[Samba] Changing samba PDC version but keeping the same IP address
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello We are facing a bit boring problem We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11 as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC IP address on several hundreds of windows XP clients we have chosen to keep the same IP address for the new PDC. The problem is windows clients does not update the name of network drives and keep the old names even connected to the new PDC server and it's new shares ... I suspect there are some caching mechanisms that are not completely cleaned (!!!) by windows. Any infos on how to clean widows caches are welcome. Thanks -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkoneusACgkQ6f7UMO5oSsVzqwCgj5NxAHLneeNybWmif7msv1sn wZ0AoJ0FTmj8fAon0lq7/rL16yNPtdp8 =7H8F -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Make CIFS look like NFS
Hello, And if you want some unix-like features on top, make sure unix extensions is set to yes. But be careful with that and test it beforehand on all systems (different operating systems I mean). It can sometimes break little things for Mac/Win. Regards, Michal 2009/6/3 Brian Krusic br...@krusic.com: You can have an NFS mount on your Nix box like /JOBS/stuff and a CIFS mount on XP like \\JOBS\stuff. In this case, JOBS is the Samba server name. This is how I maintain the same paths in scripts on diff platforms. Al you have to ensure is that your app will obey UNC paths so that a drive letter is never saved out in the file. - Brian On Jun 3, 2009, at 11:38 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Is it possible to make CIFS look like NFS via some configuration/mount options? What I mean is, from a client point of view, will the mounted share behave EXACTLY like NFS will? -- Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Changing samba PDC version but keeping the same IP address
Frank Bonnet schrieb: We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11 as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC IP address on several hundreds of windows XP clients we have chosen to keep the same IP address for the new PDC. Why you use IPs on the client instead of names? Here we resolve everything by Wins/DNS. So no need for using IPs. The problem is windows clients does not update the name of network drives and keep the old names even connected to the new PDC server and it's new shares ... You mean the name of the server or from the shares? If you keep the IP you can also name the new server as the old one (what I would suggest). And if the shares also keep their names, nothing changes out of client sight. How are the shares connected? If you use a logon script, you can change this. Just disconnect all old shares before you map it. And if the shares are mapped with /PERSISTENT:NO, they are automatically disconnected after logoff. And don't forget to set the domain SID of the new server to the one of your old server. Otherwise your clients doesn't accept the new server as PDC for the domain, even if the domain name is the same. Regards, Marc -- Marc Muehlfeld (Leitung IT) Zentrum fuer Humangenetik und Laboratoriumsmedizin Dr. Klein und Dr. Rost Lochhamer Str. 29 - D-82152 Martinsried Telefon: +49(0)89/895578-0 - Fax: +49(0)89/895578-780 http://www.medizinische-genetik.de -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Changing samba PDC version but keeping the same IP address
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marc Muehlfeld wrote: Frank Bonnet schrieb: We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11 as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC IP address on several hundreds of windows XP clients we have chosen to keep the same IP address for the new PDC. Why you use IPs on the client instead of names? Here we resolve everything by Wins/DNS. So no need for using IPs. The problem is windows clients does not update the name of network drives and keep the old names even connected to the new PDC server and it's new shares ... You mean the name of the server or from the shares? If you keep the IP you can also name the new server as the old one (what I would suggest). And if the shares also keep their names, nothing changes out of client sight. it is the case How are the shares connected? If you use a logon script, you can change this. Just disconnect all old shares before you map it. And if the shares are mapped with /PERSISTENT:NO, they are automatically disconnected after logoff. OK I'm gonna try this And don't forget to set the domain SID of the new server to the one of your old server. Otherwise your clients doesn't accept the new server as PDC for the domain, even if the domain name is the same. Of course the SID is the same Regards, Marc Thanks a lot for your help. Frank -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkonhsIACgkQ6f7UMO5oSsW3FgCghWvvEQi/MKZDE9IfgMkjWt4G v1kAn06s7EbLxTx5UgDszicB4Utf7O/4 =betF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Having problems with Samba and openLDAP Groups
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Liutauras Adomaitis liutauras.adomai...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Matt Burkhardt m...@imparisystems.com wrote: On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 23:29 +0300, Liutauras Adomaitis wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Matt Burkhardt m...@imparisystems.com wrote: Thanks for the help! I appreciate you taking the time! On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 00:02 +0300, Liutauras Adomaitis wrote: [2009/05/27 13:34:52, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(616) user 'mlb' (from session setup) not permitted to access this share (Staff) [2009/05/27 13:34:52, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet_set(106) error packet at smbd/reply.c(514) cmd=117 (SMBtconX) NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED i guess your user mib is not in group @Staff. What do you get with commands: smbldap-tools works only with ldap, it doesn't mean system sees those users. id mib getent passwd | grep mib getent group | grep -i staff id mlb uid=1000(mlb) gid=1000(mlb) groups=1000(mlb),4(adm),20(dialout),24(cdrom),25(floppy),29(audio),30(dip),33(www-data),44(video),46(plugdev),107(fuse),113(lpadmin),115(admin),116(sambashare),1001(musicshare),1002(printer-admin),1008(subversion),1012(Staff),513(Domain Users),1014(Staff) getent passwd | grep mlb mlb:x:1000:1000:Matt Burkhardt,,,:/home/mlb:/bin/bash mlb:x:1009:544:mlb:/home/mlb:/bin/bash mlb-laptop$:*:1014:515:Computer:/dev/null:/bin/false getent group | grep -i Staff staff:x:50: Staff:x:1012:alex,mlb Staff:*:1014:mlb,alex You have 3 groups Staff and 2 users mib. This confuses me a bit. It may be your problem. I think you should have only one user mib. You should also make sure you have 1 group Staff. Check your net groupmap list to see how does Staff group maps to windows group. Liutauras Those are deleted entries - they don't show up in either the webmin module or phpldapadmin. Here's the results from the net groupmap list Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-3529111891-2609867799-3129462049-512) - Domain Admins Domain Users (S-1-5-21-3529111891-2609867799-3129462049-513) - Domain Users Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-3529111891-2609867799-3129462049-514) - Domain Guests Domain Computers (S-1-5-21-3529111891-2609867799-3129462049-515) - Domain Computers Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) - Administrators Account Operators (S-1-5-32-548) - Account Operators Print Operators (S-1-5-32-550) - Print Operators Backup Operators (S-1-5-32-551) - Backup Operators Replicators (S-1-5-32-552) - Replicators Staff (S-1-5-21-3529111891-2609867799-3129462049-3029) - Staff Hi, have you solved your problem? I've been busy a bit. You groupmap list looks nice, but I still think there is something to dig arround group membership. Some more things to check, if you didn't do that already: - smbldap-groupshow Staff - this should give an idea of gidNumber and SID of Staff group in ldap - do you run nscd? I had a lot of problems with it and ldap authentication. Samba Docs even say, that this is not supported if I remmeber correctly. nscd could be responsible of showing groups that are already deleted. - have tried using other group, like Domain Users. If it works with other group then it is problem with your group Staff. Liutauras PS one more thing to do nss_updatedb ldap group staff - this should refresh group memberships. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] all connections closed if user gives wrong pwd (#long posting inside)
reply to my own post: a little bit of more research on the server side and reading cifs documentation let me point out the problem: cifs.ko starts a thread (cifsd) for each connection to a server. this thread is killed if a user gives a wrong password which means every mounted cifs-share is gone. $ echo 1 /proc/fs/cifs/cifsFYI#gives good information after doing what was described in my last post. dmesg | grep kill fs/cifs/connect.c: cifsd thread killed so this means it is not related to samba but to the cifs module. hope this helps anyone. br thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Problem with Mac OS X Clients
Hi, I have installed a Debian / Lenny with Samba 3.2.5 and put it in an existing Domain. All works fine. I can Authenticate the Users and and give them permissions to write while I connect from a Windows- or Linux-Client. When I`m conecting from an Mac OS X Client and create a new Folder, the Permission is always 755. (from other clients 770) my smb.conf: [global] security = domain workgroup = XXX netbios name = file-server01 encrypt passwords = yes log level = 2 [test] path = /daten/test browseable = yes writeable = yes valid users = @mygroup create mask = 0660 directory mask = 0770 I also tried to create an own PDC (samba with ldap) and I have the same problems. Can anybody help me, or had anybody the same problems? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Problem with Mac OS X Clients
Hi, I have installed a Debian / Lenny with Samba 3.2.5 and put it in an existing Domain. All works fine. I can Authenticate the Users and and give them permissions to write while I connect from a Windows- or Linux-Client. When I`m conecting from an Mac OS X Client and create a new Folder, the Permission is always 755. (from other clients 770) my smb.conf: [global] security = domain workgroup = XXX netbios name = file-server01 encrypt passwords = yes log level = 2 [test] path = /daten/test browseable = yes writeable = yes valid users = @mygroup create mask = 0660 directory mask = 0770 I also tried to create an own PDC (samba with ldap) and I have the same problems. Can anybody help me, or had anybody the same problems? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Problem with Mac OS X Clients
Try force directory security mode = 0770 best regards, Johannes Am 04.06.2009 13:26, schrieb Christian Wernitz: Hi, I have installed a Debian / Lenny with Samba 3.2.5 and put it in an existing Domain. All works fine. I can Authenticate the Users and and give them permissions to write while I connect from a Windows- or Linux-Client. When I`m conecting from an Mac OS X Client and create a new Folder, the Permission is always 755. (from other clients 770) my smb.conf: [global] security = domain workgroup = XXX netbios name = file-server01 encrypt passwords = yes log level = 2 [test] path = /daten/test browseable = yes writeable = yes valid users = @mygroup create mask = 0660 directory mask = 0770 I also tried to create an own PDC (samba with ldap) and I have the same problems. Can anybody help me, or had anybody the same problems? -- |- | weberhofer GmbH | Johannes Weberhofer | information technologies | Austria, 1080 Wien, Blindengasse 52/3 | | Firmenbuch: 225566s, Handelsgericht Wien | UID: ATU55277701 | | phone : +43 (0)1 5454421 0| email: off...@weberhofer.at | fax : +43 (0)1 5454421 19 | web : http://weberhofer.at | mobile: +43 (0)699 11998315 |--- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Changing samba PDC version but keeping the same IP address
Frank Bonnet wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello We are facing a bit boring problem We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11 as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC IP address on several hundreds of windows XP clients we have chosen to keep the same IP address for the new PDC. The problem is windows clients does not update the name of network drives and keep the old names even connected to the new PDC server and it's new shares ... I suspect there are some caching mechanisms that are not completely cleaned (!!!) by windows. Any infos on how to clean widows caches are welcome. If I understand you correctly, you mean everything is working just fine, but the server name displayed in file explorer for the network drive letter is still the old server name. If that's it, check the registry: [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\ComputerDescriptions] Delete the entries for the server it will automatically refresh to the current setting. -- tkb -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Problem with Mac OS X Clients
Yes, it work! Thank you!!! Am 04.06.2009 um 13:35 schrieb ee...@welho.com: Try to set unix extensions = No in smb.conf -- Eero Quoting Christian Wernitz christian.wern...@kontrast.de: Hi, I have installed a Debian / Lenny with Samba 3.2.5 and put it in an existing Domain. All works fine. I can Authenticate the Users and and give them permissions to write while I connect from a Windows- or Linux-Client. When I`m conecting from an Mac OS X Client and create a new Folder, the Permission is always 755. (from other clients 770) my smb.conf: [global] security = domain workgroup = XXX netbios name = file-server01 encrypt passwords = yes log level = 2 [test] path = /daten/test browseable = yes writeable = yes valid users = @mygroup create mask = 0660 directory mask = 0770 I also tried to create an own PDC (samba with ldap) and I have the same problems. Can anybody help me, or had anybody the same problems? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Winbind Problems resolving groups
Hello, on my member server I only see the mapped GID through winbind on my filesystem. Owner are displayed fine. Only the group isnt resolved. Access is possible because the GIDs are fine. Example: -rw-r--r-- 1 muehlfeld 30006 429 26. Aug 2008 testfile.txt wbinfo -g returns: BUILTIN\administrators BUILTIN\users The member server is running 3.3.4. Also the PDC runs 3.3.4 (with 3.0.34 on my PDC it worked). Any idea? Regards, Marc -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Make CIFS look like NFS
Michal Dobroczynski wrote: Hi Daniel, Can you specify what NFS features are important to you in such case? (in other words please define look like NFS) Regards, Michal Oh - you want me to be specific? What fun would that be? ;-) Ok, specifics... I'm trying to run an IMAP mail server (Dovecot) in a virtual machine. However, I do not want the messages stored within the virtual disk. So - the question was how the virtual machine could access those files. Dovecot has been setup and tested with NFS. However, when I asked about compatibility with CIFS, I was told it would probably not work. Testing on my own showed that in fact that this resulted in problems - it appeared temp files would be created and never deleted. I tried a few different smb.conf mount parameters that SEEMED appropriate - but wasn't able to get it to work. So... I guess my specific question would be how can I setup CIFS so Dovecot will work with it as happily as it does with NFS? -- Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Make CIFS look like NFS
Hello, Thanks for the details - they really change completely the whole background ;) Anyway, there's not much I can help in such situation - but see my comments below. Maybe they will help (convince?) in some way. 2009/6/4 Daniel L. Miller dmil...@amfes.com: Michal Dobroczynski wrote: Hi Daniel, Can you specify what NFS features are important to you in such case? (in other words please define look like NFS) Regards, Michal Oh - you want me to be specific? What fun would that be? ;-) Ok, specifics... I'm trying to run an IMAP mail server (Dovecot) in a virtual machine. However, I do not want the messages stored within the virtual disk. So - the question was how the virtual machine could access those files. Dovecot has been setup and tested with NFS. However, when I asked about compatibility with CIFS, I was told it would probably not work. Testing on my own showed that in fact that this resulted in problems - it appeared temp files would be created and never deleted. I tried a few different smb.conf mount parameters that SEEMED appropriate - but wasn't able to get it to work. So... I am not aware of possible issues (fs calls circus) apart from using : in file names: smb: \mico\ put test:test putting file test:test as \mico\test:test (0,0 kb/s) (average 0,0 kb/s) smb: \mico\ ls . D0 Thu Jun 4 19:48:34 2009 .. D0 Thu Jun 4 19:48:29 2009 TLNVL5~P 0 Thu Jun 4 19:48:40 2009 I guess my specific question would be how can I setup CIFS so Dovecot will work with it as happily as it does with NFS? I think you will have to change your requirements and consider NFS instead of CIFS :( Regards, Michal -- Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] samba file server with heartbeat and drbd
Hello, While working on heartbeat/pacemaker for a web service stored on drbd, I've thought what I've learnt could also be applied to samba in order to build a fault tolerant file server in our domain. While digging samba's doc, I've found that CTDB could also fulfill the need and is maybe better suited as it's samba-related. But on the other hand, I'd appreciate to begin with only samba + pacemaker + drbd. I guess that failover would be less transparent to the users but I'm not really aware of what bad things could occur during a failover. Could anyone enlighten me on this matter ? Regards, -- Mikael Kermorgant -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] samba file server with heartbeat and drbd
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Mikael Kermorgant mikael.kermorg...@gmail.com wrote: While working on heartbeat/pacemaker for a web service stored on drbd, I've thought what I've learnt could also be applied to samba in order to build a fault tolerant file server in our domain. While digging samba's doc, I've found that CTDB could also fulfill the need and is maybe better suited as it's samba-related. These things don't have to be mutually exclusive. ctdb still relies on a file and lock coherent clustered filesystem, and that filesystem might even require heartbeat or pacemaker (e.g. ocfs2, gfs). But on the other hand, I'd appreciate to begin with only samba + pacemaker + drbd. I guess that failover would be less transparent to the users but I'm not really aware of what bad things could occur during a failover. Could anyone enlighten me on this matter ? In the non-ctdb case, if you are using sync drbd (if you are using async, good luck), it would appear as if the server rebooted extremely quickly, and every client would have to re-establish connections (and open files, obtain locks, etc). Perhaps the biggest real risk is that your standby wasn't actually working, and you didn't know it, because it was always in standby. In the ctdb case, only the connections to that node would see the disconnection, so fewer connections would have to be re-established. Also, each server would already be in a known working state, so you wouldn't be wondering if that standby was really ready to take over. The benefits of ctdb go well beyond that, however -- Jim McDonough Samba Team jmcd at samba dot org jmcd at themcdonoughs dot org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] OSX causing multiple CLOSE_WAIT's
Brian, Thanks. I thought I was just my two OS clients. From what I've been reading lately, it seems to have been around for a while in different releases of OSX. Our set up is one Samba PDC that acts as a file server for a bookkeeping business. We have the mac machines as we have a couple of artist clients who do all their work on Macs, including their books. We can't leave them connected to the network for too long or I have to restart samba. I did an strace and logged it here - http://www.wrenkasky.com/reports/mac_strace.txt I am not sure what to look for though. Maybe someone can shed some light... Ed On 2009-06-03, 17:29:04 Brian Krusic wrote: Hi Ed, First, I feel your pain. While I don't have an answer, I did switch from OSX based Samba server to Linux and my problems went away. My experience in general with OSX server 10.5 is that its a horrible XSAN, NFS, AFP, SMB server. What I've used to help trouble shoot OSX in general in addition to the built in process viewer is XRG ( X Resource Grapher). You can also try to dtrace stuff. Just type it in a term to see some help. There were some NFS bugs I uncovered and shared with the OSX Server dev guys which should be fixed in 10.6 server but who knows if that will also fix the plethora of other issues. - Brian On Jun 2, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Ed Kasky wrote: Lately it never fails when I attach a Mac running OSX 10.5 that I get runaway pid's. I tracked them down so far to multiple close_wait's: # /usr/sbin/lsof | grep pbg5mac smbd 24876 root6u IPv4 80015755 TCP yoda.wrenkasky.com:netbios-ssn-pbg5mac.wrenkasky.com:49381 (CLOSE_WAIT) They can grow to over 100 if I don't catch it or nobody can log on anymore ;-) Anybody had any problems with Macs using samba? ... Randomly Generated Quote (1505 of 1543): Words have a longer life than deeds. -- Pindar -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Timeout Waiting For SAMBA Response
A number of applications across multiple servers are showing these types of errors :- FileMove: TLFSO.MoveFile: TLFSO.CopyFile: File copy failed on 'e:\Output Data\Scaleouts\A-005301.RDY' - The filename, directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect. Taking them all into account, I feel the file system lookup is timing out waiting for SAMBA to come back. This started happening when I moved a heavy application (directory list every second) from A/S to SAMBA yesterday. The files are on an ODS-2 volume, so I can certainly move them to ODS-5 to try and help performance. I also noticed that each attempt to list the directories creates a new VMS process. Are there any tips to improve the process login speed or make the connection persistent? Rob. *** Any opinions expressed in email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of the company. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient or entity to whom they are addressed. It may contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. Random House Group + 44 (0) 20 7840 8400 http://www.randomhouse.co.uk http://www.booksattransworld.co.uk http://www.kidsatrandomhouse.co.uk Generic email address - enquir...@randomhouse.co.uk Name Registered Office: THE RANDOM HOUSE GROUP LIMITED 20 VAUXHALL BRIDGE ROAD LONDON SW1V 2SA Random House Group Ltd is registered in the United Kingdom with company No. 00954009, VAT number 102838980 *** PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated - release-4-0-0alpha7-2027-gd0aedeb
The branch, master has been updated via d0aedeb46e5d2da582b5c030114186f8d755b528 (commit) from c6f39b46a7b0505331612a1bee15a82f97009f0d (commit) http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log - commit d0aedeb46e5d2da582b5c030114186f8d755b528 Author: Volker Lendecke v...@samba.org Date: Thu Jun 4 17:48:17 2009 +0200 Increase tevent version for tevent_req_notify_callback() --- Summary of changes: lib/tevent/configure.ac |2 +- source4/min_versions.m4 |2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Changeset truncated at 500 lines: diff --git a/lib/tevent/configure.ac b/lib/tevent/configure.ac index 1c62a70..0d3f21d 100644 --- a/lib/tevent/configure.ac +++ b/lib/tevent/configure.ac @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ AC_PREREQ(2.50) -AC_INIT(tevent, 0.9.5) +AC_INIT(tevent, 0.9.6) AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([tevent.c]) AC_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h) diff --git a/source4/min_versions.m4 b/source4/min_versions.m4 index 76bc1fe..0d9f439 100644 --- a/source4/min_versions.m4 +++ b/source4/min_versions.m4 @@ -3,4 +3,4 @@ define(TDB_MIN_VERSION,1.1.4) define(TALLOC_MIN_VERSION,1.3.0) define(LDB_REQUIRED_VERSION,0.9.5) -define(TEVENT_REQUIRED_VERSION,0.9.5) +define(TEVENT_REQUIRED_VERSION,0.9.6) -- Samba Shared Repository
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated - release-4-0-0alpha7-2029-g9f94c40
The branch, master has been updated via 9f94c408851505a5eb2d5fbf4b0ac37ff0b0e037 (commit) from e53ca4845e123eeff5e29869995e4a1a455f5f5d (commit) http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log - commit 9f94c408851505a5eb2d5fbf4b0ac37ff0b0e037 Author: Kai Blin k...@samba.org Date: Thu Jun 4 20:14:28 2009 +0200 nsstest: Relicense header file to LGPLv3+ --- Summary of changes: nsswitch/nsstest.h | 20 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Changeset truncated at 500 lines: diff --git a/nsswitch/nsstest.h b/nsswitch/nsstest.h index e69f17c..53adce5 100644 --- a/nsswitch/nsstest.h +++ b/nsswitch/nsstest.h @@ -3,17 +3,21 @@ nss includes for the nss tester Copyright (C) Kai Blin 2007 - This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify - it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by - the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or - (at your option) any later version. + ** NOTE! The following LGPL license applies to the nsstest + ** header. This does NOT imply that all of Samba is released + ** under the LGPL - This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or + modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public + License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either + version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. + + This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of - MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the - GNU General Public License for more details. + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU + Library General Public License for more details. - You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License + You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License along with this program. If not, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/. */ -- Samba Shared Repository
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated - release-4-0-0alpha7-2033-g73e3c85
The branch, master has been updated
via 73e3c85abac706be0a1836f3a4375ab379eceb86 (commit)
from 930ea7c8a8879e98826ffdc391bab8b5a2864c5f (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit 73e3c85abac706be0a1836f3a4375ab379eceb86
Author: Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org
Date: Thu Jun 4 12:47:17 2009 -0700
Change smbd_smb2_request_error() to add a __location__.
This allows quick identification of smb2 parsing errors.
Jeremy.
---
Summary of changes:
source3/include/smb_macros.h |3 +++
source3/smbd/globals.h |7 +++
source3/smbd/smb2_server.c | 13 +++--
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Changeset truncated at 500 lines:
diff --git a/source3/include/smb_macros.h b/source3/include/smb_macros.h
index 7528883..6dd9cab 100644
--- a/source3/include/smb_macros.h
+++ b/source3/include/smb_macros.h
@@ -339,4 +339,7 @@ extern const char toupper_ascii_fast_table[];
#define toupper_ascii_fast(c) toupper_ascii_fast_table[(unsigned int)(c)];
#endif
+#define smbd_smb2_request_error(req, status) \
+ smbd_smb2_request_error_((req), (status), __location__)
+
#endif /* _SMB_MACROS_H */
diff --git a/source3/smbd/globals.h b/source3/smbd/globals.h
index 1c2b628..4c90e8f 100644
--- a/source3/smbd/globals.h
+++ b/source3/smbd/globals.h
@@ -176,10 +176,9 @@ void reply_smb2002(struct smb_request *req, uint16_t
choice);
void smbd_smb2_first_negprot(struct smbd_server_connection *conn,
const uint8_t *inbuf, size_t size);
-NTSTATUS smbd_smb2_request_error_ex(struct smbd_smb2_request *req,
- NTSTATUS status, DATA_BLOB *info);
-NTSTATUS smbd_smb2_request_error(struct smbd_smb2_request *req,
-NTSTATUS status);
+NTSTATUS smbd_smb2_request_error_(struct smbd_smb2_request *req,
+NTSTATUS status,
+const char *wherestr);
NTSTATUS smbd_smb2_request_done_ex(struct smbd_smb2_request *req,
NTSTATUS status,
DATA_BLOB body, DATA_BLOB *dyn);
diff --git a/source3/smbd/smb2_server.c b/source3/smbd/smb2_server.c
index 20754fb..5c4bdca 100644
--- a/source3/smbd/smb2_server.c
+++ b/source3/smbd/smb2_server.c
@@ -583,16 +583,17 @@ static void smbd_smb2_request_writev_done(struct
tevent_req *subreq)
talloc_free(mem_pool);
}
-NTSTATUS smbd_smb2_request_error_ex(struct smbd_smb2_request *req,
+static NTSTATUS smbd_smb2_request_error_ex(struct smbd_smb2_request *req,
NTSTATUS status,
+ const char *wherestr,
DATA_BLOB *info)
{
uint8_t *outhdr;
uint8_t *outbody;
int i = req-current_idx;
- DEBUG(10,(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[%d] status[%s]%s\n,
- i, nt_errstr(status), info ? +info : ));
+ DEBUG(10,(smbd_smb2_request_error_ex: idx[%d] status[%s] at %s |%s|\n,
+ i, nt_errstr(status), wherestr, info ? +info : ));
outhdr = (uint8_t *)req-out.vector[i].iov_base;
@@ -619,10 +620,10 @@ NTSTATUS smbd_smb2_request_error_ex(struct
smbd_smb2_request *req,
return smbd_smb2_request_reply(req);
}
-NTSTATUS smbd_smb2_request_error(struct smbd_smb2_request *req,
-NTSTATUS status)
+NTSTATUS smbd_smb2_request_error_(struct smbd_smb2_request *req,
+NTSTATUS status, const char *wherestr)
{
- return smbd_smb2_request_error_ex(req, status, NULL);
+ return smbd_smb2_request_error_ex(req, status, wherestr, NULL);
}
NTSTATUS smbd_smb2_request_done_ex(struct smbd_smb2_request *req,
--
Samba Shared Repository
