[Samba] Calculating file size.

2003-06-18 Thread David Gilligan, Nyfix O'seas, Inc.
Hello!
As it happens I am having some real nightmares with this too.

Using NETGEAR ND520 NAS devices [Yes! I know - rod for own back...]
But the fact it is a Linux device sold me ahead of a W2K Appliance

Win2K reports:

Folder #1
19,969 Files, 1578 folders
Size: 2.36Gb
S-O-D: 11.3Gb
Notes: This is a user's 'Home Drive' Lots of disparate files  Directories

Folder #2
15,151 Files, 595 folders
Size: 292Mb
S-O-D: 7.54Gb
Notes: As above

Folder #3

114 Files, 1 folder
Size: 857Mb
S-O-D: 895Mb
Notes: JAVA developer's archive - all but one are ZIP files



Sure, I'll be obseleting these NAS soon but my plan was to build a custom
Linux Samba server to handle the task.  Now I'm not so sure

-DG

IT Manager
ISV

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Calculating file size.

2003-06-18 Thread David Gilligan, Nyfix O'seas, Inc.
OK.  Maybe the 'not-so-sure' was a bit provocative on this list. G

As I can't afford a 'Filer', Samba is ~obviously~ my best option.

WinXP reports the same figures though - maybe the answer is another DLT
drive direct onto the (New-Improved!) Samba box; rather than mapping drives
to the W2K backup server.

Nevertheless, the sizes can't be *real* - according to the stats my drive is
3 times bigger than it was when I bought it!
Point taken on the journaling FS.  Can anyone compare small file performance
between RH ext3 and ReiserFS?

Made me think - thanks for the input

-DG


 -Original Message-
 From: Jose Luis Tallon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 18 June 2003 6:06 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Samba] Calculating file size.


 At 17:13 18/06/2003 +0100, you wrote:
 Hello!
 As it happens I am having some real nightmares with this too.
 
 Using NETGEAR ND520 NAS devices [Yes! I know - rod for own back...]
 But the fact it is a Linux device sold me ahead of a W2K Appliance
 
 [snip]

 If those S-O-D figures are real ( I mean, W2K is not making them up ),
 you'd rather use ReiserFS for your Linux Samba server -- it would
 save you
 *tons* of disk

 Sure, I'll be obseleting these NAS soon but my plan was to build a custom
 Linux Samba server to handle the task.  Now I'm not so sure

 Why ?


 -DG
 
 IT Manager
 ISV
 
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba