Re: [Samba] samba 3 / AD / krb5_cc_get_principal failed

2004-09-06 Thread Jacky Kim
Update your kerberos5 to version 1.3.* .

Best Regards!
Jacky Kim
.

Hi all,

I successfully joined my Samba 3.0.6 box to our AD tree. wbinfo -t and -u 
work as expected. But when I try to access a share on the samba box (Windows 
AD controller), I am asked for a password, Samba then logs

[2004/09/06 11:49:28, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(173)
   Failed to verify incoming ticket!


winbindd sometimes logs

[2004/09/06 11:42:55, 1] libsmb/clikrb5.c:ads_krb5_mk_req(313)
   krb5_cc_get_principal failed (No credentials cache found)


What is wrong here? Any ideas?

Regards
Olaf
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba




-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] [HELP!!!]: Fail to mount with NULL password in samba 3.0.6

2004-09-05 Thread Jacky Kim
Can anybody answer me?! Thanks in advance!!!

I have patch 3.0.6 with all patchs in http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/post-3.0.6/ ,
and set null passwords = yes in smb.conf. It works well to mount samba share in 
linux box when user alpha have non-empty password. 

But when set alpha's passwork as NULL, I get the follow messages:

# mount -t smbfs -o username=alpha,password= //192.168.3.101/pub /mnt
Anonymous login successful
24968: tree connect failed: ERRDOS - ERRnoaccess
SMB connection failed

And what samba log say:
[2004/08/24 16:30:08, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(312)
  check_ntlm_password:  Authentication for user [alpha] - [alpha] FAILED with 
error NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD


Best Regards!

Jacky Kim
.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] smbpasswd in samba 3.0

2004-09-03 Thread Jacky Kim
Try it:

# (echo password; echo password) | smbpasswd -s -a username


Best Regards!
Jacky Kim
.

For scripting then, what would the appropriate syntax be?

smbpasswd -s -a username password 

this was working fine for me in 2.2.x and 3.0.x until the upgrade 3.0.6

If I want to change password with a script - i.e. single line of code.
what is the appropriate command syntax in 3.0.6?

Jake Holmquist
Manhattan College 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba




-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] [HELP 3.0.6]: Fail to mount with NULL password

2004-08-31 Thread Jacky Kim
# mount -t smbfs -o username=alpha,password= //192.168.3.101/pub /mnt
Anonymous login successful
24968: tree connect failed: ERRDOS - ERRnoaccess
SMB connection failed

# mount -t smbfs -o username=alpha //192.168.3.101/pub /mnt
Password: [ENTER]
Anonymous login successful
24977: tree connect failed: ERRDOS - ERRnoaccess
SMB connection failed


I have set: 
null passwords = yes

And it works well if set alpha's password as non-empty password.

 Hi, I failed to mount samba 3.0.6's share with NULL password:
 
 # mount -t smbfs -o username=alpha,password= //192.168.3.101/pub /mnt
 
 And what samba log say:
   [2004/08/24 16:30:08, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(312)
 check_ntlm_password:  Authentication for user [alpha] - [alpha] FAILED with 
 errorNT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD
 
 But it is ok when using samba 2.2.8a!


Best Regards!

Jacky Kim
.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] [3.0.6]: Fail to mount with NULL password

2004-08-28 Thread Jacky Kim
I have set: 
null passwords = yes

And it works well if set alpha's password as non-empty password.

 Hi, I failed to mount samba 3.0.6's share with NULL password:
 
 # mount -t smbfs -o username=alpha,password= //192.168.3.101/pub /mnt
 
 And what samba log say:
   [2004/08/24 16:30:08, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(312)
 check_ntlm_password:  Authentication for user [alpha] - [alpha] FAILED with 
 errorNT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD
 
 But it is ok when using samba 2.2.8a!


Best Regards!

Jacky Kim
.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] [3.0.6]: Fail to mount with NULL password

2004-08-26 Thread Jacky Kim
Hi, I failed to mount samba 3.0.6's share with NULL password:

# mount -t smbfs -o username=alpha,password= //192.168.3.101/pub /mnt

And what samba log say:
[2004/08/24 16:30:08, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(312)
  check_ntlm_password:  Authentication for user [alpha] - [alpha] FAILED with 
errorNT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD

But it is ok when using samba 2.2.8a!


Best Regards!

Jacky Kim
.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] mount with NULL password

2004-08-24 Thread Jacky Kim
Hi, I failed to mount samba 3.0.6's share with NULL password:

# mount -t smbfs -o username=alpha,password= //192.168.3.101/pub /mnt

And what samba log say:
[2004/08/24 16:30:08, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(312)
  check_ntlm_password:  Authentication for user [alpha] - [alpha] FAILED with 
errorNT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD

But it is ok when using samba 2.2.8a!


Best Regards!

Jacky Kim
.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] smbpasswd in samba 3.0

2004-08-18 Thread Jacky Kim
In samba 2.2.8, smbpasswd can change a user's smb password
without prompt:
# smbpasswd username newpswd

How to do it in samba 3.0? I do want to change user's password
without prompt!

Best regards! 
  
Jacky Kim
.



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] init_iconv Conversion problem

2004-08-06 Thread Jacky Kim
When I reload samba 3.0.5, I got the follow messages:

[2004/08/06 18:08:02, 1] smbd/server.c:open_sockets_smbd(348)
  Reloading services after SIGHUP
[2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(134)
  init_iconv: Conversion from UCS-2LE to CP850 not supported
[2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(142)
  init_iconv: Attempting to replace with conversion from UCS-2LE to ASCII
[2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(134)
  init_iconv: Conversion from UTF-8 to CP850 not supported
[2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(142)
  init_iconv: Attempting to replace with conversion from ASCII to ASCII
[2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(134)
  init_iconv: Conversion from ANSI_X3.4-1968 to CP850 not supported
[2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(142)
  init_iconv: Attempting to replace with conversion from ASCII to ASCII
[2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(134)
  init_iconv: Conversion from CP850 to UCS-2LE not supported
[2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(142)
  init_iconv: Attempting to replace with conversion from ASCII to UCS-2LE
[2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(134)
  init_iconv: Conversion from CP850 to UTF-8 not supported
[2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(142)
  init_iconv: Attempting to replace with conversion from ASCII to ASCII
[2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(134)
  init_iconv: Conversion from CP850 to ANSI_X3.4-1968 not supported
[2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(142)
  init_iconv: Attempting to replace with conversion from ASCII to ASCII
[2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(134)
  init_iconv: Conversion from CP850 to UTF8 not supported
[2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(142)
  init_iconv: Attempting to replace with conversion from ASCII to ASCII
[2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(134)
  init_iconv: Conversion from UTF8 to CP850 not supported
[2004/08/06 18:08:02, 0] lib/charcnv.c:init_iconv(142)
  init_iconv: Attempting to replace with conversion from ASCII to ASCII


Best Regards!

Jacky Kim
.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] RE: win2k server the specified network name is invalid

2004-08-05 Thread Jacky Kim
Hi, it is resolved by Enable NetBIOS over TCP/IP :
Open Windows Explorer 
Right-click on My Network Places 
Select: Properties 
Right-click on Local Area Network 
Select: Properties 
Select: Internet Protocol TCP/IP 
Click on Properties 
Click on Advanced 
Select the WINS tab 
Select Enable NetBIOS over TCP/IP 
Click OK 


I have 2 win2k servers and 1 samba(2.2.8a) server in my LAN.
The 2 win2k servers are samba and can access each other.
The 1st win2k server can access samba server, but the 2nd win2k server can't
access samba server: it say the specified network name is invalid
I check samba log(log level = 2), and get no information!
But when the 1st win2k server access samba server, the log is as follows:

[2004/08/04 17:32:43, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(92)
  netbios connect: name1=*SMBSERV name2=SRV1   






-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] samba 3.0.5 stable?

2004-08-05 Thread Jacky Kim
Why does samba 3.0.5 have so many ploblem? After I copy several files to samba server,
I got the follow message in samba log! 

And where can i get 3.0.6 pre-releases version?

[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name_response(130)
  register_name_response: server at IP 192.168.0.102 rejected our name registration of 
MYG
ROUP1d IP 192.168.0.202 with error code 6.
[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_fail2(417)
  become_local_master_fail2: failed to register name MYGROUP1d on subnet 
192.168.0.202. 
Failed to become a local master browser.
[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_fail2(417)
  become_local_master_fail2: failed to register name MYGROUP1d on subnet 
192.168.0.202. 
Failed to become a local master browser.
[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:standard_success_release(384)
  standard_success_release: Name release for name __MSBROWSE__01 IP 192.168.0.202 on 
sub
net 192.168.0.202. Name was not found on subnet.
[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:standard_fail_register(283)
  standard_fail_register: Failed to register/refresh name MYGROUP1d on subnet 
192.168.0.
202
[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36)
  ===
[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37)
  INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 10323 (3.0.5)
  Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection
[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39)
  ===
[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1398)
  PANIC: internal error
[2004/08/05 17:26:26, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1406)
  BACKTRACE: 1 stack frames:
   #0 nmbd(smb_panic2+0xef) [0x80ab28d]
[2004/08/05 19:18:13, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(619)
  abc (192.168.0.3) connect to service abc initially as user abc (uid=503, gid=100) 
(pid 1
0387)


Best Regards!

Jacky Kim
.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] samba 3.0.5 stable?

2004-08-05 Thread Jacky Kim
Then where or when are the patchs available?

Jacky Kim
.

On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 08:21:39PM +0800, Jacky Kim wrote:
 Why does samba 3.0.5 have so many ploblem? After I copy several files to samba 
 server,
 I got the follow message in samba log! 

Samba 3.0.5 is a security release *only*. It only contains the two known
security fixes over the 3.0.4 release. It does not contain any of the 
bug fixes that were discovered and fixed since 3.0.4.

Jeremy.

.





-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] win2k server the specified network name is invalid

2004-08-04 Thread Jacky Kim
I have 2 win2k servers and 1 samba(2.2.8a) server in my LAN.
The 2 win2k servers are samba and can access each other.
The 1st win2k server can access samba server, but the 2nd win2k server can't
access samba server: it say the specified network name is invalid
I check samba log(log level = 2), and get no information!
But when the 1st win2k server access samba server, the log is as follows:

[2004/08/04 17:32:43, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(92)
  netbios connect: name1=*SMBSERV name2=SRV1   

Best Regards!

Jacky Kim
.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.5 PANIC

2004-07-30 Thread Jacky Kim
Hi, David:

   I don't use printers at all. so i think it has nothing with printer lock.

Best Regards!

Jacky Kim
.

Hi,

This is worrying as we have had exactly the same error with 3.0.2a on
Solaris/cups.

Have you had a problem with printers as well? I believe our error was caused
by printing crashing samba, and a quick fix was to delete the printer lock
file. However, when I emailed the problem, we were told by Samba.org to
upgrade to 3.0.5!

David




-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Samba 3.0.5 PANIC

2004-07-28 Thread Jacky Kim
Hi, all:

   I am using Samba 3.0.5 with patch at http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/post-3.0.4/.
But I found the follow messages in samba log:

  ===
[2004/07/29 01:01:57, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1398)
  PANIC: internal error
[2004/07/29 01:01:57, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1406)
  BACKTRACE: 3 stack frames:
   #0 smbd(smb_panic2+0xef) [0x8179111]
   #1 /lib/libc.so.6(abort+0x18b) [0x4016389b]
   #2 smbd(readdirname+0) [0x81791d1]
[2004/07/29 01:01:57, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725)
  tdb(/var/samba/ntforms.tdb): tdb_reopen: open failed (No such file or directory)
[2004/07/29 01:01:57, 0] smbd/server.c:open_sockets_smbd(419)
  tdb_reopen_all failed.
[2004/07/29 01:01:57, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1398)
  PANIC: tdb_reopen_all failed.
[2004/07/29 01:01:57, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1406)
  BACKTRACE: 1 stack frames:
   #0 smbd(smb_panic2+0xef) [0x8179111]
[2004/07/29 01:01:57, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36)
  ===
[2004/07/29 01:01:57, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37)
  INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 6 in pid 4711 (3.0.5)
  Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection
[2004/07/29 01:01:57, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39)
  ===   

Best Regards!

Jacky Kim
.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] samba 3.0.5 force user problem

2004-07-24 Thread Jacky Kim
Hi, all:

The follow parameters work well in samba 2.2.8a, But I updated samba 
from 2.2.8a to the latest samba 3.0.5 , I can't write 'test' share! 
What is the ploblem?

[test]
  path = /pub/test
  force user = abc
  write list = jacky
  valid users = jacky,abc
  create mode = 0664
  directory mode = 0775

Best Regards!

Jacky Kim
.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Windows 2K outperform Linux/Samba very much?

2004-07-11 Thread Jacky Kim
Thank Mark.

I have tried another test program in Linux, it call 2 C lib functions
(open  fstat) to small files, and I compute the time they take via
gettimeofday system call.

// C code ... 
ret = gettimeofday(before, zone);
fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY);
ret = gettimeofday(after, zone);
interval1 = (after.tv_usec - before.tv_usec);
ret = fstat(fd, buf);
ret = gettimeofday(before, zone);
interval2 = (before.tv_usec - after.tv_usec);
// C code ...

Linux Test results(time unit is usec):
case  open  fstat
    -
1 800   240
1 757   239
2 18175 245
2 17240 246
Case 1: smbmount Linux/samba's share that contains 20,000 small files
set 'case sensitive = Yes' in smb.conf   
Case 2: smbmount Windows's share that contains 20,000 small file

Test analysis:
1. Linux/samba performs much better than Windows as for open system call.
2. The 2 Operation systems have same performance with fstat system call.


But when VB test program in Windows is used, Windows has much better 
perpormance then linux/samba

// VB code ...
Set objFSO = CreateObject(Scripting.FileSystemObject)
thistime = thisnow
If objFSO.FileExists(fn) Then
totle = totle  Check file time   CStr(thisnow - thistime) +  ms 
+ vbCrLf
thistime = thisnow
Set objFile = objFSO.GetFile(fn)
totle = totle  Get object time   CStr(thisnow - thistime) +  ms 
+ vbCrLf
thistime = thisnow
temp = DateValue(CStr(objFile.DateLastModified))
totle = totle  Get date time   CStr(thisnow - thistime) +  ms + 
vbCrLf
End If
// VB code ...

Windows Test results(time unit is msec):
case   FileExists  GetFile  DateLastModified
   --  ---  
1 20   0100
1 00120
1 0061
2 30   10   0
2 30   00
2 10   00
Case 1: map Linux/samba's share that contains 20,000 small files
set 'case sensitive = Yes' in smb.conf  
Case 2: map Windows's share that contains 20,000 small file


Can we get the follow conclusions as for check small file's property:
1. Windows client can get much better performance from Windows's share than others'
2. Linux client can get much better performance from Linux/Samba's share than others'

Best Regards!
Jacky Kim
.

Hi,

The next step is probably to capture some network traces of your
benchmarking test and compare and contrast the NT and Samba backends.

Playing with the negotiated protocol level might win you some more
performance by simplifying the transactions.  It may lose you a lot too
though.  (See max protocol option)

There are the max xmit/socket options/stat cache tweakables.  If you
have logging wound up on the linux box, that can affect performance
greatly too.

How does performance of the filesystem on the linux machine vary with
number of files in the directory ?  Ie, take samba out of the equation
and see if you're running into underlying issues with your file layout.

Splitting your directory into a hierarchical structure is certainly more
scalable than a flat directory.

Mark




-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: Re: [Samba] Windows 2K outperform Linux/Samba very much?

2004-07-08 Thread Jacky Kim
I just want to get small files' property, NOT content.
I heve compared XFS and Reiserfs just now, and found that the results 
are very likely too.

Here, I have seen sub 700MHz P3 systems with IDE disks blow away a dual
900MHz 2K system with SCSI drives in every manner.

I would recommend trying reiserfs, it is superior at handling small
files. This is what we are using.

 
I want to check small files' property(such as date, path, and so on)
 frequently. The files are stored in netwrok driver and their sizes 
 vary from 2KB to 5KB.




-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: Re: [Samba] Windows 2K outperform Linux/Samba very much?

2004-07-08 Thread Jacky Kim
 Sorry, I miss the follow informations:
 1. There are 100,000 files in shared directory.

That's the problem. Because Samba has to present a case insensitive
view of a case-sensitive filesystem we have to scan the entire
directory to ensure a file doesn't exist.

The answer to the why is Samba slow question in this case is
don't do that (put 100,000 files in a directory).

I trid 20,000 files in a directory too, and found the same result:
Windows's share is about 10 times faster than Linux/samba's one 
when get small file's property(NOT content).

Jacky Kim
.





-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Windows 2K outperform Linux/Samba very much?

2004-07-08 Thread Jacky Kim
Thank Mark.

Yeah, it gains about 30% performance raise to set 'case sensitive=yes'.
But Windows's share is still about 8 times faster than Linux/Samba's .

After several tests, I find that XFS's performance is very near to Reisfer
when checking files' property.

So I think the main problem is caused by samba not File system.
Is there any other config I can set?

Best Regards!

Jacky Kim
.

You can use the configuration options to force filenames to a particular
case, and then bypass the slow case-insensitive matching by forcing case
sensitivity:

   mangle case = yes
   case sensitive = yes
   default case = lower
   preserve case = no
   short preserve case = no


However, on sharing a VFAT filesystem, perhaps you can preserve case,
and gain the speed increase by just setting 'case sensitive=yes'.





-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Windows 2K outperform Linux/Samba very much?

2004-07-07 Thread Jacky Kim
Hi, all:

   I want to check small files' property(such as date, path, and so on)
frequently. The files are stored in netwrok driver and their sizes 
vary from 2KB to 5KB.
   
   I found that Windows 2K outperform Linux/Samba very much after I 
campared the bench results. I am very confused about it and who can 
explain it?

The computers' configurations are as follows:

1. PC Client 
It runs the follow VB program to compute the time when check files' property
Operation System:
  Windows 2000 professional

// ...
Set objFSO = CreateObject(Scripting.FileSystemObject)
thistime = thisnow
If objFSO.FileExists(fn) Then
totle = totle  Check file time   CStr(thisnow - thistime) +  ms 
+ vbCrLf
thistime = thisnow
Set objFile = objFSO.GetFile(fn)
totle = totle  Get object time   CStr(thisnow - thistime) +  ms 
+ vbCrLf
thistime = thisnow
temp = DateValue(CStr(objFile.DateLastModified))
totle = totle  Get date time   CStr(thisnow - thistime) +  ms + 
vbCrLf
End If

2. Linux PC Server: 
It provide Linux/Samba shared directory for the client
(1) Operation System 
  kernel = 2.6.6
  file system = xfs
  nic = intel pro 100
  Samba 2.2.8a (I have tried samba 3.0.4, and the result is likely)
(2) smb.conf
  [global]
encrypt passwords = yes
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=4096 SO_SNDBUF=4096
max xmit = 4096
read raw = No
wide links = No
  [pub]  
path = /pub  
guest ok = no  
write list = test
create mode = 0664
directory mode = 0775

3. Windows PC Server:   
It provide Windows shared directory for the client
Operation System:
  Windows 2000 professional

4. Bench results

Windows Linux/Samba  
CHECK OBJECT DATE   CHECK OBJECT DATE
- --    - --  
760 10  120 10  0   203 
750 10  80  20  0   363 
780 10  50  20  761 632 
750 10  50  10  0   173 
800 0   10  40  0   711 

90  0   140 240 212 871 
60  40  90  240 212 821 
90  0   50  210 30  162 
60  50  10  20  220 150 
10  30  20  30  30  160 

0   50  80  741 50  412 
10  40  110 781 10  412 
20  0   70  20  781 381 
10  0   70  10  791 81  
20  20  0   50  21  691 

   NOTE: the unit is ms.

Best Regards!
Jacky Kim
.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Windows 2K outperform Linux/Samba very much?

2004-07-07 Thread Jacky Kim
Sorry, I miss the follow informations:
1. There are 100,000 files in shared directory.
2. Mkfs.xfs data device in linux server, and mount it with noatime option

Jacky Kim
.



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba