Re: [Samba] Problems adding a printer share
Thanks to everyone for their assistance! This turned out to be the final hurdle. The MS link is no longer, but as luck would have it, I had a copy of the patch. I installed it, and Windows was able to find the printer! Thanks again! On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:54:05 -0400 Chris Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 21 June 2007, Michael Powell wrote: > > Windows still can't find the printer > > Win9x needs a patch to be able to print via IPP, see: > > http://www.digitalissues.co.uk/html/os/ms/ipp.html#6 > > Once the patch is installed then you can add the printer (a manual process - > it wont show up in a browse list unless you involve Samba in the process). > > Chris > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba-4.0? (waiting to replace SBS2000 AD domain controller)
I support some organizations using Microsoft Small Business Server 2000, with relatively simple Active Directory domains. AFAICT, they use simple printer and server file shares for Windows 9x and 2K and XP clients, the centralized user accounts with server-mapped home directories, and not many other features of a domain. I want to plan a migration away from Microsoft Domain Controllers ASAP. I'm motivated by disaster-recovery and routine management concerns. I'd sleep much better with configuration in /etc plaintext files, rather than some binary registry theoretically backed up on tape. I think I'm obliged to wait for Samba-4.0, and would like to read as much about the planned domain controller capabilities as possible. Is anyone blogging Samba-4.0 development in detail? http://news.samba.org/ has no 4.0 mention since 2007-01-31. I'm reading http://viewcvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/branches/SAMBA_4_0/WHATSNEW.txt?rev=23373&view=auto for information. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: samba Digest, Vol 54, Issue 24
Hello, I am out of the office from Thursday June 14th until Tuesday June 26th. I will get back to you as soon as I can. Thanks, ~Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Help with smbmount
Hello anyone out there going to help me?? --- Barry Stear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am trying to mount another linux samba mount on my > linux machine. I can only mount using root account > and > when i do this the permissions for the samba mount > are > all owned by group root and user root. I want to > have > rw access to this by myself. I have even specified > in > the options of smbmount a uid and gid but still no > luck. > > > > > > > > Need Mail bonding? > Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! > Answers users. > http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091 > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following > URL and read the > instructions: > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games. http://sims.yahoo.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Nagging performance issues with Vista
Jeremy, Could you post the change any way? I am running a mixed client shop here; Linux file server, windows xp/vista clients --Thanks On 6/22/07, Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 10:30:18PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote: > > > > > Ah - the readahead issue. Try using 3.0.25 with the vfs readahead > > module. > > > > Jeremy. > > Jeremy, Andrew > > I think from the context that Andrew has already tried that - at work we have decided that Vista simply isn't worth the hassle now. > > We can't even manage to get Vista on a new laptop to get an IP address from DHCP, never mind connect to our Samba DC! > > Everything else can get an IP (3com and Cisco switches, Mitel IP phones, XP, Solaris, *BSD, etc). Something is fundamentally broken in Vista's network stack IMHO. Was the server Linux based ? The readahead module improved the Vista problem on Linux according to my tests, but one of our OEM's made some kernel changes to their version of Linux to help the problem more. I can post the change if needed. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- --Ryan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Nagging performance issues with Vista
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 10:30:18PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote: > > > > > Ah - the readahead issue. Try using 3.0.25 with the vfs readahead > > module. > > > > Jeremy. > > Jeremy, Andrew > > I think from the context that Andrew has already tried that - at work we have > decided that Vista simply isn't worth the hassle now. > > We can't even manage to get Vista on a new laptop to get an IP address from > DHCP, never mind connect to our Samba DC! > > Everything else can get an IP (3com and Cisco switches, Mitel IP phones, XP, > Solaris, *BSD, etc). Something is fundamentally broken in Vista's network > stack IMHO. Was the server Linux based ? The readahead module improved the Vista problem on Linux according to my tests, but one of our OEM's made some kernel changes to their version of Linux to help the problem more. I can post the change if needed. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Nagging performance issues with Vista
> > Ah - the readahead issue. Try using 3.0.25 with the vfs readahead > module. > > Jeremy. Jeremy, Andrew I think from the context that Andrew has already tried that - at work we have decided that Vista simply isn't worth the hassle now. We can't even manage to get Vista on a new laptop to get an IP address from DHCP, never mind connect to our Samba DC! Everything else can get an IP (3com and Cisco switches, Mitel IP phones, XP, Solaris, *BSD, etc). Something is fundamentally broken in Vista's network stack IMHO. Cheers Alex -- This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential information. Unless you are that person, you may not disclose its contents or use it in any way and are requested to delete the message along with any attachments and notify us immediately. "Transact" is operated by Integrated Financial Arrangements plc Domain House, 5-7 Singer Street, London EC2A 4BQ Tel: (020) 7608 4900 Fax: (020) 7608 1200 (Registered office: as above; Registered in England and Wales under number: 3727592) Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority (entered on the FSA Register; number: 190856) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Nagging performance issues with Vista
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:29:16AM +1000, Andrew Cook wrote: > Hi All, > > I've got some performance issues with Samba and Vista that I just can't > seem to figure out. Googling and fiddling has all been in vain up until > now, so I'm not sure what I can do other than wait for Samba 4, but > maybe someone here can find something I've missed. > > First off, the server is an Athlon 64 1.8GHz running Gentoo 2006.1, > tested with both Samba 3.0.24 and 3.0.25a. Gigabit network is handled by > the onboard nForce controller, and it's got a software RAID 5 setup that > has been running fine for months. > > The client is a dual core Windows box with a PCI-Express gigabit card. > Netperf pegs the network at 100Mbytes/sec, so there's no problems there. > Transfers via FTP on both Windows XP and Vista work out around about > 55Mbytes/sec consistently, and SMB transfers under Windows XP also top > out around 50-55Mbytes/sec, which seems to be the limit of the I/O on > the client. > > Vista however, no matter what I do, will not read from Samba shares at > any more than around 5Mb/s when copying with Explorer. I timed a few > different file copies between XP and Vista, and it's consistently ten > times slower every time. Write speeds seem a lot better (20-30Mb/s). > This happens with both Samba 3.0.24 and 3.0.25a. I've tried with the VFS > readahead both on and off. I've tried with NetBIOS over TCP/IP both on > and off. It's worth noting that if I use the copy command via the > command prompt, read speeds jump to around 8-9Mb/s, but it's still > pretty poor. Ah - the readahead issue. Try using 3.0.25 with the vfs readahead module. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] LTSP and Samba
> I have a question about the possibility of integration of LTSP and > Authentication over Samba. > Its possible to have a LTSP server who authenticate the user on a Samba PDC Of course, the LTSP server is a LINUX box. GDM/XDM authenticate users via PAM. > box and this samba box retrieves these information from an ldap server who > will hold all the users information ? Of course, Samba can use an LDAP SAM. Although one would wonder why you would want to introduce Samba here. Just authenticate users via LDAP directly. > And what are the best configuration for a pc to use samba for this prupose > for about 60 users ? An LTSP server to support 60 users? Or a Samba server to support sixty users? An LTSP server - A WHOLE LOT OF POWER! A Samba server - depends on the users, but you might be able to get by with surprisingly little. -- Adam Tauno Williams, Network & Systems Administrator Consultant - http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com Developer - http://www.opengroupware.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] LTSP and Samba
Hi! I have a question about the possibility of integration of LTSP and Authentication over Samba. Its possible to have a LTSP server who authenticate the user on a Samba PDC box and this samba box retrieves these information from an ldap server who will hold all the users information ? And what are the best configuration for a pc to use samba for this prupose for about 60 users ? -- Maginot Júnior -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] two questions about samba
On Friday 22 June 2007, Jack Mendez wrote: > I would like to deny users access to the pdc based on the hostname. > so if username1 logs into computer1, that is allowed, if the user logs of, > and goes on to computer2, it will be denied because computer2 is a staff > machine I don't think this is valid with the smbpasswd backend With but a tdbsam backend you can use: net sam set workstations Ldap has a entry for this as well (don't know it off the top of my head). > we have students that will sometimes try to use staff machines and i want > the login to fail. > i have lots of log entries that look like. Hmmm...don't know what those entries have to do with it. Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] two questions about samba
I would like to deny users access to the pdc based on the hostname. so if username1 logs into computer1, that is allowed, if the user logs of, and goes on to computer2, it will be denied because computer2 is a staff machine we have students that will sometimes try to use staff machines and i want the login to fail. i have lots of log entries that look like. [2007/06/21 15:44:44, 0] auth/auth_util.c:create_builtin_administrators(785) create_builtin_administrators: Failed to create Administrators [2007/06/21 15:44:44, 2] auth/auth_util.c:create_local_nt_token(899) create_local_nt_token: Failed to create BUILTIN\Administrators group! [2007/06/21 15:44:44, 0] auth/auth_util.c:create_builtin_users(751) create_builtin_users: Failed to create Users create_local_nt_token: Failed to create BUILTIN\Users group! the system is working fine but the logs are filling up with this data. ideas? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] SWAT says nmbd not running when it is
In case anyone was wondering about this one... we were using socket address = x.x.x.x Once we let this default to use all addresses, the status of nmbd in SWAT was correctly displayed. Question for the group: Is any performance improvement realized by specifying the socket address? Helen Helen Nulty wrote: We are running Version 3.0.25a-SerNet-RedHat In SWAT nmbd shows as "not running" when in fact it is. Is this a possible misconfiguration on our part or a bug? Helen -- Helen P. Nulty Systems Analyst UNC-CH School of Public Health Instructional & Information Systems CB# 7400 Chapel Hill, NC 27599 ph: 919-966-9136 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: [3.0.23d] Subdirectories of share root appear empty (sometimes)
Jeremy Allison wrote: I don't suppose you could try 3.0.25 could you ? I re-wrote most of the DFS code for this release - and this type of thing definately sounds like a DFS bug. Thanks for your quick answer; I've had to wait until Friday evening to install the update when the fileserver isn't been used, I've done so now and I'll let you know how it goes. Fingers crossed! James. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] still having printer problems.
greetings, my hp 2605dn printer using samba as a print spooler from solaris 10 won't print from XP, 2000. i've convinced myself that the windoze boxes ship the print job off to the samba print spooler, but the samba print spooler bitbuckets it. samba 3.0.21b (sun's) solaris 10 printer = hp2605dn windows xp, 2000. using bsd protocol. ping works everywhere, nslookup gives the right answers everywhere. samba file shares work. there is no firewall set up. these machines aren't on the internet, never have been, no plan to put them there. solaris "lp filename" works--the print comes out. if i use the solaris smbclient i can put files to the printer and they do print. this works from the windows box: echo hiya^L > \\solarishost\hp2605 i'm guessing that only works because it's not using samba. or do i not know what i'm talking about. on the windows box i can send print jobs (say, from word) and the printer status box says they are spooling. The jobs leave the window and it looks like the print job worked. but nothing comes out of the printer--it looks like no bytes are sent to the printer. test page printouts from the printer properties pulldown do not work. there is no indication of an error on the windows side. there is no indication of anything getting into the queue on the solaris side, but it's possible it's going by too fast--though i doubt it. it really looks like samba on solaris is collecting the bytes from the windows boxes and throwing them away. i have a "switch" (it's probably just a hub) but the lights to the printer don't flicker. i never see anything in lpstat -t lpstat -o should i? this machine is the print spooler so would the file go to the print spooler first and then to the printer? if so, the flickering lights tell me the file goes to the spooler and is tossed out. is there a way to check that? there is no WINS server set up in the printer. the printer has a dns server, netmask, gateway and they are all what i set them to be. aahhh, there seems to be a cadre of people who think using cups will fix this. i have a very slight preference to fixing this w/o cups just to prove i can get it right, but i'm willing to use cups if that's what it takes. j. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] idmap_ad Integration with Windows 2003 pre-R2
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 08:42 -0700, S Murthy Kambhampaty wrote: > Simo, thanks for the info on the configuration syntax. > > I'm still uncertain whether the rfc2307-related AD schema extensions > in Windows 2003 are compatible with Samba, or the R2 schema update > is needed. When I use idmap_ad in our Win2k3 environment, on `getent > passwd` winbind logs an error of "ads_check_posix_schema_mapping: > failed NT_STATUS_NONE_MAPPED" at > libads/ldap_schema.c:ads_check_posix_schema_mapping(243), which > suggests that the AD schema does not have the particular uid/gid > attribs that winbind is looking for. Could this be due to differences > in the schema between the pre-R2 and R2 versions of the AD schema in > Win 2k3? It depends, what schema are you using? We support sfu or rfc2307(R2) Simo. -- Simo Sorce Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Help with smbmount
I am trying to mount another linux samba mount on my linux machine. I can only mount using root account and when i do this the permissions for the samba mount are all owned by group root and user root. I want to have rw access to this by myself. I have even specified in the options of smbmount a uid and gid but still no luck. Need Mail bonding? Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] One file open or locked way too many times. How to fix?
A Windows 2000 Server is a member server of the domain. The domain server is CentOS 4.5 with all updates and Samba 3.0.24 built using the packaging/RHEL/makerpms.sh script. The W2k server is opening this file on the samba server. This problem started several versions of CentOS and Samba ago, and I did the upgrades thinking it would fix it. It did not. It seems to be "locking" or "opening" a file zillions of times and then finally starts throwing errors about "Too Many Files Open". I have all of the kernel, level2, and oplocks set to 'no' in the smb.conf file. The FD column starts out at 1uw and just grows until it reaches whatever 'open file' value I put in the /proc/sys/fs/file-max setting. Rebooting the W2k server or restarting samba fixes the problem for awhile. Never the same amount of time. Sometime it lasts days or weeks, other times only a few hours. smbd 4803root 256uw REG8,2 1825128393 /usr/local/samba/fo/Goldmine/SyncLock.DBF smbd 4803root 257uw REG8,2 1825128393 /usr/local/samba/fo/Goldmine/SyncLock.DBF smbd 4803root 258uw REG8,2 1825128393 /usr/local/samba/fo/Goldmine/SyncLock.DBF smbd 4803root 259uw REG8,2 1825128393 /usr/local/samba/fo/Goldmine/SyncLock.DBF smbd 4803root 260uw REG8,2 1825128393 /usr/local/samba/fo/Goldmine/SyncLock.DBF smbd 4803root 261uw REG8,2 1825128393 /usr/local/samba/fo/Goldmine/SyncLock.DBF smbd 4803root 262uw REG8,2 1825128393 /usr/local/samba/fo/Goldmine/SyncLock.DBF smbd 4803root 263uw REG8,2 1825128393 /usr/local/samba/fo/Goldmine/SyncLock.DBF smbd 4803root 264uw REG8,2 1825128393 /usr/local/samba/fo/Goldmine/SyncLock.DBF smbd 4803root 265uw REG8,2 1825128393 /usr/local/samba/fo/Goldmine/SyncLock.DBF smbd 4803root 266uw REG8,2 1825128393 /usr/local/samba/fo/Goldmine/SyncLock.DBF smbd 4803root 267uw REG8,2 1825128393 /usr/local/samba/fo/Goldmine/SyncLock.DBF smbd 4803root 268uw REG8,2 1825128393 /usr/local/samba/fo/Goldmine/SyncLock.DBF smbd 4803root 269uw REG8,2 1825128393 /usr/local/samba/fo/Goldmine/SyncLock.DBF smbd 4803root 270uw REG8,2 1825128393 /usr/local/samba/fo/Goldmine/SyncLock.DBF smbd 4803root 271uw REG8,2 1825128393 /usr/local/samba/fo/Goldmine/SyncLock.DBF smbd 4803root 272uw REG8,2 1825128393 /usr/local/samba/fo/Goldmine/SyncLock.DBF smbd 4803root 273uw REG8,2 1825128393 /usr/local/samba/fo/Goldmine/SyncLock.DBF -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] idmap_ad Integration with Windows 2003 pre-R2
Simo, thanks for the info on the configuration syntax. I'm still uncertain whether the rfc2307-related AD schema extensions in Windows 2003 are compatible with Samba, or the R2 schema update is needed. When I use idmap_ad in our Win2k3 environment, on `getent passwd` winbind logs an error of "ads_check_posix_schema_mapping: failed NT_STATUS_NONE_MAPPED" at libads/ldap_schema.c:ads_check_posix_schema_mapping(243), which suggests that the AD schema does not have the particular uid/gid attribs that winbind is looking for. Could this be due to differences in the schema between the pre-R2 and R2 versions of the AD schema in Win 2k3? Thanks, Murthy - Original Message From: simo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: S Murthy Kambhampaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 10:28:29 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] idmap_ad Integration with Windows 2003 pre-R2 On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 10:55 -0700, S Murthy Kambhampaty wrote: > Is then new idmap_ad module capable of getting uid/gid info from a Windows > 2003 AD pre-R2 with RFC2307 Unix Identity Mapping Extensions applied? > > Also, is the correct syntax for specifying the schema_mode as follows: > idmap config dom.example.com:schema_mode = rfc2307 Right now we support only the short domain name, not the FQDN domain name, all the rest is like you said. Simo. > > > Simo Sorce > Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://samba.org Never miss an email again! Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Profile deleted
Mario Gzuk wrote: Am Freitag, den 22.06.2007, 06:49 -0500 schrieb Rex Dieter: Is this normal? Yes, Guest account profiles are not persistent (ie, reset on every login). No, the profile is persistent until you add this account to a local group. The M$ documentation says the same as you, but that is not correct for domain-guests, so this behavior is completely strange For machines that are part of a domain, Domain Guests are (by default) members of the local Guests group, and for *me*, Domain Guest profiles get wiped. Dunno why/how it's different for you. -- Rex -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] idmap_ad Integration with Windows 2003 pre-R2
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 10:55 -0700, S Murthy Kambhampaty wrote: > Is then new idmap_ad module capable of getting uid/gid info from a Windows > 2003 AD pre-R2 with RFC2307 Unix Identity Mapping Extensions applied? > > Also, is the correct syntax for specifying the schema_mode as follows: > idmap config dom.example.com:schema_mode = rfc2307 Right now we support only the short domain name, not the FQDN domain name, all the rest is like you said. Simo. > > > Simo Sorce > Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Profile deleted
Am Freitag, den 22.06.2007, 06:49 -0500 schrieb Rex Dieter: > Mario Gzuk wrote: > > > Hi, > > strange things or normal behavior? We have a samba domain and > > "Domain-guests" accounts that are limited to log on to only some > > machines, on this machines the "Domain-guests" are in the lokal admin > > group. > ... > > 3.) log on again with this "Domain-guests" account -> all data and all > > settings are gone. I was not able to find any of the files stored in > > this account (under "Documents and Settings") and all settings are set > > to the default. > > > > Is this normal? > > Yes, Guest account profiles are not persistent (ie, reset on every login). > > -- Rex > No, the profile is persistent until you add this account to a local group. The M$ documentation says the same as you, but that is not correct for domain-guests, so this behavior is completely strange But dont think about that any more. It is as it is, and I dont think that M$ will correct such damn things greetz mario -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] idmap_rid - bug or documentation issue?
I was having some trouble getting identity mapping correct while integrating Samba into a Windows 2003 (pre-R2) environment using the idmap_rid module, that took a while to figure out because of the segfault in 3.0.25a when using the old configuration syntax. The bottom line is that if the selected base_rid is greater than an AD RID, then identity mapping fails. It turns out that in our environment the RID for the target group was less than 1000, so the configuration borrowed from the example in the manpage of idmap_rid was incorrect. Fortunately, there were some domain users that were not in the target group, which, taken together with the fact that the old config syntax in 3.0.24 was producing valid id maps with an implied base_rid of 0, exposed the workaround. So the question is whether the example in the manpage can be changed to make base_rid 0. Come to think of it, what is the purpose of base_rid? Thanks, Murthy Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] idmap_ad Integration with Windows 2003 pre-R2
Is then new idmap_ad module capable of getting uid/gid info from a Windows 2003 AD pre-R2 with RFC2307 Unix Identity Mapping Extensions applied? Also, is the correct syntax for specifying the schema_mode as follows: idmap config dom.example.com:schema_mode = rfc2307 (I am not confident that I am reading the idmap_ad manpage and the new idmap document correctly.) Thanks for the help, Murthy Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] modification time inconsistency
Hello, I have a client with a windows utility that relies on "touch"ing (changing the mod time) on zero-length files in a folder for the purpose of judging when that folder was last accessed. This works fine for him on mapped windows servers, and from the local disk, but from a Samba (v3.0.22) volume, the mod time doesn't change unless there was an actual data change within the file. (ie, clicking "save" in notepad doesn't change the mod time unless he enters some data first.). I know this seems pretty trivial, but it seems to make all the difference for some backup and SCADA software packages. Any ideas what I could do to fix this? This is what the smb.conf looks like: [global] security = user netbios name = Server1 server string = Server1 workgroup = WG comment = File Server os level = 1 create mode = 771 force create mode = 771 directory mode = 771 force directory mode = 771 force user = administrator force group = users map to guest = Bad User null passwords = Yes passdb backend = tdbsam, smbpasswd case sensitive = No username map = /etc/samba/smbusers template shell = /bin/bash dont descend = /proc,/dev,/etc,/usr winbind cache time = 10 log level = 1 max log size = 2000 [Public] writeable = yes only user = yes write list = @Public path = /home/users/Public comment = Public Share valid users = @Public user = @Public Thank you! Carlos Knowlton PS, I'm not on the list, so please CC my return address in your response, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba hangs Pl. Help!!!!!! :(
Hi!! Experts I am running Samba on Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 3 (Taroon Update 8) and users are using thru winodows work station and intermittently their access hangs, below are the messages from /var/log/messages Pl. help Jun 19 09:29:08 dlhl0211 automount[2028]: failed to mount /scratch/* Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]: [2007/06/19 09:29:28, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36) Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]: === Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]: [2007/06/19 09:29:28, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 7 in pid 1298 (3.0.9-1.3E.9) Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]: Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]: [2007/06/19 09:29:28, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]: === Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]: [2007/06/19 09:29:28, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1504) Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]: PANIC: internal error Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]: [2007/06/19 09:29:28, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1512) Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]: BACKTRACE: 20 stack frames: Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#0 smbd(smb_panic2+0x10b) [0x2a9570c6cb] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#1 smbd(smb_panic+0xe) [0x2a9570c5ae] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#2 smbd [0x2a956faa29] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#3 /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 [0x2a96d7fa20] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#4 /lib64/tls/libc.so.6(memcpy+0x60) [0x2a96dd0740] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#5 smbd [0x2a9571d893] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#6 smbd [0x2a9571e317] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#7 smbd [0x2a9571e714] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#8 smbd(tdb_store+0x108) [0x2a9571f708] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#9 smbd(claim_connection+0x20e) [0x2a955cc10e] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#10 smbd [0x2a9561705e] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#11 smbd(make_connection+0xf9) [0x2a95617e99] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#12 smbd(reply_tcon_and_X+0x1bd) [0x2a955e653d] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#13 smbd [0x2a956150de] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#14 smbd [0x2a956152aa] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#15 smbd(process_smb+0x8d) [0x2a9561547d] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#16 smbd(smbd_process+0x147) [0x2a95616197] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#17 smbd(main+0x3e7) [0x2a95778fd7] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#18 /lib64/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xd7) [0x2a96d6d1d7] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]:#19 smbd [0x2a955c09aa] Jun 19 09:29:28 dlhl0211 smbd[1298]: Jun 19 09:29:36 dlhl0211 smbd[1843]: [2007/06/19 09:29:36, 0] smbd/dfree.c:disk_free(138) Jun 19 09:29:36 dlhl0211 smbd[1843]: WARNING: dfree is broken on this system Jun 19 09:20:15 dlhl0211 smbd[1241]: tdb(/etc/samba/secrets.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 55 ltype=1 (Interrupted system call) Jun 19 09:20:15 dlhl0211 smbd[1241]: [2007/06/19 09:20:15, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal(77) Jun 19 09:20:15 dlhl0211 smbd[1241]: tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal: alarm (10) timed out for key DLHDC02 in tdb /etc/samba/secrets.tdb Jun 19 09:20:15 dlhl0211 smbd[1068]: [2007/06/19 09:20:15, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725) Jun 19 09:20:15 dlhl0211 smbd[1068]: tdb(/etc/samba/secrets.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 55 ltype=1 (Interrupted system call) Jun 19 09:20:15 dlhl0211 smbd[1068]: [2007/06/19 09:20:15, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal(77) Jun 19 09:20:15 dlhl0211 smbd[1068]: tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal: alarm (10) timed out for key DLHDC02 in tdb /etc/samba/secrets.tdb Jun 19 09:20:16 dlhl0211 smbd[1094]: [2007/06/19 09:20:16, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725) Jun 19 09:20:16 dlhl0211 smbd[1094]: tdb(/etc/samba/secrets.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 55 ltype=1 (Interrupted system call) Jun 19 09:20:16 dlhl0211 smbd[1094]: [2007/06/19 09:20:16, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal(77) Jun 19 09:20:16 dlhl0211 smbd[1094]: tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal: alarm (10) timed out for key DLHDC02 in tdb /etc/samba/secrets.tdb Jun 19 09:20:17 dlhl0211 smbd[1047]: [2007/06/19 09:20:17, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725) Jun 19 09:20:17 dlhl0211 smbd[1047]: tdb(/etc/samba/secrets.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 55 ltype=1 (Interrupted system call) Jun 19 09:20:17 dlhl0211 smbd[1047]: [2007/06/19 09:20:17, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal(77) Jun 19 09:20:17 dlhl0211 smbd[1047]: tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal: alarm (10) timed out for key DLHDC02 in tdb /etc/samba/secrets.tdb Thanks Indy -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/sa
[Samba] Samba Guest Accout Issue
So, after rebuilding and finding that somehow fixed my intial issue of failing to connect to the ldap server, I am now having an issue with the guest account. Any ideas, I've done some searches but haven't been having any luck. This is on RHEL. Help is greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Maximum core file size limits now 16777216(soft) -1(hard) get_current_groups: user is in 7 groups: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10 smbd version 3.0.25a started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2007 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 egid=0 Build environment: Built by:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Built on:Sun Jun 3 14:16:00 PDT 2007 Built using: gcc Build host: Linux zimbra1.hfc.com 2.6.9-42.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jul 12 23:27:17 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux SRCDIR: /usr/samba-3.0.25a/source BUILDDIR:/usr/samba-3.0.25a/source Paths: SBINDIR: /usr/local/samba/sbin BINDIR: /usr/local/samba/bin/ SWATDIR: /usr/local/samba/swat CONFIGFILE: /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf LOGFILEBASE: /usr/local/samba/var LMHOSTSFILE: /usr/local/samba/lib/lmhosts LIBDIR: /usr/local/samba/lib SHLIBEXT: so LOCKDIR: /usr/local/samba/var/locks PIDDIR: /usr/local/samba/var/locks SMB_PASSWD_FILE: /usr/local/samba/private/secrets.tdb PRIVATE_DIR: /usr/local/samba/private/ System Headers: HAVE_SYS_ACL_H HAVE_SYS_CAPABILITY_H HAVE_SYS_CDEFS_H HAVE_SYS_FCNTL_H HAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H HAVE_SYS_IPC_H HAVE_SYS_MMAN_H HAVE_SYS_MOUNT_H HAVE_SYS_PARAM_H HAVE_SYS_PRCTL_H HAVE_SYS_QUOTA_H HAVE_SYS_RESOURCE_H HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H HAVE_SYS_SHM_H HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H HAVE_SYS_STATFS_H HAVE_SYS_STATVFS_H HAVE_SYS_STAT_H HAVE_SYS_SYSCALL_H HAVE_SYS_SYSLOG_H HAVE_SYS_SYSMACROS_H HAVE_SYS_TIME_H HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H HAVE_SYS_UIO_H HAVE_SYS_UNISTD_H HAVE_SYS_UN_H HAVE_SYS_VFS_H HAVE_SYS_WAIT_H HAVE_SYS_XATTR_H Headers: HAVE_ACL_LIBACL_H HAVE_AIO_H HAVE_ALLOCA_H HAVE_ARPA_INET_H HAVE_ASM_TYPES_H HAVE_ASM_UNISTD_H HAVE_ATTR_XATTR_H HAVE_CTYPE_H HAVE_DIRENT_H HAVE_DLFCN_H HAVE_EXECINFO_H HAVE_FCNTL_H HAVE_FLOAT_H HAVE_FNMATCH_H HAVE_GLOB_H HAVE_GRP_H HAVE_GSSAPI_GSSAPI_GENERIC_H HAVE_GSSAPI_GSSAPI_H HAVE_INTTYPES_H HAVE_KRB5_H HAVE_LANGINFO_H HAVE_LASTLOG_H HAVE_LBER_H HAVE_LDAP_H HAVE_LIMITS_H HAVE_LOCALE_H HAVE_MEMORY_H HAVE_MNTENT_H HAVE_NETDB_H HAVE_NETINET_IN_H HAVE_NETINET_IN_SYSTM_H HAVE_NETINET_IP_H HAVE_NETINET_TCP_H HAVE_NET_IF_H HAVE_NSS_H HAVE_PWD_H HAVE_READLINE_HISTORY_H HAVE_READLINE_READLINE_H HAVE_RPCSVC_NIS_H HAVE_RPCSVC_YPCLNT_H HAVE_RPCSVC_YP_PROT_H HAVE_RPC_RPC_H HAVE_SETJMP_H HAVE_SHADOW_H HAVE_STDARG_H HAVE_STDBOOL_H HAVE_STDINT_H HAVE_STDIO_H HAVE_STDLIB_H HAVE_STRINGS_H HAVE_STRING_H HAVE_SYSCALL_H HAVE_SYSLOG_H HAVE_TERMIOS_H HAVE_TERMIO_H HAVE_TIME_H HAVE_UNISTD_H HAVE_UTIME_H HAVE_VALGRIND_MEMCHECK_H HAVE_VALGRIND_VALGRIND_H UTMP Options: HAVE_GETUTMPX HAVE_UTMPX_H HAVE_UTMP_H HAVE_UT_UT_ADDR HAVE_UT_UT_EXIT HAVE_UT_UT_HOST HAVE_UT_UT_ID HAVE_UT_UT_NAME HAVE_UT_UT_PID HAVE_UT_UT_TIME HAVE_UT_UT_TV HAVE_UT_UT_TYPE HAVE_UT_UT_USER PUTUTLINE_RETURNS_UTMP WITH_UTMP HAVE_* Defines: HAVE_ADDRTYPE_IN_KRB5_ADDRESS HAVE_AP_OPTS_USE_SUBKEY HAVE_ASPRINTF HAVE_ASPRINTF_DECL HAVE_ATEXIT HAVE_BACKTRACE_SYMBOLS HAVE_BER_SCANF HAVE_BOOL HAVE_BZERO HAVE_C99_VSNPRINTF HAVE_CAP_GET_PROC HAVE_CHMOD HAVE_CHOWN HAVE_CHROOT HAVE_COMPARISON_FN_T HAVE_COMPILER_WILL_OPTIMIZE_OUT_FNS HAVE_CONNECT HAVE_CREAT64 HAVE_CRYPT HAVE_DECL_ASPRINTF HAVE_DECL_RL_EVENT_HOOK HAVE_DECL_SNPRINTF HAVE_DECL_VASPRINTF HAVE_DECL_VSNPRINTF HAVE_DEVICE_MAJOR_FN HAVE_DEVICE_MINOR_FN HAVE_DIRENT_D_OFF HAVE_DLCLOSE HAVE_DLERROR HAVE_DLOPEN HAVE_DLSYM HAVE_DUP2 HAVE_ENDMNTENT HAVE_ENDNETGRENT HAVE_ERRNO_DECL HAVE_EXECL HAVE_EXPLICIT_LARGEFILE_SUPPORT HAVE_FCHMOD HAVE_FCHOWN HAVE_FCNTL_LOCK HAVE_FCVT HAVE_FGETXATTR HAVE_FLISTXATTR HAVE_FOPEN64 HAVE_FREMOVEXATTR HAVE_FSEEKO64 HAVE_FSETXATTR HAVE_FSID_INT HAVE_FSTAT HAVE_FSTAT64 HAVE_FSYNC HAVE_FTELLO64 HAVE_FTRUNCATE HAVE_FTRUNCATE64 HAVE_FTRUNCATE_EXTEND HAVE_FUNCTION_MACRO HAVE_GETCWD HAVE_GETDIRENTRIES HAVE_GETGRENT HAVE_GETGRNAM HAVE_GETMNTENT HAVE_GETNETGRENT HAVE_GETPAGESIZE HAVE_GETPGRP HAVE_GETPWENT_R HAVE_GETRLIMIT HAVE_GETSPNAM HAVE_GETTIMEOFDAY_TZ HAVE_GETXATTR HAVE_GLOB HAVE_GRANTPT HAVE_GSSAPI HAVE_GSS_DISPLAY_STATUS HAVE_HISTORY_LIST HAVE_ICONV HAVE_IFACE_IFCONF HAVE_IMMEDIATE_STRUCTURES HAVE_INITGROUPS HAVE_INITIALIZE_KRB5_ERROR_TABLE HAVE_INNETGR HAVE_KERNEL_CHANGE_NOTIFY HAVE_KERNEL_OPLOCKS_LINUX HAVE_KERNEL_SHARE_MODES HAVE_KRB5 HAVE_KRB5_AUTH_CON_SETUSERUSERKEY HAVE_KRB5_C_ENCTYPE_COMPARE HAVE_KRB5_C_VERIFY_CHECKSUM HAVE_KRB5_ENCRYPT_BLOCK HAVE_KRB5_ENCRYPT_DATA HAVE_KRB5_FREE_DATA_CONTENTS HAVE_KRB5_FREE_KEYTAB_ENTRY_CONTE
[Samba] symlinks with missing destination are hidden - can they be shown?
If a directory contains a symlink to a file which is missing, then samba hides the file when listing the directory. This leads to unpleasant behaviour on the client: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls test [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ rm -rf test rm: cannot remove directory `test': Directory not empty The only workaround I have is to remove the directory on the server. Can samba be configured not to hide the symlink? thanks, -- James Casbon Point Nine Financial Technologies Ltd Work : +44 (0) 20 7340 9544 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Smbclient help!
Hi I have a question How do i access a subdirectory of a windows share using smbclient? The problem is that i have a windows folder \\192.168.1.33\dvds shared in a windows machine but i want a direct access with smbclient from a linux machine to the folder \\192.168.1.33\dvds\examples. Is it possible?? any /etc/fstab setting to do this? Im using suse linux enterprise server 8 and samba 2.2.8 -- Greetings, Oskar Kossuth E. Administrador Unix [EMAIL PROTECTED] ANTEL telecomunicaciones Este e-mail y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información. . . . . . . . . . This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] share names in WXP
I use samba 3.0.9 on my server. Now I installed WXP on one of the clients but I have problems with the network share names. If a user wants to download something on the network share he can see only the name of the samba "Samba 3.0.9." but he can not see the name of the share (the dialog box is small). Under windows 2000 there is not problem with it. Of course I have the network share names mapped on the letters. could anyone please help me what to change so that the user could see the name of the share when e.g. downloading a document on the network drive? Thank libor -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem using root preexec
I'm having trouble getting root preexec to work. The version of Samba I have is an older one (2.2.7) and I can't upgrade it since I don't want to go to the trouble of getting and compiling the source code for QNX. What I really want to do is have our Windows GUI machine be able to execute scripts on my QNX machine (checking filesystem integrity, untarring software bundles etc) as QNX scripts (not Dos batch commands). However there doesn't seem to be any way to have that happen. So instead I want to use the preexec command to upgrade the software by running a script that will untar an archive and set file permissions when a 'download' user logs in. I created a user called 'download' on my machine. I added 'download' to the smbpassword file. I can easily connect from the Windows machine as the 'download' user. In my smb.conf file I added the following: [download] root preexec /bin/upgradeScript path = /home/download But no matter how many times I log in now as 'download' my script is never executed. Any ideas of what I am doing wrong? TIA, Tim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-using-root-preexec-tf3937613.html#a11167961 Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problems adding a printer share
I have added an HP Deskjet 600 to my debian etch system, using CUPS. It is working fine. I would like to set it up so that I can occassionally print to it from a Windows 9x machine. This is where I seem to be having trouble. I consulted the HOW-TO docs on the samba site, but they are quite detailed and confusing (for me). I don't want to do anything that will cause the printer to work for the Win9x machine, but stop working properly on the debian machine. I am probably wrong, but what little I did understand of the HOW-TO gave me the impression that it might indeed cause problems. I really need something that is more like "A Dummy's Guide to SAMBA and Print Shares." The Win9x machine can currently see/access the other shares defined on the debian box. Is there an "dummy's" way to set the printer share up so that my Win9x machine can see it? Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem with Samba config under SUSE SLES 10
Hi all, I'm having some difficulty configuring Samba correctly. Something I've noticed is that changes I make to Samba config through YAST aren't being retained in smb.conf. The smb.conf timestamp appears to change ... but that is all. Can anyone suggest what the problem could be? Does this mean I'll have to use command line configuration? Greg Shearer Greg Shearer - Senior Systems Engineer PO Box 245C, Newcastle, NSW 2300 PH: 02 4935 4962 Fax: 02 4935 4959 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.onesteel.com OneSteel Market Mills The material contained in this email may be confidential, privileged or copyrighted. If you are not the intended recipient, use, disclosure or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this document in error, please advise the sender and delete the document. Neither OneSteel nor the sender accept responsibility for any viruses contained in this email or any attachments. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Invalid Argument ls dir mounted share
Max, I will try yum update, even tought you told me that it inst fix the problem ... Tomorrow i will write to you and tell what happened. Man ... Im so sorry for my English ok..? Im Brazillian and dont speak very well. Thanks :-) Max Kipness wrote: > > Andserson, > > Looks like the fix it to upgrade from the stock kernel in FC6. I tried an > update using 'Yum update kernel' but nothing is found in the default > repositories yet I suppose. I'm going to see if I find another repository > that has a kernel update rpm package. Would you happen to know of any or > another simple method to upgrade? I surely don't want to bother with > updating the kernel from source, plus I'm doing this remotely. In the past > Yum based kernel updates have gone well for me. > > If I can't figure it out, I will have to travel to the server, and install > Fedora 7 which with the new kernel supposedly fixes this issue. > > Thanks for all your help diagnosing this issue. > > Max > > > Anderson Kopke wrote: >> >> Max, >> >> Please look at >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211070 >> >> "..Just to summarize - >> readdir (ls) will fail on cifs with 2.6.18-fc6, and similar fc5 versions >> for >> directories which contain about 120 files or more (it depends on the >> length of >> the file names) >> >> As Eric found (see above) the bug shows up because the Fedora kernel now >> sets >> the recommended i/o size on cifs inodes incorrectly (it was set based on >> blkbits >> which for cifs is 16K - .." >> >>Maybe it will help us. >> >> >> Max Kipness wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for the reply. The Samba list is probably the hardest list to get >>> an answer from, it's very strange. >>> >>> Anyway, it's good to know I'm not the only one that noticed this. I'm >>> thinking I did not have this issue with prior versions of Fedora, but >>> I'm not positive. I'm wondering if it's a cifs bug. Hopefully someone >>> that knows more about this will reply. >>> >>> Have you found any pattern to your problem? As far as contents of the >>> directory? >>> >>> If I find a solution, I will be sure and let you know. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Max >>> >>> Anderson Kopke wrote: Man... Im having this same problem. Im also using Fedora Core 6, and i will sugest you make a test. Try to open your directory with firefox (like file:///). When i do that, firefox open the directory normally. I know, it inst solve our problem but its a evidence. Well, i will try to find more information about it, if i solve it first than you .. i will tell you. ok? Good Luck. Max Kipness wrote: > > Anyone, please? > > > > Max Kipness wrote: >> >> I'm using Fedora Core 6 which uses cifs.mount version 1.10. When >> mounting shares from a particular Windows 2003 R2 server, I cannot >> read certain directories. For example, when performing an 'ls' >> command as follows: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Admin]# ls /share/CORP-SERVER/C\$/Corp/User\ Files/xxx\ >> Finacial\ Shared/Admin/Freddie\ Mac/ >> ls: reading directory /share/CORP-SERVER/C$/Corp/User Files/xxx >> Finacial Shared/Admin/Freddie Mac/: Invalid argument >> >> No matter how I try to read this directory 'Freddie Mac' I get the >> same error. I can even CD into the directory, but when doing an 'ls' >> from inside, I get the same error. >> >> The mount with cifs succeeds fine, no errors. 98% of the directories >> can be read fine, but there are a few that give this error. >> >> After some testing it seems like the problem has to do possibly with >> the type of files, or characters in the name. In this directory there >> are many .docx files. Also some of the files names have pound signs >> and some file names start with a number. The strange thing is that if >> I move all files except for 47 of the files, I can do the 'ls' from >> linux. However, if I add the 48th file back to this directory I start >> getting the 'Invalid Argument' >> error again. I tested other directories with more than 48 files and >> never get this error, so it has something to do with these files and >> having more than 48. I also moved the files to a different folder, >> and still had the same error reading the new folder contents. >> >> Anybody have any clue as to what the problem might be? Any tips on >> what I can try to remedy? Anything? >> >> Thanks, >> Max >> >> > > >>> >>> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Invalid-Argument-ls-dir-mounted-share-tf3907351.html#a11130926 Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://list
Re: [Samba] Invalid Argument ls dir mounted share
Max, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211070 It was confirmed. I splitt my big directory in two directories. After that ... ls and konqueror read it fine :-) I will update my FC6 .. and pray this cifs bug being solved. Max Kipness wrote: > > Thanks for the reply. The Samba list is probably the hardest list to get > an answer from, it's very strange. > > Anyway, it's good to know I'm not the only one that noticed this. I'm > thinking I did not have this issue with prior versions of Fedora, but I'm > not positive. I'm wondering if it's a cifs bug. Hopefully someone that > knows more about this will reply. > > Have you found any pattern to your problem? As far as contents of the > directory? > > If I find a solution, I will be sure and let you know. > > Thanks, > Max > > Anderson Kopke wrote: >> >> Man... >> >> Im having this same problem. Im also using Fedora Core 6, and i will >> sugest you make a test. Try to open your directory with firefox (like >> file:///). When i do that, firefox open the directory >> normally. I know, it inst solve our problem but its a evidence. >> >> Well, i will try to find more information about it, if i solve it first >> than you .. i will tell you. ok? >> >> Good Luck. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Max Kipness wrote: >>> >>> Anyone, please? >>> >>> >>> >>> Max Kipness wrote: I'm using Fedora Core 6 which uses cifs.mount version 1.10. When mounting shares from a particular Windows 2003 R2 server, I cannot read certain directories. For example, when performing an 'ls' command as follows: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Admin]# ls /share/CORP-SERVER/C\$/Corp/User\ Files/xxx\ Finacial\ Shared/Admin/Freddie\ Mac/ ls: reading directory /share/CORP-SERVER/C$/Corp/User Files/xxx Finacial Shared/Admin/Freddie Mac/: Invalid argument No matter how I try to read this directory 'Freddie Mac' I get the same error. I can even CD into the directory, but when doing an 'ls' from inside, I get the same error. The mount with cifs succeeds fine, no errors. 98% of the directories can be read fine, but there are a few that give this error. After some testing it seems like the problem has to do possibly with the type of files, or characters in the name. In this directory there are many .docx files. Also some of the files names have pound signs and some file names start with a number. The strange thing is that if I move all files except for 47 of the files, I can do the 'ls' from linux. However, if I add the 48th file back to this directory I start getting the 'Invalid Argument' error again. I tested other directories with more than 48 files and never get this error, so it has something to do with these files and having more than 48. I also moved the files to a different folder, and still had the same error reading the new folder contents. Anybody have any clue as to what the problem might be? Any tips on what I can try to remedy? Anything? Thanks, Max >>> >>> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Invalid-Argument-ls-dir-mounted-share-tf3907351.html#a11126795 Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Invalid Argument ls dir mounted share
Max, Please look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211070 "..Just to summarize - readdir (ls) will fail on cifs with 2.6.18-fc6, and similar fc5 versions for directories which contain about 120 files or more (it depends on the length of the file names) As Eric found (see above) the bug shows up because the Fedora kernel now sets the recommended i/o size on cifs inodes incorrectly (it was set based on blkbits which for cifs is 16K - .." Maybe it will help us. Max Kipness wrote: > > Thanks for the reply. The Samba list is probably the hardest list to get > an answer from, it's very strange. > > Anyway, it's good to know I'm not the only one that noticed this. I'm > thinking I did not have this issue with prior versions of Fedora, but I'm > not positive. I'm wondering if it's a cifs bug. Hopefully someone that > knows more about this will reply. > > Have you found any pattern to your problem? As far as contents of the > directory? > > If I find a solution, I will be sure and let you know. > > Thanks, > Max > > Anderson Kopke wrote: >> >> Man... >> >> Im having this same problem. Im also using Fedora Core 6, and i will >> sugest you make a test. Try to open your directory with firefox (like >> file:///). When i do that, firefox open the directory >> normally. I know, it inst solve our problem but its a evidence. >> >> Well, i will try to find more information about it, if i solve it first >> than you .. i will tell you. ok? >> >> Good Luck. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Max Kipness wrote: >>> >>> Anyone, please? >>> >>> >>> >>> Max Kipness wrote: I'm using Fedora Core 6 which uses cifs.mount version 1.10. When mounting shares from a particular Windows 2003 R2 server, I cannot read certain directories. For example, when performing an 'ls' command as follows: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Admin]# ls /share/CORP-SERVER/C\$/Corp/User\ Files/xxx\ Finacial\ Shared/Admin/Freddie\ Mac/ ls: reading directory /share/CORP-SERVER/C$/Corp/User Files/xxx Finacial Shared/Admin/Freddie Mac/: Invalid argument No matter how I try to read this directory 'Freddie Mac' I get the same error. I can even CD into the directory, but when doing an 'ls' from inside, I get the same error. The mount with cifs succeeds fine, no errors. 98% of the directories can be read fine, but there are a few that give this error. After some testing it seems like the problem has to do possibly with the type of files, or characters in the name. In this directory there are many .docx files. Also some of the files names have pound signs and some file names start with a number. The strange thing is that if I move all files except for 47 of the files, I can do the 'ls' from linux. However, if I add the 48th file back to this directory I start getting the 'Invalid Argument' error again. I tested other directories with more than 48 files and never get this error, so it has something to do with these files and having more than 48. I also moved the files to a different folder, and still had the same error reading the new folder contents. Anybody have any clue as to what the problem might be? Any tips on what I can try to remedy? Anything? Thanks, Max >>> >>> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Invalid-Argument-ls-dir-mounted-share-tf3907351.html#a11126322 Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Invalid Argument ls dir mounted share
Man... Im having this same problem. Im also using Fedora Core 6, and i will sugest you make a test. Try to open your directory with firefox (like file:///). When i do that, firefox open the directory normally. I know, it inst solve our problem but its a evidence. Well, i will try to find more information about it, if i solve it first than you .. i will tell you. ok? Good Luck. Max Kipness wrote: > > Anyone, please? > > > > Max Kipness wrote: >> >> I'm using Fedora Core 6 which uses cifs.mount version 1.10. When mounting >> shares from a particular Windows 2003 R2 server, I cannot read certain >> directories. For example, when performing an 'ls' command as follows: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Admin]# ls /share/CORP-SERVER/C\$/Corp/User\ Files/xxx\ >> Finacial\ Shared/Admin/Freddie\ Mac/ >> ls: reading directory /share/CORP-SERVER/C$/Corp/User Files/xxx Finacial >> Shared/Admin/Freddie Mac/: Invalid argument >> >> No matter how I try to read this directory 'Freddie Mac' I get the same >> error. I can even CD into the directory, but when doing an 'ls' from >> inside, I get the same error. >> >> The mount with cifs succeeds fine, no errors. 98% of the directories can >> be read fine, but there are a few that give this error. >> >> After some testing it seems like the problem has to do possibly with the >> type of files, or characters in the name. In this directory there are >> many .docx files. Also some of the files names have pound signs and some >> file names start with a number. The strange thing is that if I move all >> files except for 47 of the files, I can do the 'ls' from linux. However, >> if I add the 48th file back to this directory I start getting the >> 'Invalid Argument' >> error again. I tested other directories with more than 48 files and never >> get this error, so it has something to do with these files and having >> more than 48. I also moved the files to a different folder, and still had >> the same error reading the new folder contents. >> >> Anybody have any clue as to what the problem might be? Any tips on what I >> can try to remedy? Anything? >> >> Thanks, >> Max >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Invalid-Argument-ls-dir-mounted-share-tf3907351.html#a11125180 Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Question - Tech issue - Bad file descriptor
Hi all, I've read everywhere I could on this issue and it seems no one has yet to find a solution. It seems I have a Samba issue as is being shown in dmesg and /var/log/messages: Dmesg: smb_lookup: find //logs failed, error=-5 /var/log/messages: Jun 12 17:12:56 esgstdev01 kernel: smb_request: result -104, setting invalid Jun 12 17:12:56 esgstdev01 mount.smbfs[1038]: [2007/06/12 17:12:56, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725) Jun 12 17:12:56 esgstdev01 mount.smbfs[1038]: tdb(/var/cache/samba/gencache.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 17 ltype=0 (Bad file desc riptor) Jun 12 17:12:56 esgstdev01 kernel: smb_retry: successful, new pid=1038, generation=513 If anyone has a clue on how to resolve this, please reply. Cheers, Martin Timbro Adminstrateur Systemes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbfs intermittent errors: tdb_lock failed, ERRDOS 71
I mounted //winxp/linuxbu onto to a 2nd new mountpoint called /mnt/buonwinxp. I got same errors as you. So I first verified if password of the //winxp/linuxbu was wrong. With a wrong password, I got response as below: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbmount //winxp/linuxbu /mnt/buonwinxp -o username=linuxbu uid=root gid=root rw Password : y 9982: session setup failed: ERRDOS - ERRnoaccess (Access denied.) SMB connection failed Then, I verified using correct password of WinXP to mount //winxp/linuxbu on /mnt/buonwinxp. I got response as below. [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbmount //winxp/linuxbu /mnt/buonwinxp -o username=linuxbu uid=root gid=root rw Password : x: 9983: tree connect failed: ERRDOS - 71 SMB connection failed Then I checked the number of connections allowed to use the //winxp/linuxbu share of WinXP. I had set this for only 1 user. I changed the WinXP settings of the share by rightclicktaboption I got response as below, and mount was now fine. [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbmount //winxp/linuxbu /mnt/buonwinxp -o username=linuxbu uid=root gid=root rw Password : x [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# Maybe, you have exceeded the default setting of 10 users in WinXP. Mohan Sukumar, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, INDIA -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Local authentication when member server
Hi all, I have a machine joined to AD as a member server and have home drives and roaming profiles redirected in AD to the local samba member server. Users that login are authenticated via winbind and AD. I'm wondering if it is possible to have local users on the Samba system in tdbsam or ldapsam. I did try but no luck so far. Has anyone done this? -- George Farris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Malaspina University-College As with the rail barons of the past: "There is no reason why the computer industry should have to put up with 'private standards' any longer. The word 'incompatible' is a dirty word. It's time to run those who insist on using it out of the business." -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Intermittent "INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11" with 3.0.24
Hi all Follow up to this post, we've been able to capture a gdb backtrace. Can anyone help with guidance as to what this means. See below: (gdb) bt #0 0xe410 in ?? () #1 0x0001 in ?? () #2 0x in ?? () #3 0xbfffc9d8 in ?? () #4 0x402b36e3 in __waitpid_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #5 0x4025ef58 in do_system () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #6 0x402268dd in system () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 #7 0x0822b612 in smb_panic (why=0x0) at lib/util.c:1608 #8 0x08219b3f in fault_report (sig=-512) at lib/fault.c:47 #9 0x08219b50 in sig_fault (sig=-512) at lib/fault.c:70 #10 #11 0x40292d1b in strlen () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #12 0x40268242 in vfprintf () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #13 0x40285e76 in vsnprintf () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #14 0x08219956 in dbgtext (format_str=0x6d2e5c73 "") at lib/debug.c:1011 #15 0x0825b360 in oplock_timeout_handler (te=0x844ce10, now=0xbfffd9c0, private_data=0x84492f0) at smbd/oplock.c:351 #16 0x08242d7d in run_events () at lib/events.c:102 #17 0x080f2801 in receive_message_or_smb (buffer=0x40433008 "", buffer_len=131137, timeout=6) at smbd/process.c:457 #18 0x080f4122 in smbd_process () at smbd/process.c:1649 #19 0x082beea9 in main (argc=1831754867, argv=0xbfffdd34) at smbd/server.c:1024 This is similar to the following panic message recorded in syslog: Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]: [2007/06/13 12:57:29, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_timeout_handler(351) Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]: [2007/06/13 12:57:29, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]: === Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]: [2007/06/13 12:57:29, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(42) Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 16322 (3.0.24-SerNet-SuSE) Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]: Please read the Trouble-Shooting section of the Samba3-HOWTO Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]: [2007/06/13 12:57:29, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(44) Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]: Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]: From: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-HOWTO.pdf Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]: [2007/06/13 12:57:29, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(45) Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]: === Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]: [2007/06/13 12:57:29, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1599) Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]: PANIC (pid 16322): internal error Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]: [2007/06/13 12:57:29, 0] lib/util.c:log_stack_trace(1706) Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]: BACKTRACE: 14 stack frames: Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]:#0 /usr/sbin/smbd(log_stack_trace+0x22) [0x822b6fb] Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]:#1 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x6f) [0x822b59a] Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]:#2 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x8219b3f] Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]:#3 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x8219b50] Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]:#4 [0xe420] Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]:#5 /lib/tls/libc.so.6(vsnprintf+0xb6) [0x40285e76] Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]:#6 /usr/sbin/smbd(dbgtext+0x2e) [0x8219956] Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]:#7 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x825b360] Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]:#8 /usr/sbin/smbd(run_events+0x15f) [0x8242d7d] Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]:#9 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x80f2801] Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]:#10 /usr/sbin/smbd(smbd_process+0x10e) [0x80f4122] Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]:#11 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0x946) [0x82beea9] Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]:#12 /lib/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xd0) [0x40240210] Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]:#13 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x808ceb1] Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]: [2007/06/13 12:57:29, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1607) Jun 13 12:57:29 uhti02 smbd[16322]: smb_panic(): calling panic action [/bin/sleep 9] Versions: Kernel: 2.6.5-7.97-bigsmp smbd, nmbd, winbindd: Version 3.0.24-SerNet-SuSE As I said earlier this problem occurs intermittently every 2-3 days, in 2 separate Samba installations, and when it occurs Samba requires a restart to clear. Much appreciated. Joe - Original Message Follows - > Hi Samba list, > > We're experiencing some issues with our Samba 3.0.24 > environments. Hopefully somebody can offer suggestions or > guidance. > > A bit of background. We have 3 application environments, > which consist of a Samba host providing file sharing > services to 7 Windows application servers. > > These Samba hosts intermittently experiencing problem > providing file sharing. So far we haven't established a > pattern with the failures, so for now the best we can > establish is that every couple of days a Samba host will > experience a Internal Error (signal 11) in an smbd > process. From that point onwards the smbd process will > operate unreliability such that Windows clients will > generally not be able to connect to th
[Samba] Question - technical issue
Hi all, I've read everywhere I could on this issue and it seems no one has yet to find a solution. It seems I have a Samba issue as is being shown in dmesg and /var/log/messages: Dmesg: smb_lookup: find //logs failed, error=-5 /var/log/messages: Jun 12 17:12:56 esgstdev01 kernel: smb_request: result -104, setting invalid Jun 12 17:12:56 esgstdev01 mount.smbfs[1038]: [2007/06/12 17:12:56, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725) Jun 12 17:12:56 esgstdev01 mount.smbfs[1038]: tdb(/var/cache/samba/gencache.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 17 ltype=0 (Bad file desc riptor) Jun 12 17:12:56 esgstdev01 kernel: smb_retry: successful, new pid=1038, generation=513 If anyone has a clue on how to resolve this, please reply. Cheers, Martin Timbro Systems Administrator -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] valid users directory containing local groups
I have a remote user, ISI\jhaltom, which is mapped to the local Unix user ISI\jhaltom using Winbind, idmap_ad and sfu. No entry for ISI \jhaltom appears in /etc/passwd. In /etc/group I have a local group "admin" who contains ISI\jhaltom in it's member list. When I change user to ISI\jhaltom and type groups, it shows him as a member of "admin". I have a share with valid users set to @admin. The user jhaltom cannot access the share, NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. Logs show that "ISI\jhaltom is not a member of valid users". Is Samba tracing down these local group memberships in the same way that NSS is? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] windows to unix user name mappings
I'd like my canonical Unix names to be of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there anyway to accomplish this? I'd also like NSS to lookup all the various variations and return that canonical representation. This seems to me to be the most appropriate way to map them. Is there a way to configure this? If not, is there anyway to return DOMAIN\user when lookups for 'user' happen? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Guest account access with User mode security?
Hi, I have finally had time to put up the test server and perform the actions that you asked for with logging set to 10. I would expect that a Windows machine should be able to access a public share on the Samba server without the clear text password hack being applied (it always worked fine with Samba 2.x and share mode security) so the tar file No-Encrypted_PWD.tar has the logs for this instance. >From the client machine I tried to map the share \\172.30.50.247\nt (which is public) and the error that I got back on the laptop was the one that you would get to indicate that you need to apply the encrypted password hack to the machine. This should not happen, the machine should be able to map the drive without the encrypted password hack or supplying a username/password. For completeness, I then installed the encrypted password hack on the Windows client and performed the same connection with a fresh set of logfiles. This time it came straight back with a password dialog box (wrong behaviour) so I entered in guest as the username with no password and it came back with the password dialog box again It seems that others on the Internet have mentioned that guest access does not work for user mode authentications so it seems not to be just me although it surprises me that such a fundamental feature seems to be flawed??? Any advice that you can offer would be gladly received. Regards Gary Mansell On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 07:24 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mansell, Gary wrote: > > > If a user (who does not have a login account on the > > Samba server) tries to map a guest share, the user gets > > presented with a login dialog asking for a password > > for the Guest account - how can I just allow access > > without the user being asked for a password? > > Gary, Please send me a level 10 debug log from smbd > with the failed login and failed guest access. > Thanks. > > > > > cheers, jerry > = > Samba--- http://www.samba.org > Centeris --- http://www.centeris.com > "What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFGZ/jlIR7qMdg1EfYRAulhAJ40LsFB8YRKrTtAUtpQEa/Td1xnDACfToPB > HGWbpxOjOrgJ9NhST8C9bkg= > =1Waw > -END PGP SIGNATURE- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail from your system.Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ricardo (save for reports and other documentation formally approved and signed for release to the intended recipient).Only Directors are authorised to enter into legally binding obligations on behalf of Ricardo. Ricardo may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give consent to such monitoring.The recipient should check e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. Ricardo accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. "Ricardo" means Ricardo plc and its subsidiary companies. Ricardo plc is a public limited company registered in England with registered number 00222915. The registered office of Ricardo plc is Shoreham Technical Centre, Shoreham-by Sea, West Sussex, BN43 5FG. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba topography question joining with ADS?
I have the current situation and am trying to figure out which way is the best approach. Our organization has two domains, REMOTE and LOCAL REMOTE - remotely located Active Directory, Windows 2003 LOCAL - local Samba 3.0.x, Linux server I have computer labs and students that would like to login to REMOTE and also local accounts that need LOCAL. There is no way to have a WinXP station belong to two domains. So... If we moved everything onto the REMOTE domain, could Samba be setup with tdbsam or LDAP and windbind to authenticate local accounts, with a local home directory and local roaming profile while also allowing students to login via windbind and connect to their remote home and profile? I have tried this but have so far not had any success. I have a Kerberos ticket and have joined the Samba machine to REMOTE. I can then connect a WINXP station to remote and login. I can even set the home directory in AD to the local Samba machine which works. What doesn't work. 1) Local accounts - can't get Samba to authenticate a local account. Are local accounts possible in this situation? -- George Farris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Malaspina University-College As with the rail barons of the past: "There is no reason why the computer industry should have to put up with 'private standards' any longer. The word 'incompatible' is a dirty word. It's time to run those who insist on using it out of the business." -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] idealx-smbtools gone?
Andreas Paulick dijo: > I'm looking for the idealx-smbtools. Okay this is written in every > other mail in this list - pointing to samba.idealx.org. But there is no > server. Even www.idealx.org is redirected to www.opentrust.org. As you > can see there, there is a bottom line with idealx, but as far as i can > see, no smbtools. > Does anyone knows a valid source? Am I blind, looking for trees while > standing in a forrest? You can go to their sourceforge page and download from there[1], or you can take it from some distribution. In Debian you have the original sources[2] and the .deb package. [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/smbldap-tools/ [2] http://packages.debian.org/smbldap-tools Good luck! -- Asier. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Profile deleted
Mario Gzuk wrote: > Hi, > strange things or normal behavior? We have a samba domain and > "Domain-guests" accounts that are limited to log on to only some > machines, on this machines the "Domain-guests" are in the lokal admin > group. ... > 3.) log on again with this "Domain-guests" account -> all data and all > settings are gone. I was not able to find any of the files stored in > this account (under "Documents and Settings") and all settings are set > to the default. > > Is this normal? Yes, Guest account profiles are not persistent (ie, reset on every login). -- Rex -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: samba Digest, Vol 54, Issue 23
Hello, I am out of the office from Thursday June 14th until Tuesday June 26th. I will get back to you as soon as I can. Thanks, ~Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.24 on AIX 5.3 + winbindd
Hey,
I forgot to mention that I'm not using AD yet. So LDAP & Kerberos is not
important to me, right now - since I'm still using a NT4-Domain :(
Should I use another/older Samba version for my configuration?
Thanks,
Axel
Info wrote:
> Alex,
> I've installed 3.0.25a on AIX 5.3 and am getting issues with adding samba
> server
> into W2003 AD, can you assist ?
>
> I got my 3.0.25a binaries from samba site, where did you get yours ?
> Do I need a pam_winbind.conf file ?
>
> I'd appreciate any help ?
>
>
> here is what I' doing to add samba server in W2003 AD
> # rm /opt/pware/samba/3.0.25a/private/secrets.tdb
> # rm /opt/pware/samba/3.0.25a/var/locks/*.tdb
> # ntpdate 10.1.1.101
> 20 Jun 12:06:03 ntpdate[14830]: adjust time server 10.1.1.101 offset -0.003558
> # cd /opt/pware/bin
> # ./kinit
> Password for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # ./klist
> Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0
> Default principal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Valid starting ExpiresService principal
> 06/20/07 12:05:20 06/20/07 18:45:20 krbtgt/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Kerberos 4 ticket cache: /tmp/tkt0
> klist: You have no tickets cached
> # cd /opt/pware/samba/3.0.25a/bin
> # ./net --debuglevel=10 ads join
>
> fyi smb.conf and krb5.conf
>
>
>
> KRB5.conf
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [libdefaults]
>
>
>
> ticket_lifetime = 24000
>
>
>
> default_realm = CLPSRES.LOCAL
>
>
>
> forwardable = true
>
>
>
> proxiable = true
>
>
>
> dns_lookup_realm = false
>
>
>
> dns_lookup_kdc = false
>
>
>
> [realms]
>
>
>
> CLPSRES.LOCAL = {
>
>
>
> default_domain = domain.com
>
>
>
> kdc = 10.1.1.101:88
>
>
>
>admin_server = 10.1.1.101:749
>
>
>
> }
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [domain_realm]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> .domain.com = CLPSRES.LOCAL
>
>
>
> domain.com = CLPSRES.LOCAL
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> smb.conf
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> # Samba config file created using SWAT
>
>
>
> # from 10.1.1.101 (10.1.1.101)
>
>
>
> # Date: 2007/06/18 16:09:28
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [global]
>
>
>
> workgroup = CLPSRES
>
>
>
> realm = CLPSRES.LOCAL
>
>
>
> security = ADS
>
>
>
> auth methods = winbind
>
>
>
> obey pam restrictions = Yes
>
>
>
> password server = 10.1.1.101
>
>
>
> log level = 8
>
>
>
> log file = /var/log/samba.log
>
>
>
> client signing = Yes
>
>
>
> ldap suffix = "dc=CLPSRES,dc=LOCAL"
>
>
>
> ldap ssl = no
>
>
>
> idmap uid = 15000-2
>
>
>
> idmap gid = 15000-2
>
>
>
> template homedir =
>
>
>
> winbind separator = +
>
>
>
> winbind enum users = Yes
>
>
>
> winbind enum groups = Yes
>
>
>
> winbind use default domain = Yes
>
>
>
> admin users = root
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [public]
>
>
>
> comment = test
>
>
>
> path = /usr/local/source
>
>
>
> read only = No
>
>
>
> on 22/6/07 9:21 AM, Axel Schmalowsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I installed Samba 3.0.24 on my AIX 5.3 and configured it to authenticate
>> users via winbind.
>> I followed the previous thread 'Samba on AIX --> nsswitch.conf', copied
>> WINBIND to /usr/lib/security and modified the default: stanza in
>> /etc/security/user to include WINBIND (in the SYSTEM and registry entry,
>> respectively). Additionally, I added an entry in
>> /usr/lib/security/methods.cfg.
>>
>> I succeeded in getting the Domain users name by means of 'wbinfo -u',
>> but I cannot list any user via 'lsuser -R WINBIND ...' nor do I get any
>> information about a user via 'id user' - it tells me that the user
>> specified cannot be found in /etc/passwd.
>>
>> Is there anything I have not done or considered yet?
>>
>> Any help appreciated.
>>
>> Regards
>> Axel
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3.0.24 on AIX 5.3 + winbindd
Hello, I installed Samba 3.0.24 on my AIX 5.3 and configured it to authenticate users via winbind. I followed the previous thread 'Samba on AIX --> nsswitch.conf', copied WINBIND to /usr/lib/security and modified the default: stanza in /etc/security/user to include WINBIND (in the SYSTEM and registry entry, respectively). Additionally, I added an entry in /usr/lib/security/methods.cfg. I succeeded in getting the Domain users name by means of 'wbinfo -u', but I cannot list any user via 'lsuser -R WINBIND ...' nor do I get any information about a user via 'id user' - it tells me that the user specified cannot be found in /etc/passwd. Is there anything I have not done or considered yet? Any help appreciated. Regards Axel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
