[Samba] What circumstances migth favour frequently locked files
Gentlemen, I am running a RH9 - Samba PDC ( 3.0.1pre3) in a mixed W9X/XP/NT production environment and encountered a problem related to locked files. By tracing down the event I suspect it might have happened when a certain user tried to copy a large number of files from an NT server on to the Samba server. The process resulted in a list of locked files that remained there until a smb restart. Below is my event log related to that. However I discovered other files staying locked as well , not in relation with big transfers . Can you please tell me what circumstances might favour such unwanted locking situations? And what are the odds for file corruption in such cases? And final question: What is the safest upgrade method from a preliminary version - rpm package - ( 3.0.1pre3, my case) to the latest stable one? Simply removing the rpms and installing the new ones by preserving the conf and smbpasswd file? Thank you, Cristian 2004/03/11 17:05:50, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36) === [2004/03/11 17:05:50, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 4046 (3.0.1pre3) Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection [2004/03/11 17:05:50, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) === [2004/03/11 17:05:50, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1400) PANIC: internal error [2004/03/11 17:05:50, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1408) BACKTRACE: 14 stack frames: #0 smbd(smb_panic+0x11c) [0x81bc81c] #1 smbd [0x81ab1f2] #2 /lib/tls/libc.so.6 [0x420275c8] #3 smbd(alloc_sub_basic+0x22) [0x81c2cb2] #4 smbd(strftime+0x19a1) [0x80776ed] #5 smbd(make_connection+0x4ca) [0x80cb4aa] #6 smbd(reply_tcon_and_X+0x1af) [0x809bd8f] #7 smbd [0x80c7c56] #8 smbd [0x80c7e29] #9 smbd(process_smb+0x8f) [0x80c803f] #10 smbd(smbd_process+0x167) [0x80c8c77] #11 smbd(main+0x4bf) [0x8227c0f] #12 /lib/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe4) [0x42015574] #13 smbd(chroot+0x35) [0x8076b91] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 2 - Samba 3 : Group mapping only partially working
Hi, I have just upgraded from samba 2.2.8 to samba 3.0.2. In my old 2.2.8 pdc configuration I used a domain admin group clause to map some users to administrators. When I would login with this user all would be well. Printing out the user details from a Win2K client would show: c:\ net user mark /domain The request will be processed at a domain controller for domain HOME.LAN. snip Local Group Memberships *BUILTIN\Users*Users Global Group memberships *Domain Users *Domain Admins However, post upgrade the same command now shows: Local Group Memberships *adm Global Group memberships *Domain Admins*Users There are a few curious things here (a) Local group membership is set to adm!! (The mark uid includes membership of the linux group adm). (b) The old Users local memberships do not exist. My samba group mapping is like this: System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-3891909844-1233218766-3156376020-513) - smbusers Replicators (S-1-5-32-552) - -1 Guests (S-1-5-32-546) - smbguest Power Users (S-1-5-32-547) - -1 Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-3891909844-1233218766-3156376020-512) - smbadmin Print Operators (S-1-5-32-550) - -1 Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) - smbadmin Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-3891909844-1233218766-3156376020-514) - smbguest Account Operators (S-1-5-32-548) - -1 Backup Operators (S-1-5-32-551) - -1 Users (S-1-5-32-545) - smbusers Can anyone give me some clues to restore the old local group memberships? Regards/Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Roaming profiles on a small network
Hi list, I intend to run an old pentium 133 as a linux-based fileserver on my home network (I have to use windows for my main machine and laptop!) Im having great diffiuculty synching the data, email, etc on my laptop and desktop, so I thought I might configure samba to act as a DC and use roaming profiles to make sure that my data is always synched. My question is this: is it worth the effort? Do you have any experience of doing so? Im not talking about a huge network here, literally just 2 machines. Obviously I couldnt log onto both machines at once, and Id have to be sure to log on and off with the laptop after a trip away from base so as to upload all relevant data to the server before logging onto to the desktop. Im not asking for actual technical help (im a linux/samba newbie, just in case that wasnt obvious ;-) ), but more your thoughts on whether this would be feasible/suitable TIA Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Slowly groupmembership
Hello, when i add a user to a group, the user will not see his new groupdirectorys. After rcsmb restart it goes, I've waiting up to 5 minutes before restarting Samba. groups user_name works fine. This is my smb.conf for the relatet share: [data] comment = Data path = /samba/daten read only = No inherit permissions = Yes hide unreadable = Yes veto files = /.*/ vfs objects = recycle recycle:keeptree = True recycle:versions = True recycle:repository = .recycle/%U How long does samba wait, to get the updated groups for a user from ldap? matze -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Roaming profiles on a small network
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Matt Janes wrote: Hi list, I intend to run an old pentium 133 as a linux-based fileserver on my home network (I have to use windows for my main machine and laptop!) Im having great diffiuculty synching the data, email, etc on my laptop and desktop, so I thought I might configure samba to act as a DC and use roaming profiles to make sure that my data is always synched. Last summer I did a setup like this for learning purposes on a P75 with 16MB RAM and it worked (not really fast of course, but it was ok.). It even worked with more then two machines and users. My question is this: is it worth the effort? Yes, if you want to learn something about Linux and networking, but this will need some time and a lot of trial and error. The simplier way would be to use a webmail account and to save your files on a USB stick, which can be plugged in and out everywhere. Regards, Uli. +-+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | - Wuppertal - | | Germany | +-+ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] citrix stores addition information into SAM on pdc
FYI (see below) maybe this is of interest for people planning to use samba in a WTS/Citrix environment. it`s about the question, that samba couldn`t store terminal-server-specific user settings (e.g. shadowing on/off) in its SAM (tdbsam or ldapsam). first tests show, that it seems to work with the latest CVS. i`m using tdbsam as the passdb backend. perhaps you wts/citrix/samba admin out there also want to test share your experience. regards roland ps: ntsec is just a commanline replacement for that click-click-M$-GUI-stuff ;) we had a short conversation regarding wts/citrix params on irc some days ago. i`d like to report, that my first tests look promising. i`m testing @home - no citrix around here, but ntsec commandline tools (btw: good product! eval. copy available!) let me manipulate some wts/citrix appropriate params, and they seem to be stored right (see below) fine ! :) C:\Programme\Pedestal Software\NTSECntuser -wts -s smb3server change root -wts_home_dir_drive c: C:\Programme\Pedestal Software\NTSECntuser -wts -s smb3server change root -wts_shadowing_settings 1 C:\Programme\Pedestal Software\NTSECntuser -wts -s smb3server change root -wts_home_dir \\test1\test C:\Programme\Pedestal Software\NTSECntuser -wts -s smb3server change root -wts_timeout_idle 123 C:\Programme\Pedestal Software\NTSECntuser -wts -s smb3server show root SERVER \\smb3server NAME root FULL_NAMEroot COMMENT USR_COMMENT COUNTRY_CODE 0 COUNTRY_PAGE 0 PRIV Guest HOME_DIR_DRIVE HOME_DIR c:\temp SCRIPT_PATH PROFILE \\smb3server\root\profile WORKSTATIONS NUM_LOGONS 0 LOGON_SERVER \\* LOGONNot defined LOGOFF Not defined LOGON_HOURS None allowed PASSWORD * PASSWORD_AGE 7202 sec PASSWORD_EXPIRED False BAD_PW_COUNT 0 ACCT_EXPIRES Never MAX_STORAGE Unlimited USER_ID 1000 PRIMARY_GROUP_ID 1001 WTS Initial Program WTS Working Directory WTS Inherit Initial Program True WTS Allow Logon True WTS Timeout Connections 0 WTS Timeout Disconnections 0 WTS Timeout Idle123 WTS Client Drives True WTS Client Printers True WTS Client Default Printer True WTS Broken Timeout 0 WTS Reconnect Settings 0 WTS Modem Callback Settings 0 WTS Modem Callback Phone WTS Shadowing Settings 1 WTS Profile Path WTS Home Dir\\test1\test WTS Home Dir Drive c:´ WTS Remote Home Dir True FLAGS AND POLICIES: (513) UF_SCRIPT : The logon script executed. This value must be set for LAN Manager 2.0 or Windows NT. UF_NORMAL_ACCOUNT : This is a default account type that represents a typical user. | is that mentioned patch (or whatever - see below) already available for the public for testing? | i assume the wts enhancement could probably add support for citrix, too. (because citrix probably stores | informations in the same way as wts does) because we have citrix and i like supporting open-source, | i would like to offer being an early adopter and perhaps could help with testing in a citrix environment | or supplying probably valuable information/bugreports. is there need for that? Jim McDonough has been working on that and would probably appreciate some extra testing. The quickest way is to grab the latest SAMBA_3_0 cvs code and give it a spin. The work is not quite finished currently IIRC. You could check with Jim for the latest status. You can find jim (jmcd) on the #samba-technical IRC channel (irc.freenode.net) or on the samba-technical ml. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] What circumstances migth favour frequently locked files
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Vladuta Cristian wrote: Gentlemen, I am running a RH9 - Samba PDC ( 3.0.1pre3) in a mixed W9X/XP/NT production environment and encountered a problem related to locked files. By tracing down the event I suspect it might have happened when a certain user tried to copy a large number of files from an NT server on to the Samba server. The process resulted in a list of locked files that remained there until a smb restart. Below is my event log related to that. However I discovered other files staying locked as well , not in relation with big transfers . Can you please tell me what circumstances might favour such unwanted locking situations? And what are the odds for file corruption in such cases? The log below shows the smbd has segfaulted (or crashed). That is particularly bad as it will leave entries in the lock tables and of course may have corrupted files that were being written to at the time of the crash. Segfaults can be caused by two factors: 1. Hardware problems 2. An executing application attempts an out-of-bounds operation By far the most common cause of segfaults is hardware related. Typical causes are: a. Bad memory b. Power instability c. Component overheating d. Defective components like network cards Since Samba-3 was released we have fixed at approx. 6 coding errors that could result in segfaults. Most were triggered by unusual conditions and are unlikely to affect code that drives main-stream operations. And final question: What is the safest upgrade method from a preliminary version - rpm package - ( 3.0.1pre3, my case) to the latest stable one? Simply removing the rpms and installing the new ones by preserving the conf and smbpasswd file? Download the Samba-3 RPMS from the Samba-Team FTP sites and run: rpm -Fvh *rpm This will preserve your configuration settings and will update all packages that are installed. - John T. 2004/03/11 17:05:50, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36) === [2004/03/11 17:05:50, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 4046 (3.0.1pre3) Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection [2004/03/11 17:05:50, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) === [2004/03/11 17:05:50, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1400) PANIC: internal error [2004/03/11 17:05:50, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1408) BACKTRACE: 14 stack frames: #0 smbd(smb_panic+0x11c) [0x81bc81c] #1 smbd [0x81ab1f2] #2 /lib/tls/libc.so.6 [0x420275c8] #3 smbd(alloc_sub_basic+0x22) [0x81c2cb2] #4 smbd(strftime+0x19a1) [0x80776ed] #5 smbd(make_connection+0x4ca) [0x80cb4aa] #6 smbd(reply_tcon_and_X+0x1af) [0x809bd8f] #7 smbd [0x80c7c56] #8 smbd [0x80c7e29] #9 smbd(process_smb+0x8f) [0x80c803f] #10 smbd(smbd_process+0x167) [0x80c8c77] #11 smbd(main+0x4bf) [0x8227c0f] #12 /lib/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe4) [0x42015574] #13 smbd(chroot+0x35) [0x8076b91] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 2.2.7a and SunOS 5.8
I have 2 Sun servers. One is running Samba 2.0.7 and I have no problems with response time or performance. The other server is running Samba 2.2.7a and on this server there are performance issues, slowness and long response times with long latencies over 400 msec. Both Sun server's are running SunOS 5.8. Is Samba 2.2.7a supported on this Unix box or is for a Linux server? Should I be experiencing any problems with this release. Thanks in advance for your support. Joe CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] WINBIND setup ?
It confused me, too. There is a Samba command net. You should use that instead of Smbpasswd command. _/) Tom Shilson ~GEDW VM System Services Aloha Tel: 651-733-7591 tshilson at mmm dot com Fax: 651-736-7689 Talwar, Puneet (NIH/NIAID) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] WINBIND setup ? s.samba.org 03/11/2004 03:19 PM HI, I am trying to setup WINBIND on my Red Hat Linux AS box and I have completed most of the steps but I am encountering come problem when I am joining the samba server to the PDC domain. Below is the syntax I am using: #Smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -r PDC -U Administrator See 'net join' for this functionality Thanks, -- Puneet Talwar Unix Administrator -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Alias for shares
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 07:42:19AM +0100, Stefan Günther wrote: Hi, Matthias Spork [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 12.03.04 21:36:49: Hello list, can i configure an alias-name for a share? volume= might be the parameter you are looking for. It's not really an alias, but perhaps it helps. Better still is 'copy ='. This makes an exact copy of a share defintion. You could certainly call it an alias ;-) Andrew Bartlett -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] I've fallen and I can't... re-join?
Hi, all. I've got a few PCs that, for various reasons, fell out as members of my domain. The problem here is that they didn't know it, and, using cached information, have been chugging along fine for their end users. This means that their locally cached profiles are w-a-y out of synch with the stuff on the server. So, my question: is there any way to re-add the PC to the domain w/o having the locally cached stuff get thrown out with the bath water? Thanks! Ken D'Ambrosio Sr. SysAdmin, Xanoptix, Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smb bdc ldap strict read only ?
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 03:33:27PM +0100, RRuegner wrote: Hi Sambatistas, if have setup a ldap pdc which works realy nice. Connected over vpn i wanna setup a bdc with an ldap slave as recommended in the docs. My question is should this ldap slave strict read only ?. I thought about passwords , as i enabled the ldap password sync. If the con is interrupted and there is only the slave what happens if a user wants to change his password? Should i strictly forbid such actions to the slave from the bdc, so that it is read only The slave will indeicate to Samba that Samba needs to talk to the master. If Samba cannot correctly talk to the master, the operation will fail. or is ther a way to configure ldap slave in setup to synchronize the written changes to his master after the connect to the master is up again. This is called 'multimaster replication'. Samba is not currently compatible with this, as it makes assumptions about a single consistant data store. Andrew Bartlett -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] samba 2.2.3a / openLDAP connection problem
If you have openldap compiled with tcp wrappers you should also have the appropriate entries in the file: /etc/hosts.allow Try to run a simple ldapsearch from the samba machine just to make sure you get some results: ldapsearch -x '(cn=Manager)' HTH, Diego On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Markus Amersdorfer wrote: On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:27:48 + Martin Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i've created a normal account for the user, but when i get to do : # smbpasswd -D10 -a marvsmb i get : ldap_open_connection: connection opened ldap_connect_system: Binding to ldap server as cn=manager,dc=ideaworks3d,dc=com Bind failed: Can't contact LDAP server ldap_open_connection: connection opened ldap_connect_system: Binding to ldap server as cn=manager,dc=ideaworks3d,dc=com Bind failed: Can't contact LDAP server Failed to add entry for user marvsmb. Failed to modify password entry for user marvsmb It seems your Samba-process can not (or is not allowed to -- what does slapd-output say?) connect to the slapd-server properly. Did you run smbpasswd -w $LDAP_BINDPW? Cheers, Max -- The first time any man's freedom is trodden on, we're all damaged. Cpt. Picard, The Drumhead, StarTrek TNG http://homex.subnet.at/~max/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Regestrierung
Herzlichen Glückwunsch ! Ihre Regestrierung auf www.ianta-ki.de war erfolgreich . Benützername = Sabine Passwort = 28142678 Sie können sich ab sofort mit den daten unter www.ianta-ki.de einlggen ! Ihr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smb bdc ldap strict read only ?
Andrew Bartlett schrieb: On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 03:33:27PM +0100, RRuegner wrote: Hi Sambatistas, if have setup a ldap pdc which works realy nice. Connected over vpn i wanna setup a bdc with an ldap slave as recommended in the docs. My question is should this ldap slave strict read only ?. I thought about passwords , as i enabled the ldap password sync. If the con is interrupted and there is only the slave what happens if a user wants to change his password? Should i strictly forbid such actions to the slave from the bdc, so that it is read only The slave will indeicate to Samba that Samba needs to talk to the master. If Samba cannot correctly talk to the master, the operation will fail. or is ther a way to configure ldap slave in setup to synchronize the written changes to his master after the connect to the master is up again. This is called 'multimaster replication'. Samba is not currently compatible with this, as it makes assumptions about a single consistant data store. Andrew Bartlett Hi Andrew , thx for your answer so funktion for bdc will be only read only for the ldap slave (fallback) and no changing to ldap entries could be made until the ldap master is back online again. am i right ? Regards -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] trust secret location in WinXP
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 12:17:01AM +0100, Csillag Tamas wrote: Hi, At our campus we have ~40 machines. If a new program is needed we install it on a single machine and replicate this one to the others. The whole process is automated: (Wake-On-LAN) (with pxe) booting a kernel via grub. booting a minimal ram based linux and doing: netcat server port /dev/hda If we send a WOL packet the restore process starts. The problem is that we have to rejoin each machine after. So my question is: where WinXP stores this information? Now I know the way howto mount NTFS RW (with captive: http://www.jankratochvil.net/project/captive/ ) And howto manipulate the registry: http://home.eunet.no/~pnordahl/ntpasswd/bootdisk.html The only question: where windows stores this information? In the registry or in a file? I want to backup that information at the start of the backup and write back after the restore completes. Any help would be appreciated. If you are ghosting your machines like that, you have bigger problems. Like what each machines' name is, what it's sid is and the like. however, if it is a Samba DC, you can just restore the 'old' password to the DC at the same time. Andrew Bartlett -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] (no subject)
Hi there, I need some help on samba where I can copy files from windows and drop in the share directory of unix, but I can't copy the unix share folders content out to windows Best Regards, Janson Luke Ong Wai Kit Infineon Technologies IFMY IT IFR SYS - Middleware *Disclaimer* This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may contain trade secrets or privileged or undisclosed information. They may also be subject to copyright protection. Please do not copy, distribute or forward this email to anyone unless authorised. If you are not a named addressee, you must not use, disclose, retain or reproduce all or any part of the information contained in this e-mail or any attachments. If you have received this email by mistake please notify the sender immediately by return email and destroy/delete all copies of the email. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Newbie question: Windows - Delayed write failed
I ran into this problem all of a sudden out of nowhere..I boted several times and it appeared to fix itself...windows XPbut it did notso I again hit the F8 when rebootingand instead of trying to boot into the safe mode I rebooted into the DEBUGGING MODEI don't know what happened.but I did not loose any data and it booted up as if nothing happenedI then went to system restore under system tools and restored to the day earlier...just in case something happened today to my machine to make it do this.hope this helps. tk [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Newbie question: Windows - Delayed write failed
My goodness. I'll just say what everyone else is thinking... What on earth are you on about? You've told us absoultely nothing about: A) your network setup (assuming you are actually posting about samba) B) clear points about what was working and is now not. Delayed write failed means that it couldn't write to a drive, and I'm fairly sure that writing to network drives from XP doesn't use delayed write, that's only on hard drives etc sigh system restore to try to fix a connection to samba? Now I've heard it all. -Original Message- From: Tom King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 12:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Newbie question: Windows - Delayed write failed I ran into this problem all of a sudden out of nowhere..I boted several times and it appeared to fix itself...windows XPbut it did notso I again hit the F8 when rebootingand instead of trying to boot into the safe mode I rebooted into the DEBUGGING MODEI don't know what happened.but I did not loose any data and it booted up as if nothing happenedI then went to system restore under system tools and restored to the day earlier...just in case something happened today to my machine to make it do this.hope this helps. tk [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] kerberos ticket expired
Hi list, I have tried kinit -r 7d -l 7d admin to keep the ticket last longer, but it ignored my flags and use default 1 day ticket life time. It is true that it shouldn't related to samba but kerberos, but can anyone simple tell me does the ticket is required after added net ads join into win2000 domain? thanks for the kindly help. steven -Original Message- From: steven.TSE Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 6:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] kerberos ticket expired Hi, Does the kerberos ticket useful after added the computer account into win2000 domain? Since I find that even the kerberos ticket expired, Samba still work. Does that mean I can simple destroy the ticket right after Samba init? Samba3.0.2a on Redhat8.0 Thankyou. Best Rgds., Steven -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] kerberos ticket expired
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 11:55:36AM +0800, steven.TSE wrote: Hi list, I have tried kinit -r 7d -l 7d admin to keep the ticket last longer, but it ignored my flags and use default 1 day ticket life time. It is true that it shouldn't related to samba but kerberos, but can anyone simple tell me does the ticket is required after added net ads join into win2000 domain? thanks for the kindly help. The ticket can be ignored after the join. Andrew Bartlett -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] user can't shut down windows clients?
dear sir, i have create a few users of the nobody group on my samba server. in my samba config, i listed root account as the domain admin group. when i logon to samba server, my root account can shutdown my windows client, can disconnect to domain ect etc... but when i logon as a user of the nobody group. i can't shutdown the windows client! the shutdown fucntion is not there anymore! i don't want to list restricted my users as domain admin group. is there any way to get around is problem? thank Q! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
AW: [Samba] Alias for shares
Hello Andrew, Matthias Spork [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 12.03.04 21:36:49: Hello list, can i configure an alias-name for a share? volume= might be the parameter you are looking for. It's not really an alias, but perhaps it helps. Better still is 'copy ='. This makes an exact copy of a share defintion. You could certainly call it an alias ;-) It still works: [data] comment = Data path = /bla/foo writeable = yes [data_alias] copy = daten matze -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] slow icon apperance in samba
Hello, I have some XP systems (all proffessional version with all updates applied) using samba 2.2.8. Previously I asked for the directory listing. Now, I have faster directory listing this is for sure, but I have delays in displaying the icons of the files. It is slow. I do not have this slow icon displaying issue at all computers here. I could not seem to be able to find the solution. Maybe it is XP... Anyone has same/similiar issue? Any ideas about the problem? Regards, -- Ertan Kkolu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ozler Plastik San. ve Tic. A.S. Tel: +90.212.676.6767 Fax: +90.212.676.8012 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
CVS update: samba/source/groupdb
Date: Sun Mar 14 10:24:18 2004 Author: vlendec Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/groupdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8225/groupdb Modified Files: mapping.c Log Message: Add and delete aliases via srv_samr_nt. For that I added a RID allocation call to winbindd. idmap_allocate_rid wants information about whether this will be a user or a group, I did not export this to the winbind interface. The reason for idmap to get that info is to keep consistent with the algorithmic convention to alloc only even rids for users and odd rids for groups. I'm not fully convinced that this really gains us anything. Any real good arguments? Volker Revisions: mapping.c 1.65 = 1.66 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/groupdb/mapping.c.diff?r1=1.65r2=1.66
CVS update: samba/source/nsswitch
Date: Sun Mar 14 10:24:19 2004 Author: vlendec Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nsswitch In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8225/nsswitch Modified Files: wb_client.c wbinfo.c winbindd.c winbindd_nss.h winbindd_sid.c Log Message: Add and delete aliases via srv_samr_nt. For that I added a RID allocation call to winbindd. idmap_allocate_rid wants information about whether this will be a user or a group, I did not export this to the winbind interface. The reason for idmap to get that info is to keep consistent with the algorithmic convention to alloc only even rids for users and odd rids for groups. I'm not fully convinced that this really gains us anything. Any real good arguments? Volker Revisions: wb_client.c 1.45 = 1.46 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nsswitch/wb_client.c.diff?r1=1.45r2=1.46 wbinfo.c1.73 = 1.74 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nsswitch/wbinfo.c.diff?r1=1.73r2=1.74 winbindd.c 1.113 = 1.114 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd.c.diff?r1=1.113r2=1.114 winbindd_nss.h 1.35 = 1.36 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd_nss.h.diff?r1=1.35r2=1.36 winbindd_sid.c 1.25 = 1.26 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd_sid.c.diff?r1=1.25r2=1.26
CVS update: samba/source/rpc_server
Date: Sun Mar 14 10:24:19 2004 Author: vlendec Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/rpc_server In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8225/rpc_server Modified Files: srv_samr_nt.c Log Message: Add and delete aliases via srv_samr_nt. For that I added a RID allocation call to winbindd. idmap_allocate_rid wants information about whether this will be a user or a group, I did not export this to the winbind interface. The reason for idmap to get that info is to keep consistent with the algorithmic convention to alloc only even rids for users and odd rids for groups. I'm not fully convinced that this really gains us anything. Any real good arguments? Volker Revisions: srv_samr_nt.c 1.181 = 1.182 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c.diff?r1=1.181r2=1.182
CVS update: samba/source/nsswitch
Date: Sun Mar 14 10:28:21 2004 Author: vlendec Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nsswitch In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9193 Modified Files: winbindd_group.c Log Message: Fix 'getent group aliasname', this did not look in pdb. Revisions: winbindd_group.c1.76 = 1.77 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd_group.c.diff?r1=1.76r2=1.77
CVS update: samba/source/groupdb
Date: Sun Mar 14 10:36:07 2004 Author: vlendec Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/groupdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10697/groupdb Modified Files: mapping.c Log Message: Clean up a bit :-) Volker Revisions: mapping.c 1.66 = 1.67 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/groupdb/mapping.c.diff?r1=1.66r2=1.67
CVS update: samba/source/passdb
Date: Sun Mar 14 10:36:07 2004 Author: vlendec Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10697/passdb Modified Files: util_sam_sid.c Log Message: Clean up a bit :-) Volker Revisions: util_sam_sid.c 1.12 = 1.13 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/util_sam_sid.c.diff?r1=1.12r2=1.13
CVS update: samba/source/nsswitch
Date: Sun Mar 14 11:15:38 2004 Author: vlendec Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nsswitch In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv16993/nsswitch Modified Files: winbindd_group.c Log Message: Ok, one of the latest cleanups did too much... :-) Re-add adding the local aliases to winbindd_getgroups. Volker Revisions: winbindd_group.c1.77 = 1.78 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd_group.c.diff?r1=1.77r2=1.78
Using the '.' in names.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Fri Mar 12 21:35:15 2004 Author: herb Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libsmb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24318/libsmb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 nmblib.c Log Message: if we are truncating to the . we need to start at the beginning in case there are multiple .'s in the name. This code is protected with an #ifdef TRUNCATE_NETBIOS_NAME and this is #define'd to 1 directly above. Should we also get rid of the #ifdef? Revisions: nmblib.c1.68.2.12 = 1.68.2.13 Sure is an interesting bit of code and commentary. The way the code reads, it truncates at the 'last' dot, not the first. That may be the correct way to handle the problem. As always, I think you'ld need to see what Windows does. Urg. What's worse is that it may require seeing what happens with several flavors of Windows. Chris -)- -- Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
