[Samba] Administering Groups
I have my Samba PDC running :-) How do I administer groups from the samba box? usrmgr.exe runs on the workstation but won't let me see groups samba 3.0.14a-2 with tdbsam TIA Simon -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Unable to rsync in samba share.... please help !!!
Hai All, how i can synchronise to samba share with out changing any Windows user or group permission i tried the following command.. but its keep only the master folder's permission.. but not for al sub folders. after synchronise, while i check rsync comand unable to synchronise with the same Windows user and group permission now i have to set... the windows permission.. after each and every synchronisation this is the command i use.. for synchronisation rsync -vcrRuHWog --progress MMCH /vol08_800/ its successfully synchronise all files.. but not with user and group permission i use -o option to synchronise with same owner permission and -g option to synchronise with same group permission even then the command didnt gived me the correct result that i expect... All the permission i set from Windows 2003 ADS Hope some one can help me... thank you in advance, -- regards, Jerrynikki -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] vfs problem
Sascha schrieb: Hi list, we are running a samba pdc version 3.0.20pre2-1 on sles 8. we are using 2 vfs objects (vscan-clamav and recycle). with vscan-clamav enabled the deleted files on a samba share are not added to recycle directory. When i remove the vscan entry the recycle object works fine. May we only use 1 vfs object with samba? Thanks for help and best regards __ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com Hi, no you can combine any vfs , check your setup Regards -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Homes on different server...
Olivier Houde schrieb: Hi list is there any way to specify on wich server a user's home is ? Let me explain myself... I have a Samba3 PDC here at the head office using LDAP as an authentication backend. We have offices in other cities and we would like them to be on the same domain. All those offices are linked using VPNs. I have no problem to configure LDAP and Samba to work together. The problem is that i want all those offices to be completely independant in case the VPN link goes down. For that, i need to split all my user's home between the BDCs and the PDC (depending in wich office the user is working), if want the users to still have an access to their home and profiles. I have an LDAP master here and a LDAP slave in each office. How can i tell samba that depending on the user, its home is on a different server ? Can i use LDAP for that ? If it's possible, how can i do that ? Should i use an other solution ? Trusted domain instead ? Thanks Olivier Houde Hi, the home dirs of users can be hosted anywhere , just change the home path in ldap Regards -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Administering Groups
Simon Faulkner wrote: I have my Samba PDC running :-) How do I administer groups from the samba box? usrmgr.exe runs on the workstation but won't let me see groups have you setup groupmapping? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Administering Groups
paul kölle wrote: Simon Faulkner wrote: I have my Samba PDC running :-) How do I administer groups from the samba box? usrmgr.exe runs on the workstation but won't let me see groups have you setup groupmapping? Err, not sure! I used the vampire to get the details from the NT4 PDC I am wondering where to look for groups etc! Sim -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Unable to rsync in samba share.... please help !!!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi updatemyself . schrieb: Hai All, how i can synchronise to samba share with out changing any Windows user or group permission i tried the following command.. but its keep only the master folder's permission.. but not for al sub folders. after synchronise, while i check rsync comand unable to synchronise with the same Windows user and group permission now i have to set... the windows permission.. after each and every synchronisation this is the command i use.. for synchronisation rsync -vcrRuHWog --progress MMCH /vol08_800/ its successfully synchronise all files.. but not with user and group permission i use -o option to synchronise with same owner permission and -g option to synchronise with same group permission even then the command didnt gived me the correct result that i expect... All the permission i set from Windows 2003 ADS Hope some one can help me... thank you in advance, Normally I synchronize with the follow command without any problems: rsync -aPx --numeric-ids / someserver:/storage_location This will also migrate user/group identities on the files... kindly regards rOger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDdeqypF3l9rYt4bARAmEQAKCD5m3kWXfscRlGjWVqKmi+3yMX8wCfVl02 9/loReXpvr8XwxZSbeK47wQ= =/LbT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Administering Groups
I am wondering where to look for groups etc! Hmmm, it all seems to be done with net groupmap list It's great, as you peer down into the murk you understand the next layer and you realise there are many more layers of voodoo to go! wish me luck... Sim -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Administering Groups
net groupmap list ntgroup=Domain Admins Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1065375514-2370838480-4047619883-512) - -1 Does this mean I have no group for Domain Admins? Do I need to map them to root? TIA -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] groupmap
Why would I have some NT domains more than once? Did I screp up my import with the Vampire? Should I delete the unmapped ones (Gulp!) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# net groupmap list System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) - -1 Replicator (S-1-5-32-552) - Replicator Guests (S-1-5-32-546) - Guests Recipe (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-1016) - recipe Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1065375514-2370838480-4047619883-513) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-217354674-1388124147-264849902-513) - -1 Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-217354674-1388124147-264849902-514) - -1 Power Users (S-1-5-32-547) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-2542624836-2007811437-2422883089-513) - -1 Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1065375514-2370838480-4047619883-512) - -1 Print Operators (S-1-5-32-550) - -1 Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) - Administrators Sage (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-1005) - Sage Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-512) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-513) - users Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-514) - -1 Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-512) - root Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1065375514-2370838480-4047619883-514) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-513) - -1 Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-514) - nobody Account Operators (S-1-5-32-548) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-2968525064-3424225456-755833301-513) - -1 Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-2968525064-3424225456-755833301-512) - -1 Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-2968525064-3424225456-755833301-514) - -1 Backup Operators (S-1-5-32-551) - -1 Users (S-1-5-32-545) - Users Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-2542624836-2007811437-2422883089-512) - -1 Accounts Dept (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-2003) - acctsdep Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-217354674-1388124147-264849902-512) - -1 Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-2542624836-2007811437-2422883089-514) - -1 Financial Services (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-2005) - finsrvcs Sales (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-1030) - sales TIA -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] net rpc vampire - cannot login to migrated computer accounts
Hello experts, I've migrated our NT4 domain to sambe 3.0.20b/ldap backend with net rpc vampire, and nearly everything works as expected. But one big problem remains: it's not possible to login to the domains member maschines now, because the domain is not available at the moment (translated from german). After the maschine rejoined the samba domain, login works. (But this is not an option for our ~500 maschines...) I have looked at the computer account of one maschine after the migration and after I rejoined the domain manually. There's a difference: after net rpc vampire migration: dn: uid=BIT59$,ou=computers,dc=uni-wh,dc=de objectClass: top objectClass: inetOrgPerson objectClass: posixAccount objectClass: sambaSamAccount cn: BIT59$ sn: BIT59$ uid: BIT59$ uidNumber: 22693 gidNumber: 515 homeDirectory: /dev/null loginShell: /bin/false description: Computer gecos: Computer structuralObjectClass: inetOrgPerson entryUUID: 4de87562-e740-1029-802b-d5f8fbe677cd creatorsName: cn=smbldap-tools,ou=DSA,dc=uni-wh,dc=de createTimestamp: 2005204849Z sambaSID: S-1-5-21-1139895982-289624505-398547282-4370 sambaPrimaryGroupSID: S-1-5-21-1139895982-289624505-398547282-515 displayName: BIT59$ sambaLogonTime: 1131741671 sambaNTPassword: 6D4D1F74BA851B7DB9DBCBA966C00AEF sambaPwdLastSet: 1131727258 sambaAcctFlags: [W ] entryCSN: 2005204858Z#01#00#00 modifiersName: cn=samba,ou=DSA,dc=uni-wh,dc=de modifyTimestamp: 2005204858Z Something wrong here? after the maschine rejoined the domain: dn: uid=bit59$,ou=computers,dc=uni-wh,dc=de objectClass: top objectClass: inetOrgPerson objectClass: posixAccount objectClass: sambaSamAccount cn: bit59$ sn: bit59$ uid: bit59$ uidNumber: 22694 gidNumber: 515 homeDirectory: /dev/null loginShell: /bin/false description: Computer gecos: Computer structuralObjectClass: inetOrgPerson entryUUID: f490cd82-e7b4-1029-8a6d-c4cb6795876f creatorsName: cn=smbldap-tools,ou=DSA,dc=uni-wh,dc=de createTimestamp: 20051112104350Z sambaSID: S-1-5-21-1139895982-289624505-398547282-46388 sambaPrimaryGroupSID: S-1-5-21-1139895982-289624505-398547282-515 displayName: BIT59$ sambaPwdCanChange: 1131878635 sambaPwdMustChange: 1142160235 sambaNTPassword: 22E8E02D746C544A1DB0D183715C2D86 sambaPwdLastSet: 1131792235 sambaAcctFlags: [W ] entryCSN: 20051112104358Z#01#00#00 modifiersName: cn=samba,ou=DSA,dc=uni-wh,dc=de modifyTimestamp: 20051112104358Z Obviously the sambaPwdCanChange and sambaPwdMustChange attributes are missing in the computer account after migration. Could this cause the problem or do I search at the wrong place? Thanks in advance for your support! Christoph -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] groupmap
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 13:28 +, Simon Faulkner wrote: Why would I have some NT domains more than once? Did I screp up my import with the Vampire? Should I delete the unmapped ones (Gulp!) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# net groupmap list System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) - -1 Replicator (S-1-5-32-552) - Replicator Guests (S-1-5-32-546) - Guests Recipe (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-1016) - recipe Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1065375514-2370838480-4047619883-513) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-217354674-1388124147-264849902-513) - -1 Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-217354674-1388124147-264849902-514) - -1 Power Users (S-1-5-32-547) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-2542624836-2007811437-2422883089-513) - -1 Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1065375514-2370838480-4047619883-512) - -1 Print Operators (S-1-5-32-550) - -1 Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) - Administrators Sage (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-1005) - Sage Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-512) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-513) - users Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-514) - -1 Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-512) - root Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1065375514-2370838480-4047619883-514) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-513) - -1 Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-514) - nobody Account Operators (S-1-5-32-548) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-2968525064-3424225456-755833301-513) - -1 Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-2968525064-3424225456-755833301-512) - -1 Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-2968525064-3424225456-755833301-514) - -1 Backup Operators (S-1-5-32-551) - -1 Users (S-1-5-32-545) - Users Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-2542624836-2007811437-2422883089-512) - -1 Accounts Dept (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-2003) - acctsdep Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-217354674-1388124147-264849902-512) - -1 Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-2542624836-2007811437-2422883089-514) - -1 Financial Services (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-2005) - finsrvcs Sales (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-1030) - sales - They are all different SID's There's only 1 of them that matters. The SID of your domain, the rest are pretty much meaningless. It looks like you didn't follow the vampire instructions closely enough. How about the users, what's their SID's look like? # net getlocalsid # pdbedit -Lv|grep SID # net groupmap list The SID's should all the same...with the exception of the RID extensions on the specific objects. When you vampire, you must get the SID from the NT4 PDC, and then set the samba box to the exact same SID, then vampire, then the users, groups, machine accounts, etc. all have the same base SID Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] net rpc vampire - cannot login to migrated computer accounts
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 15:32 +0100, Christoph Peus wrote: Hello experts, I've migrated our NT4 domain to sambe 3.0.20b/ldap backend with net rpc vampire, and nearly everything works as expected. But one big problem remains: it's not possible to login to the domains member maschines now, because the domain is not available at the moment (translated from german). After the maschine rejoined the samba domain, login works. (But this is not an option for our ~500 maschines...) I have looked at the computer account of one maschine after the migration and after I rejoined the domain manually. There's a difference: after net rpc vampire migration: dn: uid=BIT59$,ou=computers,dc=uni-wh,dc=de objectClass: top objectClass: inetOrgPerson objectClass: posixAccount objectClass: sambaSamAccount cn: BIT59$ sn: BIT59$ uid: BIT59$ uidNumber: 22693 gidNumber: 515 homeDirectory: /dev/null loginShell: /bin/false description: Computer gecos: Computer structuralObjectClass: inetOrgPerson entryUUID: 4de87562-e740-1029-802b-d5f8fbe677cd creatorsName: cn=smbldap-tools,ou=DSA,dc=uni-wh,dc=de createTimestamp: 2005204849Z sambaSID: S-1-5-21-1139895982-289624505-398547282-4370 sambaPrimaryGroupSID: S-1-5-21-1139895982-289624505-398547282-515 displayName: BIT59$ sambaLogonTime: 1131741671 sambaNTPassword: 6D4D1F74BA851B7DB9DBCBA966C00AEF sambaPwdLastSet: 1131727258 sambaAcctFlags: [W ] entryCSN: 2005204858Z#01#00#00 modifiersName: cn=samba,ou=DSA,dc=uni-wh,dc=de modifyTimestamp: 2005204858Z Something wrong here? after the maschine rejoined the domain: dn: uid=bit59$,ou=computers,dc=uni-wh,dc=de objectClass: top objectClass: inetOrgPerson objectClass: posixAccount objectClass: sambaSamAccount cn: bit59$ sn: bit59$ uid: bit59$ uidNumber: 22694 gidNumber: 515 homeDirectory: /dev/null loginShell: /bin/false description: Computer gecos: Computer structuralObjectClass: inetOrgPerson entryUUID: f490cd82-e7b4-1029-8a6d-c4cb6795876f creatorsName: cn=smbldap-tools,ou=DSA,dc=uni-wh,dc=de createTimestamp: 20051112104350Z sambaSID: S-1-5-21-1139895982-289624505-398547282-46388 sambaPrimaryGroupSID: S-1-5-21-1139895982-289624505-398547282-515 displayName: BIT59$ sambaPwdCanChange: 1131878635 sambaPwdMustChange: 1142160235 sambaNTPassword: 22E8E02D746C544A1DB0D183715C2D86 sambaPwdLastSet: 1131792235 sambaAcctFlags: [W ] entryCSN: 20051112104358Z#01#00#00 modifiersName: cn=samba,ou=DSA,dc=uni-wh,dc=de modifyTimestamp: 20051112104358Z Obviously the sambaPwdCanChange and sambaPwdMustChange attributes are missing in the computer account after migration. Could this cause the problem or do I search at the wrong place? Thanks in advance for your support! it's easy enough to fix with the pdbedit command, set those values and then try to log in. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] how to migrate to samba-ldap transparently?
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Craig White wrote: of course you can change the SID on the PDC but that isn't gonna work for the computers that are already joined to the domain that still have the old SID ok, my thinking is if e.g. I would need to upgrade my Linux RH 9.0/samba 3.0.5-2 to e.g. FC4/samba 3.0.20, to avoid rejoin every windows client to the new domain, it would be enough to change the new PDC SID to the old one. So in that ideal scenario it would be transparent. samba documentation has information about migrating user profiles in the excellent How-To. Microsoft has lots of documentation about migrating user profiles. There is likely to be some 3rd party utilities to do that as well. I have no experience with them. thank you, I already was reading, I'm gonna try. to the other, see the samba documentation for a comprehensive discussion on migrating user profiles. I see, thanks. not everyone knows about the other mail lists for ldap and those lists aren't openldap specific. I'm not going to get involved with your frustration with openldap and the consultant you brought in to help you with it. My feeling is that if you are going to commit to using LDAP, you really need to understand it before you marry it to your everyday functionality because you aren't going to be able to fix it when it breaks until you understand it. Actually I'm not frustrated. The person who is helping us with ldap and samba is doing his best, only complaining with my refused 'off topic' emails, but perhaps you are right. I know that ldap is a good think, specially to make possible to have a good PDC/BDCs implementation, but here the situation is a little difficult e.g. is hard to find courses for learning/training on ldap, even on samba, so what we have managed to deploy in our institution is based on the basic functionality of free software, for our own, trying to learn first how it works or trying to have a plan B to use when a system fails when is possible. I appreciate very much your words and advices, Pablo Chamorro C. Craig -- Tel: +57 (2) 7314752/3222/2595 - Fax: +57 (2) 7310514 Carrera 31 #18-07 Parque Infantil - PO Box 1795 - Pasto -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] net rpc vampire - cannot login to migrated computer accounts
Christoph Peus wrote: after net rpc vampire migration: uidNumber: 22693 sambaSID: S-1-5-21-1139895982-289624505-398547282-4370 after the maschine rejoined the domain: uidNumber: 22694 sambaSID: S-1-5-21-1139895982-289624505-398547282-46388 Hi Christoph, nice to read you :) What shows testparm -sv 2/dev/null | grep 'algorithmic rid' ? Think it will look like 'algorithmic rid base = 1000' because 22694 * 2 + 1000 = 46388 You have to find the point in the migration process, where the new sambaSID is calculated. Your migrated sambaSID is not correct. Example from my machine (no ldap): # testparm -sv 2/dev/null | grep 'algorithmic rid' algorithmic rid base = 1000 vmeis # id xp\$ uid=2005(xp$) gid=777(machines) Gruppen=777(machines) vmeis # pdbedit -Lv xp$ | grep 'User SID' User SID: S-1-5-21-2616608439-745089445-1077948534-5010 2005 * 2 + 1000 = 5010 der tom -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] groupmap
On Saturday 12 November 2005 06:28, Simon Faulkner wrote: Why would I have some NT domains more than once? Did I screp up my import with the Vampire? Should I delete the unmapped ones (Gulp!) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# net groupmap list System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) - -1 Replicator (S-1-5-32-552) - Replicator Guests (S-1-5-32-546) - Guests Recipe (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-1016) - recipe Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1065375514-2370838480-4047619883-513) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-217354674-1388124147-264849902-513) - -1 Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-217354674-1388124147-264849902-514) - -1 Power Users (S-1-5-32-547) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-2542624836-2007811437-2422883089-513) - -1 Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1065375514-2370838480-4047619883-512) - -1 Print Operators (S-1-5-32-550) - -1 Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) - Administrators Sage (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-1005) - Sage Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-512) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-513) - users Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-514) - -1 Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-512) - root Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1065375514-2370838480-4047619883-514) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-513) - -1 Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-514) - nobody Account Operators (S-1-5-32-548) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-2968525064-3424225456-755833301-513) - -1 Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-2968525064-3424225456-755833301-512) - -1 Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-2968525064-3424225456-755833301-514) - -1 Backup Operators (S-1-5-32-551) - -1 Users (S-1-5-32-545) - Users Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-2542624836-2007811437-2422883089-512) - -1 Accounts Dept (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-2003) - acctsdep Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-217354674-1388124147-264849902-512) - -1 Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-2542624836-2007811437-2422883089-514) - -1 Financial Services (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-2005) - finsrvcs Sales (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-1030) - sales You have started Samba, then changed the server or workgroup name, then restarted Samba, and possibly then tried to do the net rpc vampire process. As a result your mappings are contaminated. You can clean this up by executing: net groupmap cleanup - John T. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Path issues in share name
I'm trying to setup samba 3 on FC4 to act a PDC and file server. I created the smb.conf file like I always have in the past but I keep getting this error. /home/samba/netlogon' does not exist or is not a directory, when connecting to [netlogon] with relevant section from smb.conf [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/samba/netlogon guest ok = yes writable = no share modes = no and for sanity sake [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# ls -l total 16 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 19 2002 netlogon drwxrwxr-x 6 root root 4096 Aug 30 2004 profiles [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# pwd /home/samba Any help possible is appreciated... -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Help with error message: Can't become connected user
I cannot even start troubleshooting until I buy a clue. What does Can't become connected user mean? It shows up fairly often. Aside from happening when I try to access a share, there's no pattern that I can see. -- 6 11:34:40 badlands smbd[20524]: [2005/11/06 11:34:40, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(577) Nov 6 11:34:40 badlands smbd[20524]: Can't become connected user! -- Just point me to what the message actually means and I'll go from there. Thanks! Mike- -- Mornings: Evolution in action. Only the grumpy will survive. -- Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have installed site-wide spam filters at catherders.com. If email from you bounces, try non-HTML, non-encoded, non-attachments. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Path issues in share name
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Barry Johnson wrote: | I'm trying to setup samba 3 on FC4 to act a PDC and file server. I | created the smb.conf file like I always have in the past but I keep | getting this error. | | /home/samba/netlogon' does not exist or is not a directory, when | connecting to [netlogon] | | with relevant section from smb.conf [netlogon] |comment = Network Logon Service |path = /home/samba/netlogon |guest ok = yes |writable = no |share modes = no | | and for sanity sake | [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# ls -l | total 16 | drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 19 2002 netlogon | drwxrwxr-x 6 root root 4096 Aug 30 2004 profiles | [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# pwd | /home/samba Barry, Check permissions on /home/samba cheers, jerry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDdhwVIR7qMdg1EfYRAs3oAJ9pb7Ie8tS2jOlXUBHWXQDxAC7/8gCeP+0C EtfLNMLC7DKsA6+d6WTVHLI= =P6jU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Path issues in share name
I did check the permissions of the directory and everything looks good. [EMAIL PROTECTED] home]# ls -l total 413528 drwxr-xr-x 2 baj baj 4096 Nov 12 10:35 baj drwxrwxrwx 4 root root 4096 Nov 12 11:35 samba It also isn't mounting my home dir on the windows xp machine, same error as before with the obvious changes in the error message, and those permissions look good too. I'll mention that I didn't make any changes to the home dir section of the config file. I did a ps of the smb process and it still looks like it runs as root, does it spawn children that run as some other user that could be causing this problem??? On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 10:45 -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Barry Johnson wrote: | I'm trying to setup samba 3 on FC4 to act a PDC and file server. I | created the smb.conf file like I always have in the past but I keep | getting this error. | | /home/samba/netlogon' does not exist or is not a directory, when | connecting to [netlogon] | | with relevant section from smb.conf [netlogon] |comment = Network Logon Service |path = /home/samba/netlogon |guest ok = yes |writable = no |share modes = no | | and for sanity sake | [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# ls -l | total 16 | drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 19 2002 netlogon | drwxrwxr-x 6 root root 4096 Aug 30 2004 profiles | [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# pwd | /home/samba Barry, Check permissions on /home/samba cheers, jerry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDdhwVIR7qMdg1EfYRAs3oAJ9pb7Ie8tS2jOlXUBHWXQDxAC7/8gCeP+0C EtfLNMLC7DKsA6+d6WTVHLI= =P6jU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Slow Access Database on Samba
I've applied all the optimizations you mention in that URL in my own smb.conf but my problem persists. The first user of the database opens it very fast, but the next users that try to open it, do it very slowly. Do you know what option (locking option?) might cause this behaviour? I've also tried 'strict locking = no' with no success. Thanks for your help, santiago. On 11/11/05, Gerald Drouillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave Williams wrote: Dear All, We have an access database running on a Samba share (Samba version 3.0.10-1.4E) with a gigabit connection to the network. The front end of the databases are on the client machines with linked tables stored in a separate mdb file on the linux server. For some reason the database runs very slowly when it is set up in this way. I tested copying a 10 MB file onto the samba share and it was instant which leads me to believe that this is not a networking issue but tweak needed to the smb.conf file. I have also run the database with the back end stored on a Windows Peer in the network - it runs much faster than on the linux setup. Here is the current Global setting in smb.conf. I would be very grateful if anyone can help; [global] workgroup = ACE server string = Ace New Server passdb backend = tdbsam username map = /etc/samba/smbusers wins support = Yes local master = yes preferred master = yes wins support = yes socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=4096 SO_RCVBUF=4096 oplocks = no Dave Williams Have a look at: http://drouillard.ca/TipsTricks/Samba/Oplocks.htm -- Regards -- Gerald Drouillard Technology Architect Drouillard Associates, Inc. http://www.Drouillard.ca -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba/LDAP-Backend stability on Debian Sarge
Hi, First, excuse me if this post is a bit offtopic, maybe this should be posted in the debian-users maillist, but I just wanted to read your experiences with this kind of setup, since I've migrated the server to Debian Sarge using LDAP Backend to serve clients using WinXP and Win98, and I've got this serious problems: - Samba segfaults [1] - slapd process crashes very often, almost once per day (i had to create a cron job to restart it periodically). - Slow MS Access database access [2] (I'm still trying to figure this one, maybe is a change of default in some samba option). Any of you is running a setup like this and having similar problems? Any Idea on how I could solve any of this? Thanks, santiago. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=314461 [2] http://rubyurl.com/9Dz -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Automatically Join Domain after Reboot
FC4 Samba 3 joining Windows 2003 Domain. I have to manually join the Domain after rebooting. If I set samba to start when booting it doesn't join the domain. I have to smb stop, net join ..., smb start from the command line and then it will join the domain and work fine. Is there something in the smb.conf that I can set to join the domain when smb starts? Thanks, Tommy -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] LDAP integration
We're into our new server build. We have built Samba / LDAP servers before, but never a PDC. I'm not sure that this question is PDC-specific though. What is the difference between smbldap-useradd, and adding a user to the LDAP database normally e.g. with cpu useradd? Are smbldap-tools needed for new installs, or only where an existing Samba database is being migrated to LDAP? What is the best practise for the administrator for new installs? We plan to join machines to the domain as root. Is this overly dangerous? Do we need to create an admin user and group to join machines? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] groupmap
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 15:48 +, Simon Faulkner wrote: Craig White wrote: On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 13:28 +, Simon Faulkner wrote: Why would I have some NT domains more than once? Did I screp up my import with the Vampire? Should I delete the unmapped ones (Gulp!) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# net groupmap list System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) - -1 Replicator (S-1-5-32-552) - Replicator Guests (S-1-5-32-546) - Guests Recipe (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-1016) - recipe Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1065375514-2370838480-4047619883-513) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-217354674-1388124147-264849902-513) - -1 Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-217354674-1388124147-264849902-514) - -1 Power Users (S-1-5-32-547) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-2542624836-2007811437-2422883089-513) - -1 Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1065375514-2370838480-4047619883-512) - -1 Print Operators (S-1-5-32-550) - -1 Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) - Administrators Sage (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-1005) - Sage Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-512) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-513) - users Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-514) - -1 Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-512) - root Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1065375514-2370838480-4047619883-514) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-513) - -1 Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-514) - nobody Account Operators (S-1-5-32-548) - -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-2968525064-3424225456-755833301-513) - -1 Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-2968525064-3424225456-755833301-512) - -1 Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-2968525064-3424225456-755833301-514) - -1 Backup Operators (S-1-5-32-551) - -1 Users (S-1-5-32-545) - Users Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-2542624836-2007811437-2422883089-512) - -1 Accounts Dept (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-2003) - acctsdep Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-217354674-1388124147-264849902-512) - -1 Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-2542624836-2007811437-2422883089-514) - -1 Financial Services (S-1-5-21-2196479170-443629602-2075717434-2005) - finsrvcs Sales (S-1-5-21-1019967034-149178136-1846952604-1030) - sales - They are all different SID's There's only 1 of them that matters. The SID of your domain, the rest are pretty much meaningless. It looks like you didn't follow the vampire instructions closely enough. How about the users, what's their SID's look like? # net getlocalsid # pdbedit -Lv|grep SID # net groupmap list The SID's should all the same...with the exception of the RID extensions on the specific objects. When you vampire, you must get the SID from the NT4 PDC, and then set the samba box to the exact same SID, then vampire, then the users, groups, machine accounts, etc. all have the same base SID Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# net getlocalsid [2005/11/12 15:48:20, 0] utils/net.c:net_getlocalsid(494) Can't fetch domain SID for name: OXIDEPDC I guess I am in trouble? Let's keep this on the list so you can benefit from other perhaps more knowledgeable or more insightful and perhaps they can benefit from the resolution of your situation. it does appear that there is a problem with your setup. At this point you should try a tdbdump of your tdb passdb to see what it looks like and if it is garbage, delete it and start all over. If it looks good, you can net setlocalsid and it should take but the results of the other commands I listed above I can tell you this much...I have never been satisfied with my first pass ever on a vampire from an NT4 server. Generally, I have to fix stuff up with my LDAP setup or smbldap-tools to get it exactly right. I never use tdb passdb so I can't tell you the exact procedures but with ldap passdb, I always slapcat the ldap db prior to doing the net rpc vampire, check out the results in ldap, wipe it all out, restore from the slapcat that I did previously, fix the things that aren't perfect and do it again. It takes a few passes. The first time I ever migrated an NT4 PDC to samba PDC, it probably took about 30 passes - but I tried to be meticulous. Now, it probably takes me from 2-4 passes but I am getting quite good at setting up ldap. Good luck Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] LDAP user
This follows on from the previous questions. I noticed that smbldap-tools With lines like ldap user suffix = ou=Users in smb.conf, should we change Users to People if that's how our LDAP database was set up, or do Users and People generally mean different things in LDAP? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba/LDAP-Backend stability on Debian Sarge
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 12:35 -0500, Jorge Santiago wrote: Hi, First, excuse me if this post is a bit offtopic, maybe this should be posted in the debian-users maillist, but I just wanted to read your experiences with this kind of setup, since I've migrated the server to Debian Sarge using LDAP Backend to serve clients using WinXP and Win98, and I've got this serious problems: - Samba segfaults [1] - slapd process crashes very often, almost once per day (i had to create a cron job to restart it periodically). - Slow MS Access database access [2] (I'm still trying to figure this one, maybe is a change of default in some samba option). Any of you is running a setup like this and having similar problems? Any Idea on how I could solve any of this? Thanks, santiago. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=314461 [2] http://rubyurl.com/9Dz seems as though you have to fix samba segfaulting issue and slapd issue first before you can think about fixing slow Access issue. samba is very stable daemon when properly installed configured openldap is very stable daemon when properly installed configured I haven't a clue on where you might have deviated in installation/configuration processes on either samba or openldap that might be causing your issues and you might want to use debian resources to help you troubleshoot them. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] LDAP user
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 18:56 +, Antony Gelberg wrote: This follows on from the previous questions. I noticed that smbldap-tools With lines like ldap user suffix = ou=Users in smb.conf, should we change Users to People if that's how our LDAP database was set up, or do Users and People generally mean different things in LDAP? simple question, simple answer...yes, change it. complicated answer...it's your DSA and you set it up however you want it to be set up. It seems logical to me to have the same LDAP account have both posix and samba attributes and that is what I would do. Organizational Units in LDAP (ou) are only containers and don't mean anything to LDAP other than the fact that they are containers for things like DN's and whether they are named People or Users is entirely at the administrator's discretion and of little consequence when properly configured. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3.0.21rc1 Available for Download
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 == I'm a great big boot in a world of toes. -- David Mullen == Release Announcements = This is a release candidate of the 3.0.21 code base and is provided for testing purposes only. While close to the final stable release, this snapshot is *not* intended for production servers. Common bugs fixed in 3.0.21rc1 include: ~ o Portability and crash bugs. ~ o Performance issues in winbindd. New features introduced in Samba 3.0.21rc1 include: ~ o Performance Counter external daemon. ~ o Winbindd auto-detection query methods when communicating ~with a domain controller. Download Details The uncompressed tarballs and patch files have been signed using GnuPG (ID 157BC95E). The source code can be downloaded from: http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/rc/ The release notes (WHATSNEW-3-0-21rc1.txt) are available in the same download directory as the source distribution. Binary packages are available at http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/ Our Code, Our Bugs, Our Responsibility. (https://bugzilla.samba.org/) --Enjoy The Samba Team -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDdRGYIR7qMdg1EfYRAkcKAJ9GydRYB7BKXdgwdPm9SP91vK5B0ACeLdnn LLmgD/PxnCmYKhs9rPqCNFk= =eULr -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Have to love MS, Was: - Re: w32time and Samba PDC Domains
On Nov 10, 2005, at 4:58 AM, Michael Lueck wrote: Michael Lueck wrote: So close to working that this is annoying. Upon looking into the Windows DHCP client, one can request specific DHCP options be mapped to specific places in the registry, so I cooked up the following: REGEDIT4 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Dhcp \Parameters\Options\4] RegLocation=SYSTEM\\CurrentControlSet\ \Services\\W32Time\\Parameters\\NtpServer KeyType=dword:0001 I ended up doing RegMon through a DHCP release/renew... nadda. RegMon through an IPL of the computer... nadda! It would appear to me that this above functionality has been disabled in Win2K SP4, or who knows... The Options area under DHCP\Parameters never got touched - my added key or any of the existing ones. Might just as well come up with another solution then. Just thought I would update on where this path ended. -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ Remove the upper case letters NOSPAM to contact me directly. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba There is a security policy setting you must change. You want to give Authenticated Users the right to adjust the time. Sorry I don't have a windows PC before me at the moment, so I can't point you to the exact item --control panel/administrative tools/security settings-- or something like it. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Automounting Windows XP share on Linux
I have /etc/auto.master and /etc/auto.smb such that ls /smb/name of system works for the two Win98 machines on my network (the machines get automatically mounted and the directory contains C). When I try the same command on the Windows XP machine, I get No such file or directory The auto.smb file that came with my OS (Libranet 3) uses smbclient to get a list of resources on the target. With the Win98 machine, the output of smbclient -gNL Win98machine is Disk|C|C on Win98machine IPC|IPC$|Remote Inter Process Communication But, smbclient -gNL WindowsXPmachine produces IPC|IPC$|Remote IPC Disk|print$|Printer Drivers Disk|C on WindowsXPmachine| Disk|ADMIN$|Remote Admin Disk|C$|Default share auto.smb makes a command option string from this output using awk by looking for lines that start with Disk and then using the token that follows the |. In the case of the Win98 machines, it gets C, which is what gets mounted. But most, if not all, of the Disk lines from the XP machine are bogus. Certainly print$ is not a mountable drive. Nor is ADMIN$. C on WindowsXPmachine is a comment, not the name of a drive. That leaves C$. I don't know what effect the $ has, but otherwise this entry is correct. Does anyone know why I am getting the other entries? Is there anything I can do to Windows XP to suppress these bogus responses? If anyone else has a Windows XP server, do you get the same stuff back from smbclient? -- Jeffrey Barish -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Automounting Windows XP share on Linux
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 15:49 -0700, Jeffrey Barish wrote: I have /etc/auto.master and /etc/auto.smb such that ls /smb/name of system works for the two Win98 machines on my network (the machines get automatically mounted and the directory contains C). When I try the same command on the Windows XP machine, I get No such file or directory The auto.smb file that came with my OS (Libranet 3) uses smbclient to get a list of resources on the target. With the Win98 machine, the output of smbclient -gNL Win98machine is Disk|C|C on Win98machine IPC|IPC$|Remote Inter Process Communication But, smbclient -gNL WindowsXPmachine produces IPC|IPC$|Remote IPC Disk|print$|Printer Drivers Disk|C on WindowsXPmachine| Disk|ADMIN$|Remote Admin Disk|C$|Default share auto.smb makes a command option string from this output using awk by looking for lines that start with Disk and then using the token that follows the |. In the case of the Win98 machines, it gets C, which is what gets mounted. But most, if not all, of the Disk lines from the XP machine are bogus. Certainly print$ is not a mountable drive. Nor is ADMIN$. C on WindowsXPmachine is a comment, not the name of a drive. That leaves C$. I don't know what effect the $ has, but otherwise this entry is correct. Does anyone know why I am getting the other entries? Is there anything I can do to Windows XP to suppress these bogus responses? If anyone else has a Windows XP server, do you get the same stuff back from smbclient? a little bit google searching or a little bit of study of Windows Networking would tell you what these shares are and yes, everyone would get those shares. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Can't connect to smb share that's a mounted file system
Howdy y'all, I have a new partition, /dev/hdc1 that's ext3 formatted. # mkfs.ext3 -L /backup /dev/hdc1 Then added it to /etc/fstab LABEL=/backup /backup ext3defaults1 2 As you can see I'm mounting the file system into directory /backup My smb.conf file has the following settings: security = share [netfiles] comment = Network file storage space path = /backup read only = no public = yes Now, before mounting /dev/hdc1, I can connect to the share from my XP system using: \\smbmachine\netfiles Then, I mount the file system to /backup: mount /dev/hdc1 and try to connect: \\smbmachine\netfiles This time XP either prompts me for a GUEST password, or I get an error \\smbmachine\netfiles is not accessible. Here's the permissions: /backup directory before mounting /dev/hdc1 into it: drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 12 17:27 /backup Now, I mount /dev/hdc1 to /backup and here's the permissions drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Nov 12 17:31 /backup Any idea why I can browse into the netfiles share from my XP machine when /backup is just a directory, but not after mounting /dev/hdc1 to it? Thanks for any help, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Can't connect to smb share that's a mounted file system
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 17:33 -0600, Mike Hanby wrote: Howdy y'all, I have a new partition, /dev/hdc1 that's ext3 formatted. # mkfs.ext3 -L /backup /dev/hdc1 Then added it to /etc/fstab LABEL=/backup /backup ext3defaults1 2 As you can see I'm mounting the file system into directory /backup My smb.conf file has the following settings: security = share [netfiles] comment = Network file storage space path = /backup read only = no public = yes Now, before mounting /dev/hdc1, I can connect to the share from my XP system using: \\smbmachine\netfiles Then, I mount the file system to /backup: mount /dev/hdc1 and try to connect: \\smbmachine\netfiles This time XP either prompts me for a GUEST password, or I get an error \\smbmachine\netfiles is not accessible. Here's the permissions: /backup directory before mounting /dev/hdc1 into it: drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 12 17:27 /backup Now, I mount /dev/hdc1 to /backup and here's the permissions drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Nov 12 17:31 /backup Any idea why I can browse into the netfiles share from my XP machine when /backup is just a directory, but not after mounting /dev/hdc1 to it? Thanks for any help, Mike check the [netfiles] 'path' property \path is Windows pathing /path is UNIX/Linux pathing samba is reading a UNIX/Linux path and so it is wrong... try 'testparm -s -v |less' to check for errors. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Can't connect to smb share that's a mounted file system
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 16:42 -0700, Craig White wrote: On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 17:33 -0600, Mike Hanby wrote: Howdy y'all, I have a new partition, /dev/hdc1 that's ext3 formatted. # mkfs.ext3 -L /backup /dev/hdc1 Then added it to /etc/fstab LABEL=/backup /backup ext3defaults1 2 As you can see I'm mounting the file system into directory /backup My smb.conf file has the following settings: security = share [netfiles] comment = Network file storage space path = /backup read only = no public = yes Now, before mounting /dev/hdc1, I can connect to the share from my XP system using: \\smbmachine\netfiles Then, I mount the file system to /backup: mount /dev/hdc1 and try to connect: \\smbmachine\netfiles This time XP either prompts me for a GUEST password, or I get an error \\smbmachine\netfiles is not accessible. Here's the permissions: /backup directory before mounting /dev/hdc1 into it: drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 12 17:27 /backup Now, I mount /dev/hdc1 to /backup and here's the permissions drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Nov 12 17:31 /backup Any idea why I can browse into the netfiles share from my XP machine when /backup is just a directory, but not after mounting /dev/hdc1 to it? Thanks for any help, Mike check the [netfiles] 'path' property \path is Windows pathing /path is UNIX/Linux pathing samba is reading a UNIX/Linux path and so it is wrong... try 'testparm -s -v |less' to check for errors. also, I should have mentioned, you probably also would want something like in [general] guest account = SOME_ACCOUNT and possibly 'guest only' in [netfiles] see security = SHARE in 'man smb.conf' Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Automounting Windows XP share on Linux
Craig White wrote: On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 15:49 -0700, Jeffrey Barish wrote: I have /etc/auto.master and /etc/auto.smb such that ls /smb/name of system works for the two Win98 machines on my network (the machines get automatically mounted and the directory contains C). When I try the same command on the Windows XP machine, I get No such file or directory The auto.smb file that came with my OS (Libranet 3) uses smbclient to get a list of resources on the target. With the Win98 machine, the output of smbclient -gNL Win98machine is Disk|C|C on Win98machine IPC|IPC$|Remote Inter Process Communication But, smbclient -gNL WindowsXPmachine produces IPC|IPC$|Remote IPC Disk|print$|Printer Drivers Disk|C on WindowsXPmachine| Disk|ADMIN$|Remote Admin Disk|C$|Default share auto.smb makes a command option string from this output using awk by looking for lines that start with Disk and then using the token that follows the |. In the case of the Win98 machines, it gets C, which is what gets mounted. But most, if not all, of the Disk lines from the XP machine are bogus. Certainly print$ is not a mountable drive. Nor is ADMIN$. C on WindowsXPmachine is a comment, not the name of a drive. That leaves C$. I don't know what effect the $ has, but otherwise this entry is correct. Does anyone know why I am getting the other entries? Is there anything I can do to Windows XP to suppress these bogus responses? If anyone else has a Windows XP server, do you get the same stuff back from smbclient? a little bit google searching or a little bit of study of Windows Networking would tell you what these shares are and yes, everyone would get those shares. Craig If everyone gets those shares, then how does everyone get auto.smb to work? Do they replace the standard auto.smb with one that filters out entries for things that are listed as disks but are not? And does everyone get these bogus disk shares only from Windows XP, not other Windows OSs? -- Jeffrey Barish -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Automounting Windows XP share on Linux
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 16:57 -0700, Jeffrey Barish wrote: Craig White wrote: If everyone gets those shares, then how does everyone get auto.smb to work? Do they replace the standard auto.smb with one that filters out entries for things that are listed as disks but are not? And does everyone get these bogus disk shares only from Windows XP, not other Windows OSs? I've never used auto.smb or auto.fs and I'm somewhat curious about it myself but those aren't bogus shares...that was my point. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Can't connect to smb share that's a mounted file system
Howdy, the path statement in the smb.conf file is using Unix pathing. path = /backup I tried adding the guest only = yes to the [netfiles] section and it didn't change anything. Here's my [netfiles] section again: [netfiles] comment = Network file storage space path = /backup read only = no guest only = yes public = yes Basically, what it's boiling down to is, I can create smb shares on my main drive, /dev/hda1, and access them fine from my XP system. It's only when I try to access a share that points to a mount on my alternate hard drive /dev/hdc1 is when I get the password prompts / error messages. I'm thinking it's a file system permissions problem, but looking at the permissions I don't see a difference between ones that work and those that don't :-( -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig White Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 17:57 To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Can't connect to smb share that's a mounted file system On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 16:42 -0700, Craig White wrote: On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 17:33 -0600, Mike Hanby wrote: Howdy y'all, I have a new partition, /dev/hdc1 that's ext3 formatted. # mkfs.ext3 -L /backup /dev/hdc1 Then added it to /etc/fstab LABEL=/backup /backup ext3defaults 1 2 As you can see I'm mounting the file system into directory /backup My smb.conf file has the following settings: security = share [netfiles] comment = Network file storage space path = /backup read only = no public = yes Now, before mounting /dev/hdc1, I can connect to the share from my XP system using: \\smbmachine\netfiles Then, I mount the file system to /backup: mount /dev/hdc1 and try to connect: \\smbmachine\netfiles This time XP either prompts me for a GUEST password, or I get an error \\smbmachine\netfiles is not accessible. Here's the permissions: /backup directory before mounting /dev/hdc1 into it: drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 12 17:27 /backup Now, I mount /dev/hdc1 to /backup and here's the permissions drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Nov 12 17:31 /backup Any idea why I can browse into the netfiles share from my XP machine when /backup is just a directory, but not after mounting /dev/hdc1 to it? Thanks for any help, Mike check the [netfiles] 'path' property \path is Windows pathing /path is UNIX/Linux pathing samba is reading a UNIX/Linux path and so it is wrong... try 'testparm -s -v |less' to check for errors. also, I should have mentioned, you probably also would want something like in [general] guest account = SOME_ACCOUNT and possibly 'guest only' in [netfiles] see security = SHARE in 'man smb.conf' Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Can't connect to smb share that's a mounted file system
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 20:44 -0600, Mike Hanby wrote: Howdy, the path statement in the smb.conf file is using Unix pathing. path = /backup I tried adding the guest only = yes to the [netfiles] section and it didn't change anything. Here's my [netfiles] section again: [netfiles] comment = Network file storage space path = /backup read only = no guest only = yes public = yes Basically, what it's boiling down to is, I can create smb shares on my main drive, /dev/hda1, and access them fine from my XP system. It's only when I try to access a share that points to a mount on my alternate hard drive /dev/hdc1 is when I get the password prompts / error messages. I'm thinking it's a file system permissions problem, but looking at the permissions I don't see a difference between ones that work and those that don't :-( Ok well you're not sharing some of that information so I can only speculate but is /dev/hdc1 ... is that ext2/ext3 ? running the command 'mount' would give that info. I'm wondering if it's some NTFS or vfat mounted as a user that wouldn't have permissions. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbclient not accessable on debian
I am a newbie to linux. I'm trying to learn everything at once. I chose debian as my weapon of self destruction. Recently I installed the debian version of Samba 3.0.20 for x86. It seems to be up and running. I can see it from my windows xp and win 98 machines which are on the same LAN, and when I run testparm I get no error messages. The only thing is when I try to run smbclient -L myhost I get smbclient: command not found. Not only that when I type man smbclient I get no manual entry for smbclient. smbclient is listed in the man page for Samba, but that just gives a brief description. Is this a bug in the program? Is it something that could be solved in smb.conf? Is it a Debian idiosyncrasy? What questions should I be asking? Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Can't connect to smb share that's a mounted file system
It's ext3 (In the original post I included the make file system command): # mkfs.ext3 -L /backup /dev/hdc1 If I do an ls -ld /backup before mounting and after mounting, the permissions look the same to me, obviously I'm missing something but I can't find it! -Original Message- From: Craig White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 20:56 To: Mike Hanby Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: [Samba] Can't connect to smb share that's a mounted file system On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 20:44 -0600, Mike Hanby wrote: Howdy, the path statement in the smb.conf file is using Unix pathing. path = /backup I tried adding the guest only = yes to the [netfiles] section and it didn't change anything. Here's my [netfiles] section again: [netfiles] comment = Network file storage space path = /backup read only = no guest only = yes public = yes Basically, what it's boiling down to is, I can create smb shares on my main drive, /dev/hda1, and access them fine from my XP system. It's only when I try to access a share that points to a mount on my alternate hard drive /dev/hdc1 is when I get the password prompts / error messages. I'm thinking it's a file system permissions problem, but looking at the permissions I don't see a difference between ones that work and those that don't :-( Ok well you're not sharing some of that information so I can only speculate but is /dev/hdc1 ... is that ext2/ext3 ? running the command 'mount' would give that info. I'm wondering if it's some NTFS or vfat mounted as a user that wouldn't have permissions. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: smbclient not accessable on debian
Couple of corrections to my previous post. 1. My Samba version is 3.0.14a-Debian not 3.0.20 2. It's on i386 not x86, whatever that is. Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] groupmap
it does appear that there is a problem with your setup. At this point you should try a tdbdump of your tdb passdb to see what it looks like and if it is garbage, delete it and start all over. If it looks good, you can net setlocalsid and it should take but the results of the other commands I listed above I can tell you this much...I have never been satisfied with my first pass ever on a vampire from an NT4 server. Generally, I have to fix stuff up with my LDAP setup or smbldap-tools to get it exactly right. I never use tdb passdb so I can't tell you the exact procedures but with ldap passdb, I always slapcat the ldap db prior to doing the net rpc vampire, check out the results in ldap, wipe it all out, restore from the slapcat that I did previously, fix the things that aren't perfect and do it again. It takes a few passes. The first time I ever migrated an NT4 PDC to samba PDC, it probably took about 30 passes - but I tried to be meticulous. Now, it probably takes me from 2-4 passes but I am getting quite good at setting up ldap. Cheers Craig, LDAP is next on my Agenda... I'm just trying to get a grip of net groupmap - I think that holds the answer -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] (no subject)
set delivery off -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
svn commit: samba r11698 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/smb2: .
Author: tridge Date: 2005-11-12 08:18:52 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005) New Revision: 11698 WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=11698 Log: added some more level names Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/smb2/smb2_calls.h Changeset: Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/smb2/smb2_calls.h === --- branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/smb2/smb2_calls.h 2005-11-12 07:48:56 UTC (rev 11697) +++ branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/smb2/smb2_calls.h 2005-11-12 08:18:52 UTC (rev 11698) @@ -169,17 +169,18 @@ /* file information levels */ #define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_BASIC_INFO0x0401 -#define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_050x0501 +#define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_SIZE_INFO 0x0501 #define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_060x0601 -#define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_070x0701 +#define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_EA_SIZE 0x0701 #define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_ACCESS_INFO 0x0801 #define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_0E0x0e01 +#define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_EA_INFO 0x0f01 #define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_100x1001 #define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_110x1101 #define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_ALL_INFO 0x1201 #define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_NAME_INFO 0x1501 #define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_STREAM_INFO 0x1601 -#define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_1C0x1c01 +#define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_EOF_INFO 0x1c01 #define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_STANDARD_INFO 0x2201 #define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_ATTRIB_INFO 0x2301
svn commit: samba r11699 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/torture/smb2: .
Author: tridge
Date: 2005-11-12 08:19:39 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005)
New Revision: 11699
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=11699
Log:
use create_complex_file() to setup a file with a wide range of
different attributes before running the getinfo level scanner, making
it easier to recognise levels
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/torture/smb2/scan.c
Changeset:
Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/torture/smb2/scan.c
===
--- branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/torture/smb2/scan.c 2005-11-12 08:18:52 UTC
(rev 11698)
+++ branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/torture/smb2/scan.c 2005-11-12 08:19:39 UTC
(rev 11699)
@@ -28,6 +28,31 @@
#include lib/events/events.h
+/*
+ create a complex file using the old SMB protocol, to make it easier to
+ find fields in SMB2 getinfo levels
+*/
+static BOOL setup_complex_file(const char *fname)
+{
+ struct smbcli_state *cli;
+ int fnum;
+
+ if (!torture_open_connection(cli)) {
+ return False;
+ }
+
+ fnum = create_complex_file(cli, cli, fname);
+
+ if (DEBUGLVL(1)) {
+ torture_all_info(cli-tree, fname);
+ }
+
+ talloc_free(cli);
+ return fnum != -1;
+}
+
+
+
/*
scan for valid SMB2 getinfo levels
*/
@@ -52,6 +77,10 @@
return False;
}
+ if (!setup_complex_file(fname)) {
+ printf(Failed to setup complex file '%s'\n, fname);
+ }
+
ZERO_STRUCT(cr);
cr.in.buffer_code = 0x39;
cr.in.oplock_flags = 0;
svn commit: samba r11700 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/smb2: .
Author: tridge
Date: 2005-11-12 08:39:36 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005)
New Revision: 11700
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=11700
Log:
added structure definitions for many of the getinfo structures
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/smb2/smb2_calls.h
Changeset:
Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/smb2/smb2_calls.h
===
--- branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/smb2/smb2_calls.h 2005-11-12 08:19:39 UTC
(rev 11699)
+++ branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libcli/smb2/smb2_calls.h 2005-11-12 08:39:36 UTC
(rev 11700)
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@
#define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_100x1001
#define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_110x1101
#define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_ALL_INFO 0x1201
-#define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_NAME_INFO 0x1501
+#define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_SHORT_INFO0x1501
#define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_STREAM_INFO 0x1601
#define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_EOF_INFO 0x1c01
#define SMB2_GETINFO_FILE_STANDARD_INFO 0x2201
@@ -203,3 +203,102 @@
} out;
};
+union smb2_fileinfo {
+ struct {
+ NTTIME create_time;
+ NTTIME access_time;
+ NTTIME write_time;
+ NTTIME change_time;
+ uint32_t file_attr;
+ uint32_t unknown;
+ } basic_info;
+
+ struct {
+ uint64_t alloc_size;
+ uint64_t size;
+ uint32_t nlink;
+ uint32_t unknown;
+ } size_info;
+
+ struct {
+ uint32_t unknown1;
+ uint32_t unknown2;
+ } unknown06;
+
+ struct {
+ uint32_t ea_size;
+ } ea_info;
+
+ struct {
+ uint32_t access_mask;
+ } access_info;
+
+ struct {
+ uint32_t unknown1;
+ uint32_t unknown2;
+ } unknown0e;
+
+ struct {
+ struct smb_ea_list all_eas;
+ } all_ea_info;
+
+ struct {
+ uint32_t unknown; /* 2 */
+ } unknown10;
+
+ struct {
+ uint32_t unknown;
+ } unknown11;
+
+ struct {
+ NTTIME create_time;
+ NTTIME access_time;
+ NTTIME write_time;
+ NTTIME change_time;
+ uint32_t file_attr;
+ uint32_t unknown1;
+ uint64_t alloc_size;
+ uint64_t size;
+ uint32_t nlink;
+ uint32_t unknown2;
+ uint32_t unknown3;
+ uint32_t unknown4;
+ uint32_t ea_size;
+ uint32_t access_mask;
+ uint64_t unknown5;
+ uint64_t unknown6;
+ const char *fname;
+ } all_info;
+
+ struct {
+ const char *short_name;
+ } short_info;
+
+ struct {
+ uint32_t unknown;
+ uint64_t size;
+ uint64_t alloc_size;
+ const char *stream_name;
+ } stream_info;
+
+ struct {
+ uint64_t size;
+ uint64_t unknown;
+ } eof_info;
+
+ struct {
+ NTTIME create_time;
+ NTTIME access_time;
+ NTTIME write_time;
+ NTTIME change_time;
+ uint64_t alloc_size;
+ uint64_t size;
+ uint32_t file_attr;
+ uint32_t unknown;
+ } standard_info;
+
+ struct {
+ uint32_t file_attr;
+ uint32_t unknown;
+ } attrib_info;
+};
svn commit: samba-web r852 - in trunk: .
Author: jerry Date: 2005-11-12 16:26:57 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005) New Revision: 852 WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-webrev=852 Log: announcing 3.0.21rc1 Modified: trunk/index.html Changeset: Modified: trunk/index.html === --- trunk/index.html2005-11-11 16:45:32 UTC (rev 851) +++ trunk/index.html2005-11-12 16:26:57 UTC (rev 852) @@ -15,35 +15,31 @@ h2Current Release/h2 -h4a name=latest18 Oct 2005/a/h4 -p class=headlineSamba 3.0.21pre1 Available for Download/p +h4a name=latest12 Nov 2005/a/h4 +p class=headlineSamba 3.0.21rc1 Available for Download/p -pThis is a preview release of the Samba 3.0.21 code base and - is provided for testing only. This release is *not* intended - for production servers. There has been a substantial amount - of development since the 3.0.20 series of stable releases. - We would like to ask the Samba community for help in testing - these changes as we work towards the next significant production - upgrade Samba 3.0 release. Please read the specific changes in the +pThis is a release candidate of the 3.0.21 code base and is provided + for testing purposes only. While close to the final stable release, + this snapshot is emnot/em intended for production servers. Please read + the specific changes in the a href=/samba/ftp/pre/WHATSNEW-3-0-21pre1.txtRelease Notes/a./p -pThe a href=/samba/ftp/pre/samba-3.0.21pre1.tar.gzSamba 3.0.21pre1 +pThe a href=/samba/ftp/rc/samba-3.0.21rc1.tar.gzSamba 3.0.21rc1 source code/a can be downloaded now. The a - href=/samba/ftp/pre/samba-3.0.21pre1.tar.ascGnuPG + href=/samba/ftp/rc/samba-3.0.21rc1.tar.ascGnuPG signature for the emun/emcompressed tarball/a is also available. - If you prefer to download just the diff between 3.0.20b to 3.0.21pre1, the - a href=/samba/ftp/pre/patch-3.0.20b-3.0.21pre1.diffs.gzpatch file/a - (a href=/samba/ftp/pre/patch-3.0.20b-3.0.21pre1.diffs.ascgpg signature/a) is also available. + If you prefer to download just the diff between 3.0.21pre1 to 3.0.21rc1, the + a href=/samba/ftp/rc/patch-3.0.21pre1-3.0.21rc1.diffs.gzpatch file/a + (a href=/samba/ftp/rc/patch-3.0.21pre1-3.0.21rc1.diffs.ascgpg signature/a) is also available. Precompiled packages for Solaris and Fedora Core 4 are available in the - a href=/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/Binary_Packages - download area/a. Packages for other platforms will be available - shortly./p + a href=/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/Binary_Packages download area/a. + Packages for other platforms will be available shortly./p pSamba 3.0.21pre1 is also available via BitTorrent - (a href=http://torrent.samba.org/samba/ftp/pre/samba-3.0.21pre1.tar.gz.torrent;samba-3.0.21pre1.tar.gz.torrent/a). + (a href=http://torrent.samba.org/samba/ftp/pre/samba-3.0.21rc1.tar.gz.torrent;samba-3.0.21rc1.tar.gz.torrent/a). Note that when downloading via BitTorrent, you are encouraged to verify the resulting uncompressed tarball's - a href=/samba/ftp/pre/samba-3.0.21pre1.tar.ascGPG signature/a./p + a href=/samba/ftp/pre/samba-3.0.21rc1.tar.ascGPG signature/a./p h4a name=stable13 Oct 2005/a/h4 p class=headlineSamba 3.0.20b Available for Download/p
svn commit: samba-web r853 - in trunk: .
Author: jerry Date: 2005-11-12 16:28:54 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005) New Revision: 853 WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-webrev=853 Log: fixing typos and broken links Modified: trunk/index.html Changeset: Modified: trunk/index.html === --- trunk/index.html2005-11-12 16:26:57 UTC (rev 852) +++ trunk/index.html2005-11-12 16:28:54 UTC (rev 853) @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ for testing purposes only. While close to the final stable release, this snapshot is emnot/em intended for production servers. Please read the specific changes in the - a href=/samba/ftp/pre/WHATSNEW-3-0-21pre1.txtRelease Notes/a./p + a href=/samba/ftp/pre/WHATSNEW-3-0-21rc1.txtRelease Notes/a./p pThe a href=/samba/ftp/rc/samba-3.0.21rc1.tar.gzSamba 3.0.21rc1 source code/a can be downloaded now. The a @@ -36,10 +36,10 @@ Packages for other platforms will be available shortly./p pSamba 3.0.21pre1 is also available via BitTorrent - (a href=http://torrent.samba.org/samba/ftp/pre/samba-3.0.21rc1.tar.gz.torrent;samba-3.0.21rc1.tar.gz.torrent/a). + (a href=http://torrent.samba.org/samba/ftp/rc/samba-3.0.21rc1.tar.gz.torrent;samba-3.0.21rc1.tar.gz.torrent/a). Note that when downloading via BitTorrent, you are encouraged to verify the resulting uncompressed tarball's - a href=/samba/ftp/pre/samba-3.0.21rc1.tar.ascGPG signature/a./p + a href=/samba/ftp/rc/samba-3.0.21rc1.tar.ascGPG signature/a./p h4a name=stable13 Oct 2005/a/h4 p class=headlineSamba 3.0.20b Available for Download/p
svn commit: samba-web r854 - in trunk: .
Author: jerry Date: 2005-11-12 16:29:59 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005) New Revision: 854 WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-webrev=854 Log: doh!one more broken link Modified: trunk/index.html Changeset: Modified: trunk/index.html === --- trunk/index.html2005-11-12 16:28:54 UTC (rev 853) +++ trunk/index.html2005-11-12 16:29:59 UTC (rev 854) @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ for testing purposes only. While close to the final stable release, this snapshot is emnot/em intended for production servers. Please read the specific changes in the - a href=/samba/ftp/pre/WHATSNEW-3-0-21rc1.txtRelease Notes/a./p + a href=/samba/ftp/rc/WHATSNEW-3-0-21rc1.txtRelease Notes/a./p pThe a href=/samba/ftp/rc/samba-3.0.21rc1.tar.gzSamba 3.0.21rc1 source code/a can be downloaded now. The a
svn commit: samba r11701 - in tags: .
Author: jerry Date: 2005-11-12 16:53:14 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005) New Revision: 11701 WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=11701 Log: tagging 3.0.21rc1 Added: tags/re/ Changeset: Copied: tags/re (from rev 11700, branches/SAMBA_3_0_RELEASE)
svn commit: samba r11703 - in tags: .
Author: jerry Date: 2005-11-12 16:54:11 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005) New Revision: 11703 WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=11703 Log: bad tag (cut-n-paste error) Removed: tags/re/ Changeset:
svn commit: samba r11704 - branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/nsswitch trunk/source/nsswitch
Author: vlendec Date: 2005-11-12 18:22:12 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005) New Revision: 11704 WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=11704 Log: methods-alternate_name is not used anymore -- remove it Modified: branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/nsswitch/winbindd.h branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/nsswitch/winbindd_ads.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/nsswitch/winbindd_passdb.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/nsswitch/winbindd_reconnect.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/nsswitch/winbindd_rpc.c trunk/source/nsswitch/winbindd.h trunk/source/nsswitch/winbindd_ads.c trunk/source/nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c trunk/source/nsswitch/winbindd_passdb.c trunk/source/nsswitch/winbindd_reconnect.c trunk/source/nsswitch/winbindd_rpc.c Changeset: Sorry, the patch is too large (375 lines) to include; please use WebSVN to see it! WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=11704
svn commit: samba-web r855 - in trunk: . history news/releases
Author: deryck Date: 2005-11-12 20:45:13 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005) New Revision: 855 WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-webrev=855 Log: Add news item on 3.0.21rc1 release. Move older release announcements to history. Update release links and release note links. deryck Added: trunk/news/releases/3.0.21rc1.html Modified: trunk/history/header_history.html trunk/history/index.html trunk/index.html Changeset: Modified: trunk/history/header_history.html === --- trunk/history/header_history.html 2005-11-12 16:29:59 UTC (rev 854) +++ trunk/history/header_history.html 2005-11-12 20:45:13 UTC (rev 855) @@ -77,6 +77,9 @@ div class=notes h6Release Notes/h6 ul +lia href=samba-3.0.20b.htmlsamba-3.0.20b.html/a/li +lia href=samba-3.0.20a.htmlsamba-3.0.20a.html/a/li +lia href=samba-3.0.20.htmlsamba-3.0.20.html/a/li lia href=samba-3.0.14a.htmlsamba-3.0.14a.html/a/li lia href=samba-3.0.13.htmlsamba-3.0.13.html/a/li lia href=samba-3.0.12.htmlsamba-3.0.12.html/a/li Modified: trunk/history/index.html === --- trunk/history/index.html2005-11-12 16:29:59 UTC (rev 854) +++ trunk/history/index.html2005-11-12 20:45:13 UTC (rev 855) @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ div class=latest ul - liLatest Release mdash; a href=/samba/#latestSamba 3.0.21pre1/a/li - liCurrent Stable Release mdash; a href=/samba/#stableSamba 3.0.20b/a/li + liLatest Release mdash; a href=/samba/#latestSamba 3.0.21rc1/a/li + liCurrent Stable Release mdash; a href=#stableSamba 3.0.20b/a/li !-- Second link will point to #stable on this page when current release is a development release -- /ul /div @@ -17,6 +17,65 @@ h2Previous Release Announcments/h2 +h4a18 Oct 2005/a/h4 +p class=headlineSamba 3.0.21pre1 Available for Download/p + +pThis is a preview release of the Samba 3.0.21 code base and +is provided for testing only. This release is *not* intended +for production servers. There has been a substantial amount +of development since the 3.0.20 series of stable releases. +We would like to ask the Samba community for help in testing +these changes as we work towards the next significant production +upgrade Samba 3.0 release. Please read the specific changes in the +a href=/samba/ftp/pre/WHATSNEW-3-0-21pre1.txtRelease Notes/a./p + +pThe a href=/samba/ftp/pre/samba-3.0.21pre1.tar.gzSamba 3.0.21pre1 +source code/a can be downloaded now. The a +href=/samba/ftp/pre/samba-3.0.21pre1.tar.ascGnuPG +signature for the emun/emcompressed tarball/a is also available. +If you prefer to download just the diff between 3.0.20b to 3.0.21pre1, the +a href=/samba/ftp/pre/patch-3.0.20b-3.0.21pre1.diffs.gzpatch file/a +(a href=/samba/ftp/pre/patch-3.0.20b-3.0.21pre1.diffs.ascgpg signature/a) is also available. +Precompiled packages for Solaris and Fedora Core 4 are available in the +a href=/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/Binary_Packages +download area/a. Packages for other platforms will be available +shortly./p + +pSamba 3.0.21pre1 is also available via BitTorrent +(a href=http://torrent.samba.org/samba/ftp/pre/samba-3.0.21pre1.tar.gz.torrent;samba-3.0.21pre1.tar.gz.torrent/a). +Note that when downloading via BitTorrent, you are encouraged +to verify the resulting uncompressed tarball's +a href=/samba/ftp/pre/samba-3.0.21pre1.tar.ascGPG signature/a./p + + +h4a name=stable13 Oct 2005/a/h4 +p class=headlineSamba 3.0.20b Available for Download/p + +pWe are proud to announce the production release of Samba 3.0.20b. +This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version +that production Samba servers should be running for all current +bug-fixes. Please read the specific changes in the +a href=/samba/history/samba-3.0.20b.htmlRelease Notes/a./p + +pThe a href=/samba/ftp/stable/samba-3.0.20b.tar.gzSamba 3.0.20b +source code/a can be downloaded now. The a +href=/samba/ftp/stable/samba-3.0.20b.tar.ascGnuPG +signature for the emun/emcompressed tarball/a is also available. +If you prefer to download just the diff between 3.0.20a to 3.0.20b, the +a href=/samba/ftp/patches/patch-3.0.20a-3.0.20b.diffs.gzpatch file/a +(a href=/samba/ftp/patches/patch-3.0.20a-3.0.20b.diffs.ascgpg signature/a) is also available. +Precompiled packages for Solaris, SuSE, Fedora Core 4, and RedHat 9 are available in the +a href=/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/Binary_Packages +download area/a. Packages for other platforms will be available +shortly./p + +pSamba 3.0.20b is also available via BitTorrent +(a href=http://torrent.samba.org/samba/ftp/samba-3.0.20b.tar.gz.torrent;samba-3.0.20b.tar.gz.torrent/a). +Note that when downloading via BitTorrent, you are encouraged +to verify the resulting uncompressed tarball's +a href=/samba/ftp/stable/samba-3.0.20b.tar.ascGPG signature/a./p + + h4a30 Sep 2005/a/h4 p class=headlineSamba 3.0.20a Available for Download/p @@
svn commit: samba r11705 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libnet: .
Author: mimir Date: 2005-11-12 21:44:42 + (Sat, 12 Nov 2005) New Revision: 11705 WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=11705 Log: Fix segfaulting create user function. rafal Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libnet/libnet_user.c Changeset: Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libnet/libnet_user.c === --- branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libnet/libnet_user.c 2005-11-12 18:22:12 UTC (rev 11704) +++ branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libnet/libnet_user.c 2005-11-12 21:44:42 UTC (rev 11705) @@ -31,10 +31,14 @@ struct libnet_Lookup fp; struct libnet_rpc_domain_open dom_io; struct libnet_rpc_useradd user_io; + const char *address; + address = talloc_array(mem_ctx, const char, 8); + /* find domain pdc */ fp.in.hostname= r-in.domain_name; fp.in.methods = NULL; + fp.out.address= address; status = libnet_LookupPdc(ctx, mem_ctx, fp); if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) return status;
Build status as of Sun Nov 13 00:00:02 2005
URL: http://build.samba.org/ --- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2005-11-12 00:00:12.0 + +++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2005-11-13 00:00:10.0 + @@ -1,17 +1,17 @@ -Build status as of Sat Nov 12 00:00:01 2005 +Build status as of Sun Nov 13 00:00:02 2005 Build counts: Tree Total Broken Panic ccache 10 2 0 -distcc 11 2 0 -lorikeet-heimdal 16 15 0 -ppp 16 0 0 +distcc 12 2 0 +lorikeet-heimdal 15 15 0 +ppp 15 0 0 rsync35 2 0 samba4 0 0 samba-docs 0 0 0 -samba4 36 21 0 -samba_3_035 6 0 -smb-build26 4 0 -talloc 12 5 0 -tdb 35 2 0 +samba4 35 21 0 +samba_3_034 6 0 +smb-build26 5 0 +talloc 11 6 0 +tdb 12 3 0
