Re: [Samba] Winbind Samba 3.5.1
Winbind log shows: [13916]: request interface version [13916]: request location of privileged pipe [13916]: pam auth markr [13753]: dual pam auth markr could not open handle to NETLOGON pipe Plain-text authentication for user markr returned NT_STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE (PAM: 4) [13916]: request interface version [13916]: request misc info [13916]: request netbios name [13916]: request domain name [13916]: domain_info [APPEL] [13916]: pam auth crap domain: [APPEL] user: markr [13753]: pam auth crap domain: APPEL user: markr could not open handle to NETLOGON pipe (error: NT_STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE) NTLM CRAP authentication for user [APPEL]\[markr] returned NT_STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE (PAM: 4) Just saw those on samba 3.5.2. Everything works (wbinfo -t, wbinfo -u, etc), except authentication through winbind. My scenario is a PDC with winbind authenticating on the same machine. Used to work fine on 3.4.x. Any hints? Thanks, Giovani Moda __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5035 (20100416) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba + BDE and slow speed on reading (long)
SO_RCVBUF=1 has resolved the problem. I don't know why, but it did. Both times, the server was connected to a D-Link DES-1024 switch. Switching NIC's and cables had no effect, but SO_RCVBUF=1 solved it instantly. Could it be related tho this version of samba and the problem I'm having now? Any thoughts? Thanks, Giovani Moda -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba To: samba@lists.samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba + BDE and slow speed on reading (long)
Hello list. I'm new here, and I'm joining because I'm having a problem wich I can't figure out the solution myself. Here's what's happening: A Samba 3.0.24 is serving files to seven Windows XP clients. Three of those clients run an application with a BDE database. The problem is that when running this application on Samba, it gets very, VERY slow, causing it to hang. I have noticed also an unusual low speed when receiving files from the samba server over network. When sending files to the server, the speed is OK. Since the databases used by that apllication have about 50Mb each, the problem must be caused by that slow speed on receiving files from the server. I've twiked the configuration a bit, and came to this results: socket options = SO_RCVBUF=65535 SO_SNDBUF=65535 TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY - Very slow on reading, fast when writing socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY - still slow on read, but a little better. Fast when writing socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=32768 - significant improvement when reading files, but the application still hangs due to the slow speed. Fast when reading. socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=32768 SO_RCVBUF=32768 - same as above, but writing speed shows deterioration. Other significant parameters: max connections = 50 dos filetimes = yes max open files = 4000 nt acl support = yes preserve case = yes strict locking = no deadtime = 15 unix charset = iso8859-1 display charset = cp850 oplocks = no kernel oplocks = no level2 oplocks = no local master = yes os level = 64 domain master = yes time server = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes name resolve order = wins bcast host lmhosts wins support = yes wins proxy = yes dns proxy = no So, I went for socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=32768 and got these results: Copying a 45678592 bytes throug samba, it takes from 45 to 60 seconds to transfer. The same file though FTP takes only 3.9 seconds. I know FTP is the fastest protocol and cannot be compared to samba, but still, that's a HUGE difference. As a desperate measure, I've copied the whole database to a XP machine, shared the folder to the network, mapped it to the other stations, and the application runs perfectly again. Conclusion: there's definitely a problem when reading files from samba server. It's not network related, since FTP is really fast, and when serving the database from XP, the speed is OK too. The server is a brand new Core 2 Duo E4500, 2GB RAM, 160 GB HD SATAII, NIC Realtek r8169 connected to a DES-1008D Gigabit Switch. The distro in question is FC5 fully updated. As a related topic, I've came across a situation (two times and couting) when writing files to the samba server is painfully slow. On both cases, setting SO_RCVBUF=1 has resolved the problem. I don't know why, but it did. Both times, the server was connected to a D-Link DES-1024 switch. Switching NIC's and cables had no effect, but SO_RCVBUF=1 solved it instantly. Could it be related tho this version of samba and the problem I'm having now? Any thoughts? Thanks, Giovani Moda -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba + BDE and slow speed on reading (long)
Several posters have said that the Realtek 8168 and 8169 chips have caused slow file transfers with Samba. They solved their problem by changing to another NIC. Well, it's worth trying. I'll schedule the mainteinance with my client and let you guys know. Any restrictions with D-Link DGE-530T? Thanks, Giovani Dale Giovani Moda - MR Informática wrote: Hello list. I'm new here, and I'm joining because I'm having a problem wich I can't figure out the solution myself. Here's what's happening: A Samba 3.0.24 is serving files to seven Windows XP clients. Three of those clients run an application with a BDE database. The problem is that when running this application on Samba, it gets very, VERY slow, causing it to hang. I have noticed also an unusual low speed when receiving files from the samba server over network. When sending files to the server, the speed is OK. Since the databases used by that apllication have about 50Mb each, the problem must be caused by that slow speed on receiving files from the server. I've twiked the configuration a bit, and came to this results: socket options = SO_RCVBUF=65535 SO_SNDBUF=65535 TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY - Very slow on reading, fast when writing socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY - still slow on read, but a little better. Fast when writing socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=32768 - significant improvement when reading files, but the application still hangs due to the slow speed. Fast when reading. socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=32768 SO_RCVBUF=32768 - same as above, but writing speed shows deterioration. Other significant parameters: max connections = 50 dos filetimes = yes max open files = 4000 nt acl support = yes preserve case = yes strict locking = no deadtime = 15 unix charset = iso8859-1 display charset = cp850 oplocks = no kernel oplocks = no level2 oplocks = no local master = yes os level = 64 domain master = yes time server = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes name resolve order = wins bcast host lmhosts wins support = yes wins proxy = yes dns proxy = no So, I went for socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=32768 and got these results: Copying a 45678592 bytes throug samba, it takes from 45 to 60 seconds to transfer. The same file though FTP takes only 3.9 seconds. I know FTP is the fastest protocol and cannot be compared to samba, but still, that's a HUGE difference. As a desperate measure, I've copied the whole database to a XP machine, shared the folder to the network, mapped it to the other stations, and the application runs perfectly again. Conclusion: there's definitely a problem when reading files from samba server. It's not network related, since FTP is really fast, and when serving the database from XP, the speed is OK too. The server is a brand new Core 2 Duo E4500, 2GB RAM, 160 GB HD SATAII, NIC Realtek r8169 connected to a DES-1008D Gigabit Switch. The distro in question is FC5 fully updated. As a related topic, I've came across a situation (two times and couting) when writing files to the samba server is painfully slow. On both cases, setting SO_RCVBUF=1 has resolved the problem. I don't know why, but it did. Both times, the server was connected to a D-Link DES-1024 switch. Switching NIC's and cables had no effect, but SO_RCVBUF=1 solved it instantly. Could it be related tho this version of samba and the problem I'm having now? Any thoughts? Thanks, Giovani Moda -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba + BDE and slow speed on reading (long)
Hello list. I'm new here, and I'm joining because I'm having a problem wich I can't figure out the solution myself. Here's what's happening: A Samba 3.0.24 is serving files to seven Windows XP clients. Three of those clients run an application with a BDE database. The problem is that when running this application on Samba, it gets very, VERY slow, causing it to hang. I have noticed also an unusual low speed when receiving files from the samba server over network. When sending files to the server, the speed is OK. Since the databases used by that apllication have about 50Mb each, the problem must be caused by that slow speed on receiving files from the server. I've twiked the configuration a bit, and came to this results: socket options = SO_RCVBUF=65535 SO_SNDBUF=65535 TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY - Very slow on reading, fast when writing socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY - still slow on read, but a little better. Fast when writing socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=32768 - significant improvement when reading files, but the application still hangs due to the slow speed. Fast when reading. socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=32768 SO_RCVBUF=32768 - same as above, but writing speed shows deterioration. Other significant parameters: max connections = 50 dos filetimes = yes max open files = 4000 nt acl support = yes preserve case = yes strict locking = no deadtime = 15 unix charset = iso8859-1 display charset = cp850 oplocks = no kernel oplocks = no level2 oplocks = no local master = yes os level = 64 domain master = yes time server = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes name resolve order = wins bcast host lmhosts wins support = yes wins proxy = yes dns proxy = no So, I went for socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=32768 and got these results: Copying a 45678592 bytes throug samba, it takes from 45 to 60 seconds to transfer. The same file though FTP takes only 3.9 seconds. I know FTP is the fastest protocol and cannot be compared to samba, but still, that's a HUGE difference. As a desperate measure, I've copied the whole database to a XP machine, shared the folder to the network, mapped it to the other stations, and the application runs perfectly again. Conclusion: there's definitely a problem when readind files from samba server. It's not network related, since FTP is really fast, and when serving the database from XP, the speed is OK too. The server is a brand new Core 2 Duo E4500, 2GB RAM, 160 GB HD SATAII. The switch is also new. The distro in question is FC5. As a related topic, I've came across a situation (two times and couting) when writing files to the samba server is painfully slow. On both cases, setting SO_RCVBUF=1 has resolved the problem. I don't know why, but it did. Both times, the server was connected to a D-Link DES-1024 switch. Switching NIC's and cables had no effect, but SO_RCVBUF=1 solved it instantly. Could it be related tho this version of samba and the problem I'm having now? Any thoughts? Thanks, Giovani Moda -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3.0.10 errors
Hello, I'm constantly getting those errors on my samba server: [2005/01/24 11:04:16, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(384) read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer [2005/01/24 16:54:32, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected There are logs created with the client's IP numbers, filled with the errors mentioned above, and a log file named 0.0.0.0.log, also with those errors. The things is: there should NOT be log files named after the client's IP number, since my smb.conf have a log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log entry. There are also log files ( the expected ones) named after the client's netbios named that contains no errors at all. It appears that samba is, sometimes, unable to get the netbios name of the clients. I haven't seen those on other versions of samba, so I'm guessing that's not a default (or normal) operation. Everything seems to be working fine, but these error messages are kinda worrying me. Any idea of what those are? My configuration is samba-3.0.10, PDC, security = user. No winbind, no openldap, no ADS. All the clients are Windows XP SP2. Simples as it can be. But still, those errors. I have tried all the settings I know, I've searched everywhere, but no luck on getting those fixed. Any ideas would be much appreciated. Thanks advanced; Giovani -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.1 - Release Date: 19/01/2005 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
