Re: [Samba] sambaPwdMustChange not synced on PDC from BDC
nogenetics nogenetics wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:25 AM, nogenetics nogenetics nnogenet...@gmail.com wrote: I have a PDC/BDC samba/ldap environment. PDC: samba 3.0.24 slapd 2.3.30 BDC: samba 3.2.5 slapd 2.4.11 Ldap replication is working fine, but I have noticed two issues 1- when a windows user change password on BDC, sambaPwdMustChange and sambaPwdCanChange is not synced on PDC (using ldap passwd sync = yes and unix password sync = no) 2- when using 'net sam set pwdmustchange' on PDC, sambaPwdMustChange is not synced on BDC Anyone can point me what's wrong? About issue 1- , I can use unix password sync = yes and ldap passwd sync = no (using smbldap-passwd) as workaround, but windows user get that annoying warning message (decode_pw_buffer-incorrect-password-length topic). Is there a way to avoid this warning message? This is a issue many users are experiencing. Thanks in advance for your time Bump! No hints? How are you sure you don't run into OpenLDAP replication problems? The OpenLDAP versions you're running are quite old. slapd 2.3.x is not actively supported anymore. There also were interop issues fixed regarding replication between 2.3.x and 2.4.x and numerous syncrepl fixes for 2.4.x. You should definitely upgrade your OpenLDAP installations. Ciao, Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Request for feedback
Charles Marcus wrote: On 7/22/2009 7:21 PM, Felix Miata wrote: What size limit should we observe for messages to this list? 1) 64 KBytes 2) 128 KBytes 3) 256 KBytes 4) 512 KBytes 5) 1 MByte 6) 2 MBytes 7) Any size None of the above. 20k should be more than enough. Those who wish to share more should upload it somewhere and provide a URL to the upload in their list mail so that those who actually care about that particular large item can load it when they choose, and likely in a browser instead of an email agent. Offers to email large attachments privately could be encouraged as well. I don't know about 20k, but I definitely don't see the need to allow large attachments on a large mailing list like this... The caveat is that things are not archived completely then. URLs get invalid over time. What I would love to find is an easy to install/configure/use mail server add-on that would strip off all attachments over a configured size (in our business we deal with a lot of large attachments - I have to allow a max of 50MB), and drop them on a filesystem, and add a link to the email then pass the email on to its destination. This does not work correctly with signed e-mails I guess. Ciao, Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Please translate M$ speak: create a new organizational unit
Miguel Medalha wrote: I am a bit new to Samba PDC. When a M$ tech article says: Use Active Directory Users and Computers to create a new organizational unit (OU). What does this mean in Samba PDC talk? Please translate. That is LDAP terminology, not MS's. Hmm, yes and no. In MS AD a OU means a little bit more than in pure LDAP. In AD you create a OU 1. to delegate the administration of a subset of users, groups and computers and 2. to attach a group policy to a subset of users and computers. This will be relevant for Samba4. Ciao, Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
