[Samba] Understanding re-sahring a NFS filesystem in Samba
Greetings, I made some search on Google regarding this matter and found many diverse information, some dated back to 2004, and would like to update and clarify this issue. The question is: what's the problem on re-sharing a NFS filesystem with Samba?. The only way I found to share a NFS mount point on Samba without apparent problem is to disable file locking on NFS mount by using the nolock option on fstab. It seems to work fine, but some say it is a receipt to disaster, while others says it is good to go. As I understand, if a shared NFS filesystem is mounted on two different servers with nolock option, I will probably run in troubles with concurrent file access. FreeNAS --NFS-nolock--Client1 --NFS-nolock--Client2 Similarly, if a shared NFS filesystem, mounted on a second server, is shared by this second server via Samba, I may come accross the same problem due to simultaneous file access without lock, one by the NFS server and other by Samba server. FreeNAS --NFS-nolock-- Server --smbd-- Client If such filesystem is used for write operations only by Samba and no one else, neither the NFS server or other processes on Samba server, would the nolock option on NFS or the re-sharing by Samba be an issue? What are the expected problems one could find in such setup and what cares should be taken to use this and still have a good night sleep? Is there an alternative/preferred setup? Would love to hear your considerations and technical expertise. For reference, here is the respective question I made on FreeNAS forums: http://forums.freenas.org/showthread.php?13037-FreeNAS-NFS-share-mounted-on-Ubuntu-samba-serverp=61416#post61416 Best regards. -- Marcio Merlone -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Understanding re-sahring a NFS filesystem in Samba
Em 04-06-2013 11:05, Emmanuel Florac escreveu: Le Tue, 04 Jun 2013 10:35:33 -0300 Marcio Merlone marcio.merl...@a1.ind.br écrivait: If such filesystem is used for write operations only by Samba and no one else, neither the NFS server or other processes on Samba server, would the nolock option on NFS or the re-sharing by Samba be an issue? One of my customers has been running such a setup where a linux server re-exports an NFS share from another linux box for the past 2 years with about one hundred users. Never had a glitch. The only other accesses to this NFS share are rsync'ing them to another server for backup. Are they using oplocks? -- Marcio Merlone -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] There are no currently logon servers available when mappingwith net use
Anybody else? Any sugestion? Yours truly, Marcio Oliveira 2013/3/18 Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com Hi TMason, Jim and Daniel. I don't know what more to do. Follow the informations to all you help me if possible. 1) .. PDC, BDC and domain member have the same version of linux, but just the domain member has a different version of samba. pdc Linux 2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 (Santiago) Samba: Version 3.5.10-116.el6_2 bdc Linux 2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 (Santiago) Samba: Version 3.5.10-116.el6_2 member of domain Linux 2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64 GNU/Linux Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 (Santiago) Samba: Version 3.5.6-86.el6_1.4 2) .. - About windows registry (client windows7 professional) and gpedit.msc, I altered these ones: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters] DomainCompatibilityMode=dword:0001 DNSNameResolutionRequired=dword: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System] SlowLinkDetectEnabled=dword: DeleteRoamingCache=dword:0001 WaitForNetwork=dword:0050 CompatibleRUPSecurity=dword:0001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System] SlowLinkDetectEnabled=dword: DeleteRoamingCache=dword:0001 WaitForNetwork=dword:0050 CompatibleRUPSecurity=dword:0001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon] SyncForegroundPolicy=dword:0001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Policies\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon] SyncForegroundPolicy=dword:0001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon] SyncForegroundPolicy=dword:0001 [HotKeyLocalMachine\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters] DWORD RequireSignOrSeal = 1 DWORD RequireStrongKey = 1 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System] “RunLogonScriptSync”=dword:0001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters] ExpectedDialupDelay=dword:001e NegativeCachePeriod=dword:00014a78 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\Kerberos\Parameters] MaxPacketSize=dword:0001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters] DisableDHCPMediaSense=dword:0001 3) .. - Dfs and dfs proxy are with default values of samba. 4) .. Yes, I use wins. My wins server is the PDC. 5) .. Look at the authentication of your member server, does the server authenticate right against your PDC/BDC? So, how do I verify this? 6) .. Sometimes, but not always, at user's log of samba appears (on the logon moment): # tail -f log.marcio.oliveira [2013/03/15 19:14:11.779186, 1] smbd/service.c:1070(make_connection_snum) pgt019874 (:::10.0.3.16) connect to service netlogon initially as user marcio.oliveira (uid=0, gid=1001) (pid 10342) [2013/03/15 19:14:13.073811, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:4642(ldapuser2displayentry) sid S-1-5-21-4007841154-2593654838-2170425582-2998 does not belong to our domain [2013/03/15 19:15:06.379204, 1] smbd/service.c:1251(close_cnum) pgt019874 (:::10.0.3.16) closed connection to service netlogon Thanks, Marcio Oliveira 2013/3/18 Daniel Müller muel...@tropenklinik.de Look at the authentication of your member server, does the server authenticate right against your PDC/BDC? Which version of Samba? what about using dfs or dfs proxy on your PDC/BDC to map the share? Do you use WINS? --- EDV Daniel Müller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 72076 Tübingen Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 eMail: muel...@tropenklinik.de Internet: www.tropenklinik.de --- -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Im Auftrag von Jim Potter Gesendet: Sonntag, 17. März 2013 21:33 An: c.koe...@live.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Betreff: Re: [Samba] There are no currently logon servers available when
Re: [Samba] There are no currently logon servers available when mappingwith net use
Hey Achim, I'll try vb scripts afterwards and I'll give you the feedback. Thaks about the good sugestion! Jim, I'll make these tests too on a good moment and I'll give the feedbacks too. As soon as possible I'll give news. Good news I hope. Thanks about the answers for while, Marcio Oliveira. 2013/3/19 Jim Potter jimpot...@orange.net Just a thought - you say its an intermittent problem and you have 2 DCs, right? It isn't just going wrong when it uses one server but not the other to log on is it? Try forcing it to log on to each server individually (eg unplug ethernet on each as you log on for a moment when no-one is using network) I don't like the look of the backslash in your [netlogon] admin users either. Why not just leave the entire line out? Jim On 18 March 2013 17:56, Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi TMason, Jim and Daniel. I don't know what more to do. Follow the informations to all you help me if possible. 1) .. PDC, BDC and domain member have the same version of linux, but just the domain member has a different version of samba. pdc Linux 2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 (Santiago) Samba: Version 3.5.10-116.el6_2 bdc Linux 2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 (Santiago) Samba: Version 3.5.10-116.el6_2 member of domain Linux 2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64 GNU/Linux Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 (Santiago) Samba: Version 3.5.6-86.el6_1.4 2) .. - About windows registry (client windows7 professional) and gpedit.msc, I altered these ones: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters] DomainCompatibilityMode=dword:0001 DNSNameResolutionRequired=dword: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System] SlowLinkDetectEnabled=dword: DeleteRoamingCache=dword:0001 WaitForNetwork=dword:0050 CompatibleRUPSecurity=dword:0001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System] SlowLinkDetectEnabled=dword: DeleteRoamingCache=dword:0001 WaitForNetwork=dword:0050 CompatibleRUPSecurity=dword:0001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon] SyncForegroundPolicy=dword:0001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Policies\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon] SyncForegroundPolicy=dword:0001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon] SyncForegroundPolicy=dword:0001 [HotKeyLocalMachine\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters] DWORD RequireSignOrSeal = 1 DWORD RequireStrongKey = 1 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System] “RunLogonScriptSync”=dword:0001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters] ExpectedDialupDelay=dword:001e NegativeCachePeriod=dword:00014a78 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\Kerberos\Parameters] MaxPacketSize=dword:0001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters] DisableDHCPMediaSense=dword:0001 3) .. - Dfs and dfs proxy are with default values of samba. 4) .. Yes, I use wins. My wins server is the PDC. 5) .. Look at the authentication of your member server, does the server authenticate right against your PDC/BDC? So, how do I verify this? 6) .. Sometimes, but not always, at user's log of samba appears (on the logon moment): # tail -f log.marcio.oliveira [2013/03/15 19:14:11.779186, 1] smbd/service.c:1070(make_connection_snum) pgt019874 (:::10.0.3.16) connect to service netlogon initially as user marcio.oliveira (uid=0, gid=1001) (pid 10342) [2013/03/15 19:14:13.073811, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:4642(ldapuser2displayentry) sid S-1-5-21-4007841154-2593654838-2170425582-2998 does not belong to our domain [2013/03/15 19:15:06.379204, 1] smbd/service.c:1251(close_cnum) pgt019874 (:::10.0.3.16) closed connection to service netlogon Thanks, Marcio Oliveira 2013/3/18 Daniel Müller muel...@tropenklinik.de Look at the authentication of your member server, does the server authenticate right against
Re: [Samba] There are no currently logon servers available when mappingwith net use
Hi TMason, Jim and Daniel. I don't know what more to do. Follow the informations to all you help me if possible. 1) .. PDC, BDC and domain member have the same version of linux, but just the domain member has a different version of samba. pdc Linux 2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 (Santiago) Samba: Version 3.5.10-116.el6_2 bdc Linux 2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 (Santiago) Samba: Version 3.5.10-116.el6_2 member of domain Linux 2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64 GNU/Linux Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 (Santiago) Samba: Version 3.5.6-86.el6_1.4 2) .. - About windows registry (client windows7 professional) and gpedit.msc, I altered these ones: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters] DomainCompatibilityMode=dword:0001 DNSNameResolutionRequired=dword: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System] SlowLinkDetectEnabled=dword: DeleteRoamingCache=dword:0001 WaitForNetwork=dword:0050 CompatibleRUPSecurity=dword:0001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System] SlowLinkDetectEnabled=dword: DeleteRoamingCache=dword:0001 WaitForNetwork=dword:0050 CompatibleRUPSecurity=dword:0001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon] SyncForegroundPolicy=dword:0001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Policies\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon] SyncForegroundPolicy=dword:0001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon] SyncForegroundPolicy=dword:0001 [HotKeyLocalMachine\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters] DWORD RequireSignOrSeal = 1 DWORD RequireStrongKey = 1 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System] “RunLogonScriptSync”=dword:0001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters] ExpectedDialupDelay=dword:001e NegativeCachePeriod=dword:00014a78 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\Kerberos\Parameters] MaxPacketSize=dword:0001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters] DisableDHCPMediaSense=dword:0001 3) .. - Dfs and dfs proxy are with default values of samba. 4) .. Yes, I use wins. My wins server is the PDC. 5) .. Look at the authentication of your member server, does the server authenticate right against your PDC/BDC? So, how do I verify this? 6) .. Sometimes, but not always, at user's log of samba appears (on the logon moment): # tail -f log.marcio.oliveira [2013/03/15 19:14:11.779186, 1] smbd/service.c:1070(make_connection_snum) pgt019874 (:::10.0.3.16) connect to service netlogon initially as user marcio.oliveira (uid=0, gid=1001) (pid 10342) [2013/03/15 19:14:13.073811, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:4642(ldapuser2displayentry) sid S-1-5-21-4007841154-2593654838-2170425582-2998 does not belong to our domain [2013/03/15 19:15:06.379204, 1] smbd/service.c:1251(close_cnum) pgt019874 (:::10.0.3.16) closed connection to service netlogon Thanks, Marcio Oliveira 2013/3/18 Daniel Müller muel...@tropenklinik.de Look at the authentication of your member server, does the server authenticate right against your PDC/BDC? Which version of Samba? what about using dfs or dfs proxy on your PDC/BDC to map the share? Do you use WINS? --- EDV Daniel Müller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 72076 Tübingen Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 eMail: muel...@tropenklinik.de Internet: www.tropenklinik.de --- -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Im Auftrag von Jim Potter Gesendet: Sonntag, 17. März 2013 21:33 An: c.koe...@live.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Betreff: Re: [Samba] There are no currently logon servers available when mappingwith net use Hi, There is a setting in gpedit.msc somewhere to tell the PC to wait for network connectivity before showing the login box. (no idea where - find it yourself - sorry) Anothe option
Re: [Samba] There are no currently logon servers available when mappingwith net use
Hi TMason, thanks about the quickly answer. All my servers are over red hat (I'll confirm correct version next monday) with static IP addresses. And the network has DHCP and DNS over red hat too. DHCP sends the wins server; that in this case is the PDC; to all users' workstations. I'm available to give more informations about my environment in order to we solve this issue. Thanks, Marcio. 2013/3/15 TMason c.koe...@live.com Marcio Oli wrote in message news:CANpJy9WD=CLxbB=BQhgS==** 1mt-rkTXT0hVMi6muymZ5RKXMktg@**mail.gmail.com... Hi people, I have a problem and I need so much of your help. I have a login script in \\server1\netlogon\script.bat (on my PDC and BDC) that runs net use commands to map some shares in time of the logon. This login tries to map share in another server (samba member of domain \\server2). So, I put the result at a log and appears these lines: System error 1311 has occurred. There are currently no logon servers available to service the logon request. This is a recurrent problem, but neither always this happens. Sometimes, everything is wonderful and works very well mapping all shares, but is unstable. --**--** Windows clients have this problem regardless of the type of PDC/BDC you have (Windows or Samba). The problem is that Windows is generally ready to let people log in before all of the network services are ready and as such people can't log in. Are your servers on static IPs? Also, what kind of DNS/DHCP server do you have? This will help in troubleshooting. TMason -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/**mailman/options/sambahttps://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] There are no currently logon servers available when mapping with net use
,/etc,/lib,/lost+found,/initrd # Habilitar Auditoria: vfs objects = full_audit #full_audit:success = open, opendir, write, unlink, rename, mkdir, rmdir, chmod, chown full_audit:success = open, write, unlink, rename, mkdir, rmdir, chmod, chown full_audit:prefix = %u|%I|%S full_audit:failure = none full_audit:facility = local5 full_audit:priority = notice [netlogon] path = /home/netlogon/ browseable = No writeable = No admin users = @MyDomain\netlogon My member of domain server2's smb.conf: [global] workgroup = MyDomain server string = Servidor de Arquivos - Sede 2 security = DOMAIN obey pam restrictions = Yes log level = 1 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%U max log size = 2 printcap name = cups os level = 20 domain logons = no preferred master = no domain master = No local master = No wins support = no wins server = 10.0.0.224 registry shares = Yes idmap uid = 1000-2 idmap gid = 1000-2 template homedir = /home/%U template shell = /bin/bash winbind enum users = Yes winbind enum groups = Yes winbind use default domain = Yes # Habilitar Auditoria: vfs objects = full_audit, recycle #full_audit:success = open, opendir, write, unlink, rename, mkdir, rmdir, chmod, chown full_audit:success = open, write, unlink, rename, mkdir, rmdir, chmod, chown full_audit:prefix = %u|%I|%S full_audit:failure = none full_audit:facility = local5 full_audit:priority = notice #Lixeira de Rede recycle:facility = LOCAL1 recycle:priority = NOTICE recycle:maxsize = 104857600 recycle:minsize = 256 recycle:repository = .$networkRecycle/%U recycle:directory_mode = 0777 recycle:subdir_mode = 0777 recycle:keeptree = True recycle:touch = True recycle:touch_mtime = True recycle:versions = True recycle:noversions = *.pdf, *.jpg, *.gif, *.iso, *.jpeg, *.db, *.avi, *.bin, *.exe, *.mp3, *.mpg, *.wma, *.png, *.vob, *.wav, *.psd, *.psdx, *.nef, *.tif, *.vob, *.wmv, *.dwg, *.indd, *.cdr, *.eps recycle:exclude = *.tmp, *.temp, *.log, *.ldb, *.o, *.obj, *.bak, *.iso, *.vmdk recycle:exclude_dir = tmp, temp, cache # all shares listed/configured at bottom of .conf file ... Anybody could help me please? I'm with many clients complaining about the service. I'm hopeful about answers. Thanks a lot, -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] ower and group at linux
Ok TAKAHASHI! Thank you. The question was exactly this. Marcio Oliveira 2012/12/8 TAKAHASHI Motonobu mo...@monyo.com From: Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 18:04:29 -0200 When I list a directory within the linux OS, appears like this: ... -rwxr--r--. 1 root pgt.cxt 7,2K Nov 25 14:33 New Text OpenDocument.odt ... (snip) But when a user access the share, by windows7 side, and he creates a file, doesn't appears the username owner of the file, instead of this, always appears root how the owner. How can I, solve this issue? Because of the setting: [global] ... admin users = @PGT\pgt.cxt This setting always set the accessing user root. --- TAKAHASHI Motonobu mo...@monyo.com -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] ower and group at linux
When I list a directory within the linux OS, appears like this: ... -rwxr--r--. 1 root pgt.cxt 7,2K Nov 25 14:33 New Text OpenDocument.odt ... At smb.conf is of this way: [global] workgroup = PGT server string = Descricao security = DOMAIN obey pam restrictions = Yes ... registry shares = Yes idmap uid = 1000-2 idmap gid = 1000-2 template homedir = /home/%U template shell = /bin/bash winbind enum users = Yes winbind enum groups = Yes winbind use default domain = Yes ... [pgt.cxt] comment = Descricao path = /home/shares/pgt.cxt valid users = @PGT\pgt.cxt write list = @PGT\pgt.cxt read list = @PGT\pgt.cxt admin users = @PGT\pgt.cxt force group = @PGT\pgt.cxt read only = No ... But when a user access the share, by windows7 side, and he creates a file, doesn't appears the username owner of the file, instead of this, always appears root how the owner. How can I, solve this issue? I would like that does not appears the root how the owner, but the user that are accessing and creating the file at the share. Thanks, -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Printers management
Hi people, I have a server where all shares are at a same level. I would like to put the printers within a subfolder with any name. Could anybody help me? Thanks, -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Printers management
The question is how to put all my printers within a share. Because of the current configuration, all printers are appearing at \\server-name\ (the first level of shares). I'd like to make something like: \\server-name\CompanyPrinters\ , so below this directory all printers should be located. Anybody? Thanks again, Marcio. 2012/11/27 Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com Hi people, I have a server where all shares are at a same level. I would like to put the printers within a subfolder with any name. Could anybody help me? Thanks, -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Wait For Network - Win registry
Hi people, I'd like to know about registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System\WaitForNetwork. The question is simple, but I didn't get to find the answer; so, the time to be specified, per default, is in minutes or in secounds? Thanks a lot, -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Wait For Network - Win registry
Ok I already found the answer. The time is in seconds and the maximum time to wait is 300s. Thanks. Marcio Oliveira. 2012/11/22 Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com Hi people, I'd like to know about registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System\WaitForNetwork. The question is simple, but I didn't get to find the answer; so, the time to be specified, per default, is in minutes or in secounds? Thanks a lot, -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Disabling Roaming Profile Support
Hi Jeff, my configs. are like yours. The default value of parameter logon drive is logon drive =, so testparm is correct, because the output is showed only if different of default values. Thanks, Marcio Oliveira. 2012/10/31 Jeff Dickens j...@seamanpaper.com I have logon drive = in smb.conf but testparm does not report that. Does it on your system, Marcio? ex: root@grackle:~# grep logon /etc/samba/smb.conf domain logons = yes logon drive = logon home = logon path = [netlogon] path = /home/samba/netlogon root@grackle:~# root@grackle:~# testparm | grep logon Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf ...snip... Loaded services file OK. Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions logon path = logon home = domain logons = Yes [netlogon] path = /home/samba/netlogon root@grackle:~# On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Jeff Dickens j...@seamanpaper.com wrote: From http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/ProfileMgmt.html : Disabling Roaming Profile Support The question often asked is, “How may I enforce use of local profiles?” or “How do I disable roaming profiles?” There are three ways of doing this: In smb.conf Affect the following settings and ALL clients will be forced to use a local profile: logon home = http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/smb.conf.5.html#LOGONHOMEand logon path = http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/smb.conf.5.html#LOGONPATH The arguments to these parameters must be left blank. It is necessary to include the = sign to specifically assign the empty value. This apparently no longer works, or at least it doesn't work properly with an LDAP server. Can anyone comment on why? I'm running Samba 3.6.3-2 on Ubuntu 12.04. -- * Jeff Dickens* IT Manager 978-632-1513 -- * Jeff Dickens* IT Manager 978-632-1513 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Disabling Roaming Profile Support
In my case, I'm using: logon path = logon home = logon drive = It is working ok, in other words, with local profiles only. Test the configurations with testparm command to see the output of the smb.conf file. Regards, Marcio Oliveira. 2012/10/30 Jeff Dickens j...@seamanpaper.com From http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/ProfileMgmt.html : Disabling Roaming Profile Support The question often asked is, “How may I enforce use of local profiles?” or “How do I disable roaming profiles?” There are three ways of doing this: In smb.conf Affect the following settings and ALL clients will be forced to use a local profile: logon home = http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/smb.conf.5.html#LOGONHOME and logon path = http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/smb.conf.5.html#LOGONPATH The arguments to these parameters must be left blank. It is necessary to include the = sign to specifically assign the empty value. This apparently no longer works, or at least it doesn't work properly with an LDAP server. Can anyone comment on why? I'm running Samba 3.6.3-2 on Ubuntu 12.04. -- * Jeff Dickens* IT Manager 978-632-1513 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Fwd: Bloqueio de login devido ao horário de verão
Oi Natália, como vc efetuou essas configurações no samba? Eu fiquei curioso para saber como criar esse tipo de restrição! Att., Marcio Oliveira. -- Hi Natália, how did you make this configurations on samba? I were curious to know how to create this kind of restriction! Graciously, Marcio Oliveira. Em 29 de outubro de 2012 14:38, Natália Vaz silva@gmail.com escreveu: Boa tarde pessoal. Ninguém teve este problema ou sabe o que possa ser? -- Mensagem encaminhada -- De: Natália Vaz silva@gmail.com Data: 25 de outubro de 2012 16:53 Assunto: Re: [Samba] Bloqueio de login devido ao horário de verão Para: rodrigo tavares rodrigofar...@yahoo.com.br sim, ldap com samba Em 25 de outubro de 2012 16:52, rodrigo tavares rodrigofar...@yahoo.com.brescreveu: Usa LDAP ? -- *De:* Natália Vaz silva@gmail.com *Para:* samba samba@lists.samba.org *Enviadas:* Quinta-feira, 25 de Outubro de 2012 16:39 *Assunto:* [Samba] Bloqueio de login devido ao horário de verão Boa tarde pessoal. Estou com um problema na rede devido a alteração do horário de verão. As liberações e bloqueios de horário funcionavam corretamente até o último fim de semana, como os relógios foram adiantados em um hora, o sistema só está permitindo login uma hora depois do tempo liberado. Por exemplo, todos os usuário podem efetuar logon na rede após as 7am (isso é o que está definido), mas o samba só libera o login a partir das 8am. O horário das estações de trabalho está sincronizado com o do servidor. A mensagem retornada no log é: [2012/10/25 07:56:57.013090, 1] auth/check_samsec.c:159(logon_hours_ok) logon_hours_ok: Account for user *not allowed to logon at this time (Thu Oct 25 07:56:57 2012 ). Alguém tem idéia do que pode ser feito? -- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- Natália Vaz Silva Administradora de redes -- Natália Vaz Silva Administradora de redes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] PDC and BDCs : net rpc testjoin
Thanks Gémes! I'sorry about my ignorance, but what is a aka classic domain? My samba version is 3.5.10-116.el6_2. OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 / Linux 2.6.32-131.6.1.el6.x86_64 Best regards, Marcio Oliveira. 2012/10/23 Gémes Géza g...@kzsdabas.hu 2012-10-22 20:10 keltezéssel, Marcio Oli írta: I think the question is simple, so anybody could help me with this? The questions are: 1. The samba PDCs and BDCs have obligation to be joined to domain? In a samba3 (aka classic domain not) 2. The net rpc testjoin command must to return OK in this case? IF joined yes Thanks, Marcio Oliveira 2012/10/19 Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com People, I have one PDC and a BDC on the matrix side and two BDCs on the branch office. I don't know if it is a problem. Anybody could help me? PDC # net rpc testjoin get_schannel_session_key: could not fetch trust account password for domain 'DOMAIN_NAME' net_rpc_join_ok: failed to get schannel session key from server PDC for domain DOMAIN_NAME. Error was NT_STATUS_CANT_ACCESS_DOMAIN_**INFO Join to domain 'DOMAIN_NAME' is not valid: NT_STATUS_CANT_ACCESS_DOMAIN_**INFO BDCs # net rpc testjoin net_rpc_join_ok: failed to get schannel session key from server PDC for domain DOMAIN_NAME. Error was NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED Join to domain 'DOMAIN_NAME' is not valid: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED What should I do to solve these problems? Thanks, -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/**mailman/options/sambahttps://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] PDC and BDCs : net rpc testjoin
I think the question is simple, so anybody could help me with this? The questions are: 1. The samba PDCs and BDCs have obligation to be joined to domain? 2. The net rpc testjoin command must to return OK in this case? Thanks, Marcio Oliveira 2012/10/19 Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com People, I have one PDC and a BDC on the matrix side and two BDCs on the branch office. I don't know if it is a problem. Anybody could help me? PDC # net rpc testjoin get_schannel_session_key: could not fetch trust account password for domain 'DOMAIN_NAME' net_rpc_join_ok: failed to get schannel session key from server PDC for domain DOMAIN_NAME. Error was NT_STATUS_CANT_ACCESS_DOMAIN_INFO Join to domain 'DOMAIN_NAME' is not valid: NT_STATUS_CANT_ACCESS_DOMAIN_INFO BDCs # net rpc testjoin net_rpc_join_ok: failed to get schannel session key from server PDC for domain DOMAIN_NAME. Error was NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED Join to domain 'DOMAIN_NAME' is not valid: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED What should I do to solve these problems? Thanks, -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba not locking files
I'm sorry Marko, I don't know. I gave that suggestion, because, in my case, almost everything is default in my smb.conf and it's working ok. 2012/10/19 Marko R markor...@yahoo.com HI Marcio, The only reason why I added those is because I was never getting information that file is in use. Could it be some sort of bug? Thank you for your help. -- *From:* Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com *To:* samba@lists.samba.org *Sent:* Thursday, October 18, 2012 5:02 PM *Subject:* Re: [Samba] Samba not locking files I don't know, but you could try to change the parameters strict locking and locking to the default values or just remove them from smb.conf. I think that these actions can solve the problem. After, tell us a feedback! Thanks, Marcio. 2012/10/18 Marko R markor...@yahoo.com Hello, I created the following samba share but for some reason samba is not locking the files open by other users. For example user dave open a file in the share and user slav does not get the notification that opened file is already being used by another user. I even added the locking options to the global but no luck. [share] comment = Main share path = /share guest ok = no writable = yes create mask = 0775 directory mask = 0755 browsable = yes write list = dave slav force group = users oplocks = yes level2 oplocks = yes strict locking = yes locking = yes System I am using is Ubuntu 12.04 LTS 64bit Server. Thanks for any help or advise. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] PDC and BDCs : net rpc testjoin
People, I have one PDC and a BDC on the matrix side and two BDCs on the branch office. I don't know if it is a problem. Anybody could help me? PDC # net rpc testjoin get_schannel_session_key: could not fetch trust account password for domain 'DOMAIN_NAME' net_rpc_join_ok: failed to get schannel session key from server PDC for domain DOMAIN_NAME. Error was NT_STATUS_CANT_ACCESS_DOMAIN_INFO Join to domain 'DOMAIN_NAME' is not valid: NT_STATUS_CANT_ACCESS_DOMAIN_INFO BDCs # net rpc testjoin net_rpc_join_ok: failed to get schannel session key from server PDC for domain DOMAIN_NAME. Error was NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED Join to domain 'DOMAIN_NAME' is not valid: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED What should I do to solve these problems? Thanks, -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba not locking files
I don't know, but you could try to change the parameters strict locking and locking to the default values or just remove them from smb.conf. I think that these actions can solve the problem. After, tell us a feedback! Thanks, Marcio. 2012/10/18 Marko R markor...@yahoo.com Hello, I created the following samba share but for some reason samba is not locking the files open by other users. For example user dave open a file in the share and user slav does not get the notification that opened file is already being used by another user. I even added the locking options to the global but no luck. [share] comment = Main share path = /share guest ok = no writable = yes create mask = 0775 directory mask = 0755 browsable = yes write list = dave slav force group = users oplocks = yes level2 oplocks = yes strict locking = yes locking = yes System I am using is Ubuntu 12.04 LTS 64bit Server. Thanks for any help or advise. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Verifying Samba enviroment
People I'm new in Samba and I'm trying to learn with manuals, sites etc.. So, I'd like to know how can I test my enviroment. In other words, I'd like to know if my DCs are working correctly. I'm working in a new company and now I'm the sponsor about domain. The structure is two sites (matrix office and branch office). At the matrix we have one PDC and one BDC. At the branch we have 2 BDCs. What are the ways that can I verify if is everything working ok? Are there any commands important to test this enviroment? How to know about machines and users that are using the samba DCs? Note: the enviroment is already in production. Thanks, -- Marcio Oliveira. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] log tdb
This log is repeatedly appearing: [2012/10/10 18:42:47.088584, 1] lib/util_tdb.c:385(tdb_log) tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (64768,921067) is already open in this process Anybody knows if it's true tha it's harmless? Thanks, -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) 2012/10/10 Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com This log is repeatedly appearing: [2012/10/10 18:42:47.088584, 1] lib/util_tdb.c:385(tdb_log) tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (64768,921067) is already open in this process Anybody knows if it's true tha it's harmless? Thanks, -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] List windows clients/machines in network list (win 7)
Another important information is that I already allowed the windows firewall rules (network discovery rules). Anybody already passed by these situations? Thanks, Marcio Oliveira. 2012/10/10 Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com People, some of the machines of my network aren't been listed in (Windows Explorer - Network icon). I made a research and I found the following: - try to activate some services: SSDP Discovery; UPnP Device Host; Function Discovery Resource Publication. Note: this situation happens with machines that were joined to the domain and with others that weren't added to domain yet. I would like to see every windows clients listed in Network icon. I activated these services, but it keeps not working. I think my samba DCs are OK, less the following log message, that I'm not sure if it's normal: 1. [2012/10/10 14:40:52.257211, 0] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:281(dump_workgroups) 2. dump_workgroups() 3. dump workgroup on subnet 10.0.5.5: netmask= 255.255.248.0: 4.WORKGROUP(2) current master browser = UNKNOWN 5.NetworkDomain (1) current master browser = PDC 1 6.PDC1 40849b3b (PDC 1 ) 7.BDC1 40809b3b (BDC 1 ) ... 8. [2012/10/10 14:40:52.257344, 0] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:281(dump_workgroups) 9.dump_workgroups() 10. dump workgroup on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: netmask= 10.0.5.5: 11.NetworkDomain (1) current master browser = UNKNOWN 12.PDC1 40819b3b (PDC 1 ) Maybe there is a problem between lines 5 and 11 at above lines. But I don't understand the syntax of this log. Is my network without a current master browser? Anybody could help me with these 2 troubles? Thanks, -- Marcio Oliveira. -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Name Resolve Order : parameter of smb.conf with testparm
Ok Matthieu, Bug reported: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9282 Thanks, Marcio. 2012/10/9 Matthieu Patou m...@matws.net Feel free to file a bug report related to the doc. It's the best way to get it fixed Matthieu. Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com wrote: Ok Matthieu, thanks again about your answer. The suggestion is to modify and correct this question on the URL: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/manpages-3/smb.conf.5.html#NAMERESOLVEORDER Thanks, Marcio. 2012/10/9 Matthieu Patou m...@samba.org On 10/08/2012 02:38 PM, Marcio Oli wrote: Hi Matthieu Patou, the version that I'm using is Samba 3.5.10-116.el6_2. It was installed with rpm command. The OS is: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 (Santiago) Linux [name of host] 2.6.32-131.6.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 20 14:15:38 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I suppose that you are using the version of redhat but I think that you should trust the output of testparm because it use the same code base as daemons for parsing and deducting default values. Also testparm by default won't show the values that are by default as lmhosts wins host bcast is the default it's not shown, use testparm -v to have the full list. Matthieu. -- Matthieu Patou Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/**mailman/options/samba https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] List windows clients/machines in network list (win 7)
People, some of the machines of my network aren't been listed in (Windows Explorer - Network icon). I made a research and I found the following: - try to activate some services: SSDP Discovery; UPnP Device Host; Function Discovery Resource Publication. Note: this situation happens with machines that were joined to the domain and with others that weren't added to domain yet. I would like to see every windows clients listed in Network icon. I activated these services, but it keeps not working. I think my samba DCs are OK, less the following log message, that I'm not sure if it's normal: 1. [2012/10/10 14:40:52.257211, 0] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:281(dump_workgroups) 2. dump_workgroups() 3. dump workgroup on subnet 10.0.5.5: netmask= 255.255.248.0: 4.WORKGROUP(2) current master browser = UNKNOWN 5.NetworkDomain (1) current master browser = PDC 1 6.PDC1 40849b3b (PDC 1 ) 7.BDC1 40809b3b (BDC 1 ) ... 8. [2012/10/10 14:40:52.257344, 0] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:281(dump_workgroups) 9.dump_workgroups() 10. dump workgroup on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: netmask= 10.0.5.5: 11.NetworkDomain (1) current master browser = UNKNOWN 12.PDC-SEDE1 40819b3b (PDC 1 ) Maybe there is a problem between lines 5 and 11 at above lines. But I don't understand the syntax of this log. Is my network without a current master browser? Anybody could help me with these 2 troubles? Thanks, -- Marcio Oliveira. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] log tdb
This log is repeatedly appearing: [2012/10/10 18:42:47.088584, 1] lib/util_tdb.c:385(tdb_log) tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (64768,921067) is already open in this process Anybody knows if it's true tha it's harmless? Thanks, -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Name Resolve Order : parameter of smb.conf with testparm
Ok Matthieu, thanks again about your answer. The suggestion is to modify and correct this question on the URL: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/manpages-3/smb.conf.5.html#NAMERESOLVEORDER Thanks, Marcio. 2012/10/9 Matthieu Patou m...@samba.org On 10/08/2012 02:38 PM, Marcio Oli wrote: Hi Matthieu Patou, the version that I'm using is Samba 3.5.10-116.el6_2. It was installed with rpm command. The OS is: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 (Santiago) Linux [name of host] 2.6.32-131.6.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 20 14:15:38 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I suppose that you are using the version of redhat but I think that you should trust the output of testparm because it use the same code base as daemons for parsing and deducting default values. Also testparm by default won't show the values that are by default as lmhosts wins host bcast is the default it's not shown, use testparm -v to have the full list. Matthieu. -- Matthieu Patou Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/**mailman/options/sambahttps://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba ports
Anybody could help me with this entries in my machines logs: [2012/10/09 14:59:33.092831, 0] lib/util_sock.c:474(read_fd_with_timeout) [2012/10/09 14:59:33.093013, 0] lib/util_sock.c:1441(get_peer_addr_internal) getpeername failed. Error was Ponto final de transporte não está conectado (some logs in portuguese, so the translation is so so: Error was transport endpoint is not connected) read_fd_with_timeout: client 0.0.0.0 read error = Conexão fechada pela outra ponta.( ...: connection closed by other peer) Why this appears frequently? I had already heard that this is a problem with a connection about the windows clients. Is this true? In my smb.conf: smb ports = 139 445 Thanks, -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Name Resolve Order : parameter of smb.conf with testparm
Hi Matthieu Patou, the version that I'm using is Samba 3.5.10-116.el6_2. It was installed with rpm command. The OS is: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 (Santiago) Linux [name of host] 2.6.32-131.6.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 20 14:15:38 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Thanks, -- Marcio Oliveira Técnico de Informática Procuradoria Geral do Trabalho -- Marcio Oliveira. Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Name Resolve Order : parameter of smb.conf with testparm
Hi Matthieu Patou, the version that I'm using is Samba 3.5.10-116.el6_2. It was installed with rpm command. The OS is: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 (Santiago) Linux [name of host] 2.6.32-131.6.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 20 14:15:38 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Thanks, -- Marcio Oliveira Técnico de Informática +55 (61) 3314-8733 Procuradoria Geral do Trabalho -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Name Resolve Order : parameter of smb.conf with testparm
I am writing this letter and I hope that I'll have answers about the generation of smb.conf by the way of smb.conf.master with testparm command. Like is described on page 5 of Samba3-HOWTO.pdf. The situation is: - The manual of smb.conf says that the default value of the parameter “name resolve order” is “lmhosts host wins bcast”, but when I type the command like: # testparm -s smb.conf.master smb.conf the following occurs: the smb.conf generated by this command don't have the parameter “name resolve order” expressed, but in my smb.conf.master is configured like: … name resolve order = lmhosts wins host bcast ... At this situation, I think should appear the parameter because it is not a default value. The order is different of default in smb.conf.master. Thus, I would like to know if the documentation of samba is incorrect about this configuration or testparm is with a problem to create the smb.conf. Yours Truly, Marcio Oliveira Técnico de Informática +55 (61) 3314-8520 Procuradoria Geral do Trabalho -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Making Happy Users ... I need to understand...
Em 07-08-2012 19:08, Marco Ciampa escreveu: Why I have to do this? If I have disabled browing profiles (am I right in disabling this option?) why I should exclude some dirs from the browsing profiles if they do not actually have any chance to be replicated? The profiles share is important to have romaing profiles, i.e. user profiles get saved on the server when the user logoff the workstation, so it can be loaded on another machine, if the user changes workstation. This is the source of slow-down login/logoff: the profile must be transfered from and to the server. If you disable this, obviously you loose also the feature. Disable if you don't need it. This share is not meant for the admin to fool around user's files, but to provide a feature. Folder redirection is a mean to off-load this data transit between server x workstation, pointing potentially 'fat' folders outside the user profile, so they don't get touched on login/logout. Meaningless if you disable profiles share. Regards. -- *Marcio Merlone* -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] rsync folder permissions
Em 22-07-2012 05:13, steve escreveu: I'm trying to rsync our filserver to a USB backup. When I first start, all the folders are created with root:root ownership whereas the actual owners are root:Domain Users or root: one.of.our.groups Eventually, the groups show correctly, but not always. My question is, when rsync creates the new directories, does it respect user and group all the way along or must we wait for the end of the rsync to find out? Issue the command 'man rsync' and take a look what the -a switch does. It acts as if many other switches were issued. Take a look at each, specially -p. Good luck. -- *Marcio Merlone* -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] current maturity Samba 4
Em 08-08-2011 09:16, Dave Thurston escreveu: I have been using Samba 4 (alpha 13) for a year now. No major issues. Using it for AD for Mail and file share authentication. A friend just started using the latest alpha for Mail authentication. Granted we are small companies (250 and 50 users respectively). Are you using the so-called Franky? Do you have to use something else to create the network shares or just pure Samba4? -- *Marcio Merlone* -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] On Samba4
Em 07-06-2011 06:04, titantopp...@gmail.com escreveu: I'm running Samba4 alpha 12 as the only DC and file server on my local network. Pure Samba4 or the Franky (3 + 4) thing? It is working well. After the initial setup, everything can be managed from a Windows workstation. Functions I've tried so far: - Group policy objects - Adding / removing users - Roaming profiles - DNS updates Essentially the main functions you would expect from a Win 2k3 server will be there. It's been almost 10 months since I installed it, and it's been smooth sailing so far. On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Mauricio Tavaresraubvo...@gmail.comwrote: I keep hearing Samba 4 is not ready to be used. Can anyone elaborate on its current status? -- *Marcio Merlone* -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Default Profile for Windows 7
Hi all, I have just deployed a samba 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.2 so I can support Windows 7 on my network. I have a ProfileSambaDefault folder on my netlogon share with a pre-made profile for windows XP. So, I just guessed and tried a ProfileSambaDefault.V2 folder but no luck. How is it made for Windows 7? I searched on google but could not find anything useful. Thanks in advance and best regards. -- *Marcio Merlone* -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Moving away from samba 3.0.28
Hi all, We use samba 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.8 (Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS) as our company's DC and fileserver with LDAP authentication against an OpenLDAP 2.4.9-0ubuntu0.8.04.3. We are having some trouble regarding filesystem permissions and ACL administration, so we plan to move on to a newer version of samba. We'd love to move to an AD solution, but it seems samba4 is not yet ready for production (is franky - samba3/4?). Easy of administration is a plus here, so if I could avoid compiling from scratch would be nice, though it can be done. That means I'd preferer a pre-compiled .deb package I could install, but if it is not feasable I can use the sources and compile it myself. My question is, what samba version you guys recommend for a small company with simple needs - just single-domained DC or AD and fileserver auth'ing on LDAP, no need for print support? Samba 3.3, 3.4 or franky 3/4? Can I use franky and have a good night sleep? Thanks for sharing your experience, tips and thoughts. -- Marcio Merlone -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Problem after upgrade to 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.8
Hi all, I have just upgraded my Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS to samba 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.8. Now I cannot run some apps (installed on network mapped drives) I used to be able to run. My user is a domain admin. I don't even know how to start debugging this problem. It happens with only some users but not all, regardless of group membership or file permissions. Translating from portuguese, the error means Windows cannot access the device, path or file specified. Maybe you don't have rights to access the item. But I can copy, move, delete, write, etc with no problem. Just can't run it. Can any kind soul please help me? This is urgent, sorry. -- Marcio Merlone -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Deploying apps via policy
Mister Olli escreveu: No just use Samba4, it brings server side GPO support. If you miss some config options from samba3 you really need, you can try compile samba with --enable-merged-build to enable building samba3 +samba4. - samba3 then takes care of file sharing stuff - samba4 handles the AD stuff. see http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Franky. At this point of samba4 devel, is it possible to run a small network without the Frank stuff, i.e. a pure samba4 setup without samba3? I just need an AD, file sharing and a couple of Windows server members, no printers, no nothing fancy. Best regards. -- Marcio Merlone -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] vfs_recycle directory_mode and recycle docs
Hello all, I have a share with the following conf: vfs objects = recycle mode = KEEP_DIRECTORIES|VERSIONS|TOUCH # config-file = /etc/samba/recycle.conf recycle:exclude = *.tmp|*.temp|*.o|*.obj|~$*|*.~??|*.log|*.trace|*.mp3|*.MP3|*.wma|*.WMA recycle:excludedir = /tmp|/temp|/cache recycle:directory_mode = 0777 recycle:keeptree = yes Some confs I got from the official samba docs at: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba3-HOWTO/VFS.html#id2644353 Others I got from forums around the internet, like the 'mode' and commented 'config-file' above. One question and one problem: 1. The question: I could not find documentation for 'mode' or 'config-file' neither for recycle nor vfs. Where can I find it? The above url has none. 2. The problem: when a user deletes a file from some folder, I get this folder created on .recycle with permissions 0700, no matter the recycle:directory_mode = 0777 config above. This forbids the next user who tries to delete a file from the same folder. How can I make the recycle create the tree with 0777 permission? Best regards and sorry if this has already been discussed before. Thanks for any hint, docs, whatever. -- Marcio Merlone -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba LDAP and Ubuntu
Gilberto Nunes escreveu: I install samba and LDAP on Ubuntu Server 7.04. I using smbldap-tools... However, when I reboot the system, the Ubuntu server don't work more... It's stalled on services initialize... I notice that the file nsswitch.conf on /etc, have this look: passwd: files ldap group: files ldap shadow: files When I change this lines to this: passwd: files group: files shadow: files All work fine! So, the system booting normaly... It is a known bug, I found on a bugzilla somewhere. The bug consists that the booting process needs the ldap server before it gets started. So, the workaround, for now, is to have a slave ldap server which you can use at least for booting. In my /etc/ldap.conf I have: # grep host /etc/ldap.conf host 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.2 Obviously, 192.168.0.2 is another server on the network which is a slave for localhost. This way the booting process will try localhost and then 192.168.0.2 and boots ok. I am not sure even if it really needs to be a real slave, but I happen to have a real slave on my net, so I had no problem. Good luck -- Marcio Merlone -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Mis-behavior of ldap.conf regarding nss?
Adam Tauno Williams escreveu:
I run a samba 3.0.26a-1ubuntu2.3 on an Ubuntu 7.10 server with OpenLDAP
both for samba and for posix accounts. Everything runs fine, except for
one problem. I have a ou=People-inactive branch on my ldap server on
wich I store (guess what?) inactive people. I don't want my system to
recognize those entries as valid users, so I set my /etc/ldap.conf as
follows:
nss_base_passwd ou=People,dc=a1,dc=ind?one
The problem arose when I tried to add a new machine to the domain. The
smbldap-useradd script is able to add the machine entry on ldap, but the
whole process fails with User not found (translated from the
Portuguese message) on the adding workstation. After googling for about
3 hours without success, I found that if I just comment out the
nss_base_* entries, everything works as expected and am able to join a
machine to the domain.
Does your script create the machine account object in ou=People? You've
verified the object is created at all and you can successfully id
{machine}$?
No, it gets created in ou=Host. Isn't it supposed to be this way?
--
Marcio Merlone
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Group mapping question
Hello all, I run a samba 3.0.26a-1ubuntu2.3 on an Ubuntu 7.10 server with OpenLDAP both for samba and for posix accounts. Everything runs fine, but while trying to solve another issue, I stumped on this odd behavior: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc# net groupmap list | grep Domain Admins Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1234567890-1234567890-1234567890-512) - root But: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc# smbldap-groupshow Domain Admins group Domain Admins doesn't exist Is that something I should worry about? Or can anybody help me find what is going on? Best regards and thanks in advance. -- Marcio Merlone -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Mis-behavior of ldap.conf regarding nss?
Hello all, I run a samba 3.0.26a-1ubuntu2.3 on an Ubuntu 7.10 server with OpenLDAP both for samba and for posix accounts. Everything runs fine, except for one problem. I have a ou=People-inactive branch on my ldap server on wich I store (guess what?) inactive people. I don't want my system to recognize those entries as valid users, so I set my /etc/ldap.conf as follows: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc# grep -v ^#\|^\s*$ ldap.conf host 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.207 base dc=a1,dc=ind ldap_version 3 nss_base_passwd ou=People,dc=a1,dc=ind?one nss_base_shadow ou=People,dc=a1,dc=ind?one nss_base_group ou=Group,dc=a1,dc=ind?one nss_base_hosts ou=Hosts,dc=a1.dc=ind?one nss_base_services ou=Services,dc=a1,dc=ind?one nss_base_networks ou=Networks,dc=a1,dc=ind?one nss_base_protocols ou=Protocols,dc=a1,dc=ind?one nss_base_rpcou=Rpc,dc=a1,dc=ind?one nss_base_netmasks ou=Networks,dc=a1,dc=ind?one nss_base_aliasesou=Aliases,dc=a1,dc=ind?one nss_base_netgroup ou=Netgroup,dc=a1,dc=ind?one [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc# I use two servers on the host line due to this bug: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnss-ldap/+bug/51315 The problem arose when I tried to add a new machine to the domain. The smbldap-useradd script is able to add the machine entry on ldap, but the whole process fails with User not found (translated from the Portuguese message) on the adding workstation. After googling for about 3 hours without success, I found that if I just comment out the nss_base_* entries, everything works as expected and am able to join a machine to the domain. The question: Is that a samba, nss or smbldap-tools bug? Or is this not a bug, but a feature? ;) Or have I lost something? Best regards and thanks in advance. -- Marcio Merlone -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] weird election with non-existant machine
Search for a file called wins.dat, remove it, restart samba and go for a coffee. JJB escreveu: Forced Election: 192.168.1.153 was a mac running Leopard. It has not been on the network for a month, but this keeps happening. Does anyone have an idea where this address might be cached? -- Marcio Merlone -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba Administration Tool recommendations
Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) escreveu: Hi All, I have a project which is to build a customized Linux distribution with a focus on deploying a Samba as Primary Domain Controller. It's pretty much like Trixbox but instead of Asterisk and VOIP, will be focused on Samba. Right now, I am looking for a solution for an administrator to easily manage the service. Of particular importance would be to easily add workstations and set up users for Roaming Profiles. Any recommendations on this? I have already looked at SWAT and Webmin (and I will be including them on the package list). However, I would like a tool that is focused on just Samba as a PDC. The base system I have is Ubuntu Server so it would be great if such a recommendation would be web-based although if a desktop application is what I need, then changing the base system is an option. Thanks in advance, Matt Great idea! As a user, I'd like to suggest you the following features/tools: - Ease to add/manage users and machines; - Ease to manage network workstations (software and hardware inventory/deployment, group policies, etc); - Ease to manage workstations configs (proxy config on browsers, mail settings, logon scripts, enable/disable/manage windows firewall, vnc service and passwords, etc); Regarding machine inventory, have you seen SpiceWorks? I ask because you may have two approaches: 1: a samba focused distro. 2: a network management focused distro. Using samba. The main difficulty on maintaining a samba server is the network/workstations management , which you have to handle with 3rd party tools and scripts (like wpkg), which are not well integrated (because you had to integrate/tweak it yourself). A distro made to address all those issues will be a killer product on the market. Better yet if built on top of Ubuntu server. Sorry if this is not the right place to this. :) Please provide some site or mail list to keep an eye on your progress. Best regards, -- Marcio Merlone -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] BDC + LDAP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Good Moring list I already possess PDC + LDAP. Today the necessity appeared to possess a BDC, but users in base LDAP would like to legalize all, and mine configuracao follows below: [global] ~workgroup = AURORA ~netbios name = fly ~server string = Marcio(CPD) ~passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://121.1.16.245 ~#username map = /usr/local/etc/smbusers ~printcap name = cups ~logon drive = H: ~logon path = \\%L\%U\profiles ~logon home = \\%L\%U ~logon script = logon.bat ~domain logons = Yes ~os level = 33 ~preferred master = Yes ~domain master = No ~passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://121.1.16.245 ~ldap passwd sync = yes ~ldap delete dn = Yes ~ldap admin dn = cn=suporte,dc=auroraalimentos,dc=com,dc=br ~ldap suffix = dc=auroraalimentos,dc=com,dc=br ~ldap machine suffix = ou=Computadores ~ldap user suffix = ou=Usuarios ~ldap group suffix = ou=Grupos ~ldap idmap suffix = ou=Idmap ~idmap backend = ldap:ldap://121.1.16.245 ~idmap uid = 1-2 ~idmap gid = 1-2 ~printing = cups [netlogon] ~comment = Servico de Logon em Rede [ startup.bat ] ~path = /home/samba/netlogon ~browseable = No ~locking = No ~read only = Yes [home] ~comment = Diretorio Pessoal %U, %u ~path = /home/%U ~read only = No ~valid users = %U ~force user = %U ~create mask = 0664 ~directory mask = 0775 ~writeable = Yes ~browseable = No # the default is to use the user's home directory [profiles] ~comment = Perfil %U ~path = /home/samba/profiles ~read only = No ~create mask = 0600 ~directory mask = 0700 ~browseable = No ~guest ok = Yes ~profile acls = Yes ~csc policy = disable ~# next line is a great way to secure the profiles ~force user = %U ~# next line allows administrator to access all profiles ~valid users = %U [dados] ~comment = Suporte Backup ~path = /backup/suporte ~writable = Yes [Musicas] ~comment = Musicas Marcio ~path = /backup/dados ~valid users = marcio ~writable = Yes Now the problem and that nao I obtain to legalize user in the base ldap, in log occurs the following one: [2005/08/24 11:51:49, 1] auth/auth_util.c:make_server_info_sam(840) ~ User mdonada in passdb, but getpwnam() fails! [2005/08/24 11:51:49, 0] auth/auth_sam.c:check_sam_security(324) ~ check_sam_security: make_server_info_sam() failed with 'NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER' [2005/08/24 11:51:56, 1] auth/auth_util.c:make_server_info_sam(840) ~ User mdonada in passdb, but getpwnam() fails! [2005/08/24 11:51:56, 0] auth/auth_sam.c:check_sam_security(324) ~ check_sam_security: make_server_info_sam() failed with 'NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER' Some ideas? Thank's - -- Márcio Luciano Donada T.I. Aurora Alimentos Chapecó(SC) Cooperativa Central Oeste Catarinense mdonada at auroraalimentos dot com dot br -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDDIviyJq2hZEymxcRAr+RAJ9ioQcu6N1+OxBkQ60RbgRfPrGqrACgsk43 ux+Om7x7U3LJKNCdD8VgNus= =Uyfi -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] LM and NT password (help)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 good day I am using phpLdapPasswd to modify the password of the users of the Domain. But so that this was possible used one patch, that I found in http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-January/099108.html. But I am with problems to after enter of the user login in the domain. The problem is the SambaLMPassword and SambaNTPassword. Somebody has some tip so that the process functions correctly? []'s - -- Márcio Luciano Donada T.I. Aurora Alimentos Chapecó(SC) Cooperativa Central Oeste Catarinense mdonada at auroraalimentos dot com dot br -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDAJVwyJq2hZEymxcRAkCzAJ98Ly1XBh9eYpprJCjS0nLnTqTNiQCg00gN TZmp2Pr/KnNNPJBC9/VTfeM= =pDMH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] passwd (LDAP+PDC)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Good day, It was visiting the last message in the link, http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-January/099108.html, an alternative exists stops phpldappasswd change password for smbldap-tools in PDC. Mine it doubts and the following one, some uses this resource? had problems with funcao SSHA, but with the MD5 this ok, but only with the samba + ldap and it more does not legalize in windows. Any tip and good coming. Thank's, - -- Márcio Luciano Donada T.I. Aurora Alimentos - Chapecó(SC) Cooperativa Central Oeste Catarinense mdonada at auroraalimentos dot com dot br -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC1QLAyJq2hZEymxcRAhaCAJ4yCbIqcUN4ptnsU5sp+mwC1kEoygCeJ900 +r7v5q+WgZ6R+8K8QItG3ak= =d6Hy -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] php + smbldap-passwd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Good day, It was visiting the last message in the link, http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-January/099108.html, an alternative exists stops phpldappasswd change password for smbldap-tools in PDC. Mine it doubts and the following one, some uses this resource? had problems with funcao SSHA, but with the MD5 this ok, but only with the samba + ldap and it more does not legalize in windows. Any tip and good coming. Thank's, - -- Márcio Luciano Donada T.I. Aurora Alimentos - Chapecó(SC) Cooperativa Central Oeste Catarinense mdonada at auroraalimentos dot com dot br -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC0msSyJq2hZEymxcRAo8sAKCr0UxsJiEtjnh3zMvqYPpHhx2UegCfQF8i RmKxmoogYhZhaG/7vt8QLP8= =ajyK -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problems with Print Server on Samba
Dear, I tried to configure my Samba Server just to print, but i had some problems: In Windows 2000 everything works nicely, but in windows 98 i can't see the printer of my Samba Server and i really don't know why. The printer that a configures its: LaserJet-2200 My OS its: Debian Sarge ** My smb.conf [global] workgroup = test netbios name = user1 server string = Print Server dns proxy = no log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 syslog only = no syslog = 0 panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d ### Authentication ### security = share encrypt passwords = false obey pam restrictions = yes invalid users = root ## Printing ## load printers = yes printing = cups printcap name = cups Misc socket options = TCP_NODELAY #=== Share Definitions === [printers] comment = LaserJet-2200 browseable = Yes path = /tmp printable = yes public = yes writable = yes create mode = 0775 [print$] comment = Printer Drivers path = /var/lib/samba/printers browseable = yes read only = yes guest ok = no ** testparm /etc/samba/smb.conf Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf Processing section [printers] Processing section [print$] Loaded services file OK. Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions # Global parameters [global] workgroup = FPA server string = Servidor de Impressao Secretaria security = SHARE encrypt passwords = No obey pam restrictions = Yes syslog = 0 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 printcap name = cups dns proxy = No panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d invalid users = root printing = cups print command = lpq command = %p lprm command = [printers] comment = LaserJet-2200 path = /tmp read only = No create mask = 0775 guest ok = Yes printable = Yes browseable = No [print$] comment = Printer Drivers path = /var/lib/samba/printers ** smbclient -L localhost Password: Domain=[test] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.14a-Debian] Sharename Type Comment - --- print$ Disk Printer Drivers IPC$IPC IPC Service (Servidor de Impressao Secretaria) ADMIN$ IPC IPC Service (Servidor de Impressao Secretaria) Domain=[test] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.14a-Debian] Server Comment ---- USER1 Print Server WorkgroupMaster ---- test zeta Thanks, Marcio Garcia -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] ACQUA SERVER
Hi, Gibson. I saw a page in the internet that you say something about ACQUA SEVER. Could you tell me more about it? I need to a sourch about it. Thank you very much. Marcio - Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador do Yahoo! agora. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] 2 Server's over VPN
Hi, I'm installing a VPN bridge. So the localareas are on the same IP class and we have broadcast And i want on both ends to have a Samba Server what do you recomend??? I'm Using mobile profiles so its better on each end we have its on profile -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN
If i Make a PDC and BDC but use on the profiles sharing local folders on each server will it work??? -Original Message- From: Arno Seidel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sexta-feira, 30 de julho de 2004 08:48 To: Varjao, Marcio Subject: AW: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN Hi, basicaly depends this on your vpn-connection speed maybe it would be easier to syncronize the profiles on both servers with rsync -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Varjao, Marcio Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Juli 2004 13:40 An: Samba (E-mail) Betreff: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN Hi, I'm installing a VPN bridge. So the localareas are on the same IP class and we have broadcast And i want on both ends to have a Samba Server what do you recomend??? I'm Using mobile profiles so its better on each end we have its on profile -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN
The problem is that there are some users ho have 1 GB or more profiles The bandwidth isnt that good Outlook PST is the main problem -Original Message- From: Arno Seidel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sexta-feira, 30 de julho de 2004 09:43 To: Varjao, Marcio Subject: AW: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN Hi, it should work...but think about the sync for the profiles that you have on each server all profiles -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Varjao, Marcio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Juli 2004 13:51 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Samba (E-mail) Betreff: RE: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN If i Make a PDC and BDC but use on the profiles sharing local folders on each server will it work??? -Original Message- From: Arno Seidel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sexta-feira, 30 de julho de 2004 08:48 To: Varjao, Marcio Subject: AW: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN Hi, basicaly depends this on your vpn-connection speed maybe it would be easier to syncronize the profiles on both servers with rsync -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Varjao, Marcio Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Juli 2004 13:40 An: Samba (E-mail) Betreff: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN Hi, I'm installing a VPN bridge. So the localareas are on the same IP class and we have broadcast And i want on both ends to have a Samba Server what do you recomend??? I'm Using mobile profiles so its better on each end we have its on profile -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN
I'm from brasil Here the internet isn't very reliable Sometimes the Net stops and comes back only hours later, the internet providers are the problem What hapens with outlook in the process??? And other files... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ilia Chipitsine Sent: sexta-feira, 30 de julho de 2004 09:52 To: Varjao, Marcio Cc: Samba (E-mail) Subject: RE: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN The problem is that there are some users ho have 1 GB or more profiles what is content of those profiles ? recently I modified domain policy and after that, for example, Application Data, My Documents and Desktop are not moving across network anymore. They are put on network shares, but they are not anymore parts of roaming profile. The bandwidth isnt that good Outlook PST is the main problem Outlook doesn't have to be part of roaming profile also. for example, you can move outlook.pst out of roaming profile (on \\server\username\outlook-folder) and after you start Outlook, it will not find Outlook.pst ... and it will kindly ask You where can it find outlook.pst yes, that file is damn big, but data transfer across network are not that big when it is used. -Original Message- From: Arno Seidel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sexta-feira, 30 de julho de 2004 09:43 To: Varjao, Marcio Subject: AW: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN Hi, it should work...but think about the sync for the profiles that you have on each server all profiles -Urspr?ngliche Nachricht- Von: Varjao, Marcio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Juli 2004 13:51 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Samba (E-mail) Betreff: RE: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN If i Make a PDC and BDC but use on the profiles sharing local folders on each server will it work??? -Original Message- From: Arno Seidel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sexta-feira, 30 de julho de 2004 08:48 To: Varjao, Marcio Subject: AW: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN Hi, basicaly depends this on your vpn-connection speed maybe it would be easier to syncronize the profiles on both servers with rsync -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Varjao, Marcio Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Juli 2004 13:40 An: Samba (E-mail) Betreff: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN Hi, I'm installing a VPN bridge. So the localareas are on the same IP class and we have broadcast And i want on both ends to have a Samba Server what do you recomend??? I'm Using mobile profiles so its better on each end we have its on profile -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN
I´m Going to use the OpenVPN bridge, for the machines is invisble, the bridge allow's broadcast and netbios Do you think i still will have a problem??? What do you suggest??? -Original Message- From: Ilia Chipitsine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sexta-feira, 30 de julho de 2004 10:07 To: Varjao, Marcio Cc: Samba (E-mail) Subject: RE: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN I'm from brasil Here the internet isn't very reliable there are two kinds of connections: 1) fast, dirty cheap and reliable those connections usually called LAN 2) not so fast, not so reliable, not so cheap those connections usually called WAN fileserver protocols like SMB do not work within WAN, they work for LAN only. if you are dealing with 2) you can use http/sql/rdp protocols they were specially designed for WAN connections. in your case you can use rdp. or citrix. samba will not work good over unreliable connections. actually, windows timeouts are somewhat hardcoded. most probably you won't be able to describe your windows workstation to wait for hours for file locking. Sometimes the Net stops and comes back only hours later, the internet providers are the problem What hapens with outlook in the process??? And other files... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ilia Chipitsine Sent: sexta-feira, 30 de julho de 2004 09:52 To: Varjao, Marcio Cc: Samba (E-mail) Subject: RE: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN The problem is that there are some users ho have 1 GB or more profiles what is content of those profiles ? recently I modified domain policy and after that, for example, Application Data, My Documents and Desktop are not moving across network anymore. They are put on network shares, but they are not anymore parts of roaming profile. The bandwidth isnt that good Outlook PST is the main problem Outlook doesn't have to be part of roaming profile also. for example, you can move outlook.pst out of roaming profile (on \\server\username\outlook-folder) and after you start Outlook, it will not find Outlook.pst ... and it will kindly ask You where can it find outlook.pst yes, that file is damn big, but data transfer across network are not that big when it is used. -Original Message- From: Arno Seidel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sexta-feira, 30 de julho de 2004 09:43 To: Varjao, Marcio Subject: AW: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN Hi, it should work...but think about the sync for the profiles that you have on each server all profiles -Urspr?ngliche Nachricht- Von: Varjao, Marcio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Juli 2004 13:51 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Samba (E-mail) Betreff: RE: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN If i Make a PDC and BDC but use on the profiles sharing local folders on each server will it work??? -Original Message- From: Arno Seidel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sexta-feira, 30 de julho de 2004 08:48 To: Varjao, Marcio Subject: AW: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN Hi, basicaly depends this on your vpn-connection speed maybe it would be easier to syncronize the profiles on both servers with rsync -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Varjao, Marcio Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Juli 2004 13:40 An: Samba (E-mail) Betreff: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN Hi, I'm installing a VPN bridge. So the localareas are on the same IP class and we have broadcast And i want on both ends to have a Samba Server what do you recomend??? I'm Using mobile profiles so its better on each end we have its on profile -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN
Sorry my ignorance but what is rdp??? what's the diference bettwen smb and rdp??? -Original Message- From: Ilia Chipitsine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sexta-feira, 30 de julho de 2004 10:24 To: Varjao, Marcio Cc: Samba (E-mail) Subject: RE: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN I?m Going to use the OpenVPN bridge, for the machines is invisble, the bridge allow's broadcast and netbios Do you think i still will have a problem??? What do you suggest??? if connection is unreliable (from SMB networking point of view :) I suggest to use rdp instead of SMB -Original Message- From: Ilia Chipitsine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sexta-feira, 30 de julho de 2004 10:07 To: Varjao, Marcio Cc: Samba (E-mail) Subject: RE: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN I'm from brasil Here the internet isn't very reliable there are two kinds of connections: 1) fast, dirty cheap and reliable those connections usually called LAN 2) not so fast, not so reliable, not so cheap those connections usually called WAN fileserver protocols like SMB do not work within WAN, they work for LAN only. if you are dealing with 2) you can use http/sql/rdp protocols they were specially designed for WAN connections. in your case you can use rdp. or citrix. samba will not work good over unreliable connections. actually, windows timeouts are somewhat hardcoded. most probably you won't be able to describe your windows workstation to wait for hours for file locking. Sometimes the Net stops and comes back only hours later, the internet providers are the problem What hapens with outlook in the process??? And other files... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ilia Chipitsine Sent: sexta-feira, 30 de julho de 2004 09:52 To: Varjao, Marcio Cc: Samba (E-mail) Subject: RE: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN The problem is that there are some users ho have 1 GB or more profiles what is content of those profiles ? recently I modified domain policy and after that, for example, Application Data, My Documents and Desktop are not moving across network anymore. They are put on network shares, but they are not anymore parts of roaming profile. The bandwidth isnt that good Outlook PST is the main problem Outlook doesn't have to be part of roaming profile also. for example, you can move outlook.pst out of roaming profile (on \\server\username\outlook-folder) and after you start Outlook, it will not find Outlook.pst ... and it will kindly ask You where can it find outlook.pst yes, that file is damn big, but data transfer across network are not that big when it is used. -Original Message- From: Arno Seidel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sexta-feira, 30 de julho de 2004 09:43 To: Varjao, Marcio Subject: AW: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN Hi, it should work...but think about the sync for the profiles that you have on each server all profiles -Urspr?ngliche Nachricht- Von: Varjao, Marcio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Juli 2004 13:51 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Samba (E-mail) Betreff: RE: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN If i Make a PDC and BDC but use on the profiles sharing local folders on each server will it work??? -Original Message- From: Arno Seidel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sexta-feira, 30 de julho de 2004 08:48 To: Varjao, Marcio Subject: AW: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN Hi, basicaly depends this on your vpn-connection speed maybe it would be easier to syncronize the profiles on both servers with rsync -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Varjao, Marcio Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Juli 2004 13:40 An: Samba (E-mail) Betreff: [Samba] 2 Server's over VPN Hi, I'm installing a VPN bridge. So the localareas are on the same IP class and we have broadcast And i want on both ends to have a Samba Server what do you recomend??? I'm Using mobile profiles so its better on each end we have its on profile -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org
[Samba] 2 Samba server
Hi, If I run 2 Samba server on 2 diferent Domains but on the same IP Class Will I have problems -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] 2 Samba server
Will the users of each one be able to acess the shares on the servers and on the clients Do I have to add anything to that work?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of HeRnAn DeL bOcA Sent: sexta-feira, 30 de julho de 2004 08:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] 2 Samba server Importance: High On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:31:17 -0400 Varjao, Marcio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, If I run 2 Samba server on 2 diferent Domains but on the same IP Class Will I have problems you shouldn't have any problem. having two samba server on different domains has nothing to do with th e ip class -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
