Re: [Samba] file server or member server?

2013-07-03 Thread Nick Boyce
I'll have a go  :)

My 2p:

A Windows domain is an authentication-and-authorisation space, defined
by a database of all usernames known within that space, together with
their passwords, group memberships and much more related stuff.  The
username database (held as a set of files of course) is managed by one
or more servers dedicated to the task of processing logon attempts,
verifying passwords, authorising filesystem access requests, etc.
This type of server is known as a domain controller (or domain server
if you like).

The domain will also contain, in general, many workstations used by
the end-users, and a number of servers holding files, services and
other objects available for the use of the users. The files and
services have permission settings which define which users can access
them and in which ways.  The permission settings reference the
usernames defined in the username database.

Any machine (workstation or server) needing to make use of the
username database must be joined to the domain (which means
exchanging keys, so that secure communication can occur); we call such
machines members of the domain  member servers, member
workstations.  In a medium to large organisation there are usually
quite a few member servers dedicated to file serving, some to web
serving, some to print serving, and a few to more esoteric tasks (SQL,
DNS, DHCP, WINS [does that still exist ?], etc. etc.).

You could refer to these servers as fileservers, webservers,
printservers, SQLservers, DNS servers, etc.  you see the pattern
here ? :-)

You /can/ combine some of these server roles (including domain
controller) in one physical server, but you must be careful about
performance, especially in geographically dispersed networks.  Note
that all access requests must ultimately effectively be processed and
approved by the domain controllers, which can make them pretty busy
machines - so that job is often done by dedicated servers.

There may also be other Windows servers owned by the organisation,
which are not members or controllers of the domain - these servers are
known as stand-alone servers, and their users will not share the same
username  password database as is used within the domain.

Steve Are there any guidelines for this sort of stuff?

Yes.  In the Microsoft world, typically the sysadmins all go on [gulp]
MCSE (Microsoft Certified System Engineer) training programmes,
where all this stuff is taught in some detail - including how to
estimate performance requirements from expected user population 
required data flows, and thus how to arrive at an effective network
and domain design.  Usually you discover that you need an unbelievable
number of servers, and that the cost of server licenses and client
access licenses (an iniquitous concept) is likely to bankrupt your
employer ;-)  After your boss has had a heart attack, you think
about Samba 

I don't know whether or not there are FOSS-world courses which teach
the same (CIFS/SMB/AD) concepts.

You can also find any number of $50 text books on the subject
(Windows Active Directory) in any decent bookstore.
e.g. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920028932.do
Active Directory Cookbook, 4th Edition
Solutions for Administrators  Developers
(but they will usually be focused on Microsoft products).

BTW: if you don't already know about it, you really should also try to
learn as much of the stuff on this website as you possibly can :
http://ubiqx.org/cifs/
It's more about the protocols, rather than domain design - but still
important for a sysadmin (and it's by one of the Samba team).


[I hope this helped ... maybe you already know all this stuff, and I
didn't understand your question .. it was fun trying anyway :)]

Good luck.

Nick
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] Linux 2.6.31, samba server no longer working

2009-10-19 Thread Nick Boyce
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Timothy Normand Miller
theo...@gmail.com wrote:

 I increased the log level and got something out of log.smbd.  It
 claiming that the user millerti doesn't exist.

I can't help thinking that you shouldn't have had to do that - a
message of that nature should be logged at the default log level.

Cheers
Nick Boyce
--
Leave the Olympics in Greece, where they belong.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] Debian packages for CVE-2008-1105

2008-05-29 Thread Nick Boyce
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 6:34 AM, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Quoting Gerald (Jerry) Carter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
 ==
 ==
 == Subject: Boundary failure when parsing SMB responses
 ==  can result in a buffer overrun
 ==
 == CVE ID#: CVE-2008-1105
[...]
 I've already prepared packages for 3.0.30, which will be uploaded to
 Debian unstable ASAP.
[...]
 Packages for Debian etch (which includes 3.0.24) have been built
 without problems.

[applause] my sincere thanks to the Debian packagers for this effort
in such a short time window [/applause]

Just wondering - given all the improvements (particularly Vista
compatibility) made since 3.0.24 - does anyone know of a backport of
anything later than 3.0.24 for Etch on i386 ?

Cheers
Nick Boyce
-- 
Leave the Olympics in Greece where they belong
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba