[Samba] Re: Newbie/Unable to join my new Domain

2004-03-30 Thread Björn Friebel
hello

did u add the machineaccount ? 
did u add an user? 
did u add an adminaccount? 
the machine must be made known with the admin account and it should have uid guid 0 on 
linux as I am right.
u should make shares 
[netlogon]
[profiles]


Björn 




--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Re: Purpose of param. time server ?

2004-03-30 Thread Malcolm Baldridge
 a) Ability to set clock by net time ... don't depend on value of this
 parameter on SAMBA server.

I don't know if Samba supports the call if you don't specify that.

 b) Ability to set clock by net time on NT and subsequent Windows is based
 on system rights of current user,  and so it is not sure to work.

Correct.  Consumer Windows [95/98/Me] let you do it unconditionally.

 c) Setting clock during execution of login script is dependent on user
 logging and then accurancy of clock depends on frequency of logging in.

Correct.  And it's not very precise either.  I think +/- 0.5 second is the
best you can expect, and it's probably not even that good.  It's not NTP,
nor does it condition the system's clocks.  You're better off using W32Time
for NTP, which comes built-in with Windows 2000, and is an easily obtained
download for Windows NT.
 
 Is somebody able to explain me it more thoroughly ?

You'd sprinkle net time \\sambaserver /set into the login scripts of your
various users.  This is easier to do for Windows 95/98/Me of course.

=R=


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] passwd.tdb domainname

2004-03-30 Thread Collen Blijenberg MLHJ
hmmm.. got a small problem...

i installed samba 3 on 2nd network..
works fine.. but the domain name changed..
(used the workgroup = option in smb.conf)
rejointed the the wks.. works all fine.

but now when i do pdbedit -v usrname

it shows the old domain in it's listing.. ?
(the users can user there logon name and all, except for a few minor
things..!)

so my question is, how can i change there domain, in the passwd.tdb
database. ??
didn't see anny options in pdbedit..?!??
-
Collen Blijenberg (Systeem/Netwerk Beheerder)

Montessori Lyceum 
Herman Jordan
Zeist

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Re: Re: Purpose of param. time server ?

2004-03-30 Thread M. Vancl

Malcolm Baldridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
 a) Ability to set clock by net time ... don't depend on value of this
 parameter on SAMBA server.

I don't know if Samba supports the call if you don't specify that.

But I do. It's wery simple test to verify it.

 b) Ability to set clock by net time on NT and subsequent Windows is based
 on system rights of current user,  and so it is not sure to work.

Correct.  Consumer Windows [95/98/Me] let you do it unconditionally.

OK. Win9x/ME have no security politics. My problem are NT, 2k, XP - user
account must be at least in Power Users group to be able to do it.

 c) Setting clock during execution of login script is dependent on user
 logging and then accurancy of clock depends on frequency of logging in.

Correct.  And it's not very precise either.  I think +/- 0.5 second is the
best you can expect, and it's probably not even that good.  It's not NTP,
nor does it condition the system's clocks.  You're better off using W32Time
for NTP, which comes built-in with Windows 2000, and is an easily obtained
download for Windows NT.

Yes, ntp is the solution, but my original question was what is purpose of
that fucking option ?!

M.V.



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Notification

2004-03-30 Thread Spamserver
* eManager Notification **

Recipient, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail.

Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED]

*** End of message ***
Received: from 208.8.92.60 by jupiter.INSIDEAI.COM (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); 
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 03:58:59 -0500
Received: from lists.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]) by viruswall.ai-logix.com
  (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35)
  with ESMTP id com for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
  Tue, 30 Mar 2004 03:59:56 -0500
Received: from dp.samba.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417C32C247
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:56:29 + (GMT)
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C5B2C050
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:55:23 + (GMT)
Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1B8F1b-00054p-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:55:11 +0200
Received: from violet.setuza.cz ([194.149.118.97])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:55:11 +0200
Received: from mvancl by violet.setuza.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:55:11 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: M. Vancl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:55:18 +0200
Lines: 32
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: violet.setuza.cz
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on dp.samba.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=3.2 tests=BAYES_00,PRIORITY_NO_NAME 
autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Level: 
Subject: [Samba] Re: Re: Purpose of param. time server ?
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3
Precedence: list
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba samba.lists.samba.org
List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba
List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Notification

2004-03-30 Thread Spamserver
* eManager Notification **

Recipient, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail.

Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED]

*** End of message ***
Received: from 208.8.92.60 by jupiter.INSIDEAI.COM (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); 
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 03:59:22 -0500
Received: from lists.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]) by viruswall.ai-logix.com
  (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35)
  with ESMTP id com for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
  Tue, 30 Mar 2004 04:00:19 -0500
Received: from dp.samba.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B112C4B8
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:56:52 + (GMT)
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C5B2C050
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:55:23 + (GMT)
Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1B8F1b-00054p-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:55:11 +0200
Received: from violet.setuza.cz ([194.149.118.97])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:55:11 +0200
Received: from mvancl by violet.setuza.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:55:11 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: M. Vancl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:55:18 +0200
Lines: 32
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: violet.setuza.cz
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on dp.samba.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=3.2 tests=BAYES_00,PRIORITY_NO_NAME 
autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Level: 
Subject: [Samba] Re: Re: Purpose of param. time server ?
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3
Precedence: list
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba samba.lists.samba.org
List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba
List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Re: Re: Purpose of param. time server ?

2004-03-30 Thread Malcolm Baldridge

 Yes, ntp is the solution, but my original question was what is purpose
 of that fucking option ?!

I would say, have you tried reading the fucking documentation? :)

 from smb.conf 

time server (G)

This parameter determines if nmbd(8) advertises itself as a time server
to Windows clients.

Default: time server = no



There.  It looks like an *NMBD* option more than an *SMBD* option.

=R=



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Notification

2004-03-30 Thread Spamserver
* eManager Notification **

Recipient, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail.

Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED]

*** End of message ***
Received: from 208.8.92.60 by jupiter.INSIDEAI.COM (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); 
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 04:11:05 -0500
Received: from lists.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]) by viruswall.ai-logix.com
  (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35)
  with ESMTP id com for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
  Tue, 30 Mar 2004 04:12:01 -0500
Received: from dp.samba.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC372C4AA
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:08:34 + (GMT)
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mithrandir.paypc.com (mithrandir.paypc.com [66.186.24.2])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A582C0A4
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:08:14 + (GMT)
Received: from mithrandir.paypc.com (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by mithrandir.paypc.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i2U986Cx012126
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:08:06 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by mithrandir.paypc.com (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i2U986ka012125
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:08:06 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: mithrandir.paypc.com: www set sender to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
Received: from adsl-64-175-120-30.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net
(adsl-64-175-120-30.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.175.120.30]) 
by www.paypc.com (IMP) with HTTP 
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:08:06 -0800
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:08:06 -0800
From: Malcolm Baldridge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: Re: Purpose of param. time server ?
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1
X-Originating-IP: 64.175.120.30
X-Via: 
X-Cache: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on dp.samba.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=3.2 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS 
autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Level: 
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3
Precedence: list
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba samba.lists.samba.org
List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba
List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Notification

2004-03-30 Thread Spamserver
* eManager Notification **

Recipient, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail.

Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED]

*** End of message ***
Received: from 208.8.92.60 by jupiter.INSIDEAI.COM (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); 
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 04:11:29 -0500
Received: from lists.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]) by viruswall.ai-logix.com
  (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35)
  with ESMTP id com for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
  Tue, 30 Mar 2004 04:12:26 -0500
Received: from dp.samba.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C962C67D
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:08:59 + (GMT)
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mithrandir.paypc.com (mithrandir.paypc.com [66.186.24.2])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A582C0A4
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:08:14 + (GMT)
Received: from mithrandir.paypc.com (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by mithrandir.paypc.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i2U986Cx012126
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:08:06 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by mithrandir.paypc.com (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i2U986ka012125
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:08:06 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: mithrandir.paypc.com: www set sender to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
Received: from adsl-64-175-120-30.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net
(adsl-64-175-120-30.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.175.120.30]) 
by www.paypc.com (IMP) with HTTP 
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:08:06 -0800
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:08:06 -0800
From: Malcolm Baldridge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: Re: Purpose of param. time server ?
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1
X-Originating-IP: 64.175.120.30
X-Via: 
X-Cache: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on dp.samba.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=3.2 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS 
autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Level: 
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3
Precedence: list
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba samba.lists.samba.org
List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba
List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: [Samba] Windows client using UPPERCASEto connect to Samba3.02aserve

2004-03-30 Thread Miki Barzilay
Hi again and thanks
I'm using WinNT 4.0 as my network PDC. The Samba server is only a member
server.
Any idea how to solve this issue?

Thanks,
Miki

 -Original Message-
 From: Nigel Marsh [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Mon, March 29, 2004 11:59 AM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: [Samba] Windows client using UPPERCASEto connect to
 Samba3.02aserve
 
 For a PDC, the first thing I would recommend is, security=user not, 
 security=domain. 
 
 The =domain setting tries to pass authentication to another PDC/BDC. If
 you 
 are looking to set up a PDC you need the, =user setting. 
 
 
 On Monday 29 March 2004 10:19, rrr wrote:
  Anyone??? Any help? Any idea?
 
  Please.
  Miki
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wed, March 24, 2004 5:02 PM
   To:   rrr
   Cc:   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
   Subject:  Re: [Samba] Windows client using UPPERCASEto connect to
   Samba 3.02aserve
  
   -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
   Hash: SHA1
  
   rrr wrote:
I installed Samba 3.02a server on Fedora Core 1 server . I have NT
 :(
as PDC so Samba check Username/Password on this server and I add a
 line
in smb.conf to add new users to the Unix. All usernames on the NT
domain ar lowercase and I'm using security=domain While I can map
 drive
from NT/2000/XP workstation I'm not able to connect or map from
 Windows
98 clients. When I'm typing NET USE S: \\samba\testuser on the
 command
prompt I'm getting this msg on the Windows client:
   
C:\WINDOWS\Desktopnet use s: \\samba\testuser
The password is invalid for \\SAMBA\TESTUSER.
For more information, contact your network
administrator. Type the password for \\PUMA\TESTUSER:
   
I run smbd -i -d 2 to see what happen on the Linux machine at the
   
 same time in this is the resault:
  
   run smbd -d 10 -i and look again.  There's a lot of missing
   information.
  
  
  
  
  
  
   cheers, jerry
   -
 --
   Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
   SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
   GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
   If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song --Switchfoot (2003)
  
   -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
   Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
   Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/
  
   iD8DBQFAYaLnIR7qMdg1EfYRAp2YAKC7BbDQF7BV0LAYPAjnFxWKXlMwkgCePocO
   DFDLicxgX8SETZlE45l/CS0=
   =2bB8
   -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 -- 
 [The members of the Chamberlain government] are decided only to be
 undecided,
 resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, all-powerful for impotency.
   -- Winston Churchill
 -- 
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Re: Cluster Samba print servers

2004-03-30 Thread Zylo
According to the samba howto collection, dynamic load balancing seems to be
a bad solution : one printer should have only one queue.
If you want to have failover : usually a shared disk is used. The disk is
mounted by the active machine. On this disk, you may have all your
executables and config files, and spool space. You may start the daemons
with a script (problem with swat).
The names of the queues should be the same on the 2 machines. (the same, the
better : hard / soft / users) Of course one instance of samba should be
working at a time.
It's better if you are able to take the IP of the failed machine. If you
have no shared disk, may be regular copy of all the files is sufficient.
Your problem is not only a printer problem, it's a general samba failover
problem.
My 2cts.

HTH.


Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit dans le message de
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 I should add that we have no intention of using these servers for file
sharing
 (except for the hidden print$ share). These are strictly print servers.

 I noticed Red Hat Cluster Manager states it doesn't support failover of
printer
 shareshow come?

 -- 
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba




-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE : [Samba] Purpose of param. time server ?

2004-03-30 Thread Raphaël RIGNIER
By default, Windoze XP Pro Workstations look for the (S)NTP service on the
PDC to synchronize with.
If your Samba server is a PDC, then yes, you could use this option and
configure NTP service on the Samba Box. There is nothing to do with your XP
pro workstations, if tey are members of the domain.

If your workstations are XP Home or in Workgroup mode, it is NOT automatic.
You must configure the w32time service to syncrhonize to the IP address of
your local NTP server (by default it's time.microsoft.com or something like
that).

To see exactly what your Windows workstation is doing with time, you can use
w32time service in debug mode
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;816043

Raphaël

- -Message d'origine-
- De : 
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- org] De la part de Malcolm Baldridge
- Envoyé : mardi 30 mars 2004 11:08
- À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Objet : Re: [Samba] Re: Re: Purpose of param. time server ?
- 
- 
- 
-  Yes, ntp is the solution, but my original question was 
- what is purpose 
-  of that fucking option ?!
- 
- I would say, have you tried reading the fucking documentation? :)
- 
-  from smb.conf 
- 
- time server (G)
- 
- This parameter determines if nmbd(8) advertises itself 
- as a time server to Windows clients.
- 
- Default: time server = no
- 
- 
- 
- There.  It looks like an *NMBD* option more than an *SMBD* option.
- 
- =R=
- 
- 
- 
- -- 
- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
- instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
- 

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Notification

2004-03-30 Thread Spamserver
* eManager Notification **

Recipient, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail.

Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED]

*** End of message ***
Received: from 208.8.92.60 by jupiter.INSIDEAI.COM (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); 
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 04:43:56 -0500
Received: from lists.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]) by viruswall.ai-logix.com
  (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35)
  with ESMTP id com for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
  Tue, 30 Mar 2004 04:44:53 -0500
Received: from dp.samba.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF582C633
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:41:26 + (GMT)
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mwinf0403.wanadoo.fr (smtp4.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.27])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252DD2C09D
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:40:50 + (GMT)
Received: from mail.cpe-chartreux.com
(ALyon-209-2-3-158.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.9.158])
by mwinf0403.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1CF4B500035B
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:40:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mail.cpe-chartreux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE0A1B6E7
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:40:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.cpe-chartreux.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bouba.prepa-cpe.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 05776-01 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:40:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from VELOCE (veloce.prepa-cpe.fr [192.168.2.3])
by mail.cpe-chartreux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F251B699
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:40:36 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rapha=EBl_RIGNIER?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE : [Samba]  Purpose of param. time server ?
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:40:35 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cpe-chartreux.com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on dp.samba.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=3.2 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS 
autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Level: 
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3
Precedence: list
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba samba.lists.samba.org
List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba
List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Notification

2004-03-30 Thread Spamserver
* eManager Notification **

Recipient, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail.

Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED]

*** End of message ***
Received: from 208.8.92.60 by jupiter.INSIDEAI.COM (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); 
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 04:44:32 -0500
Received: from lists.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]) by viruswall.ai-logix.com
  (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35)
  with ESMTP id com for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
  Tue, 30 Mar 2004 04:45:29 -0500
Received: from dp.samba.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D492C0B9
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:42:02 + (GMT)
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mwinf0403.wanadoo.fr (smtp4.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.27])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252DD2C09D
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:40:50 + (GMT)
Received: from mail.cpe-chartreux.com
(ALyon-209-2-3-158.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.9.158])
by mwinf0403.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1CF4B500035B
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:40:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mail.cpe-chartreux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE0A1B6E7
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:40:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.cpe-chartreux.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bouba.prepa-cpe.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 05776-01 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:40:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from VELOCE (veloce.prepa-cpe.fr [192.168.2.3])
by mail.cpe-chartreux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F251B699
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:40:36 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rapha=EBl_RIGNIER?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE : [Samba]  Purpose of param. time server ?
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:40:35 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cpe-chartreux.com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on dp.samba.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=3.2 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS 
autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Level: 
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3
Precedence: list
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba samba.lists.samba.org
List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba
List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: [Samba] Windows client using UPPERCASEto connect to Samba3.02aserve

2004-03-30 Thread rrr
 Hi again and thanks
 I'm using WinNT 4.0 as my network PDC. The Samba server is only a member
 server.
 Any idea how to solve this issue?
 
 Thanks,
 Miki
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   -Original Message-
   From:   Nigel Marsh [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent:   Mon, March 29, 2004 11:59 AM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject:Re: [Samba] Windows client using UPPERCASEto connect
 to Samba3.02aserve
 
   For a PDC, the first thing I would recommend is, security=user
 not, 
   security=domain. 
 
   The =domain setting tries to pass authentication to another
 PDC/BDC. If you 
   are looking to set up a PDC you need the, =user setting. 
 
 
   On Monday 29 March 2004 10:19, rrr wrote:
Anyone??? Any help? Any idea?
   
Please.
Miki
   
 -Original Message-
 From:   Gerald (Jerry) Carter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent:   Wed, March 24, 2004 5:02 PM
 To: rrr
 Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Subject:Re: [Samba] Windows client using UPPERCASEto connect
 to
 Samba 3.02aserve

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 rrr wrote:
  I installed Samba 3.02a server on Fedora Core 1 server . I
 have NT :(
  as PDC so Samba check Username/Password on this server and I
 add a line
  in smb.conf to add new users to the Unix. All usernames on the
 NT
  domain ar lowercase and I'm using security=domain While I can
 map drive
  from NT/2000/XP workstation I'm not able to connect or map
 from Windows
  98 clients. When I'm typing NET USE S: \\samba\testuser on the
 command
  prompt I'm getting this msg on the Windows client:
 
  C:\WINDOWS\Desktopnet use s: \\samba\testuser
  The password is invalid for \\SAMBA\TESTUSER.
  For more information, contact your network
  administrator. Type the password for \\PUMA\TESTUSER:
 
  I run smbd -i -d 2 to see what happen on the Linux machine at
 the
 
   same time in this is the resault:

 run smbd -d 10 -i and look again.  There's a lot of missing
 information.






 cheers, jerry
 -
 --
 Hewlett-Packard-
 http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team --
 http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key  
 http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song --Switchfoot
 (2003)

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

 iD8DBQFAYaLnIR7qMdg1EfYRAp2YAKC7BbDQF7BV0LAYPAjnFxWKXlMwkgCePocO
 DFDLicxgX8SETZlE45l/CS0=
 =2bB8
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
   -- 
   [The members of the Chamberlain government] are decided only to be
 undecided,
   resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, all-powerful for
 impotency.
   -- Winston Churchill
   -- 
   To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
   instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Problems with charsets and i18n

2004-03-30 Thread Ralf Tomczak
Hello list,

probably a known issue (but I haven't found a link yet):

I'm using 3.0.2a with 'unix charset = ISO8859-15' and get the following then a file 
with ticks is created:
- desired: `'
- displayed: `'
  ^^^
The euro sign is created correctly in a file name. The filename will be displayed in 
the filesystem correctly.

Then I switch to LATIN1 the ticks are OK (correctly displayed from windows client and 
in the Unix filessystem as well).

I'm using Suse SLES8 but I've seen the issue with debian as well with locales set to 
de_DE.ISO8859-15 (or [EMAIL PROTECTED] on SLES8).

Surplus: The locales seem to be OK and it's possible to create files with ticks and 
euro sign on the console. 

Any Ideas?
Ralf Tomczak


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Problems with charsets and i18n

2004-03-30 Thread Radio Gong 2000 GmbH Co. KG [Technik]
Use:

dos charset = ISO8859-15
unix charset = ISO8859-15
display charset = ISO8859-15

It works fine for me...



Am Dienstag, 30. Mrz 2004 12:53 schrieb Ralf Tomczak:
 Hello list,

 probably a known issue (but I haven't found a link yet):

 I'm using 3.0.2a with 'unix charset = ISO8859-15' and get the following
 then a file with ticks is created: - desired: `'
 - displayed: `'
   ^^^
 The euro sign is created correctly in a file name. The filename will be
 displayed in the filesystem correctly.

 Then I switch to LATIN1 the ticks are OK (correctly displayed from windows
 client and in the Unix filessystem as well).

 I'm using Suse SLES8 but I've seen the issue with debian as well with
 locales set to de_DE.ISO8859-15 (or [EMAIL PROTECTED] on SLES8).

 Surplus: The locales seem to be OK and it's possible to create files with
 ticks and euro sign on the console.

 Any Ideas?
 Ralf Tomczak

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grssen

Sascha Bieler
___
Radio Gong 2000 GmbH  Co. KG
Sascha Bieler
Technischer Leiter
Franz-Joseph-Strasse 14
80801 Mnchen

Tel.: +49 89 38 166 181
Fax.: +49 89 38 166 180
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Problems with charsets and i18n

2004-03-30 Thread Ralf Tomczak
I tried this, but AFAIK only unix charset is responsible for filessystem to smb 
mappings. Unfortunally the error still exists (did you tried explicitly to create 
filenames with three types of ticks?).

Anyway, thank you.
Ralf

-- 
Name: Ralf Tomczak
Firma:scitech it solutions GmbH
Adresse:  Neuendorfstrae 18 a
  16761  Hennigsdorf
  Deutschland

Geschftlich: +49 (03302) 559505
Mobiltelefon: +49 (0173) 6040312
Fax geschftl.:   +49 (03302) 559320
E-Mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Webseite: http://www.scitech-gmbh.de 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of Radio Gong 2000 GmbH  Co. KG [Technik]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 1:40 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Samba] Problems with charsets and i18n
 
 
 Use:
 
 dos charset = ISO8859-15
 unix charset = ISO8859-15
 display charset = ISO8859-15
 
 It works fine for me...
 
 
 
 Am Dienstag, 30. Mrz 2004 12:53 schrieb Ralf Tomczak:
  Hello list,
 
  probably a known issue (but I haven't found a link yet):
 
  I'm using 3.0.2a with 'unix charset = ISO8859-15' and get the 
  following then a file with ticks is created: - desired: 
 `'
  - displayed: `'
^^^
  The euro sign is created correctly in a file name. The 
 filename will 
  be displayed in the filesystem correctly.
 
  Then I switch to LATIN1 the ticks are OK (correctly displayed from 
  windows client and in the Unix filessystem as well).
 
  I'm using Suse SLES8 but I've seen the issue with debian as 
 well with 
  locales set to de_DE.ISO8859-15 (or [EMAIL PROTECTED] on SLES8).
 
  Surplus: The locales seem to be OK and it's possible to 
 create files 
  with ticks and euro sign on the console.
 
  Any Ideas?
  Ralf Tomczak
 
 -- 
 Mit freundlichen Grssen
 
 Sascha Bieler
 ___
 Radio Gong 2000 GmbH  Co. KG
 Sascha Bieler
 Technischer Leiter
 Franz-Joseph-Strasse 14
 80801 Mnchen
 
 Tel.: +49 89 38 166 181
 Fax.: +49 89 38 166 180
 -- 
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Problems when executing a DOS batch file on a Samba Server

2004-03-30 Thread COMSA Radu
I have the following problem when I execute a DOS batch file
on a Samba 3.0.0 Server on a Linux Fedora operating system:

The Samba Server shares a directory with the following attributes:

[disk_g]
path = /disk_g
writeable = yes
valid users = winuser
create mask = 0777

The workstation (a Windows 98 computer) has mapped disk_g with the 
G: drive letter.

The batch file is a complex compile command. It contains between his 
lines this command:
...
IF EXIST .\OBJ\*.VAR FOR %%x IN (.\OBJ\*.VAR) DO DEL %%x /p
...
The current directory for the .bat file is:
G:\MyApplication\

When I execute this batch file, on the G: drive it crashs with the message

General failure reading drive G:
Abort, Retry, Fail? F
Fail on INT24

When I execute the whole operation on the local computer it works properly.
When I replace the line in the batch file with

 del .\OBJ\*.VAR 

the batch file steps over this line bat crashs
at the end, when I want to rename my exe file,
with the same error. It seems like the files are locked for another operation.
This batch file was working properly on an older Samba server
on a Linux Red Hat 5.2 operating system in the same conditions.
If You have an ideea or a solution for my problem, please help me.

Thank You.
Radu Comsa

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Problems with charsets and i18n

2004-03-30 Thread Radio Gong 2000 GmbH Co. KG [Technik]
Indeed, I have the same problem, but I am an a production server and cannot 
try UTF-8. Maybe u do this for me and u. If u found the problem please let me 
know. Maybe I can try with u tonight Then I'll let u know too...

Best regards

Sascha




Am Dienstag, 30. Mrz 2004 15:06 schrieb Ralf Tomczak:
 I tried this, but AFAIK only unix charset is responsible for filessystem to
 smb mappings. Unfortunally the error still exists (did you tried explicitly
 to create filenames with three types of ticks?).

 Anyway, thank you.
 Ralf

 --
 Name: Ralf Tomczak
 Firma:scitech it solutions GmbH
 Adresse:  Neuendorfstrae 18 a
   16761  Hennigsdorf
   Deutschland

 Geschftlich: +49 (03302) 559505
 Mobiltelefon: +49 (0173) 6040312
 Fax geschftl.:   +49 (03302) 559320
 E-Mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Webseite: http://www.scitech-gmbh.de

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of Radio Gong 2000 GmbH  Co. KG [Technik]
  Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 1:40 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [Samba] Problems with charsets and i18n
 
 
  Use:
 
  dos charset = ISO8859-15
  unix charset = ISO8859-15
  display charset = ISO8859-15
 
  It works fine for me...
 
  Am Dienstag, 30. Mrz 2004 12:53 schrieb Ralf Tomczak:
   Hello list,
  
   probably a known issue (but I haven't found a link yet):
  
   I'm using 3.0.2a with 'unix charset = ISO8859-15' and get the
   following then a file with ticks is created: - desired:
 
  `'
 
   - displayed: `'
 ^^^
   The euro sign is created correctly in a file name. The
 
  filename will
 
   be displayed in the filesystem correctly.
  
   Then I switch to LATIN1 the ticks are OK (correctly displayed from
   windows client and in the Unix filessystem as well).
  
   I'm using Suse SLES8 but I've seen the issue with debian as
 
  well with
 
   locales set to de_DE.ISO8859-15 (or [EMAIL PROTECTED] on SLES8).
  
   Surplus: The locales seem to be OK and it's possible to
 
  create files
 
   with ticks and euro sign on the console.
  
   Any Ideas?
   Ralf Tomczak
 
  --
  Mit freundlichen Grssen
 
  Sascha Bieler
  ___
  Radio Gong 2000 GmbH  Co. KG
  Sascha Bieler
  Technischer Leiter
  Franz-Joseph-Strasse 14
  80801 Mnchen
 
  Tel.: +49 89 38 166 181
  Fax.: +49 89 38 166 180
  --
  To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
  instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Fax.: +49 89 38 166 180
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] samba RPMS?

2004-03-30 Thread Scott Moseman

http://rpmfind.net/

I find the rpmfind.net site to be a great source for RPMs.

Thanks,
Scott Moseman


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Radio Gong 2000 GmbH  Co. KG [Technik]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 12:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba RPMS?


It's so to say All-In-One...


Am Montag, 29. März 2004 23:24 schrieb Yeri Swamy:
 
 Hi

 I have Redhat 9. To download latest samba  i went to the following
site:-

 http://us4.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/RedHat/RPMS/i386/9.0/

 i can see only one samba RPM
 what about samba-common  samba-client?
 Are these 2 built into samba or we have to do build this

 As i know earlier we used to have 3 RPMS

 1.Samba-common
 2 Samba
 3.Samba-client

 with Best Regards
 ys
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] samba is extremly slow! (a bit long)

2004-03-30 Thread Preisinger ron
Hello Everybody.

First of all sorry for my bed english.

I am in a very big trouble. I migrated our Novell to samba 3.0.2a a week 
ago. It works, but it is very-very slow! The novell is on a PII 
233Mhz/384MB SDRAM/SCSI2 hdds, the samba is on PIV 2Ghz/1GB DDRRAM/SCSI 
UW320 hdds in raid5, and the novell is much-much faster! I have read the 
archive for long days, but everything I founded about the this has not 
solved my problem.
The main problem is when more than one people want to use a file it get 
slower and slower and slower... and I don't understand why?

I applied these registry patches founded in the archive

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters]
EnableSecuritySignature=dword:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters]
EnableOplocks=dword:
but nothing changes.

The smb.conf:

[global]
   dos charset = CP852
   workgroup = TGI_HU
   netbios name = CERBERUS
   server string = TGIhu fileserver
   min passwd length = 7
   obey pam restrictions = Yes
   pam password change = Yes
   username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
   restrict anonymous = 1
   client lanman auth = No
   client plaintext auth = No
   log level = 1
   debug level = 0
   acl compatibility = win2k
   profile acls = no
   time server = Yes
   server signing = no
   change notify timeout = 180
   add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g machines -c 
'Machine Account' -s /bin/false -M %u
   logon script = %u.bat
   logon path =
   logon drive = H:
   domain logons = Yes
   os level = 999
   lm announce = Yes
   lm interval = 10
   preferred master = Yes
   domain master = Yes
   wins proxy = Yes
   wins support = Yes
   ldap ssl = no
   message command = /usr/local/bin/LinPopUp
   remote announce = 9.1.1.1
   idmap uid = 1-2
   idmap gid = 1-2
   template homedir = /home/%U
   admin users = @domadmins, root, aron, szucs
   printer admin = @domadmins, root, aron, szucs
   create mask = 0770
   security mask = 0770
   directory mask = 0770
   directory security mask = 0770
   hide unreadable = Yes
   blocking locks = no

[netlogon]
   path = /var/samba/netlogon
   inherit permissions = Yes
   browseable = No
   root preexec = /usr/bin/gen_logon_script.pl %u %N %m %a %I
   root postexec = rm -f /var/samba/netlogon/%u.bat
   vfs objects = audit
[homes]
   comment = Home Directories Volume
   read only = No
   inherit acls = Yes
   browseable = No
   vfs objects = recycle audit
   recycle:keeptree = 1
   recycle:versions = 1
[tgi]
   comment = TGI T Volume
   path = /mnt/server/tgi/T
   read only = No
   inherit acls = Yes
   vfs objects = recycle audit
   recycle:keeptree = 1
   recycle:versions = 1
Has anybody any idea? I would be very happy if you can help!

Thank You!
Aron
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Problems with charsets and i18n

2004-03-30 Thread Ralf Tomczak
Thanks for your help. UTF-8 isn't really a solution because some of my
systems are not unicode aware and the file names are simply unreadable that
way. But does anyone know how relies 'unix charset' to the locales of the
system?

Good news for you: utf8 works fine. Sadly I need LATIN9 ... :(

Regards,
Ralf

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of Radio Gong 2000 GmbH  Co. KG [Technik]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 3:20 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Samba] Problems with charsets and i18n
 
 
 Indeed, I have the same problem, but I am an a production 
 server and cannot 
 try UTF-8. Maybe u do this for me and u. If u found the 
 problem please let me 
 know. Maybe I can try with u tonight Then I'll let u know too...
 
 Best regards
 
 Sascha
 
 
---snip---


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Can't re-add NT box to domain

2004-03-30 Thread Chris Garrigues
 From:  Chris Tepaske [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date:  Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:58:24 +1000

 Can you join other computers to the domain?

Yes, all the 2000 and XP boxes are fine.  It's just this one box.

Chris

-- 
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions   http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX  78703-5074  512-322-0180

If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't 
   learned anything.




pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] password capture / synchronisation

2004-03-30 Thread Simon Oliver
On the Windows PDC I can use a filter DLL to capture password and sync them
to the LDAP server.

I want to replace my current Windows NT4 domain controller with a samba
based PDC utilizing LDAP.

How can I capture samba password changes so that I can update the LDAP
passwords.  And similarly, how can I capture LDAP password changes to update
samba passwords?

Thanks

-- 
  Simon Oliver

  
  

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] samba is extremly slow! (a bit long)

2004-03-30 Thread David Brodbeck
 -Original Message-
 From: Preisinger ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I am in a very big trouble. I migrated our Novell to samba 
 3.0.2a a week 
 ago. It works, but it is very-very slow!

The first thing I would do is rule out a network problem.  Try using FTP or
SCP to copy a file to and from the Samba server from another machine.  If
that's slow, too, you need to check your network for problems.  Incorrect
duplex settings are one possibility.  (A computer set to full-duplex talking
to a half-duplex hub, or a switch set to full-duplex talking to a computer
set to half.  The collisions will only show up on the half-duplex end.)
It's common for a network with a bad cable or other problems to seem to work
fine for moving small files or ping packets around, but to break down under
a heavier load.

 The main problem is when more than one people want to use a 
 file it get 
 slower and slower and slower... and I don't understand why?

What types of files are you seeing this problem with?  If you're using
shared database type files, like Microsoft Access MDB or Paradox DB files,
you should veto oplocks for those file types.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Configuration Question

2004-03-30 Thread daniel . jarboe
 I am trying to configure Samba 2.2.7 on an IBM PSeries server running
AIX
 5.1
 
 The share appear in network neighborhood, but when ever I try to map
to
 them, Samba is
 asking for a password?

What's your security mode?  I assume if you don't want to be prompted,
it's because you either want no security, or that you do want security
but Samba thinks the credentials you initially supply are incorrect.
Have you looked at the Samba HOWTO?  Anything in the logs?  Your
question is very vague.

Also, Samba 2.2.7 has remotely-exploitable security vulnerabilities, you
should upgrade to at least 2.2.8a.

~ Daniel






---

This message is the property of Time Inc. or its affiliates. It may be
legally privileged and/or confidential and is intended only for the use
of the addressee(s). No addressee should forward, print, copy, or
otherwise reproduce this message in any manner that would allow it to be
viewed by any individual not originally listed as a recipient. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, distribution,
copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information
herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this message.
Thank you.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] samba is extremly slow! (a bit long)

2004-03-30 Thread Preisinger ron
David Brodbeck wrote:

The first thing I would do is rule out a network problem.  Try using 
FTP or
SCP to copy a file to and from the Samba server from another machine.  If
 

Oke, thats correct, but is in the normal usage of clients not in copy 
from server to server..

that's slow, too, you need to check your network for problems.  Incorrect
duplex settings are one possibility.  (A computer set to full-duplex 
talking
to a half-duplex hub, or a switch set to full-duplex talking to a 
computer
set to half.  The collisions will only show up on the half-duplex end.)
 

All of our cards are 3c905c or newer and fullduplex switches.

It's common for a network with a bad cable or other problems to seem 
to work
 

I will test the cables, but I don't think they are wrong.

fine for moving small files or ping packets around, but to break down 
under
a heavier load.
 

What types of files are you seeing this problem with?  If you're using
shared database type files, like Microsoft Access MDB or Paradox DB 
files,
you should veto oplocks for those file types.
 

All of the files what we want to use(example .xls, .doc, .txt, and other 
files of not M$ specific apps). Sometimes the big files are doing the 
same with one user only.
I'll try the veto oplocks for the most frequently used files.

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Cannot start SWAT on Solaris 8 server - libiconv.so.2: open

2004-03-30 Thread Scarff, Christopher J Mr (Titan) 513th
No one on the planet has seemed to answer this question.  After an hour
or so of trying to fix this problem myself, I now have the answer, at
least a temp fix for it.

 

I just linked /usr/local/lib/libiconf.so.2 /lib/libiconf.so.2 in Solaris
9. Seems to get Swat working again.  

 

 

 

 

=

Original message

=

Hi!
 
I'm having some trouble getting SWAT to run on a Solaris 8 server of
mine.
On this server, SWAT is started through inetd:
 
root_s07nfs:/opt/  grep swat /etc/inetd.conf
swatstream  tcp nowait.400  root
/opt/samba-3.0.0/samba/bin/swat swat
 
When I go to http://server:901/, I see this in the browser window:
 
ld.so.1: swat: fatal: libiconv.so.2: open failed: No such file or
directory
 
I suppose this is because libiconv.so.2 is in /usr/local/lib:
 
root_s07nfs:/opt/  ls -la /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.2
/usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.2.1.0
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root other 17 Sep 30 13:18
/usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.2 - libiconv.so.2.1.0
-rwxr-xr-x   1 bin  bin  1138992 Jan 27  2003
/usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.2.1.0
 
I guess, this is because /usr/local/lib isn't in a path the dynamical
linker searches when looking for libraries. I tried to add
/usr/local/lib
to this path by running crle:
 
root_s07nfs:/opt/  crle
 
Configuration file [3]: /var/ld/ld.config
  Default Library Path (ELF):
/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib:/usr/local/ssl/lib
  Trusted Directories (ELF):/usr/lib/secure  (system default)
 
Command line:
  crle -c /var/ld/ld.config -l
/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib:/usr/local/ssl/lib
 
Even after restarting inetd, login via browser is not possible.
 
Hm. When I run smbd, the path configured with crle is used for searching
libraries. 
 
Any ideas how I can get swat to work?
 
Thanks a lot,
 
Alexander Skwar
-- 
/*
 * We used to try various strange things. Let's not.
 */
2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/fs/buffer.c
 





 

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] samba is extremly slow! (a bit long)

2004-03-30 Thread David Brodbeck


 -Original Message-
 From: Preisinger ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 All of the files what we want to use(example .xls, .doc, 
 .txt, and other 
 files of not M$ specific apps). Sometimes the big files are doing the 
 same with one user only.
 I'll try the veto oplocks for the most frequently used files.

Oplocks allow the client to cache the file locally.  They can improve
performance if only one person is using a file.  However, if multiple people
are accessing the same file they can slow things down and increase network
traffic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Error in logs regarding samba

2004-03-30 Thread Jody Cleveland
Hello,

I'm running redhat 3 enterprise server as. I installed samba during the
install, and it's been running for about a week now. I looked in the
LogWatch, and noticed this bit:

 - samba Begin  


**Unmatched Entries**
auth/auth_domain.c:check_ntdomain_security(289)
check_ntdomain_security: could not fetch trust account password for
domain 'WALSDOMAIN' : 125 Time(s)
nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_browse_packet(1050)  process_browse_packet:
Discarding datagram from IP 172.30.2.62. Source name MYSTIQUE00 is one
of our names ! : 307
Time(s)

 -- samba End - 

What does that mean? I tried searching google for answers, and got more
lost. How would I go about correcting this?

- Jody Cleveland
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] WINS / port 445 question

2004-03-30 Thread mrojava4
On one XP Pro client, I disabled WINS (removed the address of the WINS
server), so name resolution is done by broadcast.  In doing an ethernet
trace of this client's interaction with my samba server (3.0.2a), I
noticed that there was no traffic on port 445.  All data traffic was on
port 139.  Is this coincidence or does disabling WINS on the client force
netbios over TCP/IP?

My configuration is samba 3.0.2a configured as a PDC.  I am still using
smbpasswd.

My reason for doing this is that I am trying to get some understanding of
a getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
which is happening all night long.  It is being logged only for our XP Pro
PC's.  We don't see it on our W98 PC's and don't have any W2000 PC's.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Re: Purpose of param. time server ?

2004-03-30 Thread M. Vancl

Raphaël RIGNIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 By default, Windoze XP Pro Workstations look for the (S)NTP service on the
 PDC to synchronize with.
 If your Samba server is a PDC, then yes, you could use this option and
 configure NTP service on the Samba Box. There is nothing to do with your
XP
 pro workstations, if tey are members of the domain.

 If your workstations are XP Home or in Workgroup mode, it is NOT
automatic.
 You must configure the w32time service to syncrhonize to the IP address of
 your local NTP server (by default it's time.microsoft.com or something
like
 that).

 To see exactly what your Windows workstation is doing with time, you can
use
 w32time service in debug mode
 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;816043

Thanks for your explanation. Its new for me and it seems to lead me to right
understanding of time sync on WinXP.

I had done some experimet:
My workstation is WinXP Pro, DC is SAMBA 3.0.2 with time server = yes,
without running ntpd on this server now.
Clock setting on XP (3rd card / Internet time - I'm not sure of right
english label of it) is by default disabled (empty checkbox). Formerly on
this wkst. was done some experiments with single ntp server in our LAN
(router Cisco).
I configured debug log of w32time and restarted computer. Entries in log are
interesting.
It seems, after reboot was made 3 attempts to use strange IP address
(169.254.148.84 is unknown for me):
= 147281 12:15:26.8281250s - NtpProvider: Created 2 sockets (1
listen-only): 169.254.148.84:123, (127.0.0.1:123)
After it, attempts to poll some ntp peers (peer list contents is not
displayed) are made and got response from my earlier tested internal ntp
server. I don't know why, because I deleted it from server list from
registry (key
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\DateTime\Servers) before
reboot.
But most important is - there are logged no attempts to sync clock with my
samba server and additionally tcpdump (port 123) on it don't caught any such
attempt.
Conclusion: It seems not be true that XP Pro wkst. looks by default (or
based on option time server) to ntp service on my SAMBA PDC. Curiously it
uses another ntp server on my LAN but I don't know why...
Probably the best but not nice solution is to stop researching how to
exploit time server option and explicitly set up internal ntp server in
clock settings on all WinXP workstations. It's annoying.

M. Vancl



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Negative caching of DNS queries never expires?

2004-03-30 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi!

I was doing some tests with a samba 3.0.2a server set up to be a wins server
and to do dns proxy, and I have found that when you queried nmbd for a name
ahta was not on wins db or found on DNS, the negative response is cached
either for a really long time or forever, in such a way that even though you
add the name to the DNS, you won't get a positive answer out of nmbd
anymore.

I have tried solving this by lowering the minimum ttl in my soa as well as
soa's ttl, and also using the option name cache timeout of samba, setting
it to 0 (no cache) and to low values, but I haven't been lucky with any of
these.

Is this supposed to be like that?
Does anybody have any idea on how to solve this issue?

If this seems a problem and you need more info to try to diagnose it, don0t
hesitate to ask.

Regards...
-- 
Manty/BestiaTester - http://manty.net
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] W2K3 Server + RAS + Samba 3.0 Domain

2004-03-30 Thread Beschorner Daniel
Hi!

 On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 00:32, Daniel Holtkamp wrote:
  Hi !
  
  I´m trying to figure out if it´s possible to add a W2K3 Server into a
  Samba 3.0 Domain and then have the RAS-Service on the W2K3 server
  authenthicate against the Samba Domain.
  
  Bringing the 2K3 into the Domain was not much of a problem, working fine
  so far, i can log on using Domain users etc.
  
  But i´ve been trying for a week now and i can´t get the RAS Service
  working properly. It always complains that it can´t authenticate the
  user on the Domain, but from the logs it´s not even trying to.
  
  Of course i asked google and searched this list but the closest thing i
  found was about Win2000 RAS ... and it was a post about that not working
  either.
 
 We didn't have the 'dialin' privilege stored.  Samba HEAD is slowly
 gaining privileges now.
 
  Question: Anyone ever gotten this to work ? With a 2K or 2K3 Server ?

Yes, it works for me at least with W2K.

Two things are necessary:

1. the SambaMungedDial attribute in the ldapsam backend (I believe since
3.0.1 in the scheme), don't know if there are any other backends supporting
it. This allows you the set the RAS allowed switch in user manager for
domains.

2. this evil patch to bypass the samba function access check

--- srv_samr_nt.c.orig  Tue Feb 10 10:44:51 2004
+++ srv_samr_nt.c   Tue Mar 30 18:13:48 2004
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@

 NTSTATUS access_check_samr_function(uint32 acc_granted, uint32
acc_required, const char *debug)
 {
+   return NT_STATUS_OK;
DEBUG(5,(%s: access check ((granted: %#010x;  required: %#010x)\n,
debug, acc_granted, acc_required));
if ((acc_granted  acc_required) != acc_required) {


Without this patch you'll see the known message cannot authenticate... in
Windows and this

[2004/03/30 18:10:10, 2]
rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:access_check_samr_function(115)
  _samr_lookup_domain: ACCESS DENIED (granted: 0x0020;  required:
0x0010)

in the logs.


It's dirty and for my own use, but maybe no problem for developers to work
out a clean solution?!?

Daniel




 
 No, but I've got it working with 'Samba RAS' ;-)
 
 http://hawkerc.net/staff/abartlet/comp3700
 
 This applies just as well to modem dial-ins as to VPNs.  I hope to clean
 it up a bit more, and get it into the PPPd distribution.
 
 See also the updated patch in that directory.
 
 Andrew Bartlett
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] force user not working

2004-03-30 Thread Chris
Hello.

I am making a new samba server.  My old samba server was a RedHat machine 
(6.2) with samba 2.0.7 on it.  My new samba server is a Gentoo machine with 
Samba 3.0.2a.

Aside from the fact that I am now using ADS instead of a traditional NT4 
domain -- everything else is the same.  I am keeping all the shares the same, 
I have synced all the gid's and uid's between the two machines, and I rsynced 
all the files and directories over from the old machine so that all the 
permissions and ownerships are the same between the two machines.

For some reason, on the new machine, my Force User = is not working.  All 
files are owned by root no matter what -- not the user that created them.
For all of my common directories (each dept has a commond dir that only their 
dept can access) I have Force User = %U.  This is important, because 
without it the created files do not apply to the user's quota.  

I wish to stress that this did *not* happen with 2.0.7... it worked just as it 
should.

Could someone please give me a hand here?

TIA

Chris

Here is a clip from my smb.conf:

[global]
netbios name = PERSEUS
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=16384 SO_SNDBUF=16384
idmap uid = 1-2
winbind enum users = yes
winbind gid = 1-2
winbind enum groups = yes
dns proxy = no
realm= MY.DOMAIN
workgroup = MYWRKGRP
netbios aliases = PERSEUS
server string = PERSEUS
security = ADS
wins proxy = no
map to guest = Bad User
password server = sisyphus.my.domain
name resolve order = lmhosts wins bcast
time server = Yes
os level = 0
preferred master = No
local master = No
domain master = No
wins server = 10.10.10.10
hosts allow = 127.0.0.1, 10.10.10.
oplocks = No
follow symlinks = No
printing = cups
printcap name = cups
load printers = yes
===snip===

[Members]
path = /home/Members
valid users = +member_serv, chrisd, kurtk, administrator, jeffh
admin users = chrisd, kurtk, administrator, jeffh
read list = +member_serv, chrisd, kurtk, administrator, jeffh
write list = +member_serv, chrisd, kurtk, administrator, jeffh
force user = %U
force group = member_serv
read only = No
create mask = 0660
directory mask = 2770
browseable = No

=/snip=
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Problem using Samba to access nfs mount on linux to EMC share from WinXP

2004-03-30 Thread ajwidene




Our company recently did a poor job of migrating us to a new EMC system for
NAS.  We were immediately faced with its inability to translate permissions
between UNIX and windows since our company hasn't figured out EMC's secure
mode permissions.  Since the EMC maintained the proper UNIX permissions, we
tried using a samba server on linux to share out an NFS mount of the EMC
partition to our Windows clients.  This seemed to be working except some
files and directories simply don't show up in explorer on windows.  We can
type the absolute path to a directory we know exists and then we can see
the contents, but the directory itself won't show up in the listing.  We
thought we could live with this by just typing out the names of files that
didn't show up, but it is now affecting some of our windows tools.  They
can't seem to find the files that are realy there.

Please help! Thank you.
Andrew Widener
ASIC/FPGA Design Engineer
Rockwell Collins, Inc.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] acl on Windows client don't work

2004-03-30 Thread Stefan Kania
Before compiling samba install libacl-devel, or acl-devel, or something
like that (depends on your distro)


Good Luck,

Geza
thank you that solved my problem 

Stefan

-- 
Stefan Kania [EMAIL PROTECTED]



signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] configure failed, with option --with-ads (samba3.0.2a)

2004-03-30 Thread T M
I'm trying to do the same...join samba server to AD domain as domain member...and was 
able to pass this problem by compiling and installing openldap (configure 
--without-bdb --disable-bdb --enable-null --disable-slapd --disable-slurpd) and then 
compiled and installed MIT kerberos (configure --without-krb4 --enable-dns 
--enable-dns-for-kdc --enable-dns-for-realm)
 
How far have you gotten now?
 
I've been able to compile samba but the net ads join OU -U admin just hangs with 
the message:
  Host account for hostname already exists - modifying old account
 
Ted
 

   From: Jeffrey Liu 
   Subject: [Samba] configure failed, with option --with-ads (samba 3.0.2a) 
   Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:23:20 -0800 

-

I'm configuring samba v3.0.2a on Solaris 8 machine.# ./configure   (completed, to be 
sure default is ok)then rm configure.log and configure.status, start again.# 
./configure  --with-ads(failed)checking for ldap_initialize... noconfigure: 
WARNING: libldap is needed for LDAP supportchecking for Active Directory and krb5 
support... yesconfigure: error: Active Directory Support requires LDAP supportbut 
libldap is on this machine:% uname -aSunOS hostname 5.8 Generic_108528-17 sun4u sparc 
SUNW,Ultra-2% pkginfo | grep -i ldapsystem  SUNWlldap  LDAP Libraries% ls -la 
/usr/lib/libldap*lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root  14 Mar 24  2003 
/usr/lib/libldap.so - ./libldap.so.4-rwxr-xr-x   1 root bin   225808 Jan  5  
2000 /usr/lib/libldap.so.3-rwxr-xr-x   1 root bin   225712 Aug 30  2002 
/usr/lib/libldap.so.4The reason to use --with-ads, is that I want to join Samba server 
to Active Directory domain as a member server.  (security = ADS) 



-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] force user not working

2004-03-30 Thread Chris
Okay.

Nevermind.  I got it.

Chris

On Tuesday 30 March 2004 01:18 pm, Chris wrote:
 Hello.

 I am making a new samba server.  My old samba server was a RedHat machine
 (6.2) with samba 2.0.7 on it.  My new samba server is a Gentoo machine with
 Samba 3.0.2a.

 Aside from the fact that I am now using ADS instead of a traditional NT4
 domain -- everything else is the same.  I am keeping all the shares the
 same, I have synced all the gid's and uid's between the two machines, and I
 rsynced all the files and directories over from the old machine so that all
 the permissions and ownerships are the same between the two machines.

 For some reason, on the new machine, my Force User = is not working.  All
 files are owned by root no matter what -- not the user that created them.
 For all of my common directories (each dept has a commond dir that only
 their dept can access) I have Force User = %U.  This is important,
 because without it the created files do not apply to the user's quota.

 I wish to stress that this did *not* happen with 2.0.7... it worked just as
 it should.

 Could someone please give me a hand here?

 TIA

 Chris

 Here is a clip from my smb.conf:

 [global]
 netbios name = PERSEUS
 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=16384 SO_SNDBUF=16384
 idmap uid = 1-2
 winbind enum users = yes
 winbind gid = 1-2
 winbind enum groups = yes
 dns proxy = no
 realm= MY.DOMAIN
 workgroup = MYWRKGRP
 netbios aliases = PERSEUS
 server string = PERSEUS
 security = ADS
 wins proxy = no
 map to guest = Bad User
 password server = sisyphus.my.domain
 name resolve order = lmhosts wins bcast
 time server = Yes
 os level = 0
 preferred master = No
 local master = No
 domain master = No
 wins server = 10.10.10.10
 hosts allow = 127.0.0.1, 10.10.10.
 oplocks = No
 follow symlinks = No
 printing = cups
 printcap name = cups
 load printers = yes
 ===snip===

 [Members]
 path = /home/Members
 valid users = +member_serv, chrisd, kurtk, administrator, jeffh
 admin users = chrisd, kurtk, administrator, jeffh
 read list = +member_serv, chrisd, kurtk, administrator, jeffh
 write list = +member_serv, chrisd, kurtk, administrator, jeffh
 force user = %U
 force group = member_serv
 read only = No
 create mask = 0660
 directory mask = 2770
 browseable = No

 =/snip=
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] force user not working

2004-03-30 Thread Chris
:0)

Just kidding.  I wouldn't do that to you guys :0)

I just hate it when people get the answer they want, and then don't post the 
solution!  How selfish!

The answer was this: admin users = chris, administrator

Apparently, this is handled differently in 2.0.7 than it is in 3.0.2a.  3.0.2a 
basicly says that anyone on the admin list is effectively root.  Since I was 
testing it with my account, it was setting my user to root, and hence any 
file I made was owned by the man.

I am simply going to do away with admin users, since I have no real use for 
that anymore anyway.

ciao.

Chris





On Tuesday 30 March 2004 02:43 pm, Chris wrote:
 Okay.

 Nevermind.  I got it.

 Chris

 On Tuesday 30 March 2004 01:18 pm, Chris wrote:
  Hello.
 
  I am making a new samba server.  My old samba server was a RedHat machine
  (6.2) with samba 2.0.7 on it.  My new samba server is a Gentoo machine
  with Samba 3.0.2a.
 
  Aside from the fact that I am now using ADS instead of a traditional NT4
  domain -- everything else is the same.  I am keeping all the shares the
  same, I have synced all the gid's and uid's between the two machines, and
  I rsynced all the files and directories over from the old machine so that
  all the permissions and ownerships are the same between the two machines.
 
  For some reason, on the new machine, my Force User = is not working. 
  All files are owned by root no matter what -- not the user that created
  them. For all of my common directories (each dept has a commond dir that
  only their dept can access) I have Force User = %U.  This is important,
  because without it the created files do not apply to the user's quota.
 
  I wish to stress that this did *not* happen with 2.0.7... it worked just
  as it should.
 
  Could someone please give me a hand here?
 
  TIA
 
  Chris
 
  Here is a clip from my smb.conf:
 
  [global]
  netbios name = PERSEUS
  socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=16384 SO_SNDBUF=16384
  idmap uid = 1-2
  winbind enum users = yes
  winbind gid = 1-2
  winbind enum groups = yes
  dns proxy = no
  realm= MY.DOMAIN
  workgroup = MYWRKGRP
  netbios aliases = PERSEUS
  server string = PERSEUS
  security = ADS
  wins proxy = no
  map to guest = Bad User
  password server = sisyphus.my.domain
  name resolve order = lmhosts wins bcast
  time server = Yes
  os level = 0
  preferred master = No
  local master = No
  domain master = No
  wins server = 10.10.10.10
  hosts allow = 127.0.0.1, 10.10.10.
  oplocks = No
  follow symlinks = No
  printing = cups
  printcap name = cups
  load printers = yes
  ===snip===
 
  [Members]
  path = /home/Members
  valid users = +member_serv, chrisd, kurtk, administrator, jeffh
  admin users = chris, administrator
  read list = +member_serv, chrisd, kurtk, administrator, jeffh
  write list = +member_serv, chrisd, kurtk, administrator, jeffh
  force user = %U
  force group = member_serv
  read only = No
  create mask = 0660
  directory mask = 2770
  browseable = No
 
  =/snip=
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


FW: [Samba] RID to SID Bug? Share ACL Access Denied

2004-03-30 Thread Aden, Steve
Hi,
Is this problem related to this bug?
Bugzilla Bug 1165  
   Samba ADS Kerberos login doesnt resolve correct groups when smbd is
su'ing to the uid 
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1165

Anyone? Please respond. I am desperate to get this working.

Thank you,
Steve

-Original Message-
From: Aden, Steve 
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] RID to SID Bug? Share ACL Access Denied


Hello,
I have been trying to work through an Access Denied problem and
have found that the user rid is not getting mapped properly. I have yet
to figure out where the assigned rid is coming from, but I know is that
is incorrect. In the log (level 10) for the connecting computer, I see:

pdb_set_user_sid_from_rid:
 setting user sid S-1-5-21-74637098-2648309090-13861X-21006 from rid
21006

There are two problems here. One the rid should be 1586 as verified with
rpcclient. Also the remainder of the sid does not match the W2K ADS
domain the samba server has been joined to. Instead it is the SID of the
domain for the samba server as verified with net getlocalsid:
SID for domain SAMBASERVER is: S-1-5-21-74637098-2648309090-13861X

net ads status shows the SID for the SAMBASERVER:
distinguishedName: CN=sambaserver,CN=Computers,DC=domain,DC=com
objectSid: S-1-5-21-1202660629-1292428093-18016X-1588

The Winbind log shows the correct lookup of the user and sid from the
W2K ADS domain. Since the sid doesn't actually represent the user, the
share acl's do not match and causes denial to the share. Tdbdump of the
winbindd_idmap.tdb shows the user's UID and actual SID. The UID matches
what is listed using getent passwd.

The commands wbinfo, getent, smbclient -k all work. I can kinit a user
and access Windows shares from the Samba server, but users cannot
connect to the Samba server by name from a Windows client. They can
access by ip address, but as I understand it, that method does not use
kerberos.

This is 3.0.2a-1 on Redhat 9.0 with security = ADS.

I have searched the Samba list archives and read man pages and the
HOWTO, but haven't been able find an answer to why this is happening.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.


Thank you,
Steve Aden

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver
this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message
and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Opinions, conclusions and
other information contained in this message that do not relate to
official business shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
ITS
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

_
This message was content-scanned by IXC Shield 
Powered by GatewayDefender - BF08d9f679.0001.mml
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] net ads join Hanging

2004-03-30 Thread T M
Hi all,
 
I'm trying to join a samba server to the Active Directory domain as a domain member.  
However, net ads join OU -U admin just sits there after this message:
 
[2004/03/30 09:43:49, 0] libads/ldap.c:ads_add_machine_acct(1006)
  Host account for xsfstst1 already exists - modifying old account
 
Any clues?  Below is what I have done.  Is what I have done correct in what I want to 
accomplish?  Am I missing something?
 
   server:  solaris 8
   compiled and installed openldap 2.1.25
  (configure --without-bdb --disable-bdb --enable-null --disable-slapd 
--disable-slurpd)
   compiled and installed MIT Kerberos 1.3.2
  (configure --without-krb4 --enable-dns --enable-dns-for-kdc 
--enable-dns-for-realm)
   compiled and installed Samba 3.0.2a
  (configure --with-smbwrapper --with-dce-dfs --with-ads --with-smbmount 
--with-pam --with-acl-support --with-winbind --enable-cups --with-automount)
 
/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf
   security = ADS
   realm = DOM1.COMP.COM
   netbios name = xsfstst1
   password server = kdc01.dom1.comp.com
   encrypt passwords = yes
   log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m
   log level = 3
   max log size = 100
   socket options = TCP_NODELAY 
   wins server = rnumswinsg1.nut.roche.com
   winbind use default domain = yes

/etc/krb5.conf
[libdefaults]
default_realm = DOM1.COMP.COM
dns_lookup_realm = true
dns_lookup_kdc = true
default_tkt_enctypes = des-cbc-md5 des-cbc-crc
default_tgs_enctypes = des-cbc-md5 des-cbc-crc
[realms]
DOM1.COMP.COM = {
kdc = kdc01.dom1.comp.com
kdc = kdc02.dom1.comp.com
kpasswd_protocol = SET_CHANGE
kpasswd_server = kdc01.dom1.comp.com
admin_server = kdc02.dom1.comp.com
}
[domain_realm]
.ux.comp.com = DOM1.COMP.COM
ux.comp.com = DOM1.COMP.COM

Thanks,
Ted
 


-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Need Samba 3.0.0 help

2004-03-30 Thread lea
Hello all

I need help and I'm just about at my wits end.
First let me state that I can not give logfiles in email since the Samba
servers are on the secure side of my world and contain sensitive information.
If by my stating my problem, I am hoping that someone will point me in certain
directions that I have not tried.

We have two samba servers on our site.  Both are running Samba 3.0.0. Sun
Server using Solaris 9 Kernel 112233-11.
First one is authenticating to a NT PDC. NT domain.  We have NT's that map
their drives to this and it works just fineUsers could not be happier.
It uses a VERY simple smb.conf file.  The shares are either home or data
directories that are automounted via NIS automounts on our Sun or SGI servers
.   Shares to our servers are functional.


Second one is authenticating to a Windows 2K Server. Windows 2K domain. We
have NT's and W2K's and XP's This does not work well.  It did but for some
reason it just stopped working.  We have no clue what the problem is, but have
to pinpoint the problem.

We work with various domains on our site and we do not have administrator to
the windows desktops.
We do have the Administrator rights on the Windows 2K server.  Not that this
helpsI have no clue what I am doing on the Windows side.

We use the SAME smb.conf file with a few changes.  The workgroup = 2Kdomain,
the netbios name is different.

Both servers were setup for:

[global]
  workgroup = nt or 2k domain
  encrypted passwords = yes
  update encrytped = yes
  password server = one or two
  passwd chat debug = yes
  log level = 5
  log file  = /var/adm/samba.log
  name resolve order = host
  deadtime = 10

[homes]
  path = /home/%u
  read only = No
  browseable = No

All other shares just like homes...very simple.

What happens is that we start the #2 Samba server...  smbd and nmbd start 
All ok...so far
On the windows side in a Command window  do a # net view \\two-samba-server...
  see shares.  there is hope!
Map network drive from NT or XP...   All ok so far
drill down to any directory   it hangs on the windows side.
If I try to create a new folder... it hangs on the windows side.  If you look
at the Home directory on the Unix side, it created the directory.

You can kill the smbd process for the user on the unix server and it will
release the process from the Windows box but you then have to Disconnect the
network drive and remap it.  Not that you would want to since it does not
work.

I got the bright idea today to join the samba server to the domain.  So I did
that by issuing the command:
 net join -w 2Kdomain -U Administrator
It asked for the password..I put it in
It stated:
Joined domain 2Kdomain

This did not work either...

So that is about itJust a note about the LOG files
Everytime I drill down in the directories, the logfile lists all the files of
that directory.  It even states that I was trying to open a .txt file even
though it didn't open.

Any ideas?  I have customers that are developing in the Win2K domain...their
customers are rather ticked...so I have to resolve this.

Thanks for any assistance...

Lea Bavaro
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Need Samba 3.0.0 help

2004-03-30 Thread lea
Jason,
I do not have access to all the NT or XP machines that connect and map drives.
 We are not the administrators.
I did turn it off on one of the XP's that we have.  There was no change.
Any other suggestions?  Possibly something on the server?

Lea
-- 


On Tue, March 30, 2004 3:41 pm, Jason Balicki said:
 Turn off the webclient service on your windows clients.

 This has been known to hang machines when connecting
 to Samba shares.

 HTH,

 --J(K)

-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a.org] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Need Samba 3.0.0 help


Hello all

I need help and I'm just about at my wits end.
First let me state that I can not give logfiles in email since
the Samba
servers are on the secure side of my world and contain
sensitive information.
If by my stating my problem, I am hoping that someone will
point me in certain
directions that I have not tried.

We have two samba servers on our site.  Both are running Samba
3.0.0. Sun
Server using Solaris 9 Kernel 112233-11.
First one is authenticating to a NT PDC. NT domain.  We have
NT's that map
their drives to this and it works just fineUsers could not
be happier.
It uses a VERY simple smb.conf file.  The shares are either
home or data
directories that are automounted via NIS automounts on our Sun
or SGI servers
.   Shares to our servers are functional.


Second one is authenticating to a Windows 2K Server. Windows
2K domain. We
have NT's and W2K's and XP's This does not work well.  It did
but for some
reason it just stopped working.  We have no clue what the
problem is, but have
to pinpoint the problem.

We work with various domains on our site and we do not have
administrator to
the windows desktops.
We do have the Administrator rights on the Windows 2K server.
Not that this
helpsI have no clue what I am doing on the Windows side.

We use the SAME smb.conf file with a few changes.  The
workgroup = 2Kdomain,
the netbios name is different.

Both servers were setup for:

[global]
  workgroup = nt or 2k domain
  encrypted passwords = yes
  update encrytped = yes
  password server = one or two
  passwd chat debug = yes
  log level = 5
  log file  = /var/adm/samba.log
  name resolve order = host
  deadtime = 10

[homes]
  path = /home/%u
  read only = No
  browseable = No

All other shares just like homes...very simple.

What happens is that we start the #2 Samba server...  smbd and
nmbd start
All ok...so far
On the windows side in a Command window  do a # net view
\\two-samba-server...
  see shares.  there is hope!
Map network drive from NT or XP...   All ok so far
drill down to any directory   it hangs on the windows side.
If I try to create a new folder... it hangs on the windows
side.  If you look
at the Home directory on the Unix side, it created the directory.

You can kill the smbd process for the user on the unix server
and it will
release the process from the Windows box but you then have to
Disconnect the
network drive and remap it.  Not that you would want to since
it does not
work.

I got the bright idea today to join the samba server to the
domain.  So I did
that by issuing the command:
 net join -w 2Kdomain -U Administrator
It asked for the password..I put it in
It stated:
Joined domain 2Kdomain

This did not work either...

So that is about itJust a note about the LOG files
Everytime I drill down in the directories, the logfile lists
all the files of
that directory.  It even states that I was trying to open a
.txt file even
though it didn't open.

Any ideas?  I have customers that are developing in the Win2K
domain...their
customers are rather ticked...so I have to resolve this.

Thanks for any assistance...

Lea Bavaro
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] samba 3.0.2a domain member in Windows 2003 domain and MIT 1.3.2

2004-03-30 Thread Moshe Shaham
We recently switched our win2k domain to a native mode. We upgraded our
Solaris 9 samba server from 2.2.8 to version 3.0.2a and configured MIT
Kerberos version 1.3.2
I was able to join to machine as a domain member without any problems:
./net ads join -U moshe
moshe password: 

[2004/03/30 13:26:46, 0] libads/ldap.c:ads_add_machine_acct(1006)
  Host account for shark already exists - modifying old account
Using short domain name -- MYCOMPANY
Joined 'SHARK' to realm 'CORP.MYCOMPANY.COM'  

kinit and klist also work without any problems.

When I am trying to browse the samba shares from Win/XP machine I am getting
the following in the samba log:
[2004/03/30 11:15:26, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:ads_verify_ticket(323)
  ads_verify_ticket: enc type [3] failed to decrypt with error Decrypt
integrity check failed
[2004/03/30 11:15:26, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:ads_verify_ticket(330)
  ads_verify_ticket: krb5_rd_req with auth failed (Bad encryption type)
[2004/03/30 11:15:26, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(173)
  Failed to verify incoming ticket!
[2004/03/30 11:15:26, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(94)
  error string = No such file or directory
[2004/03/30 11:15:26, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(118)
  error packet at smbd/sesssetup.c(174) cmd=115 (SMBsesssetupX)
NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE

This is my krb5.conf:
[libdefaults]
default_keytab_name = /etc/krb5.keytab
default_realm = CORP.MYCOMPANY.COM
dns_lookup_kdc = false
dns_lookup_realm = false

[realms]
CORP.MYCOMPANY.COM = {
kdc = corpdc.corp.mycompany.com
default_domain = corp.mycompany.com
}

[domain_realm]
.corp.mycompany.com = CORP.MYCOMPANY.COM
corp.mycompany.com = CORP.MYCOMPANY.COM
[logging]
default = FILE:/var/krb5/kdc.log
kdc = FILE:/var/krb5/kdc.log
kdc_rotate = {

# How often to rotate kdc.log. Logs will get rotated no more
# often than the period, and less often if the KDC is not used
# frequently.

period = 1d

# how many versions of kdc.log to keep around (kdc.log.0, kdc.log.1, ...)

versions = 10
}

[appdefaults]
kinit = {
renewable = true
forwardable= true
}

This is my smb.conf:
netbios name = shark
workgroup = MYCOMPANY
realm = CORP.MYCOMPANY.COM
server string = Samba Server
log file = /opt/samba3.0/var/log.%m
log level = 5
max log size = 50
security = ads
local master = no
os level = 0
domain master = no
preferred master = no
wins support = no
wins server = 10.70.130.2, 10.80.20.4
dns proxy = no
password server = corpdc.corp.mycompany.com  
encrypt passwords = yes
idmap uid = 1-2
idmap gid = 1-2
template homedir = /home/%D/%U
template shell = /bin/bash
winbind separator = +

I searched this list and I found similar posting but no answer. Can someone
please help?

Thanks,
Moshe
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Can't re-add NT box to domain

2004-03-30 Thread Chris Tepaske
Maybe then your problem isn't samba but your NT box. To confirm this see if
you cam remove an existing domain member from the domain and then re-join
it. If that works then you have a problem with that NT 4 box and you will
probably need to re-build or if it fails then you have a problem with your
Samba PDC. Just a way of narrowing down the problem.

Cheers

Chris 

-Original Message-
From: Chris Garrigues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, 31 March 2004 12:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Craig White'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Can't re-add NT box to domain 

 From:  Chris Tepaske [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date:  Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:58:24 +1000

 Can you join other computers to the domain?

Yes, all the 2000 and XP boxes are fine.  It's just this one box.

Chris

-- 
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions   http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX  78703-5074  512-322-0180

If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't 
   learned anything.



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Need Samba 3.0.0 help

2004-03-30 Thread Paul Gienger
You can always install a basic web server on the samba box to give a 
quick 'No' rather than waiting for windows to time out waiting.

Watch the logs and you'll see lots of 404's.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Jason,
I do not have access to all the NT or XP machines that connect and map drives.
We are not the administrators.
I did turn it off on one of the XP's that we have.  There was no change.
Any other suggestions?  Possibly something on the server?
Lea
 

--
Paul Gienger Office:701-281-1884
Applied Engineering Inc. Cell:  701-306-6254
Information Systems Consultant   Fax:   701-281-1322
URL: www.ae-solutions.commailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Can't re-add NT box to domain

2004-03-30 Thread Chris Garrigues
 From:  Chris Tepaske [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date:  Wed, 31 Mar 2004 07:58:43 +1000

 Maybe then your problem isn't samba but your NT box. To confirm this see if
 you cam remove an existing domain member from the domain and then re-join
 it. If that works then you have a problem with that NT 4 box and you will
 probably need to re-build or if it fails then you have a problem with your
 Samba PDC. Just a way of narrowing down the problem.

I suspect it won't surprise you if I say that we've already taken other 
machines out of the domain and put them back in again.  I've never thought it 
was a samba problem and from the beginning thought that something bogus was 
cached in the NT box.

Chris

-- 
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions   http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX  78703-5074  512-322-0180

If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't 
   learned anything.




pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] What's the solution? Multiple users accessing Samba from terminal server

2004-03-30 Thread Ciarochi, Anthony
I've seen a lot of mention of this problem on this list, and via google,
but no solutions that I can follow.  Can somebody please clue me in?

 

I have a terminal server, with multiple users, who need to access shares
from a Samba server.  The first user has no problem, but subsequent
users fail, unless I first kill the smbd process.

 

Important trivia (maybe):

 

1 - We did not have this problem until we migrated our authentication
from NT4 domain controllers to Active Directory.

 

2 - We only have this problem on Win2k terminal servers.  XP systems,
single user Win2k systems, and Win2003 terminal servers are OK.

 

3 - If one user has a drive mapped, and we kill smbd to allow a second
user to map a drive, the first user CAN STILL MAP A DRIVE.  This can be
repeated over and over, to get many people mapped, but it is obviously a
pain, and appears to have a temporary effect (apparently something
cached somewhere)

 

4 - If we change the netbios name in smb.conf between each user, then we
can also get multiple users to map drives.

 

5 - Our Samba servers are running Solaris 2.6, Samba v 2.2.8a

 

TIA 

 

- A

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Windows printing problems to Samba3.2

2004-03-30 Thread Clay Fandre
Help! I'm in the process of migrating my companies Windows NT print
server to Samba 3.2. (yea) But I'm running into a few problems. (boo)
I've searched the archives and google with no success...

I have about 15 clients testing out the new server, mainly Win2k. Some
work fine, but others have problems connecting, getting the Unable to
Connect message in the printer folder.

Here is the log.smbd messages:

[2004/03/30 15:42:35, 2] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(746)
  error connecting to 192.168.115.56:139 (Invalid argument)
[2004/03/30 15:42:35, 1] libsmb/cliconnect.c:cli_connect(1261)
  Error connecting to 192.168.115.56 (Invalid argument)
[2004/03/30 15:42:35, 0]
rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:spoolss_connect_to_client(2588)
  spoolss_connect_to_client: unable to connect to SMB server on
machine LINUS2. Error was : SUCCESS

This occurs for a few different clients, all running Windows 2000.
Anyone have any ideas?

I am also getting this error, but I'm not sure if it's related or not:

[2004/03/30 15:42:07, 2]
rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:find_printer_index_by_hnd(268)
  find_printer_index_by_hnd: Printer handle not found:
find_printer_index_by_hnd: Printer handle not found:
close_printer_handle: Invalid handle (OTHER:19846:20066)
[2004/03/30 15:42:07, 2]
rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:find_printer_index_by_hnd(268)
  find_printer_index_by_hnd: Printer handle not found:
find_printer_index_by_hnd: Printer handle not found:
close_printer_handle: Invalid handle (OTHER:19846:20066)

Plus things seem to hang for a few minutes when trying to add
printers.

I'm running samba 3.2 binaries on HP-UX 11i. The binaries were
downloaded from the HP-UX Porting Archive. The server is part of a
Windows domain using domain security. I loaded the print drivers using
a Windows 2000 system.

TIA

-- Clay


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Negative caching of DNS queries never expires?

2004-03-30 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 03:03, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
 Hi!
 
 I was doing some tests with a samba 3.0.2a server set up to be a wins server
 and to do dns proxy, and I have found that when you queried nmbd for a name
 ahta was not on wins db or found on DNS, the negative response is cached
 either for a really long time or forever, in such a way that even though you
 add the name to the DNS, you won't get a positive answer out of nmbd
 anymore.
 
 I have tried solving this by lowering the minimum ttl in my soa as well as
 soa's ttl, and also using the option name cache timeout of samba, setting
 it to 0 (no cache) and to low values, but I haven't been lucky with any of
 these.
 
 Is this supposed to be like that?
 Does anybody have any idea on how to solve this issue?
 
 If this seems a problem and you need more info to try to diagnose it, don0t
 hesitate to ask.

There was a bit of discussion about dns proxy breakage on the list a
little while back.  We even had a bug, which we then closed...

The issue appears that for *any* expired record, we don't ask DNS
again.  Have a look on the list for the patch, try it and re-open a bug
if that's really what is going on

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Sharing a USB Printer

2004-03-30 Thread Edwin Humphries
We're trying to share an Epson USB inkjet printer via Samba 3.0.2-7 on our new 
Fedora server.

The share is set up OK, and can be seen and opened from Windows clients. However,
although the Fedora box can print to the Epson, the Windows boxes can't.

All other Samba shares, including a laser printer connected to the parallel port,
work fine.

Does anyone have a clue how to fix this?

Edwin Humphries,
Ironstone Technology Pty Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ironstone.com.au
Phone: 02 4233 2285
Fax: 02 4233 2299
Mobile: 0419 233 051
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Unusual Crashes in winbind

2004-03-30 Thread Brett Stevens
So far we have been working well for a week now. We are using Samba 3.02a on
suse 9. Authentication is against an win3k AD. Apart from a Kerberos ticket
expiring, (a croned restart fixes this) we have one new problem

We found we needed an additional AD server as the primary begun to fail on a
regular basis. So we added one. Now this new server grabs the authentication
requests before the old one and when it does that winbind crashes out with
the following log messages
  Mar 31 08:59:27 frankenstein smbd[23035]: [2004/03/31 08:59:27, 0]
auth/auth_domain.c:domain_client_validate(204)
Mar 31 08:59:27 frankenstein smbd[23035]:   domain_client_validate: unable
to validate password for user bstevens in domain HITHER to Domain controller
\\CHESHIRECAT. Error was NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED.
Mar 31 08:59:27 frankenstein smbd[23035]: [2004/03/31 08:59:27, 0]
auth/auth_domain.c:domain_client_validate(204)
Mar 31 08:59:27 frankenstein smbd[23035]:   domain_client_validate: unable
to validate password for user bstevens in domain HITHER to Domain controller
\\CHESHIRECAT. Error was NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED.
Mar 31 09:00:24 frankenstein winbindd[23132]: [2004/03/31 09:00:24, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(36)
Mar 31 09:00:24 frankenstein winbindd[23132]:
===
Mar 31 09:00:24 frankenstein winbindd[23132]: [2004/03/31 09:00:24, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(37)
Mar 31 09:00:24 frankenstein winbindd[23132]:   INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in
pid 23132 (3.0.2a-SuSE)
Mar 31 09:00:24 frankenstein winbindd[23132]:   Please read the appendix
Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection
Mar 31 09:00:24 frankenstein winbindd[23132]: [2004/03/31 09:00:24, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(39)
Mar 31 09:00:24 frankenstein winbindd[23132]:
===
Mar 31 09:00:24 frankenstein winbindd[23132]: [2004/03/31 09:00:24, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1400)
Mar 31 09:00:24 frankenstein winbindd[23132]:   PANIC: internal error
Mar 31 09:00:24 frankenstein winbindd[23132]: [2004/03/31 09:00:24, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1408)
Mar 31 09:00:24 frankenstein winbindd[23132]:   BACKTRACE: 11 stack frames:
Mar 31 09:00:24 frankenstein winbindd[23132]:#0
/usr/sbin/winbindd(smb_panic+0x1ab) [0x80c75dc]
Mar 31 09:00:24 frankenstein winbindd[23132]:#1 /usr/sbin/winbindd
[0x80b60ad] 
Mar 31 09:00:24 frankenstein winbindd[23132]:#2 /usr/sbin/winbindd
[0x80b6122] 
Mar 31 09:00:24 frankenstein winbindd[23132]:#3 /lib/i686/libc.so.6
[0x401dfaa8] 
Mar 31 09:00:24 frankenstein winbindd[23132]:#4
/usr/sbin/winbindd(winbindd_pam_auth_crap+0x980) [0x8083af7]
Mar 31 09:00:24 frankenstein winbindd[23132]:#5
/usr/sbin/winbindd(strftime+0x132c) [0x8077a0c]
Ive just begun to investigate this problem but as we are in production with
this error I thought Id drop a quick line to the group and see if anyone
knows about this error.

Thanks in advance

Brett Stevens

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Windows printing problems to Samba3.2

2004-03-30 Thread Gerald Drouillard
Clay Fandre wrote:
Errr, I'm running version 3.0.2a BTW. Not 3.2.
http://hpux.cs.utah.edu/hppd/hpux/Networking/Misc/samba-3.0.2a/
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Clay Fandre wrote:


Help! I'm in the process of migrating my companies Windows NT print
server to Samba 3.2. (yea) But I'm running into a few problems. (boo)
I've searched the archives and google with no success...
A simple work around seems to duplicate the printer in cups and just 
change the name.  Then have the windows clients that are having the 
problem use the new samba unc for the port.  I have upgraded two sites 
from 2.x to 3.x and both have been having this problem.  I see that some 
work has been done in the next version of Samba with printing, but I am 
not sure if it addresses the problem we have been having.  Another 
strange thing about this problem is that it only seems to occur with 
window client printing (Word, Wordpad, etc.) but using the copy /b 
//printerserver/printer command works.

Regards
Gerald Drouillard
http://www.convert2samba.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Subject: Norman Internet Protection - Malware Warning!

2004-03-30 Thread College of Computer Science Secretary
Message sender:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message receiver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message subject: Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Malware found: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Attachment file name: 
Status:  moved to quarantine

Remember to update your NVC installation regularly
http://www.norman.com

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Fwd: recycle.conf and TOUCH bug ?

2004-03-30 Thread ipguy
ok, now i'm starting to wonder if my posts are getting to the list !!
Can you guys see my cries for help ?





 ipguy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 no takers regarding this issue ?
 is anyone experiancing the same problems ?
 
 
 
 
  ipguy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  Hi all
  
  I’m currently using the recycle VFS module with samba.2.2.8a and
  think I 
  may have discovered a bug.
  
  My recycle.conf lists TOUCH as a required option...
  
  mode = KEEP_DIRECTORIES|VERSIONS|TOUCH
  
  However, the files (NOT DIRECTORIES) date/times after being moved
 to
  the 
  recycle area, as specified my recycle.conf, is NOT modified to the
  time of 
  deletion...
  
  -ip.guy 
 
 -- 
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


-ipguy
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Can't re-add NT box to domain

2004-03-30 Thread Chris Tepaske
Agree


-Original Message-
From: Chris Garrigues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, 31 March 2004 8:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Craig White'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Can't re-add NT box to domain 

 From:  Chris Tepaske [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date:  Wed, 31 Mar 2004 07:58:43 +1000

 Maybe then your problem isn't samba but your NT box. To confirm this see
if
 you cam remove an existing domain member from the domain and then re-join
 it. If that works then you have a problem with that NT 4 box and you will
 probably need to re-build or if it fails then you have a problem with your
 Samba PDC. Just a way of narrowing down the problem.

I suspect it won't surprise you if I say that we've already taken other 
machines out of the domain and put them back in again.  I've never thought
it 
was a samba problem and from the beginning thought that something bogus was 
cached in the NT box.

Chris

-- 
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
Trinsic Solutions   http://www.trinsics.com
1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX  78703-5074  512-322-0180

If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't 
   learned anything.



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Do this list still excist ??

2004-03-30 Thread Jan Madsen

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


CVS update: samba/source/libsmb

2004-03-30 Thread vlendec

Date:   Tue Mar 30 08:03:32 2004
Author: vlendec

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libsmb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv925/libsmb

Modified Files:
  Tag: SAMBA_3_0
samlogon_cache.c 
Log Message:
Apply some const

Revisions:
samlogon_cache.c1.1.4.2 = 1.1.4.3

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libsmb/samlogon_cache.c.diff?r1=1.1.4.2r2=1.1.4.3


CVS update: samba/source/nsswitch

2004-03-30 Thread vlendec

Date:   Tue Mar 30 08:03:32 2004
Author: vlendec

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nsswitch
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv925/nsswitch

Modified Files:
  Tag: SAMBA_3_0
winbindd.h winbindd_ads.c winbindd_cache.c winbindd_rpc.c 
Log Message:
Apply some const

Revisions:
winbindd.h  1.33.2.18 = 1.33.2.19

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd.h.diff?r1=1.33.2.18r2=1.33.2.19
winbindd_ads.c  1.43.2.40 = 1.43.2.41

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd_ads.c.diff?r1=1.43.2.40r2=1.43.2.41
winbindd_cache.c1.35.2.25 = 1.35.2.26

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c.diff?r1=1.35.2.25r2=1.35.2.26
winbindd_rpc.c  1.25.2.25 = 1.25.2.26

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd_rpc.c.diff?r1=1.25.2.25r2=1.25.2.26


CVS update: samba/source/rpc_client

2004-03-30 Thread vlendec

Date:   Tue Mar 30 08:26:57 2004
Author: vlendec

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/rpc_client
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5267

Modified Files:
cli_pipe.c 
Log Message:
Janitor merge from 3_0 to HEAD

Revisions:
cli_pipe.c  1.113 = 1.114

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpc_client/cli_pipe.c.diff?r1=1.113r2=1.114


CVS update: samba/source/nsswitch

2004-03-30 Thread vlendec

Date:   Tue Mar 30 08:11:59 2004
Author: vlendec

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nsswitch
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2614

Modified Files:
  Tag: SAMBA_3_0
winbindd_wins.c 
Log Message:
Merge a fix from HEAD to 3_0

Volker


Revisions:
winbindd_wins.c 1.4.2.7 = 1.4.2.8

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd_wins.c.diff?r1=1.4.2.7r2=1.4.2.8


CVS update: samba/source/passdb

2004-03-30 Thread vlendec

Date:   Tue Mar 30 08:14:54 2004
Author: vlendec

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/passdb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2869

Modified Files:
machine_sid.c 
Log Message:
Trivial merge to reduce the diff

Revisions:
machine_sid.c   1.20 = 1.21

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/machine_sid.c.diff?r1=1.20r2=1.21


CVS update: samba/source/groupdb

2004-03-30 Thread vlendec

Date:   Tue Mar 30 09:05:21 2004
Author: vlendec

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/groupdb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12024

Modified Files:
mapping.c 
Log Message:
Cosmetic: Move function to keep alias functions together

Revisions:
mapping.c   1.70 = 1.71

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/groupdb/mapping.c.diff?r1=1.70r2=1.71


CVS update: samba/examples/LDAP

2004-03-30 Thread vlendec

Date:   Tue Mar 30 09:18:24 2004
Author: vlendec

Update of /data/cvs/samba/examples/LDAP
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv15164

Modified Files:
samba.schema 
Log Message:
Commit the LDAP Alias memberSID attribute...

Grrr. I mostly live in source/.. :-)

Volker


Revisions:
samba.schema1.24 = 1.25

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/examples/LDAP/samba.schema.diff?r1=1.24r2=1.25


CVS update: samba/examples/LDAP

2004-03-30 Thread vlendec

Date:   Tue Mar 30 11:16:15 2004
Author: vlendec

Update of /data/cvs/samba/examples/LDAP
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4412/examples/LDAP

Modified Files:
samba.schema 
Log Message:
sambaMemberSID-sambaSIDList

Revisions:
samba.schema1.25 = 1.26

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/examples/LDAP/samba.schema.diff?r1=1.25r2=1.26


CVS update: samba/source/passdb

2004-03-30 Thread vlendec

Date:   Tue Mar 30 11:16:16 2004
Author: vlendec

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/passdb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4412/source/passdb

Modified Files:
pdb_ldap.c 
Log Message:
sambaMemberSID-sambaSIDList

Revisions:
pdb_ldap.c  1.142 = 1.143

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/pdb_ldap.c.diff?r1=1.142r2=1.143


CVS update: samba/source/include

2004-03-30 Thread vlendec

Date:   Tue Mar 30 11:16:15 2004
Author: vlendec

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/include
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4412/source/include

Modified Files:
smbldap.h 
Log Message:
sambaMemberSID-sambaSIDList

Revisions:
smbldap.h   1.11 = 1.12

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/include/smbldap.h.diff?r1=1.11r2=1.12


CVS update: samba/source/lib

2004-03-30 Thread vlendec

Date:   Tue Mar 30 11:16:15 2004
Author: vlendec

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/lib
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4412/source/lib

Modified Files:
smbldap.c 
Log Message:
sambaMemberSID-sambaSIDList

Revisions:
smbldap.c   1.25 = 1.26

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/lib/smbldap.c.diff?r1=1.25r2=1.26


CVS update: samba/examples/LDAP

2004-03-30 Thread vlendec

Date:   Tue Mar 30 12:17:58 2004
Author: vlendec

Update of /data/cvs/samba/examples/LDAP
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv15754

Modified Files:
samba.schema 
Log Message:
Forgot to delete sambaMemberSID attrib definition

Revisions:
samba.schema1.26 = 1.27

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/examples/LDAP/samba.schema.diff?r1=1.26r2=1.27


CVS update: samba/source/libsmb

2004-03-30 Thread jra

Date:   Tue Mar 30 18:38:18 2004
Author: jra

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libsmb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv26722/libsmb

Modified Files:
clifile.c 
Log Message:
Ensure we cope correctly with ea length of zero. Detect torture fail correctly.
Jeremy.


Revisions:
clifile.c   1.54 = 1.55

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libsmb/clifile.c.diff?r1=1.54r2=1.55


CVS update: samba/source/torture

2004-03-30 Thread jra

Date:   Tue Mar 30 18:38:18 2004
Author: jra

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/torture
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv26722/torture

Modified Files:
torture.c 
Log Message:
Ensure we cope correctly with ea length of zero. Detect torture fail correctly.
Jeremy.


Revisions:
torture.c   1.114 = 1.115

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/torture/torture.c.diff?r1=1.114r2=1.115


CVS update: samba/source/libsmb

2004-03-30 Thread jra

Date:   Tue Mar 30 18:38:21 2004
Author: jra

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/libsmb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv26698/libsmb

Modified Files:
  Tag: SAMBA_3_0
clifile.c 
Log Message:
Ensure we cope correctly with ea length of zero. Detect torture fail correctly.
Jeremy.


Revisions:
clifile.c   1.39.2.15 = 1.39.2.16

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libsmb/clifile.c.diff?r1=1.39.2.15r2=1.39.2.16


CVS update: samba/source/torture

2004-03-30 Thread jra

Date:   Tue Mar 30 18:38:21 2004
Author: jra

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/torture
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv26698/torture

Modified Files:
  Tag: SAMBA_3_0
torture.c 
Log Message:
Ensure we cope correctly with ea length of zero. Detect torture fail correctly.
Jeremy.


Revisions:
torture.c   1.63.2.28 = 1.63.2.29

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/torture/torture.c.diff?r1=1.63.2.28r2=1.63.2.29


CVS update: samba/source/param

2004-03-30 Thread jra

Date:   Wed Mar 31 02:20:11 2004
Author: jra

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/param
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22214/param

Modified Files:
loadparm.c 
Log Message:
Added support for OS/2 EA's in smbd server. Test with smbtorture eatest.
New protocol option ea support to turn them on (off by default). Conrad
at Apple may like this as it allows MacOS resource forks to be stored on
a file. Passes valgrind. Documentation to follow.
Jeremy.


Revisions:
loadparm.c  1.538 = 1.539

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/param/loadparm.c.diff?r1=1.538r2=1.539


CVS update: samba/source/include

2004-03-30 Thread jra

Date:   Wed Mar 31 02:20:11 2004
Author: jra

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/include
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22214/include

Modified Files:
smb.h 
Log Message:
Added support for OS/2 EA's in smbd server. Test with smbtorture eatest.
New protocol option ea support to turn them on (off by default). Conrad
at Apple may like this as it allows MacOS resource forks to be stored on
a file. Passes valgrind. Documentation to follow.
Jeremy.


Revisions:
smb.h   1.508 = 1.509

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/include/smb.h.diff?r1=1.508r2=1.509


CVS update: samba/source/smbd

2004-03-30 Thread jra

Date:   Wed Mar 31 02:20:11 2004
Author: jra

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/smbd
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22214/smbd

Modified Files:
posix_acls.c trans2.c 
Log Message:
Added support for OS/2 EA's in smbd server. Test with smbtorture eatest.
New protocol option ea support to turn them on (off by default). Conrad
at Apple may like this as it allows MacOS resource forks to be stored on
a file. Passes valgrind. Documentation to follow.
Jeremy.


Revisions:
posix_acls.c1.87 = 1.88

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/posix_acls.c.diff?r1=1.87r2=1.88
trans2.c1.266 = 1.267

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/trans2.c.diff?r1=1.266r2=1.267


CVS update: samba/source/include

2004-03-30 Thread jra

Date:   Wed Mar 31 02:20:15 2004
Author: jra

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/include
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22365/include

Modified Files:
  Tag: SAMBA_3_0
smb.h 
Log Message:
Added support for OS/2 EA's in smbd server. Test with smbtorture eatest.
New protocol option ea support to turn them on (off by default). Conrad
at Apple may like this as it allows MacOS resource forks to be stored on
a file. Passes valgrind. Documentation to follow.
Jeremy.


Revisions:
smb.h   1.424.2.67 = 1.424.2.68

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/include/smb.h.diff?r1=1.424.2.67r2=1.424.2.68


CVS update: samba/source/param

2004-03-30 Thread jra

Date:   Wed Mar 31 02:20:16 2004
Author: jra

Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/param
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22365/param

Modified Files:
  Tag: SAMBA_3_0
loadparm.c 
Log Message:
Added support for OS/2 EA's in smbd server. Test with smbtorture eatest.
New protocol option ea support to turn them on (off by default). Conrad
at Apple may like this as it allows MacOS resource forks to be stored on
a file. Passes valgrind. Documentation to follow.
Jeremy.


Revisions:
loadparm.c  1.397.2.128 = 1.397.2.129

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/param/loadparm.c.diff?r1=1.397.2.128r2=1.397.2.129


CVS update: samba4/source/lib/ldb

2004-03-30 Thread tridge

Date:   Wed Mar 31 06:36:54 2004
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4750/ldb

Log Message:
Directory /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb added to the repository


Revisions:


CVS update: samba4/source/lib/ldb/tools

2004-03-30 Thread tridge

Date:   Wed Mar 31 06:42:07 2004
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/tools
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5649/tools

Log Message:
Directory /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/tools added to the repository


Revisions:


CVS update: samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb

2004-03-30 Thread tridge

Date:   Wed Mar 31 06:42:07 2004
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5649/ldb_tdb

Log Message:
Directory /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb added to the repository


Revisions:


CVS update: samba4/source/lib/ldb/tests

2004-03-30 Thread tridge

Date:   Wed Mar 31 06:42:07 2004
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/tests
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5649/tests

Log Message:
Directory /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/tests added to the repository


Revisions:


CVS update: samba4/source/lib/ldb/docs

2004-03-30 Thread tridge

Date:   Wed Mar 31 06:42:08 2004
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/docs
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5649/docs

Log Message:
Directory /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/docs added to the repository


Revisions:


CVS update: samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_ldap

2004-03-30 Thread tridge

Date:   Wed Mar 31 06:42:07 2004
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_ldap
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5649/ldb_ldap

Log Message:
Directory /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_ldap added to the repository


Revisions:


CVS update: samba4/source/lib/ldb/include

2004-03-30 Thread tridge

Date:   Wed Mar 31 06:42:07 2004
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/include
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5649/include

Log Message:
Directory /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/include added to the repository


Revisions:


CVS update: samba4/source/lib/ldb/common

2004-03-30 Thread tridge

Date:   Wed Mar 31 06:42:08 2004
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/common
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5649/common

Log Message:
Directory /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/common added to the repository


Revisions:


CVS update: samba4/source/lib/ldb

2004-03-30 Thread tridge

Date:   Wed Mar 31 06:44:52 2004
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6191

Added Files:
Makefile.ldb 
Log Message:
make a more recent snapshot of ldb available to interested
people. Note that I decided to make it LGPL.

ldb is not finished yet, but enough of it is there for people to get
an idea of what it does, and quite a few simple tests work


Revisions:
Makefile.ldbNONE = 1.1
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/Makefile.ldb?rev=1.1


CVS update: samba4/source/lib/ldb/common

2004-03-30 Thread tridge

Date:   Wed Mar 31 06:44:59 2004
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/common
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6216

Added Files:
ldb.c ldb_ldif.c ldb_parse.c util.c 
Log Message:
make a more recent snapshot of ldb available to interested
people. Note that I decided to make it LGPL.

ldb is not finished yet, but enough of it is there for people to get
an idea of what it does, and quite a few simple tests work


Revisions:
ldb.c   NONE = 1.1
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/common/ldb.c?rev=1.1
ldb_ldif.c  NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/common/ldb_ldif.c?rev=1.1
ldb_parse.c NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/common/ldb_parse.c?rev=1.1
util.c  NONE = 1.1
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/common/util.c?rev=1.1


CVS update: samba4/source/lib/ldb/docs

2004-03-30 Thread tridge

Date:   Wed Mar 31 06:45:04 2004
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/docs
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6283

Added Files:
design.txt 
Log Message:
make a more recent snapshot of ldb available to interested
people. Note that I decided to make it LGPL.

ldb is not finished yet, but enough of it is there for people to get
an idea of what it does, and quite a few simple tests work


Revisions:
design.txt  NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/docs/design.txt?rev=1.1


CVS update: samba4/source/lib/ldb/include

2004-03-30 Thread tridge

Date:   Wed Mar 31 06:45:10 2004
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/include
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6395

Added Files:
includes.h ldb.h ldb_parse.h 
Log Message:
make a more recent snapshot of ldb available to interested
people. Note that I decided to make it LGPL.

ldb is not finished yet, but enough of it is there for people to get
an idea of what it does, and quite a few simple tests work


Revisions:
includes.h  NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/include/includes.h?rev=1.1
ldb.h   NONE = 1.1
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/include/ldb.h?rev=1.1
ldb_parse.h NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/include/ldb_parse.h?rev=1.1


CVS update: samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_ldap

2004-03-30 Thread tridge

Date:   Wed Mar 31 06:45:20 2004
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_ldap
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6566

Added Files:
ldb_ldap.c ldb_ldap.h 
Log Message:
make a more recent snapshot of ldb available to interested
people. Note that I decided to make it LGPL.

ldb is not finished yet, but enough of it is there for people to get
an idea of what it does, and quite a few simple tests work


Revisions:
ldb_ldap.c  NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_ldap/ldb_ldap.c?rev=1.1
ldb_ldap.h  NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_ldap/ldb_ldap.h?rev=1.1


CVS update: samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb

2004-03-30 Thread tridge

Date:   Wed Mar 31 06:45:26 2004
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv7057

Added Files:
.cvsignore ldb_index.c ldb_ldif.c ldb_match.c ldb_pack.c 
ldb_parse.c ldb_parse.h ldb_search.c ldb_tdb.c ldb_tdb.h 
ldbadd.c ldbdel.c ldbsearch.c 
Log Message:
make a more recent snapshot of ldb available to interested
people. Note that I decided to make it LGPL.

ldb is not finished yet, but enough of it is there for people to get
an idea of what it does, and quite a few simple tests work


Revisions:
.cvsignore  NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/.cvsignore?rev=1.1
ldb_index.c NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c?rev=1.1
ldb_ldif.c  NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_ldif.c?rev=1.1
ldb_match.c NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_match.c?rev=1.1
ldb_pack.c  NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_pack.c?rev=1.1
ldb_parse.c NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_parse.c?rev=1.1
ldb_parse.h NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_parse.h?rev=1.1
ldb_search.cNONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_search.c?rev=1.1
ldb_tdb.c   NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_tdb.c?rev=1.1
ldb_tdb.h   NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_tdb.h?rev=1.1
ldbadd.cNONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldbadd.c?rev=1.1
ldbdel.cNONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldbdel.c?rev=1.1
ldbsearch.c NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldbsearch.c?rev=1.1


CVS update: samba4/source/lib/ldb/tests

2004-03-30 Thread tridge

Date:   Wed Mar 31 06:45:33 2004
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/tests
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv7204

Added Files:
init.ldif init_slapd.sh ldapi_url.sh slapd.conf start_slapd.sh 
test-index.ldif test.ldif testdata.txt testsearch.txt 
Log Message:
make a more recent snapshot of ldb available to interested
people. Note that I decided to make it LGPL.

ldb is not finished yet, but enough of it is there for people to get
an idea of what it does, and quite a few simple tests work


Revisions:
init.ldif   NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/tests/init.ldif?rev=1.1
init_slapd.sh   NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/tests/init_slapd.sh?rev=1.1
ldapi_url.shNONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/tests/ldapi_url.sh?rev=1.1
slapd.conf  NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/tests/slapd.conf?rev=1.1
start_slapd.sh  NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/tests/start_slapd.sh?rev=1.1
test-index.ldif NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/tests/test-index.ldif?rev=1.1
test.ldif   NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/tests/test.ldif?rev=1.1
testdata.txtNONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/tests/testdata.txt?rev=1.1
testsearch.txt  NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/tests/testsearch.txt?rev=1.1


CVS update: samba4/source/lib/ldb

2004-03-30 Thread tridge

Date:   Wed Mar 31 06:51:34 2004
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9149

Modified Files:
Makefile.ldb 
Log Message:
building with Makefile.ldb now works


Revisions:
Makefile.ldb1.1 = 1.2

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/Makefile.ldb.diff?r1=1.1r2=1.2


CVS update: samba4/source/lib/ldb/include

2004-03-30 Thread tridge

Date:   Wed Mar 31 06:51:40 2004
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/include
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9170

Added Files:
proto.h 
Log Message:
building with Makefile.ldb now works


Revisions:
proto.h NONE = 1.1

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/include/proto.h?rev=1.1


CVS update: samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb

2004-03-30 Thread tridge

Date:   Wed Mar 31 06:51:44 2004
Author: tridge

Update of /home/cvs/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9185

Removed Files:
ldb_ldif.c ldb_parse.c ldb_parse.h 
Log Message:
building with Makefile.ldb now works


Revisions:
ldb_ldif.c  1.1 = NONE

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_ldif.c?rev=1.1
ldb_parse.c 1.1 = NONE

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_parse.c?rev=1.1
ldb_parse.h 1.1 = NONE

http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba4/source/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_parse.h?rev=1.1