Re: [Samba] Samba4 member of an another « Samba4 » domain
On 14/04/13 01:37, François Lafont wrote: Hello, Le 13/04/2013 20:24, steve a écrit : You still have to add the objects. Yourself! Ok, if I understand, after a provision of a domain with samba-tool and the --use-rfc2307 option, samba4 can support posixaccount etc. in its database, but I have to add the object class and the mandatory attributes myself. It can do that whether you provision with --use-rfc2307 or not. I believe that it adds the possibility of adding the uid:gid from windows. I've never used windows for this. But, after this: --- samba-tool domain provision --realm=CHEZMOI.PRIV --domain=CHEZMOI \ --server-role=dc --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --adminpass='+toto123' \ --use-rfc2307 ln -s /usr/local/samba/lib/libnss_winbind.so /lib/libnss_winbind.so ln -s /lib/libnss_winbind.so /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 # I had winbind in nsswitch.conf sed -i -r -e 's/^(passwd:.*)$/\1 winbind/g' -e 's/^(group:.*)$/\1 winbind/g' /etc/nsswitch.conf samba --- I have a few users and groups which are already created: # wbinfo -u Administrator Guest krbtgt # wbinfo -g Enterprise Read-Only Domain Controllers Domain Admins Domain Users Domain Guests Domain Computers Domain Controllers Schema Admins Enterprise Admins Group Policy Creator Owners Read-Only Domain Controllers DnsUpdateProxy Must I add objectclass: posixAccount, uid:..., uidNumber:... etc. entries for each account above? And must I add objetclass: posixGroup, gidNumber: ... etc. entries for each group above? If you want to pull uid:gid from AD then you'll need to add uidNumber and gidNumber for users and gidNumber for groups. All users which need to login will need the attributes but there's no need to allocate gidNumber to al the groups. Many of them have no meaning in Linux. e.g. To begin with, just allocate a gidNumber to Domain Users. A good way to decide which gidNumber to allocate is to take the RID of the group and add, say, 2 to keep it well away from local groups. As the RID of Domain Users is 513 then our gidNumber becomes 20513. For users, we allocated our first user uidNumber 332 to avoid collision with the xidnumbers which have to remain in idmap. Each subsequent user increments this value. It's tedious doing this by hand but easy to create an ldif which contains the values to add as and when a new user is created. Which uid/gid numbers should I use? Without posixAccount uid uidNumber etc. entries, the domain accounts are automatically already allied to a uid number that I can see with getent passwd: # getent passwd Guest CHEZMOI\Guest:*:311:312::/home/CHEZMOI/Guest:/bin/false uid=311 although I have done no change in the Guest account.oming from /ur/ Those uid:gid pairs are coming from idmap. idmap is not part of AD and confuses the issue for many of us. If you are going to add more DC's, these uid:gid's will change depending upon which DC you refer to. Probably (almost certainly) not what you want. How choose Samba these uid/gid numbers (e.g 311/312) and how can I choose my uid/gid numbers in order that there is never conflict with uid/gid choose automatically by Samba? That is best answered by looking at: ldbsearch --url=/usr/local/samba/private/idmap.ldb There, you'll see the sids with the xidnumber that Samba has allocated to them. This xidnumber becomes the uid or gid depending upon whether the object is a user, group or both. A basic set of objects has to remain in idmap so leave it as it is after provision. If you add the line idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = Yes to smb.conf (which I believe the provision has already done for you) then any new user or group object that is created will not have an entry in idmap. You are then free to add the necessary uid/gidNumbers to AD. Another problem: just after provision, the /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ repository is already created with particulary settings regarding the unix rights and the alc (with particulary uid/gid numbers). Must I change the (unix/acl) rights of this repository too ? There's another thread here at the moment about how or how not to do that. Some of us have given up on winbind for idmapping. There are easier ways to get rfc2307 from the database which keep the uid:gid consistent independent of which DC is consulted. nss-ldapd is one of them and sssd seems to be gaining ground because of its simplicity. I'm a strong believer in keeping things as simple as possible. Because of this I believe that rfc2307 stuff should always be sourced from AD and we should not use an external idmap Where? I don't see it. Personally, I never succeed in the rfc2307 working, until now. My purpose is to have the same uid/gid numbers between 2 samba4 servers. Sorry, I can't access the list archive at the moment. The thread is called 'Some clarification?' Cheers, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Re: [Samba] [samba4] crash of winbind after ls -l /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol
On Sun, 2013-04-14 at 02:08 +0200, François Lafont wrote: Hi, I used Samba 4.0.5 in Wheezy. Here is that I have done: But there is something curious with the /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ directory: --- # ls -n /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ total 8 drwxrws---+ 4 0 300 4096 Apr 14 01:40 chezmoi.priv --- Which group has the gid 300? The files are owned by the domain administrators group. Winbind doesn't know how to make up a 'user' record for that group yet. --- # wbinfo -g | tr '\n' '\0' | xargs -0 -n 1 wbinfo --group-info CHEZMOI\Enterprise Read-Only Domain Controllers:*:318: CHEZMOI\Domain Admins:*:308: CHEZMOI\Domain Users:*:100: CHEZMOI\Domain Guests:*:312: CHEZMOI\Domain Computers:*:319: CHEZMOI\Domain Controllers:*:320: CHEZMOI\Schema Admins:*:307: CHEZMOI\Enterprise Admins:*:306: CHEZMOI\Group Policy Creator Owners:*:304: CHEZMOI\Read-Only Domain Controllers:*:321: CHEZMOI\DnsUpdateProxy:*:322: --- There is no 300 gid. And, a bit more embarrassing, if I use ls -l to resolv the gid to a name, winbind is crashing: Can you please try to get a gdb backtrace, or better still run 'samba' under valgrind? We would very much like to fix that. You could also file these details in a bug, if we don't sort it out quickly. Thanks, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 4 - problems with name resolution on Windows 7 clients
Am 10.04.2013 19:15, schrieb Matthieu Patou: On 04/10/2013 09:48 AM, X-Dimension wrote: We have a strange name resolution problem on Windows 7 clients. (Windows XP clients are working fine!) If a Windows 7 client is connected more than 7 or 8 hours to our Samba 4 active directory server, we can't do ping servername anymore, but ping servername.domainname works fine. After logout and login again to the Windows 7 clients everything works! Can you check what is the ipconfig /all output on windows 7 clients ? also you should do a tcpdump/wireshark trace on your client to see which DNS request it is doing. The main problem is, that all Windows clients access the samba shares by \\servername\sharename and not \\servername.domainname\sharename and after 7 or 8 hours our users can't access the files or programs on these shares. What goes wrong here and what is the best way to fix this? I can change some GPOs and set all shares to \\servername.domainname\sharename, but if there is a better solution i would prefer this. Thx for help! :) Matthieu. Here is the output of ipconfig /all: Windows-IP-Konfiguration Hostname . . . . . . . . . . . . : Client1 Primäres DNS-Suffix . . . . . . . : mydomain.local Knotentyp . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid IP-Routing aktiviert . . . . . . : Nein WINS-Proxy aktiviert . . . . . . : Nein DNS-Suffixsuchliste . . . . . . . : mydomain.local Ethernet-Adapter LAN-Verbindung: Verbindungsspezifisches DNS-Suffix: Beschreibung. . . . . . . . . . . : vmxnet3 Ethernet Adapter Physikalische Adresse . . . . . . : xx-xx-xx-xx-xx-xx DHCP aktiviert. . . . . . . . . . : Nein Autokonfiguration aktiviert . . . : Ja Verbindungslokale IPv6-Adresse . : :::::%xx(Bevorzugt) IPv4-Adresse . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.235(Bevorzugt) Subnetzmaske . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Standardgateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.5 DNS-Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.200 NetBIOS über TCP/IP . . . . . . . : Aktiviert -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] [samba4] crash of winbind after ls -l /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol
On 14/04/13 07:30, Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Sun, 2013-04-14 at 02:08 +0200, François Lafont wrote: Hi, I used Samba 4.0.5 in Wheezy. Here is that I have done: But there is something curious with the /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ directory: --- # ls -n /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ total 8 drwxrws---+ 4 0 300 4096 Apr 14 01:40 chezmoi.priv --- Which group has the gid 300? The files are owned by the domain administrators group. Winbind doesn't know how to make up a 'user' record for that group yet. In that case, would you like to explain why, if I add a user to Domain Admins and then mount a share as the user from the S4 server via cifs, all the files get saved as user 300? Rowland --- # wbinfo -g | tr '\n' '\0' | xargs -0 -n 1 wbinfo --group-info CHEZMOI\Enterprise Read-Only Domain Controllers:*:318: CHEZMOI\Domain Admins:*:308: CHEZMOI\Domain Users:*:100: CHEZMOI\Domain Guests:*:312: CHEZMOI\Domain Computers:*:319: CHEZMOI\Domain Controllers:*:320: CHEZMOI\Schema Admins:*:307: CHEZMOI\Enterprise Admins:*:306: CHEZMOI\Group Policy Creator Owners:*:304: CHEZMOI\Read-Only Domain Controllers:*:321: CHEZMOI\DnsUpdateProxy:*:322: --- There is no 300 gid. And, a bit more embarrassing, if I use ls -l to resolv the gid to a name, winbind is crashing: Can you please try to get a gdb backtrace, or better still run 'samba' under valgrind? We would very much like to fix that. You could also file these details in a bug, if we don't sort it out quickly. Thanks, Andrew Bartlett -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] sssd getent problem with Samba 4.0
Version 4.0.6-GIT-4bebda4 Hi I have sssd up and running. It works fine except that getent only returns domain users if I specify the object e.g. getent passwd and getent group return only local users but getent passwd steve2 steve2:*:334:20513:steve2:/home/users/steve2:/bin/bash and getent group Domain\ Users Domain Users:*:20513: work fine. /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: compat sss group: compat sss /etc/sssd/sssd.conf [sssd] services = nss, pam config_file_version = 2 domains = default [nss] [pam] [domain/default] access_provider = simple #simple_allow_users = myuser enumerate = false cache_credentials = True id_provider = ldap auth_provider = krb5 chpass_provider = krb5 krb5_realm = HH3.SITE krb5_server = hh16.hh3.site krb5_kpasswd = hh16.hh3.site ldap_uri = ldap://hh16.hh3.site/ ldap_search_base = dc=hh3,dc=site ldap_tls_cacertdir = /usr/local/samba/private/tls ldap_id_use_start_tls = False ldap_default_bind_dn = cn=lynn2,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site ldap_default_authtok = xx ldap_default_authtok_type = password ldap_user_object_class = person ldap_user_name = samAccountName ldap_user_uid_number = uidNumber ldap_user_gid_number = gidNumber ldap_user_home_directory = unixHomeDirectory ldap_user_shell = loginShell ldap_group_object_class = group #ldap_user_search_filter =((objectCategory=User)(uidNumber=*)) I've tried enumerate = true and it works as expected but strangely, only for the first time after sssd is started. it then returns only local users. Any ideas? Cheers, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba4 member of an another « Samba4 » domain
On 14/04/13 07:00, steve wrote: On 14/04/13 01:37, François Lafont wrote: Hello, Le 13/04/2013 20:24, steve a écrit : You still have to add the objects. Yourself! Ok, if I understand, after a provision of a domain with samba-tool and the --use-rfc2307 option, samba4 can support posixaccount etc. in its database, but I have to add the object class and the mandatory attributes myself. It can do that whether you provision with --use-rfc2307 or not. I believe that it adds the possibility of adding the uid:gid from windows. I've never used windows for this. But, after this: --- samba-tool domain provision --realm=CHEZMOI.PRIV --domain=CHEZMOI \ --server-role=dc --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --adminpass='+toto123' \ --use-rfc2307 ln -s /usr/local/samba/lib/libnss_winbind.so /lib/libnss_winbind.so ln -s /lib/libnss_winbind.so /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 # I had winbind in nsswitch.conf sed -i -r -e 's/^(passwd:.*)$/\1 winbind/g' -e 's/^(group:.*)$/\1 winbind/g' /etc/nsswitch.conf samba --- I have a few users and groups which are already created: # wbinfo -u Administrator Guest krbtgt # wbinfo -g Enterprise Read-Only Domain Controllers Domain Admins Domain Users Domain Guests Domain Computers Domain Controllers Schema Admins Enterprise Admins Group Policy Creator Owners Read-Only Domain Controllers DnsUpdateProxy Must I add objectclass: posixAccount, uid:..., uidNumber:... etc. entries for each account above? And must I add objetclass: posixGroup, gidNumber: ... etc. entries for each group above? If you want to pull uid:gid from AD then you'll need to add uidNumber and gidNumber for users and gidNumber for groups. All users which need to login will need the attributes but there's no need to allocate gidNumber to al the groups. Many of them have no meaning in Linux. e.g. To begin with, just allocate a gidNumber to Domain Users. A good way to decide which gidNumber to allocate is to take the RID of the group and add, say, 2 to keep it well away from local groups. As the RID of Domain Users is 513 then our gidNumber becomes 20513. For users, we allocated our first user uidNumber 332 to avoid collision with the xidnumbers which have to remain in idmap. Each subsequent user increments this value. It's tedious doing this by hand but easy to create an ldif which contains the values to add as and when a new user is created. Which uid/gid numbers should I use? Without posixAccount uid uidNumber etc. entries, the domain accounts are automatically already allied to a uid number that I can see with getent passwd: # getent passwd Guest CHEZMOI\Guest:*:311:312::/home/CHEZMOI/Guest:/bin/false uid=311 although I have done no change in the Guest account.oming from /ur/ Those uid:gid pairs are coming from idmap. idmap is not part of AD and confuses the issue for many of us. If you are going to add more DC's, these uid:gid's will change depending upon which DC you refer to. Probably (almost certainly) not what you want. How choose Samba these uid/gid numbers (e.g 311/312) and how can I choose my uid/gid numbers in order that there is never conflict with uid/gid choose automatically by Samba? That is best answered by looking at: ldbsearch --url=/usr/local/samba/private/idmap.ldb There, you'll see the sids with the xidnumber that Samba has allocated to them. This xidnumber becomes the uid or gid depending upon whether the object is a user, group or both. A basic set of objects has to remain in idmap so leave it as it is after provision. If you add the line idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = Yes to smb.conf (which I believe the provision has already done for you) then any new user or group object that is created will not have an entry in idmap. You are then free to add the necessary uid/gidNumbers to AD. Another problem: just after provision, the /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ repository is already created with particulary settings regarding the unix rights and the alc (with particulary uid/gid numbers). Must I change the (unix/acl) rights of this repository too ? There's another thread here at the moment about how or how not to do that. Some of us have given up on winbind for idmapping. There are easier ways to get rfc2307 from the database which keep the uid:gid consistent independent of which DC is consulted. nss-ldapd is one of them and sssd seems to be gaining ground because of its simplicity. I'm a strong believer in keeping things as simple as possible. Because of this I believe that rfc2307 stuff should always be sourced from AD and we should not use an external idmap Where? I don't see it. Personally, I never succeed in the rfc2307 working, until now. My purpose is to have the same uid/gid numbers between 2 samba4 servers. Sorry, I can't access the list archive at the moment. The thread is called 'Some clarification?' Cheers, Steve The
Re: [Samba] sssd getent problem with Samba 4.0
On 14/04/13 09:29, steve wrote: Version 4.0.6-GIT-4bebda4 Hi I have sssd up and running. It works fine except that getent only returns domain users if I specify the object e.g. getent passwd and getent group return only local users but getent passwd steve2 steve2:*:334:20513:steve2:/home/users/steve2:/bin/bash and getent group Domain\ Users Domain Users:*:20513: work fine. This doesn't seem to be a problem. /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: compat sss group: compat sss /etc/sssd/sssd.conf [sssd] services = nss, pam config_file_version = 2 domains = default [nss] [pam] [domain/default] access_provider = simple #simple_allow_users = myuser enumerate = false cache_credentials = True id_provider = ldap auth_provider = krb5 chpass_provider = krb5 krb5_realm = HH3.SITE krb5_server = hh16.hh3.site krb5_kpasswd = hh16.hh3.site ldap_uri = ldap://hh16.hh3.site/ ldap_search_base = dc=hh3,dc=site ldap_tls_cacertdir = /usr/local/samba/private/tls ldap_id_use_start_tls = False ldap_default_bind_dn = cn=lynn2,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site ldap_default_authtok = xx ldap_default_authtok_type = password ldap_user_object_class = person ldap_user_name = samAccountName ldap_user_uid_number = uidNumber ldap_user_gid_number = gidNumber ldap_user_home_directory = unixHomeDirectory ldap_user_shell = loginShell ldap_group_object_class = group #ldap_user_search_filter =((objectCategory=User)(uidNumber=*)) I've tried enumerate = true and it works as expected but strangely, only for the first time after sssd is started. it then returns only local users. I have never tried it myself, the sssd wiki recommends not setting 'enumerate = true' until everything else is working and then not on a large domain. Any ideas? Cheers, Steve Here is my sssd.conf [sssd] debug_level = 0x0270 config_file_version = 2 sbus_timeout = 30 domains = domain.tld services = nss, pam [nss] debug_level = 0x0270 [pam] debug_level = 0x0270 [domain/domain.tld] debug_level = 0x0270 description = AD domain with Samba 4 server cache_credentials = true id_provider = ldap auth_provider = krb5 chpass_provider = krb5 access_provider = ldap # Uncomment if dns discovery of your AD servers isn't working. krb5_server = server.domain.tld krb5_kpasswd = server.domain.tld krb5_realm = DOMAIN.TLD ldap_referrals = false # Comment out if not using SASL/GSSAPI to bind ldap_sasl_mech = GSSAPI ldap_schema = rfc2307bis ldap_access_order = expire ldap_account_expire_policy = ad ldap_force_upper_case_realm = true ldap_user_search_base = dc=domain,dc=tld ldap_user_object_class = user ldap_user_name = sAMAccountName ldap_user_uid_number = uidNumber ldap_user_gid_number = gidNumber ldap_user_home_directory = unixHomeDirectory ldap_user_shell = loginShell ldap_user_principal = userPrincipalName ldap_group_search_base = dc=domain,dc=tld ldap_group_object_class = group ldap_group_name = sAMAccountName ldap_group_gid_number = gidNumber Rowland -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] tests failing on Debian Squeeze
On 14/04/13 06:48, Matthieu Patou wrote: On 04/12/2013 05:11 PM, Geoff Crompton wrote: FAILED (318 failures, 7 errors and 0 unexpected successes in 431 testsuites) A summary with detailed information can be found in: ./st/summary ERROR: test failed with exit code 1 make: *** [test] Error 1 How important is it for all the tests to pass? Should I just press on with a 'sudo make install'? No it's ok but in the same time if you could file a bug for each failing test so that we can start to have a look at fixing them. Hi Matthieu, Thanks for your response. The summary suggests there are over 300 failed tests. Do you really want over 300 bug submissions? If so, I'll have to work out how to automate that (maybe with https://github.com/LegNeato/bztools). What kind of extra information is useful along with these bug reports? I'm assuming on each one you'd want the relevant section of the ./st/summary file, and mention the environment it was run in (distribution, installed packages and their versions). Is there a script in the samba tree to extract from the system this summary? Cheers, Geoff -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] sssd getent problem with Samba 4.0
On 14/04/13 10:59, Rowland Penny wrote: On 14/04/13 09:29, steve wrote: Version 4.0.6-GIT-4bebda4 Hi I have sssd up and running. It works fine except that getent only returns domain users if I specify the object e.g. getent passwd and getent group return only local users but getent passwd steve2 steve2:*:334:20513:steve2:/home/users/steve2:/bin/bash and getent group Domain\ Users Domain Users:*:20513: work fine. This doesn't seem to be a problem. /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: compat sss group: compat sss /etc/sssd/sssd.conf [sssd] services = nss, pam config_file_version = 2 domains = default [nss] [pam] [domain/default] access_provider = simple #simple_allow_users = myuser enumerate = false cache_credentials = True id_provider = ldap auth_provider = krb5 chpass_provider = krb5 krb5_realm = HH3.SITE krb5_server = hh16.hh3.site krb5_kpasswd = hh16.hh3.site ldap_uri = ldap://hh16.hh3.site/ ldap_search_base = dc=hh3,dc=site ldap_tls_cacertdir = /usr/local/samba/private/tls ldap_id_use_start_tls = False ldap_default_bind_dn = cn=lynn2,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site ldap_default_authtok = xx ldap_default_authtok_type = password ldap_user_object_class = person ldap_user_name = samAccountName ldap_user_uid_number = uidNumber ldap_user_gid_number = gidNumber ldap_user_home_directory = unixHomeDirectory ldap_user_shell = loginShell ldap_group_object_class = group #ldap_user_search_filter =((objectCategory=User)(uidNumber=*)) I've tried enumerate = true and it works as expected but strangely, only for the first time after sssd is started. it then returns only local users. I have never tried it myself, the sssd wiki recommends not setting 'enumerate = true' until everything else is working and then not on a large domain. Any ideas? Cheers, Steve Here is my sssd.conf [sssd] debug_level = 0x0270 config_file_version = 2 sbus_timeout = 30 domains = domain.tld services = nss, pam [nss] debug_level = 0x0270 [pam] debug_level = 0x0270 [domain/domain.tld] debug_level = 0x0270 description = AD domain with Samba 4 server cache_credentials = true id_provider = ldap auth_provider = krb5 chpass_provider = krb5 access_provider = ldap # Uncomment if dns discovery of your AD servers isn't working. krb5_server = server.domain.tld krb5_kpasswd = server.domain.tld krb5_realm = DOMAIN.TLD ldap_referrals = false # Comment out if not using SASL/GSSAPI to bind ldap_sasl_mech = GSSAPI ldap_schema = rfc2307bis ldap_access_order = expire ldap_account_expire_policy = ad ldap_force_upper_case_realm = true ldap_user_search_base = dc=domain,dc=tld ldap_user_object_class = user ldap_user_name = sAMAccountName ldap_user_uid_number = uidNumber ldap_user_gid_number = gidNumber ldap_user_home_directory = unixHomeDirectory ldap_user_shell = loginShell ldap_user_principal = userPrincipalName ldap_group_search_base = dc=domain,dc=tld ldap_group_object_class = group ldap_group_name = sAMAccountName ldap_group_gid_number = gidNumber Rowland Hi Rowland Thanks. I can live with the getent thing. The other worry I have is that it seems to work without any sort of authentication. If I comment out all this lot: #ldap_tls_cacertdir = /usr/local/samba/private/tls #ldap_id_use_start_tls = true #ldap_default_bind_dn = cn=steve2,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site #ldap_default_authtok = s2 #ldap_default_authtok_type = password #ldap_sasl_mech = GSSAPI It still works. Users can still log in and getent passwd user works too! There seems to be no security check made. Is there a cache I need to clear? nscd is not running. I've tried starting and stopping everything and even rebooted but still is works without any authentication. Worrying. . . Cheers, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] [samba4] crash of winbind after ls -l /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol
Le 14/04/2013 08:30, Andrew Bartlett a écrit : --- # ls -n /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ total 8 drwxrws---+ 4 0 300 4096 Apr 14 01:40 chezmoi.priv --- Which group has the gid 300? The files are owned by the domain administrators group. Do you mean the CN=Administrators,CN=Builtin,DC=chezmoi,DC=priv group? Why don't this group appear with the wbinfo -g command? --- # wbinfo -g Enterprise Read-Only Domain Controllers Domain Admins Domain Users Domain Guests Domain Computers Domain Controllers Schema Admins Enterprise Admins Group Policy Creator Owners Read-Only Domain Controllers --- Winbind doesn't know how to make up a 'user' record for that group yet. And it's not a normal behavior, isn't it? Can you please try to get a gdb backtrace, or better still run 'samba' under valgrind? We would very much like to fix that. Sorry, I don't know how to do that, I'm a samba beginner. I'm going to search, meanwhile, here is the ouput of the samba -i -M single -d 10 command during the ls -l /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ problem. Thanks for your help. -- François Lafont -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] sssd getent problem with Samba 4.0
On 14/04/13 11:58, steve wrote: On 14/04/13 10:59, Rowland Penny wrote: On 14/04/13 09:29, steve wrote: Version 4.0.6-GIT-4bebda4 Hi I have sssd up and running. It works fine except that getent only returns domain users if I specify the object e.g. getent passwd and getent group return only local users but getent passwd steve2 steve2:*:334:20513:steve2:/home/users/steve2:/bin/bash and getent group Domain\ Users Domain Users:*:20513: work fine. This doesn't seem to be a problem. /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: compat sss group: compat sss /etc/sssd/sssd.conf [sssd] services = nss, pam config_file_version = 2 domains = default [nss] [pam] [domain/default] access_provider = simple #simple_allow_users = myuser enumerate = false cache_credentials = True id_provider = ldap auth_provider = krb5 chpass_provider = krb5 krb5_realm = HH3.SITE krb5_server = hh16.hh3.site krb5_kpasswd = hh16.hh3.site ldap_uri = ldap://hh16.hh3.site/ ldap_search_base = dc=hh3,dc=site ldap_tls_cacertdir = /usr/local/samba/private/tls ldap_id_use_start_tls = False ldap_default_bind_dn = cn=lynn2,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site ldap_default_authtok = xx ldap_default_authtok_type = password ldap_user_object_class = person ldap_user_name = samAccountName ldap_user_uid_number = uidNumber ldap_user_gid_number = gidNumber ldap_user_home_directory = unixHomeDirectory ldap_user_shell = loginShell ldap_group_object_class = group #ldap_user_search_filter =((objectCategory=User)(uidNumber=*)) I've tried enumerate = true and it works as expected but strangely, only for the first time after sssd is started. it then returns only local users. I have never tried it myself, the sssd wiki recommends not setting 'enumerate = true' until everything else is working and then not on a large domain. Any ideas? Cheers, Steve Here is my sssd.conf [sssd] debug_level = 0x0270 config_file_version = 2 sbus_timeout = 30 domains = domain.tld services = nss, pam [nss] debug_level = 0x0270 [pam] debug_level = 0x0270 [domain/domain.tld] debug_level = 0x0270 description = AD domain with Samba 4 server cache_credentials = true id_provider = ldap auth_provider = krb5 chpass_provider = krb5 access_provider = ldap # Uncomment if dns discovery of your AD servers isn't working. krb5_server = server.domain.tld krb5_kpasswd = server.domain.tld krb5_realm = DOMAIN.TLD ldap_referrals = false # Comment out if not using SASL/GSSAPI to bind ldap_sasl_mech = GSSAPI ldap_schema = rfc2307bis ldap_access_order = expire ldap_account_expire_policy = ad ldap_force_upper_case_realm = true ldap_user_search_base = dc=domain,dc=tld ldap_user_object_class = user ldap_user_name = sAMAccountName ldap_user_uid_number = uidNumber ldap_user_gid_number = gidNumber ldap_user_home_directory = unixHomeDirectory ldap_user_shell = loginShell ldap_user_principal = userPrincipalName ldap_group_search_base = dc=domain,dc=tld ldap_group_object_class = group ldap_group_name = sAMAccountName ldap_group_gid_number = gidNumber Rowland Hi Rowland Thanks. I can live with the getent thing. The other worry I have is that it seems to work without any sort of authentication. If I comment out all this lot: #ldap_tls_cacertdir = /usr/local/samba/private/tls #ldap_id_use_start_tls = true #ldap_default_bind_dn = cn=steve2,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site #ldap_default_authtok = s2 #ldap_default_authtok_type = password #ldap_sasl_mech = GSSAPI It still works. Users can still log in and getent passwd user works too! There seems to be no security check made. Is there a cache I need to clear? nscd is not running. I've tried starting and stopping everything and even rebooted but still is works without any authentication. Worrying. . . Cheers, Steve Hi Steve, I seem to remember reading on the sssd mailing list that sssd uses a kerberos cache but the cache is stored in memory. When a user logs in they get their own cache in /tmp with the format 'krb5_uidNumber_XX' There is another cache in /var/lib/sss/db/ When they get the ad backend to work, you will find that the sssd conf gets to be even smaller, you do not need any of the ldap lines. Rowland -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] [samba4] crash of winbind after ls -l /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol
Le 14/04/2013 13:49, François Lafont a écrit : I'm going to search, meanwhile, here is the ouput of the samba -i -M single -d 10 command during the ls -l /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ problem. Ooups! Sorry I have forgotten the url address: http://sisco.laf.free.fr/codes/samba4_gid_300.log -- François Lafont -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] sssd getent problem with Samba 4.0
On 14/04/13 13:50, Rowland Penny wrote: On 14/04/13 11:58, steve wrote: On 14/04/13 10:59, Rowland Penny wrote: On 14/04/13 09:29, steve wrote: Version 4.0.6-GIT-4bebda4 Hi I have sssd up and running. It works fine except that getent only returns domain users if I specify the object e.g. getent passwd and getent group return only local users but getent passwd steve2 steve2:*:334:20513:steve2:/home/users/steve2:/bin/bash and getent group Domain\ Users Domain Users:*:20513: work fine. This doesn't seem to be a problem. /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: compat sss group: compat sss /etc/sssd/sssd.conf [sssd] services = nss, pam config_file_version = 2 domains = default [nss] [pam] [domain/default] access_provider = simple #simple_allow_users = myuser enumerate = false cache_credentials = True id_provider = ldap auth_provider = krb5 chpass_provider = krb5 krb5_realm = HH3.SITE krb5_server = hh16.hh3.site krb5_kpasswd = hh16.hh3.site ldap_uri = ldap://hh16.hh3.site/ ldap_search_base = dc=hh3,dc=site ldap_tls_cacertdir = /usr/local/samba/private/tls ldap_id_use_start_tls = False ldap_default_bind_dn = cn=lynn2,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site ldap_default_authtok = xx ldap_default_authtok_type = password ldap_user_object_class = person ldap_user_name = samAccountName ldap_user_uid_number = uidNumber ldap_user_gid_number = gidNumber ldap_user_home_directory = unixHomeDirectory ldap_user_shell = loginShell ldap_group_object_class = group #ldap_user_search_filter =((objectCategory=User)(uidNumber=*)) I've tried enumerate = true and it works as expected but strangely, only for the first time after sssd is started. it then returns only local users. I have never tried it myself, the sssd wiki recommends not setting 'enumerate = true' until everything else is working and then not on a large domain. Any ideas? Cheers, Steve Here is my sssd.conf [sssd] debug_level = 0x0270 config_file_version = 2 sbus_timeout = 30 domains = domain.tld services = nss, pam [nss] debug_level = 0x0270 [pam] debug_level = 0x0270 [domain/domain.tld] debug_level = 0x0270 description = AD domain with Samba 4 server cache_credentials = true id_provider = ldap auth_provider = krb5 chpass_provider = krb5 access_provider = ldap # Uncomment if dns discovery of your AD servers isn't working. krb5_server = server.domain.tld krb5_kpasswd = server.domain.tld krb5_realm = DOMAIN.TLD ldap_referrals = false # Comment out if not using SASL/GSSAPI to bind ldap_sasl_mech = GSSAPI ldap_schema = rfc2307bis ldap_access_order = expire ldap_account_expire_policy = ad ldap_force_upper_case_realm = true ldap_user_search_base = dc=domain,dc=tld ldap_user_object_class = user ldap_user_name = sAMAccountName ldap_user_uid_number = uidNumber ldap_user_gid_number = gidNumber ldap_user_home_directory = unixHomeDirectory ldap_user_shell = loginShell ldap_user_principal = userPrincipalName ldap_group_search_base = dc=domain,dc=tld ldap_group_object_class = group ldap_group_name = sAMAccountName ldap_group_gid_number = gidNumber Rowland Hi Rowland Thanks. I can live with the getent thing. The other worry I have is that it seems to work without any sort of authentication. If I comment out all this lot: #ldap_tls_cacertdir = /usr/local/samba/private/tls #ldap_id_use_start_tls = true #ldap_default_bind_dn = cn=steve2,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site #ldap_default_authtok = s2 #ldap_default_authtok_type = password #ldap_sasl_mech = GSSAPI It still works. Users can still log in and getent passwd user works too! There seems to be no security check made. Is there a cache I need to clear? nscd is not running. I've tried starting and stopping everything and even rebooted but still is works without any authentication. Worrying. . . Cheers, Steve Hi Steve, I seem to remember reading on the sssd mailing list that sssd uses a kerberos cache but the cache is stored in memory. When a user logs in they get their own cache in /tmp with the format 'krb5_uidNumber_XX' There is another cache in /var/lib/sss/db/ When they get the ad backend to work, you will find that the sssd conf gets to be even smaller, you do not need any of the ldap lines. Rowland Hi Rowland Thanks. I deleted user cache's under /tmp which had been created during me messing around, whereupon no one could get anywhere near it. I then configured gssapi/sasl, and now it's bulletproof without any passwords flying around. I got confused by your sssd.conf file. It has: ldap_sasl_mech = GSSAPI but nothing configured. I used the machine key of the client for the auth_id which is already in the default keytab when you join the domain. I must say that I'm impressed by the simplicity of sssd. Just one slower bit I've found is that using gssapi under nss-ldapd, the key is cached under /tmp. With sssd, it seems to query for the (in my case) machine key for every action it makes. Otherwise, fresh air. Cheers, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following
Re: [Samba] sssd getent problem with Samba 4.0
On 14/04/13 14:28, steve wrote: On 14/04/13 13:50, Rowland Penny wrote: On 14/04/13 11:58, steve wrote: On 14/04/13 10:59, Rowland Penny wrote: On 14/04/13 09:29, steve wrote: Version 4.0.6-GIT-4bebda4 Hi I have sssd up and running. It works fine except that getent only returns domain users if I specify the object e.g. getent passwd and getent group return only local users but getent passwd steve2 steve2:*:334:20513:steve2:/home/users/steve2:/bin/bash and getent group Domain\ Users Domain Users:*:20513: work fine. This doesn't seem to be a problem. /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: compat sss group: compat sss /etc/sssd/sssd.conf [sssd] services = nss, pam config_file_version = 2 domains = default [nss] [pam] [domain/default] access_provider = simple #simple_allow_users = myuser enumerate = false cache_credentials = True id_provider = ldap auth_provider = krb5 chpass_provider = krb5 krb5_realm = HH3.SITE krb5_server = hh16.hh3.site krb5_kpasswd = hh16.hh3.site ldap_uri = ldap://hh16.hh3.site/ ldap_search_base = dc=hh3,dc=site ldap_tls_cacertdir = /usr/local/samba/private/tls ldap_id_use_start_tls = False ldap_default_bind_dn = cn=lynn2,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site ldap_default_authtok = xx ldap_default_authtok_type = password ldap_user_object_class = person ldap_user_name = samAccountName ldap_user_uid_number = uidNumber ldap_user_gid_number = gidNumber ldap_user_home_directory = unixHomeDirectory ldap_user_shell = loginShell ldap_group_object_class = group #ldap_user_search_filter =((objectCategory=User)(uidNumber=*)) I've tried enumerate = true and it works as expected but strangely, only for the first time after sssd is started. it then returns only local users. I have never tried it myself, the sssd wiki recommends not setting 'enumerate = true' until everything else is working and then not on a large domain. Any ideas? Cheers, Steve Here is my sssd.conf [sssd] debug_level = 0x0270 config_file_version = 2 sbus_timeout = 30 domains = domain.tld services = nss, pam [nss] debug_level = 0x0270 [pam] debug_level = 0x0270 [domain/domain.tld] debug_level = 0x0270 description = AD domain with Samba 4 server cache_credentials = true id_provider = ldap auth_provider = krb5 chpass_provider = krb5 access_provider = ldap # Uncomment if dns discovery of your AD servers isn't working. krb5_server = server.domain.tld krb5_kpasswd = server.domain.tld krb5_realm = DOMAIN.TLD ldap_referrals = false # Comment out if not using SASL/GSSAPI to bind ldap_sasl_mech = GSSAPI ldap_schema = rfc2307bis ldap_access_order = expire ldap_account_expire_policy = ad ldap_force_upper_case_realm = true ldap_user_search_base = dc=domain,dc=tld ldap_user_object_class = user ldap_user_name = sAMAccountName ldap_user_uid_number = uidNumber ldap_user_gid_number = gidNumber ldap_user_home_directory = unixHomeDirectory ldap_user_shell = loginShell ldap_user_principal = userPrincipalName ldap_group_search_base = dc=domain,dc=tld ldap_group_object_class = group ldap_group_name = sAMAccountName ldap_group_gid_number = gidNumber Rowland Hi Rowland Thanks. I can live with the getent thing. The other worry I have is that it seems to work without any sort of authentication. If I comment out all this lot: #ldap_tls_cacertdir = /usr/local/samba/private/tls #ldap_id_use_start_tls = true #ldap_default_bind_dn = cn=steve2,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site #ldap_default_authtok = s2 #ldap_default_authtok_type = password #ldap_sasl_mech = GSSAPI It still works. Users can still log in and getent passwd user works too! There seems to be no security check made. Is there a cache I need to clear? nscd is not running. I've tried starting and stopping everything and even rebooted but still is works without any authentication. Worrying. . . Cheers, Steve Hi Steve, I seem to remember reading on the sssd mailing list that sssd uses a kerberos cache but the cache is stored in memory. When a user logs in they get their own cache in /tmp with the format 'krb5_uidNumber_XX' There is another cache in /var/lib/sss/db/ When they get the ad backend to work, you will find that the sssd conf gets to be even smaller, you do not need any of the ldap lines. Rowland Hi Rowland Thanks. I deleted user cache's under /tmp which had been created during me messing around, whereupon no one could get anywhere near it. I then configured gssapi/sasl, and now it's bulletproof without any passwords flying around. I got confused by your sssd.conf file. It has: ldap_sasl_mech = GSSAPI but nothing configured. I used the machine key of the client for the auth_id which is already in the default keytab when you join the domain. I must say that I'm impressed by the simplicity of sssd. Just one slower bit I've found is that using gssapi under nss-ldapd, the key is cached under /tmp. With sssd, it seems to query for the (in my case) machine key for every action it makes. Otherwise, fresh air. Cheers, Steve Hi Steve, just a quick
Re: [Samba] sssd getent problem with Samba 4.0
G On 14/04/13 16:09, Rowland Penny wrote: On 14/04/13 14:28, steve wrote: On 14/04/13 13:50, Rowland Penny wrote: On 14/04/13 11:58, steve wrote: On 14/04/13 10:59, Rowland Penny wrote: On 14/04/13 09:29, steve wrote: Version 4.0.6-GIT-4bebda4 Hi I have sssd up and running. It works fine except that getent only returns domain users if I specify the object e.g. getent passwd and getent group return only local users but getent passwd steve2 steve2:*:334:20513:steve2:/home/users/steve2:/bin/bash and getent group Domain\ Users Domain Users:*:20513: work fine. This doesn't seem to be a problem. /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: compat sss group: compat sss /etc/sssd/sssd.conf [sssd] services = nss, pam config_file_version = 2 domains = default [nss] [pam] [domain/default] access_provider = simple #simple_allow_users = myuser enumerate = false cache_credentials = True id_provider = ldap auth_provider = krb5 chpass_provider = krb5 krb5_realm = HH3.SITE krb5_server = hh16.hh3.site krb5_kpasswd = hh16.hh3.site ldap_uri = ldap://hh16.hh3.site/ ldap_search_base = dc=hh3,dc=site ldap_tls_cacertdir = /usr/local/samba/private/tls ldap_id_use_start_tls = False ldap_default_bind_dn = cn=lynn2,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site ldap_default_authtok = xx ldap_default_authtok_type = password ldap_user_object_class = person ldap_user_name = samAccountName ldap_user_uid_number = uidNumber ldap_user_gid_number = gidNumber ldap_user_home_directory = unixHomeDirectory ldap_user_shell = loginShell ldap_group_object_class = group #ldap_user_search_filter =((objectCategory=User)(uidNumber=*)) I've tried enumerate = true and it works as expected but strangely, only for the first time after sssd is started. it then returns only local users. I have never tried it myself, the sssd wiki recommends not setting 'enumerate = true' until everything else is working and then not on a large domain. Any ideas? Cheers, Steve Here is my sssd.conf [sssd] debug_level = 0x0270 config_file_version = 2 sbus_timeout = 30 domains = domain.tld services = nss, pam [nss] debug_level = 0x0270 [pam] debug_level = 0x0270 [domain/domain.tld] debug_level = 0x0270 description = AD domain with Samba 4 server cache_credentials = true id_provider = ldap auth_provider = krb5 chpass_provider = krb5 access_provider = ldap # Uncomment if dns discovery of your AD servers isn't working. krb5_server = server.domain.tld krb5_kpasswd = server.domain.tld krb5_realm = DOMAIN.TLD ldap_referrals = false # Comment out if not using SASL/GSSAPI to bind ldap_sasl_mech = GSSAPI ldap_schema = rfc2307bis ldap_access_order = expire ldap_account_expire_policy = ad ldap_force_upper_case_realm = true ldap_user_search_base = dc=domain,dc=tld ldap_user_object_class = user ldap_user_name = sAMAccountName ldap_user_uid_number = uidNumber ldap_user_gid_number = gidNumber ldap_user_home_directory = unixHomeDirectory ldap_user_shell = loginShell ldap_user_principal = userPrincipalName ldap_group_search_base = dc=domain,dc=tld ldap_group_object_class = group ldap_group_name = sAMAccountName ldap_group_gid_number = gidNumber Rowland Hi Rowland Thanks. I can live with the getent thing. The other worry I have is that it seems to work without any sort of authentication. If I comment out all this lot: #ldap_tls_cacertdir = /usr/local/samba/private/tls #ldap_id_use_start_tls = true #ldap_default_bind_dn = cn=steve2,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site #ldap_default_authtok = s2 #ldap_default_authtok_type = password #ldap_sasl_mech = GSSAPI It still works. Users can still log in and getent passwd user works too! There seems to be no security check made. Is there a cache I need to clear? nscd is not running. I've tried starting and stopping everything and even rebooted but still is works without any authentication. Worrying. . . Cheers, Steve Hi Steve, I seem to remember reading on the sssd mailing list that sssd uses a kerberos cache but the cache is stored in memory. When a user logs in they get their own cache in /tmp with the format 'krb5_uidNumber_XX' There is another cache in /var/lib/sss/db/ When they get the ad backend to work, you will find that the sssd conf gets to be even smaller, you do not need any of the ldap lines. Rowland Hi Rowland Thanks. I deleted user cache's under /tmp which had been created during me messing around, whereupon no one could get anywhere near it. I then configured gssapi/sasl, and now it's bulletproof without any passwords flying around. I got confused by your sssd.conf file. It has: ldap_sasl_mech = GSSAPI but nothing configured. I used the machine key of the client for the auth_id which is already in the default keytab when you join the domain. I must say that I'm impressed by the simplicity of sssd. Just one slower bit I've found is that using gssapi under nss-ldapd, the key is cached under /tmp. With sssd, it seems to query for the (in my case) machine key for every action it makes. Otherwise, fresh
Re: [Samba] tests failing on Debian Squeeze
On Sat, 2013-04-13 at 10:11 +1000, Geoff Crompton wrote: Hi, I'm trying to get samba4 4.0.5 tarball to run on a Debian Squeeze Virtual Machine. I've done a local build, and I've included the --enable-debug --enable-selftest switches. I've done a 'make test', and I get told there are quite a lot of failures. It ends by saying: FAILED (318 failures, 7 errors and 0 unexpected successes in 431 testsuites) A summary with detailed information can be found in: ./st/summary ERROR: test failed with exit code 1 make: *** [test] Error 1 How important is it for all the tests to pass? Should I just press on with a 'sudo make install'? It's not good, but without seeing them it's rather hard to say more than that. Our tests are highly inter-dependent, so this is probably one or two tests that really go awry, and 300 tests that fail because the server process they run against has died. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] sssd getent problem with Samba 4.0
Le 14/04/2013 17:37, steve a écrit : ve even got getent group to list not only the gidNumber, but group members too:) I'll test an Ubuntu client tomorrow, but it's looking good. Maybe I'll put some doco together. Steve Don't you need enumerate = true in sssd.conf ? Just an idea -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] sssd getent problem with Samba 4.0
On 14/04/13 21:22, Eric PEYREMORTE wrote: Le 14/04/2013 17:37, steve a écrit : ve even got getent group to list not only the gidNumber, but group members too:) I'll test an Ubuntu client tomorrow, but it's looking good. Maybe I'll put some together. Steve Don't you need enumerate = true in sssd.conf ? Just an idea Hi Yes we tried that. It works for the first time after the restart but then fails upon subsequent attempts. We've tried leaving it running for the cache/buffer to fill but still nada. Maybe it's time to get over on the sssd list. I'll report back here if I get any progress on it. Cheers, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Python UCS2 vs UCS4 issue on latest git: ImportError: ....undefined symbol: PyUnicodeUCS2_Decode (SOLVED!)
OMG... I fixed it. Since libgnutls.so.26 was in /usr/local/lib and not in /usr/local/samba/lib, I added a file called gnutls.conf to /etc/ld.conf.d/ with the following entry: /usr/local/lib I then did an ldconfig and now it seems to work! System programs like yum which appear to rely on the older version of Python work just fine. Let me know if you need more info or want me to try any additional testing to try and extract more detailed information to potentially improve the installation process or otherwise keep this from happening to other users. After this experience, I'm happy to play a small part in helping others avoid this sort of misery. Well, I just learned something. And a word of advice to anyone else reading this thread... don't mess with your Python installation unless you know what you're doing. ..and if you're contemplating messing with your Python installation... you probably don't. :) Many, MANY thanks Andrew for taking your valuable time to try and help me get this running as well as everyone else who chimed in with comments trying to help. Best regards, - Phil -- View this message in context: http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/Re-Python-UCS2-vs-UCS4-issue-on-latest-git-ImportError-undefined-symbol-PyUnicodeUCS2-Decode-NOT-SOL-tp4646314p4646745.html Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Sysvol replication
Hi all, Has anyone actually got sysvol replication working between 2 (or more) Samba4 DCs? I've tried gluster, inosync, csync and rsync and keep getting stuck on issues with the extended attributes. Is there a roadmap or any clues of a date when MSFRS or DFS replication will be part of Samb4? thanks again, Jim -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] tests failing on Debian Squeeze
On 15/04/13 04:59, Andrew Bartlett wrote: How important is it for all the tests to pass? Should I just press on with a 'sudo make install'? It's not good, but without seeing them it's rather hard to say more than that. Our tests are highly inter-dependent, so this is probably one or two tests that really go awry, and 300 tests that fail because the server process they run against has died. Andrew Bartlett I've submitted bug 9793, https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9793 so you can have a look at the test results. Cheers, Geoff -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba4 member of an another « Samba4 » domain
Le 14/04/2013 08:00, steve a écrit : Ok, if I understand, after a provision of a domain with samba-tool and the --use-rfc2307 option, samba4 can support posixaccount etc. in its database, but I have to add the object class and the mandatory attributes myself. It can do that whether you provision with --use-rfc2307 or not. Are you sure? In this case, I won't use this option. I believe that it adds the possibility of adding the uid:gid from windows. I've never used windows for this. Me too. I prefer to manage the AD in the samba server. If you want to pull uid:gid from AD then you'll need to add uidNumber and gidNumber for users and gidNumber for groups. And memberUid too for groups, isn't it? All users which need to login will need the attributes but there's no need to allocate gidNumber to al the groups. Many of them have no meaning in Linux. e.g. To begin with, just allocate a gidNumber to Domain Users. A good way to decide which gidNumber to allocate is to take the RID of the group and add, say, 2 to keep it well away from local groups. As the RID of Domain Users is 513 then our gidNumber becomes 20513. For users, we allocated our first user uidNumber 332 to avoid collision with the xidnumbers which have to remain in idmap. I don't think that 332 is a good uidNumber because idmap seems to use the 300-400 range. # getent passwd Guest CHEZMOI\Guest:*:311:312::/home/CHEZMOI/Guest:/bin/false uid=311 although I have done no change in the Guest account.oming from /ur/ Those uid:gid pairs are coming from idmap. idmap is not part of AD and confuses the issue for many of us. If you are going to add more DC's, these uid:gid's will change depending upon which DC you refer to. Probably (almost certainly) not what you want. Absolutely. :) How choose Samba these uid/gid numbers (e.g 311/312) and how can I choose my uid/gid numbers in order that there is never conflict with uid/gid choose automatically by Samba? That is best answered by looking at: ldbsearch --url=/usr/local/samba/private/idmap.ldb Ok, it's a good answer indeed. And I can see: # ldbsearch --url=/usr/local/samba/private/idmap.ldb cn=config # record 1 dn: CN=CONFIG cn: CONFIG lowerBound: 300 upperBound: 400 xidNumber: 317 distinguishedName: CN=CONFIG Then, I understand that idmap uses the 300-400 range to assign xidNumber to the users and groups. There, you'll see the sids with the xidnumber that Samba has allocated to them. This xidnumber becomes the uid or gid depending upon whether the object is a user, group or both. A basic set of objects has to remain in idmap so leave it as it is after provision. If you add the line idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = Yes to smb.conf (which I believe the provision has already done for you) then any new user or group object that is created will not have an entry in idmap. You are then free to add the necessary uid/gidNumbers to AD. Yes, indeed: # grep 'rfc' /usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes # samba # samba-tool user add test4 test4 User 'test4' created successfully # ldbsearch --url=/usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb cn=test4 | grep -i objectsid objectSid: S-1-5-21-3840058276-1254623269-3939424142-1106 # ldbsearch --url=/usr/local/samba/private/idmap.ldb cn=S-1-5-21-3840058276-1254623269-3939424142-1106 # returned 0 records # 0 entries # 0 referrals But after this: # getent passwd test4 CHEZMOI\test4:*:319:100::/home/CHEZMOI/test4:/bin/false the idmap entry is automatically created: # ldbsearch --url=/usr/local/samba/private/idmap.ldb cn=S-1-5-21-3840058276-1254623269-3939424142-1106 # record 1 dn: CN=S-1-5-21-3840058276-1254623269-3939424142-1106 cn: S-1-5-21-3840058276-1254623269-3939424142-1106 objectClass: sidMap objectSid: S-1-5-21-3840058276-1254623269-3939424142-1106 type: ID_TYPE_BOTH xidNumber: 319 distinguishedName: CN=S-1-5-21-3840058276-1254623269-3939424142-1106 I have noticed that I have exactly the same behavior without the idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes option. Then, I don't see exactly the meaning of this option... Sorry, I can't access the list archive at the moment. The thread is called 'Some clarification?' Ok, I see. Thanks a lot for yours explanations Steeve. It's become more clean in my mind. :) -- François Lafont -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] file share necessary?
On https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO#Setup_a_basic_File_Share the instructions says For the server to be useful you, will need to update it to have at least one share What do you need a file share for the server to be useful? Isn't a domain controller 'useful' to authenticate machines and users even if it doesn't have a file share? I would have thought that this step would be optional, like the NTP step just above it. Cheers, Geoff -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba4 member of an another « Samba4 » domain
On 15/04/13 03:17, François Lafont wrote: Le 14/04/2013 08:00, steve a écrit : Ok, if I understand, after a provision of a domain with samba-tool and the --use-rfc2307 option, samba4 can support posixaccount etc. in its database, but I have to add the object class and the mandatory attributes myself. It can do that whether you provision with --use-rfc2307 or not. Are you sure? In this case, I won't use this option. 99.99% it's just adding a bit to the schema so that you can add rfc2307 bits from windows. I always do that from Linux can anyone add the 0.01% for us? I believe that it adds the possibility of adding the uid:gid from windows. I've never used windows for this. Me too. I prefer to manage the AD in the samba server. If you want to pull uid:gid from AD then you'll need to add uidNumber and gidNumber for users and gidNumber for groups. And memberUid too for groups, isn't it? No. AD uses the member attribute. Here is a group called staff where steve2 is its only member: # record 1 dn: CN=staff,CN=Users,DC=hh3,DC=site cn: staff instanceType: 4 whenCreated: 20130414144050.0Z uSNCreated: 3795 name: staff objectGUID: 5267385f-c466-41f1-be7c-dddcb4640a33 objectSid: S-1-5-21-1555648365-2472922434-3126067274-1118 sAMAccountName: staff sAMAccountType: 268435456 groupType: -2147483646 objectCategory: CN=Group,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=hh3,DC=site objectClass: top objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: group gidNumber: 21118 member: CN=steve2,CN=Users,DC=hh3,DC=site whenChanged: 20130414144415.0Z uSNChanged: 3799 distinguishedName: CN=staff,CN=Users,DC=hh3,DC=site The good news is that all that samba-tool looks after all this for you: samba-tool group addmembers staff steve2 You can use e.g. sssd to pull the info: getent group staff staff:*:21118:steve2 All users which need to login will need the attributes but there's no need to allocate gidNumber to al the groups. Many of them have no meaning in Linux. e.g. To begin with, just allocate a gidNumber to Domain Users. A good way to decide which gidNumber to allocate is to take the RID of the group and add, say, 2 to keep it well away from local groups. As the RID of Domain Users is 513 then our gidNumber becomes 20513. For users, we allocated our first user uidNumber 332 to avoid collision with the xidnumbers which have to remain in idmap. I don't think that 332 is a good uidNumber because idmap seems to use the 300-400 range. No. It doesn't matter. AD knows nothing about idmap.ldb but if you're happier, then use an even higher range;) # getent passwd Guest CHEZMOI\Guest:*:311:312::/home/CHEZMOI/Guest:/bin/false uid=311 although I have done no change in the Guest account.oming from /ur/ Those uid:gid pairs are coming from idmap. idmap is not part of AD and confuses the issue for many of us. If you are going to add more DC's, these uid:gid's will change depending upon which DC you refer to. Probably (almost certainly) not what you want. Absolutely. :) How choose Samba these uid/gid numbers (e.g 311/312) and how can I choose my uid/gid numbers in order that there is never conflict with uid/gid choose automatically by Samba? That is best answered by looking at: ldbsearch --url=/usr/local/samba/private/idmap.ldb Ok, it's a good answer indeed. And I can see: # ldbsearch --url=/usr/local/samba/private/idmap.ldb cn=config # record 1 dn: CN=CONFIG cn: CONFIG lowerBound: 300 upperBound: 400 xidNumber: 317 distinguishedName: CN=CONFIG Then, I understand that idmap uses the 300-400 range to assign xidNumber to the users and groups. There, you'll see the sids with the xidnumber that Samba has allocated to them. This xidnumber becomes the uid or gid depending upon whether the object is a user, group or both. A basic set of objects has to remain in idmap so leave it as it is after provision. If you add the line idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = Yes to smb.conf (which I believe the provision has already done for you) then any new user or group object that is created will not have an entry in idmap. You are then free to add the necessary uid/gidNumbers to AD. Yes, indeed: # grep 'rfc' /usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes # samba # samba-tool user add test4 test4 User 'test4' created successfully # ldbsearch --url=/usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb cn=test4 | grep -i objectsid objectSid: S-1-5-21-3840058276-1254623269-3939424142-1106 # ldbsearch --url=/usr/local/samba/private/idmap.ldb cn=S-1-5-21-3840058276-1254623269-3939424142-1106 # returned 0 records # 0 entries # 0 referrals But after this: # getent passwd test4 CHEZMOI\test4:*:319:100::/home/CHEZMOI/test4:/bin/false
Re: [Samba] tests failing on Debian Squeeze
On 04/14/2013 03:22 AM, Geoff Crompton wrote: On 14/04/13 06:48, Matthieu Patou wrote: On 04/12/2013 05:11 PM, Geoff Crompton wrote: FAILED (318 failures, 7 errors and 0 unexpected successes in 431 testsuites) A summary with detailed information can be found in: ./st/summary ERROR: test failed with exit code 1 make: *** [test] Error 1 How important is it for all the tests to pass? Should I just press on with a 'sudo make install'? No it's ok but in the same time if you could file a bug for each failing test so that we can start to have a look at fixing them. Hi Matthieu, Thanks for your response. The summary suggests there are over 300 failed tests. Do you really want over 300 bug submissions? If so, I'll have to work out how to automate that (maybe with https://github.com/LegNeato/bztools). What kind of extra information is useful along with these bug reports? I'm assuming on each one you'd want the relevant section of the ./st/summary file, and mention the environment it was run in (distribution, installed packages and their versions). Is there a script in the samba tree to extract from the system this summary? One should be sufficient for the moment, I misread and had the impression that you had only 7 errors. On my debian it's what I had not long time ago (not retired since then). Matthieu. -- Matthieu Patou Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] file share necessary?
Am 15.04.2013 04:23, schrieb Geoff Crompton: On https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO#Setup_a_basic_File_Share the instructions says For the server to be useful you, will need to update it to have at least one share What do you need a file share for the server to be useful? Isn't a domain controller 'useful' to authenticate machines and users even if it doesn't have a file share? I would have thought that this step would be optional, like the NTP step just above it. The DC need at least a sysvol and netlogon share. Regards, Marc -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] file share necessary?
2013-04-15 04:23 keltezéssel, Geoff Crompton írta: On https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO#Setup_a_basic_File_Share the instructions says For the server to be useful you, will need to update it to have at least one share What do you need a file share for the server to be useful? Isn't a domain controller 'useful' to authenticate machines and users even if it doesn't have a file share? I would have thought that this step would be optional, like the NTP step just above it. Cheers, Geoff I agree, the step is completely optional, but the the NTP config is highly recommended. Regards Geza Gemes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] file share necessary?
On 15/04/13 14:07, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: Am 15.04.2013 04:23, schrieb Geoff Crompton: On https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO#Setup_a_basic_File_Share the instructions says For the server to be useful you, will need to update it to have at least one share What do you need a file share for the server to be useful? Isn't a domain controller 'useful' to authenticate machines and users even if it doesn't have a file share? I would have thought that this step would be optional, like the NTP step just above it. The DC need at least a sysvol and netlogon share. Regards, Marc That makes sense. If you've followed the HOWTO (as I just have) you probably already have sysvol and netlogon shares. Does anyone mind if I mark the 'Setup a basic File Share' as optional, and add some notes that the sysvol and netlogon shares are needed for a domain controller, but users should feel free to add their own if they desire? Cheers, Geoff -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated
The branch, master has been updated
via 3434140 samba-tool - MX records cannot be deleted (error in called
C-program)
from 41333f9 ntdb: remove --disable-ntdb.
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit 3434140c0959d9608f9a4636df2060d00ac9b518
Author: Guenter Kukkukk ku...@samba.org
Date: Sun Apr 14 06:17:28 2013 +0200
samba-tool - MX records cannot be deleted (error in called C-program)
Only matching UNION-members should be compared. MX vs. SRV record
Signed-off-by: Guenter Kukkukk ku...@samba.org
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Apr 14 08:46:07 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
---
Summary of changes:
source4/rpc_server/dnsserver/dnsdata.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Changeset truncated at 500 lines:
diff --git a/source4/rpc_server/dnsserver/dnsdata.c
b/source4/rpc_server/dnsserver/dnsdata.c
index 3dc7dcc..09dba53 100644
--- a/source4/rpc_server/dnsserver/dnsdata.c
+++ b/source4/rpc_server/dnsserver/dnsdata.c
@@ -971,7 +971,7 @@ bool dns_record_match(struct dnsp_DnssrvRpcRecord *rec1,
struct dnsp_DnssrvRpcRe
case DNS_TYPE_MX:
return rec1-data.mx.wPriority == rec2-data.srv.wPriority
- dns_name_equal(rec1-data.mx.nameTarget,
rec2-data.srv.nameTarget);
+ dns_name_equal(rec1-data.mx.nameTarget,
rec2-data.mx.nameTarget);
case DNS_TYPE_TXT:
if (rec1-data.txt.count != rec2-data.txt.count) {
--
Samba Shared Repository
[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated
The branch, master has been updated via f67ae78 samba-tool - MX records cannot be deleted (part2) from 3434140 samba-tool - MX records cannot be deleted (error in called C-program) http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log - commit f67ae788cf8a678af0e309c8527f2b25c98b557b Author: Guenter Kukkukk ku...@samba.org Date: Sun Apr 14 19:39:02 2013 +0200 samba-tool - MX records cannot be deleted (part2) I missed this one, also a wrong compare of MX vs. SRV record Signed-off-by: Guenter Kukkukk ku...@samba.org Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Apr 14 22:43:07 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104 --- Summary of changes: source4/rpc_server/dnsserver/dnsdata.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Changeset truncated at 500 lines: diff --git a/source4/rpc_server/dnsserver/dnsdata.c b/source4/rpc_server/dnsserver/dnsdata.c index 09dba53..f0584a9 100644 --- a/source4/rpc_server/dnsserver/dnsdata.c +++ b/source4/rpc_server/dnsserver/dnsdata.c @@ -970,7 +970,7 @@ bool dns_record_match(struct dnsp_DnssrvRpcRecord *rec1, struct dnsp_DnssrvRpcRe return dns_name_equal(rec1-data.ptr, rec2-data.ptr); case DNS_TYPE_MX: - return rec1-data.mx.wPriority == rec2-data.srv.wPriority + return rec1-data.mx.wPriority == rec2-data.mx.wPriority dns_name_equal(rec1-data.mx.nameTarget, rec2-data.mx.nameTarget); case DNS_TYPE_TXT: -- Samba Shared Repository
[SCM] CTDB repository - branch master updated - ctdb-2.1-49-g043e18a
The branch, master has been updated via 043e18a8324ccb2c8ddd7b323ebedb5b0de1298d (commit) from 35264e42ade4676468cf7713fa339c784e932953 (commit) http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=ctdb.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log - commit 043e18a8324ccb2c8ddd7b323ebedb5b0de1298d Author: Amitay Isaacs ami...@gmail.com Date: Thu Apr 11 16:58:59 2013 +1000 tests: Fix typo in variable name Signed-off-by: Amitay Isaacs ami...@gmail.com --- Summary of changes: tests/simple/76_ctdb_pdb_recovery.sh |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Changeset truncated at 500 lines: diff --git a/tests/simple/76_ctdb_pdb_recovery.sh b/tests/simple/76_ctdb_pdb_recovery.sh index 2f21fdd..50f241e 100755 --- a/tests/simple/76_ctdb_pdb_recovery.sh +++ b/tests/simple/76_ctdb_pdb_recovery.sh @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ wait_until_node_has_status 1 notstopped # TESTDB=persistent_test.tdb -stauts=0 +status=0 # Create a temporary persistent database to test with echo create persistent test database $TESTDB -- CTDB repository
