Re: [Samba] samba 4 questions
Hi, Im in a project with this issues. Look at my thread: HOWTO samba4 centos5.5 named dnsupdate drbd simple failover In my company I have running a samba3 pdc bdc. In my case a real failover with tis construction didn' t work really. Everytime a had a amount of 40% of the clients could not logon anymore after the pdc failed. Because of this I tested samba4 and it fulfilled everyting to 99%. Good Luck Daniel --- EDV Daniel Müller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 72076 Tübingen Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 eMail: muel...@tropenklinik.de Internet: www.tropenklinik.de --- -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Im Auftrag von AJ Hettema Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. September 2010 16:28 An: samba@lists.samba.org Betreff: [Samba] samba 4 questions hi All, first of all, please keep up the good work. I use samba for at least 10 years now, and it never let me down. And the samba 4 release would even be better then ever (tried the alpha's already in test labs with multiple AD controllers, very impressive). But, now I am facing some difficulties. I need to migrate a small firm (40 users or something, will increase to 50 in 2 years or so) to a newer infrastructure and they use samba just for file sharing for the moment (version 3). It's rock solid stable with up times of 200 days or so. For the moment they lack any user authentication platform, they just have local users with some scripts on there machines and based on some configuration files on a read only samba share they get access to specific shares or not. I would like to migrate them to a twin server setup for dns, dhcp and samba. WIthin dhcp and dns I can get primary/secondary configurations pretty easy, and with the DFS stuff in samba3 I can have a very acceptable solution for failover as well (with the help of some regedits and scripts to clean up the cache and configure some client parameters). If the primary server fails, just logout and log on again and the shares will be accessed on the secondary server with a small timeout. The data will be replicated to this second server with a max interval of an hour, which is enough. Ok so far the general idea. They don't have something like AD for the moment and implementing MS AD would mean additional costs (hardware and license costs) and administrative overhead. So I want to know if it would be possible to use Samba 4 alpha 12 for this purpose? I don't need the full set of features, only the below ones: - a single domain consisting of 2 samba servers acting as Domain Controllers (with replication of course) - users and groups within this domain, nothing spectacular, just a group per share and some application groups - DFS functionality as in samba 3 - file serving (incl. roaming profiles) I don't need intermixed domains with MS AD servers, only winxp clients will talk to these servers. I don't need the printing stuff, because that's quiet easy to handle with some scripts (based on groups of course). I don't need the group policy stuff very much as well (I do use it however), because basically that's just registry settings which are configured and I can do that scripted as well. I can handle the dhcp/dns/ddns stuff via their respective configurations, and all the machine's will have fixed ip-addresses in the dhcp server anyway. There is just a small dhcp-range for incidental usage. Now, the question is, can I use samba 4 alpha12 or later for the above mentioned requirements? I don't mind compiling and rebuilding in case of newer versions and I am comfortable with some bugs (for instance, everything needs to be lowercase, passwords aren't changeable by users, or something like that). I even don't mind to reboot once every week or month or so (have to do maintenance anyway). So basically, is the code for these features stable enough or not? Or is it possible to use groups in Samba 3 and have some central user authentication as with Samba 4 would be the case? (then I will upgrade to Samba 4 when it is released of course) kind regards and thanks in advance Jouk -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Machine account reject - additional troubleshooting
Hi Miguel, Thanks for the reply. I tried these changing these two settings and it has not made a difference for us. One interesting observation I have made is that the logs are only being flooded from a portion of our Windows 7 machines. This has me really puzzled -- I have built them all following the same steps and using the same software. Go figure. -Bryan Hi Brian, Hi Miguel! Yes, the changes don't work for me either - I opened a bug at bugzilla.samba.org, maybe the developer could tell more about that. @Brian - you are right, not all of the windows7 machines show that behaviour. And I am not sure if that problem is only samba-ldap related (I saw a few statements that samba-tdbsam does not show that problem) regards Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] question about CIFS client glitches
At 08:44 PM 9/16/2010 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: >RHEL6 is fairly current with mainline code (at least as of this past >spring or so). If it works OK on Fedora, it should be OK in RHEL6. Super. I'll try loading up the 6 beta in a VM and check it out. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] question about CIFS client glitches
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 20:00:14 -0400 starli...@binnacle.cx wrote: > At 05:50 PM 9/16/2010 -0500, Steve French wrote: > >On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:39 PM, wrote: > >> Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS > >> 5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out how to > >> proceed. > ... > > > >This is quite old kernel, but perhaps it was updated to include more > >recent fixes - can you view the version information on the file, ie > >the cifs.ko module (you can do this by running modinfo on > >cifs.ko) > > > > Thank you for the follow-up. Per my last message this was my > being a clueless in regards to the lack of hard/soft link > support in the old version. 'modinfo' pegs it as 1.60RH. > > Hopefully RHEL6 will include CIFS file links as it might work > better to compile on Linux from a Windows share rather than > vice-versa. 'makedepend' runs painfully slow from Windows over > a Samba share unless IPoIB is used for transport. > > Perhaps I'll try it under Fedora, though in general I find > wrestling with the constant change of the moving-target distro > too much. > > It is quite encouraging to see CIFS work in general. Last time > I tried three or four years ago the system crashed shortly after > issuing the mount command. > RHEL6 is fairly current with mainline code (at least as of this past spring or so). If it works OK on Fedora, it should be OK in RHEL6. -- Jeff Layton -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] question about CIFS client glitches
At 05:50 PM 9/16/2010 -0500, Steve French wrote: >On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:39 PM, wrote: >> Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS >> 5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out how to >> proceed. ... > >This is quite old kernel, but perhaps it was updated to include more >recent fixes - can you view the version information on the file, ie >the cifs.ko module (you can do this by running modinfo on >cifs.ko) > Thank you for the follow-up. Per my last message this was my being a clueless in regards to the lack of hard/soft link support in the old version. 'modinfo' pegs it as 1.60RH. Hopefully RHEL6 will include CIFS file links as it might work better to compile on Linux from a Windows share rather than vice-versa. 'makedepend' runs painfully slow from Windows over a Samba share unless IPoIB is used for transport. Perhaps I'll try it under Fedora, though in general I find wrestling with the constant change of the moving-target distro too much. It is quite encouraging to see CIFS work in general. Last time I tried three or four years ago the system crashed shortly after issuing the mount command. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba 4 moved mount.cifs and umount.cifs to /usr/local/bin/?
I'm trying to work from the Samba 4 source and SRPM's to build a nice clean Samba package for work, to test some of its features. Overall, I'm happy with what I see, but the new "autogen.sh" seems to construct its "source4/configure" script from these "build" tools, and they entirely ignore the concept of "sbindir" in installing the mount.cifs and umount.cifs utilitis: those wind up in "bindir", not "sbindir". Was that change deliberate? If not, it's going to mess with RHEL and similar operating systems where those system utilities are not normally accessible to users, and are normally summoned from the "mount" command with the "mount -t cifs" option. It's especially going to break autofs. Any observations or suggestions on how best to address that? I can move them to the "sbindir" as a post-install process, but that's begging for confusion. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] question about CIFS client glitches
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:49:49 -0400 starli...@binnacle.cx wrote: > At 05:39 PM 9/16/2010 -0400, starli...@binnacle.cx wrote: > >Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS > >5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out how to > >proceed. > > Oops. I see the problem is that CIFS, at least in the older > stable versions, does not support hard links. The extracted > archives have a few of these and so the resulting tree is not a > synchronized copy of the original. > > Oh well, so much for that. > Ok, good to know. There were patches that went to mainline to make CIFS support server inode numbers correctly, which is sort of a requirement for proper hardlink support. Those were really too invasive for a minor RHEL release however. -- Jeff Layton -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] question about CIFS client glitches
At 05:39 PM 9/16/2010 -0400, starli...@binnacle.cx wrote: >Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS >5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out how to >proceed. Oops. I see the problem is that CIFS, at least in the older stable versions, does not support hard links. The extracted archives have a few of these and so the resulting tree is not a synchronized copy of the original. Oh well, so much for that. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] file names convert
On 2010-09-16 at 13:38 +0200 Michael Wood sent off: > Hi > > On 16 September 2010 09:02, Alessio Tomelleri - ARPAV Dipartimento di > Belluno wrote: > > ..maybe could be useful this command ?! get a closer look "man tr" > > > > tr [:upper:] [:lower:] < myfile > > He wants to change the filename, not the contents :) convmv --lower -r /bla/ if you also have non-ASCII characters, you may also specify the charset so that it lowercases those characters correctly. Björn -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen phone: +49-551-37-0, fax: +49-551-37-9 AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] question about CIFS client glitches
Hello, Trying out a CIFS mount of a W2K8 x64 file system from CentOS 5.5 and running into problems, and trying to figure out how to proceed. I mount up the Windows share, then run a script that expands about ten TAR format archives containing a couple of hundred files with the 'pax' utility. Then it removes about two dozen files. The script is a primitive source-code version extractor. Unfortunately the resulting tree is quite incorrect. Some of the files that should be deleted by the 'rm' commands are not, and some of the files that should be there from the expansion are missing. The script works fine with EXT2/3/4 and NFSv3 mounts. So it seems to me CIFS mounts are not ready for use in production or development. Before I give up, is there anything obvious that I'm missing? I searched for relevant bugs in Red Hat, Samba and Kernel.org bugzillas and didn't find anything that seems to match. The version mix in use is a little odd. The kernel and 'cifs.ko' modules are pure RHEL/CentOS version 2.6.18-194.11.3.el5, but instead of using the distro version of Samba the system is running vanilla Samba 3.5.2. If anyone has any ideas or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Machine account reject - additional troubleshooting
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 20:11 +0100, Miguel Medalha wrote: > > > (My last suspision is, that win7 is doing the machine authentication > > in a different [encryption)] way as the XP machine are doing > > that as XP machines do not have that problem) > > On each Windows 7 computer, we had to change two settings in "Local > Security Policy -> Local Policies -> Security Options". Those settings > were: > > "Network Security: Do not store LAN Manager hash value on next > password" change from "Enabled" to "Disabled" > "Network Security: LAN Manager authentication level" change from "Not > Defined" to "Send LM & NTLM responses" Hi Miguel, Thanks for the reply. I tried these changing these two settings and it has not made a difference for us. One interesting observation I have made is that the logs are only being flooded from a portion of our Windows 7 machines. This has me really puzzled -- I have built them all following the same steps and using the same software. Go figure. -Bryan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba/Cups print server filename
Is it possible to stop the smbprn.000X going to the front of the spool file? On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 02:16:10PM +0100, Mark Adams wrote: > Hi All, > > I have working setup of samba passing through printers to cups. When the > filename goes through, it has "smbprn.01" appended to the start of > the document name. Is it possible to remove this? > > Regards, > Mark > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] file names convert
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 01:38:05PM +0200, Michael Wood wrote: > On 16 September 2010 09:02, Alessio Tomelleri - ARPAV Dipartimento di > Belluno wrote: > > ..maybe could be useful this command ?! get a closer look "man tr" > > > > tr [:upper:] [:lower:] < myfile > > He wants to change the filename, not the contents :) > > > maybe, inserting it in a script as well... > > Try something like: > > for f in *; do Breaks on filenames with spaces. > lower="`echo $f | tr [:upper:] [:lower:]`" > if [ "$f" != "$lower" ]; then > mv -i "$f" "$lower" > fi > done > > The "mv -i" is in case you have a file called "README.txt" and another > one called "Readme.txt" in the same directory. > > Please try it out on some test files before running it in production. How about "rename 's/(.*)/\L$1\E/' filenames" ? -- Len Sorensen -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] samba 4 questions
hi All, first of all, please keep up the good work. I use samba for at least 10 years now, and it never let me down. And the samba 4 release would even be better then ever (tried the alpha's already in test labs with multiple AD controllers, very impressive). But, now I am facing some difficulties. I need to migrate a small firm (40 users or something, will increase to 50 in 2 years or so) to a newer infrastructure and they use samba just for file sharing for the moment (version 3). It's rock solid stable with up times of 200 days or so. For the moment they lack any user authentication platform, they just have local users with some scripts on there machines and based on some configuration files on a read only samba share they get access to specific shares or not. I would like to migrate them to a twin server setup for dns, dhcp and samba. WIthin dhcp and dns I can get primary/secondary configurations pretty easy, and with the DFS stuff in samba3 I can have a very acceptable solution for failover as well (with the help of some regedits and scripts to clean up the cache and configure some client parameters). If the primary server fails, just logout and log on again and the shares will be accessed on the secondary server with a small timeout. The data will be replicated to this second server with a max interval of an hour, which is enough. Ok so far the general idea. They don't have something like AD for the moment and implementing MS AD would mean additional costs (hardware and license costs) and administrative overhead. So I want to know if it would be possible to use Samba 4 alpha 12 for this purpose? I don't need the full set of features, only the below ones: - a single domain consisting of 2 samba servers acting as Domain Controllers (with replication of course) - users and groups within this domain, nothing spectacular, just a group per share and some application groups - DFS functionality as in samba 3 - file serving (incl. roaming profiles) I don't need intermixed domains with MS AD servers, only winxp clients will talk to these servers. I don't need the printing stuff, because that's quiet easy to handle with some scripts (based on groups of course). I don't need the group policy stuff very much as well (I do use it however), because basically that's just registry settings which are configured and I can do that scripted as well. I can handle the dhcp/dns/ddns stuff via their respective configurations, and all the machine's will have fixed ip-addresses in the dhcp server anyway. There is just a small dhcp-range for incidental usage. Now, the question is, can I use samba 4 alpha12 or later for the above mentioned requirements? I don't mind compiling and rebuilding in case of newer versions and I am comfortable with some bugs (for instance, everything needs to be lowercase, passwords aren't changeable by users, or something like that). I even don't mind to reboot once every week or month or so (have to do maintenance anyway). So basically, is the code for these features stable enough or not? Or is it possible to use groups in Samba 3 and have some central user authentication as with Samba 4 would be the case? (then I will upgrade to Samba 4 when it is released of course) kind regards and thanks in advance Jouk -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] VFS : Replacing file during open()
hello, i have samba 3.5.4 on a debian (testing) i wrote a vfs-module, which (during the open()) moves a file on another disc in my server and places a symbolic link instead example: /samba/foo.bar becomes /samba/foo.bar -> /other/disc/foo.bar compiling and using from a pc through samba is no problem, except for editing a file, that was just created and not closed yet i guess, the file-descriptor defined in the files_struct is illegal after replacing the original file (as the inode changed) so can i open the moved file and exchange the file-descriptor, or do you have other ideas to solve this? TIA -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] VFS objects and mount_smbfs on Mac?
Hi all, Is that intended to work? I have a Mac client connected to a Samba share on a linux server (samba 3.2.0). For debugging purposes I've set up a VFS object on my share, which shall trace the actions on the filesystem. guest ok = yes vfs object = full_audit full_audit:success = all full_audit:failure = all full_audit:facility = LOCAL7 full_audit:priority = ALERT and adjusted the log parameters to log level = 0 vfs:10 and got the output suddenly according to the syslog in to the file localmessages. Now I've mounted this share to a Mac (10.6.?) using this command as user mount_smbfs //user:p...@server/share /Users/Shared/share When entering this directory I don't get any entries into the log file (localmessages), which shall trace the activities. Finder doesn't work either. But when accessing the share using smbclient, I get every action traced. But entering the _mounted_ (smbfs) directory, the full_audit trace does not produce any output. Are the VFS objects not working on _mounted_ directories or am I missing something? Thanks for help, Dirk P.S.: I can't access the systems right now, so I can't provide more detailed infos about software releases at the moment etc. Dirk Langner Phone: +49 89 - 94 00 9-345 Tata Consultancy Services Deutschland GmbH Ph: +49 89 - 94 00 9-345 Cell: +49 - 173 - 6780 652 Mailto: dirk.lang...@tcs.com Website: http://www.tcs.com Experience certainty. IT Services Business Solutions Outsourcing --- Directors: Mr. S.Mahalingam, Mr. N.Chandrasekaran, Mr. Pauroos Karkaria, Mr. Per Bragée Register No.: Frankfurt HRB 34240, Düsseldorf HRB 34240, Hamburg HRB 34240, München HRB 34240, Walldorf HRB 34240 --- =-=-= Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] file names convert
> Thanks, for your help. > How can I rename old files on linux server with one command? > I would like to get every files and directory names are lowercase. > I have a script to do this http://github.com/drescherjm/jmdgentoooverlay/raw/master/Other/shell-scripts/mvcase.sh -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] file names convert
Hi On 16 September 2010 09:02, Alessio Tomelleri - ARPAV Dipartimento di Belluno wrote: > ..maybe could be useful this command ?! get a closer look "man tr" > > tr [:upper:] [:lower:] < myfile He wants to change the filename, not the contents :) > maybe, inserting it in a script as well... Try something like: for f in *; do lower="`echo $f | tr [:upper:] [:lower:]`" if [ "$f" != "$lower" ]; then mv -i "$f" "$lower" fi done The "mv -i" is in case you have a file called "README.txt" and another one called "Readme.txt" in the same directory. Please try it out on some test files before running it in production. > Il 16/09/2010 08:19, Engi Zoltán ha scritto: >> On 2010.09.15. 16:32, Volker Lendecke wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 08:39:17AM +0200, Engi Zoltán wrote: I have Samba network with debian linux lenny server and 3 windows clients. Some of users save the files with uppercase, for example "Xlsx". How can J have Samba to do convert files names into lowercase. I am beginner in Samba. >>> Try >>> >>> case sensitive = no >>> short preserve case = no >>> preserve case = no >>> default case = lower >>> >>> Volker >> Thanks, for your help. >> How can I rename old files on linux server with one command? >> I would like to get every files and directory names are lowercase. -- Michael Wood -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] WG: Running 2 SAMBA4 DC Replication WERR_BADFILE error
Can Somebody have a look !? Or an Idea. How bind can resolve the second cname ._mscds. I can take every other cname for my second samba4 but the: a441f8f9-629d-43c4-bce6-a5dfba1e4ad9._msdcs NODE1 is: 02284f45-de16-4125-a795-3b614f540ef7 NODE2 is: a441f8f9-629d-43c4-bce6-a5dfba1e4ad9 So Replication from NODE2 to NODE1 works fine: UpdateRefs OK for a441f8f9-629d-43c4-bce6-a5dfba1e4ad9._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc DC=tuebingen,DC=tst,DC=loc dreplsrv_op_pull_source(WERR_OK) ← No replication error all is ok Replication the other way There is an error: dns child failed to find name 'a441f8f9-629d-43c4-bce6-a5dfba1e4ad9._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc' of type A dreplsrv_notify: Failed to send DsReplicaSync to a441f8f9-629d-43c4-bce6-a5dfba1e4ad9._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc for DC=tuebingen,DC=tst,DC=loc - NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND : WERR_BADFILE ← Error!!?? started DsReplicaSync for CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=tuebingen,DC=tst,DC=loc to a441f8f9-629d-43c4-bce6-a5dfba1e4ad9._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc Asking my bind on NODE1: [r...@node1 etc]# host -t A 02284f45-de16-4125-a795-3b614f540ef7._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc 02284f45-de16-4125-a795-3b614f540ef7._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc is an alias for node1.tuebingen.tst.loc. node1.tuebingen.tst.loc has address 192.168.134.27 And for a441f8f9-629d-43c4-bce6-a5dfba1e4ad9._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc: host -t A a441f8f9-629d-43c4-bce6-a5dfba1e4ad9._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc Host a441f8f9-629d-43c4-bce6-a5dfba1e4ad9._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) No alias record is shown for a441f8f9-629d-43c4-bce6-a5dfba1e4ad9 and node2!? But in my zone-file: IN NS node1 IN NS node2 IN A192.168.134.27 IN A192.168.134.28 node1IN A192.168.134.27 node2IN A192.168.134.28 gc._msdcs IN A192.168.134.27 02284f45-de16-4125-a795-3b614f540ef7._msdcs IN CNAMEnode1 a441f8f9-629d-43c4-bce6-a5dfba1e4ad9._mscds IN CNAMEnode2 What about this??? Any answers out there ??? ON NODE1:The master Samba ADS-Server queued DsReplicaSync for DC=tuebingen,DC=tst,DC=loc to a441f8f9-629d-43c4-bce6-a5dfba1e4ad9._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc (urgent=true) uSN=0:1196872 queued DsReplicaSync for CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=tuebingen,DC=tst,DC=loc to a441f8f9-629d-43c4-bce6-a5dfba1e4ad9._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc (urgent=true) uSN=0:3388 queued DsReplicaSync for CN=Configuration,DC=tuebingen,DC=tst,DC=loc to a441f8f9-629d-43c4-bce6-a5dfba1e4ad9._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc (urgent=true) uSN=0:3571 started DsReplicaSync for DC=tuebingen,DC=tst,DC=loc to a441f8f9-629d-43c4-bce6-a5dfba1e4ad9._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc dreplsrv_notify_schedule(5) scheduled for: Wed Sep 15 09:38:11 2010 CEST Mapped to DCERPC endpoint 135 added interface ip=192.168.134.27 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=192.168.134.27 nmask=255.255.255.0 dns child failed to find name 'a441f8f9-629d-43c4-bce6-a5dfba1e4ad9._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc' of type A dreplsrv_notify: Failed to send DsReplicaSync to a441f8f9-629d-43c4-bce6-a5dfba1e4ad9._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc for DC=tuebingen,DC=tst,DC=loc - NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND : WERR_BADFILE started DsReplicaSync for CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=tuebingen,DC=tst,DC=loc to a441f8f9-629d-43c4-bce6-a5dfba1e4ad9._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc ON NODE2= The second Samba ADS-Server Child /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_spnupdate exited with status 0 - Success Completed SPN update check OK /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: response to GSS-TSIG query was unsuccessful /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: response to GSS-TSIG query was unsuccessful /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: response to GSS-TSIG query was unsuccessful /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: response to GSS-TSIG query was unsuccessful /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: response to GSS-TSIG query was unsuccessful Child /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate exited with status 0 - Success Completed DNS update check OK Registered NODE2<00> with 192.168.134.28 on interface 192.168.134.255 Registered NODE2<03> with 192.168.134.28 on interface 192.168.134.255 Registered NODE2<20> with 192.168.134.28 on interface 192.168.134.255 Registered TUEBINGEN<1c> with 192.168.134.28 on interface 192.168.134.255 Registered TUEBINGEN<00> with 192.168.134.28 on interface 192.168.134.255 dreplsrv_periodic_run(): schedule pull replication dreplsrv_periodic_run(): run pending_ops memory=94 dreplsrv_refresh_partition(DC=tuebingen,DC=tst,DC=loc) dreplsrv_out_connection_attach(02284f45-de16-4125-a795-3b614f540ef7._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc): attach dreplsrv_refresh_partition(CN=Configuration,DC=tuebingen,DC=tst,DC=loc) dreplsrv_out_connection_attach(02284f45-de16-4125-a795-3b614f540ef7._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc): attach dreplsrv_refresh_partition(CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=tuebingen,DC=tst,DC=loc) dreplsrv_out_connection_attach(02284f45-de16-4125-a795-3b614
Re: [Samba] file names convert
..maybe could be useful this command ?! get a closer look "man tr" tr [:upper:] [:lower:] < myfile maybe, inserting it in a script as well... Il 16/09/2010 08:19, Engi Zoltán ha scritto: > On 2010.09.15. 16:32, Volker Lendecke wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 08:39:17AM +0200, Engi Zoltán wrote: >>> I have Samba network with debian linux lenny server and 3 windows >>> clients. >>> Some of users save the files with uppercase, for example "Xlsx". How >>> can J have Samba to do convert files names into lowercase. >>> I am beginner in Samba. >> Try >> >> case sensitive = no >> short preserve case = no >> preserve case = no >> default case = lower >> >> Volker > Thanks, for your help. > How can I rename old files on linux server with one command? > I would like to get every files and directory names are lowercase. > > Zoli > > -- Alessio Tomelleri Ufficio Tecnico ARPAV - Dipartimento Provinciale di Belluno v. Tomea, 5 - Belluno (BL), 32100 tel. +39437935516 fax. +39043730340 email: atomell...@arpa.veneto.it web : http://www.arpa.veneto.it Registered Linux user: nr.496721 In risposta alla domanda: "Qual'è il gioco più grande, gli scacchi o la dama ?", in tutta franchezza devo privilegiare gli scacchi (W. Banks, Campione del mondo di dama alla cieca). -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
