Re: [Samba] Permissions problem

[Bruno MACADRE]

Le 24/12/2012 17:33, Michael B. Trausch a écrit :

On 12/20/2012 10:05 AM, Bruno MACADRE wrote:

If I copy this file in command line the mode is 660 as expected, If I
want to simulate the file explorer behaviour I must do a 'cp
--preserve=mode' copy.

 Is there a way to forbid this behaviour ? Or is there something
wrong in my configuration ?


The only way that I could think of would be to write a Samba VFS module
that prevented invocation of the chown(2) and chmod(2) system calls (and
friends).  Such a VFS module would need to return a suitable error code,
which would more than likely then be passed back to the client.

Or you could simply stub the chown/chmod (and friends!) system calls
such that they return success but are effectively no-ops.

Someone else with more intimate experience with Samba's code may have a
better option, but that's the only one I can think of at the moment.

HTH,
Mike

That was a really good idea, I've just write fake_chmod VFS module 
that intercept chmod (and friends) invocations and return 0 without do 
anything.


This module works perfectly. I tested it with nautilus and the final 
rights on the file are like expected. I haven't tested on win7 yet but I 
think that it should be the same behaviour.


Thanks for your idea,
Bruno


--

Bruno MACADRE
---
 Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseau | Systems and Network Engineer
 Département Informatique | Department of computer science
 Responsable Réseau et Téléphonie | Telecom and Network Manager
 Université de Rouen  | University of Rouen
---
Coordonnées / Contact :
Université de Rouen
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques - Madrillet
Avenue de l'Université - BP12
76801 St Etienne du Rouvray CEDEX
FRANCE

Tél : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-86
Fax : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-87
---

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] Permissions problem

[Bruno MACADRE]

Hi,

	I've got a strange behaviour on a share when I copy files with files 
explorers (like Thunar, Nautilus, ...).


This is the share configuration :
[share1]
comment = Share 01
path = /home/shares/share1
valid users = +share1
force group = share1
read only = No
create mask = 0660
force create mode = 0660
directory mask = 1770
force directory mode = 1770
browseable = No
strict locking = Yes

	When I copy/paste a file from my computer (which has 444 mode) to the 
share the resultant file has 444 mode (instead of the 660 expected).


	I think the mode was changed by the file explorer 'cause when the file 
was created on the share (and during the copy process) the mode is 660 
(like expected) it's just at the end of the copy that the mode was 
change to reflect mode of the source file.


	If I copy this file in command line the mode is 660 as expected, If I 
want to simulate the file explorer behaviour I must do a 'cp 
--preserve=mode' copy.


	Is there a way to forbid this behaviour ? Or is there something wrong 
in my configuration ?


Thanx by advance,
Regards
Bruno


--

Bruno MACADRE
---
 Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseau | Systems and Network Engineer
 Département Informatique | Department of computer science
 Responsable Réseau et Téléphonie | Telecom and Network Manager
 Université de Rouen  | University of Rouen
---
Coordonnées / Contact :
Université de Rouen
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques - Madrillet
Avenue de l'Université - BP12
76801 St Etienne du Rouvray CEDEX
FRANCE

Tél : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-86
Fax : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-87
---

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] samba with ldap+TLS

[Bruno MACADRE]

Hi,

No, you don't need CA certificate on win clients 'cause they don't 
connect directly to the LDAP. Only your Samba server need CA certificate 
to connect to the LDAP using TLS.


Regards,
Bruno

Le 07/11/2011 18:18, steve a écrit :

Hi

I know Linux clients need a CA certificate to authenticate via LDAP using TLS.
What about win 7 and XP clients using a Samba server?

Thanks
Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] Problem adding Worstation

[Bruno MACADRE]

Hi !

I've got a server with Samba 3.5.3 with LDAP backend running on it.

When I want to add a workstation I've got a strange result

First there is the workstation LDAP account :

dn: cn=TOTO$,ou=machines,o=ADM-SC,dc=univ-rouen,dc=fr
objectClass: top
objectClass: person
objectClass: posixAccount
objectClass: sambaSamAccount
cn: TOTO$
sn: TOTO$
uid: TOTO$
uidNumber: 5037
gidNumber: 5000
loginShell: /bin/false
homeDirectory: /dev/null
gecos: Machine TOTO
sambaSID: S-1-5-21-1597492338-1443626506-322857960-11074

When I do the 'smbpasswd -am TOTO' I've got no error but my 
workstation account becomes a user account !!!

When I do 'pdbedit -v TOTO$' I've got this result :

smbldap_search_domain_info: Searching 
for:[((objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=ADM-SC))]

smbldap_open_connection: connection opened
init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: TOTO$
init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 5000
init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 5000
init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 5000
Unix username:TOTO$
NT username:  TOTO$
Account Flags:[U  ]
User SID: S-1-5-21-1597492338-1443626506-322857960-11074
Primary Group SID:S-1-5-21-1597492338-1443626506-322857960-515
Full Name:TOTO$
Home Directory:   \\cpd-adm-sc\toto_
HomeDir Drive:Z:
Logon Script: toto_.bat
Profile Path: \\cpd-adm-sc\profile\toto_
Domain:   ADM-SC
Account desc:
Workstations:
Munged dial:
Logon time:   0
Logoff time:  never
Kickoff time: never
Password last set:Thu, 05 May 2011 16:12:37 CEST
Password can change:  Thu, 05 May 2011 16:12:37 CEST
Password must change: never
Last bad password   : 0
Bad password count  : 0
Logon hours : FF

--

Bruno MACADRE
---
 Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseau | Systems and Network Engineer
 Département Informatique | Department of computer science
 Responsable Réseau et Téléphonie | Telecom and Network Manager
 Université de Rouen  | University of Rouen
---
Coordonnées / Contact :
Université de Rouen
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques - Madrillet
Avenue de l'Université - BP12
76801 St Etienne du Rouvray CEDEX
FRANCE

Tél : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-86
Fax : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-87
---


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Group permission

[Bruno MACADRE]

Hi,

	In your smb.conf you must use the 'force group' option for the share 
that you want like this :


[share]
...
force group = MyGroup

	With this option, all files created/modified by any valid user for this 
group will be in the 'MyGroup' group.


Regards,
Bruno.


Le 09/12/2010 13:50, Rodolfo Barbosa a écrit :

Hi Guys,

I have a Debian Lenny that acts as the PDC server of my
network. This server has some shares that are accessed for
different groups of users.

So, when an user creates or changes a folder/file inside
that shares, the folder/file has its group changed to the
primary group of the user that have made the changes on it.
How can I determine to which group this folder/file will
belong at the creation/modification time?

Thank's
--
Rodolfo Barbosa
Lunar Consultoria
barbosa.rodo...@lunarconsultoria.com.br
CEL: +55 (35) 9132-0764





--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] Share Problem

[Bruno MACADRE]

Hi,

	Like explained in my precedent mail (Permission Problems), I want to do 
a share (called partinfo) with basic behaviour :

* everybody in group 'info' can create file into the share.
	* everybody in group 'info' can modify file into the share (not only 
owned files)

* only owner of a file can delete it/rename it !

I put a Sticky Bit on my share folder so I've got :

drwxrwx--T  rootinfo.   partinfo

	It works fine localy, but when I want to use the share, it doesn't work 
at all, 'cause when I modify a file, some applications (like Gedit, 
Word, ...) try to change the owner of the file... So I can't write...


Anybody have any ideas or any tips ?

Thanks
Bruno
--

Bruno MACADRE
---
 Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseau | Systems and Network Engineer
 Département Informatique | Department of computer science
 Responsable Réseau et Téléphonie | Telecom and Network Manager
 Université de Rouen  | University of Rouen
---
Coordonnées / Contact :
Université de Rouen
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques - Madrillet
Avenue de l'Université - BP12
76801 St Etienne du Rouvray CEDEX
FRANCE

Tél : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-86
Fax : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-87
---

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Share Problem

[Bruno MACADRE]

Le 06/12/2010 15:47, Chris Smith a écrit :

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Bruno MACADRE
bruno.maca...@univ-rouen.fr  wrote:

Like explained in my precedent mail (Permission Problems), I want to
do a share (called partinfo) with basic behaviour :
* everybody in group 'info' can create file into the share.
* everybody in group 'info' can modify file into the share (not only
owned files)
* only owner of a file can delete it/rename it !

I put a Sticky Bit on my share folder so I've got :

drwxrwx--T  rootinfo.   partinfo

It works fine localy, but when I want to use the share, it doesn't
work at all, 'cause when I modify a file, some applications (like Gedit,
Word, ...) try to change the owner of the file... So I can't write...

Anybody have any ideas or any tips ?


Try:

chmod 1777 /path/to/partinfo

[partinfo]
...
...
valid users = +info
read only = no
force group = info
force create mode = 764
force directory mode = 775
...
...


It looks like to works like I want !

Thanks a lot Chris !

--

Bruno MACADRE
---
 Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseau | Systems and Network Engineer
 Département Informatique | Department of computer science
 Responsable Réseau et Téléphonie | Telecom and Network Manager
 Université de Rouen  | University of Rouen
---
Coordonnées / Contact :
Université de Rouen
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques - Madrillet
Avenue de l'Université - BP12
76801 St Etienne du Rouvray CEDEX
FRANCE

Tél : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-86
Fax : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-87
---

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Permissions problem

[Bruno MACADRE]

Well,

	I've searched on samba.org why these two versions don't have the same 
behaviour and I found that's a bug in 3.3.0.


So now the problem is a little bit different :
I'm on a SAMBA 3.5.6 Server with this share :
[partinfo]
path=/shares/partinfo
valid users = +info
force user = %U
force group = info
write list = +info
public = No
create mask = 0660
directory mask = 0770

and localy :
drwxrwx--T 21 root info 4096 2009-01-17 08:38 partinfo

Localy the behaviour is Ok :
User FOO put a file in /shares/partinfo :
-rw-rw 1 foo info 9 2010-12-03 11:00 foo_file

If user BAR wants to delete it : Permission Denied
If user BAR wants to modify it : Ok

Remotely the behaviour is Bad :
If user BAR mount this share and try to delete the file foo_file : 
Permission Denied (Nice !)

If user BAR try to modify it : Permission Denied (Not Nice...) !

I've tried lot of modifications into my smb.conf but nothing works.

I want my share works identicaly localy and remotely !! I want that all 
users in info group can modify all files (except these without 'w' 
rights) but can only delete files that they own...


I'm sure it's possible with SAMBA, but how ?


Le 01/12/2010 15:53, Bruno MACADRE a écrit :

Permissions for the share are the same in 3.3.0 and 3.5.6, like this :

drwxrwx--- 21 root info 4096 2009-01-17 08:38 partinfo

thx,

Le 01/12/2010 12:14, George Mamalakis a écrit :

On 01/12/2010 11:38, Bruno MACADRE wrote:

Hello all,

I've got an old server running SAMBA 3.3.0. I've some shares on it.
All shares looks like this :

[partinfo]
path=/shares/partinfo
valid users = +info
force user = %U
force group = info
read only = No
create mask = 0660
directory mask = 0770

All works perfectly : When I create a file on this share other users
in the info group can modify it but nobody can delete it (exactly that
i want).

But, it's time to change our server and to put a newer version of
SAMBA (3.5.6). On the new server, the behaviour is totaly different
(with the same smb.conf file) : When I create a new file, other users
n the group info can modify it AND delete it (exactly that i don't
want) !!!

Worst ! When I put in this share (localy in root) a file like this :
# echo Test /shares/partinfo/testfile
# chown root.root /shares/partinfo/testfile
# chmod 600 /shares/partinfo/testfile

When I return to my share (like above) with my user (not admin user) I
can delete the file 'testfile' without any problem !!!

I think this behaviour is not the 'normal' behaviour. What can I've
missed ? Does anyone have any tips ?

Regards,
Bruno.



Please, show as the /shares/partinfo permissions (which is responsible
for reading/writing content into it).

Thanx,

mamalos







--

Bruno MACADRE
---
 Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseau | Systems and Network Engineer
 Département Informatique | Department of computer science
 Responsable Réseau et Téléphonie | Telecom and Network Manager
 Université de Rouen  | University of Rouen
---
Coordonnées / Contact :
Université de Rouen
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques - Madrillet
Avenue de l'Université - BP12
76801 St Etienne du Rouvray CEDEX
FRANCE

Tél : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-86
Fax : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-87
---

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] Permissions problem

[Bruno MACADRE]

Hello all,

	I've got an old server running SAMBA 3.3.0. I've some shares on it. All 
shares looks like this :


[partinfo]
path=/shares/partinfo
valid users = +info
force user = %U
force group = info
read only = No
create mask = 0660
directory mask = 0770

All works perfectly : When I create a file on this share other users in 
the info group can modify it but nobody can delete it (exactly that i want).


But, it's time to change our server and to put a newer version of SAMBA 
(3.5.6). On the new server, the behaviour is totaly different (with the 
same smb.conf file) : When I create a new file, other users n the group 
info can modify it AND delete it (exactly that i don't want) !!!


Worst ! When I put in this share (localy in root) a file like this :
# echo Test /shares/partinfo/testfile
# chown root.root /shares/partinfo/testfile
# chmod 600 /shares/partinfo/testfile

When I return to my share (like above) with my user (not admin user) I 
can delete the file 'testfile' without any problem !!!


I think this behaviour is not the 'normal' behaviour. What can I've 
missed ? Does anyone have any tips ?


Regards,
Bruno.


--

Bruno MACADRE
---
 Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseau | Systems and Network Engineer
 Département Informatique | Department of computer science
 Responsable Réseau et Téléphonie | Telecom and Network Manager
 Université de Rouen  | University of Rouen
---
Coordonnées / Contact :
Université de Rouen
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques - Madrillet
Avenue de l'Université - BP12
76801 St Etienne du Rouvray CEDEX
FRANCE

Tél : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-86
Fax : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-87
---

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Permissions problem

[Bruno MACADRE]

Permissions for the share are the same in 3.3.0 and 3.5.6, like this :

drwxrwx--- 21 root info4096 2009-01-17 08:38 partinfo

thx,

Le 01/12/2010 12:14, George Mamalakis a écrit :

On 01/12/2010 11:38, Bruno MACADRE wrote:

Hello all,

I've got an old server running SAMBA 3.3.0. I've some shares on it.
All shares looks like this :

[partinfo]
path=/shares/partinfo
valid users = +info
force user = %U
force group = info
read only = No
create mask = 0660
directory mask = 0770

All works perfectly : When I create a file on this share other users
in the info group can modify it but nobody can delete it (exactly that
i want).

But, it's time to change our server and to put a newer version of
SAMBA (3.5.6). On the new server, the behaviour is totaly different
(with the same smb.conf file) : When I create a new file, other users
n the group info can modify it AND delete it (exactly that i don't
want) !!!

Worst ! When I put in this share (localy in root) a file like this :
# echo Test /shares/partinfo/testfile
# chown root.root /shares/partinfo/testfile
# chmod 600 /shares/partinfo/testfile

When I return to my share (like above) with my user (not admin user) I
can delete the file 'testfile' without any problem !!!

I think this behaviour is not the 'normal' behaviour. What can I've
missed ? Does anyone have any tips ?

Regards,
Bruno.



Please, show as the /shares/partinfo permissions (which is responsible
for reading/writing content into it).

Thanx,

mamalos




--

Bruno MACADRE
---
 Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseau | Systems and Network Engineer
 Département Informatique | Department of computer science
 Responsable Réseau et Téléphonie | Telecom and Network Manager
 Université de Rouen  | University of Rouen
---
Coordonnées / Contact :
Université de Rouen
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques - Madrillet
Avenue de l'Université - BP12
76801 St Etienne du Rouvray CEDEX
FRANCE

Tél : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-86
Fax : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-87
---

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] using ldap only idmap

[Bruno MACADRE]

I don't see any of the add ... script in your smb.conf (especially the 
add machine script in your case). I don't know if it's the problem but i 
think it would be usefull to tell smbd how to add machine if its name 
don't exist in the LDAP...


Mariano Absatz a écrit :

Can anyone help me on this? I'm really stuck...

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 16:58, Mariano Absatz el.b...@gmail.com wrote:
  

Hi,

I'm trying to make a pure ldap setup, whereas users, groups, id mappings
and everything that is supported with LDAP be in the LDAP tree and managed
directly by samba.

That is, I'm using:

ldapsam:trusted = yes
ldapsam:editposix = yes

And NOT using smbldap-*.

My smb.conf is here: http://wiki.clueless.com.ar/SambaLdap/smb.conf-PDC

I created the LDAP tree root (o=midominio) and all its branches (ou=people;
ou=groups; ou= hosts and ou=idmap).

I ran net sam provision to fill in the basic values.

I stored the secrets in secrets.tdb:
# smbpasswd -w ldap_admin_password
# net idmap secret midominio ldap_admin_password
# net idmap secret alloc ldap_admin_password

I was able to join a samba server to the domain (net rpc join -S miserver
-UAdministrator).

However, when I try to join an XP host to the domain, I get an error (IIRC
it's An attached device is not functionning) in the workstation and the
samba logs show the following:

[2009/10/15 11:17:47,  0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_create_user(5119)
 ldapsam_create_user: Unable to allocate a new user id: bailing out!

The user I'm using to bind to the LDAP server is the LDAP administrator and
it does have permissions on all the tree (in particular, within
ou=idmap,o=midominio)...

I manually added an entry for the workstation's account posix data, then
issued smbpasswd -a workstation$

THEN I could join the domain...

Clearly, I have something misconfigured regarding ldap/idmap/alloc, but I
can't find enough information to do it right.

Any help REALLY appreciated...





  


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Desiring to set up Windows Vista and Linux Fedora Core 4

[Bruno MACADRE]

Barry L. Bond a écrit :

Hi Michael!

 Thank you for your fast reply!

On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 04:35:50PM +0200, Michael Wood wrote:

  

From what you say above, I assume that the Windows machine is on
either 192.168.1.x or 192.168.2.x networks?  Don't forget to use a
full stop after them like:

hosts allow 192.168.1. 192.168.2.

or you could write it like:

hosts allow 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.0/24



 H... I have hosts allow = 192.168.1., 192.168.2., 127.

 I have a space between the IP address excerpts (I presume that's what
you mean by the full stop), though I also have a comma.  I'll remove the
commas...

  

What does your smb.conf look like?  And what happens when you try to
connect/print from the Windows machine?  What errors to you get?



 Here is my current smb.conf file:


# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1)
# Date: 2009/10/03 00:37:16

# Global parameters
[global]
server string = Windows in Linux - VMware
interfaces = eth0, vmnet1, vmnet8
guest account = barry
username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 50
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
printcap name = /etc/printcap
preferred master = Yes
dns proxy = No
idmap uid = 16777216-33554431
idmap gid = 16777216-33554431
guest ok = Yes
hosts allow = 192.168.1. 192.168.2. 127.
cups options = raw

[homes]
comment = Home Directories
read only = No

[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
printable = Yes
browseable = No

[HostFS]
comment = VMware host filesystem
path = /
read only = No

[barry]
path = /home/barry
valid users = barry
read only = No

[HP9110]
comment = Hewlett-Packard OfficeJet 9110
path = /var/spool/samba
read only = No
printable = Yes
printer name = HP9110
oplocks = No
share modes = No


 There are a LOT of comments in my original smb.conf file, but since I
tried to modify a couple of things using SWAT, I see it removed the
comments.

 Much of what is in this file is what I had, years ago, when I had
Windows 98 which I could access through VMware, which was running on my
Linux system.  (I want to do exactly what I did with that, be able to
submit a print job or transfer a file either direction.)

 After I removed the comments in my hosts allow line, I typed
service smb restart in my root window:


[r...@barrycon samba]# service smb restart
Shutting down SMB services:[  OK  ]
Shutting down NMB services:[  OK  ]
Starting SMB services: [  OK  ]
Starting NMB services: [  OK  ]


 On the Windows computer, I clicked Start and then Network.

 I double-clicked OFFICE-WINDOWS.

 I double-clicked Add a Printer.

 Then an Add a printer came up near the top of my explorer, after
Organize and Views.

 Clicking Add a printer, I choose Add a network, wireless or
Bluetooth printer in the dialog box that comes up. (Add a local printer
is the only other choice here.)

 It says Searching for available printers...

 After a delay, it says No printers were found.

 I click The printer that I want isn't listed and out of the three
choices (Browse for a printer, Select a shared printer by name and
Add a printer using a TCP/IP address or hostname), I choose the second
one, as the printer is connected to my Linux system with a parallel port,
and it does not have an IP address.

 I click in the text box and type \\barrycon\hp9110

 The hostname is barrycon (and that is exactly what worked in the
Windows 98/VMware I did years ago), and if I type lpstat -v the first
line says device for HP9110:.

 Another dialog box says Connecting to hp9110 on barrycon and after
a short delay it says Windows cannot connect to the printer.  The server
print spooler service is not running.  Please restart the spooler on the
server or restart the server machine.

 Michael, in the extremely limited time I've given this, I don't
appear to be communicating at all.  I thank you that you and others are
trying to help me, so I believe I will just see if you or anyone else
replies before I mess something up worse!  :-)

 Thank you again!

 Barry

  

Hi,

   Is your samba server a wins server (i don't see it in your smb.conf) 
? Or have you a wins server on your network ?
   Have you try to put barrycon's IP address instead of its name ? 
(something like \\Barrycon_IP\HP9110) ?


Bruno
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] problem with smbd

[Bruno MACADRE]

Bruno Steven a écrit :
 Ok , I fix but when started the smbd show other problem 
 
 [2009/10/07 15:19:47, 1] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:pdb_init_ldapsam(5720)
   pdb_init_ldapsam: Resetting SID for domain AMBLIVRE.COM
 http://AMBLIVRE.COM based on pdb_ldap results
 S-1-5-21-755328524-3875606875-861347881 -
 S-1-5-21-1644746683-2480834100-52597
 [2009/10/07 15:19:47, 1] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:pdb_init_ldapsam(5727)
   New global sam SID: S-1-5-21-1644746683-2480834100-52597
 [2009/10/07 15:19:47, 0] services/services_db.c:svcctl_init_keys(420)
   svcctl_init_keys: key lookup failed! (WERR_ACCESS_DENIED)
 [2009/10/07 15:19:47, 0] smbd/server.c:main(1057)
   ERROR: failed to setup guest info.
 
 This problem have relation with SSL other thing ? 
  
 On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Bruno MACADRE
 bruno.maca...@univ-rouen.fr mailto:bruno.maca...@univ-rouen.fr wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
   This message indicate that you have forget to tell your LDAP
 admin password to SAMBA
 
   You just need to give the password for the ldap admin user you
 specify in your smb.conf (ldap admin dn), using this command :
 
   # smbpasswd -w ldap_admin_password
   or if you prefer
   # smbpasswd -W (you'll be prompted for the ldap admin password
 twice) !
 
   Regards,
   Bruno
 
  Bruno Steven a écrit :
 
 Hello
 
 I try intregate LDAP more SAMBA , when I start the process smbd
 -D show the
 message follow
 
 
 [2009/10/07 14:58:12, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_connect_system(942)
  ldap_connect_system: Failed to retrieve password from secrets.tdb
 [2009/10/07 14:58:12, 0] smbd/server.c:main(1057)
  ERROR: failed to setup guest info.
 
 Somebody can explain the message , I don´t understand this message.
 
 Thanks ..
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Bruno Steven - Administrador de sistemas.
 LPIC-1 - LPI ID: lpi000119659 / Code: p2e4wz47e4
 https://www.lpi.org/caf/Xamman/certification
 
 MCP-Windows 2003 - TranscriptID: 793804 / Access Code: 080089100
 https://mcp.microsoft.com/authenticate/validatemcp.aspx

Are you sure that the ldap admin dn you've supplied have full access
over your LDAP ?


-- 

Bruno MACADRE
---
 Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseau | Systems and Network Engineer
 Département Informatique | Department of computer science
 Responsable Réseau et Téléphonie | Telecom and Network Manager
 Université de Rouen  | University of Rouen
---
Coordonnées / Contact :
Université de Rouen
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques - Madrillet
Avenue de l'Université - BP12
76801 St Etienne du Rouvray CEDEX
FRANCE

Tél : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-86
Fax : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-87
---

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] problem with smbd

[Bruno MACADRE]

Hi,

   This message indicate that you have forget to tell your LDAP admin 
password to SAMBA


   You just need to give the password for the ldap admin user you 
specify in your smb.conf (ldap admin dn), using this command :


   # smbpasswd -w ldap_admin_password
   or if you prefer
   # smbpasswd -W (you'll be prompted for the ldap admin password twice) !

   Regards,
   Bruno

  
Bruno Steven a écrit :

Hello

I try intregate LDAP more SAMBA , when I start the process smbd -D show the
message follow


[2009/10/07 14:58:12, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_connect_system(942)
  ldap_connect_system: Failed to retrieve password from secrets.tdb
[2009/10/07 14:58:12, 0] smbd/server.c:main(1057)
  ERROR: failed to setup guest info.

Somebody can explain the message , I don´t understand this message.

Thanks ..

  


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] MSH_SHUTDOWN

[Bruno MACADRE]

  id   : 0x0cb6 (3254)
  src: struct server_id
  id   : 0x0cb6 (3254)
  buf  : DATA_BLOB length=0
[2009/10/04 23:10:45, 10] smbd/process.c:667(smbd_idle_event_handler)
  smbd_idle_event_handler: idle_evt(deadtime) (nil) stopped
[2009/10/04 23:10:45, 10]
lib/messages_local.c:73(messaging_tdb_signal_handler)
  messaging_tdb_signal_handler: sig[10] count[1] msgs[1]
[2009/10/04 23:10:45, 10] lib/messages_local.c:447(message_dispatch)
  message_dispatch: received_messages = 1
[2009/10/04 23:10:45, 10] lib/messages_local.c:196(messaging_tdb_fetch)
  messaging_tdb_fetch:
[2009/10/04 23:10:45,  1] ../librpc/ndr/ndr.c:214(ndr_print_debug)
   result: struct messaging_array
  num_messages : 0x0001 (1)
  messages: ARRAY(1)
  messages: struct messaging_rec
  msg_version  : 0x0002 (2)
  msg_type : MSG_SHUTDOWN (13)
  dest: struct server_id
  id   : 0x0cb6 (3254)
  src: struct server_id
  id   : 0x0cb6 (3254)
  buf  : DATA_BLOB length=0
[2009/10/04 23:10:45,  3] smbd/server.c:146(msg_exit_server)
  got a SHUTDOWN message
[2009/10/04 23:10:45,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2009/10/04 23:10:45,  5] auth/token_util.c:522(debug_nt_user_token)
  NT user token: (NULL)
[2009/10/04 23:10:45,  5] auth/token_util.c:548(debug_unix_user_token)
  UNIX token of user 0
  Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups
[2009/10/04 23:10:45,  5] smbd/uid.c:368(change_to_root_user)
  change_to_root_user: now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0)
[2009/10/04 23:10:45,  3] smbd/connection.c:31(yield_connection)
  Yielding connection to
[2009/10/04 23:10:45, 10] lib/dbwrap_tdb.c:100(db_tdb_fetch_locked)
  Locking key B60C
[2009/10/04 23:10:45, 10] lib/dbwrap_tdb.c:129(db_tdb_fetch_locked)
  Allocated locked data 0x0xb9b00ad8
[2009/10/04 23:10:45,  3] smbd/connection.c:42(yield_connection)
  deleting connection record returned NT_STATUS_NOT_FOUND
[2009/10/04 23:10:45, 10] lib/dbwrap_tdb.c:42(db_tdb_record_destr)
  Unlocking key B60C
[2009/10/04 23:10:45,  3] smbd/server.c:845(exit_server_common)
[2009/10/04 23:10:45,  6] param/loadparm.c:6994(lp_file_list_changed)
  lp_file_list_changed()
  file /etc/samba/smb.conf - /etc/samba/smb.conf  last mod_time: Fri
Oct  2 23:47:47 2009

[2009/10/04 23:10:45,  5] smbd/reply.c:498(reply_special)
  init msg_type=0x81 msg_flags=0x0


I've got 722 got a SHUTDOWN between 04-Oct-2009 at 21:43:28 and Today
(05-Oct-2009) at 9:50:25... This server hasn't been used during this period.

I don't know if there is a relation between this behavior and my
problems (see smbd crash messages), but this servers have restarted this
night (04-Oct at 23:00) at 00:00 his load average was 0.00 and Mem used
: 190 Mb. This morning (9:50) his load average is 0.00 but Mem Used have
growed to 2.37 Gb (without any activities).

To be continued...

Regards,
Bruno




-- 

Bruno MACADRE
---
 Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseau | Systems and Network Engineer
 Département Informatique | Department of computer science
 Responsable Réseau et Téléphonie | Telecom and Network Manager
 Université de Rouen  | University of Rouen
---
Coordonnées / Contact :
Université de Rouen
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques - Madrillet
Avenue de l'Université - BP12
76801 St Etienne du Rouvray CEDEX

Tél : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-86
Fax : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-87
---

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] MSG_SHUTDOWN

[Bruno MACADRE]

Sorry for the mistyped subject, you must read MSG_SHUTDOWN instead of
MSH_SHUTDOWN !

Sorry,

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] Can't compiling over CIFS Shares

[Bruno MACADRE]

Hi,

My problems with Samba continue... I'm very disappointed, i've never
had as problems with Samba before (on my old server with Gentoo/Samba
3.0.23...).

So the new problem is : When a student want to compile a C program into
his home (mounted in CIFS), the produced executable can't be executed
./tst: cannot execute binary file. Tried on ubuntu-9.04 with
mount.cifs 3.2.3 and mount.cifs 3.4.2.

How to reproduce :
1- Mount a CIFS share on a workstation :
# mount -t cifs -ousername=toto //192.168.0.10/toto TMP
2- Go to this mount
# cd TMP
3- Write a small C program
# vi main.c
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
return 0;
}
4- Try to compile and execute them :
a- First way :
# gcc -o tst main.c
Compilation OK
# ./tst
./tst: cannot execute binary file


b- Second way :
# gcc -c main.c
Compilation OK
# gcc -o tst main.o
main.o: file not recognized: File format not recognized
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status


You can try to evaluate the type of file .o. When you compile on a local
directory of the workstation :
# file main.o
main.o: ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), not
stripped
But if you compile in a CIFS share
# file main.o
main.o: data

Any idea ??

I've a simple configuration Samba (3.4.2) as PDC and smbpasswd as
passdb backend (the bug #6771 of ldapsam obliges me to workaround with
smbpasswd). My shares are physicaly on XFS Filesystem with acl activated.

Actually my SAMBA works fine with Windows but it's totally unusable
under Linux...

To be continued...
Regards,
Bruno.

PS : If something is interrested by this problem (i hope for), i can
send my smb.conf and any log files (log level 10 activated) !

-- 

Bruno MACADRE
---
 Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseau | Systems and Network Engineer
 Département Informatique | Department of computer science
 Responsable Réseau et Téléphonie | Telecom and Network Manager
 Université de Rouen  | University of Rouen
---
Coordonnées / Contact :
Université de Rouen
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques - Madrillet
Avenue de l'Université - BP12
76801 St Etienne du Rouvray CEDEX

Tél : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-86
Fax : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-87
---

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] smbd Crash

[Bruno MACADRE]

Volker Lendecke a écrit :
 On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 04:33:39PM +0200, Bruno MACADRE wrote:
 Ok I will turn log to level 10 for the next restart of the server, when
 this crash happening i will send you all the lines requested :)

 Another clue, the crash appear only for user who connect under linux (so
 for user who mount their homes and shares in CIFS). Users using WinXP
 Pro Workstations have no problem (while server don't crash of course ^^).
 
 Oh, that is indeed a very good hint. What cifs version are
 you running, and what apps?
 
 Volker

I've no more information about the crash evoked in my previous message,
but last mail of Ralph Kutschera (Unknown panic action) points my
reflexions about Why my server seems to be hang when a panic action ??

The answer is pretty simple, i've no panic action in my smb.conf, and
in the man i can read Default: panic action =.

But if i type the following command :
# testparm -v | grep panic
I've got :
panic action = /bin/sleep 9

I don't know why in samba 3.4.2 the new default for panic action is
/bin/sleep 9 but if i do a simple calcul, this means that my
server sleep during 31 years when a crash appears 

31 years... it's long, so i'm going to activate a REAL panic action in
my smb.conf !!

This can't resolv neither my ldapsam problem (bug #6771) nor my smbd
crash when mounting some CIFS under linux (and even nor my problem of
broken compilation over CIFS share), but i think my would be more
efficient without sleeping 31 years !!

Regards,
Bruno.

-- 

Bruno MACADRE
---
 Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseau | Systems and Network Engineer
 Département Informatique | Department of computer science
 Responsable Réseau et Téléphonie | Telecom and Network Manager
 Université de Rouen  | University of Rouen
---
Coordonnées / Contact :
Université de Rouen
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques - Madrillet
Avenue de l'Université - BP12
76801 St Etienne du Rouvray CEDEX

Tél : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-86
Fax : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-87
---

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Can't compiling over CIFS Shares

[Bruno MACADRE]

Volker Lendecke a écrit :
 On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 04:30:41PM +0200, Bruno MACADRE wrote:
 Hi,

  My problems with Samba continue... I'm very disappointed, i've never
 had as problems with Samba before (on my old server with Gentoo/Samba
 3.0.23...).

  So the new problem is : When a student want to compile a C program into
 his home (mounted in CIFS), the produced executable can't be executed
 ./tst: cannot execute binary file. Tried on ubuntu-9.04 with
 mount.cifs 3.2.3 and mount.cifs 3.4.2.
 
 Isn't this more a problem with linux cifs rather than Samba
 on the server? The mount.cifs version has only minor
 relevance on the behaviour of the in-kernel module.
 
 Volker
Maybe,

Actually my kernel is 2.6.28-15-generic (basic ubuntu-desktop kernel).
I'll try another kernel and tell you what's happened

Bruno.

-- 

Bruno MACADRE
---
 Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseau | Systems and Network Engineer
 Département Informatique | Department of computer science
 Responsable Réseau et Téléphonie | Telecom and Network Manager
 Université de Rouen  | University of Rouen
---
Coordonnées / Contact :
Université de Rouen
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques - Madrillet
Avenue de l'Université - BP12
76801 St Etienne du Rouvray CEDEX

Tél : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-86
Fax : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-87
---

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] smbd Crash

[Bruno MACADRE]

Volker Lendecke a écrit :
 On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 04:42:00PM +0200, Bruno MACADRE wrote:
 I've got :
  panic action = /bin/sleep 9

 I don't know why in samba 3.4.2 the new default for panic action is
 /bin/sleep 9 but if i do a simple calcul, this means that my
 server sleep during 31 years when a crash appears 

 31 years... it's long, so i'm going to activate a REAL panic action in
 my smb.conf !!
 
 We choose this default only if you compile with
 --enable-developer=yes. It is intended for developers which
 want to attach to the crashed process with gdb.
 
 This can't resolv neither my ldapsam problem (bug #6771) nor my smbd
 crash when mounting some CIFS under linux (and even nor my problem of
 broken compilation over CIFS share), but i think my would be more
 efficient without sleeping 31 years !!
 
 For the cifs mounting crash Jeremy Allison probably has a
 fix. This just sounds too similar to bug #6776.
 
 For #6771: You might want to look at ldapsam:editposix=yes.
 
 Volker
Yes, i've compiled samba with --enable-debug and --enable-developper to
use gdb and valgrind and forgot it (ouch... i think i need to sleep a
little ^^)

Thanks for your answers i will try this ASAP !

Regards,
Bruno.


-- 

Bruno MACADRE
---
 Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseau | Systems and Network Engineer
 Département Informatique | Department of computer science
 Responsable Réseau et Téléphonie | Telecom and Network Manager
 Université de Rouen  | University of Rouen
---
Coordonnées / Contact :
Université de Rouen
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques - Madrillet
Avenue de l'Université - BP12
76801 St Etienne du Rouvray CEDEX

Tél : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-86
Fax : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-87
---

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Can't compiling over CIFS Shares

[Bruno MACADRE]

Jonathon Doran a écrit :
 Quoting Bruno MACADRE bruno.maca...@univ-rouen.fr:
 
 Volker Lendecke a écrit :
 On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 04:30:41PM +0200, Bruno MACADRE wrote:
 Hi,

 My problems with Samba continue... I'm very disappointed, i've
 never
 had as problems with Samba before (on my old server with Gentoo/Samba
 3.0.23...).

 So the new problem is : When a student want to compile a C
 program into
 his home (mounted in CIFS), the produced executable can't be executed
 ./tst: cannot execute binary file. Tried on ubuntu-9.04 with
 mount.cifs 3.2.3 and mount.cifs 3.4.2.

 Isn't this more a problem with linux cifs rather than Samba
 on the server? The mount.cifs version has only minor
 relevance on the behaviour of the in-kernel module.

 Volker
 Maybe,

 Actually my kernel is 2.6.28-15-generic (basic ubuntu-desktop kernel).
 I'll try another kernel and tell you what's happened
 
 Another kernel seems overkill, and slow.  This sounds like a problem
 with mounting options to me.  What was the command-line or the fstab
 entry for this filesystem?  Perhaps we can see something wrong there.

Like described in my previous message, my mounting options are very simple :

In my pam_mount.conf.xml the mount is like that :
volume user=* fstype=cifs server=SERVER_IP path=%(USER)
mountpoint=~
options=exec,nodev,nosuid,domain=MY-DOMAIN,charset=utf8,acl /

But even if i do a simple mount like this :
mount -t cifs -ousername=user //SERVER_IP/user REP


and when i compile into REP files produced are corrupted...


-- 

Bruno MACADRE
---
 Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseau | Systems and Network Engineer
 Département Informatique | Department of computer science
 Responsable Réseau et Téléphonie | Telecom and Network Manager
 Université de Rouen  | University of Rouen
---
Coordonnées / Contact :
Université de Rouen
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques - Madrillet
Avenue de l'Université - BP12
76801 St Etienne du Rouvray CEDEX

Tél : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-86
Fax : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-87
---

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] smbd Crash

[Bruno MACADRE]

Volker Lendecke a écrit :
 On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 04:58:22PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
 For #6771: You might want to look at ldapsam:editposix=yes.
 
 I meant ldapsam:trusted=yes
 
 Volker
Even with ldapsam:trusted=yes, all the ldap user branch is scanned at
the logon of any user...

must I use idmap even if i don't use Winbind ? ('cause my LDAP doesn't
have idmap branch for instance)

-- 

Bruno MACADRE
---
 Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseau | Systems and Network Engineer
 Département Informatique | Department of computer science
 Responsable Réseau et Téléphonie | Telecom and Network Manager
 Université de Rouen  | University of Rouen
---
Coordonnées / Contact :
Université de Rouen
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques - Madrillet
Avenue de l'Université - BP12
76801 St Etienne du Rouvray CEDEX

Tél : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-86
Fax : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-87
---

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] smbd Crash

[Bruno MACADRE]

Jeremy Allison a écrit :

On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 10:43:07AM +0200, Bruno MACADRE wrote:
  

Hi,

I don't stop to have problems with samba :s ...

Now after having workaround the bug of scanning all LDAP users for each
connexion... smbd crash very often.

In some workstation log files i can see something like this :

...
[2009/10/01 16:28:12,  2] smbd/open.c:580(open_file)
  baala opened file .profiles/firefox/cookies.sqlite-journal read=No
write=No (numopen=20)
[2009/10/01 16:28:12,  2] smbd/close.c:612(close_normal_file)
  baala closed file .profiles/firefox/cookies.sqlite-journal
(numopen=19) NT_STATUS_OK
*** glibc detected *** /usr/sbin/smbd: realloc(): invalid next size:
0x0955c5c8 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0xb7cca604]
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0xb7cce1b1]
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(realloc+0x106)[0xb7cceee6]
/usr/sbin/smbd(Realloc+0x7d)[0x834326d]
/usr/sbin/smbd(brl_lock+0x4a3)[0x82d1f23]
/usr/sbin/smbd(do_lock+0x147)[0x82cc517]
/usr/sbin/smbd[0x8120467]
/usr/sbin/smbd[0x8121e7a]
/usr/sbin/smbd(reply_trans2+0x6ef)[0x8123b5f]
/usr/sbin/smbd[0x8145848]
/usr/sbin/smbd[0x81481ad]
/usr/sbin/smbd[0x8148bd2]
/usr/sbin/smbd(run_events+0x13c)[0x8353cac]
/usr/sbin/smbd(smbd_process+0x791)[0x8147cd1]
/usr/sbin/smbd[0x8623a25]
/usr/sbin/smbd(run_events+0x13c)[0x8353cac]
/usr/sbin/smbd[0x8353f4e]
/usr/sbin/smbd(_tevent_loop_once+0x9b)[0x835458b]
/usr/sbin/smbd(main+0xc12)[0x8624732]
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe5)[0xb7c71775]
/usr/sbin/smbd[0x80c3e91]
=== Memory map: 



This is almost certainly bug 6776 which I just
committed a fix for.

I'm planning a back-port, what specific Samba
version do you need the fix for ?

Jeremy.
  


Thanks for this fix, i've patched my Samba 3.4.2 with your fix and the 
locktest2 works fine... Actualy i can't say if this fix solve my 
problem, i've disabled mounting CIFS on my linux boxes because my 
student can't compile on CIFS share (cf my message related to this 
problem), so for instance i've tranformed my CIFS shares in NFS 
shares it's less secure but it works...


But the bug 6776 describe a behavior really near of my problem. I will 
tell you if i can re-enabled CIFS on my linux boxes a day !


Thanks for your fix !
Bruno

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] smbd Crash

[Bruno MACADRE]

Hi,

I don't stop to have problems with samba :s ...

Now after having workaround the bug of scanning all LDAP users for each
connexion... smbd crash very often.

In some workstation log files i can see something like this :

...
[2009/10/01 16:28:12,  2] smbd/open.c:580(open_file)
  baala opened file .profiles/firefox/cookies.sqlite-journal read=No
write=No (numopen=20)
[2009/10/01 16:28:12,  2] smbd/close.c:612(close_normal_file)
  baala closed file .profiles/firefox/cookies.sqlite-journal
(numopen=19) NT_STATUS_OK
*** glibc detected *** /usr/sbin/smbd: realloc(): invalid next size:
0x0955c5c8 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0xb7cca604]
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0xb7cce1b1]
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(realloc+0x106)[0xb7cceee6]
/usr/sbin/smbd(Realloc+0x7d)[0x834326d]
/usr/sbin/smbd(brl_lock+0x4a3)[0x82d1f23]
/usr/sbin/smbd(do_lock+0x147)[0x82cc517]
/usr/sbin/smbd[0x8120467]
/usr/sbin/smbd[0x8121e7a]
/usr/sbin/smbd(reply_trans2+0x6ef)[0x8123b5f]
/usr/sbin/smbd[0x8145848]
/usr/sbin/smbd[0x81481ad]
/usr/sbin/smbd[0x8148bd2]
/usr/sbin/smbd(run_events+0x13c)[0x8353cac]
/usr/sbin/smbd(smbd_process+0x791)[0x8147cd1]
/usr/sbin/smbd[0x8623a25]
/usr/sbin/smbd(run_events+0x13c)[0x8353cac]
/usr/sbin/smbd[0x8353f4e]
/usr/sbin/smbd(_tevent_loop_once+0x9b)[0x835458b]
/usr/sbin/smbd(main+0xc12)[0x8624732]
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe5)[0xb7c71775]
/usr/sbin/smbd[0x80c3e91]
=== Memory map: 
...

The problem is when this event appear, the smbd of the user crash and
put the smbd service in a unusable state... All users already connected
can continue to work but no more connexion are allowed, and i see lot of
smbd defunct process apprearing.

At this time the samba 3.4.1 (and 3.4.2) are unusable at all beacause
this behavior appears many dozens time per day... I've tested all the
hardware of the server and no problem. The server was equiped with 2
QuadCore E5430 @ 2.66 and 4Gb of memory. I've got 64 Workstations into
the domain (all workstation have dual-boot WinXP Pro / Ubuntu 9.04), and
about 600 users.

Any idea ?

Regards,
Bruno

-- 

Bruno MACADRE
---
 Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseau | Systems and Network Engineer
 Département Informatique | Department of computer science
 Responsable Réseau et Téléphonie | Telecom and Network Manager
 Université de Rouen  | University of Rouen
---
Coordonnées / Contact :
Université de Rouen
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques - Madrillet
Avenue de l'Université - BP12
76801 St Etienne du Rouvray CEDEX

Tél : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-86
Fax : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-87
---

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] smbd Crash

[Bruno MACADRE]

Bruno MACADRE a écrit :
 Hi,
 
   I don't stop to have problems with samba :s ...
 
   Now after having workaround the bug of scanning all LDAP users for each
 connexion... smbd crash very often.
 
   In some workstation log files i can see something like this :
 
 ...
 [2009/10/01 16:28:12,  2] smbd/open.c:580(open_file)
   baala opened file .profiles/firefox/cookies.sqlite-journal read=No
 write=No (numopen=20)
 [2009/10/01 16:28:12,  2] smbd/close.c:612(close_normal_file)
   baala closed file .profiles/firefox/cookies.sqlite-journal
 (numopen=19) NT_STATUS_OK
 *** glibc detected *** /usr/sbin/smbd: realloc(): invalid next size:
 0x0955c5c8 ***
 === Backtrace: =
 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0xb7cca604]
 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0xb7cce1b1]
 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(realloc+0x106)[0xb7cceee6]
 /usr/sbin/smbd(Realloc+0x7d)[0x834326d]
 /usr/sbin/smbd(brl_lock+0x4a3)[0x82d1f23]
 /usr/sbin/smbd(do_lock+0x147)[0x82cc517]
 /usr/sbin/smbd[0x8120467]
 /usr/sbin/smbd[0x8121e7a]
 /usr/sbin/smbd(reply_trans2+0x6ef)[0x8123b5f]
 /usr/sbin/smbd[0x8145848]
 /usr/sbin/smbd[0x81481ad]
 /usr/sbin/smbd[0x8148bd2]
 /usr/sbin/smbd(run_events+0x13c)[0x8353cac]
 /usr/sbin/smbd(smbd_process+0x791)[0x8147cd1]
 /usr/sbin/smbd[0x8623a25]
 /usr/sbin/smbd(run_events+0x13c)[0x8353cac]
 /usr/sbin/smbd[0x8353f4e]
 /usr/sbin/smbd(_tevent_loop_once+0x9b)[0x835458b]
 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0xc12)[0x8624732]
 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe5)[0xb7c71775]
 /usr/sbin/smbd[0x80c3e91]
 === Memory map: 
 ...
 
 The problem is when this event appear, the smbd of the user crash and
 put the smbd service in a unusable state... All users already connected
 can continue to work but no more connexion are allowed, and i see lot of
 smbd defunct process apprearing.
 
 At this time the samba 3.4.1 (and 3.4.2) are unusable at all beacause
 this behavior appears many dozens time per day... I've tested all the
 hardware of the server and no problem. The server was equiped with 2
 QuadCore E5430 @ 2.66 and 4Gb of memory. I've got 64 Workstations into
 the domain (all workstation have dual-boot WinXP Pro / Ubuntu 9.04), and
 about 600 users.
 
 Any idea ?
 
 Regards,
 Bruno
 

So,

I've recompiled my samba 3.4.2 and ran through valgrind to show what
happening :

- First thing, through valgrind i don't see any crash with memory dump
(see my previous message) during last 2 hours

- When i analyse de valgrind logfile produced i see a lot of error
messages like these :

==12818== Invalid read of size 1
==12818==at 0x53C93F0: _nss_files_setnetgrent (in
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnss_files-2.9.so)
==12818== ...
==12818== ...
==12818==by 0x41975B: run_events (events.c:126)
==12818==  Address 0x4f0f887 is 1 bytes before a block of size 120 alloc'd
==12818==at 0x4826FDE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
==12818==by 0x4B92737: getdelim (in /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.9.so)
==12818== ...
==12818== ...
==12818==by 0x20FE37: switch_message (process.c:1377)
==12818==by 0x2127EC: process_smb (process.c:1408)

I don't know if this kind of allocation errors is normal (if any samba
developper team read this ^^), but i think it's a clue for the crash of
smbd (with the realloc errors like in my previous message).

see you later for further informations... i return checking memory
leaks of samba ^^

Regards,
Bruno


-- 

Bruno MACADRE
---
 Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseau | Systems and Network Engineer
 Département Informatique | Department of computer science
 Responsable Réseau et Téléphonie | Telecom and Network Manager
 Université de Rouen  | University of Rouen
---
Coordonnées / Contact :
Université de Rouen
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques - Madrillet
Avenue de l'Université - BP12
76801 St Etienne du Rouvray CEDEX

Tél : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-86
Fax : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-87
---

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] smbd Crash

[Bruno MACADRE]

Volker Lendecke a écrit :
 On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 02:54:24PM +0200, Bruno MACADRE wrote:

 You might try to replace your valid users = @somegroup
 with valid users = +somegroup. These fixes seem normal,
 although it would help a lot if you did not cut 90% of the
 stack trace.
 
 Volker
Hi Volker,

Thanks for this tips, i will try it ASAP...

Following the entire stack trace for one process :


==12818== Invalid read of size 1
==12818==at 0x53C93F0: _nss_files_setnetgrent (in
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnss_files-2.9.so)
==12818==by 0x4C37B7D: innetgr (in /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.9.so)
==12818==by 0x1A8151: user_in_netgroup (password.c:409)
==12818==by 0x1AAA11: token_contains_name_in_list (share_access.c:131)
==12818==by 0x1EEBC9: change_to_user (uid.c:134)
==12818==by 0x214F6D: make_connection_snum (service.c:930)
==12818==by 0x216990: make_connection (service.c:1204)
==12818==by 0x1CCF67: reply_tcon_and_X (reply.c:677)
==12818==by 0x20FE37: switch_message (process.c:1377)
==12818==by 0x2127EC: process_smb (process.c:1408)
==12818==by 0x213241: smbd_server_connection_handler (process.c:1887)
==12818==by 0x41975B: run_events (events.c:126)
==12818==  Address 0x4f0f887 is 1 bytes before a block of size 120 alloc'd
==12818==at 0x4826FDE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
==12818==by 0x4B92737: getdelim (in /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.9.so)
==12818==by 0x53C93D3: _nss_files_setnetgrent (in
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnss_files-2.9.so)
==12818==by 0x4C37B7D: innetgr (in /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.9.so)
==12818==by 0x1A8151: user_in_netgroup (password.c:409)
==12818==by 0x1AAA11: token_contains_name_in_list (share_access.c:131)
==12818==by 0x1EEBC9: change_to_user (uid.c:134)
==12818==by 0x214F6D: make_connection_snum (service.c:930)
==12818==by 0x216990: make_connection (service.c:1204)
==12818==by 0x1CCF67: reply_tcon_and_X (reply.c:677)
==12818==by 0x20FE37: switch_message (process.c:1377)
==12818==by 0x2127EC: process_smb (process.c:1408)
==12818==
==12818== Invalid read of size 1
==12818==at 0x53C93F0: _nss_files_setnetgrent (in
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnss_files-2.9.so)
==12818==by 0x4C37B7D: innetgr (in /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.9.so)
==12818==by 0x1A8254: user_in_netgroup (password.c:425)
==12818==by 0x1AAA11: token_contains_name_in_list (share_access.c:131)
==12818==by 0x1EEBC9: change_to_user (uid.c:134)
==12818==by 0x214F6D: make_connection_snum (service.c:930)
==12818==by 0x216990: make_connection (service.c:1204)
==12818==by 0x1CCF67: reply_tcon_and_X (reply.c:677)
==12818==by 0x20FE37: switch_message (process.c:1377)
==12818==by 0x2127EC: process_smb (process.c:1408)
==12818==by 0x213241: smbd_server_connection_handler (process.c:1887)
==12818==by 0x41975B: run_events (events.c:126)
==12818==  Address 0x4f0fb37 is 1 bytes before a block of size 120 alloc'd
==12818==at 0x4826FDE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
==12818==by 0x4B92737: getdelim (in /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.9.so)
==12818==by 0x53C93D3: _nss_files_setnetgrent (in
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnss_files-2.9.so)
==12818==by 0x4C37B7D: innetgr (in /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.9.so)
==12818==by 0x1A8254: user_in_netgroup (password.c:425)
==12818==by 0x1AAA11: token_contains_name_in_list (share_access.c:131)
==12818==by 0x1EEBC9: change_to_user (uid.c:134)
==12818==by 0x214F6D: make_connection_snum (service.c:930)
==12818==by 0x216990: make_connection (service.c:1204)
==12818==by 0x1CCF67: reply_tcon_and_X (reply.c:677)
==12818==by 0x20FE37: switch_message (process.c:1377)
==12818==by 0x2127EC: process_smb (process.c:1408)
==12818==
==12818== ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 81 from 3)
==12818== malloc/free: in use at exit: 444,418 bytes in 890 blocks.
==12818== malloc/free: 12,782 allocs, 11,892 frees, 1,456,092 bytes
allocated.
==12818== For counts of detected errors, rerun with: -v
==12818== searching for pointers to 890 not-freed blocks.
==12818== checked 740,432 bytes.


Best regards,
Bruno

-- 

Bruno MACADRE
---
 Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseau | Systems and Network Engineer
 Département Informatique | Department of computer science
 Responsable Réseau et Téléphonie | Telecom and Network Manager
 Université de Rouen  | University of Rouen
---
Coordonnées / Contact :
Université de Rouen
Faculté des Sciences et Techniques - Madrillet
Avenue de l'Université - BP12
76801 St Etienne du Rouvray CEDEX

Tél : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-86
Fax : +33 (0)2-32-95-51-87
---

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org

Re: [Samba] Rename Computer In Samba Domain: Access Is Denied

[Bruno MACADRE]

Hi,

   I've had a similar behavior in compiling 3.4.2 from scratch, not for 
the library path (--prefix works correctly on ./configure), but for the 
confdir.


   I proceed like this : ./configure --prefix=/usr 
--sysconfdir=/etc/samba  --libdir=/usr/lib   (other options)

  make
  make install

   But when I launch any tools compiled (testparm, pdbedit, smbd, nmbd, 
...) all are searching smb.conf into /usr/lib. After a few research, it 
appears that Mafefile contain CONFIGDIR=/usr/lib (and not /etc/samba 
like it must...) after changing CONFIGDIR in the Makefile and make, all 
works fine.


   Maybe your problem resides into the Makefile ? Have you try to to 
use some options into your configure (like --libdir) ?


   Regards,
   Bruno

m a écrit :

Ah, thanks. I tested 3.3.8 and 3.4.2. On 3.3.8 the computer rename
still fails with the same log symptoms, but on 3.4.2 the rename
actually succeeds. I reckon this is a bug in the 3.2 and 3.3 series.

As an aside, in compiling these versions from scratch I am puzzled by
if the install scripts (make install) are expected to handle setting
up shared library locations. i.e., the shared libraries are installed
into /usr/local/samba/lib but the script doesn't appear to do any
configuration to enable these to be found when the binaries are
loaded.

Is this intended to be beyond the scope of the makefiles? Looking
around, things like Chapter 42 of the Samba How To (How to Compile
Samba) talk about doing a make install and subsequently running the
daemons as if there's no other steps to be dealt with.

(I did manually set up my ld.so.conf to search the samba/lib directory
but don't know if this should've been necessary.)

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
  

On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 05:09:00PM -0700, m wrote:


It still doesn't work and I tried the same on a different Samba
installation which is version 3.3.2 and it behaved the same way. (Thus
covering versions 3.2.3 and 3.3.2).

I didn't mention before, this is with passdb backend = tdbsam.

I've been continuing to study the issue and I think the relevant error line is

[2009/10/01 16:59:35,  2]
rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:access_check_samr_function(246)
  _samr_SetUserInfo: ACCESS DENIED (granted: 0x000d04e4;  required: 0x00b0)
  

Ah. Please upgrade to the latest 3.3.8 relesae which had
some work in this area (or 3.4.2).

Jeremy




--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] Too much init_sam_from_ldap...

[Bruno MACADRE]

Bruno MACADRE a écrit :
 Hi !
 
I'm working in a educational administration, i've made a domain with
 a Samba 3.4.1 PDC with a LDAP backend. When a user log into an XP
 Workstation, i see in the log file a lot of init_sam_from_ldap. In
 fact, instead of scanning only the user who try to connect, a lot of
 them are scanned. I've got about 600 account into the LDAP so the time
 needed by the user to connect into the workstation is a little increased.
 
The problem is also more important when i've pratices sessions
 because i've between 16 and 64 users that try to log onto the domain at
 the same time. I see init_sam_from_ldap into all of workstation log
 files (on the samba server) and the load average of the LDAP server
 increase dramatically... On a practice session with only 16 users
 connecting at the same time, the elapsed time before the user can use
 his workstation is between 5 and 10 minutes !!! When only 1 user try to
 connect (from the same workstation) the time is lesser than 20 seconds...
 
How can I stop (or limit) all of this init_sam_from_ldap..., to let
 all of my students working properly ??
 
Thanks by advance,
Bruno
 
 Following : Usefull informations
 
 * Sample of workstation SAMBA logfile :
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: benoijod
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
  push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 3
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/uid.c:428(push_conn_ctx)
  push_conn_ctx(102) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 3
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
  pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
  pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
  pop_sec_ctx (12268, 1) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
  push_sec_ctx(12268, 1) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/uid.c:428(push_conn_ctx)
  push_conn_ctx(102) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
  push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/uid.c:428(push_conn_ctx)
  push_conn_ctx(102) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: chevamic
 ...
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: delapmic
 ...
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: demarjoh
 ...
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: ouldbahm
 ...
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: molinste
 ...
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: baerrud
 ...
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: brihifay
 ...
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: chomacam
 ...
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: colomben
 ...
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: ducroant
 ...
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: ouldmyou
 ...
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: mokadabd
 ...
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: antiomar
 ...
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: andrirad
 ...
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: aprilame
 ...
 [2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: duperjon
 ...
 ...
 ...
 
 * The LDAP Server : DELL PowerEdge 2950 with 2x QuadCore and 4Gb Memory
 * The SAMBA PDC : DELL PowerEdge 1950 with 2x QuadCore and 4Gb Memory
 
 
 PS: Sorry for my poor english :-)
 

I investigate a little more since my last mail :

I've downgraded my SAMBA 3.4.1 to SAMBA 3.3.7 the problem is the same

Re: [Samba] Too much init_sam_from_ldap...

[Bruno MACADRE]

Finally i've opened a bug on samba.org (Bug #6771).

At this time i've made a workaround using pdbedit during the night to
translate an ldapsam backend into smbpasswd backend :

# pdbedit -i ldapsam:ldap://ldapserver/; -e
smbpasswd:/var/lib/samba/private/smbpasswd

It's a really bad workaround but i can't stop my production anymore...

With this workaround the time needed for 1 user to log into any
workstation is lesser than 5 seconds (it's amazing ^^)

I hope that somebody find something better than my workaround, i don't
like this kind of poor work...

regards,
Bruno
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] Too much init_sam_from_ldap...

[Bruno MACADRE]

Hi !

   I'm working in a educational administration, i've made a domain with 
a Samba 3.4.1 PDC with a LDAP backend. When a user log into an XP 
Workstation, i see in the log file a lot of init_sam_from_ldap. In 
fact, instead of scanning only the user who try to connect, a lot of 
them are scanned. I've got about 600 account into the LDAP so the time 
needed by the user to connect into the workstation is a little increased.


   The problem is also more important when i've pratices sessions 
because i've between 16 and 64 users that try to log onto the domain at 
the same time. I see init_sam_from_ldap into all of workstation log 
files (on the samba server) and the load average of the LDAP server 
increase dramatically... On a practice session with only 16 users 
connecting at the same time, the elapsed time before the user can use 
his workstation is between 5 and 10 minutes !!! When only 1 user try to 
connect (from the same workstation) the time is lesser than 20 seconds...


   How can I stop (or limit) all of this init_sam_from_ldap..., to 
let all of my students working properly ??


   Thanks by advance,
   Bruno

Following : Usefull informations

* Sample of workstation SAMBA logfile :
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
 init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: benoijod
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
 push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 3
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/uid.c:428(push_conn_ctx)
 push_conn_ctx(102) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 3
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
 pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
 pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
 pop_sec_ctx (12268, 1) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
 push_sec_ctx(12268, 1) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/uid.c:428(push_conn_ctx)
 push_conn_ctx(102) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
 push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/uid.c:428(push_conn_ctx)
 push_conn_ctx(102) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
 init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: chevamic
...
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
 init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: delapmic
...
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
 init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: demarjoh
...
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
 init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: ouldbahm
...
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
 init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: molinste
...
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
 init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: baerrud
...
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
 init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: brihifay
...
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
 init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: chomacam
...
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
 init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: colomben
...
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
 init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: ducroant
...
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
 init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: ouldmyou
...
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
 init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: mokadabd
...
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
 init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: antiomar
...
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
 init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: andrirad
...
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
 init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: aprilame
...
[2009/09/29 19:13:34,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap)
 init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: duperjon
...
...
...

* The LDAP Server : DELL PowerEdge 2950 with 2x QuadCore and 4Gb Memory
* The SAMBA PDC : DELL PowerEdge 1950 with 2x QuadCore and 4Gb Memory


PS: Sorry for my poor english :-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba