Re: [Samba] Samba + Winbind + Windows 2003 AD
Hi Henrik, I am also fighting with Winbind for a few days now experiencing some weird behaviour. Regarding your explanation I assume you have SFU running in your AD Domain. Do you really have a RFC2307 complaint schema in AD or do you still stick to SFU schema? For debugging the winbind it was helpful to me to start it in a shell as a foreground process with debugging on, e. g. /usr/sbin/winbindd -SFi -d3 Now you should be able to see the different Winbind behaviour regarding the login and getent. Good luck. Tobias Mucke LFK-Lenkflugkörpersysteme GmbH Serverpool, FCI4 Landshuter Straße 26, 85716 Unterschleißheim, GERMANY Phone: +49 89 3179 8438 Fax: +49 89 3179 8927 Mobile: +49 170 635 3830 E-Mail: tobias.mu...@mbda-systems.de http://www.mbda.net Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Antoine Bouvier Managing Director: Werner Kaltenegger Registered Office: Schrobenhausen Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Ingolstadt, HRB 4365 -Original Message- From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Henrik Dige Semark Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 1:35 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] Samba + Winbind + Windows 2003 AD Hey out there. I have to join my UNIX server with an existing Win2k3 AD network. My system info: Debian Lenny Samba - 3.4.8 Winbind - 3.4.8 Windows Server 2003 with 2000-style-AD My problem is that, I have en UNIX server that have to run auth up against our existing windows 2003 AD. I have successfully joined my UNIX server to the AD, without problems. # net ads join -U Administrator Enter Administrator's password: Using short domain name -- TEST Joined 'MAIL' to realm 'TEST.LOCAL' My Samba config: http://pastebin.com/ZqaA0Ypn After the join I'm able to lookup peoples with # wbinfo -u [...] XX hds XXX [...] # wbinfo -g [...] bg XX bg hds bg XXX [...] Now the problem, getent only returns the local users and not the users from the AD The funny thing is that if a user is local on the UNIX and in the AD, I can login with the password from both local and AD, so I know that it can lookup people and passwords # getent passwd hs ; echo $? 2 When I debug on getent it returns 2, witch means that it can't find the user. I know there can be a problem with this if the resolv-names is not working # ping addc.UNDERVISNING.LOCAL PING addc.birke-gym.dk (10.3.17.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from bgdc.birke-gym.dk (10.3.17.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=0.211 ms 64 bytes from bgdc.birke-gym.dk (10.3.17.1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=0.207 ms # ping mail.UNDERVISNING.LOCAL PING mail.birke-gym.dk (127.0.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from mail.birke-gym.dk (127.0.1.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.099 ms 64 bytes from mail.birke-gym.dk (127.0.1.1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.094 ms Is there anyone that can see where I have done something rung in my samba-config.? -- Med Venlig Hilsen / Best Regards Henrik Dige Semark -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Compiling and installing Samba 4
I have Samba 3.4.7 configured and running, though I am interested in trying Samba 4. How can I find dependency information for compiling the code? Also, can I install Samba 4 and leave v3.4.7 intact while I evaluate it? Derek -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Access from an AD group
Hi, I am using samba 3.0.24 Is it possible to grant access to a samba share to an Active Directory group ? I have a samba share, I want an AD group can access it (read) without a password, is it possible ? Thanks for your help -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba + Winbind + Windows 2003 AD
Hi Tobias To be honest I don't really know that mutch about the Windows AD, I'm not an Windows guy, when I talked with the Windows AD Administrator he told my that it was an RFC2307 schema and not an old SFU, but I have just now logged on to the AD server and it doesn't seams like any schemas is loaded at all. My winbind debugging: http://pastebin.com/WjDRvp8q Winbind debugging while getent passwd USER: http://pastebin.com/0B24yePY I don't know way there is a lot of UVROOT.LOCAL, my server is only joined to UNDERVISNING.LOCAL, but the windows AD server do know UVROOT also. -- Med Venlig Hilsen / Best Regards Henrik Dige Semark Den 18-07-2010 08:58, Mucke, Tobias, FCI4 skrev: Hi Henrik, I am also fighting with Winbind for a few days now experiencing some weird behaviour. Regarding your explanation I assume you have SFU running in your AD Domain. Do you really have a RFC2307 complaint schema in AD or do you still stick to SFU schema? For debugging the winbind it was helpful to me to start it in a shell as a foreground process with debugging on, e. g. /usr/sbin/winbindd -SFi -d3 Now you should be able to see the different Winbind behaviour regarding the login and getent. Good luck. Tobias Mucke LFK-Lenkflugkörpersysteme GmbH Serverpool, FCI4 Landshuter Straße 26, 85716 Unterschleißheim, GERMANY Phone: +49 89 3179 8438 Fax: +49 89 3179 8927 Mobile: +49 170 635 3830 E-Mail: tobias.mu...@mbda-systems.de http://www.mbda.net Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Antoine Bouvier Managing Director: Werner Kaltenegger Registered Office: Schrobenhausen Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Ingolstadt, HRB 4365 -Original Message- From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Henrik Dige Semark Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 1:35 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] Samba + Winbind + Windows 2003 AD Hey out there. I have to join my UNIX server with an existing Win2k3 AD network. My system info: Debian Lenny Samba - 3.4.8 Winbind - 3.4.8 Windows Server 2003 with 2000-style-AD My problem is that, I have en UNIX server that have to run auth up against our existing windows 2003 AD. I have successfully joined my UNIX server to the AD, without problems. # net ads join -U Administrator Enter Administrator's password: Using short domain name -- TEST Joined 'MAIL' to realm 'TEST.LOCAL' My Samba config: http://pastebin.com/ZqaA0Ypn After the join I'm able to lookup peoples with # wbinfo -u [...] XX hds XXX [...] # wbinfo -g [...] bg XX bg hds bg XXX [...] Now the problem, getent only returns the local users and not the users from the AD The funny thing is that if a user is local on the UNIX and in the AD, I can login with the password from both local and AD, so I know that it can lookup people and passwords # getent passwd hs ; echo $? 2 When I debug on getent it returns 2, witch means that it can't find the user. I know there can be a problem with this if the resolv-names is not working # ping addc.UNDERVISNING.LOCAL PING addc.birke-gym.dk (10.3.17.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from bgdc.birke-gym.dk (10.3.17.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=0.211 ms 64 bytes from bgdc.birke-gym.dk (10.3.17.1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=0.207 ms # ping mail.UNDERVISNING.LOCAL PING mail.birke-gym.dk (127.0.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from mail.birke-gym.dk (127.0.1.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.099 ms 64 bytes from mail.birke-gym.dk (127.0.1.1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.094 ms Is there anyone that can see where I have done something rung in my samba-config.? -- Med Venlig Hilsen / Best Regards Henrik Dige Semark -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba + Winbind + Windows 2003 AD
On 18 July 2010 01:34, Henrik Dige Semark h...@semark.dk wrote: Hey out there. I have to join my UNIX server with an existing Win2k3 AD network. My system info: Debian Lenny Samba - 3.4.8 Winbind - 3.4.8 Windows Server 2003 with 2000-style-AD My problem is that, I have en UNIX server that have to run auth up against our existing windows 2003 AD. I have successfully joined my UNIX server to the AD, without problems. # net ads join -U Administrator Enter Administrator's password: Using short domain name -- TEST Joined 'MAIL' to realm 'TEST.LOCAL' My Samba config: http://pastebin.com/ZqaA0Ypn After the join I'm able to lookup peoples with # wbinfo -u [...] # wbinfo -g [...] Now the problem, getent only returns the local users and not the users from the AD The funny thing is that if a user is local on the UNIX and in the AD, I can login with the password from both local and AD, so I know that it can lookup people and passwords # getent passwd hs ; echo $? 2 When I debug on getent it returns 2, witch means that it can't find the user. Do you have winbind specified in your nsswitch.conf file as mentioned here: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/winbind.html#id2654732 -- Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] User security and public shares
2010/7/18 Lord Devi lordd...@gmail.com: have tried to create a configuration in which two shares exist ( [data], and [apps] ) that require user authentication to access. While at the same time there exists a share, [public] which I want to be browseable and connectable by everyone with NO password. read map to guest in man smb.conf -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba + Winbind + Windows 2003 AD
Hi Micheal Sorry for not sending that information in the first place, but I though that it was so basic that it wasn't necessary. My nsswitch.conf: # cat /etc/nsswitch.conf # /etc/nsswitch.conf # # Example configuration of GNU Name Service Switch functionality. # If you have the `glibc-doc-reference' and `info' packages installed, try: # `info libc Name Service Switch' for information about this file. passwd: compat winbind group: compat winbind shadow: compat winbind hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns mdns4 networks: files services: db files ethers: db files protocols: db files rpc:db files netgroup: nis I will mean that it is the way to do this (and it works just fine on the UNIX servers that run there own Domain Controller) Med Venlig Hilsen / Best Regards Henrik Dige Semark Den 18-07-2010 17:03, Michael Wood skrev: On 18 July 2010 01:34, Henrik Dige Semarkh...@semark.dk wrote: Hey out there. I have to join my UNIX server with an existing Win2k3 AD network. My system info: Debian Lenny Samba - 3.4.8 Winbind - 3.4.8 Windows Server 2003 with 2000-style-AD My problem is that, I have en UNIX server that have to run auth up against our existing windows 2003 AD. I have successfully joined my UNIX server to the AD, without problems. # net ads join -U Administrator Enter Administrator's password: Using short domain name -- TEST Joined 'MAIL' to realm 'TEST.LOCAL' My Samba config: http://pastebin.com/ZqaA0Ypn After the join I'm able to lookup peoples with # wbinfo -u [...] # wbinfo -g [...] Now the problem, getent only returns the local users and not the users from the AD The funny thing is that if a user is local on the UNIX and in the AD, I can login with the password from both local and AD, so I know that it can lookup people and passwords # getent passwd hs ; echo $? 2 When I debug on getent it returns 2, witch means that it can't find the user. Do you have winbind specified in your nsswitch.conf file as mentioned here: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/winbind.html#id2654732 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba + Winbind + Windows 2003 AD
I accidentally deleted the first set of messages in my email for this thread, but does your DNS resolve properly? What does your resolv.conf look like? Also, what do these files look like: krb5.conf smb.conf There's an option in smb.conf, winbind enum users, which needs to be set in order for getent to function properly. There is a corresponding option for groups as well. Look at them and let us know. Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 01:12:41 +0200 From: h...@semark.dk To: esiot...@gmail.com CC: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba + Winbind + Windows 2003 AD Hi Micheal Sorry for not sending that information in the first place, but I though that it was so basic that it wasn't necessary. My nsswitch.conf: # cat /etc/nsswitch.conf # /etc/nsswitch.conf # # Example configuration of GNU Name Service Switch functionality. # If you have the `glibc-doc-reference' and `info' packages installed, try: # `info libc Name Service Switch' for information about this file. passwd: compat winbind group: compat winbind shadow: compat winbind hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns mdns4 networks: files services: db files ethers: db files protocols: db files rpc:db files netgroup: nis I will mean that it is the way to do this (and it works just fine on the UNIX servers that run there own Domain Controller) Med Venlig Hilsen / Best Regards Henrik Dige Semark Den 18-07-2010 17:03, Michael Wood skrev: On 18 July 2010 01:34, Henrik Dige Semarkh...@semark.dk wrote: Hey out there. I have to join my UNIX server with an existing Win2k3 AD network. My system info: Debian Lenny Samba - 3.4.8 Winbind - 3.4.8 Windows Server 2003 with 2000-style-AD My problem is that, I have en UNIX server that have to run auth up against our existing windows 2003 AD. I have successfully joined my UNIX server to the AD, without problems. # net ads join -U Administrator Enter Administrator's password: Using short domain name -- TEST Joined 'MAIL' to realm 'TEST.LOCAL' My Samba config: http://pastebin.com/ZqaA0Ypn After the join I'm able to lookup peoples with # wbinfo -u [...] # wbinfo -g [...] Now the problem, getent only returns the local users and not the users from the AD The funny thing is that if a user is local on the UNIX and in the AD, I can login with the password from both local and AD, so I know that it can lookup people and passwords # getent passwd hs ; echo $? 2 When I debug on getent it returns 2, witch means that it can't find the user. Do you have winbind specified in your nsswitch.conf file as mentioned here: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/winbind.html#id2654732 _ The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] How to regenerate passdb.tdb
Hi all again,
seems like there is some strange complications going on.
Now I get a tens of strange warning from logcheck everyday:
localhost smbd[32215]: pam_unix(samba:session): session opened for
user someuser by anotheruser(uid=0)
localhost smbd[32215]: pam_unix(samba:session): session opened for
user user10 by someuser(uid=0)
localhost smbd[32215]: pam_unix(samba:session): session opened for
user user3 by user21(uid=0)
etc.etc...
I could confirm that the user did open a connection at that particular
time, but I am expecting the connection would be opened by root
(uid=0) instead of by some restricted user.
However, from my observation, there weren't any security bleach nor
any real problem functionally. Each user is still bounded by his/her
permission granted.
Can I safely ignore those strange log, or is something really going very
wrong?
Thanks for all input,
Abe
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Abe Lau
abelau+sa...@gmail.comabelau%2bsa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Abe Lau
abelau+sa...@gmail.comabelau%2bsa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/08/2010 05:43 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:32:32AM +1000, Abe Lau wrote:
Hi,
I was having problem with the tdbsam backend in which a particular user
got
listed twice with pdbedit.
(http://www.mail-archive.com/samba@lists.samba.org/msg109110.html)
Without much hope in fixing it, I am planning to re-generating
passdb.tdb on
my PDC by:
(1)exporting tdbsam to smbpasswd backend
(2)delete passdb.tdb
(3)re-import smbpasswd to tdbsam backend
If you do this you lose a lot of the extra
data that tdbsam stores that smbpasswd does
not.
Jeremy.
Does tdbdump passdb.tbd show the user listed twice?
Maybe you can use tdbtool to edit a copy of the file. The man page for
tdbbackup indicates it can check for corruption (but not fix it.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Yes, it seems to have appeared twice
`tdbdump passdb.tdb` gives
{
key(13) = RID_03e9\00
data(5) = usera\00
}
{
key(10) = USER_usera\00
data(180) =
\00\00\00\00\FF\FF\FF\7F\FF\FF\FF\7F\00\00\00\00\B2c6L\00\00\00\00\FF\FF\FF\7F\05\00\00\00nick\00\04\00\00\00ORL\00\01\00\00\00\00\01\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\01\00\00\00\00\01\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\01\00\00\00\00T\04\00\00\01\02\00\00\00\00\00\00\10\00\00\00\03\0C\8C\98\89\87\DC+\CE\0Ax)JP\01\00\00\00\00\10\00\00\00\A8\00\15\00\00\00
\00\00\00\FF\FF\FF\FF\FF\FF\FF\FF\FF\FF\FF\FF\FF\FF\FF\FF\FF\FF\FF\FF\FF\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\EC\04\00\00
}
..
{
key(13) = RID_0454\00
data(5) = usera\00
}
I have tried using tdbbackup -v, but it didn't indicate any corruption. I
may try tdbtool on a copy of passdb.db and see how it goes. Thanks for the
suggestion.
Just tried using tdbtool and removed one of the duplicated RID key of
usera. I randomly picked one, because I am really not sure which one is
correct (or if it even matters). Now, pdbedit does not display 2 duplicated
entries. I hope that is the solution, and the problem won't come back
again. will report back in case this leads to other complications.
Just a side note, according to the old man page of tdbtool (
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/manpages-3/tdbtool.8.html), there is
an option check to verify the integrity of tdb file, but my copy from
Debian Lenny doesn't have it!
I wonder if there is any other better integrity checking tool for the tdb,
apart from tdbbackup, which didn't ever report any problem in my case all
the way anyway!
Thanks all for the help,
Abe
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: Users only have to authenticate once, how to determine where credentials are cached and for how long?
Hi, Can this cache be manually purged? you can try deleting the temporary TDB files from the samba$root:[var...] locations to verify whether the passwords are getting cached here. The session establishment from the client with previous login is common in PC but should gets cleaned up also with explicit deletion of the session using the below command from the client: net use share-name /d Please also check whether you have enabled guest access guest Ok = yes. By enabling this if the normal user authentication fails then it switches to guest account. HTH On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Hp Login hp.login.acco...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings, I am running OpenVMS 8.3 (Alpha) and have installed CIFS 1.2 (a.k.a Samba 3.0.28a) as a Standalone. When my users connect for the first time to any share they have access to they are prompted for their credentials, they supply their CIFS username and password, and they are allowed in. Any further attempts to access that share or any other they have access to is successful and no credentials are requested. I have bounced the services and the server OS several times, have rebooted the clients numerous time, and have tried logging into client workstations I have not previously used and my credentials are following me. So it appears that credentials are being cached on the server but I cannot find any way to determine how they are being cached and for how long. Can this cache be manually purged? passdb backend = tdbsam security = user domain master = no domain logons = no Many thanks for any insight into what is happening here. PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Automated Reply from Tim Oakley toak...@maury-imprimeur.fr?=
I will be on vacation until the 2nd August 2010. Urgent enquiries can be adressed to Jean Pierre CLEMOT at 0238323433 ** Je serai en conge jusqu'au 2 août 2010. En cas d'urgence, merci d'appeler Jean Pierre CLEMOT au 0238323433 PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Build status as of Sun Jul 18 06:00:02 2010
URL: http://build.samba.org/ --- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2010-07-17 00:00:04.0 -0600 +++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2010-07-18 00:00:05.0 -0600 @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ -Build status as of Sat Jul 17 06:00:03 2010 +Build status as of Sun Jul 18 06:00:02 2010 Build counts: Tree Total Broken Panic build_farm 0 0 0 -ccache 30 7 0 +ccache 30 1 0 ldb 30 9 0 libreplace 30 11 0 lorikeet 0 0 0
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated
The branch, master has been updated via b9835a1... s3: Don't use as-needed from bd54969... pam_winbind: Fix shadowing a global on FreeBSD http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log - commit b9835a1f9d8b81e4121a01a190dffaefe67cbe5c Author: Volker Lendecke v...@samba.org Date: Sun Jul 18 11:56:17 2010 +0200 s3: Don't use as-needed This is just broken. RHEL5 can't deal with it, FreeBSD8 is broken with it, and who knows what other platforms are broken. I can rather live with a system that links in a bit too much than a system that does not work at all. --- Summary of changes: source3/configure.in | 33 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) Changeset truncated at 500 lines: diff --git a/source3/configure.in b/source3/configure.in index 6157f37..43119fb 100644 --- a/source3/configure.in +++ b/source3/configure.in @@ -1799,39 +1799,6 @@ fi AC_MSG_RESULT($BLDSHARED) -saved_before_as_needed_ldflags=$LDFLAGS -for flags in -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,ignore -z ignore ; do - saved_ldflags=$LDFLAGS - AC_MSG_CHECKING([if $flags works]) - LDFLAGS=$flags $saved_ldflags - AC_TRY_LINK([],[], - [AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]) - LD_AS_NEEDED_FLAG=$flags - ld_as_needed_flag_found=yes], - AC_MSG_RESULT([no])) - LDFLAGS=$LD_AS_NEEDED_FLAG $saved_ldflags - test x$ld_as_needed_flag_found = xyes break -done - -# check if we have to disable LD_AS_NEEDED_FLAG: -# On some systems for a veriety of reasons linking with -# -Wl,--as-needed -lreadline -lncurses fails -# we have to retest, if these combination is detected before. -# Bugzilla #7209 - -if test x$ac_cv_lib_readline_rl_callback_handler_install = xyes ; then - if test x$ld_as_needed_flag_found = xyes ; then - AC_MSG_CHECKING([if $LD_AS_NEEDED_FLAG works with readline]) - # try if check no fails - save_LIBS=$LIBS - LIBS=$LIBS $TERMLIBS - AC_TRY_LINK([], [rl_callback_handler_install();], [AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])],[ AC_MSG_RESULT([no]); LDFLAGS=$saved_before_as_needed_ldflags]) - LIBS=$save_LIBS -fi -fi - - - # for historical reasons almost all linkers don't complain about unresolved # symbols in shared libs. Except for the internal samba modules we want to get # errors when we produce a shared lib with unresolved symbols. On some -- Samba Shared Repository
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated
The branch, master has been updated
via 0d16a59... s3-waf: Fixed the build.
from b9835a1... s3: Don't use as-needed
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit 0d16a591f4053785f419b27b7bc9694ecdd47fd0
Author: Andreas Schneider a...@samba.org
Date: Sun Jul 18 11:28:24 2010 +0200
s3-waf: Fixed the build.
---
Summary of changes:
source3/wscript_build |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Changeset truncated at 500 lines:
diff --git a/source3/wscript_build b/source3/wscript_build
index 92c4bdf..f526501 100644
--- a/source3/wscript_build
+++ b/source3/wscript_build
@@ -415,8 +415,10 @@ RPC_SERVER_SRC = '''${RPC_PIPE_SRC} ${NPA_TSTREAM_SRC}'''
RPC_PARSE_SRC = '''${RPC_PARSE_SRC2}'''
-RPC_CLIENT_SRC = '''rpc_client/cli_pipe.c rpc_client/rpc_transport_np.c
-rpc_client/rpc_transport_sock.c rpc_client/rpc_transport_smbd.c'''
+RPC_CLIENT_SRC = '''rpc_client/cli_pipe.c librpc/rpc/rpc_common.c
+rpc_client/rpc_transport_np.c
+ rpc_client/rpc_transport_sock.c
+ rpc_client/rpc_transport_smbd.c'''
LOCKING_SRC = '''locking/locking.c locking/brlock.c locking/posix.c'''
--
Samba Shared Repository
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated
The branch, master has been updated
via 898fd58... s3-rpc_client: Fixed a segfault in
rpccli_samr_chng_pswd_auth_crap().
from 0d16a59... s3-waf: Fixed the build.
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit 898fd584a4f96ba40c2692550518856671892add
Author: Andreas Schneider a...@samba.org
Date: Sun Jul 18 15:04:20 2010 +0200
s3-rpc_client: Fixed a segfault in rpccli_samr_chng_pswd_auth_crap().
This fixes the WINBIND-WBCLIENT test. The test set
old_lm_hash_enc_blob.length to 0 and we don't check the length here. So
the memcpy segfaulted.
---
Summary of changes:
source3/rpc_client/cli_samr.c | 27 +++
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Changeset truncated at 500 lines:
diff --git a/source3/rpc_client/cli_samr.c b/source3/rpc_client/cli_samr.c
index 8c92ebb..8c10112 100644
--- a/source3/rpc_client/cli_samr.c
+++ b/source3/rpc_client/cli_samr.c
@@ -165,10 +165,29 @@ NTSTATUS rpccli_samr_chng_pswd_auth_crap(struct
rpc_pipe_client *cli,
init_lsa_String(server, cli-srv_name_slash);
init_lsa_String(account, username);
- memcpy(new_nt_password.data, new_nt_password_blob.data, 516);
- memcpy(new_lm_password.data, new_lm_password_blob.data, 516);
- memcpy(old_nt_hash_enc.hash, old_nt_hash_enc_blob.data, 16);
- memcpy(old_lm_hash_enc.hash, old_lm_hash_enc_blob.data, 16);
+ if (new_nt_password_blob.length 0) {
+ memcpy(new_nt_password.data, new_nt_password_blob.data, 516);
+ } else {
+ ZERO_STRUCT(new_nt_password_blob);
+ }
+
+ if (new_lm_password_blob.length 0) {
+ memcpy(new_lm_password.data, new_lm_password_blob.data, 516);
+ } else {
+ ZERO_STRUCT(new_lm_password);
+ }
+
+ if (old_nt_hash_enc_blob.length 0) {
+ memcpy(old_nt_hash_enc.hash, old_nt_hash_enc_blob.data, 16);
+ } else {
+ ZERO_STRUCT(old_nt_hash_enc);
+ }
+
+ if (old_lm_hash_enc_blob.length 0) {
+ memcpy(old_lm_hash_enc.hash, old_lm_hash_enc_blob.data, 16);
+ } else {
+ ZERO_STRUCT(old_lm_hash_enc);
+ }
result = rpccli_samr_ChangePasswordUser2(cli, mem_ctx,
server,
--
Samba Shared Repository
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated
The branch, master has been updated
via 27aece7... s3: Actually use the usecs in aio_fork_suspend
via 1946beb... s3: Fix an uninitialized variable
via 55512f4... s3: Work better without the aio sighandler
via b1717ac... s3: Fix some nonempty blank lines
via 7ac5828... s3: Remove a direct use of procid_self()
from 898fd58... s3-rpc_client: Fixed a segfault in
rpccli_samr_chng_pswd_auth_crap().
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit 27aece72004a84a6e0b2e00987d8a362e307d1d8
Author: Volker Lendecke v...@samba.org
Date: Sun Jul 18 17:12:30 2010 +0200
s3: Actually use the usecs in aio_fork_suspend
Jeremy, please check!
commit 1946beb679c7de75b142b30d84b5e4bf12c7e6bd
Author: Volker Lendecke v...@samba.org
Date: Sun Jul 18 17:12:11 2010 +0200
s3: Fix an uninitialized variable
commit 55512f479172047ae7f69604c23fffecf66de8c4
Author: Volker Lendecke v...@samba.org
Date: Sun Jul 18 14:40:43 2010 +0200
s3: Work better without the aio sighandler
Refuse async I/O if we can't set up the signal handler
commit b1717ac92edbc08e1f4cd2a38dd9f60be8492469
Author: Volker Lendecke v...@samba.org
Date: Sun Jul 18 13:39:51 2010 +0200
s3: Fix some nonempty blank lines
commit 7ac58281aeebe4be282ca719ba1da2f821e521a5
Author: Volker Lendecke v...@samba.org
Date: Sat Jul 17 23:16:26 2010 +0200
s3: Remove a direct use of procid_self()
---
Summary of changes:
source3/modules/vfs_aio_fork.c |5 +++--
source3/smbd/aio.c | 29 ++---
source3/utils/net_dns.c | 10 --
source3/winbindd/winbindd_dual.c |8 +---
4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Changeset truncated at 500 lines:
diff --git a/source3/modules/vfs_aio_fork.c b/source3/modules/vfs_aio_fork.c
index b43aad2..02b1394 100644
--- a/source3/modules/vfs_aio_fork.c
+++ b/source3/modules/vfs_aio_fork.c
@@ -765,10 +765,11 @@ static int aio_fork_suspend(struct vfs_handle_struct
*handle,
}
if (timeout) {
- struct timeval tv;
+ struct timeval tv = convert_timespec_to_timeval(*timeout);
struct tevent_timer *te = tevent_add_timer(ev,
frame,
-
timeval_current_ofs(tv.tv_sec,0),
+ timeval_current_ofs(tv.tv_sec,
+ tv.tv_usec),
aio_fork_suspend_timed_out,
timed_out);
if (!te) {
diff --git a/source3/smbd/aio.c b/source3/smbd/aio.c
index a5a0e44..dbce120 100644
--- a/source3/smbd/aio.c
+++ b/source3/smbd/aio.c
@@ -67,11 +67,17 @@ static void smbd_aio_signal_handler(struct tevent_context
*ev_ctx,
}
-static void initialize_async_io_handler(void)
+static bool initialize_async_io_handler(void)
{
+ static bool tried_signal_setup = false;
+
if (aio_signal_event) {
- return;
+ return true;
+ }
+ if (tried_signal_setup) {
+ return false;
}
+ tried_signal_setup = true;
aio_signal_event = tevent_add_signal(smbd_event_context(),
smbd_event_context(),
@@ -79,7 +85,8 @@ static void initialize_async_io_handler(void)
smbd_aio_signal_handler,
NULL);
if (!aio_signal_event) {
- exit_server(Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_AIO handler);
+ DEBUG(10, (Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_AIO handler\n));
+ return false;
}
/* tevent supports 100 signal with SA_SIGINFO */
@@ -145,7 +152,9 @@ NTSTATUS schedule_aio_read_and_X(connection_struct *conn,
int ret;
/* Ensure aio is initialized. */
- initialize_async_io_handler();
+ if (!initialize_async_io_handler()) {
+ return NT_STATUS_RETRY;
+ }
if (fsp-base_fsp != NULL) {
/* No AIO on streams yet */
@@ -250,7 +259,9 @@ NTSTATUS schedule_aio_write_and_X(connection_struct *conn,
int ret;
/* Ensure aio is initialized. */
- initialize_async_io_handler();
+ if (!initialize_async_io_handler()) {
+ return NT_STATUS_RETRY;
+ }
if (fsp-base_fsp != NULL) {
/* No AIO on streams yet */
@@ -382,7 +393,9 @@ NTSTATUS schedule_smb2_aio_read(connection_struct *conn,
int ret;
/* Ensure aio is initialized. */
- initialize_async_io_handler();
+ if (!initialize_async_io_handler()) {
+ return
