[Samba] Only browsing and net view \\smbserver fails with unassigned share names :(

2004-02-16 Thread Edmond
Dear Samba List,

I'm having a browsing problem with W2k on my 2.0.9 Samba
server and now you are my last hope to help me solving my problem.
Not working is access from Win2k Clients:

net view \\ixdp425 is the first test that fails, not meaning
to terminate with error, but to produce the following unexpected output:
Name Typ  LokalBeschreibung (Description)
---
  IPC
  Platte (Disk)
Der Befehl wurde erfolgreich ausgeführt. (Command terminated successfully!)
Searching for Computers in W2k will also not produce any results
When samba isn't running the Server
Browsing Entire Network will produce an Error:
Ixdp425 cannot be accessed, the network name was not found.
Explorer is showing up two shares but they don't have any
names assigned to.
What is working:
But I'm able to net use the shares from the W2k clients, or to direct
access the shares by name e.g. with win commander by cd \\ixdp425\temp
Access from Linux Client is fine and produces the following:
Domain=[HOME] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.0.9]
  Sharename  Type  Comment
  -    ---
  temp   Disk  temporary space
  IPC$   IPC   IPC Service (Samba 2.0.9)
  Server   Comment
  ----
  IXDP425  Samba 2.0.9
  MOBILE
  WorkgroupMaster
  ----
  HOME IXDP425
I also tried Samba 2.0.7 before, I tried from my W2k Notebook with almost no
included Service Packs
My server is an Intel Arm Xscale based on Snapgears uC-Linux with Glibc
2.2.5, I'm running the Intel Access Library Version 1.4 and Kernel Version 2.4.20
My smb.conf is as following simple
snip
[global]
  workgroup=OFFICE
  encrypt passwords=yes
  netbios name=ixdp425
  preferred master = yes
  local master = yes
  domain master = yes
  browseable = yes
[temp]
  comment = temporary space
  browse list = yes
snap
I tried almost every complex and simple configuration, with/without
lokal and/or domain masters for more then 4days now without success.
So I hope someone else has some better ideas to solve my problem than me.

Thanks in advance and best regards,

Edmond

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Re: hardware question

2004-02-13 Thread Edmond
Hi Ivo,

I think it depends on your network and data structure of the accessed files.
If anyone else knows somethings better please correct me, I`m only Hardware 
Developper, and only Administrator for my own small networks.

 Ivo Dancet wrote:
 What hardware would be able to do this with ease:

E.g. if you use a 100mBit EthernetCard almost every actual Hardware better than 
P300+ 64MB+ IDE/UDMA33+ will be able to manage the troughput.

 There would be about a hundred (maybe 150 later on) client pc's (win xp
 and some windows 98) for about 600 students and teachers.
The first performanceproblems you will maybe get, if caching of webpages is used
meaning to generate much traffic with very little Files, resilting in massive 
seek times of your harddisk.

1st example)
For the amount of People (600ppl) and traffic peaks you will have to think about 
the latest Network and IDE-Hardware thats existing.
For example Gigabit Ethernet as a backbone if you have some other routers that 
are able to cache your your traffic.

2nd more cheap and easy solution)
Using some more 100MBit Fast Ethernet Cards in your server to spread the traffic
at the entrance to your Motherboard.
Calculate: 1Card means 8MByte/s maximum throughput. Your Standard PCI Bus is 
32Bit wide and 33MHz fast = 4Byte * 33*10^6 = 132MByte/s.

The traffic has to go first from Ethernet to Memory and second from Memory to 
harddisk which means to divide your maximum throughput by 2 = max. usable 66MByte/s.
So it makes no sense to insert more than 6Cards into your server (which is 
already al lot!)

For these traffic Peaks your IDE Hardware (16Bit wide ) should be able to 
transfer more than 66MByte/s but don't forget about the seek times!
So in your case I would prefer ATA-6 (133MHz) or maybe serial ATA?
You can also think about a Raid System you can use to double your IDE- 
Datathrouput, but that means also to to reduce your relyablillity.

Better in my opinion is the following:
1.) Increase your server Memory to e.g. 1GB+ to reduce the seek times of your 
IDE Hardware.
2.) If your student Accounts are working with Linux and are having their home 
accounts on one of your servers, it is maybe possible to generate much less 
network traffic, because only Input and Ouput is transferred over the Network, 
Not the data itself (export DISPLAY).

 Off course I do want to backup stuff too.
Less numer of disks will make backups easier. (I'm using rsync for dayly backups 
also from disk to disk) So only the changed data has to be transferred. And only 
the oldest data has to be overwritten. You have alltime a last day fullbackup, 
with only incremental data transfers :-) (At least very fine for me)

But please be careful with all what I said and build up your own Mind. Mybe some 
others will answer to my silly statements ;-)

I must install a samba server as PDC for my school. The server would 
authenticate users using openldap (on the same server). And if possible, 
not used right now!


I would also run an intranet on it (apache, php, mysql).
They have to have home dirs and there will also be some other shares, 
including one for printing on the server.
should be not any problem in my opinion

Hope to help you a little and have a nice day,

Edmond

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Browsing and Test 8 (diagnosis.txt): net view \\xscale fails with no assigned share names (Smb-2.0.9 Snapgear Win2k)

2004-02-12 Thread Edmond Dantes
Dear Samba Gurus,

having a browsing problem with W2k (German Version) on my 2.0.9 server
(also tried 2.0.7 before), you are my last hope to help me soling my
problem!
Everything is working fine accessing the samba server from linux, no
problem at all, all shares are listet with exact namewith smbclient -L
ixdp425 (Intel Xscale Developper Plattform ixp425 Proz.)
I'm also able to net use the shares from the W2k clients, or to direct
access the shares by name e.g. with win commander by cd \\ixdp425\temp
the test net view \\ixdp425 is the first test that fails, not meaning
to terminate with error, but to produce the following unexpected output:
Name Typ  LokalBeschreibung (Description)
---
  IPC
  Platte (Disk)
Der Befehl wurde erfolgreich ausgeführt.
(Command terminated successfully!)
The corresponding Linux test with smbclient -Lixdp425 will show the
following correct share names
Domain=[HOME] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.0.9]

  Sharename  Type  Comment
  -    ---
  temp   Disk  temporary space
  IPC$   IPC   IPC Service (Samba 2.0.9)
  Server   Comment
  ----
  IXDP425  Samba 2.0.9
  MOBILE
  WorkgroupMaster
  ----
  HOME IXDP425
My server is an Intel Arm Xscale based on Snapgears uC-Linux with Glibc
2.2.5
I'm running the Intel Access Library Version 1.3 and Kernel Version 2.4.20
My smb.conf is as following simple
snip
[global]
  workgroup=OFFICE
  encrypt passwords=yes
  netbios name=ixdp425
  preferred master = yes
  local master = yes
  domain master = yes
  browseable = yes
[temp]
  comment = temporary space
  browse list = yes
snap
Searching in Windows 2000 will also produce any results, only when samba
isn't running the developpers board is found.
Browsing the Entire Network the explorer will also produce an Error in
german: (Auf Ixdp425 kann nicht zugegriffen werden, der Netzwerkname
wurde nicht gefunden.) which means
in my translation Ixdp425 cannot be accessed, the network name was not
found. It's showing up to shares in the tree, but they don't have any
names assigned to.
I tried almost every complex and simple configuration, with/without
lokal and/or domain masters for more then 4days now without success.
So I hope someone else has some better ideas to solve my problem than me
Thanks in advance and best regards,
Edmond

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba