[Samba] Moving Samba-3.x Servers to different hardware.

2005-02-09 Thread K. Hawkes
Hi all,

I have tried today to move a Samba 3.0.10 PDC from it's old hardware and OS
(RH9) to it's new hardware and OS (Centos 3.4 - RH Enterprise3).
I copied the files from the old server (password files and such) to the new
server in the relevant directories.
I also copied secrets.tdb and all the other .tdb files that samba uses from
/var/cache/samba or /var/lib/samba.

I start up the new samba (after giving it the same domain name as the old
server) and attempt to logon to the new server from an already-joined PC
(which was joined to the old server). It won't let me login or anything at
all - complains that the username/password are incorrect or that the domain
isn't found.

Rather than ask if I've missed anything (which could be any number of
things) - does anyone out there have a good list of steps to follow to
successfully move one Samba 3.x server to different hardware? At least then
I could follow the list and then report back with what I've found - be it
good or bad.

I have checked the Samba mailing lists and can't see anything that I'm doing
wrong - I even did 'net getlocalsid DOMAIN' on the old server and did 'net
setlocalsid SID' on the new domain - so I'm not sure quite what's going
on.

The IP and Hostname are DIFFERENT for the new server as the old server is
still required up until we swap the hardware over - the reason I'm doing
this now is that I needed to ensure it would work straight off without
having to rejoin any PCs to the domain.

If anyone has any ideas or thoughts could you please E-Mail them to me (as
well as reply to the newsgroup) as I cannot get news of any kind at my
workplace but I can get E-Mail - unfortunately I have no VPN to try this
with, here at home.

Thanking you all in advance.

Mr. K. Hawkes



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Deleting of Desktop Icons

2004-04-10 Thread K. Hawkes
We had this issue also, you need to ensure 3 things :
1) Ensure that the time is being set (as Nigel suggested).
2) Ensure that the C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS area of the client PC
is not filled up with many profiles - e.g. USERNAME USERNAME.000
USERNAME.001 etc...
3) As I don't know what kind of desktop-security you use, I'm not sure how
relevant this next part is.

If you are using POLEDIT to control 'Start Menu' or 'Desktop' locations
(such as redirection),
make sure they are NOT set.

With NT/2K/XP, Samba's 'logon-home', 'logon-drive', 'logon-path' values are
picked up and used
correctly, the only time you would need to specify a user start menu or
desktop is with Win98 clients.

E.g.

logon-path = \\%N\%U\profile
logon-home = \\%N\%U
logon-drive = H:

Provided your profiles exist under \\SERVERNAME\USERNAME\profile (and have
sufficient permissions),
this should sort out your problem, I hope.

If you are using poledit or gpedit with folder redirection, make sure the
policy for start menu/desktop is
NOT CONFIGURED, not set or unset, otherwise if you set it, it doesn't update
profiles properly.
If you unset it, you get the same thing. Not configured basically makes it
use the samba-supplied values.

Hope this helps.

 This could be a time sync problem. Are the
 domain machines syncing time from
 the same source and correctly ?

 I have the same issue as well, on XP and 2k.

 sometimes it actually deletes icons and folders, but most often they are
 recreated after a login.  It might be an issue with roaming profiles
 from the samba side, I never managed to find an answer.



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Samba3 Trust Relationships?

2004-03-22 Thread K. Hawkes
Hey all,

After setting up a migration server (a server which
will act as a test for a Samba 3.x environment), so
we can make sure our migration from Samba 2.2.x
to 3.x goes as smoothly as possible, I've hit upon
a problem, now I am not sure whether this is the
fault of Samba (my configuration) or NT4 or
whether this is infact designed behaviour for
both/either servers. I'd like to overcome the
problem if it's possible but I am not sure how.

Systems :
1x NT4 PDC (NTDOM)
2x W2K Workstations - SP4 - no additional patches.
1x Samba3 PDC (SMBDOM) - Running RH9 (samba-3.0.2a)

I have set up a one-way trust between NTDOM and SMBDOM
so that users on NTDOM joined PC's can connect and login
to both networks, but those connected to SMBDOM can only
login to SMBDOM domain, not both domains as NTDOM connected
PC's can do.

The problem itself (if you can call it a problem) is this :
I have a selection of users on both PDCs. The user I am testing with
this is called 'keith', he exists on both PDCs but has different
passwords. Is a Domain User on both PDCs, has permissions to both
his profile share and home-directory share on both PDCs.

On the UNIX side, he is a member of UNIX group 'users' which
maps to 'Domain Users'. On NT, he is a member of Domain Users.

If I login to NTDOM as keith and then perform a NET USE to a
share on SMBDOM, it asks me for the password for access to the
resource. This is the problem, I, and my colleagues were under the
impression that a trust relationship would allow a user on NTDOM
to access resources on SMBDOM regardless of their account status
on SMBDOM.

The NET USE command is done like so :
NET USE X: \\SAMBA3\WORK (Keith's Home Dir on SMBDOM).

It asks for the password for this. I have a feeling this is designed
behaviour but I am unsure what to do to PREVENT it asking for the
password. Security on shares isn't really a problem as no-one can
access anothers' home directory or profile directory, only those in
UNIX group 'domadm' which maps to Domain Admins have access to
any profile or home directory. Most other shares on the server are
public, you must be a member of group 'users' or 'staff' to access
them.

If anyone has any ideas or suggestions or can help in any way I'd
be most appreciative.

Thanking you all in advance,

Mr. K. Hawkes

What we do in life echoes in eternity. - Anon
You look back upon choices you've made, you wonder 'what if' and wonder if
you should have done it differently... but then you'd not be you anymore,
you'd be someone else, asking the same set of questions. - Anon


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Re: school PDC questions

2004-02-09 Thread K. Hawkes
 On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:05:23AM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
  Get used to writing and running Net::LDAP perl scripts.  Then it's a
  simple matter of parsing the text dump from your student admin system.
 
  My site is just Samba+LDAP, plus a lot of local scripts.
 
  If generating passwords for your students, the Crypt::SmbHash module is
  very useful.
 
  Andrew Bartlett

 Is LDAP a must in this example? Wouldn't it be just as easy to create
 local accounts?

I can't speak for whether LDAP makes things easier or not, but
it's simple enough with a few perl scripts to create users locally
from a CSV or any other kind of text file. Our school doesn't use
LDAP (although we're looking into it with migration to Samba 3),
and we manage 1,500 users quite effectively, most of the newcomers
(each academic year), being created from a CSV file, given to us by
the admin staff (those who have direct access to the school database and
such).

This works well for us, it may do for you also.

Mr. K. Hawkes
 -- 
 :wq!


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Samba 3 and LDAP

2004-01-12 Thread K. Hawkes
Hey all,

I hope you all had a pleasent holiday season (okay so I'm a week or so
late... I've been in hibernation g).

Now, does anyone out there know where I can get documentation on running
Samba 3 as a PDC using LDAP as a backend - I know I'll get plenty of URLs,
so to narrow things down a little, I'm competant with Samba 2.2.x and have
no clue about LDAP, yet we're looking at going LDAP so we can make our PDC
(and stand-alone servers) all use the same set of passwords (as we operate a
reasonably large site with about 1600 users and 400 PC's). Currently we're
using rsync to sync password files but this isn't an ideal solution as we
need passwords that sync using a central database (so a single password
change ANYWHERE on site takes effect).

So - anyone know of any good websites that detail that kind of setup? I have
a few already and I've configured LDAP (or so I thought) and I can't connect
to it - it keeps saying 'incorrect credentials' - despite my passwords being
set correctly. For those of you on RH9 - when you installed the OpenLDAP
kit, does it use plaintext passwords or encrypted by default?

I guess I'm out of my depth here but I decided to give it a go anyway - any
good suggestions or places to start (assuming that I have a test system I
can install everything from total scratch on)?

Thanking you all in advance,

Mr. K. Hawkes

You look back upon choices you've made, you wonder 'what if' and wonder if
you should have done it differently... but then you'd not be you anymore,
you'd be someone else, asking the same set of questions. - Anon

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com

iQEVAwUBPHjfdSBHjRAjzresAQHZpgf/ZKpt2Nl+8EmIJwT/rLFtx8yhFFKdqVk6
pQGsgeOGN1ZI5kSOU6FBeWkyVS3YKLV6UHhvHVm1MQuBwPyfnjhQGj+OuI9jQPoc
qTFb0TRQivOQoOeJq1PfIFcl53RrvRUOFAl8+jdKqZo/IFARdllknkCMTZirvp5l
M+7/4a/ua2rx8d46zab1RF5YYNHRjyJRXD913FHty5VXCX31DJ55nAho30lOKOPC
TNT+zzO1UC/J+keWSjxSSV3wPeOiOgtUtI5FiuXJmv1IXzsxjogGCTd0HUJ/04mR
H623bEhl8M8yF/x6seCNKpHDkDQjoL+ddlQGVezdgbg3z7Jd7Y6VKA==
=/whC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Apologies for off-topic

2003-10-26 Thread K. Hawkes
I apologise for the fact that this has nothing to do with Samba, but it does
have something to do with *NIX system admin.

Can any of you recommend a good POP3 daemon/server?

I am currently using Sendmail for SMTP and am wanting a POP3 server to work
alongside it.

If of course you know of something that I can install to replace sendmail
AND give me POP3 then that'd be even better.

Target system is Mandrake 9.0.
(I've tried to install Courier and have gotten fed up with all the missing
dependancies it needs - If only there was a way to install software AND
install it's dependancies in one fall swoop...)

Thanking you all in advance for this off-topic question.

Mr. K. Hawkes

May darkness be your only ally, for in the shadows you can hide - Kris
1998-2002
In darkness, there is strength. - Kris 2002
What we do in life echoes in eternity. - Anon
Remember folks, get your victims to scream, they live longer, you laugh
stronger - Anon
If people never notice you when you're around, they're not going to miss
you when you're not - Kris 2003
Since learning C, I've learnt how to swear in 12 other languages, including
Binary and Hex! - Kris 2003

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com

iQEVAwUBPHjfdSBHjRAjzresAQHZpgf/ZKpt2Nl+8EmIJwT/rLFtx8yhFFKdqVk6
pQGsgeOGN1ZI5kSOU6FBeWkyVS3YKLV6UHhvHVm1MQuBwPyfnjhQGj+OuI9jQPoc
qTFb0TRQivOQoOeJq1PfIFcl53RrvRUOFAl8+jdKqZo/IFARdllknkCMTZirvp5l
M+7/4a/ua2rx8d46zab1RF5YYNHRjyJRXD913FHty5VXCX31DJ55nAho30lOKOPC
TNT+zzO1UC/J+keWSjxSSV3wPeOiOgtUtI5FiuXJmv1IXzsxjogGCTd0HUJ/04mR
H623bEhl8M8yF/x6seCNKpHDkDQjoL+ddlQGVezdgbg3z7Jd7Y6VKA==
=/whC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Samba 3.0 Problems

2003-10-03 Thread K. Hawkes
Hey all,

I installed Samba 3.0 RPM onto our RH 9.0 system (a test system), it took me
a long time to configure this one up as I wanted to learn how it does what
it does and why, so when we deploy it as our main PDC (once S3 becomes
final), we can be aware of any issues or bugs ahead of time.

Anyhow, I have come across a few problems with it, whether these are known
issues already or not I am not sure, but I'm letting you on the list know
about them in any event.

1 - I cannot seem to copy ANY files of ANY size from ANY Samba share to any
other location, be that, share to share, share to hard disk etc... it says
the network name is no longer available. If I try to copy again, it does
complete the copy the second time around.
I have not looked at oplocks or anything and have left those settings at
their defaults, the permissions on the share are that ANYONE can write to
it, it doesn't discriminate.
This was confirmed on Win2K-SP3, Win2K-Adv. Server and Win2K3 Server. It has
not been tried from any Windows 98/NT machines.

2 - I have configured poledit so that users in the 'Domain Admins' group are
allowed to access command prompt/regedit etc... the group mapping has been
confirmed as correct as the Admin Desktop has a link that just says 'Admin',
staff has just 'Staff' and users have just 'Users'. This problem spawned
several others, which may or may not be related below.
If I login as staff/user, all restrictions appear to be in place that should
be, if I login as an admin (a user who is member of UNIX group 'domadm'
which is mapped to NT group 'Domain Admins' and 'Administrators') it says it
has the admin start menu and desktop, yet it's restricted down. I have
double and triple checked my policies to make sure that nothing got in there
untoward, but it all looks clean.
The purpose of the 'Domain Admins' policy object (same with Staff and Domain
Users) is so we do not need seperate policy objects and that ALL admins have
the same policies set. (This is primarily to test that group mappings and
such, work how we'd like them to)

3 - Sometimes, when you login, it complains about not being able to create
directory '\\server\username.pds' on the server, now I've done some reading
on this and did fixes that seem to work. But every now and again it seems to
sneak back in, particularly with users who do NOT have their own policy
object and thus, must use a group-mapped policy (such as 'Staff' etc...).

4 - There appears to be a problem when you try to login as root or ANYONE
who is a member of the 'root' group, it says 'a device attached to the
system is not functioning'. I'm not sure whether this is by design or what,
but it's not documented. The NT Admin user 'ntadmin' who is NOT a member of
the 'root' group can login, yet users like 'administrator' who are in 'root'
group (among others) cannot login and get this message.

I regret I can't give you copies of my smb.conf etc... as these are at work
and I'm currently at home. But if this helps, I'm using the 'smbpasswd'
backend, using the Samba 3.0 RPM downloaded from the UK mirrors' service for
RedHat 9.0.

I apologise if this has already been brought up before and I apologise that
I can't give you much more information than is outlined above. If anyone has
any ideas or suggestions, we'd be only too grateful to try anything and get
back to you. (Anything you'd like tried etc... will have to wait until
Monday now I'm afraid)

Apart from my problems though, I'd like to say I'm impressed with the way
Samba 3.0 gets around many of our 'poledit' problems and that we can
possibly actually use an LDAP backend to have a single password server for
the entire site and have distributed PDCs who all have access to a master
list of passwords/usernames/security setups etc... (any thoughts on this?)

Thanking you all in advance,

Mr. K. Hawkes

May darkness be your only ally, for in the shadows you can hide - Kris
1998-2002
In darkness, there is strength. - Kris 2002
What we do in life echoes in eternity. - Anon
Remember folks, get your victims to scream, they live longer, you laugh
stronger - Anon
If people never notice you when you're around, they're not going to miss
you when you're not - Kris 2003

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com

iQEVAwUBPHjfdSBHjRAjzresAQHZpgf/ZKpt2Nl+8EmIJwT/rLFtx8yhFFKdqVk6
pQGsgeOGN1ZI5kSOU6FBeWkyVS3YKLV6UHhvHVm1MQuBwPyfnjhQGj+OuI9jQPoc
qTFb0TRQivOQoOeJq1PfIFcl53RrvRUOFAl8+jdKqZo/IFARdllknkCMTZirvp5l
M+7/4a/ua2rx8d46zab1RF5YYNHRjyJRXD913FHty5VXCX31DJ55nAho30lOKOPC
TNT+zzO1UC/J+keWSjxSSV3wPeOiOgtUtI5FiuXJmv1IXzsxjogGCTd0HUJ/04mR
H623bEhl8M8yF/x6seCNKpHDkDQjoL+ddlQGVezdgbg3z7Jd7Y6VKA==
=/whC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] gpedit.msc as centralized policy for 2k/xp clients

2003-03-16 Thread K. Hawkes
You sound like you are having the same problem we did at our site.

The key is to get Win2K SP3, get the POLEDIT.EXE file out of it.
Search local hard disks for .ADM files, load these into POLEDIT.
This will give you most of GPEDIT's functionality but inside POLEDIT, it may
be an idea to convert the .ADMs to standard TEXT, NOT Unicode just for
completeness.

Hope this helps.

K. Hawkes

- Original Message -
From: Ulrich Kohlhase [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] gpedit.msc as centralized policy for 2k/xp clients


Richard,

 Is it possible to apply these at logon? through/via logon scripts to
 centralize admin? I believe the user side is not applied till login
 anyway? regards, Richard Coates.

LGPOs are applied at logon, at least the user-specific part. The
machine-specific part comes to effect after rebooting the system. As I
understand the GPO stuff usually depends on an AD environment if (more or
less time consuming) LGPO tweaking on each and every non AD local machine is
not an option. In the document you mentioned
http://charon.minilab.bdeb.qc.ca/anonym/nt/2000/ads/TTGW2KGP_Vol1through4.pd
f
The answer to question 6.2 says the scripting possibilities are limited so
logon scripts probably won't work. This GPO stuff is very powerful and
interesting in terms of user and machine restrictions but MUCH more
complicated compared to the NT4 policy scheme (sigh). I don't have time to
investigate any further on this right now, sorry.

After applying LGPOs the users profile folders contain the following files:
--
...
NTUSER.DAT
...
ntuser.dat.LOG
ntuser.ini
ntuser.pol
--

May be it's possible to set up LGPOs on one computer and copy ntuser.pol
(GPO settings) and ntuser.ini (profile Exclusion List) to users profile
folders on other machines? Just guessing and hoping there's a clean and easy
solution ...

The following guide provided by MS may be of interest too:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/planning/management/groupsteps
.asp

Good luck,
Uli

 On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 03:30, Ulrich Kohlhase wrote:
 We use local (!) GPOs on our Win2k clients with great success:
 - log on to master workstation as administrator
 - create a link to the C:\WINNT\system32\GroupPolicy folder on
 your administrator's desktop
 - optionally add gpedit.msc to mmc (add snapin ...)
 - change settings in GPOs to fit your needs or your company's
 security policy (especially admin templates)
 - export and import on other workstations or clone master
 workstation



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Windows 2K/XP Profile/Homedir replication issue?

2003-03-04 Thread K. Hawkes
Hey there,

Just a question for you Samba 2.2.x gurus out there :)

We have a contingent (a steadily increasing contingent) of Win2K and WinXP
workstations.
Does anyone here know how to stop the profiles from replicating?
If we create a file in the profile dir, say \\PDC\UserHome\profile.doc.
It will replicate that to the profile directory, while one file or two files
are not a problem, we use classroom based logins, so they all login at once
and it's transferring the whole \\PDC\UserHome dir around everywhere it
goes, it does it when you login and logout, so if everyone saves work there,
as you can imagine, login/logout times take a long long time.

Anyone got a work-around for this or is it just us who are having this
problem?

Cheers,

Mr. K. Hawkes

May darkness be your only ally, for in the shadows you can hide - Kris
1998-2002
In darkness, there is strength. - Kris 2002
What we do in life echoes in eternity. - Anon

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com

iQEVAwUBPHjfdSBHjRAjzresAQHZpgf/ZKpt2Nl+8EmIJwT/rLFtx8yhFFKdqVk6
pQGsgeOGN1ZI5kSOU6FBeWkyVS3YKLV6UHhvHVm1MQuBwPyfnjhQGj+OuI9jQPoc
qTFb0TRQivOQoOeJq1PfIFcl53RrvRUOFAl8+jdKqZo/IFARdllknkCMTZirvp5l
M+7/4a/ua2rx8d46zab1RF5YYNHRjyJRXD913FHty5VXCX31DJ55nAho30lOKOPC
TNT+zzO1UC/J+keWSjxSSV3wPeOiOgtUtI5FiuXJmv1IXzsxjogGCTd0HUJ/04mR
H623bEhl8M8yF/x6seCNKpHDkDQjoL+ddlQGVezdgbg3z7Jd7Y6VKA==
=/whC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Samba PDC + 2K/XP

2003-01-16 Thread K. Hawkes
Hey,

I am just wondering how you enforce security (such as permissions) on local
workstations while running Samba 2.2.x as a PDC with 2K/XP workstations?  As
some of us don't have or want 2000 Server to enforce things like policies
etc... how do you all do it.  E.g. If we want 'Administrator' to have access
to all start menu etc... yet standard users to have only programs, no
settings access etc.

We are currently using POLEDIT (on an NT Server) and GPEDIT.MSC on the local
workstations, this is, if you have ever used, is not that great for
centralised Administration, nor is it easy to maintain with a Network of
over 300+ workstations, most of which are Win98, however we are starting to
get more Win2K/WinXP clients, so a centralised solution would be great.

I apologise for the fact this is not directly about Samba, but if anyone
could throw me some information or links on solutions for this sort of
management solution, I'd be most grateful.

Thanking you in advance,

Mr. K. Hawkes

ICT Support Technician

May darkness be your only ally, for in the shadows you can hide - Kris
1998-2002
In darkness, there is strength. - Kris 2002
What we do in life echoes in eternity. - Anon

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com

iQEVAwUBPHjfdSBHjRAjzresAQHZpgf/ZKpt2Nl+8EmIJwT/rLFtx8yhFFKdqVk6
pQGsgeOGN1ZI5kSOU6FBeWkyVS3YKLV6UHhvHVm1MQuBwPyfnjhQGj+OuI9jQPoc
qTFb0TRQivOQoOeJq1PfIFcl53RrvRUOFAl8+jdKqZo/IFARdllknkCMTZirvp5l
M+7/4a/ua2rx8d46zab1RF5YYNHRjyJRXD913FHty5VXCX31DJ55nAho30lOKOPC
TNT+zzO1UC/J+keWSjxSSV3wPeOiOgtUtI5FiuXJmv1IXzsxjogGCTd0HUJ/04mR
H623bEhl8M8yF/x6seCNKpHDkDQjoL+ddlQGVezdgbg3z7Jd7Y6VKA==
=/whC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] WinXP Pro, Profiles and Home Dirs

2002-10-07 Thread K. Hawkes

Hey,

I'm sorry if this has been asked before or if a solution is in the archive,
this is rather a semi-urgent request.

We have a PDC (Samba 2.2.5) mostly with Win98 clients, a few XP clients.  We
can join these to the domain thanks to the registry
patch, however, sometimes (it's random, or appears to be), we login a user
who HASN'T previously logged into the XP system before and it deletes their
home directory (as it's set the same as their profile directory).  The only
things left are the profiles and any subdirs that happen to be laying
around.  Any files in the root of the homedir are deleted.  We can't find
why this happens.  Another thing which may or may not be XP+Samba related,
sometimes it renders other samba users inaccessible, as in they cannot
login, whether it's from XP clients or 98 clients.  It's almost like it's
disabled the account, but we re-enable it and it does not fix it.  Only way
to fix is to DELETE the samba account and recreate it.  The XP clients are
NOT SP1, have no patches except the XP domain-login patch.

Any thoughts on above?  Also what is a good setup for XP roaming profiles so
they DO NOT conflict or overwrite Win98 profiles?

As an afterthought, would Samba 2.2.6 correct any of this or is it just us?

Thanking you all in advance,

Mr. K. Hawkes

May darkness be your only ally, for in the shadows you can hide - Kris
1998-2002
In darkness, there is strength. - Kris 2002
What we do in life echoes in eternity. - Anon

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com

iQEVAwUBPHjfdSBHjRAjzresAQHZpgf/ZKpt2Nl+8EmIJwT/rLFtx8yhFFKdqVk6
pQGsgeOGN1ZI5kSOU6FBeWkyVS3YKLV6UHhvHVm1MQuBwPyfnjhQGj+OuI9jQPoc
qTFb0TRQivOQoOeJq1PfIFcl53RrvRUOFAl8+jdKqZo/IFARdllknkCMTZirvp5l
M+7/4a/ua2rx8d46zab1RF5YYNHRjyJRXD913FHty5VXCX31DJ55nAho30lOKOPC
TNT+zzO1UC/J+keWSjxSSV3wPeOiOgtUtI5FiuXJmv1IXzsxjogGCTd0HUJ/04mR
H623bEhl8M8yF/x6seCNKpHDkDQjoL+ddlQGVezdgbg3z7Jd7Y6VKA==
=/whC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] Samba 2.2.3a and Windows XP Pro

2002-04-24 Thread K. Hawkes

We've now got a Windows XP machine we'd like to add to our domain.
Simple enough, I add it to the domain, it says 'Welcome to the TEST Domain'.
I apply the registry patch in the samba 2.2.3a archive and reboot.

When it comes to login, I type in a valid user 'Administrator' in this case
and select the domain of TEST.
It says it can't connect to the server or find the domain or something like
that.

User Administrator works on a Win98SE machine, has an account on the domain
etc.
All IP addresses and Netbios names are setup also.  So I'm wondering what
the problem is.

Should I have put the registry patch FIRST and THEN join to domain?

Any ideas?

Kris

May darkness be your only ally, for in the shadows you can hide - Kris
1998-2002
Happiness is but a dream, an unobtainable dream, quit dreaming. - Kris
2002

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com

iQEVAwUBPHjfdSBHjRAjzresAQHZpgf/ZKpt2Nl+8EmIJwT/rLFtx8yhFFKdqVk6
pQGsgeOGN1ZI5kSOU6FBeWkyVS3YKLV6UHhvHVm1MQuBwPyfnjhQGj+OuI9jQPoc
qTFb0TRQivOQoOeJq1PfIFcl53RrvRUOFAl8+jdKqZo/IFARdllknkCMTZirvp5l
M+7/4a/ua2rx8d46zab1RF5YYNHRjyJRXD913FHty5VXCX31DJ55nAho30lOKOPC
TNT+zzO1UC/J+keWSjxSSV3wPeOiOgtUtI5FiuXJmv1IXzsxjogGCTd0HUJ/04mR
H623bEhl8M8yF/x6seCNKpHDkDQjoL+ddlQGVezdgbg3z7Jd7Y6VKA==
=/whC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free by AVG 6.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 22/03/2002


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] More than 1 Samba Server on 1 workstation?

2002-04-08 Thread K. Hawkes

Hey everyone, I hope your days are going well.

I've got a question which has no doubt been answered before but I feel the
need to ask it anyway.

Where I work we have a spare server which is running Mandrake 7.2, I've been
left to my own devices on this
server by my boss in an effort to help me learn more about how our school's
network works without releasing me
on our live Samba Network.

I managed to configure Samba 2.2.3a and it runs great, I created my own
.conf from scratch using the 'Using Samba'
documentation in SWAT and various other documents.  This may not seem like
much but I've learnt alot from it.

This machine has an IP of 10.16.0.250, on this IP it runs Samba 2.2.3a
SMBD/NMBD and SWAT.
What I was wondering is, can I install Samba 3.0 alpha 17 on the same
machine?
Obviously giving Samba 3.x different paths for it's binaries and such, it's
own config file etc...

I tried to run it's SMBD/NMBD along side the other version, the NMBD ran
fine yet the SMBD failed with
the error of it can't bind to port 139 which is the NETBIOS port.  My boss
was under the impression you could
run 2 SMBD's sharing the port and depending on what you typed in the DOMAIN
box, it would direct the output
to the relevant daemon.  However I've come to believe the Samba 3.x system
would want it's own IP.

The straight up question is, can I run 2 versions of Samba along side each
other?
If I can, how can I accomplish this?
If not, the way I thought of doing it would be to stop the 2.2.3a one
loading on boot, disabling SWAT/SMBD/NMBD
through linuxconf.  Then just load the 'smbd/nmbd/swat' set that I wanted to
look at.

I've looked at 3.x's changelog, it doesn't mean an awful lot to me I must
admit.  Could anyone out there be good enough
to tell me the MAIN differences (in terms of features) that 3.x has over
2.2.3a?  We run Samba 2.0.7 on our main systems,
Mandrake 8.1.  I assume that 2.2.3a has plenty of fixes that make it well
worth upgrading from 2.0.7?

Thanking you all for your time and patience :)

Kris

May darkness be your only ally, for in the shadows you can hide - Kris
1998-2002

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com

iQEVAwUBPHjfdSBHjRAjzresAQHZpgf/ZKpt2Nl+8EmIJwT/rLFtx8yhFFKdqVk6
pQGsgeOGN1ZI5kSOU6FBeWkyVS3YKLV6UHhvHVm1MQuBwPyfnjhQGj+OuI9jQPoc
qTFb0TRQivOQoOeJq1PfIFcl53RrvRUOFAl8+jdKqZo/IFARdllknkCMTZirvp5l
M+7/4a/ua2rx8d46zab1RF5YYNHRjyJRXD913FHty5VXCX31DJ55nAho30lOKOPC
TNT+zzO1UC/J+keWSjxSSV3wPeOiOgtUtI5FiuXJmv1IXzsxjogGCTd0HUJ/04mR
H623bEhl8M8yF/x6seCNKpHDkDQjoL+ddlQGVezdgbg3z7Jd7Y6VKA==
=/whC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free by AVG 6.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 22/03/2002


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba