[Samba] Email eller vedhæftet fil blokeret
Email eller vedhæftet fil afsendt fra din adresse (eller med din adresse som afsender) er blevet afvist fra Allerød Kommune. Spam og virus bliver typisk sendt under dække af andre afsendere og den blokerede email behøver derfor ikke oprinde direkte fra dig. (Husk dog altid at have et opdateret antivirusprogram på din computer.) Du kan evt. scanne din computer med det gratis' værktøj Stinger fra McAfee som findes på adressen: http://vil.nai.com/vil/stinger Du finder en engelsk vejledning på siden! Hvis din email eller fil derimord er blokeret ved en fejl, kan du kontakte vores Helpdesk på tlf. 70 26 30 48, som så vil hjælpe til med at få din email igennem til kommunen. NB! Denne email kan ikke besvares ! Informationerne fra den oprindelige email er som følger: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba 3.0.5 force user problem
Hi, all: The follow parameters work well in samba 2.2.8a, But I updated samba from 2.2.8a to the latest samba 3.0.5 , I can't write 'test' share! What is the ploblem? [test] path = /pub/test force user = abc write list = jacky valid users = jacky,abc create mode = 0664 directory mode = 0775 Best Regards! Jacky Kim . -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Passwords in 3.0.1rc3 and 3.0.4
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 20:52, rn Hansen wrote: fredag 23 juli 2004 09:54 skrev Andrew Bartlett: Firstly, it's not MD5, but MD4(unicode password). In anyc ase, the usual bug is that people have a 0 last change time set. Either delete it, or make it real. See the release notes for Samba 3.0.3a. Andrew Bartlett Here is an example of last set, they're real: sambaPwdLastSet: 1090242095 sambaPwdMustChange: 1094130095 The thing here is, that when I use smbpasswd to set the password ... then using smbclient, will result in the correct password. But this will result in the wrong password, when trying to logon with Windows XP. If I use mkntpwd from the smbldap suite, then the password will be correct when login from a Windows XP client, but will be incorrect with smbclient. When watching the MD hash created by the two programs, they are the same for the Lanmanager passwords, but are different for the NT Passwords. I'm using SuSE 9.0 and samba 3.0.4... Are these passwords long, or non-ascii? Make sure the 'unix charset' is correctly set, and try Samba 3.0 SVN. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication Developer, Samba Teamhttp://samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Accessing a mounted smb share hangs
Hi,
I am running fedora core 2 with Samba version 3.0.3-5. I have a share
Called storage on windows XP machine named lab0.
When I mount the share using the mount -t smbfs... command to one
mount point and then try to ls on the mount point, the process
freezesand I cannot kill or terminate it, however when I do the same
command and mount it on a different mount point, I can access the
share without problems!!
Always the first mount freezes and the following succeeded. Here is
some relvant info from dmesg
smb_lookup: find //.Trash-haddad failed, error=-5
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
printing eip:
*pde = 1cd65067
Oops: [#1]
Modules linked in: smbfs snd_mixer_oss snd_via82xx snd_ac97_codec
snd_pcm snd_timer snd_page_alloc gameport snd_mpu401_uart snd_rawmidi
snd_seq_device snd soundcore parport_pc lp parport autofs4 sunrpc
ndiswrapper via_rhine mii floppy sg scsi_mod nls_utf8 nls_cp437 dm_mod
uhci_hcd ehci_hcd button battery asus_acpi ac ipv6 ext3 jbd
CPU:0
EIP:0060:[]Tainted: P
EFLAGS: 00210246 (2.6.7)
EIP is at 0x0
eax: da0a3f60 ebx: dd3d22d8 ecx: c015c1c0 edx: dc131fa0
esi: dc131f40 edi: ebp: da0a3f60 esp: dc131f0c
ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Process nautilus (pid: 2732, threadinfo=dc13 task=dc136ef0)
Stack: ecab8291 dc131f40 0002 0004 da0baeb0 c1341320
da099000 c17af138 da8cb740 c015c1c0 dc131fa0 fffdb5b5
da099000 0002 0001 0004
Call Trace:
[ecab8291] smb_readdir+0x311/0x450 [smbfs]
[c015c1c0] filldir64+0x0/0xe0
[c015beeb] vfs_readdir+0xab/0xc0
[c015c1c0] filldir64+0x0/0xe0
[c015c306] sys_getdents64+0x66/0xa0
[c0105ce9] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x71
Code: Bad EIP value.
I would appreciate any help
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] unable to join domain hosted by 3.0 PDC
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 20:25, Craig White wrote: smbadmin group cannot create unix user (machine is in essence a user account too) - unless you have some magic that wasn't revealed in your email. either group map 'Domain Admins' to the 'root' group or add the specific users to root equivalent in smbusers Craig I had precreated the unix account for the machine (hostname$), and added a machine account for it to the tdbsam (via 'smbpasswd -a -m hostname$'), so I didn't think I needed any special privileges for the account joining the domain. But leaving off this for a minute, even if I hadn't, why would I need to give this account any sort of special access? The accounts would be created by child processes of 'smbd', so they should already have root access, correct? -- Jeff Layton [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] samba 3.0.5 force user problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jacky Kim wrote: | Hi, all: | | The follow parameters work well in samba 2.2.8a, But I updated samba | from 2.2.8a to the latest samba 3.0.5 , I can't write 'test' share! | What is the ploblem? | | [test] | path = /pub/test | force user = abc | write list = jacky | valid users = jacky,abc | create mode = 0664 | directory mode = 0775 | | Best Regards! You need to apply the patch at http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/post-3.0.4/ cheers, jerry - - Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) --- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song--Switchfoot (2003) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBAk4OIR7qMdg1EfYRAoXdAJ0d9Bo3Fat7dMD1A9XiCDIWq7cJ+gCaA0cb HRxBGhyBOiT6i6CEPh2SDnc= =diFw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba lock problem?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ALLEN, David (Shipley) wrote: ... | Printing stops working. | ... | [2004/07/22 10:59:07, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36) | === | [2004/07/22 10:59:07, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) | INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 6 in pid 19546 (3.0.2a) | Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection | [2004/07/22 10:59:07, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) | === | [2004/07/22 10:59:07, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1400) I believe that this bug is fixed in 3.0.5 but there not enough information in your logs to be certain. See bug #1147 IIRC. cheers, jerry - - Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) --- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song--Switchfoot (2003) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBAlFkIR7qMdg1EfYRAtiNAJ47+XAgcLXPBNB7tB9PaIrI4jGYywCgmhDf 9dip8J5kC8UFxHQOAMWR+TA= =cJCj -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] why join domain
I've set up a test Samba PDC with a few test shares. From the first Windows PC I logged on to a local computer account and mapped drives to the shares on the Samba PDC. From the second Windows PC I joined the domain and used a logon script to connect to the shares. My question: What are the benefits of joining a Windows PC to the Samba domain? Both arrangements above appear to meet my needs. Thanks for any comments. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] RE: [WBEL-users] ReiserFS on WBL respin1
Hi, Same thing for XFS. I wonder why the f* doesn't Red Hat still refuses to provide at least XFS, ReiserFS and JFS in install time. Regards, Mário Gamito -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Nilson Zegarra Galvez Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 2:17 PM To: WBL List Subject: [WBEL-users] ReiserFS on WBL respin1 Hi, i want to install my DB server with WBL but i see that WBL haven't reiserFS support how i can install or activate the reiserFS support at the install or later?. Thanks JN ___ Whitebox-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Windows Backup
On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 05:17, Olaf Eichhorn, Vermessungsbüro Pfeifer wrote: Hi James, this is an known bug in samba 3.0.4 The number of the bug is 1404. It is solved in 3.0.5 Martijn Moret sent me patched packages of samba 3.0.4 because I need an working update on our server. (thanks Martijn) No, it is not solved in 3.0.5. It was a security release from 3.0.4 with only those 2 changes causing the release. Should be fixed in 3.0.6 (unless another security release gets in there first) -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] The technology that is Stronger, better, faster: Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Error: make: *** [libsmb/clikrb5.o] Error 1
Hi, new to this list. Running samba 3.0.2 under Mac OS X 10.3.4, Darwin 7.4.0. Downloaded 3.0.5 and compiled. I get the warning: make: *** [libsmb/clikrb5.o] Error 1 Samba 3.0.5 has not been installed, when I do $ smbd --version, I still get 3.0.2 Thanks in advance for any help or suggestion. Charly -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] mount smbfs win2K + kerberos
I have the 3.0.5 version of samba on my debian Sarge (or Mandrake 9.1). Im looking for explication about the kerberos support for smbfs mounting. Both Rpcclient and smbclient work fine with the -k option (Kerberos Ticket instead of user login and password) , but the command mount -t smbfs //serverWin2k/share -o krb return me Warning: kerberos support will only work for samba servers. It kerberos only works with Samba ? If yes, when a Linux Machine with Samba could mount a smb (or Cifs) Windows Share with Kerberos ? Thanks ! Bonne chance pour la suite Accédez au courrier électronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net ; 3615 LAPOSTENET (0,34/mn) ; tél : 08 92 68 13 50 (0,34/mn) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] why join domain
Once a windows computer is joined to the domain, it will use the PDC to authenticate for everything, so centralising the user accounts. There is no need to have local accounts on the clients. If you have few accounts then this isn't so much of a bonus Also, there are other nice features of a global account (such as roaming profiles), but you may not want them. Hope this helps, Alex Forrow On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 23:39:16 -1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've set up a test Samba PDC with a few test shares. From the first Windows PC I logged on to a local computer account and mapped drives to the shares on the Samba PDC. From the second Windows PC I joined the domain and used a logon script to connect to the shares. My question: What are the benefits of joining a Windows PC to the Samba domain? Both arrangements above appear to meet my needs. Thanks for any comments. -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] samba 3.0.5 force user problem
You have to insert abc in 'write list', so he will write; altough he can only read. Il sab, 2004-07-24 alle 12:12, Jacky Kim ha scritto: Hi, all: The follow parameters work well in samba 2.2.8a, But I updated samba from 2.2.8a to the latest samba 3.0.5 , I can't write 'test' share! What is the ploblem? [test] path = /pub/test force user = abc write list = jacky valid users = jacky,abc create mode = 0664 directory mode = 0775 Best Regards! Jacky Kim . ___ Umberto Zanatta linuxDidattica tel: +39 (335) 54 71 385 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://linuxdidattica.org ___ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] can't join a w2k workstation on samba
hi * i just set up samba and it seems to working right while connecting from an win98 workstation to the server. login is passed correctly and all shares are shown. When i connect from a w2k workstation to the server, i also could see all shares while i'm logged in localy by an existing user. When i try to set up domain-login i get an error like:named domain does not exist or no connection could be established (translated from german) my question does anybody of you know what could be going wrong? here is my smb.conf -- cut -- server:/# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100) # Date: 2004/07/24 17:53:43 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = E1P server string = Datei- und Programm-Server obey pam restrictions = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *Enter\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n *Retype\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n . username map = /etc/samba/smbusers unix password sync = Yes log level = 10 syslog = 0 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 load printers = No machine password timeout = 86400 add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false -M %u domain logons = Yes os level = 65 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins support = Yes ldap ssl = no panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d admin users = root, ahornig case sensitive = Yes [homes] comment = Privatverzeichnis read only = No case sensitive = No browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /tmp create mask = 0700 printable = Yes browseable = No [print$] comment = Printer Drivers path = /var/lib/samba/printers -- cut -- any possible ideas are welcome andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Machine accounts, Samba 3, NT Domain migration
Problem: Cannot get Windows XP client to logon onto domain when using on the fly machine provisioning Version:SAMBA version 3.0.3-5 OS: Fedora 2 (and other Redhat flavours) Workaround: Change the name of your workstation to ALL BE lower case Notes: Finally Ive cracked this auto machine provisioning issue. Its taken me 4 bloody hours! YOU MUST HAVE lower CASE MACHINE NAMES. They must be completely lower case Can someone in the Samba team please make a note about this Ive not found anything about this on the web anywhere. Paul Thompson -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Webtrends drops connection to samba server (1345 does not help)
I have been tinkering with this problem for a little while now, and someone had previously suggested: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1345 As a possible solution. The description and symptoms sound just like my problem, but even with the patch installed it is still one busted connection. Essentially what happens is that windows XP is connected fine, I can browse the share, open files, etc, etc... All is well and happy. When I fire up webtrends and access the drive it says it can't access the file and also causes xp to disconnect. Double clicking on the share brings it right back though. Any ideas? where should I start with this? Its become a critical problem since reports cant get run and people are starting to grumble. I've also tried 3.0.5 and no luck -- Bill Chmura Director of Internet Technology Explosivo ITG Wolcott, CT p: 888.560.YWEB (9932) e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w. http://www.explosivo.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] why join domain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've set up a test Samba PDC with a few test shares. From the first Windows PC I logged on to a local computer account and mapped drives to the shares on the Samba PDC. From the second Windows PC I joined the domain and used a logon script to connect to the shares. My question: What are the benefits of joining a Windows PC to the Samba domain? Both arrangements above appear to meet my needs. Thanks for any comments. From: Alex Forrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] Once a windows computer is joined to the domain, it will use the PDC to authenticate for everything, so centralising the user accounts. There is no need to have local accounts on the clients. If you have few accounts then this isn't so much of a bonus Also, there are other nice features of a global account (such as roaming profiles), but you may not want them. OK. So by joining a PC to the domain anyone with an account on the Samba PDC can log onto that PC. And, if I also configure roaming profiles the users personal settings will also be loaded. Did I understand this correctly? This is not a feature that has been asked for by any of my users as everyone has their own PC and work area. This sounds like going part way toward a terminal server approach. If I joined each PC to the domain anyway are there any *other* drawbacks or benefits? If I don't join the PC's (WinXP) to the domain can I still get a logon script to run? For the PC that I joined to the domain I disconnected the network cable and rebooted to simulate use of a laptop away from work. At log on I selected the domain and was logged on OK except, of course, no access to network drives. This seemed like an OK result. Would this be the typical approach for a laptop user? Finally, if I logon as user1 on the laptop can I change from one DomainA (at office 1) to DomainB (at office 2) and keep all my personal settings? Again, thanks for any comments. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem joining machines do Samba 3 domain
Hi, I'm trying to configure a Linux machine with Samba 3 + OpenLDAP to be a PDC for some Windows XP machines. I'm following the Samba-3 by Example and it's been all ok except when I try to join a Windows machine to the domain. In the Samba server a get the following errors: [2004/07/24 21:34:56, 1] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_modify_entry(1312) ldapsam_modify_entry: Failed to add user dn= uid=kosh $,ou=People,dc=xpto with: Already exists [2004/07/24 21:34:56, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_add_sam_account(1729) ldapsam_add_sam_account: failed to modify/add user with uid = kosh$ (dn = uid=kosh$,ou=People,dc=xpto) [2004/07/24 21:34:56, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_create_user (2267) could not add user/computer kosh$ to passdb. Check permissions? I'm using the Idealx smbldap tools and have this in the smb.conf file: add user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd.pl -a -m '%u' delete user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-userdel.pl %u add group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupadd.pl -p '%g' delete group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupdel.pl '%g' add user to group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupmod.pl -m '% u' '%g' delete user from group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupmod.pl - x '%u' '%g' set primary group script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-usermod.pl -g '%g' '%u' add machine script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd.pl -w '%u' The script seems to work since the machine user is created in the LDAP database: dn: uid=kosh$,ou=People,dc=xpto objectClass: top objectClass: inetOrgPerson objectClass: posixAccount cn: kosh$ sn: kosh$ uid: kosh$ uidNumber: 1003 gidNumber: 553 homeDirectory: /dev/null loginShell: /bin/false description: Computer structuralObjectClass: inetOrgPerson entryUUID: ab713f8a-71fc-1028-86cf-ec068f83861c creatorsName: cn=admin,dc=xpto createTimestamp: 20040724203456Z entryCSN: 2004072420:34:56Z#0x0001#0# modifiersName: cn=admin,dc=xpto modifyTimestamp: 20040724203456Z Is there some permission issue (maybe in the slapd.conf file)? Can anybody help me? Thanks -- Paulo Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] Eurotux, SA signature.asc Description: Esta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9?= uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] acl handling on delete (performance problem)
Hi all,
I'm debugging a performance problem for a client. Needless to say, the
organisation of their data is such that this problem is really annoying.
Here's the situation:
Samba 3.0.x PDC in a mixed 9x/nt/xp environment, using acls. When trying to
delete a large number of folders from a folder, the 'preparing to delete'
stage takes about half hour.
It's simple to repeat: set up samba pdc, join an xp client into the domain,
map a share with some 4000 folders and try to delete them.
Strace of a smbd proccess in the 'preparing to delete' stage looks like
this:
stat(/mnt/test/test/0220, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=6, ...}) = 0
gettimeofday({1090703949, 903367}, NULL) = 0
stat(/mnt/test/test/0220, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=6, ...}) = 0
getxattr(/mnt/test/test/0220, system.posix_acl_access, 0x11fffe940, 132)
= -1 ENODATA (No data available)
stat(/mnt/test/test/0220, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=6, ...}) = 0
getxattr(/mnt/test/test/0220, system.posix_acl_default, 0x11fffe940,
132) = -1 ENODATA (No data available)
stat(/mnt/test/test/0220, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=6, ...}) = 0
getxattr(/mnt/test/test/0220, user.SAMBA_PAI, 0x1207f0aa0, 1024) = -1
ENODATA (No data available)
For every folder it wants to delete, it walks all the folders doing this. So
for 4k folders we get 16 milion such tests, which take waay too much time.
Are these loops necessary? Can they be optimised?
We've tested ext3+acl and xfs as an underlying filesystem, with no
difference. We also noticed this behaviour on win98 as a client.
Tested on 3.0.2a and 3.0.4, smb.conf attached.
In my own testings i've noticed that with security=share and with anon r/w
public share samba doesn't do any getxattr calls and this whole tests
completes within minutes, as it should. Also, on a linux client mounting the
share via smbmount deleting also takes just minutes.
--
Jure Pear
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] FEC Report to Sender
Incident Information:- Database: d:/lotus/domino/data/mail2.box Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date/Time: 07/24/2004 07:18:52 PM The file attachment / html you sent to the recipients listed above was infected with the Suspicious IFrame.a virus and was deleted. The file attachment message.scr you sent to the recipients listed above was infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus and was successfully cleaned. The cleaned message was delivered successfully to the Federal Election Commission. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba PDC = Expire passwords
Hi all, I have a Samba PDC setup and i was wondering if anyone knows how i can force the users to change passwords ever x days. My network consists of windows type machines as was as linux based machines. Any help would greatly be apprecitated. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] mount smbfs win2K + kerberos
On Sun, 2004-07-25 at 02:42, nicolas.clementz wrote: I have the 3.0.5 version of samba on my debian Sarge (or Mandrake 9.1). Im looking for explication about the kerberos support for smbfs mounting. Both Rpcclient and smbclient work fine with the -k option (Kerberos Ticket instead of user login and password) , but the command mount -t smbfs //serverWin2k/share -o krb return me Warning: kerberos support will only work for samba servers. It kerberos only works with Samba ? If yes, when a Linux Machine with Samba could mount a smb (or Cifs) Windows Share with Kerberos ? No, this means that the server must be running Samba. Win2k has bugs/features that prevent the Kerberos login from actually working. (Due to smbfs using 'DOS' error codes). Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication Developer, Samba Teamhttp://samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Windows 2003 Terminal Server - domain users not being able to log on
I have set up Samba 2.0.4 on Fedora Core 1 as the PDC for the domain, and we have a Win2003 server as a member server w/ Citrix MetaFrame Presentation Server 3.0 installed. Domain users can log in locally just fine, but only local users can log in through Citrix or RDP. When a domain user tries to log on remotely, Win2003 rolls the progress bar for a few seconds, and then responds: The system cannot log you on due to the following error: The specified domain either does not exist or could not be contacted. Please try again or consult your system administrator. Does anyone have any clue what's going on? Samba logs reveal nothing I could understand -- no identifiable error messages. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba PDC = Expire passwords
On Sat, 2004-07-24 at 16:47, Rashaad S. Hyndman wrote: Hi all, I have a Samba PDC setup and i was wondering if anyone knows how i can force the users to change passwords ever x days. My network consists of windows type machines as was as linux based machines. Any help would greatly be apprecitated. man pdbedit Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] why join domain
On Sat, 2004-07-24 at 11:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK. So by joining a PC to the domain anyone with an account on the Samba PDC can log onto that PC. And, if I also configure roaming profiles the users personal settings will also be loaded. Did I understand this correctly? --- yes --- This is not a feature that has been asked for by any of my users as everyone has their own PC and work area. This sounds like going part way toward a terminal server approach. If I joined each PC to the domain anyway are there any *other* drawbacks or benefits? --- of course --- If I don't join the PC's (WinXP) to the domain can I still get a logon script to run? --- no --- For the PC that I joined to the domain I disconnected the network cable and rebooted to simulate use of a laptop away from work. At log on I selected the domain and was logged on OK except, of course, no access to network drives. This seemed like an OK result. Would this be the typical approach for a laptop user? --- I use it on most of my networks --- Finally, if I logon as user1 on the laptop can I change from one DomainA (at office 1) to DomainB (at office 2) and keep all my personal settings? --- No - a machine can only have a 'security account' on one domain. Each user would have a profile that is specific to the domain anyway. It's rather unfair to ask such basic Windows Administration questions to this list. This is a samba list and there are thousands of books, millions of web pages, endless classes and certifications directed towards the advancement of the Microsoft Networking model. I would think that you would be best served by consulting one of them and this list would be better served by helping people configure samba into the networking model that have chosen. Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Missing partition
I have a 30 gb smb partition that shows up fine for the windows clients, and I can see the structure with a console and ls, but all of a sudden smartd does not see it and if I do a df -m it does not show up as a partition. Kinda off topic but where can I turn to find out why?/ thanks --gt -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
svn commit: samba r1581 - branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/libsmb
Author: abartlet Date: 2004-07-24 23:57:07 + (Sat, 24 Jul 2004) New Revision: 1581 Modified: branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/libsmb/passchange.c Log: 'NULL' NTLMSSP is both a pain to get right, and compleatly and utterly pointless. With a well-known session key, we may as well put the password change directly on the wire, with it's own 'crypted with old password' as the protection. This should fix some 'long password change' issues, against Samba in particular. Andrew Bartlett WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/websvn/changeset.php?rep=sambapath=/rev=1581nolog=1
