cn: root gidNumber: 0 TO dn: cn=root,ou=Groups,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: top cn: root gidNumber: 0 --- added new record cn=root,ou=Groups,o=Mullen,c=US (left the other in Group) close but still didn't work # net groupmap modify ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=root net: ../../../libraries/liblber/decode.c:500: ber_scanf: Assertion `((ber)-ber_opts.lbo_valid==0x2)' failed. Aborted [EMAIL PROTECTED] migration]# net groupmap modify sid=S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-512 ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=root type=domain net: ../../../libraries/liblber/decode.c:500: ber_scanf: Assertion `((ber)-ber_opts.lbo_valid==0x2)' failed. Craig Why you use net groupmap modify, if the first groupmapping of root group, I must use $ net groupmap add sid=S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-512 ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=root type=domain If it don't work, I think you can put a bug in bugzilla. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Notice for you
..::: Drunk Young :::... http://210.101.95.254/drunk-young Click here to Join Drunk Young will take you to the new level of excitement. It is a guarantee of Your pleasure, because we choose models very seriously carefully, depending on you offers and suggestions. 'Drunk Young' is regularly updates to bring you more and more sweet nymphets 100% satisfaction guarantee, with unique content of shiny floral girls. That's why we have very high percentage of monthly rebills. Every day we take new pictures and videos at our own studio. At summer we often making photo sessions in country side, villages and also in another countys. Every week we update site content with fresh faces never been seen before. We offer you. 1. Exclusive content, just from our studio, with young pretty (some of them drunk :) girls: at least more than 66 boys and girls models. 2. Thousands of original pictures are the crystal clear quality and hi-resolution 1024 X 768 or more. All videos are in DivX format(DVD quality). 3. We choose models depending on you offers and suggestions. 4. EVERY 3-5 DAYS we add new content with new girls and boys! 5. All video in the members area can be saved directly to your hard-drive. 6. 24*7 responsive support: you can ask questions and express your wishes any time at our forum, we have what to discuss. I control support team everyday. 7. Many thanks for our hoster, you'll have super-fast and reliable connection with our server. and the last, but not the least reason: 8. 100 % confidentiality of your personal data. All transactions are 100% safe secure. http://210.101.95.254/drunk-young Click here to Join zone.hoha.ru/unsubscribe Click here to unsubscribe -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] uncovering groupmap problems
On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 10:09, Stphane Purnelle wrote: Craig White a crit : On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 09:24, Stphane Purnelle wrote: Craig White a crit : On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 09:12, Stphane Purnelle wrote: On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 07:46, Stphane Purnelle wrote: dn: cn=Domain Users,ou=Groups,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: sambaGroupMapping gidNumber: 513 cn: Domain Users description: Netbios Domain Users sambaSID: S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-513 sambaGroupType: 2 displayName: Domain Users dn: cn=root,ou=Group,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: top cn: root gidNumber: 0 I see in this desciption that root is in sub-tree ou=Group and Domain Users is in sub-tree ou=Groups, it's normal or not ? Yes, that is how I thought it was supposed to work. Thus all of the group info migrated from /etc/group went into ou=Group and all of the group info migrated from smbldap-populate.pl and hence-forth via LDAP assignments went into ou=Groups No? And in your smb.conf what group suffix have you specified ? --- moved top post to bottom for continuity... ldap group suffix = ou=Groups ldap user suffix = ou=People ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers Craig Ok, I think that is the problem, samba try to modfiy group root and cannot midify because is in ou=group. Samba search in ou = groups Can you try your command after moved dn: cn=root,ou=Group,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: top cn: root gidNumber: 0 TO dn: cn=root,ou=Groups,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: top cn: root gidNumber: 0 --- added new record cn=root,ou=Groups,o=Mullen,c=US (left the other in Group) close but still didn't work # net groupmap modify ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=root net: ../../../libraries/liblber/decode.c:500: ber_scanf: Assertion `((ber)-ber_opts.lbo_valid==0x2)' failed. Aborted [EMAIL PROTECTED] migration]# net groupmap modify sid=S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-512 ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=root type=domain net: ../../../libraries/liblber/decode.c:500: ber_scanf: Assertion `((ber)-ber_opts.lbo_valid==0x2)' failed. Craig Why you use net groupmap modify, if the first groupmapping of root group, I must use $ net groupmap add sid=S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-512 ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=root type=domain If it don't work, I think you can put a bug in bugzilla. --- Duh... thank you so much - you are very sharp. ;-) Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Problem Restarting Samba3
Sounds like you may not be stopping the smbd3 competely. How are you stopping the service? Do verify that the smbd3 is stopped: ps -ae | grep smbd3 Also, here are the latest Mandrake RMPS for Samba: http://ranger.dnsalias.com/mandrake/9.2/samba-3.0.1 Good luck, TJ On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 15:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have Samba 3.0.0 installed on Mandrake 9.2. I also have Samba 2.8.8a installed per instructions from Mandrake -- but I do NOT start Samba 2.8.8a automatically. In fact, I don't use it at all. Maybe I should uninstall the Samba 2.8.8a rpm??? I will update to 3.0.1 as soon as an rpm is available from Mandrake. Anyway, I have a problem when I try to add a new share to my smb.conf file. I can't make it accessible to my Windows machines unless I reboot the Linux box. Simple restarting Samba3 doesn't do the trick (I think it's making Samba 2.2.8a START after shutting down Samba 3.0.0). Is there any trick to adding new shares and making them accessible to Windows without restarting either Samba3 or the whole server? And if I have to restart Samba3 -- and if I succeed in making it really restart -- won't that disconnect Windows users who are already connected to the server? Thanks for your advice. Andy Liebman -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba Win2k problem
I have a samba server version 2.2.7a-8.9.0 running on RedHat 9.0. It is acting as a domain controller. I have some win2k clients logging in to this domain and mapping home shares, shared drives, etc. The network the servers are on is 1000Mb and the client networks are all 100Mb. The client networks are linked via 1000Mb uplink. The problem I'm having is that when a user copies a fair number of files (197 files equalling 34 MB in this case) from a mapped share J: to another directory on that same share, about 3/4 of the way through the copy, the share shows disconnected (a red x on the share mapping, and net use shows 'DisconnectedJ:'. Seems as though it's related to this: [2003/12/22 11:10:55, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(677) asim0369 (192.168.1.64) closed connection to service SYS [2003/12/22 11:10:55, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection(331) Invalid username/password for sys [smbguest] [2003/12/22 11:10:55, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection(331) Invalid username/password for sys [smbguest] [2003/12/22 11:10:55, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection(331) Invalid username/password for sys [smbguest] [2003/12/22 11:10:55, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection(331) Invalid username/password for sys [smbguest] [2003/12/22 11:10:55, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(636) asim0369 (192.168.1.64) connect to service SYS as user tomd (uid=10001, gid=10011) (pid 26701) Once these entries appear in the log, the share shows up as disconnected. I can still work in the share, add/modify/delete and so on, but the red X remains usually until I manually disconnect/reconnect(and sometimes that doesn't work). Also, why is win2k apparently connecting as nobody/smbguest(not sending user/pass?) first, and then later connect as the logged in user? Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Tom Dangler Here's my smb.conf: [global] workgroup = WORKGROUPNAME netbios name = SAMBASERVER server string = FILE SERVER log level=2 domain admin group = @administrators @domainadmins printcap name = cups load printers = yes printing = cups guest account = smbguest log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 0 security = user password level = 8 username level = 8 encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd unix password sync = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* pam password change = yes obey pam restrictions = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 os level = 99 preferred master = yes domain logons = yes logon drive = G: logon home = \\SAMBASERVER\%U show add printer wizard = yes logon script = %U.bat add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false -M %u # Share Definitions == #the affected share [SHARED] security mask = 2777 create mask = 2775 directory mask = 2775 comment = SHARED path = /shared writable = yes printable = no public = no -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] uncovering groupmap problems
I see in this desciption that root is in sub-tree ou=Group and Domain Users is in sub-tree ou=Groups, it's normal or not ? Yes, that is how I thought it was supposed to work. Thus all of the group info migrated from /etc/group went into ou=Group and all of the group info migrated from smbldap-populate.pl and hence-forth via LDAP assignments went into ou=Groups OK - I guess I now have to clarify one final thought. Apparently Linux stores 'groups' in a named called 'group' and Samba pictures things as 'groups' Thinking that my target is a single structure in LDAP for authentication for both Samba and other posix services it doesn't make sense to have both. My initial foray had me changing everything (samba smbldap_conf.pm, nsswitch/ldap.conf, smb.conf into Group ou and it seemed to work but since I need to have a domain_trust relationship with another WindowsNT driven domain, it seemed that the ou Groups would provide symmetry and user in the 'Accounting' Groups on the LinDomain would be accepted by the WinDomain as also Accounting (perhaps the RID needed to match - which brings up a whole 'nother security issue right?) Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Unknow socket option report
Folks, It should not be necessary to add the socket options parameter to systems with Linux kernel 2.4 or later. - John T. On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, [iso-8859-1] Fermín Galán wrote: Hello, From smb.conf man page: You may find that on some systems Samba will say Unknown socket option when you supply an option. This means you either incorrectly typed it or you need to add an include file to includes.h for your OS. If the latter is the case please send the patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. I'm exactly in that situation: I'm getting Unknown socket options messages in the log.smbd (is there any way to know exactly which socket option is failing?), but I don't know how to edit includes.h to fix it... Some pointer to related documentation about this problem? My samba version is 3.0.1rc1. My OS is a (very :) conventional Linux system (SuSE 8.2, with the default kernel 2.4.20-4GB). My socket options parameter is: socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=4096 SO_RCVBUF=4096 Thanks! -- Fermín -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Printing OK on 98, Access denied on XP Pro
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, William Enestvedt wrote: John H Terpstra wrote: Try adding to [global]: guest only = Yes Hrm, it works now. Happy! I've got to give it to you, Mister Terpstra, you seem to have a lot of the answers up your sleeve (lucky foir the rest of us). Thanks again. Blush! :) - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problems with printers
I have samba 3.0.1 running and have successfully set it up to be a print spooler, which is working great, until I tried to add more than 5 printers. I am using cups, using the cups web interface to add printers, today I added 2 more printers. They do not show up in samba, I have restarted cups, smb nmb, everything except the machine itself. Samba is set to load /etc/printcap printers, my /etc/printcap is as follows. # This file was automatically generated by cupsd(8) from the # /etc/cups/printers.conf file. All changes to this file # will be lost. 7th_Dock_Laser: Edgeley_Inkjet: Edgeley_Laser: Eng_Laser: Eng_Laser_Color: Front_Office_Big_Laser: Front_Office_Laser: Michigan_Plotter: Any ideas why only the 1st 5 printers show up in samba? Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Printers and other stuff
Well.. okay. Only printers. I am still having issues (pains, actually) getting my pritner shares to work from either Linux OR Windows 2000. One of the things I see here is that the majority of users use CUPS as the printing daemon. From my previous Unix experieince, I have gravitated towards BSD as my printing daemon. Could this be the reason I am having trouble Does Samba work better with CUPS as opposed to BSD? Inquiring minds want to know. Joe Cipale -- #--# # Penguinix Consulting # #--# #Software development, QA and testing. # #Linux support and training. # #Don't fear the penguin! # #--# # Registered Linux user: #309247 http://counter.li.org # #--# -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Problems with printers
I am using cups, using the cups web interface to add printers, today I added 2 more printers. They do not show up in samba, I have restarted cups, smb nmb, everything except the machine itself. By, They do not show up in samba, is that from the Samba or Windows client? Sometimes Windows take a bit to notice, for best results try: smbclient -L localhost -U [user] and see if they show up. Do you have a [printers] share and a load printers = Yes? If not you need to add print share explicitly in smb.conf. ~ Daniel --- This message is the property of Time Inc. or its affiliates. It may be legally privileged and/or confidential and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s). No addressee should forward, print, copy, or otherwise reproduce this message in any manner that would allow it to be viewed by any individual not originally listed as a recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this message. Thank you. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Printers and other stuff
Joe C. wrote: Could this be the reason I am having trouble? Does Samba work better with CUPS as opposed to BSD? Inquiring minds want to know. Well, I'm publishig a couple of Solaris printer queues out via Smaba with few enough pains. And, to up the ante, I'm going to start managing the quqwued jobs with a program called Xi-Text. So no, CUPS isn't the _only_ game in town -- but there's a lot more players at that table than any other. :7) -wde -- Will Enestvedt UNIX System Administrator Johnson Wales University -- Providence, RI -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] uncovering groupmap problems
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, [UTF-8] Stphane Purnelle wrote: Why you use net groupmap modify, if the first groupmapping of root group, I must use $ net groupmap add sid=S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-512 ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=root type=domain If it don't work, I think you can put a bug in bugzilla. Precisely what is the bug? Domain Users should have RID=513, not 512. RID=512 is Domain Admins If you want to change the RID you will have to delete the group and re-add it. Please help me to userstand: 1. How was the NT Group created? - If LDAP backend then you created it manually - If tdbsam backend, it is auto-created 2. How did it get to the setting you have now Using LDAP backend I just did the following: smbldap-groupadd.pl -g 560 -t domain -r 560 sammy net groupmap list Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-512) - Domain Admins Domain Users (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-513) - Domain Users Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-514) - Domain Guests Accounts (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-3001) - Accounts Finances (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-3003) - Finances PIOps (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-3005) - PIOps sammy (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-560) - sammy Using tdbsam backend I just did: groupadd sammy net groupmap add ntgroup=Domain Sammy unixgroup=sammy type=d rid=560 net groumap list System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) - -1 Replicators (S-1-5-32-552) - -1 Guests (S-1-5-32-546) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-513) - users Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-512) - root Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-514) - nobody Domain Sammy (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-560) - sammy Power Users (S-1-5-32-547) - -1 Master (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-2001) - master Print Operators (S-1-5-32-550) - -1 Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) - -1 Account Operators (S-1-5-32-548) - -1 Backup Operators (S-1-5-32-551) - -1 Users (S-1-5-32-545) - -1 Think about this. If you have entries for a group that has the wrong RID, there are lots of mapping entries for this in: group_mapping.tdb (if not using LDAP) winbindd_cachine.tdb winbindd_idmap.tdb LDAP To intelligently change a RID, Samba will need to search for all occurances of the RID and change it. There is a large element of risk of loss o data consistency while that change is happening. The safest strategy is to delete a bad entry and then re-add it correctly. Now check this (with tdbsam): net groupmap delete ntgroup=Domain Users net groupmap list System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) - -1 Replicators (S-1-5-32-552) - -1 Guests (S-1-5-32-546) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-513) - -1 Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-512) - root Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-514) - nobody Power Users (S-1-5-32-547) - -1 Master (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-2001) - master Print Operators (S-1-5-32-550) - -1 Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-1201) - users Account Operators (S-1-5-32-548) - -1 Backup Operators (S-1-5-32-551) - -1 Users (S-1-5-32-545) - -1 Notice that Domain Uses is automatically added by the tdbsam backend! That is why you can not remap the RID for the well-known groups. With an LDAP backend: net groupmap delete ntgroup=Domain Users net groupmap add ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=Domain Users rid=513 This works fine. The LDAP backend does NOT auto-add the well known groups. But you cannot change the RID once it is added. You can delete a group mapping and then re-add it. So precisely, what is the bug? I have seen the head-banging over the week-end and still do not understand what the problem is. - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Problems with printers
Rob, Sorry. Not enough information. What is in your smb.conf? Have are the printers set up? Are you using Raw interface on CUPS? - If so, did you enable application/octet-stream in CUPS /etc/cups/mime* Was samba-3.0.1 compiled and linked against the cups-devel libraries? - to find out run: smbd -b | grep CUPS If you have CUPS, you should not be using /etc/printcap at all. Samba talks directly to CUPS via a direct printing API. - John T. On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Rob Sell wrote: I have samba 3.0.1 running and have successfully set it up to be a print spooler, which is working great, until I tried to add more than 5 printers. I am using cups, using the cups web interface to add printers, today I added 2 more printers. They do not show up in samba, I have restarted cups, smb nmb, everything except the machine itself. Samba is set to load /etc/printcap printers, my /etc/printcap is as follows. # This file was automatically generated by cupsd(8) from the # /etc/cups/printers.conf file. All changes to this file # will be lost. 7th_Dock_Laser: Edgeley_Inkjet: Edgeley_Laser: Eng_Laser: Eng_Laser_Color: Front_Office_Big_Laser: Front_Office_Laser: Michigan_Plotter: Any ideas why only the 1st 5 printers show up in samba? Rob -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] uncovering groupmap problems
On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 11:16, John H Terpstra wrote: On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, [UTF-8] Stphane Purnelle wrote: Why you use net groupmap modify, if the first groupmapping of root group, I must use $ net groupmap add sid=S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-512 ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=root type=domain If it don't work, I think you can put a bug in bugzilla. Precisely what is the bug? Domain Users should have RID=513, not 512. RID=512 is Domain Admins notabug - problem solved (groupmap) - have to go back and wrestle with net rpc trustdom (which did work at first - until I reloaded LDAP and user$) stupid operator at helm - I caught that myself - thankfully, now that I understand things, I can net groupmap modify as well as add. of course, making all of the Domain Users administrators makes it easier for the users... Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Printers and other stuff
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Joe Cipale wrote: Well.. okay. Only printers. I am still having issues (pains, actually) getting my pritner shares to work from either Linux OR Windows 2000. One of the things I see here is that the majority of users use CUPS as the printing daemon. From my previous Unix experieince, I have gravitated towards BSD as my printing daemon. Could this be the reason I am having trouble Does Samba work better with CUPS as opposed to BSD? Inquiring minds want to know. Both work. With BSD LPR/LPD you have to specific the if= line to call smbprint. You also have to configure it. Look inside it. With CUPS life is in fact simpler, but from the noise on this list one wonders sometimes. :( For CUPS: Just make sure that you enable application/octet-stream in the /etc/cups/mime.* files. CUPS is transparent. Samba communicates with it via a direct API - IF samba has been compiled and linked with the cups-devel libraries. In this case, it does not use or require any interface scripts. - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] User validation in domain different than workgroup
Hello all, First of all, I'm really a newbie in Samba. I can manage to setup the Samba server in security = user, and now I'm trying to do a more complicated thing. I wish the Samba server to be our domain master in group COMOPT, that is workgroup = COMPOPT. I do not want to have Linux user accounts for the users, but rather to validate them using another domain server, whose domain is UPVNET, and then map all the connections to the shares to a single Linux user for all of them. I'm a little bit confused, because it seems I must use security = domain and winbind, but then workgroup should be UPVNET rather than COMOPT, that is the one I want. Sorry in advance for this little mess. Maybe I'm asking something that makes no sense. Can any one help me? Thanks in advance. Pascual. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smbldap Tools problem
Hi
I had the same problems.
I modified the smbldap-scripts in order to
get the right chat (commenting out first print line and adding OK at the
end, see a: and b: at the end of the mail)
passwd program = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-passwd.pl_unix %u
passwd chat = *ew*password* %n\n *ew*password* %n\n *OK*
I recognized, that changing password from an Windows Workstation doesn't
work.
(or, it works with an error on the client side)
Therefore I made a new smbldap-passwd.pl_unix, in which I set samba=2 in
the if statment (see c:),
which changes only the unix part
and the error went away.
It not nice, but it seems to work...
If I should send you the modified scripts of-list, give me a note.
Greetings
Hansjörg
a:
#print Changing password for $user\n;
b:
print OK\n;
# take down session
$ldap_master-unbind;
c:
if ($samba == 2) {
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
I want to thanks all people here for their help, good job guys! :o)
And nox, it's my question:
I'm using smbldap-tools 0.8.2 from samba.idealx.org. In all the docs I read
about it, I read that I must put these lines in smb.conf:
passwd program = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-passwd.pl -o %u
passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *successfully*
I look in the code of the Perl script, and I saw 2 things:
1- there's no -o option
2- there no print (like successfully) when the end is OK, just nothing
3- the first new is New, beware of the case, its (very) sensitive
And my question is: how is everybody able to use smbldap-tools without any
modifications (except for smbldap_conf.pm ofcourse) ???
--
Dr. Hansjörg Maurer
itsystems Deutschland AG
Linprunstr. 10
D-80335 München
Ph/Fax +49 89 52 04 68-41/-59
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] User validation in domain different than workgroup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm not entirely sure I understand. You want your users to be validated against the UPVNET domain controller, right? How does COMOPT come into then? Is COMOPT the domain root, and UPVNET a branch ( or subforest, or whatever they call it )? From Samba's perspective, it shouldn't matter the relationship: Point samba to UPVNET as the DC, and let the win2k boxes work themselves out. Please let me know if I got what you want wrong. Pascual Muñoz wrote: Hello all, First of all, I'm really a newbie in Samba. I can manage to setup the Samba server in security = user, and now I'm trying to do a more complicated thing. I wish the Samba server to be our domain master in group COMOPT, that is workgroup = COMPOPT. I do not want to have Linux user accounts for the users, but rather to validate them using another domain server, whose domain is UPVNET, and then map all the connections to the shares to a single Linux user for all of them. I'm a little bit confused, because it seems I must use security = domain and winbind, but then workgroup should be UPVNET rather than COMOPT, that is the one I want. Sorry in advance for this little mess. Maybe I'm asking something that makes no sense. Can any one help me? Thanks in advance. Pascual. - -- Sean Kennedy PGP public key: http://tpno.org/keys/0xFC1C377F.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1-nr1 (Windows 2000) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD4DBQE/5z9xIjyA6vwcN38RAnPOAJQPCHtvRM2qHZk4tpwLwWNQUeRjAJ9GSbzX 0ZeKGMX9V0L2ePLSYOQ0wA== =TziP -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Problems with printers
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] Problems with printers
I am using cups, using the cups web interface to add
printers, today I added 2 more printers. They do not
show up in samba, I have restarted cups, smb
nmb, everything except the machine itself.
By, They do not show up in samba, is that from the
Samba or Windows client? Sometimes Windows take a bit
to notice, for best results try: smbclient -L localhost
-U [user] and see if they show up.
Do you have a [printers] share and a load printers = Yes?
If not you need to add print share explicitly in smb.conf.
~ Daniel
-
Dan,
They do not show up using smbclient either. I have a printers share, and I
have load printers set to yes.
-
John,
Samba was compiled but not linked against cups. I didn't have the mime stuff
set in cups, I do now. But why does samba pick up my 5 printers without
being linked to cups?
Below is my smb.conf
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from 192.1.1.100 (192.1.1.100)
# Date: 2003/12/22 13:05:38
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = DAC
interfaces = 192.1.1.60/255.255.255.0
security = DOMAIN
map to guest = Bad User
password server = dc
log level = 1
syslog = 0
time server = Yes
socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY
os level = 2
preferred master = No
local master = No
domain master = No
ldap ssl = no
admin users = robs
printer admin = robs
printing = cups
veto files = /*.eml/*.nws/riched20.dll/*.{*}/
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = %S
read only = No
create mask = 0640
directory mask = 0750
browseable = No
[tmp]
comment = Temp Directories
path = /tmp/
read only = No
guest ok = Yes
[cgi]
path = /srv/www/cgi-bin/
read only = No
guest ok = Yes
[www]
path = /srv/www/htdocs/
read only = No
guest ok = Yes
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/tmp
printer admin = root, robs
create mask = 0600
guest ok = Yes
printable = Yes
[print$]
comment = Printer Drivers
path = /usr/local/samba/var/locks/printing
write list = @ntadmin, root, robs
force group = ntadmin
read only = No
create mask = 0664
directory mask = 0775
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Solaris printing command question
Hello, anyone still working this week; I've got a couple of printers shared out from a Sun server, running Solaris 8 2/02 and Samba 3.0.1, and it's peachy. Can anyone tell me a way to get the _client's_ job title included in the print command? I tried dropping a '-t %J' at the end of a 'print command' directiovein smb.conf, but the jobs only list the uninformative Remote for the title. (Insert Nelson_laugh here.) Also, the '-t' argument to lp is uspposed ot print tat title on the banner page, and I won't be havng any banner pages, thankyouverymuch. I have a job control program that shows me the title of the job, but I can't get anything like the name of the active document or program -- and things like smbprn.00010.kLaGYI are worse than useless. :7) Thanks for your time. -wde -- Will Enestvedt UNIX System Administrator Johnson Wales University -- Providence, RI -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problems with Samba 3.0.1 authenticating through AD
Hello, I am trying to set up Samba 3.0.1 to be a member of Active Directory. The setup is very simple: There is one Windows 2003 AD server on the network. Samba is running on FreeBSD 5.1R. So far, I can successfully join the domain (using net ads join -U Administrator), and I can use kinit / smbclient successfully against the Windows domain controller (kinit [EMAIL PROTECTED] followed by smbclient -L \\host -k). However, whenever I try to authenticate against the machine running Samba from a Windows domain client, I get prompted for a username and password. Even if I enter in a valid domain username and password, Samba says that the password is incorrect. Here is my smb.conf: [global] server string = Samba 3.0 security = ads load printers = yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 500 workgroup = REQUEST realm = CORP.REQUEST.COM encrypt passwords = yes debuglevel = 100 socket options = TCP_NODELAY local master = no wins support = yes wins server = 10.1.8.7 client use spnego = yes A full debug log can be found at http://www.aosda.net/samba.txt . I am confused by the fact that the logs seem to indicate it is using NTLM authentication - I thought with security = ads it was only supposed to use Kerberos? Also, is it possible to use security = ads along with nss_ldap (i.e. Samba would get a static uid/gid/etc from an AD server for local use)? I suppose I am a bit confused as to how these different parts work together. Essentially, I want statically mapped uid/gid's and usernames across all machines. Thanks for any help or pointers to documentation, -Justin -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] User validation in domain different than workgroup
Pascual, You need to use Samba-3.0.1, and then use Interdomain Trusts. See Samba-HOWTO chapter on that. http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf - John T. On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Pascual Muñoz wrote: Hello all, First of all, I'm really a newbie in Samba. I can manage to setup the Samba server in security = user, and now I'm trying to do a more complicated thing. I wish the Samba server to be our domain master in group COMOPT, that is workgroup = COMPOPT. I do not want to have Linux user accounts for the users, but rather to validate them using another domain server, whose domain is UPVNET, and then map all the connections to the shares to a single Linux user for all of them. I'm a little bit confused, because it seems I must use security = domain and winbind, but then workgroup should be UPVNET rather than COMOPT, that is the one I want. Sorry in advance for this little mess. Maybe I'm asking something that makes no sense. Can any one help me? Thanks in advance. Pascual. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Problems with printers
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Rob Sell wrote:
Dan,
They do not show up using smbclient either. I have a printers share, and I
have load printers set to yes.
-
John,
Samba was compiled but not linked against cups. I didn't have the mime stuff
set in cups, I do now. But why does samba pick up my 5 printers without
being linked to cups?
If samba was not linked with the cups-devel libraries, then do NOT set
printing = cups that will break things. You should either compile and
link against the cups-devel libraries, or else just use printing = bsd
or printing = sysv, depending on which commands you want to use.
If you use printing = sysv, then set printcap = lpstat -t.
Note: Only use printing = sysv if you have LPRng installed. This will
not work if your systems does not support the ATT command tools (lp,
lpstat).
- John T.
Below is my smb.conf
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from 192.1.1.100 (192.1.1.100)
# Date: 2003/12/22 13:05:38
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = DAC
interfaces = 192.1.1.60/255.255.255.0
security = DOMAIN
map to guest = Bad User
password server = dc
log level = 1
syslog = 0
time server = Yes
socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY
os level = 2
preferred master = No
local master = No
domain master = No
ldap ssl = no
admin users = robs
printer admin = robs
printing = cups
veto files = /*.eml/*.nws/riched20.dll/*.{*}/
...
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/tmp
printer admin = root, robs
create mask = 0600
guest ok = Yes
printable = Yes
[print$]
comment = Printer Drivers
path = /usr/local/samba/var/locks/printing
write list = @ntadmin, root, robs
force group = ntadmin
read only = No
create mask = 0664
directory mask = 0775
--
John H Terpstra
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Problems with printers
John Terpstra wrote: ...or else just use printing = bsd or printing = sysv, depending on which commands you want to use. If you use printing = sysv, then set printcap = lpstat -t. Note: Only use printing = sysv if you have LPRng installed. This will not work if your systems does not support the ATT command tools (lp, lpstat). So I'm running a job control application on top of Solaris. Am I better off using printing = sysv or printing = bsd? (The vendor actually suggested using Samba as my front end!) -wde -- Will Enestvedt UNIX System Administrator Johnson Wales University -- Providence, RI -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] uncovering groupmap problems
John H Terpstra a crit : On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, [UTF-8] Stphane Purnelle wrote: Why you use net groupmap modify, if the first groupmapping of root group, I must use $ net groupmap add sid=S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-512 ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=root type=domain If it don't work, I think you can put a bug in bugzilla. Precisely what is the bug? Domain Users should have RID=513, not 512. RID=512 is Domain Admins If you want to change the RID you will have to delete the group and re-add it. Please help me to userstand: 1. How was the NT Group created? - If LDAP backend then you created it manually - If tdbsam backend, it is auto-created 2. How did it get to the setting you have now Using LDAP backend I just did the following: smbldap-groupadd.pl -g 560 -t domain -r 560 sammy net groupmap list Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-512) - Domain Admins Domain Users (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-513) - Domain Users Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-514) - Domain Guests Accounts (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-3001) - Accounts Finances (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-3003) - Finances PIOps (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-3005) - PIOps sammy (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-560) - sammy Using tdbsam backend I just did: groupadd sammy net groupmap add ntgroup=Domain Sammy unixgroup=sammy type=d rid=560 net groumap list System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) - -1 Replicators (S-1-5-32-552) - -1 Guests (S-1-5-32-546) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-513) - users Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-512) - root Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-514) - nobody Domain Sammy (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-560) - sammy Power Users (S-1-5-32-547) - -1 Master (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-2001) - master Print Operators (S-1-5-32-550) - -1 Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) - -1 Account Operators (S-1-5-32-548) - -1 Backup Operators (S-1-5-32-551) - -1 Users (S-1-5-32-545) - -1 Think about this. If you have entries for a group that has the wrong RID, there are lots of mapping entries for this in: group_mapping.tdb (if not using LDAP) winbindd_cachine.tdb winbindd_idmap.tdb LDAP To intelligently change a RID, Samba will need to search for all occurances of the RID and change it. There is a large element of risk of loss o data consistency while that change is happening. The safest strategy is to delete a bad entry and then re-add it correctly. Now check this (with tdbsam): net groupmap delete ntgroup=Domain Users net groupmap list System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) - -1 Replicators (S-1-5-32-552) - -1 Guests (S-1-5-32-546) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-513) - -1 Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-512) - root Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-514) - nobody Power Users (S-1-5-32-547) - -1 Master (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-2001) - master Print Operators (S-1-5-32-550) - -1 Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-1201) - users Account Operators (S-1-5-32-548) - -1 Backup Operators (S-1-5-32-551) - -1 Users (S-1-5-32-545) - -1 Notice that Domain Uses is automatically added by the tdbsam backend! That is why you can not remap the RID for the well-known groups. With an LDAP backend: net groupmap delete ntgroup=Domain Users net groupmap add ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=Domain Users rid=513 This works fine. The LDAP backend does NOT auto-add the well known groups. But you cannot change the RID once it is added. You can delete a group mapping and then re-add it. So precisely, what is the bug? I have seen the head-banging over the week-end and still do not understand what the problem is. - John T. Ok, but # net groupmap modify ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=root net: ../../../libraries/liblber/decode.c:500: ber_scanf: Assertion `((ber)-ber_opts.lbo_valid==0x2)' failed. Aborted [EMAIL PROTECTED] migration]# net groupmap modify sid=S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-512 ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=root type=domain net: ../../../libraries/liblber/decode.c:500: ber_scanf: Assertion `((ber)-ber_opts.lbo_valid==0x2)' failed. Calling net groupmap modify, with no existing mapping is a user/administrator error Butn these messages not help the user. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smbldap Tools problem
Le Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:25:27AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a ecrit: Hi all! I want to thanks all people here for their help, good job guys! :o) And nox, it's my question: I'm using smbldap-tools 0.8.2 from samba.idealx.org. In all the docs I read about it, I read that I must put these lines in smb.conf: passwd program = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-passwd.pl -o %u passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *successfully* I'll have a look at the script. In any case, it is not useful to call this script. You can leave the default value and set: ldap passwd sync = Yes -- Jérôme Tournier IDEALX SAS Administrateur Systèmes 15-17 Avenue de Segur [EMAIL PROTECTED] 75007 PARIS Tel.: 01 44 42 00 53 Fax.: 01 44 42 00 01 gpg key ID: 0xDA962B24 (pgp.mit.edu) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3 as a Windows 2000 ADS Domain Member
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just a few pointers. Here's what I do. stop samba stop winbind edit smb.conf to have winbind stuff and domain stuff net join ads blahblahblah start winbind start samba wbinfo -p doesn't work, look at winbind logs and try again. :) James McDonald wrote: | Tom Dickson wrote: | | You still need UNIX users and groups, but you don't need to create | them by hand; winbind can take care of that for you. | | Other than the buzzword of ADS, there is not much different between | ADS and NT4 style auth (at least to the user, the protocals are | different). | | I'd look at the winbind chapter first. | | -Tom | | | OK thanks for the pointers Tom. I haven't even got winbind running and | it refuses to start at present so I will need to do some tinkering and | reading to get it going. | | -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/51bnRliD/69byygRAiN1AJ4mck/bihncGLvfYxYOinn/csrUfQCfXFI9 NPwbMb0D3B4i2yQk33ZMh4I= =YY4H -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] NTLM V2
Jeremy, Thank you for your response! Paul, We may want to do additional testing with both the client and server set for NTLM V2 authentication only. I can have the Samba version version ready for our USGS testing the first week after the holidays. Sam Martinez (303 236-1834) U.S. Geological Survey Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/20/2003 04:39 PM Please respond to Jeremy Allison To: Paul E Exter [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED], Samuel C Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED], Frank J Sager [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Willet D Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [Samba] NTLM V2 On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 06:18:26PM -0500, Paul E Exter wrote: It seems to be working with 2.something? Paul E. Exter IT Specialist Office of the Chief Technology Officer U.S. Geological Survey (410) 238 - 4234 Work (410) 375 - 0120 Cell I doubt you have it turned on on the server/client. It's a negotiated thing - definately not supported in Samba 2.2.x. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] uncovering groupmap problems
Stephane, Please file a bug report with clear details of how to reproduce the fault. Thanks. https://bugzilla.samba.org - John T. On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, [UTF-8] Stphane Purnelle wrote: John H Terpstra a crit : On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, [UTF-8] Stphane Purnelle wrote: Why you use net groupmap modify, if the first groupmapping of root group, I must use $ net groupmap add sid=S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-512 ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=root type=domain If it don't work, I think you can put a bug in bugzilla. Precisely what is the bug? Domain Users should have RID=513, not 512. RID=512 is Domain Admins If you want to change the RID you will have to delete the group and re-add it. Please help me to userstand: 1. How was the NT Group created? - If LDAP backend then you created it manually - If tdbsam backend, it is auto-created 2. How did it get to the setting you have now Using LDAP backend I just did the following: smbldap-groupadd.pl -g 560 -t domain -r 560 sammy net groupmap list Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-512) - Domain Admins Domain Users (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-513) - Domain Users Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-514) - Domain Guests Accounts (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-3001) - Accounts Finances (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-3003) - Finances PIOps (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-3005) - PIOps sammy (S-1-5-21-3504140859-1010554828-2431957765-560) - sammy Using tdbsam backend I just did: groupadd sammy net groupmap add ntgroup=Domain Sammy unixgroup=sammy type=d rid=560 net groumap list System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) - -1 Replicators (S-1-5-32-552) - -1 Guests (S-1-5-32-546) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-513) - users Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-512) - root Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-514) - nobody Domain Sammy (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-560) - sammy Power Users (S-1-5-32-547) - -1 Master (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-2001) - master Print Operators (S-1-5-32-550) - -1 Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) - -1 Account Operators (S-1-5-32-548) - -1 Backup Operators (S-1-5-32-551) - -1 Users (S-1-5-32-545) - -1 Think about this. If you have entries for a group that has the wrong RID, there are lots of mapping entries for this in: group_mapping.tdb (if not using LDAP) winbindd_cachine.tdb winbindd_idmap.tdb LDAP To intelligently change a RID, Samba will need to search for all occurances of the RID and change it. There is a large element of risk of loss o data consistency while that change is happening. The safest strategy is to delete a bad entry and then re-add it correctly. Now check this (with tdbsam): net groupmap delete ntgroup=Domain Users net groupmap list System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) - -1 Replicators (S-1-5-32-552) - -1 Guests (S-1-5-32-546) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-513) - -1 Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-512) - root Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-514) - nobody Power Users (S-1-5-32-547) - -1 Master (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-2001) - master Print Operators (S-1-5-32-550) - -1 Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1593769616-160655940-3590153233-1201) - users Account Operators (S-1-5-32-548) - -1 Backup Operators (S-1-5-32-551) - -1 Users (S-1-5-32-545) - -1 Notice that Domain Uses is automatically added by the tdbsam backend! That is why you can not remap the RID for the well-known groups. With an LDAP backend: net groupmap delete ntgroup=Domain Users net groupmap add ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=Domain Users rid=513 This works fine. The LDAP backend does NOT auto-add the well known groups. But you cannot change the RID once it is added. You can delete a group mapping and then re-add it. So precisely, what is the bug? I have seen the head-banging over the week-end and still do not understand what the problem is. - John T. Ok, but # net groupmap modify ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=root net: ../../../libraries/liblber/decode.c:500: ber_scanf: Assertion `((ber)-ber_opts.lbo_valid==0x2)' failed. Aborted [EMAIL PROTECTED] migration]# net groupmap modify sid=S-1-5-21-3186189368-1246494298-1334198317-512 ntgroup=Domain Users unixgroup=root type=domain net: ../../../libraries/liblber/decode.c:500: ber_scanf: Assertion `((ber)-ber_opts.lbo_valid==0x2)' failed. Calling net groupmap modify, with no existing mapping is a user/administrator error Butn these messages not help the user. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions:
[Samba] Win98 authenticaton problems with Samba PDC
I get your password is invalid or your logon share is inaccessible when I try to authenticate with a Win98 machine. Can you tell me if there is something special that I have to do? Thanks. # Global parameters [global] workgroup = DOMAIN server string = sbs max log size = 0 time server = Yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false -M %u logon script = login.bat logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U logon home = \\%L\%U\.profile domain logons = Yes os level = 65 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes dns proxy = No [netlogon] comment = The domain logon service path = /etc/samba browseable = No [profiles] path = /profiles read only = No create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [public] comment = Public path = /public read only = No [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %S read only = No create mask = 0664 directory mask = 0775 browseable = No -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbpasswd and chasing referral
For some reason i must use openldap slave server for samba PDC. Is it possible for user changing their smbpassword 'on the fly' from win client? --beast -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
CVS update: samba/source/passdb
Date: Mon Dec 22 11:12:13 2003 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2917/passdb Modified Files: util_sam_sid.c Log Message: Patch from Jianliang Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] to manage Power Users group. Jeremy. Revisions: util_sam_sid.c 1.8 = 1.9 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/util_sam_sid.c.diff?r1=1.8r2=1.9
CVS update: samba/source/passdb
Date: Mon Dec 22 11:12:15 2003 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2924/passdb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 util_sam_sid.c Log Message: Patch from Jianliang Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] to manage Power Users group. Jeremy. Revisions: util_sam_sid.c 1.2.2.7 = 1.2.2.8 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/util_sam_sid.c.diff?r1=1.2.2.7r2=1.2.2.8
CVS update: samba/source/include
Date: Mon Dec 22 21:24:40 2003 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/include In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv17159/include Modified Files: rpc_misc.h Log Message: add well known rid for pre win2k compatible access group; bug 897 Revisions: rpc_misc.h 1.40 = 1.41 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/include/rpc_misc.h.diff?r1=1.40r2=1.41
CVS update: samba/source/passdb
Date: Mon Dec 22 21:24:40 2003 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv17159/passdb Modified Files: util_sam_sid.c Log Message: add well known rid for pre win2k compatible access group; bug 897 Revisions: util_sam_sid.c 1.9 = 1.10 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/util_sam_sid.c.diff?r1=1.9r2=1.10
CVS update: samba/examples
Date: Mon Dec 22 21:26:30 2003 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/examples In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv17939 Modified Files: smb.conf.default Log Message: correct typo in delete user script; bug 887 Revisions: smb.conf.default1.18 = 1.19 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/examples/smb.conf.default.diff?r1=1.18r2=1.19
CVS update: samba/examples
Date: Mon Dec 22 21:32:33 2003 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/examples In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18865 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 smb.conf.default Log Message: correct typo in delete user script; bug 887 Revisions: smb.conf.default1.13.2.5 = 1.13.2.6 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/examples/smb.conf.default.diff?r1=1.13.2.5r2=1.13.2.6
CVS update: samba/source/include
Date: Mon Dec 22 21:48:06 2003 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/include In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv21440/include Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 rpc_misc.h Log Message: add well known rid for pre win2k compatible access group; bug 897 Revisions: rpc_misc.h 1.33.2.7 = 1.33.2.8 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/include/rpc_misc.h.diff?r1=1.33.2.7r2=1.33.2.8
CVS update: samba/source/passdb
Date: Mon Dec 22 21:48:06 2003 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv21440/passdb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 util_sam_sid.c Log Message: add well known rid for pre win2k compatible access group; bug 897 Revisions: util_sam_sid.c 1.2.2.8 = 1.2.2.9 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/util_sam_sid.c.diff?r1=1.2.2.8r2=1.2.2.9
